Huidong Li*ab,
Jinfeng Luoa,
Haoyu Chena,
Ruilin Lua,
Yucheng Hua,
Huijie Wanga,
Yanshu Wanga,
Qunchao Fan*a,
R. Bruce King*b and
Henry F. Schaefer III
b
aSchool of Science, Key Laboratory of High Performance Scientific Computation, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
bCenter for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA. E-mail: rbking@chem.uga.edu; huidongli@mail.xhu.edu.cn
First published on 24th February 2025
The structures and energetics of the binuclear cyclopentadienylmetal alkyne systems Cp2M2C2R2 (M = Ni, Co, Fe; R = Me and NMe2) have been investigated using density functional theory. For the Cp2M2C2(NMe2)2 (M = Ni, Co, Fe) systems the relative energies of isomeric tetrahedrane Cp2M2(alkyne) structures having intact alkyne ligands and alkyne dichotomy structures Cp2M2(CNMe2)2 in which the CC triple bond of the alkyne has broken completely to give separate Me2NC units depending on the central metal atoms. For the nickel system Cp2Ni2C2(NMe2)2 as well as the related nickel systems Cp2Ni2(MeC2NMe2) and Cp2Ni2C2Me2 the tetrahedrane structures are clearly preferred energetically consistent with the experimental syntheses of several stable Cp2Ni2(alkyne) complexes. The tetrahedrane and alkyne dichotomy structures have similar energies for the Cp2Co2C2(NMe2)2 system whereas the alkyne dichotomy structures are significantly energetically preferred for the Cp2Fe2C2(NMe2)2 system. The potential energy surfaces for the Cp2M2(MeC2NMe2) and Cp2M2C2Me2 systems (M = Co, Fe) are complicated by low-energy structures in which hydrogen migration occurs from the alkyne methyl groups to one or both alkyne carbon atoms to give Cp2M2(C3H3NMe2) and Cp2M2(C3H3Me) derivatives with bridging metalallylic ligands, Cp2M2(CH2
C
CHNMe2) and Cp2M2(CH2
C
CHMe) with bridging allene ligands, as well as Cp2M2(CH2
CH–CNMe2) and Cp2M2(CH2
CH–CHMe) with bridging vinylcarbene ligands. For the Cp2M2C2Me2 (M = Co, Fe) systems migration of a hydrogen atom from each methyl group to an alkyne carbon atom can give relatively low-energy Cp2M2(CH2
CH–CH
CH2) structures with a bridging butadiene ligand. Five transition states have been identified in a proposed mechanism for the conversion of the Cp2Co2/MeC
CNMe2 system to the cobaltallylic complex Cp2Co2(C3H3NMe2) with intermediates having agostic C–H–Co interactions and an activation energy barrier sequence of 13.1, 17.0, 15.2, and 12.0 kcal mol−1.
Reactions of iron carbonyls with alkynes typically require more vigorous conditions and lead to more complicated product mixtures. Dominant in such reaction mixtures are iron carbonyl complexes of ligands formed by the cyclization of two or three alkyne units including cyclobutadiene, cyclopentadienone, tropone, and ferracyclopentadiene (ferrole) ligands.10 However, such alkyne oligomerizations are inhibited by bulky substituents. Thus among the products obtained from iron carbonyls and di-tert-butylacetylene is t-Bu2C2Fe2(CO)6, shown by X-ray crystallography to have a central Fe2C2 tetrahedron similar to that in the (alkyne)Co2(CO)6 derivatives (Fig. 1).11 The FeFe distance of 2.316 Å in this Fe2C2 tetrahedron is ∼0.13 Å shorter than the Co–Co single bond distance of 2.462 Å in the analogous tBu2C2Co2(CO)6. This suggests the formal Fe
Fe double bond in t-Bu2C2Fe2(CO)6 required to give each iron atom the favored 18-electron configuration.
Alkyne oligomerization to give cyclic ligands in the iron carbonyl system can also be inhibited by dialkylamino substituents. Thus the reaction of Et2NCCNEt2 with iron carbonyls12 was found to give a product of stoichiometry (Et2NC)2Fe2(CO)6 shown by X-ray crystallography to contain two separate Et2NC diethylaminocarbyne units resulting from complete breaking of the C
C triple bond in the original alkyne in a process known as dichotomy (Fig. 1).13 Each Et2NC unit contributes three electrons to the central Fe2 unit so an Fe–Fe single bond in (Et2NC)2Fe2(CO)6 is sufficient to give each iron atom the favored 18-electron configuration. A density functional theory study has shown how dialkylamino substituents can favor alkyne dichotomy as compared with alkyl substituents without any donor atoms such as nitrogen.14
The robustness of the metal-cyclopentadienyl linkage makes CpM (Cp = η5-C5H5) units good building blocks for transition metal complexes of diverse types that are likely to be more stable than their metal carbonyl counterparts. In this connection the CpNi unit is isoelectronic and isolobal with the Co(CO)3 unit. Thus it is not surprising that several stable Cp2Ni2(alkyne) complexes have been synthesized by reactions of Cp2Ni2(CO)2 with alkynes.15–17 Similarly, the chemistry of Cp2Co2(alkyne) derivatives might be expected to parallel that of (alkyne)Fe2(CO)6 derivatives. However, Cp2Co2(alkyne) derivatives have not yet been synthesized since reactions of CpCo(CO)2 with alkynes typically lead to alkyne cyclodimerization to give very stable CpCo(cyclobutadiene) derivatives or to alkyne cyclotrimerization to give benzene derivatives.18
Extending the isolobal analogy further suggests analogy between the chemistry of (alkyne)Mn2(CO)6 and Cp2Fe2(alkyne) derivatives. However, the alkyne chemistry of manganese carbonyl, which is of more recent origin than that of cobalt and iron carbonyls, follows a different pattern involving carbonyl richer systems. This reflects the need for each manganese atom to acquire two more ligand electrons than a cobalt atom to attain the favored 18-electron configuration. Thus the experimentally known diallkylaminoacetylene derivatives (Et2NC2NEt2)Mn2(CO)8, (Et2NC2Me)Mn2(CO)8, and (Me2NC2Ph)Mn2(CO)8 are all examples of (alkyne)Mn2(CO)8 derivatives with central Mn2C2 tetrahedrane units analogous to the (alkyne)Co2(CO)6 derivatives but with one additional carbonyl group on each manganese atom.12 This original work on alkyne manganese carbonyl chemistry focused on alkynes with dialkylamino substituents. Later the manganese carbonyl chemistry of alkynes with methyl substituents was found to be complicated by hydrogen migration from the methyl group to one or both alkyne carbon atoms to give species with bridging allene or manganallyl units (Fig. 2).19
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Products formed by hydrogen migration from Mn2(CO)8(MeC2NEt2) structurally characterized by X-ray crystallography.19 |
We report here comprehensive density functional theory studies on Cp2M2(alkyne) (M = Ni, Co, Fe) systems with the three alkynes Me2NCCNMe2, MeC
CNMe2, and MeC
CMe having the objective of guiding future experimental work in this area. In addition, our theoretical studies provide insight into hydrogen migration processes in alkyne metal carbonyl chemistry by suggesting a new mechanism for hydrogen migration in the Cp2Co2(MeC2NMe2) system. The systems having dimethylamino substituents on the alkyne carbon atoms were chosen to avoid the complication of possible hydrogen migration from methyl groups directly bonded to an alkyne carbon as observed experimentally for the manganese carbonyl derivatives.19 The nickel derivatives Cp2Ni2(alkyne) are of interest both by being known experimentally15–17 as well as by being analogues of the extensive series of (alkyne)Co2(CO)6 derivatives.1–3 Analogy between the experimentally still unknown Cp2Co2(alkyne) systems and the (alkyne)Fe2(CO)6 systems suggest the possibility of alkyne dichotomy in low-energy Cp2Co2(alkyne) structures, particularly those with dialkylamino substituents.
The geometries of all structures were edited by hand starting from an XRD template and fully optimized by using the above DFT method with the (120, 974) integration grid. Small imaginary frequencies for the optimized structures were assumed to originate from numerical integration errors. Each structure is designated as mN–M–nX, where M is the symbol of the transition metal atom, m is the number of dimethylamino groups, n is the order of the structure in a sequence of increasing relative energies predicted by the M06-L/DZP method, and X designates the spin states, using S and T for singlets and triplets, respectively. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) value suggesting the structural difference of some singlet and triplet structural pairs were calculated by the RMSD code.33 Only the energies predicted by the M06-L/DZP method and ωB97xD/DZP method are reported in the text. The distances (in Ångstroms) displayed in each figure are predicted by the M06-L/DZP method.
The next higher energy Cp2Ni2C2(NMe2)2 structure 2N–Ni–2T, lying 13.6 kcal mol−1 above 2N–Ni–1S, appears to be a triplet excited state of 2N–Ni–1S (Fig. 4). The increase in the Ni–Ni distance in going from 2.303 Å in the singlet 2N–Ni–1S to 2.353 Å in the corresponding triplet 2N–Ni–2T is surprisingly small. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) was predicted to be 0.254 Å between the singlet 2N–Ni–1S and the triplet 2N–Ni–2T.
The Cp2Ni2C2(NMe2)2 structure 2N–Ni–3S, lying 24.2 kcal mol−1 above the lowest energy structure 2N–Ni–1S, has a different coordination environment. In 2N–Ni–3S one nickel atom is bonded to both alkyne carbon atoms with nickel-carbon distances of 1.899 Å and 1.779 Å corresponding to formal Ni–C single and Ni=C double bonds, respectively. The other nickel atom is connected to only one alkyne carbon atom with a Ni–C distance of 1.857 Å corresponding to a formal single bond but also to a nitrogen atom through a dative N→Ni bond of length 1.923 Å. The long Ni⋯Ni distance of 3.491 Å in 2N–Ni–3S indicates the lack of a nickel–nickel bond. However, since each nickel atom receives three electrons from the alkyne ligand, each nickel atom has the favored 18-electron configuration.
The Cp2Ni2C2(NMe2)2 structure 2N–Ni–4S is a different type of dichotomy structure, with two separate three-electron donor Me2NC dimethylaminocarbyne units bridging the nickel atoms with the carbyne carbon atom of such unit forming a Ni–C bond to each nickel atom (Fig. 4). Thus 2N–Ni–4S has similar stereochemistry of the central Ni2C2 unit to that of the central Fe2C2 unit in the experimental (Et2NC)2Fe2(CO)6 dichotomy structure (Fig. 1)13 except for a relatively long Ni⋯Ni distance of 2.911 Å suggesting the absence of a direct nickel–nickel bond. This is consistent with the 18-electron configuration of each nickel atom in a dimethylaminocarbyne structure Cp2Ni2(CNMe2)2 without a direct nickel–nickel bond.
For the cobalt system Cp2Co2C2(NMe2)2 the tetrahedrane and dichotomy structures are spaced very close in energy with the dichotomy structure 2N–Co–1S lying only 2.6 kcal mol−1 and 1.9 kcal mol−1 below the singlet and triplet tetrahedrane structures 2N–Co–3S and 2N–Co–2T, respectively (Fig. 5). In the dichotomy structure 2N–Co–1S each of the separate bridging Me2NC carbyne units donates three electrons to the central Co2 unit. The Co–Co distance in 2N–Co–1S of 2.351 Å suggests the formal single bond required to give each cobalt atom the favored 18-electron configuration. Structure 2N–Co–1S is thus the analogue of the experimentally known and structurally characterized (Et2NC)2Fe2(CO)6 (Fig. 1)11 in which each Fe(CO)3 unit has been replaced by an isoelectronic CpCo unit. The CoCo distance of 2.233 Å in the singlet tetrahedrane structure 2N–Co–3S is ∼0.1 Å shorter than the Co–Co distance in the dichotomy structure 2N–Co–1S as well as the Ni–Ni single bond distance in the tetrahedrane structure 2N–Ni–1S. Interpretation of the Co
Co distance in 2N–Co–3S as a formal double bond gives each cobalt atom the favored 18-electron configuration. Thus 2N–Co–3S is thus an analogue of the experimentally known iron tetrahedrane complex11 (tBu2C2)Fe2(CO)6 in which each Fe(CO)3 unit has been replaced by an isoelectronic CpCo unit. The Co
Co distance of 2.301 Å in the triplet tetrahedrane structure 2N–Co–2T is essentially identical to that in the singlet analogue 2N–Co–3S and thus can likewise be interpreted as a double bond thereby giving each cobalt the favored 18-electron configuration as in 2N–Co–3S. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) was predicted to be 0.235 Å between the singlet 2N–Co–3S and the triplet 2N–Co–2T. The Co
Co double bond in the triplet 2N–Co–2T is of the σ + 2/2 π type with two orthogonal one-electron π-components similar to the Fe
Fe double bond in the triplet state organometallic35 Cp2Fe2(μ-CO)3 or normal dioxygen. The two singlet isomers 2N–Co–1s and 2N–Co–3S can interchange mutually by overcoming a very low activation energy barrier of ∼6.0 kcal mol−1 (Fig. 6).
Two higher energy Cp2Co2C2(NMe2)2 structures are of interest (Fig. 5). The singlet structure 2N–Co–4S, lying 18.2 kcal mol−1 in energy above 2N–Co–1S, has an intact Me2NCCNMe2 ligand functioning as a six-electron donor by bonding to the central Co2 unit through both π-components of its C
C triple bond as well as through an N→Co dative bond of length 1.979 Å from one of the amino nitrogen atoms. The Co–Co distance of 2.631 Å in 2N–Co–4S is 0.3 to 0.4 Å longer than those in three lower energy Cp2Co2C2(NMe2)2 isomers in Fig. 5 and thus can be interpreted as a formal single bond. Such a Co–Co single bond is sufficient to give each cobalt atom in 2N–Co–4S the favored 18-electron configuration with a six-electron rather than four-electron donor bridging alkyne ligand. The other higher energy Cp2Co2C2(NMe2)2 structure 2N–Co–5T, lying 24.6 kcal mol−1 in energy above 2N–Co–1s, is a triplet dichotomy structure related to the singlet dichotomy structure 2N–Co–1s but with a significantly longer Co–Co distance of 2.542 Å. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) was predicted to be 0.651 Å between the singlet 2N–Co–1s and the triplet 2N–Co–5T. The triplet spin state of 2N–Co–5T suggests that the two cobalt atoms are squeezed to a normally bonding distance by the geometry of the two bridging dimethylaminocarbyne ligands but are not able to form a bond instead retaining an unpaired electron on each cobalt atom.
The iron system Cp2Fe2C2(NMe2)2 is the reverse of the nickel system since both the singlet and triplet dichotomy structures, 2N–Fe–1S and 2N–Fe–2T, respectively, are the lowest energy structures by substantial margins greater than 11 kcal mol−1 (Fig. 7). The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) was predicted to be 0.255 Å between 2N–Fe–1S and 2N–Fe–2T. The FeFe distance of 2.335 Å in 2N–Fe–1S and 2.350 Å in 2N–Fe–2T both can be considered as the formal double bonds required to give each iron atom the favored 18-electron configuration. In the singlet 2N–Fe–1S the Fe
Fe double bond is of the normal σ + π type similar to that in ethylene. However, in the triplet 2N–Fe–2T the Fe
Fe double bond is of the σ + 2/2π type similar to that in the organometallic35 Cp2Fe2(μ-CO)3 or dioxygen.
The higher energy Cp2Fe2C2(NMe2)2 structure 2N–Fe–3S, lying 13.3 kcal mol−1 above 2N–Fe–1S, has a tetrahedrane-like geometry but with a relatively long C–C distance of 1.691 Å suggesting a very weak interaction and a relatively short iron–iron distance of 2.268 Å approaching a formal triple bond. These C–C and FeFe distances suggest a resonance hybrid between a tetrahedrane and a dichotomy structure with both canonical forms having the favored 18-electron configuration for each iron atom.
The remaining two high-energy Cp2Fe2C2(NMe2)2 structures, namely 2N–Fe–4T and 2N–Fe–5S lying 15.2 and 17.6 kcal mol−1 above 2N–Fe–1S, respectively, each have a six-electron donor alkyne ligand using both π-components of the CC bond as well as a nitrogen lone pair through a dative N→Fe bond similar to the alkyne ligand in 2N–Co–4S (Fig. 7). Interpreting the 2.560 Å Fe–Fe distance in the triplet structure 2N–Fe–4T as a formal single bond gives each iron atom a 17-electron configuration consistent with a binuclear triplet. The 2.478 Å of Fe
Fe distance in the singlet 2N–Fe–5S is ∼0.1 Å shorter than that in the otherwise similar 2N–Fe–4T and thus can be interpreted as the formal double bond required to give each iron atom the favored 18-electron configuration.
![]() | ||
Fig. 8 Structure types formed by hydrogen migration from methyl groups in methylalkynes (a to d); an observed sandwich-type structure (e). |
Consider first binuclear cyclopentadienylmetal complexes of the type Cp2M2(MeC2NMe2) (M = Ni, Co, Fe) having one methyl substituent on the alkyne ligand to provide a source of hydrogen atoms for migration to one or both alkyne carbon atoms (Fig. 8). Such hydrogen migration reactions can lead to complexes having bridging dimethylamino four-electron donor vinylcarbene (CH2CH–CNMe2) ligands, four-electron donor metalallylic ligands (C3H3NMe2), and four-electron donor allene ligands (CH2
C=CHNMe2). For the nickel system Cp2Ni2(MeC2NMe2) the tetrahedrane structure 1N–Ni–1S having an intact alkyne ligand with no hydrogen migration remains the lowest energy structure with an Ni–Ni distance of 2.293 Å (Fig. 9) that is close to the Ni–Ni distance of 2.303 Å in the Cp2Ni2C2(NMe2)2 structure 2N–Ni–1S discussed above (Fig. 4). However, 1N–Ni–2S with a bridging four-electron donor vinylcarbene ligand formed by a single hydrogen migration and a Ni–Ni single bond distance of 2.382 Å lies only 9.2 kcal mol−1 in energy above 1N–Ni–1S. A triplet version of the vinylcarbene complex, namely 1N–Ni–3T with a longer Ni–Ni distance of 2.536 Å, lies 12.5 kcal mol−1 above 1N–Ni–1S. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) was predicted to be 0.348 Å between the singlet 1N–Ni–2S and the triplet 1N–Ni–3T.
The singlet structure 1N–Ni–4S, lying 14.0 kcal mol−1 in energy above 1N–Ni–1S, has a six-electron donor bridging nickelallyllic ligand formed by double hydrogen migration bonded to the central Ni2 unit similar to the manganallyllic ligand found in the experimentally known (MeC2NEt2)Mn2(CO)7 complex.19 In 1N–Ni–4S the nickelallyllic ligand is bonded to one CpNi unit as a trihapto ligand forming three Ni–C bonds and to the other CpNi unit by forming one dative N→Ni bond and one Ni–C bond. This configuration of bonds gives each nickel atom the favored 18-electron configuration without the need for a Ni–Ni bond. This is consistent with the relatively long Ni⋯Ni non-bonding distance of 2.888 Å in 1N–Ni–4S suggesting the lack of a direct nickel–nickel bond.
Structures with hydrogen migration in the cobalt system Cp2Co2(MeC2NMe2) are predicted to have significantly lower energies than either the tetrahedrane or dichotomy isomers. Thus the lowest energy Cp2Co2(MeC2NMe2) structure 1N–Co–1S has a six-electron donor bridging cobaltallylic ligand bonded to the central Co2 unit similar to the nickelallylic ligand in 1N–Ni–4S or the manganallylic ligand in the experimentally known19 (MeC2NEt2)Mn2(CO)7 complex (Fig. 10). The Co–Co distance of 2.437 Å in 1N–Co–1S is clearly a bonding distance corresponding to the formal single bond that is required to give each cobalt atom the favored 18-electron configuration. This contrasts with 1N–Ni–4S having the same type of metalallyllic ligand but with the much longer Ni⋯Ni distance of 2.888 Å where no nickel–nickel bond is needed to give each nickel atom the favored 18-electron configuration.
The next lower energy Cp2Co2(MeC2NMe2) structure is the triplet 1N–Co–2T, lying 11.5 kcal mol−1 above 1N–Co–1S (Fig. 10). Structure 1N–Co–2T has a bridging vinylcarbene ligand similar to that in 1N–Ni–2S with a similar metal–metal bonding distance of 2.357 Å. However, since cobalt has one less electron than nickel, each cobalt atom in 1N–Co–2T has only a 17-electron configuration consistent with its triplet spin state. The next Cp2Co2(MeC2NMe2) structure 1N–Co–3T, lying 12.0 kcal mol−1 in energy above 1N–Co–1S, is a triplet version of 1N–Co–1S. The Co–Co distance of 2.717 Å in 1N–Co–3T is ∼0.3 Å longer than that of 2.437 Å in 1N–Co–1S implying the lack of a significant Co⋯Co interaction similar to the situation in 1N–Ni–4S. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) was predicted to be 0.254 Å between the singlet 1N–Co–1S and the triplet 1N–Co–3T.
The lowest energy Cp2Co2(MeC2NMe2) structure with an intact alkyne ligand without hydrogen migration and thus with a central Co2C2 tetrahedron, namely 1N–Co–4T at 12.6 kcal mol−1 above 1N–Co–1S, is also a triplet state structure. The Co–Co distance of 2.284 Å in 1N–Co–4T is essentially identical to the Ni–Ni distance of 2.293 Å in 1N–Ni–1S. However, the WBI value of 0.84 for 1N–Co–4T is larger than of that of 0.72 for 1N–Ni–1S, suggesting a σ + 2/2π type double bond. This gives each cobalt atom in 1N–Co–4T an 18-electron configuration consistent with its triplet spin state.
The lowest energy Cp2Fe2(MeC2NMe2) structure is a triplet structure 1N–Fe–1T with a six-electron donor bridging ferrallylic ligand similar to 1N–Co–3T (Fig. 10) and 1N–Ni–4S (Fig. 9). The WBI value for the Fe–Fe distance of 2.372 Å in 1N–Fe–1T is 0.92, which is much larger than that of 0.62 in 1N–Co–1S, suggesting a σ + 2/2π type double bond. This gives each iron atom in 1N–Fe–1T an 18-electron configuration consistent with its triplet spin state.
Hydrogen migration does not play a role in the next three Cp2Fe2(MeC2NMe2) structures in terms of relative energies (Fig. 11). Structures 1N–Fe–2S and 1N–Fe–4T, lying 3.5 kcal mol−1 and 11.0 kcal mol−1 in energy, respectively, above 1N–Fe–1T, are alkyne dichotomy structures completely analogous to the lowest energy Cp2Fe2C2(NMe2)2 structures 2N–Fe–1S and 2N–Fe–2T with very similar FeFe double bond distances. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) was predicted to be 0.104 Å between the singlet 1N–Fe–2S and the triplet 1N–Fe–4T. Structure 1N–Fe–3T, lying 5.2 kcal mol−1 above 1N–Fe–1T in energy, is a triplet tetrahedrane structure. Interpreting the Fe
Fe distance of 2.332 Å as a formal double bond gives each iron atom the 17-electron configuration for a binuclear triplet.
The nickel system is the only one of the three Cp2M2C2Me2 (M = Ni, Co, Fe) systems that has a reasonably simple potential energy surface (Fig. 12). The lowest energy Cp2Ni2C2Me2 structure by more than 13 kcal mol−1 (M06-L) is the alkyne complex 0N–Ni–1S with a central Ni2C2 tetrahedrane unit similar to numerous experimentally known Cp2Ni2(alkyne) complexes.15–17 The next Cp2Ni2C2Me2 isomer in terms of relative energy, namely 0N–Ni–2T, can be regarded as the triplet excited state of 0N–Ni–1S with similar geometry. The next three structures in terms of energy, namely the singlet structures 0N–Ni–3S, 0N–Ni–4S, and 0N–Ni–5S lying 15.8, 15.8, and 18.7 kcal mol−1, respectively, above 0N–Ni–1S have bridging vinylcarbene, methylallene, and butadiene units, respectively. The butadiene derivative 0N–Ni–5S does not have an agostic C–H–Ni interaction since a four-electron donor butadiene ligand without any such agostic interactions is sufficient to give each nickel atom the favored 18-electron configuration in a structure with an Ni–Ni single bond. Structure 0N–Ni–6T, lying 17.5 kcal mol−1 above 0N–Ni–1S in energy, is a triplet version of the singlet structure 0N–Ni–3S with fundamentally the same geometry. The Ni–Ni distance of 2.547 Å in the triplet 0N–Ni–6T is significantly longer than the Ni–Ni distance of 2.402 Å in the singlet 0N–Ni–3S.
The potential energy surface becomes much more complicated for the cobalt system Cp2Co2C2Me2 with nine structures lying within 10 kcal mol−1 of the lowest energy structure (Fig. 13). The unchanged dimethylacetylene ligand without any hydrogen migration is found in the triplet structure 0N–Co–2T of relatively high C2v symmetry lying only 1.6 kcal mol−1 below the global minimum as well in the higher energy singlet structure 0N–Co–6S. Structures having central cobaltallylic units in various geometries and spin states are most prevalent being found in the lowest energy Cp2Co2C2Me2 structure 0N–Co–1T as well as the triplet structure 0N–Co–3T and the singlet structures 0N–Co–7S and 0N–Co–9S. The singlet structure 0N–Co–4S and the triplet structure 0N–Co–5T both have bridging butadiene ligands with one agostic C–H–Co interaction. A bridging methylallene ligand is found in structure 0N–Co–8T.
The potential energy surface for the iron system Cp2Fe2C2Me2 is nearly as complicated as that of the corresponding cobalt system with ten structures lying within 22 kcal mol−1 of the lowest energy structure (Fig. 14). The lowest energy Cp2Fe2C2Me2 structure is the singlet structure 0N–Fe–1S with two bridging three-electron donor methylcarbyne groups arising from dichotomy of the CC triple bond in dimethylacetylene. Structure 0N–Fe–1S appears to be a particularly favorable structure since it lies more than 9 kcal mol−1 in energy below the next lowest energy structure. Interpreting the Fe
Fe distance of 2.318 Å in 0N–Fe–1S as a formal double bond gives each iron atom the favored 18-electron configuration. The corresponding triplet alkyne dichotomy structure 0N–Fe–5T with essentially the same Fe
Fe distance of 2.353 Å lies 12.8 kcal mol−1 above 0N–Fe–1S. In 0N–Fe–5T the triplet spin state arises from an Fe
Fe double bond of the σ + 2/2π type similar to that in dioxygen as well as the triplet spin state organometallic derivative (η5-Me5C5)2Fe2(μ-CO)3, that has been structurally characterized by X-ray crystallography.35 The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) was predicted to be 0.079 Å between the singlet 0N–Fe–1S and the triplet 0N–Fe–5T.
The second lowest energy Cp2Fe2C2Me2 structure, namely the triplet 0N–Fe–2T lying 10.6 kcal mol−1 above 0N–Fe–1S, has an intact dimethylacetylene ligand. Interpreting the FeFe distance (WBI = 1.24 in Table 1) of 2.150 Å as a triple σ + π + δ type bond gives each iron atom a 18-electron configuration for a binuclear triplet.
Structure | Ni–Ni (Å) | WBI | MBI | Bond order |
---|---|---|---|---|
2N–Ni–1S | 2.310 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1 |
2N–Ni–2T | 2.359 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 1 |
2N–Ni–3S | 3.496 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0 |
2N–Ni–4S | 2.790 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0 |
2N–Co–1S | 2.360 | 0.71 | 0.54 | 1 |
2N–Co–2T | 2.314 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 2 |
2N–Co–3S | 2.236 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 2 |
2N–Co–4S | 2.624 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 1 |
2N–Co–5T | 2.556 | 0.63 | 0.42 | 1 |
2N–Fe–1S | 2.344 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 2 |
2N–Fe–2T | 2.360 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 2 |
2N–Fe–3S | 2.278 | 1.14 | 1.21 | 3 |
2N–Fe–4T | 2.555 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 1 |
2N–Fe–5S | 2.468 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 2 |
1N–Ni–1S | 2.300 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1 |
1N–Ni–2S | 2.379 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 1 |
1N–Ni–3T | 2.531 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 1 |
1N–Ni–4S | 2.903 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0 |
1N–Co–1S | 2.436 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 1 |
1N–Co–2T | 2.356 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 1 |
1N–Co–3T | 2.714 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 1 |
1N–Co–4T | 2.302 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 1 |
1N–Fe–1T | 2.370 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 2 |
1N–Fe–2S | 2.345 | 0.81 | 0.68 | 2 |
1N–Fe–3T | 2.345 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 2 |
1N–Fe–4T | 2.381 | 0.79 | 0.61 | 2 |
0N–Ni–1S | 2.294 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1 |
0N–Ni–2T | 2.285 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 1 |
0N–Ni–3S | 2.400 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 1 |
0N–Ni–4S | 2.432 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 1 |
0N–Ni–5S | 2.342 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 1 |
0N–Ni–6T | 2.545 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 1 |
0N–Co–1T | 2.417 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 1 |
0N–Co–2T | 2.312 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 2 |
0N–Co–3T | 2.404 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 1 |
0N–Co–4S | 2.416 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 1 |
0N–Co–5T | 2.524 | 0.51 | 0.37 | 1 |
0N–Co–6S | 2.159 | 1.05 | 1.12 | 2 |
0N–Co–7S | 2.432 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 1 |
0N–Co–8T | 2.454 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 1 |
0N–Co–9S | 2.291 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 2 |
0N–Fe–1S | 2.326 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 2 |
0N–Fe–2T | 2.150 | 1.24 | 1.38 | 3 |
0N–Fe–3T | 2.542 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 2 |
0N–Fe–4T | 2.450 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 2 |
0N–Fe–5T | 2.338 | 0.80 | 0.56 | 2 |
0N–Fe–6T | 2.330 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 2 |
0N–Fe–7S | 2.280 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 2 |
0N–Fe–8S | 2.437 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 2 |
0N–Fe–9T | 2.398 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 1 |
0N–Fe–10T | 2.490 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 1 |
The remaining low-energy Cp2Fe2C2Me2 structure, namely the triplet 0N–Fe–9T lying 16.6 kcal mol−1 above 0N–Fe–1S, is the only Cp2M2(alkyne) isomer found in this work in which a cyclopentadienyl ring has migrated from one iron atom to the other (Fig. 14). This Cp migration results in one iron atom approaching a ferrocene-like environment by being bonded to a quasiterminal pentahapto η5-Cp ligand and to four carbon atoms of a bridging η4,η1-Cp ligand. This sandwich-type ligand arrangement coupled with an FeFe double bond of length 2.399 Å gives this central iron atom the favored 18-electron configuration provided that it bears a formal positive charge. The other iron atom in 0N–Fe–9T, which is bonded to one carbon atom of the bridging η4,η1-Cp ligand, has a C–H–Fe agostic interaction with a C–H unit of the quasiterminal Cp ring, and bears an intact terminal MeC
CMe ligand functioning as a four-electron donor through both π systems. This set of ligands combined with the Fe
Fe double bond gives this iron atom a 16-electron configuration provided that it bears a formal negative charge to balance the formal positive charge on the other iron atom. The 16-electron configuration of the iron bearing the alkyne ligand can account for the triplet spin state of 0N–Fe–9T.
Taking the singlet Cp2Fe2C2(NMe2)2 structures as examples, the Bond Critical Points (BCPs), Ring Critical Points (RCPs), and Cage Critical Points (CCPs) have been plotted by using the MultiWFN software (Fig. 15). However, no obvious BCPs between the two iron atoms or between the nitrogen atom and the iron atom were observed. This suggests that there is no pure metal–metal bonding or nitrogen–metal bonding. Instead, multicenter bond characters (RCP and CCP) are displayed in these structures. However, use of the formal metal–metal bond orders suggested by the WBI data (Table 1) leads to reasonable electron bookkeeping for these molecules.
![]() | ||
Fig. 16 Proposed hydrogen migration path for the Cp2Co2(MeC2NMe2) system predicted by the M06-L/def2-TZVP method. |
The Cp2M2(alkyne) systems based on the alkynes MeCCNMe2 and MeC
CMe, have methyl groups directly linked to alkyne carbon atoms. This makes their hydrogen atoms more accessible for migration to alkyne carbon atoms than the more remotely located methyl hydrogen atoms on the amino nitrogen atoms in the Cp2M2(Me2NC
CNMe2) systems. Therefore, the potential energy surfaces of the MeC
CNMe2 and MeC
CMe systems are complicated. However, for the nickel systems Cp2Ni2(MeC2NMe2) and Cp2Ni2C2Me2 with enough d electrons from the nickel atoms, it is not necessary to completely cleave the C
C bond for the nickel atoms to have the favored 18-electron configuration. Therefore the tetrahedrane complexes with intact alkyne ligands remain the lowest energy structures again corresponding to several experimentally known Cp2Ni2(alkyne) complexes.15,16 However, for the cobalt and iron systems derived from the MeC
CNMe2 ligand, the singlet and triplet metalallylic structures Cp2M2(CHCHCHNMe2) arising from migration of two methyl hydrogen atoms, one to each alkyne carbon atom, are the lowest energy structures. This situation is similar to that in the experimentally known manganese carbonyl complexes (Et2NC2Me)Mn2(CO)8 of alkynes with methyl substituents where hydrogen migration from the methyl group to one or both alkyne carbon atoms is observed to give species with bridging allene or manganallyl units (Fig. 2).19 For the cobalt system derived from dimethylacetylene, the Cp2Co2(CH2CHCMe) vinylcarbene structure with migration of one methyl hydrogen atom to the adjacent alkyne carbon atom is the lowest energy structure. For the iron system derived from dimethylacetylene, the alkyne dichotomy Cp2Fe2(CMe)2 structure is the lowest energy structure.
The sets of low-energy Cp2M2(MeC2NMe2) and Cp2M2C2Me2 isomers formed by hydrogen migration processes also include structures with bridging allene ligands and with bridging vinylcarbene ligands formed by migration of a single methyl hydrogen to the remote alkyne carbon atom (the γ-carbon atom) and to the adjacent alkyne carbon atom (the β-carbon atom), respectively. In addition, the set of low-energy structures for the Cp2M2C2Me2 (M = Co, Fe) systems derived from dimethylacetylene includes derivatives with bridging butadiene ligands formed by migration of one hydrogen atom from each methyl group to an alkyne carbon atom.
Five transition states have been identified in a possible mechanistic sequence for double hydrogen migration in the Cp2Co2/MeCCNMe2 system to give the cobaltallylic complex Cp2Co2(C3H3NMe2) found to be the lowest energy structure of Cp2Co2(MeC2NMe2) stoichiometry. This mechanistic sequence has intermediates with C–H–Co interactions through agostic hydrogen atoms and successive activation energy barriers of 13.1, 17.0, 15.2, and 12.0 kcal mol−1.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Tables S1 to S11: Atomic coordinates of the optimized structures for the cmp-n (n = 1 to 6) and TS-n (n = 1 to 5) complexes in Fig. 15; Tables S12 to S22: harmonic vibrational frequencies (in cm−1) and infrared intensities (in parentheses in km mol−1) for the cmp-n (n = 1–6) and TS-n (n = 1–5) complexes in Fig. 15; Tables S23: the optimized structures of the cmp-n (n = 1–6) and TS-n (n = 1–5) complexes in Fig. 15; Tables S24 to S26: the optimized structures of the Cp2Ni2C2(NMe2)2, Cp2Co2C2(NMe2)2 and Cp2Fe2C2(NMe2)2 complexes; Tables S27 to S29: the optimized structures of the Cp2Ni2(MeC2NMe2), Cp2Co2(MeC2NMe2) and Cp2Fe2(MeC2NMe2) complexes; Tables S30 to S32: The optimized structures of the Cp2Ni2C2Me2, Cp2Co2C2Me2 and Cp2Fe2C2Me2 complexes. Separate .xyz file of the optimized structures. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra01410c |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |