Open Access Article
Ranjana Aggarwal
*ab,
Prince Kumar
a and
Suresh Kumar
a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119, Haryana, India
bCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research, New Delhi 110012, India. E-mail: ranjanaaggarwal67@gmail.com; ranjana67in@yahoo.com; Tel: +91-9896740740
First published on 17th June 2025
The development of eco-friendly and energy-efficient synthetic methods remains a priority in modern organic chemistry. In this study, we investigated the reaction of 2-mercaptobenzimidazole and 1,3-diketones in the presence of N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) under conventional and sustainable conditions. While the DCM-mediated and solvent-free approaches yielded 2-((1-acetyl-1H-benzo[4,5]imidazole-2-yl)thio)-1-arylethan-1-one derivatives, the visible-light irradiation strategy promoted a distinct regioselective [3 + 2] cyclo-condensation, affording corresponding cyclized products, i.e., 6-substituted-2-aroyl-3-methylbenzimidazo[2,1-b]thiazole derivatives in high yields. These one-step protocols feature an eco-friendly nature, short reaction times, operational simplicity, high efficiency, and excellent selectivity. Structures of the synthesized compounds were confirmed via comparative analysis of their Rf values, IR, NMR, and HRMS data, with further structural validation via detailed 2D NMR studies, and plausible mechanisms have been proposed for both reaction pathways. Overall, the work highlights condition-driven regioselectivity and the potential of energy-dependent strategies in benzimidazole-based heterocycle synthesis.
Growing interest in benzimidazo[2,1-b]thiazole derivatives is evident from numerous synthetic reports detailing their synthesis and functionalization through diverse methodologies. 2-Mercaptobenzimidazole has been widely used as a synthon for synthesizing biologically active benzimidazo[2,1-b]thiazoles by reacting with various substrates,2,5,7–13 such as carbonyl compounds, propargyl bromides/tosylates, active alkynes and 1,1-dibromoalkenes. Additionally, copper-catalyzed coupling reactions,14,15 e.g. 1,2-aminothiolation of 1,1-dibromoalkenes and coupling of trans-1,2-diiodoalkenes with 2-mercaptobenzimidazole, 1,2-aminothiolation of terminal alkynes and thioamination of nitrogen compounds has been documented16,17 (Fig. 2a).
An alternative route is the construction of an imidazole ring by the reaction of 2-aminothiazole with 2-haloarylboronic acid or quinone under Cu(II)-catalyzed and acetic acid-catalyzed reactions,1,18 respectively (Fig. 2b).
Despite significant advancements in synthesizing benzimidazo[2,1-b]thiazole derivatives, several challenges persist, including reliance on metal catalysts, low atom economy, and harsh reaction conditions. These limitations underscore the need for one-step, environmentally sustainable method to enhance efficiency and versatility. Moreover, direct and selective synthesis of acyl-functionalized benzimidazo[2,1-b]thiazoles remains underexplored. Addressing these gaps could not only enhance the efficiency and versatility of existing methods but also pave the way for greener practices in drug discovery and material science applications.
Prompted by the aforementioned facts and as a continuation of our ongoing efforts toward the synthesis of biologically significant acylated heterocyclic scaffolds,19–21 we herein report a study on the reaction of 1,3-diketones, 2-mercaptobenzimidazoles, and N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) under various reaction conditions including solvent-mediated, solvent-free and visible-light-assisted protocols. These strategies enable regioselective access to two different products i.e. 2-((1-acetyl-1H-benzo[4,5]imidazole-2-yl)thio)-1-arylethan-1-one and acyl-functionalized benzimidazo[2,1-b]thiazole derivatives.
![]() | ||
| Scheme 1 Possible regioisomeric products by the reaction of 2-bromo-1,3-diketones 4 with 2-mercaptobenzimidazole 5. | ||
Keeping in mind the formation of four possible regioisomers, firstly, the reaction of 1-phenylbutane-1,3-dione 3a with 1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazole-2-thione 5a was investigated in the presence of the brominating agent NBS using conventional approaches. The reaction was explored using a range of solvent systems, including DCM, CH3CN, THF, CH3OH, C2H5OH and H2O (Runs 1–6, Table 1), as well as under solvent-free conditions (Run 7, Table 1). Optimization experiments showed that the reaction faced challenges with solvents such as THF, CH3CN, CH3OH, C2H5OH, and H2O, resulting in low product yields, of up to 35%. However, using DCM solvent at room temperature furnished a single regioisomeric product with high yields of 82% with a retention factor (Rf) value of 0.82, indicated by Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) (ethyl acetate-petroleum ether (20
:
80, v/v)).
| Run | Solvent | Energy source | Time | Yieldb (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product with Rf = 0.82 | Product with Rf = 0.56 | ||||
| a Reaction of 3a (1.0 mmol) and 5a (1.0 mmol) was reacted as per reaction conditions.b Isolated yield. | |||||
| 1 | DCM | Rt | 4 h | 82 | — |
| 2 | CH3CN | Rt/reflux | 5 h | Trace/20 | — |
| 3 | THF | Rt/reflux | 6 h | Trace/10 | — |
| 4 | CH3OH | Rt/reflux | 3 h | 10/30 | — |
| 5 | C2H5OH | Rt/reflux | 3 h | 10/35 | — |
| 6 | H2O | Rt/reflux | 2 h | Trace/10 | — |
| 7 | Solvent-free | Rt | 20 min | 86 | — |
| 8 | DCM | LED (9 W) | 2.5 h | — | 58 |
| 9 | CH3CN | LED (9 W) | 2.5 h | — | 56 |
| 10 | THF | LED (9 W) | 9 h | — | Trace |
| 11 | CH3OH | LED (9 W) | 2 h | — | 63 |
| 12 | C2H5OH | LED (9 W) | 30 min | - | 88 |
| 13 | H2O | LED (9 W) | 5 h | — | 25 |
The reaction was further conducted under solvent-free conditions to align the synthetic procedure with environmentally friendly approaches. The solvent-free approach delivered the same regioisomeric product (Rf = 0.82) with an improved yield of 86% in just 20 minutes, highlighting its advantages in terms of operational simplicity, shorter reaction time, and the elimination of hazardous solvents.
In recent years, several studies have highlighted the significance of visible-light-mediated synthesis of benzimidazo[2,1-b]thiazoles, emphasizing the advantages of green synthetic methods.22,23 Moreover, we have carried out the above reaction under visible-light irradiations, specifically, the reaction was performed under the illumination of a 9 W light-emitting diode (LED) lamp, placed 5 cm above the reaction mixture, across a series of experiments (Runs 8–13, Table 1). Interestingly, the product obtained under visible-light conditions displayed a distinct Rf value of 0.56 on TLC, contrasting with the products formed under conventional and solvent-free conditions. Various solvent systems have been tested systematically to identify the most effective conditions to further optimize the LED reaction conditions. Notably, the best results were achieved with ethanol, yielding an impressive 88% in just 30 minutes (Run 12, Table 1). This successful application of visible light and ethanol not only resulted in high yields but also demonstrated the potential for environmentally sustainable chemical transformations.
The attention-grabbing products were comprehensively characterized using various spectral techniques including IR, 1D & 2D NMR ((1H–13C) HSQC and (1H–13C) HMBC) and mass spectrometric analysis. Based on these extensive spectral analyses, the compound with an Rf value of 0.82 was identified as a reported N/S-difunctionalized product,11 namely 2-((1-acetyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)thio)-1-phenylethan-1-one 10a. In contrast, the compound obtained under visible-light conditions, exhibiting an Rf value of 0.56, was characterized and found as the corresponding cyclized product i.e. (3-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]thiazol-2-yl)(phenyl)methanone 6a (Scheme 2). Notably, when compound 10a was refluxed with acetic anhydride the corresponding cyclized compound 6a was obtained.11 The current synthetic protocol offers several advantages, including a one-step synthesis significantly reduced time, environmentally benign reaction media and reaction conditions, etc.
IR spectrum of product 10a exhibited two strong bands at 1708 cm−1 and 1670 cm−1, indicating the presence of two carbonyl groups instead of the expected single band for possible regioisomers (6–9). Conversely, the IR spectrum of product 6a exhibited a single C
O absorption band at 1680 cm−1, suggesting intramolecular cyclization followed by dehydration in the product.
In the 1H NMR (CDCl3) analysis of product 10a, an interesting observation emerged in the aliphatic region, two distinct peaks appeared at δ 2.81 ppm and δ 4.85 ppm, deviating from the expected single peak corresponding to the methyl group for each envisaged regioisomer (6–9). However, in the 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) analysis of compound 6a, a single peak in the aliphatic region at δ 2.73 ppm was observed, contrasting with the spectrum of the N/S-difunctionalized product 10a, which displayed two peaks at δ 2.81 and 4.85 ppm.
Additionally, the 13C NMR (CDCl3) spectrum of 10a provided further validation of the findings from the proton NMR and IR analyses. Notable, the spectrum revealed two distinct peaks in the aliphatic region at δ 26.2 and 40.5 ppm, supporting the formation of interesting product 10a rather than one of the four probable regioisomers. Consequently, through the comprehensive spectral studies conducted, the product was definitively identified as an N/S-difunctionalized compound, specifically 2-((1-acetyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)thio)-1-phenylethan-1-one 10a. The structural determination of the compound can be rationalized by considering an in situ cleavage of the 1,3-diketone moiety. In contrast, the 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) spectrum of compound 6a revealed a sole distinctive peak in the aliphatic region at δ 15.7 ppm, indicating the successful formation of the cyclized product, differing from the N,S-difunctionalized product.
Furthermore, the structural characterization of the synthesized compounds was reinforced through meticulous mass spectrometric analysis. For compound 10a, the mass spectrum revealed a prominent peak at an m/z value of 311.0786 for [M + H]+, further supported the formation of the N/S-difunctionalized product. Conversely, the mass spectrum of compound 6a exhibited a distinct peak at m/z value of 293.0656 for [M + H]+, consisting with the expected cyclized regioisomer via dehydration (loss of H2O, m/z = 18), confirming the successful formation of the desired compound.
The conclusive evidence for the formation of 2-((1-acetyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)thio)-1-phenylethan-1-one 10a was obtained through a comprehensive analysis involving heteronuclear 2D NMR experiments. The correlations of protons and their corresponding carbon atoms within compound 10a were meticulously examined (Fig. 3a). The (1H–13C) HMBC results revealed significant cross-peaks, including the carbonyl carbon (δ 193.9 ppm) exhibiting correlations with the 2′/6′-H proton (δ 8.09–8.11 ppm) of the aryl ring and CH2 (δ 4.85 ppm), indicating the presence of –CH2COAr fragment, ruled out the possibility of the formation of regioisomer 11a. The cross-peak between C-2 (δ 154.3 ppm) of the benzimidazole core and methylene protons (δ 4.85 ppm) indicated the presence of a 2-oxo-2-arylethylthio group at the 2nd position of the benzimidazole ring. Similarly, the cross-peak of carbonyl carbon (δ 168.8 ppm) with methyl protons (δ 26.2 ppm), indicated the presence of the –COCH3 group. All other expected correlations were evident in (1H–13C) HMBC and (1H–13C) HSQC spectra, supported the substituents distribution around the benzimidazole nucleus.
Additionally, a thorough characterization of regioisomer 6a was also achieved through extensive 2D NMR spectral studies, conclusively identified the product as the regioisomer (3-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]thiazol-2-yl)(phenyl)methanone 6a. The (1H–13C) HMBC spectrum of the compound showed correlation peaks of methyl protons (δ 2.73 ppm) with C-2 (δ 130.8 ppm) and C-3 (δ 154.8 ppm), confirming the presence of the methyl group at the 3rd position of benzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole core (Fig. 3b). Similarly, a cross peak between carbonyl carbon at δ 189.3 ppm and 2′/6′-H protons (δ 7.84–7.87 ppm) of the aryl ring indicated the presence of carbonyl carbon adjacent to the aryl ring, thereby, eliminating the possibility of regioisomers with acetyl group 7 and 9. The formation of 7-substituted-2-aroyl-3-methylbenzimidazo[2,1-b]thiazoles 8 was also ruled out, as the HMBC spectrum of the 7-methyl-substituted product did not indicate any correlation between the methyl group protons and the C-12 carbon (δ 125.0 ppm). Therefore, the regioisomeric structure of the final compounds was assigned as 6-substituted-2-aroyl-3-methylbenzimidazo[2,1-b]thiazoles 6.
After optimizing reaction conditions and identifying specific regioisomeric structures, an extensive investigation of substrate tolerance was undertaken. This investigation utilized optimized protocols: a solvent-free protocol for synthesizing N/S-difunctionalized product, 2-((1-acetyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)thio)-1-arylethan-1-one 10(a–e) and a visible-light-mediated synthesis for (3-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]thiazol-2-yl)(aryl)methanone 6(a–n). The substrate scope of the reaction protocols was explored by taking a diverse array of unsymmetrical 1,3-diketones, featuring aryl moieties with electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents, which were subjected to the reaction (Scheme 3). Remarkably, the results highlighted the versatility of the reaction procedure, demonstrating its smooth progression with various substituents. Considering the electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups associated with the diketones, it was observed that the reaction exhibited enhanced yields when the aryl moiety featured an electron-donating group (Table 2). The present one-step synthetic protocol for N/S-difunctionalized product 10 represents significant advantages over previously reported methods,24 including eco-friendliness, short reaction period, high yields, easy workup, and high regioselectivity.
| a Reaction conditions: a mixture of 5(a–b) (1.0 mmol) and 3(a–i) (1.0 mmol) in the presence of NBS in 10.0 mL ethanol was reacted. |
|---|
![]() |
(b) The possible mechanistic pathway for the regioselective synthesis of (3-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]thiazol-2-yl)(aryl)methanone 6(a–n) is depicted in Scheme 4b. Initially, under the influence of visible light, homonuclear fission occurs in both the S–H bond of 2-mercaptobenzimidazole 5 and the C–Br bond of 2-bromo-1,3-diketones 4, leading to the formation of free radicals E and F, respectively, which mutually share their electrons to form the S-alkylated intermediate A. Subsequently, the bromine free radical initiates the homolytic cleavage of the N–H bond, leading to the formation of a new N-benzimidazole radical. This radical, in conjunction with the less sterically hindered carbonyl carbon and an oxygen atom, forms a stable complex, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-2,3-dihydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo-[2,1-b]thiazol-2-yl)(aryl)methanone D, which finally undergoes dehydration to yield exclusive final cyclized product 6.
To support the proposed reaction mechanism, controlled experiments with radical initiation and trapping were systematically conducted. Under standard conditions, the addition of free radical initiator benzoyl peroxide26,27 significantly enhanced the reaction yield (6a; 92%) and a better reaction rate. In contrast, the introduction of radical scavenger TEMPO28,29 to the reaction mixture resulted in notable inhibition, yielding only 18% of product 6a. These results strongly suggest a free radical pathway involvement, with benzoyl peroxide improving and TEMPO inhibiting the reaction. However, solvent-free controlled experiments showed no significant impact on reaction yield and rate, supporting the proposed ionic mechanism for product formation.
1,3-Diketones were synthesized using methods described in the literature.20 Commercially available 2-mercaptobenzimidazole (Avra Chemicals, India) and NBS (Avra Chemicals, India) were used without any purification.
:
80, v/v). Excess ethanol was removed under reduced pressure and the reaction mixture was neutralized with aqueous sodium bicarbonate. The obtained solid products 6(a–n) were recrystallized using ethanol and dried, yielding high-purity products.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 8.04–8.02 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.86–7.84 (m, 2H, 2′,6′-H), 7.75–7.70 (m, 2H, 4′,7H), 7.62–7.58 (m, 2H, 3′,5′-H), 7.45–7.41 (m, 1H, 6H), 7.34–7.31 (m, 1H, 5H), 2.73 (s, 3H, 3-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 189.3, 154.8, 148.8, 139.9, 138.7, 133.4, 130.8, 129.3, 129.2, 125.0, 122.0, 121.7, 119.2, 113.4, 15.7; anal. calcd. for C17H12N2OS: C, 69.84; H, 4.14; N, 9.58% found: C, 69.80; H, 4.11; N, 9.53%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 8.04–8.02 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.98–7.94 (m, 2H, 2′,6′-H), 7.75–7.73 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.46–7.40 (m, 3H, 3′,5′,6H), 7.35–7.30 (m, 1H, 5H), 2.74 (s, 3H, 3-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 187.8, 166.5, 164.0, 154.8, 148.8, 139.8, 135.2 (d, 3JCF = 12 Hz), 132.4 (d, 2JCF = 36 Hz), 132.3, 130.8, 125.0, 122.0, 121.4, 119.2, 116.5, 116.3, 113.3, 15.8; 19F NMR (376 MHz) δ (ppm) −105.5.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 8.04–8.02 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.88–7.86 (m, 2H, 2′,6′-H), 7.78–7.76 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.48–7.46 (m, 2H, 3′,5′-H), 7.44–7.42 (m, 1H, 6H), 7.35–7.32 (m, 1H, 5H), 2.80 (s, 3H, 3-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 187.5, 153.8, 147.6, 141.2, 138.6, 131.5, 131.2, 130.4, 128.2, 124.9, 121.9, 120.9, 119.1, 112.9, 15.4; anal. calcd. for C17H11ClN2OS: C, 62.48; H, 3.39; N, 8.57% found: C, 62.40; H, 3.33; N, 8.48%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 8.04–8.02 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.84–7.78 (m, 4H, 2′,3′,5′,6′-H), 7.75–7.73 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.46–7.42 (m, 1H, 6H), 7.35–7.31 (m, 1H, 5H), 2.74 (s, 3H, 3-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 188.2, 154.8, 148.8, 140.1, 137.7, 132.4, 131.3, 130.8, 127.4, 125.0, 122.0, 121.3, 119.3, 113.4, 15.8; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C17H11BrN2OS: 370.9831 [M + H]+, 372.9811 [M + H + 2]+ (1
:
1); anal. calcd. for C17H11BrN2OS: C, 55.00; H, 2.99; N, 7.55% found: C, 54.93; H, 2.91; N, 7.50%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 8.01–7.99 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.1 Hz, 4H), 7.77–7.74 (m, 2H, 2′,6′-H), 7.74–7.72 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.44–7.39 (m, 3H, 3′,5′,6H), 7.33–7.29 (m, 1H, 5H), 2.73 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3), 2.43 (s, 3H, 3-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 188.7, 154.8, 148.8, 144.0, 139.3, 135.9, 130.8, 129.8, 129.5, 124.9, 121.9, 121.6, 119.2, 113.3, 21.7, 15.7; anal. calcd. for C18H14N2OS: C, 70.56; H, 4.61; N, 9.14% found: C, 70.51; H, 4.55; N, 9.10%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 8.05–8.03 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.90–7.87 (d, 2H, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.75–7.73 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.45–7.41 (t, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 6H), 7.34–7.30 (t, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 5H), 7.13–7.11 (d, 2H, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 3.89 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3), 2.77 (s, 3H, 3-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 187.6, 163.8, 154.8, 148.8, 138.6, 132.1, 130.8, 124.8, 121.9, 121.5, 119.2, 114.6, 113.3, 56.2, 15.8; anal. calcd. for C18H14N2O2S: C, 67.06; H, 4.38; N, 8.69% found: C, 67.01; H, 4.33; N, 8.61%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 8.04–8.02 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.75–7.73 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.53–7.49 (m, 1H, 5′-H), 7.45–7.40 (m, 2H, 6,6′-H), 7.36–7.30 (m, 2H, 5,2′-H), 7.28–7.26 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, J = 2.0 Hz, 4′-H), 3.84 (s, 3H, 3′-OCH3), 2.73 (s, 3H, 3-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 189.0, 159.8, 154.9, 148.8, 140.1, 130.8, 130.6, 125.0, 121.9, 121.7, 121.4, 119.6, 119.2, 113.7, 113.4, 56.0, 15.8; anal. calcd. for C18H14N2O2S: C, 67.06; H, 4.38; N, 8.69% found: C, 66.98; H, 4.30; N, 8.58%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 8.19–8.17 (dd, 1H, J = 5.2 Hz, J = 1.1 Hz, 3′-H), 8.09–8.07 (m, 2H, 4,5′-H), 7.76–7.74 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.47–7.43 (m, 1H, 6H), 7.37–7.33 (m, 2H, 5,4′-H), 2.98 (s, 3H, 6-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 179.6, 154.5, 148.7, 143.2, 139.3, 136.7, 135.7, 130.7, 129.4, 125.0, 122.0, 119.2, 118.8, 113.4, 15.5; anal. calcd. for C15H10N2OS2: C, 60.38; H, 3.38; N, 9.39% found: C, 60.30; H, 3.33; N, 9.35%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.96–7.92 (m, 2H, 2′,6′-H), 7.87–7.84 (m, 1H, 4H), 7.60–7.58 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.44–7.40 (m, 2H, 3′,5′-H), 7.12–7.10 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 6H), 2.71 (s, 3H, 3-CH3), 2.47 (s, 3H, 5-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 187.8, 164.0, 154.1, 149.1, 146.9, 139.8, 135.3–135.2 (d, 3JCF = 12 Hz), 132.4–132.3 (d, 2JCF = 36 Hz), 131.5, 130.9, 126.3, 121.0, 118.8, 116.5, 116.3, 113.2, 21.7, 15.1; 19F NMR (376 MHz) δ (ppm) −103.9.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.88–7.84 (m, 3H, 4,2′,6′-H), 7.66–7.64 (d, 2H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.52–7.51 (m, 1H, 7H), 7.13–7.11 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 6H), 2.69 (s, 3H, 3-CH3), 2.45 (s, 3H, 5-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 188.0, 154.7, 149.3, 140.0, 138.3, 137.4, 134.6, 131.2, 129.5, 128.8, 123.3, 121.1, 119.1, 112.8, 21.7, 15.7; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C18H13ClN2OS: 341.0503 [M + H]+, 343.0514 [M + H + 2]+ (3
:
1); anal. calcd. for C18H13ClN2OS: C, 63.43; H, 3.84; N, 8.22% found: C, 63.39; H, 3.75; N, 8.16%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.87–7.85 (m, 1H, 4H), 7.76–7.73 (m, 2H, 2′,6′-H), 7.60–7.58 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.40–7.38 (d, 2H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.13–7.11 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 6H), 2.70 (s, 3H, 3-CH3), 2.45 (s, 3H, 5-CH3), 2.43 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 189.3, 154.8, 148.8, 139.9, 138.7, 133.8, 130.8, 129.2, 125.6, 122.5, 120.7, 118.5, 112.5, 21.1, 15.1, 15.0; anal. calcd. for C19H16N2OS: C, 71.22; H, 5.03; N, 8.74% found: C, 71.16; H, 4.99; N, 8.69%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.88–7.86 (d, 2H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.84–7.83 (m, 1H, 4H), 7.61–7.59 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.25–7.23 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 6H), 7.12–7.10 (d, 2H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 3.88 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3), 2.75 (s, 3H, 3-CH3), 2.48 (s, 3H, 5-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 187.0, 163.2, 153.6, 146.3, 138.0, 131.5, 130.8, 130.4, 130.3, 125.6, 120.5, 118.2, 114.0, 112.5, 55.6, 21.2, 15.2; anal. calcd. for C19H16N2O2S: C, 67.84; H, 4.79; N, 8.33% found: C, 67.76; H, 4.77; N, 8.28%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.90–7.88 (m, 1H, 5′-H), 7.53–7.48 (m, 2H, 6′,6H), 7.40–7.39 (m, 1H, 4H), 7.35–7.34 (m, 1H, 2′-H), 7.27–7.25 (m, 1H, 4′-H), 7.15–7.13 (m, 1H, 7H), 3.84 (s, 3H, 3′-OCH3), 2.71 (s, 3H, 3-CH3), 2.46 (s, 3H, 5-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 188.4, 159.2, 154.2, 148.6, 139.6, 139.5, 134.0, 130.0, 128.3, 122.6, 120.8, 118.9, 118.5, 113.1, 112.3, 55.4, 21.2, 15.1; anal. calcd. for C19H16N2O2S: C, 67.84; H, 4.79; N, 8.33% found: C, 67.77; H, 4.79; N, 8.30%.
O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.86–7.84 (m, 1H, 6′-H), 7.63–7.58 (m, 2H, 4′,6H), 7.44–7.41 (m, 1H, 4H), 7.25–7.23 (m, 2H, 3′,5′-H), 7.15–7.11 (m, 1H, 7H), 3.80 (s, 3H, 2′-OCH3), 2.63 (s, 3H, 3-CH3), 2.46 (s, 3H, 5-CH3); 13C NMR (101 MHz) δ (ppm) 188.4, 156.8, 140.1, 134.6, 133.3, 133.2, 131.5, 128.8, 126.4, 123.7, 121.4, 118.8, 113.3, 112.5, 56.3, 21.7, 14.1; anal. calcd. for C19H16N2O2S: C, 67.84; H, 4.79; N, 8.33% found: C, 67.74; H, 4.75; N, 8.25%.
:
80, v/v). After completion, 30 mL of saturated sodium bicarbonate solution was added and the mixture was filtered to obtain the crude solid. N/S-difunctionalized benzimidazole derivatives 10(a–e), were recrystallized from ethanol and dried, yielding high-purity products.
O), 1670 cm−1 (C
O); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.11–8.09 (m, 2H, 2′,6′-H), 7.63–7.60 (m, 2H, 4,7H), 7.54–7.50 (m, 3H, 3′,4′,5′-H), 7.30–7.25 (m, 2H, 5,6H), 4.85 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.81 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (126 MHz) δ (ppm) 193.9, 168.8, 154.3, 144.0, 136.1, 133.6, 133.2, 128.8, 128.6, 124.6, 123.6, 119.1, 113.2, 40.5, 26.2; anal. calcd. for C17H14N2O2S: C, 65.79; H, 4.55; N, 9.03% found: C, 65.73; H, 4.50; N, 9.00%.
O), 1690 cm−1 (C
O); 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 8.06–8.04 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.98–7.93 (m, 2H, 2′,6′-H), 7.77–7.75 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.47–7.41 (m, 3H, 3′,5′,6H), 7.36–7.32 (m, 1H, 5H), 5.65 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.74 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (126 MHz) δ (ppm) 187.3, 166.0, 154.2, 147.7, 139.2, 134.6 (d, 3JCF = 12 Hz), 131.9–131.8 (d, 2JCF = 40 Hz), 130.2, 124.6, 121.6, 118.5, 116.0, 115.8, 112.9, 38.8, 15.3; 19F NMR (376 MHz) δ (ppm) −110.1.
O), 1692 cm−1 (C
O); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.07–8.05 (d, 1H, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 7H), 7.98–7.95 (m, 2H, 2′,6′-H), 7.77–7.75 (d, 1H, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 4H), 7.44–7.38 (m, 3H, 3′,5′,6H), 7.34–7.32 (m, 1H, 5H), 5.51 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.75 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (126 MHz) δ (ppm) 187.8, 154.7, 148.2, 139.8, 132.4, 132.2, 130.7, 125.1, 122.1, 119.1, 116.6, 116.3, 113.4, 39.4, 15.8; anal. calcd. for C17H13ClN2O2S: C, 59.22; H, 3.80; N, 8.12% found: C, 59.18; H, 3.08; N, 8.05%.
O), 1680 cm−1 (C
O); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.04–8.02 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 7H), 7.78–7.76 (m, 2H, 2′,6′-H), 7.75–7.74 (m, 1H, 4H), 7.43–7.40 (m, 2H, 3′,5′-H), 7.34–7.32 (m, 1H, 6H), 6.91–6.90 (m, 1H, 5H), 5.65 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.75 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.44 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3); 13C NMR (126 MHz) δ (ppm) 188.8, 154.8, 148.8, 144.0, 139.3, 135.9, 130.8, 129.8, 129.5, 124.9, 121.9, 119.2, 113.3, 39.4, 21.7, 15.7; HRMS (ESI) m/z for C18H13FN2OS: 325.0997 [M + H]+; anal. calcd. for C18H16N2O2S: C, 66.65; H, 4.97; N, 8.64% found: C, 66.62; H, 4.91; N, 8.60%.
O), 1680 cm−1 (C
O); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.10–8.08 (d, 2H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.64–7.63 (m, 1H, 7H), 7.56–7.54 (m, 1H, 4 H), 7.31–7.24 (m, 2H, 5,6H), 6.98–6.96 (d, 2H, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 4.83 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.89 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3), 2.82 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (126 MHz) δ (ppm) 192.2, 168.7, 163.9, 154.3, 143.9, 133.2, 130.9, 128.9, 124.5, 123.5, 119.0, 113.8, 113.2, 55.5, 40.3, 26.2; anal. calcd. for C18H16N2O3S: C, 63.51; H, 4.74; N, 8.23% found: C, 63.48; H, 4.71; N, 8.20%.Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: The supporting information consists of additional experimental data (1H, 13C, HMBC, HSQC NMR and HRMS spectra) for final compounds. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra02681d |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |