Luyu Wang*a,
Jia Songb and
Chunyang Yuc
aCollege of Artificial Intelligence and E-Commerce, Zhejiang Gongshang University Hangzhou College of Commerce, Hangzhou, 311599, China. E-mail: Dr.Luyu-Wang@hotmail.com
bSchool of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. E-mail: songjia111@sjtu.edu.cn
cDesign-AI Laboratory, China Academy of Art, Hangzhou 310009, China. E-mail: yucyzju@hotmail.com
First published on 11th July 2024
This work details a novel application of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers, applied in the fabrication of humidity sensors using quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). An oscillating circuit approach has been utilized to thoroughly investigate the humidity detection characteristics of QCM sensors that are fabricated using MgAl-LDH nanoflowers. The examination encompassed various parameters such as the sensors' response, humidity hysteresis, repeatability, and stability. Experimental results clearly indicate that these MgAl-LDH nanoflower-based QCM sensors exhibit a distinct logarithmic frequency response to varying moisture levels. Notably, the sensitivity of the sensors is intricately tied to the amount of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers utilized during the deposition process. Moreover, these sensors maintain remarkable stability across a wide humidity range spanning from 11% to 97% RH. Additionally, the MgAl-LDH nanoflower-based QCM sensors possess minimal humidity hysteresis and display swift dynamic response and recovery periods, further highlighting their potential for humidity detection applications.
The magnesium aluminum Layered Double Hydroxide (MgAl-LDH), a category of inorganic substances, is distinguished by its distinct stratified composition, featuring alternating strata of Mg2+ and Al3+ hydroxides.14 The proportion between divalent and trivalent metal ions affects its characteristics.15 Nestled within these strata lie negatively charged anions like CO32−, NO3−, and Cl−, exchangeable with cations and water molecules.16 The configuration of MgAl-LDH is crucial for its exceptional porosity and surface area, enhancing its efficacy and selectivity in diverse applications including environmental pollution management, drug delivery, photocatalysis facilitation, and serving as a catalyst in numerous chemical reactions. These unique properties render MgAl-LDH a valuable material with broad applicability.17–20 Huang and others discovered the hydrophilic nature of MgAl-LDH,21 showcasing its capabilities in detecting humidity.
Gas sensors are devices used to detect various gases or humidity in the air.22–26 In the realm of sensing technology, a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) transducer serves as a vital component, converting physical changes in the sensor into electrical signals, thus enabling accurate and sensitive detection.27 The QCM transducer, a well-established platform for mass detection, boasts remarkable sensitivity, capable of identifying mass variations down to the sub-nanogram level, leveraging Sauerbrey's correlation to ensure precise measurements.28 Drawing upon Sauerbrey's correlation, the QCM transducer effectively transforms the absorbed molecular mass into a frequency-sensitive signal by applying sensing substances onto its electrodes, thus enabling sensitive and accurate detection.29 Lately, an increasing number of scientists are investigating the application of QCM transducers in creating humidity sensors.30,31 Although there are currently reports on MgAl-LDH modified QCM,32,33 its application focuses on monitoring ion dynamic behavior, and there is no humidity sensor related application. In this work, the humidity detection capabilities of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers are examined using a QCM transducer. Experimental evaluation of the MgAl-LDH nanoflowers based QCM sensors' ability to detect humidity involves assessing their frequency response, moisture hysteresis, repeatability, stability, and selectivity. As shown in Table 1, this sensor does not exhibit significant performance disadvantages compared to several previously reported humidity sensors, highlighting the innovative application direction of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers in humidity sensor technology.
Detailed descriptions of the production and examination techniques for the MgAl-LDH nanoflowers based QCM humidity sensor are provided in the ESI.† The sketch diagram of humidity detection system is illustrated in Fig. S1 of the ESI.† To assess how the amount of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers deposited impacts sensor efficiency, sensors containing 1, 2, and 3 μL of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers dispersion on QCMs' electrodes were constructed. The corresponding sensors were designated as QCM-1, QCM-2, and QCM-3. The specific information of the QCM samples before and after MgAl-LDH nanoflowers deposition, including frequency, crystal's resistance (Rcrystal), etc., is shown in Table 2.
Sample number | Bare QCM sensor (before MgAl-LDH nanoflowers deposition) | QCM sensor after MgAl-LDH nanoflowers deposition | Frequency and Rcrystal shifts due to MgAl-LDH nanoflowers deposition | Deposition mass of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers (ng) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency (Hz) | Rcrystal (Ω) | Frequency (Hz) | Rcrystal (Ω) | Δf (Hz) | ΔRcrystal (Ω) | ||
QCM-1 | 9985878 | 5.427862 | 9985473 | 5.606280 | 405 | 0.178418 | 210.9375 |
QCM-2 | 9985911 | 5.591627 | 9984994 | 6.131448 | 917 | 0.539821 | 477.6042 |
QCM-3 | 9985892 | 5.398821 | 9984633 | 8.787252 | 1259 | 3.38843 | 655.7296 |
The structural and dimensional characteristics of the MgAl-LDH nanoflowers were thoroughly analyzed using scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging. As shown in Fig. 2a and b, the SEM photographs reveal that the MgAl-LDH nanoflowers exhibit a clustered formation, resembling the shape of rose petals, with a distinct planar sheet morphology. The nanoflowers exhibit both dispersive and fluffy properties, highlighting their unique structure. Furthermore, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, depicted in Fig. 2c and d, reveal a level of transparency in the nanosheets of the MgAl-LDH nanoflowers, indicating their remarkably thin thickness. This observation further confirms the unique and delicate structure of these nanoflowers.
Fig. 2 (a) and (b) SEM images of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers. (c) and (d) TEM images of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers. |
The SEM image of single MgAl-LDH nanoflower together with selected-area element analysis maps of O, Mg, and Al in Fig. 3a indicates that all O (red), Mg (green), and Al (cyan) atoms are distributed uniformly through the whole selected-area, revealing a homogeneous distribution of O, Mg, and Al in the structure of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers. This MgAl-LDH nanoflower was additionally employed in the point analyses of energy dispersive spectra (EDS) (refer to Fig. 3b), illustrating the simultaneous presence of O, Mg, and Al atoms dispersed across the MgAl-LDH nanoflower surface. The comprehensive composition of MgAl-LDH nanoflower was determined through inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) analysis, as depicted in Table 3. The MgAl-LDH nanoflowers exhibit a weight concentration of 50.60% for O, 33.61% for Mg, and 15.79% for Al, as determined through precise compositional analysis.
Fig. 3 (a) Elemental mapping characterization of prepared MgAl-LDH nanoflower. (b) EDS profile obtained from MgAl-LDH nanoflower. |
Element | Amount (wt%) |
---|---|
O | 50.60 |
Mg | 33.61 |
Al | 15.79 |
To evaluate the influence of varying MgAl-LDH nanoflower deposition amounts on sensor efficiency, we fabricated sensors with precisely 1, 2, and 3 μL of MgAl-LDH nanoflower dispersion deposited onto the electrodes of QCMs. These tailored sensors were designated as QCM-1, QCM-2, and QCM-3, respectively. Surface structures of QCM-1, QCM-2, and QCM-3 were examined using SEM. As depicted in Fig. 4a–c, it's noticeable that with the addition of more MgAl-LDH nanoflowers disperse liquid, there's a corresponding rise in the distribution density of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers. Concurrently, as depicted in Fig. 4d–f, surface water droplet contact angles were tested on QCM-1, QCM-2, and QCM-3 at angles of 69.39°, 69.57°, and 69.80°, respectively. As is commonly known, a water droplet's contact angle below 90° indicates a hydrophilic surface.42 This suggests that the surfaces of the three sensors are hydrophilic, thereby enabling them to detect humidity effectively.
Fig. 4 Surficial SEM images of (a) QCM-1, (b) QCM-2, and (c) QCM-3. The contact angle test result of (d) QCM-1, (e) QCM-2, and (f) QCM-3. |
Fig. 5 (a) The frequency shift data of QCM-1, QCM-2, and QCM-3 as a function of humidity. (b) The logarithmic fitting curves of log(frequency shift) versus humidity for QCM-1, QCM-2, and QCM-3. |
Hysteresis levels play a crucial role in humidity sensing, and minimizing them is highly desirable.44 To evaluate the hysteresis in MgAl-LDH nanoflower-based QCM sensors, the sensors were subjected to a humidity cycle, initially increasing from 11% to 97% RH for water absorption, and subsequently decreasing to 11% RH for water desorption. Fig. 6 illustrates the ensuing curves of humidity hysteresis. This illustration reveals that the desorption response curves of the MgAl-LDH nanoflower based QCM sensors lag slightly behind their adsorption response curves. Across the full spectrum of humidity (11–97% RH), the MgAl-LDH nanoflowers based QCM sensors exhibit no noticeable humidity hysteresis. The minimal humidity hysteresis noted is due to the enhanced adsorption and desorption of water molecules in MgAl-LDH nanoflowers. The two-dimensional structural characteristics and numerous active sites present in MgAl-LDH nanoflowers offer significant advantages for the adsorption and desorption of water molecules.
Lucklum et al. found that an increase in frequency in QCM is accompanied by an increase in its resistance, and excessive frequency is detrimental to the stability of the QCM.45 Additionally, Vig et al. reported that resistance is proportional to the energy dissipation of a quartz resonator, and excessive energy dissipation is detrimental to the stability of the quartz resonator.46 Therefore, a larger resistance results in a poorer stability of a QCM.43 The variation in the crystal's resistance (Rcrystal) of the MgAl-LDH nanoflowers based QCM sensors to humidity levels was observed to assess the sensors' stability. Fig. 7 illustrates the Rcrystal measurements of sensors under various humidity conditions, noting that the Rcrystal readings of QCM sensors using MgAl-LDH nanoflowers fall within a 60 Ω range in humidity between 11% and 75% RH. Nonetheless, it's important to mention that the Rcrystal readings of the sensor, particularly the QCM-3 sensor, which contains numerous MgAl-LDH nanoflowers, showed a significant rise when humidity levels exceeded 75%. As an illustration, the QCM-3 sensor's Rcrystal measurement stood at 151 at 97% RH, approximately 17 times higher than its measurement at 11.3% RH. The findings suggest that the steadiness of the MgAl-LDH nanoflowers based QCM sensor, when heavily laden with MgAl-LDH nanoflowers, deteriorates in environments with elevated humidity, rendering it ineffective for precise identification of extremely high humidity.43 Therefore, in practical applications, it's crucial not to blindly increase the quantity of material loaded onto the QCM surface, but rather to choose an appropriate quantity of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers for deposition, which is essential for maintaining a balance between sensitivity and stability. In this study, based on the comprehensive test results from Fig. 5 and 7, QCM-2 was found to have a good balance between sensitivity and resistance stability compared to QCM-1 and QCM-3, so it was selected for further testing.
The response and recovery curve of the QCM-2 sensor demonstrates its sensing characteristics. This curve clearly show how the sensors detect H2O molecule adsorption and desorption, thereby evaluating their performance in humidity sensing. As shown in Fig. 8a, the QCM-2 sensor shows continuous frequency shift to relative humidity ranging from 11% RH to 97% RH. This sensor demonstrates good reversibility as the relative humidity increases. When the QCM-2 sensor is returned to 0% RH, the baseline quickly re-establishes. Fig. 8b shows the response time and recovery time of the QCM-2 sensor. The response time is the duration for a sensor to achieve 90% of the total frequency change during response, while the recovery time is the duration for a sensor to achieve 90% of the total frequency change during recovery.47 The response time and recovery time of the QCM-2 sensor are 9 s and 12 s, respectively. To assess the repeatability of the QCM-2 sensor, it was relocated to an 11% RH setting for a trio of cycles. To assess the short-term repeatability of the QCM-2 sensor, it was relocated to an 11% RH environment for three cycles of testing. As shown in Fig. 8c, the sensor's output frequencies were captured instantaneously throughout the entire process, demonstrating that after three rounds of varying humidity conditions, the frequency of the QCM-2 sensor consistently reverted to its original level, highlighting its short-term repeatability. Extensive research has been conducted to assess the long-term stability of the QCM-2 sensor. As depicted in Fig. 8d, the QCM-2 sensor underwent weekly testing across various relative humidity levels (11%, 33%, 52%, 75%, and 97%) for a duration of 20 days, demonstrating consistent stability without any significant changes over time.
Fig. 9a illustrates the sensitivity of QCM-2 sensor to 52% RH and 1000 ppm concentrations of various gases, including ethanol, formaldehyde, ammonia, carbon dioxide, and oxygen. Evidently, when contrasted with the 1000 ppm interference gases, the QCM-2 sensor exhibited a significantly greater frequency shift towards water molecules. Evidence shows the humidity sensor's high specificity towards water molecules. This remarkable selectivity can be attributed to the abundant hydroxyl groups on the surface of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers.48 Many scientists have already reported the reversible adsorption and desorption capabilities of hydroxyl groups for water molecules in the air, as hydrogen bonding adsorption belongs to weak adsorption interaction.49–51 As shown in Fig. 9b, under humidity conditions, water molecules adhere to the hydroxyl groups, forming an initial adsorption layer via hydrogen bonds.52 As humidity levels increase, water molecules attach to two adjacent hydroxyl groups via hydrogen bonds, forming multilayer physisorption water.53 When environmental humidity decreases sharply, adsorbed water molecules desorb to achieve equilibrium with the surroundings.54 Additionally, materials with porous structures facilitate the rapid adsorption and desorption of water molecules.47,55,56
Fig. 9 (a) Selectivity of the QCM-2 sensor towards 52% RH and 1000 ppm various gasses. (b) Schematic of humidity sensing at MgAl-LDH nanoflowers. |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: The chemical raw materials and synthesis method of MgAl-LDH nanoflowers; characterization; fabrication and test methods of the QCM humidity sensor; schematic of the humidity testing system. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra03800b |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |