Yuan
Tang
ab,
Xiaojie
Wang
a,
Tao
Chen
*a,
Daoguo
Yang
b,
Yueting
Huang
c and
Xianyan
Huang
a
aGuangxi Key Laboratory of Automatic Detecting Technology and Instruments, School of Electronic Engineering and Automation, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China. E-mail: tchen@guet.edu.cn
bPostdoctoral Research Station in Mechanical Engineering, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
cDepartment of Electronic Information Engineering, Guilin Institute of Information Technology, Guilin 541004, China
First published on 4th December 2025
Herein, terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) is used to measure the terahertz spectra of methylparaben (MeP) in the frequency range of 0.5–3.0 THz at different temperatures of 300 K, 330 K, 360 K, and 390 K. Theoretical calculations were conducted using the quasi-harmonic approximation (QHA) method at temperatures of 180 K, 240 K, 300 K, and 360 K. The influence of temperature on the terahertz response of MeP molecules was explored in depth. Both the experimental and theoretical results indicate that as the temperature increases, the terahertz spectrum of this frequency band tends to shift towards the low-frequency region. To further explore the mechanism of this phenomenon, we further used the VMARD method combined with atomic displacement maps to allocate and analyze the vibration modes of each absorption peak at different temperatures. The results indicate that with changes in temperature, there are significant differences in the dominant mechanisms and motion distribution characteristics of each vibration mode, but their motion is still mainly concentrated in the rotational motion of molecules or functional groups. In addition, we used an independent gradient model based on the Hirshfeld partition (IGMH) method combined with atoms in molecules (AIM) theory to explore the effect of temperature on weak interactions in MeP crystals. It was found that the strength of hydrogen bonds varies with temperature, which in turn affects the basic characteristics of weak interactions. This study not only deepens the understanding of the thermodynamic behavior of MeP molecules, but also provides an important theoretical basis and technical support for the thermal stability regulation of materials in the food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries.
Herein, methylparaben (MeP) was selected as the research object, and its crystal structure is shown in Fig. 1. As a widely used preservative, MeP holds an important position in the food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries due to its antibacterial and antifungal properties.8,9 However, although MeP has been widely applied in multiple fields, the understanding of its molecular structure and interaction mechanism is still limited, especially the influence of temperature on its molecular vibration modes and weak interactions has not been fully studied. Temperature, as one of the key factors affecting the properties of materials, can significantly alter the thermal motion state of molecules, thereby affecting their intermolecular interactions and vibration modes.10,11 These changes are typically manifested as frequency shifts and intensity variations in absorption peaks in terahertz spectra. Traditionally, techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy,12 single-crystal X-ray diffraction,13 and liquid chromatography14 have been used to detect and study MeP. However, these methods have limitations in describing complex intermolecular interactions in crystals, particularly in the study of temperature effects. Therefore, this study proposes a method for detecting and studying MeP using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy technology combined with theoretical simulation. Compared with traditional detection methods, THz-TDS technology is more accurate, efficient, and safe in the detection process. By using THz-TDS technology, it is possible to effectively capture the characteristic absorption peaks of MeP in the terahertz band and observe their changes with temperature, thereby revealing the mechanism of the influence of temperature on its molecular vibration modes and weak interactions.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 Crystal structure of MeP, with the red, gray, and white spheres representing oxygen atoms, carbon atoms, and hydrogen atoms, respectively. | ||
In recent years, significant progress has been made in simulating and interpreting terahertz spectra using first principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT).15–17 The DFT method describes multi-electron systems through electron density rather than wave function, greatly simplifying the calculation process, while maintaining high computational accuracy. By combining the quasi-harmonic approximation (QHA),18–21 the influence of temperature on molecular vibrations and weak interactions can be further studied, thus providing a more comprehensive understanding of the thermodynamic behavior of matter. This study not only fills the gap in the research on the effects of temperature on MeP in terahertz spectroscopy, but also provides a new perspective for a deeper understanding of its molecular structure and interaction mechanism.
:
1. Subsequently, the sample was compressed into uniform thin sheets with a thickness of 1.0 mm and a diameter of 13 mm using an FW-4A tablet press.
Given the strong absorption properties of water towards terahertz waves, to ensure the accuracy of the terahertz spectral measurement experimental data, the entire experimental process was carried out in an orderly manner under strictly controlled environmental conditions. To avoid interference from atmospheric moisture on the measurement results during all terahertz spectroscopy measurements, a nitrogen purging system was specially used to keep the sample chamber in a dry nitrogen environment at all times. During the measurement process, nitrogen gas was continuously introduced to maintain a dry environment, effectively ensuring the accuracy and repeatability of the measurement. Besides, the terahertz optical path was completely closed during the entire experimental process, and the interior was filled with dry nitrogen gas, which kept the relative humidity in the sample chamber at a level of less than 2%, minimizing the influence of moisture in the air on terahertz wave absorption.
The electron density function ρ(r) is used to describe the strength of weak interactions. To further describe the types and strengths of weak interactions, the sign(λ2) function defined by the IRI method27 was introduced. Multiplying the strength ρ function used to describe weak interactions and the sign(λ2) used to describe interaction types to obtain the sign(λ2)ρ function, and projecting it onto the corresponding iso-surfaces in different colors can intuitively display the position, strength, and type of weak interactions. The color scale used in this method is shown in Fig. 3. The blue area on the left side of the figure represents weak interactions with attractive effects. The larger the value of ρ(r), the darker the blue, indicating stronger attraction. The small value of ρ(r) in the middle green area indicates weak interaction strength, and the sign of λ2 can be positive or negative. The red area on the right represents the region with mutual exclusion (steric hindrance) effect. The larger the value of ρ(r), the darker the red color, indicating a stronger steric hindrance effect.
The Hessian matrix stands as a crucial instrument for dissecting electron density distributions. By computing the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix (denoted as λ1 > λ2 > λ3), one can ascertain the properties and classifications of electron density critical points. These critical points are predominantly categorized into four types, as follows: (3, −3), (3, −1), (3, +1), and (3, +3). Here, the first parameter of the coordinates represents the total number of non-zero eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix, while the second parameter represents the sum of the sign functions of these eigenvalues. Notably, the (3, −1) critical point typically corresponds to a bond critical point (BCP), characterized by one positive eigenvalue (λ1 > 0) and two negative eigenvalues (λ2 < 0, λ3 < 0). Through AIM topological analysis, the hydrogen bond energy can be estimated based on the electron density at the BCP, with the strength and nature of hydrogen bonds directly correlated with these topological descriptors. The formula for calculating the binding energy of hydrogen bonds is as follows:
| ΔE ≈ −223.08 × ρ(rBCP) + 0.7423 | (1) |
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 Experimentally measured THz spectra of MeP at different temperatures of (a) batch number LRAD5896 and (b) batch number LRAE0392, (c) frequency errors, and (d) refractive index spectra. | ||
In different temperature environments, the terahertz spectrum of MeP always exhibits three distinct absorption peaks. For the convenience of subsequent description, we label these three absorption peaks from left to right as peak 1, peak 2, and peak 3. Among them, the MeP sample with lot number LRAD5896 (as shown in Fig. 4(a)) maintains a relatively stable absorption peak 1 position near 1.61 THz in its terahertz spectrum. As the temperature gradually increases, absorption peak 2 shows a trend towards lower frequencies, specifically shifting from 2.51 THz at 300 K to 2.45 THz at 390 K. Meanwhile, absorption peak 3 also shows a trend of shifting towards lower frequencies, gradually changing from 2.71 THz at 300 K to 2.57 THz at 390 K. The absorption peaks in the terahertz spectra of the MeP sample (lot number: LRAE0392), as illustrated in Fig. 4(b), exhibit high consistency across various temperatures compared to the preceding batch (LRAD5896). Fig. 4(c) illustrates the frequency errors for three absorption peaks in the two batches of MeP samples, revealing that the maximum error (0.09 THz) occurs at absorption peak 3 under 300 K conditions. The above-mentioned experimental results clearly indicate that the terahertz absorption characteristics of MeP are significantly affected by temperature changes, especially the frequency shift phenomenon of absorption peaks 2 and 3, which is likely closely related to the temperature sensitivity of its intermolecular interactions. Given the high spectral similarity between the two sample batches, subsequent measurements and data processing utilized the MeP samples from batch LRAD5896.
The significant advantage of THz-TDS technology lies in its ability to simultaneously obtain the absorption characteristics and refractive index of substances. In this study, the refractive index spectra of MeP in the terahertz frequency band were extracted through experiments (as shown in Fig. 4(d)), and it was found that their fluctuation amplitude was small in the 0.5–3.0 THz frequency band, which is less than 5%, indicating that MeP has relatively stable dispersion characteristics. In the temperature range of 300 K to 390 K, the refractive index shows a gradual decreasing trend as the temperature increases. This phenomenon may be attributed to the combined effects of changes in molecular polarization caused by an increase in temperature, material density reduction caused by thermal expansion, and negative thermal optical coefficient characteristics. It is worth noting that the trend of refractive index change is inherently consistent with the phenomenon of absorption peak shifting towards lower frequencies mentioned earlier, indicating that the temperature sensitivity of intermolecular interactions may simultaneously affect the polarization response and vibration energy level of materials. This provides a key material parameter basis for the design of terahertz functional devices based on temperature regulation.
To further investigate the effect of temperature on the terahertz absorption peaks, this study introduces temperature factors in the theoretical calculations. Considering that experimental spectra can only obtain data at room temperature and above, expanding the calculation temperature range can help to more clearly reveal the impact of temperature changes on the spectra. This study is based on the QHA method, calculating the lattice parameters at different temperatures, and performing restrictive geometric optimization by fixing the lattice parameters. Using these data, the theoretical terahertz spectra at temperatures of 180 K, 240 K, 300 K, and 360 K were further calculated. The temperature-related theoretical calculated spectra are shown in Fig. 5. The results indicate that the theoretical spectra based on QHA can well simulate the terahertz absorption spectra under temperature changes. It accurately predicts the three absorption peaks that exist in the experiment.
According to Fig. 5, it can be seen that as the temperature increases, each absorption peak shift towards lower frequencies. Except for absorption peak 1, the temperature change trend of the calculated spectra is basically consistent with the experimental spectra. The difference between absorption peak 1 in the experimental spectrum and the calculated spectrum may be due to the difficulty of the instrument to capture small frequency shifts when measuring small temperature spacing changes. To quantitatively analyze the frequency shift caused by temperature, Table 1 lists the absorption peak frequencies calculated for MeP at different temperatures. In addition, the experimentally measured 300 K and 360 K terahertz spectra were compared with the calculated spectra in the same graph to further verify the accuracy of the theoretical calculations.
| Temperature (K) | Absorption peak 1 (THz) | Absorption peak 2 (THz) | Absorption peak 3 (THz) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 180 | 1.57 | 2.46 | 2.90 |
| 240 | 1.57 | 2.43 | 2.85 |
| 300 | 1.52 | 2.41 | 2.81 |
| 360 | 1.50 | 2.40 | 2.76 |
A comparison of the experimental and theoretical spectral results for MeP at 300 K and 360 K is shown in Fig. 6. This figure shows that at 300 K, the calculated frequencies of absorption peak 1 and absorption peak 2 are slightly lower than the experimentally measured values, while the calculated frequency of absorption peak 3 is slightly higher than the experimental values. At 360 K, the calculated frequencies of absorption peaks 1 and 2 are also slightly lower than the experimental values, and the calculated frequency of absorption peak 3 is also slightly higher than the experimental values. However, overall, the frequency deviation between the experimental and theoretical absorption peaks at 300 K and 360 K is approximately 0.1 THz, indicating good consistency between the experimental and theoretical calculation results. Meanwhile, the error between the experimental and theoretical calculation results is inevitable, mainly due to the following two reasons. Firstly, the QHA calculation assumes that the lattice vibration is a simple harmonic vibration, and describes the anharmonic effect through volume change approximation. This processing method ignores the high-order interactions between phonons, especially under high temperature conditions, which may lead to insufficient calculation accuracy. Secondly, due to the inertial nature of temperature measurement, there may be temperature fluctuations during the experimental process, which can also have a certain impact on the experimental results. These factors collectively lead to small deviations between the experimental and theoretical spectra.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 Comparison of the experimental and theoretical THz spectra of MeP at (a) 300 K and (b) 360 K. | ||
| Temperature (K) | Mode (THz) | Vibrational mode assignment | Mode assignment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: the υ, δ, γ and τ symbols in the table represent key length extension, key angle bending, out-of-plane angle bending, and dihedral angle torsion, respectively. The percentage in parentheses represents the maximum contribution ratio of the vibration mode. | |||
| 180 | 1.57 | δH(59)C(51)H(63) (7.2%) | υ(45.7%), δ(52.2%) |
| γ(0.3%), τ(1.8%) | |||
| 240 | 1.56 | δH(59)C(51)H(63) (7.2%) | υ(45.7%), δ(52.2%) |
| γ(0.3%), τ(1.8%) | |||
| 300 | 1.52 | δH(57)C(49)H(61) (7.4%) | υ(40.2%), δ(56.8%) |
| γ(0.6%), τ(2.4%) | |||
| 360 | 1.50 | δH(57)C(49)H(61) (9.0%) | υ(41.7%), δ(54.6%) |
| γ(0.5%), τ(3.2%) | |||
| Temperature (K) | Mode (THz) | Vibrational mode assignment | Mode assignment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: υ, δ, γ and τ in the table represent key length extension, key angle bending, out-of-plane angle bending, and dihedral angle torsion, respectively. The percentage in parentheses represents the maximum contribution ratio of the vibration mode. | |||
| 180 | 2.45 | τO(4)C(16)C(20)C(40) (6.0%) | υ(10.6%), δ(12.4%) |
| γ(12.2%), τ(64.8%) | |||
| 240 | 2.40 | δH(54)C(49)H(61) (13.1%) | υ(11.4%), δ(45.8%) |
| δH(56)C(51)H(63) (12.6%) | γ(2.6%), τ(40.1%) | ||
| 300 | 2.39 | δC(40)C(20)C(24)C(68) (6.3%) | υ(8.9%), δ(12.0%) |
| γ(12.5%), τ(66.7%) | |||
| 360 | 2.37 | δC(40)C(20)C(24)C(68) (5.5%) | υ(4.9%), δ(14.5%) |
| γ(13.9%), τ(66.7%) | |||
| Temperature (K) | Mode (THz) | Vibrational mode assignment | Mode assignment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: the υ, δ, γ and τ symbols in the table represent key length extension, key angle bending, out-of-plane angle bending, and dihedral angle torsion, respectively. The percentage in parentheses represents the maximum contribution ratio of the vibration mode. | |||
| 180 | 2.47 | δH(54)C(49)H(61) (11.4%), δH(56)C(51)H(63) (11.3%) | υ(12.6%), δ(39.3%) |
| γ(2.4%), τ(45.7%) | |||
| 240 | 2.44 | τO(4)C(16)C(20)C(40) (6.0%) | υ(5.9%), δ(13.6%) |
| γ(12.1%), τ(68.4%) | |||
| 300 | 2.43 | δH(54)C(49)H(61) (11.4%), δH(56)C(51)H(63) (11.3%) | υ(12.5%), δ(39.5%) |
| γ(6.0%), τ(41.9%) | |||
| 360 | 2.42 | δH(54)C(49)H(61) (11.4%), δH(56)C(51)H(63) (11.4%) | υ(12.5%), δ(39.7%) |
| γ(6.0%), τ(41.8%) | |||
| Temperature (K) | Mode (THz) | Vibrational mode assignment | Mode assignment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note: the υ, δ, γ and τ symbols in the table represent key length extension, key angle bending, out-of-plane angle bending, and dihedral angle torsion, respectively. The percentage in parentheses represents the maximum contribution ratio of the vibration mode. | |||
| 180 | 2.90 | τO(2)C(14)C(18)C(38) (7.9%) | υ(5.1%), δ(8.3%) |
| γ(19.3%), τ(67.4%) | |||
| 240 | 2.85 | τO(3)C(15)C(19)C(39) (7.8%) | υ(6.6%), δ(8.9%) |
| γ(20.8%), τ(63.7%) | |||
| 300 | 2.81 | τO(3)C(15)C(19)C(39) (7.7%) | υ(6.4%), δ(8.5%) |
| γ(18.8%), τ(66.3%) | |||
| 360 | 2.76 | τO(3)C(15)C(19)C(39) (7.6%) | υ(6.8%), δ(8.7%) |
| γ(18.2%), τ(66.3%) | |||
Table 2 shows the VMARD analysis results of the first absorption peak of MeP. The analysis shows that absorption peak 1 is mainly dominated by vibration mode 1, and its vibration characteristics mainly come from the contributions of bond length stretching vibration and bond angle bending vibration. As the temperature increases, the dominant mechanism of vibration mode 1 changes. The contribution rate of bond length stretching vibration decreases from 45.7% to 41.7%, while the contribution rate of bond angle bending vibration increases from 52.2% to 54.6%. Specifically, the dominant role of the corresponding maximum contribution of C(52)H(60) bond length stretching vibration is gradually replaced by H(57)C(49)H(61) bond angle bending vibration. However, due to the fact that the maximum contribution value of the defined internal coordinates only accounts for 9.0% of the entire vibration mode contribution, it indicates that the motion of vibration mode 1 is relatively dispersed in the internal coordinate space. However, as shown in Fig. 7, the overall motion of vibration mode 1 exhibits a characteristic of rotation around the a-axis, mainly manifested as methyl rotation bending vibration. When the temperature is low, the molecules of O1 and O2 tend to rotate clockwise around the a-axis, while the molecules of O3 and O4 tend to rotate counterclockwise around the a-axis. When the temperature increases above 300 K, the rotation direction of the molecules is reversed, and the molecules of O1 and O2 rotate counterclockwise around the a-axis, while the molecules of O3 and O4 rotate clockwise around the a-axis.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 7 Atomic displacement diagrams of the vibration mode 1 of MeP at temperatures of (a) 180 K, (b) 240 K, (c) 300 K, and (d) 360 K. | ||
The second absorption peak of MeP is mainly formed by the coupling effect of vibration modes 2 and 3. The VMARD analysis results of vibration mode 2 with temperature variation are shown in Table 3. At 180 K, the vibration contribution of vibration mode 2 mainly comes from dihedral angle torsion, with contribution rate of 64.8%. However, the maximum contribution of dihedral angle torsion only accounts for 6.0% of the entire vibration contribution, indicating that the motion distribution of vibration mode 2 is relatively dispersed at this temperature. When the temperature increases to 240 K, the dominant mechanism of vibration mode 2 shifts to bond angle bending and dihedral angle torsion, with their vibration contribution rates accounting for 45.8% and 40.1%, respectively. The maximum contribution still comes from bond angle bending of H(54)C(49)H(61) and H(56)C(51)H(63). When the temperature further increased to 300 K and 360 K, the dominant mechanism of vibration mode 2 shifted again to dihedral angle torsion, which accounted for 66.7% of the total vibration contribution, while the maximum contribution of dihedral angle torsion (dihedral angle torsion of C) was only 6.3% and 5.5%, respectively, further confirming the significant dispersion of the motion distribution of vibration mode 2.
In summary, as the temperature changes, vibration mode 2 does not exhibit a single dominant motion mode throughout. According to the analysis of the atomic displacement diagram (as shown in Fig. 8), vibration mode 2 exhibits more pronounced methyl rotation motion compared to vibration mode 1. Specifically, at 240 K, the methyl groups of molecules O2 and O4 exhibit a counterclockwise rotation trend around the a-axis, while the methyl groups of molecules O1 and O3 exhibit a clockwise rotation trend around the a-axis. At 180 K, 300 K, and 360 K, the methyl groups of molecules O1 and O2 rotate in the same direction around the a-axis, and the methyl groups of molecules O3 and O4 also rotate in the same direction around the a-axis, exhibiting a counterclockwise rotation trend.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 8 Atomic displacement diagrams of the vibration mode 2 of MeP at temperatures of (a) 180 K, (b) 240 K, (c) 300 K, and (d) 360 K. | ||
Table 4 shows the VMARD analysis results of vibration mode 3 as a function of temperature. Unlike vibration mode 2, vibration mode 3 is dominated by dihedral angle torsion throughout the entire temperature range, but its contribution decreases with an increase in temperature. When the temperature increases from 180 K to 360 K, the contribution rate of dihedral angle torsion significantly decreases from 45.7% to 41.8%. It is worth noting that at 180 K, 300 K, and 360 K, the vibration contribution of bond angle bending is close to that of dihedral angle torsion, only slightly lower than the latter. Moreover, at these temperature points, the maximum proportion of vibration contribution comes from the bond angle bending modes of H(54)C(49)H(61) and H(56)C(51)H(63), with contribution rates of 11.4% and 11.3%, respectively, rather than dihedral angle torsion. However, at 240 K, the vibration contribution of bond angle bending significantly decreased, and dihedral angle torsion dominated the vibration contribution, with the maximum contribution coming from the dihedral angle torsion of O(4)C(16)C(20)C(40), which was 6.0% (240 K). In summary, although dihedral angle torsion remains dominant throughout the entire temperature range, its maximum contribution rate is only 6.0%, and the maximum vibration contribution rate does not always come from dihedral angle torsion of O(4)C(16)C(20)C(40).
Fig. 9 shows the atomic displacement diagram corresponding to vibration mode 3. Vibration mode 3 mainly exhibits rotational motion of methyl groups throughout the temperature change process, showing similar motion at 180 K and 240 K. The main motion is that the methyl groups of molecules O1 and O2 rotate clockwise around the a-axis, while the methyl groups of molecules O3 and O4 rotate counterclockwise around the a-axis. The motion of the molecules at 300 K and 360 K is slightly different from that at 180 K and 240 K. The motion of the methyl groups in molecules O2 and O4 is similar, but the motion of the methyl groups in molecules O1 and O3 is opposite, that is, the methyl groups of molecules O1 and O4 rotate counterclockwise around the a-axis, and the methyl groups of molecules O2 and O3 rotate clockwise around the a-axis.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 9 Atomic displacement diagrams of the vibration mode 3 of MeP at temperatures of (a) 180 K, (b) 240 K, (c) 300 K, and (d) 360 K. | ||
The third absorption peak of MeP is mainly dominated by vibration mode 4, and Table 5 shows the VMARD analysis results of vibration mode 4 with a variation in temperature. Throughout the temperature range, the vibration mode is dominated by dihedral angle torsion, and the main vibration contribution comes from the dihedral angle torsion of O(3)C(15)C(19)C(39). However, its maximum contribution value is only 7.9%. This result indicates that although the motion characteristics of vibration mode 4 are mainly dihedral angle torsion, its vibration motion is not concentrated on specific functional groups, but presents a dispersed distribution.
By analyzing the atomic displacement diagram corresponding to vibration mode 4 (as shown in Fig. 10), it can be found that except for 180 K, molecules O1 and O2 exhibit a counterclockwise rotation trend around the c-axis (viewed from the c-axis ab plane), while molecules O3 and O4 exhibit a clockwise rotation trend around the c-axis. At 180 K, the rotation direction of molecules O1 and O2 changes to clockwise, while molecules O3 and O4 change to counterclockwise rotation. It is worth noting that compared with the aforementioned vibration modes, the overall rotation trend of vibration mode 4 is weaker, and thus the directional arrows in the atomic displacement diagram are shorter.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 10 Atomic displacement diagrams of the vibration mode 4 of MeP at temperatures of (a) 180 K, (b) 240 K, (c) 300 K, and (d) 360 K. | ||
By comparing and analyzing the temperature response behavior of multiple vibration modes, it was found that there are differences in the sensitivity of the different modes to temperature changes, which may be related to the molecular motion types and spatial orientations involved in each vibration mode. Vibration modes 1, 2, 3, and 4 exhibit different dominant mechanisms and motion distribution characteristics, with their motion modes mainly focused on the rotational motion of molecules or functional groups (such as methyl). It is worth noting that as the temperature changes, the direction of motion of some vibration modes remains unchanged, while others undergo significant reversal. These findings provide important theoretical basis for a deeper understanding of the molecular dynamics behavior and temperature dependence of MeP.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 11 IGMH analysis results for MeP at temperatures of (a) 180 K, (b) 240 K, (c) 300 K, and (d) 360 K (the iso-value of the three-dimensional iso-surface map is 0.015). | ||
Through in-depth analysis of the 3D iso-surface map with an iso-value of 0.015 (corresponding to the upper right corner of the 2D scatter plot), it can be observed that the weak interaction distribution map in MeP crystal shows two green regions at 180 K. These regions significantly decrease in area at 240 K, only one remains at 300 K, and they completely disappear at 360 K. The existence of these green areas is closely related to van der Waals interactions, and their dynamic behavior with temperature changes indicates that van der Waals interactions are highly sensitive to temperature changes and gradually weaken with an increase in temperature until they disappear. Through further analysis of the two-dimensional scatter plot, it can be found that although the overall distribution area of van der Waals interactions maintains high similarity at the macroscopic scale when the iso-value is 0.015, there are still a few differences in data points at the microscopic scale, indicating that the influence of temperature changes on van der Waals interactions is mainly reflected in local details. In addition, when the iso-value is large, due to the wide distribution area of the blue peak, the intensity change of hydrogen bonding interaction is more significant compared to van der Waals interaction, and this change is easier to observe. However, this change is still extremely subtle in 2D scatter plots and difficult to capture directly, requiring systematic observation by continuously adjusting iso-value and combining them with 3D contour maps.
To further quantify the effect of temperature changes on the strength of weak interactions, this study systematically analyzed the weak interactions in methyl paraben crystals using the AIM theoretical method. The AIM method can accurately characterize the strength of weak interactions and their temperature dependence by calculating the topological parameters of electron density, such as the electron density at the critical point of the bond. The results of the AIM topology analysis are shown in Fig. 12, and the layer where the intermediate molecule is located is magnified. The critical points of AIM calculation results in MeP occur at HB#1, HB#2, HB#3, and HB#4. HB#1 in MeP is mainly formed by the interaction between –CO– on the central ester group and H– on the surrounding hydroxyl groups, while HB#2 is mainly formed by the interaction between H on the central molecule and –CO– on the surrounding ester groups. Therefore, HB#1 and HB#2 are of the same type of hydrogen bond. HB#3 is mainly formed by the interaction between the O on the hydroxyl group of the central molecule and the H on the benzene ring of the surrounding molecule, while HB#4 is mainly formed by the interaction between the H on the benzene ring of the central molecule and the O on the hydroxyl group of the surrounding molecule. Therefore, HB#3 and HB#4 should be classified as another type of hydrogen bond.
Tables 6–9 show the AIM analysis results of HB#1, HB#2, HB#3, and HB#4 regions at different temperatures, respectively. According to these tables, it can be seen that the electron density in the HB#1 and HB#2 regions significantly decreases with an increase in temperature, which is consistent with the trend of weakening weak interactions caused by an increase in temperature in the IGMH analysis. As the electron density decreases, the hydrogen bonding energy of HB#1 and HB#2 also decreases accordingly, but their strength remains in the weak to moderate range, and electrostatic interaction remains their main driving force. In contrast, under temperature changes, the interaction strength between the HB#3 and HB#4 regions is still lower than the interaction strength between HB#1 and HB#2, but its trend of change is consistent with that of HB#1 and HB#2. As the temperature increases, the electron density of HB#3 and HB#4 also decreases, leading to a further decrease in their hydrogen bonding energy. It is worth noting that the interaction strength between HB#3 and HB#4 gradually changes from weak to moderate, and then to very weak, and their mechanism of action gradually shifts from mainly electrostatic interaction to mainly dispersion and electrostatic interaction. This transformation indicates that the increase in temperature not only weakens the strength of hydrogen bonds, but also changes the fundamental characteristics of interactions.
| Temperature (K) | ρ (a.u.) | ΔE (kcal mol−1) | Strength | Major nature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 180 | 0.0544 | −11.3992 | Weak to medium | Electrostatic |
| 240 | 0.0539 | −11.2709 | Weak to medium | Electrostatic |
| 300 | 0.0536 | −11.2089 | Weak to medium | Electrostatic |
| 360 | 0.0531 | −11.0960 | Weak to medium | Electrostatic |
| Temperature (K) | ρ (a.u.) | ΔE (kcal mol−1) | Strength | Major nature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 180 | 0.0543 | −11.3780 | Weak to medium | Electrostatic |
| 240 | 0.0539 | −11.2706 | Weak to medium | Electrostatic |
| 300 | 0.0535 | −11.1944 | Weak to medium | Electrostatic |
| 360 | 0.0530 | −11.0826 | Weak to medium | Electrostatic |
| Temperature (K) | ρ (a.u.) | ΔE (kcal mol−1) | Strength | Major nature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 180 | 0.0133 | −2.2154 | Very weak | Dispersion and electrostatic |
| 240 | 0.0130 | −2.1658 | Very weak | Dispersion and electrostatic |
| 300 | 0.0128 | −2.1094 | Very weak | Dispersion and electrostatic |
| 360 | 0.0125 | −2.0540 | Very weak | Dispersion and electrostatic |
| Temperature (K) | ρ (a.u.) | ΔE (kcal mol−1) | Strength | Major nature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 180 | 0.0133 | −2.2314 | Very weak | Dispersion and electrostatic |
| 240 | 0.0131 | −2.1744 | Very weak | Dispersion and electrostatic |
| 300 | 0.0128 | −2.1199 | Very weak | Dispersion and electrostatic |
| 360 | 0.0126 | −2.0624 | Very weak | Dispersion and electrostatic |
The research results indicate that a change in temperature has a certain impact on the weak interactions in different regions of MeP crystals, which exhibit varying degrees of temperature dependence. Through quantitative analysis using the AIM theory method, it was found that as the temperature increases, the electron density, ρ, in the hydrogen bonding region decreases. This not only directly weakens the strength of hydrogen bonds, but also may change the essential characteristics of weak interactions, mainly manifested in the HB#3 and HB#4 regions. The decrease in electron density leads to a reduction in hydrogen bond binding energy, and at the same time, the interaction mechanism in some regions gradually shifts from being dominated by electrostatic interactions to being dominated by both dispersion and electrostatic interactions. This discovery is highly consistent with the results of the IGMH analysis, further verifying weak interactions, especially van der Waals interactions, which are highly sensitive to temperature changes.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026 |