Naoki
Mori
,
Toshiki
Tachibana
,
Nariyoshi
Umekubo
and
Yujiro
Hayashi
*
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan. E-mail: yujiro.hayashi.b7@tohoku.ac.jp
First published on 12th March 2024
Highly substituted trans-hydrindanes were synthesized by the three-component coupling reactions of 1,3-diethyl 2-(2-oxopropylidene)propanedioate and two different α,β-unsaturated aldehydes catalyzed by diphenylprolinol silyl ether. The reaction proceeds via two successive independent catalytic domino reactions in a one-pot reaction by a single chiral catalyst. Domino reactions involve Michael/Michael and Michael/aldol reactions to afford trans-hydrindanes with excellent diastereoselectivity and nearly optically pure form.
![]() | ||
Scheme 2 The schematic representation of domino reaction and one-pot reaction. A, B, C = reagents. I = intermediate. P = product. |
One-pot reactions have also been shown to be efficient methods for synthesizing complex molecules, in which the construction of multiple bonds in a single reaction vessel is necessary. For a one-pot reaction, consecutive reactions are performed, in which reagents are added sequentially.5 Our group has an interest in organocatalyst mediated one-pot reactions using a single chiral catalyst, and have previously accomplished several total syntheses of biologically active molecules in a pot-economic manner.6 A representative example from our group is the first pot reaction of the two pot synthesis of (−)-oseltamivir (eqn (2)).6b In this synthesis, the first reaction is an organocatalyst mediated asymmetric Michael reaction. The subsequent reactions, however, are non-catalytic, and the observed stereochemistry is achieved via substrate control. This is represented schematically in eqn (5).
On the other hand, one-pot reactions, in which a single chiral catalyst can catalyze two independent catalytic cycles by sequential addition of reagents, are also useful reactions to control the absolute configuration of several stereogenic centers using a single chiral catalyst. A successful example of this is MacMillan's one-pot reaction with control over the two stereocenters (eqn (3)),7 its schematic representation is shown in eqn (6). In this reaction, catalyst control must outweigh substrate control in the second reaction. Thus, this is a difficult reaction with few successful examples. Moreover, MacMillan's reaction is a formal addition reaction of HCl. As far as we are aware, there are no examples of this type of reaction (eqn (6)), involving two C–C-bond forming catalytic cycles. In this paper, we will report the first asymmetric one-pot reaction via sequential addition of reagents, which involves two independent C–C– bond forming catalytic cycles, both catalyzed by the same chiral catalyst.
Bicyclo[4.3.0]nonane skeletons are known as hydrindanes,8 and there are several natural products possessing trans-hydrindane skeletons such as isopulo'upone,9 tamariscol,10 and haliclonadiamine11 (Fig. 1). There are a few methods for the synthesis of this skeleton using asymmetric catalytic reactions. An intramolecular Diels–Alder reaction of 2,7,9-decatrienoic acid derivatives or 2,7,9-decatrienals was utilized for the construction of trans-hydrindanes, which was catalyzed by chiral Lewis acids such as titanium, boron and copper with excellent diastereo- and enantio-selectivity (Scheme 3, eqn (7) and (8)).12 Desymmetrization by asymmetric copper-catalyzed intramolecular C–H insertion afforded trans-hydrindanes with moderate selectivity (eqn (9)).13
Additionally, rapid developments in the organocatalytic field have enabled the formation of trans-hydrindanes using organocatalysts. Organocatalyst mediated intramolecular or an intermolecular Michael reaction, followed by an intramolecular aldol reaction afforded the trans-hydrindanes with excellent selectivity (eqn (10) and (11)).14 Although there are excellent catalytic methods for the synthesis of this skeleton, it remains a challenge to efficiently synthesize a scaffold possessing several substituents with excellent optical purity, whilst minimizing the number of pots.
Our group15 and Jørgensen's group16 developed diphenylprolinol silyl ether I (Fig. 2),17 independently in 2005. We reported that this amine catalyzes the Michael reaction of ketones and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes,18 which was then used in the asymmetric synthesis of cyclopentanone derivatives (eqn (12))6g and one-pot synthesis of cis-hydrindanes via Michael/Michael/aldol condensation reaction (eqn (13)).19
Our continuous interest in the synthesis of hydrindanes lead us to develop a one-pot synthesis of highly substituted trans-hydrindanes with high diastereo- and enantioselectivities via two independent catalytic cycles catalyzed by the same chiral organocatalyst.
We investigated the first reaction of 1 and 2a for the synthesis of 3a using an equal amount of each reagent alongside catalyst I (Table 1). For future application to a one-pot operation, it is not possible to use an excess of reagent 1 to help prevent the three-component self-coupling reaction that forms 4aa. Although i-PrOH was the best solvent in the previous reaction of ethyl 4-oxo-2-pentenoate (eqn (12)), the present reaction afforded the product 3a in a low yield (entry 1). As 1 has a highly activated double bond with three electron withdrawing groups, it is a reactive Michael acceptor and trimethylsilyl ether catalyst I might react with 1 as a Michael donor. In order to prevent this possible side reaction, we used a more sterically hindered diphenylmethylsilyl ether II as a catalyst which resulted in a higher yield (entry 2). Next, different solvents were investigated such as i-PrOH, CH3CN, CH2Cl2, THF and toluene (entries 2–6). Toluene was found to be a suitable solvent, affording 3a in 65% yield and the over-reaction product 4aa in 9% yield. The generation of 4aa was completely suppressed when the reaction was conducted at lower temperature (0 °C), providing the desired product 3a in good yield (75%, entry 7). It was also found that 3a was obtained in a nearly optical pure form. The yield of 3a slightly decreased in the absence of water (entry 8).
Entry | Catalyst | Solvent | Time [h] | Yield of 3a [%] | Yield of 4aa [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Unless otherwise shown, the reaction was performed by employing 1 (0.5 mmol), 2a (0.5 mmol), organocatalyst (0.1 mmol), p-nitrophenol (0.5 mmol), water (1.5 mmol), in solvent (1.0 mL) at room temperature. b 1 (2.3 mmol), 2a (2.3 mmol), organocatalyst (0.47 mmol), p-nitrophenol (2.3 mmol), water (7.0 mmol), and solvent (4.7 mL) were employed. c Reaction was carried out at 0 °C. d Enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined to be >99% by HPLC analysis on a chiral column material. e The reaction was carried out in the absence of water. | |||||
1 | I | iPrOH | 6 | 32 | 18 |
2 | II | iPrOH | 6 | 53 | 22 |
3 | II | CH3CN | 14 | 42 | 16 |
4 | II | CH2Cl2 | 20 | 49 | 20 |
5 | II | THF | 20 | 46 | 19 |
6 | II | Toluene | 6 | 65 | 9 |
7b | II | Toluenec | 24 | 75d | Trace |
8 | II | Toluenec,e | 24 | 70 | Trace |
Once a good result was obtained in the first reaction, the second reaction was investigated using the isolated 3a and 3-(p-methoxyphenyl)prop-2-enal (2b). Malonate is known to be a good Michael donor in the reaction of α,β-unsaturated aldehyde catalyzed by diarylprolinol silyl ether, but the best reaction conditions vary depending on the paper. While Jørgensen reported the Michael reaction of malonates and α,β-unsaturated aldehyde catalyzed by diarylprolinol silyl ether with trifluoromethyl substituents (eqn (16)),22 Ye and coworkers reported that the same reaction was catalyzed by a combination of diphenylprolinol silyl ether with lithium 4-fluorobenzoate (eqn (17)).23
For a one-pot reaction, it is desirable if both the first and second reaction can be catalyzed by the same catalyst. Thus, the reaction was examined with catalyst II. After the optimization of the reaction conditions, (see Table S1†) p-nitrophenol and t-BuOH24 were found to be the best additive and the solvent, respectively (eqn (18)). It should be noted that the reaction conditions are rather different from those previously reported (eqn (16) and (17)).
Both the first reaction and the second reaction were optimized. In the first reaction, we used 1 and 2 as a 1:
1 ratio, and we can combine these two reactions in one-pot to afford the trans-hydrindane 4ab with excellent enantioselectivity (eqn (19)).
After this one-pot synthesis of 4ab was established, the generality of the reaction was investigated (Table 2). First, we examined the effect of β-aryl group (R1) of the α,β-unsaturated aldehyde 2 in the first reaction, in which cinnamaldehyde (2a, R2 = Ph) was employed as a second α,β-unsaturated aldehyde 2′. Not only electron rich p-methoxyphenyl but also electron deficient p-chloro-, p-bromo, and p-trifluoromethyl phenyl substituents are suitable to afford the trans-hydrindanes 4 in a nearly optically pure form. The (E)-4-methoxystyryl substituent also gave product 4 even though the yield was low. (E)-5-Phenylpent-2-enal, (E)-5-(trimethylsilyl)pent-2-en-4-ynal and 2-propenal were found to not be suitable for this reaction (see the ESI†).
a Unless otherwise shown, the first reaction was performed by employing 1 (0.5 mmol), 2 (0.5 mmol), organocatalyst (0.1 mmol), p-nitrophenol (0.5 mmol), water (1.5 mmol), in toluene (1.0 mL), and the second reaction was performed by employing 2′ (0.5 mmol), water (1.5 mmol), in t-BuOH (1.0 mL).
b Products 4 were obtained as a single diastereomer.
c Enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral column material.
d It took 5 d for the first reaction.
e
t-BuOH/toluene (1![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Next, we investigated the β-substituent (R2) of the α,β-unsaturated aldehyde 2′ in the second reaction, in which cinnamaldehyde (2a, R1 = Ph) was employed as a first α,β-unsaturated aldehyde 2. For the β-aryl substituent of the α,β-unsaturated aldehyde, not only electron rich p-methoxyphenyl group but also electron withdrawing p-fluorophenyl, p-chlorophenyl, p-trifluoromethylphenyl, p-bromophenyl, m-bromophenyl, o-bromophenyl and p-nitrophenyl are suitable substituents to afford the trans-hydrindanes with excellent enantioselectivity. Neutral aryl groups such as a phenyl group and heteroaryl groups such as a 2-furyl group can also be employed successfully. On the other hand, (E)-5-phenylpent-2-enal, (2E,4E)-5-phenylpenta-2,4-dienal, (E)-5-(trimethylsilyl)pent-2-en-4-ynal and 2-propenal resulted in no reaction or the formation of a complex mixture (see the ESI†).
It should be noted that the reaction is highly diastereoselective and enantioselective. In all cases examined, the product 425 was obtained with excellent diastereoselectivity and nearly optically pure form.
The absolute configuration of the first domino reaction product 3a was determined by comparison of the optical rotation with known compound 6,6g which was synthesized as shown in eqn (21): 3a was treated with Ph3PCHCO2Et to afford 5 in good yield, and the reaction of 5 with LiCl afforded diester 6.
The reaction proceeds as follows (Scheme 4): in the first domino reaction of 1 and α,β-unsaturated aldehyde, catalyst II reacts with α,β-unsaturated aldehyde to generate an iminium ion, which reacts with 1 to generate an enamine and intramolecular Michael reaction proceeds to afford 3. In the second domino reaction, catalyst II reacts with another α,β-unsaturated aldehyde to generate an iminium ion, which reacts with 3via Michael reaction to afford an enamine. Intramolecular aldol reaction successively proceeds to afford the trans-hydrindane.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4sc00193a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |