Victor Sunday Aigbodionabc and
Ekele Dinneya-Onuoha
*cd
aFaculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, P. O. Box 534, Auckland Park, South Africa
bDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka Postal Code 410001, Nigeria
cAfrica Centre of Excellence, ACESPED University of Nigeria, Nsukka Postal Code 410001, Nigeria
dDepartment of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka Postal Code 410001, Nigeria. E-mail: ekele.onuoha@unn.edu.ng
First published on 5th August 2024
This study investigates the development and efficacy of Zn-eggshell particle (ESAp) coatings on mild steel, utilizing starch extract as a modifier to enhance anti-corrosion properties. Coatings with varying ESAp content (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8%) and a fixed addition of 2% starch were successfully applied via electrodeposition. The findings reveal that increasing the ESAp content results in thicker coatings, with the Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch coating exhibiting the greatest thickness. SEM analysis confirmed the high quality of the coatings, showing no external surface defects. The Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch-coated sample demonstrated a 46.45% increase in hardness (100.3 HB) and achieved superior corrosion protection efficiencies of 82.92% and 94.69% for Zn-8% ESAp and Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch coatings, respectively. Electrochemical tests indicated that the coated samples shifted towards higher positive potential values, suggesting enhanced corrosion resistance. The results underscore the potential of using starch extract and waste eggshells to develop robust anti-corrosion coatings, with Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch identified as the optimal formulation for superior protection and mechanical properties. Further research is recommended to explore the matrix–particle interactions and adhesion properties using advanced microscopic and electrochemical techniques.
Zinc (Zn) and its derivatives are widely favored as protective coatings due to their excellent galvanic protection properties.13–16 Acting as sacrificial anodes, zinc corrodes preferentially to the underlying metal, forming a robust protective barrier.13,17,18 In steel construction, cathodic protection proves highly effective in preventing rust. Zinc coatings, similar to galvanization, have long been utilized for their cost-effectiveness, ease of application, and reliable performance across diverse conditions.14 Despite their extensive use, potential enhancements through modifications and composite formulations offer significant promise for boosting effectiveness. While traditional zinc coatings perform adequately, they remain susceptible to environmental degradation, especially in harsh conditions characterized by high humidity, salt, and industrial contaminants.19 Achieving greater mechanical strength, longevity, and corrosion resistance in these coatings necessitates the adoption of novel materials and hybrid manufacturing techniques.
Research now focuses on developing composite coatings, which combine zinc with other materials to provide protective layers with many uses.20,21 Natural materials have garnered a lot of attention lately for use in engineering applications. This paradigm shift was prompted by the demand for long-term, ecologically conscious solutions that minimize environmental effects while preserving or enhancing material performance.20 Eggshell particles, a byproduct of the food industry, have emerged as a viable replacement for such uses.22–24 Calcium carbonate (CaCO3), the main component of eggshells, has natural qualities that can improve the mechanical strength and corrosion resistance of composite coatings.23 Using eggshell particles in zinc coatings has several advantages. First, by sealing up micro-pores and other imperfections in the zinc matrix, calcium carbonate can act as a physical barrier to lessen the entry of corrosive substances.25 CaCO3 can also engage in chemical reactions that enhance the coating's protective properties.26 For example, when moisture and CO2 are present, calcium carbonate may transform into calcium bicarbonate, as shown by eqn (1).
CaCO3 + CO2 + H2O → Ca(HCO3)2 | (1) |
This reaction raises the overall density of the coating and helps close micro-cracks. Moreover, acidic environments, which often intensify corrosion processes, can be countered by the alkaline properties of CaCO3.27 The neutralization process described in eqn (2) may take place when the coating is exposed to acidic conditions:
CaCO3 + 2HCl → CaCl2 + CO2 + H2O | (2) |
This neutralization can stop corrosion to the underlying metal by balancing the pH at the metal-coating contact.27 To help create a more adherent and compact layer, eggshell particles are added to the mixture, increasing the layer's mechanical integrity and resistance to degradation. Aigbodion and Akinlabi28 found that the zinc-eggshell particles composite coating on mild steel demonstrated better corrosion resistance and thermal stability than traditional zinc coatings. At a certain concentration of eggshell powder, the composite coating showed a notable improvement in corrosion resistance, achieving a maximum corrosion protection efficacy of 82.3%. Furthermore, microstructural alterations were discovered and the thermal properties of the composite coating were enhanced, both of which may result in increased adhesion and protective characteristics.
Eggshell particles are an excellent addition to zinc-based anti-corrosion coatings, however dispersion, adhesion, and homogeneity are still intrinsic issues with composite coatings. Recent research has examined several novel approaches to address the issues of dispersion, adhesion, and uniformity in composite coatings. By enhancing adhesion and dispersion, coupling agents and silanization—two sophisticated surface modification techniques—have increased the interfacial interaction between particles and the matrix.29,30 Particle dispersion within the composite matrix has been shown to be enhanced by the inclusion of surfactants and dispersants, such as naturally occurring polymers like chitosan and gelatin.31,32 Furthermore, the use of nanoparticles like graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes in the development of nanocomposite coatings has shown enhanced mechanical characteristics and homogeneity because of their strong interfacial contacts and high aspect ratios.33–35 Additionally, it has been shown that during the production of composite coatings, high-shear mixing and ultrasonic agitation may be used to break up particle agglomerates and provide a more uniform distribution.32,36 Furthermore, improvements to electrophoretic deposition protocols have allowed composite materials to be deposited more precisely and evenly, resulting in coatings with improved structural integrity and performance.37–39 However these technologies also frequently entail difficult, expensive, and time-consuming procedures.40 They could also need significant energy inputs or introduce potentially hazardous substances, which would make them less environmentally friendly and inappropriate for large-scale applications. On the other hand, starch offers a more straightforward, economical, and ecological alternative as it is a readily available, biodegradable, and non-toxic substance.
When starch was added to the electrolyte system, a denser and thicker oxide layer formed on the alloy surface compared to the electrolyte without starch, according to Kaseem and Ko's41 analysis of the impact of starch on the corrosion behavior of Al–Mg–Si alloy processed via micro-arc oxidation (MAO). The alloy's resistance to corrosion in chloride conditions was enhanced by the denser oxide layer, which had a lower porosity and included both the γ-Al2O3 and α-Al2O3 phases. Compared to the alloy made without starch, the use of starch improved the structural qualities of the protective layer and enhanced its corrosion resistance. The study highlighted the possibility of using starch as an affordable and environmentally friendly additive to increase the corrosion resistance of MAO's Al–Mg–Si alloy coatings.
Akinfenwa et al.42 claim that adding starch to Zn–TiO2 coatings significantly improves their anti-corrosion properties. Compared to the unmodified Zn–TiO2 coating, which corrodes at a rate of 6.7197 × 10−4 mm year−1, the study discovered that Zn–TiO2-starch coatings had significantly reduced corrosion rates, ranging from 4.1902 × 10−4 to 2.418 × 10−4 mm year−1. The increased starch concentrations in the coating were thought to be responsible for its improved corrosion resistance due to improved starch granule dispersion as seen by SEM/EDS imaging and the creation of stable crystallite phases in XRD patterns. The starch-modified coatings provide a more homogeneous, hydrophobic barrier, which increases the coating's resilience to corrosive conditions.
The purpose of this study is to utilize electrodeposition to produce and evaluate a novel anti-corrosion coating incorporating zinc and starch-modified eggshell particles. Electrodeposition is a versatile and commonly employed process for depositing metallic coatings, offering precise control over coating microstructure, thickness, and composition.43 This method is useful when metal matrices and particle reinforcements are co-deposited since it makes it possible to create composite coatings with specific characteristics.44 The major goals are to examine the combined impact of these materials on the microstructural characteristics, mechanical capabilities, and corrosion resistance of the resulting coatings. This research aims to advance corrosion prevention through high-performance, environmentally friendly composite coatings. It leverages the inherent properties of eggshell particles and the binding capabilities of starch. This finding is significant as it offers a sustainable alternative to conventional anti-corrosion coatings, thereby supporting global initiatives in materials engineering. The study's findings might lead to the development of novel coating formulae that combine the benefits of natural and engineered materials, producing corrosion prevention solutions that are more durable and eco-friendly.
Elements | C | Mn | Si | P | S | Zn | Al | Ni | Fe |
% | 0.16 | 0.35 | 0.15 | 0.0031 | 0.021 | 0.034 | 0.005 | 0.075 | Balance |
To get rid of any impurities and oxides on the surface, the mild steel was first immersed in a 10% HCl solution for ten minutes. Following the acid treatment, metallographic grit sheets and alumina paste were used to polish and grind the steel to produce a uniformly smooth surface. After rinsing the prepared steel samples in deionized water to remove any last bits of abrasive material, they were dried completely. To prepare the mild steel samples for coating application, they were finally chopped into 5 cm by 4 cm pieces.
The VeecoDektak 150 Profilometer was used to measure the surface roughness of the coatings. This gadget captures and amplifies the vertical displacements of a stylus moving at a constant rate across the sample surface to find surface irregularities. For this experiment, a stylus with a tip radius of 12.5 μm was employed, scanning at a speed of 26.7 μm s−1 with a force of 5 N. This method produced detailed surface topography data for the coatings.
To gather comprehensive details on the materials' chemical makeup and crystalline structure, X-ray diffraction (XRD) was utilized. CuKα radiation (α = 1.5418 Å) at 34 kV and 25 mA was used to study the XRD patterns. An “X-PertProPANalytical, LR 39487C XRD diffractometer” was used for the experiments. With step measurements made every 0.04° for 6 seconds per step, the diffraction data were acquired in a 2θ angular range spanning from 10 to 90°, yielding accurate and thorough crystallographic data.
TESCAN SEM was used to analyze the coated specimens' surface morphology (SEM). The specimens were carefully cleaned with acetone before imaging to guarantee a good view of the surface characteristics and eliminate any impurities. This cleaning process was necessary to avoid interference from residual particles that may obscure the coatings' true shape. The SEM analysis yielded high-resolution images of the specimens that allowed for a detailed inspection of the coating uniformity, surface structure, and any potential microstructural features. This inspection was necessary to assess the integrity and quality of the coatings and to comprehend their physical properties. The SEM images provided information on the distribution and microscopic interactions of the coating materials in addition to making it feasible to identify any faults, such as holes or cracks.
A portable Rockwell hardness tester was used to measure the hardness values of the coated specimens, strictly according to the ASTM E-384 hardness test methodology. A measurable indicator of the coating's resistance to deformation is provided by this established method, which guarantees accurate and consistent readings. An indenter was used in the test, and it was loaded to a certain point until it pierced the specimen's surface. The hardness value was obtained by measuring the indentation depth exactly. To ensure accuracy and reproducibility, this procedure was carried out repeatedly on each sample at various times in order to get the average hardness value.
The electrochemical tester, type CHI604E, was used to test for corrosion. The process guaranteed methodological precision and consistency by adhering to the ASTM G19 Standard. The reference electrode in the electrochemical setup was an Ag/AgCl electrode, the counter electrode was a graphite rod, and the working electrode was the coated samples. A 3.5% NaCl solution was utilized to replicate an environment that is corrosive, similar to seawater. In complete compliance with ISO 9227:2017 guidelines, the test settings comprised a potential range of 0.5 to −0.5 V, a temperature of 30 °C, a scanning rate of 0.5 mV s−1, and a relative humidity (RH) of 100%. These circumstances guaranteed a regulated and repeatable setting for assessing corrosion behavior. Using the linear polarization eqn (1), the polarization resistance (RP) of the samples was determined, offering important information about the coatings' ability to protect. A thorough evaluation of the coated specimens' corrosion resistance and electrochemical stability was made possible by this extensive testing regimen.
![]() | (3) |
1st reading | 2nd reading | 3rd reading | Average reading μm | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Zn-ESAp | ||||
0% ESAp | 91 | 92 | 99 | 94 |
2% ESAp | 98 | 99 | 100 | 99 |
4% ESAp | 104 | 105 | 104 | 103.3 |
6% ESAp | 125 | 130 | 128 | 127.7 |
8% ESAp | 124 | 130 | 130 | 128 |
![]() |
||||
Zn-ESAp + 2% Starch | ||||
0% ESAp | 94 | 95 | 99 | 96 |
2% ESAp | 99 | 99 | 100 | 99.3 |
4% ESAp | 106 | 107 | 104 | 105.67 |
6% ESAp | 130 | 130 | 128 | 129.3 |
8% ESAp | 135 | 130 | 130 | 131.6 |
The samples with starch added had thicker coats than the ones without, per the results. Moreover, a rise in coating thickness was proportionate to an increase in the formulation's ESAp content. The sample containing 0% ESAp had the thinnest coating due to the absence of both starch and ESAp, highlighting the crucial role that both additives play in facilitating coating deposition. Interestingly, the Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch coating exhibited the thickest layer of all the samples. This implies that starch and ESAp work in concert to promote a coating layer that is thicker and maybe more protective. Starch increased the viscosity of the electrodeposition solution, which resulted in a more uniform and dense deposition of zinc on the substrate, while ESAp, which is mostly made of calcium carbonate, served as nucleation sites for zinc deposition, encouraging a thicker coating. Since the deposition rate slowed down and became more regulated, the thicker coating was probably the result of the lower mobility of zinc ions caused by the greater viscosity.
Moreover, large diffraction peaks at 2θ = 40° and 51° were visible in the coated samples' XRD patterns, indicating the existence of the CaO and CaSiO3 (100, 104) phases, respectively. These stages imply that the eggshell particles (ESAp) have a major impact on the system's crystalline behavior. These peaks' existence suggests that ESAp efficiently alters mild steel's surface, encouraging the phases of calcium oxide and calcium silicate to develop within the coating. To improve the coating's mechanical and chemical qualities and increase its overall performance and longevity, this surface modification is essential.
In addition, Fig. 3 demonstrates that the coated sample containing 2% starch and 8% ESAp had more diffraction peaks and a lower interspacing distance than the 8% ESAp sample that was left untreated. This discovery implies that a more refined and densely packed crystalline structure results from the addition of starch to the ESAp composite. The interfacial interactions made possible by the inclusion of ESAp in the coating mixture lead to the creation of the CaSiO3 phase in the composite coating. A composite material with improved structural integrity and corrosion resistance is produced as a result of these interactions, which facilitate the integration of silicon and calcium from the ESAp into the zinc matrix. The results are consistent with research by Aigbodion et al.,48 which found that adding ESAp improved coating characteristics in a comparable way. The improved phase formation and crystalline structure support the coating's overall efficacy in shielding the mild steel substrate from corrosive conditions.
The gritty appearance observed during electrodeposition was due to the uniform dispersion of ESAp in the solution. SEM images of the coated samples did not show any external surface defects such as faults, damage, or contours. The characteristics of mild steel are significantly influenced by the surface layers of the coating. The addition of conductive elements such as starch and boric acid is thought to promote adhesion. The Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch film has superior barrier qualities because it is denser and more compact than the Zn-8% ESAp films, according to SEM examination. These discoveries are in line with the findings of Akpan et al.,49 who found that a fine-grained, homogeneous, and compact microstructure was produced when the Zn–Ni–Al2O3 composite was deposited on mild steel.
The composite coating's EDS analysis, shown in Fig. 4–7, adds more credence to these findings. The mild steel substrate's EDS revealed a prominent Fe peak as expected (Fig. 4). However, the coated samples' EDS revealed significant peaks for zinc and calcium, indicating that the coating included these elements from the ESAp (Fig. 5–7). These results confirm the successful integration of ESAp into the coating and show better compositional characteristics of the coated samples, which is in line with the work done by Tuaweri et al.50
However, the barrier effect of Zn and ESAp is responsible for the OCP for the coated samples with starch that retain higher noble potential values than those of Zn-8% ESAp and mild steel. Moreover, Zn and Ca transform into Zn2+ and Ca2+, which function as cation ions, in coatings containing Zn and ESAp. The steel substrate's corrosion is halted by these cations. Particularly for Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch, it was seen that the OCP value shifted in the direction of a nobler value, suggesting improved protective qualities. With a higher positive corrosion potential (Ecorr) value than the as-received value, the coating was primarily protecting the cathodic area of the steel. Conversely, the Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch coatings frequently showed a mixed corrosion protection effect. The effect of the starch on the OCP of the steel coatings was further demonstrated by the fact that the OCP, which is a material's initial potential in a corrosive media, remained steady over the 3600 seconds immersion, suggesting that the stable state potential had been attained. However, the OCP of the other samples seemed to vary throughout the course of the 3600 seconds and stabilizations of time was obtained. This is consistent with what Fayomi et al.51 found.
Sample | Rate (mil per year) | Corrosion I (A) | Lin pol R (Ohms) |
---|---|---|---|
Mild steel | 4.971 × 102 | 2.105 × 10−2 | 10 |
0% ESAp | 1.035 × 102 | 1.297 × 10−3 | 31 |
2% ESAp | 9.248 × 101 | 9.079× 10−4 | 46 |
4% ESAp | 7.497 × 101 | 9.391× 10−4 | 42 |
6% ESAp | 6.091 × 101 | 7.629× 10−4 | 50 |
8% ESAp | 3.506 × 101 | 4.392× 10−4 | 99 |
The whole coated mild steel's corrosion potential (Ecorr) changed to a noble positive potential, and the coated mild steel electrode's corrosion resistance was significantly reduced. Additionally, the corrosion current (Icorr) was less than that of the electrode made of mild steel. It is commonly recognized that a positive shift in Ecorr and a decrease in Icorr are caused by the Zn layer coating the metal surface. The protection provided by composite coatings is impacted by both the barrier behavior and the passivation effect. According to corrosion kinetics, the rate of corrosion is determined by the corrosion current density; the potential decreases with increasing corrosion resistance. As the corrosion current density increases, so does the corrosion resistance. Consequently, the starch-coated sample exhibits superior resistance to corrosion. The mild steel sample that was obtained exhibited greater corrosion current density (jcorr), higher corrosion rate (CR), and lower polarization resistance (PR). When compared to the coated samples, these values showed that the as-received sample had the lowest resistance to the corrosive medium's degrading impact (3.65% NaCl). ESp coating significantly raised PR while lowering CR and jcorr.
This response showed that the coated sample was being kept free of chloride ions by the ESA particles. In contrast to the Zn-8% ESAp sample, the Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch coated sample had lower CR and jcorr values when it came to corrosion resistance performance (Table 4 and Fig. 11). At Zn-8% ESAp and Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch, corrosion protection efficiencies of 82.92 and 94.69% were attained. The addition of Zn–Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch enhanced the adhesive binding of the coating by reducing the amount of holes or pores that the corrosive medium may penetrate, as shown by the decreased corrosion resistance. Furthermore, it's likely that the 2% starch added to the Zn-% ESAp coating matrix inhibited the growth of the micro-voids in the ESA particles, shrank the diameters and boundaries of the grains, and hampered the production of new grains. Higher CR and jcorr values may have been the outcome, though, if the reduced quantity of ESA had reinforced big grain boundaries and created more gaps, apertures, or holes for the chloride ions to flow through. It is evident that the results obtained with the starch modifier show lower passivation current and oxide monomer current density than those obtained without it. This suggests that a less conductive composite coating with improved protective properties has been produced.
Sample | Rate (mil per year) | Corrosion I (A) | Lin pol R (Ohms) |
---|---|---|---|
Mild steel | 4.971 × 102 | 2.105 × 10−2 | 10 |
0% ESAp | 8.472 × 101 | 1.061 × 10−3 | 38 |
2% ESAp | 7.003 × 101 | 8.773 × 10−4 | 47 |
4% ESAp | 5.335 × 101 | 6.682 × 10−4 | 59 |
6% ESAp | 3.389 × 101 | 4.245 × 10−4 | 104 |
8% ESAp | 2.638 × 101 | 3.304 × 10−4 | 125 |
Zn–Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch has been discovered to have the greatest polarization resistance and lower corrosion current, indicating superior protective characteristics.52 Barrier effects and electrochemical protection are said to be the two most crucial elements in improving the corrosion-resistant properties of composite coatings. Put another way, the electrochemical protection justifies the formation of a passive layer on the metal surface and the increase in corrosion potential. Furthermore, since starch plays a useful function in dispersing Zn and ESAp to generate a thick and smooth coating surface, mild steel has been provided advantageous morphological qualities to protect it from corrosive environments by the Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch coating.
The sample containing starch exhibited a greater semicircle diameter compared to the one without starch. A larger semicircle diameter, or more pronounced persistence of charge transfer, is often indicative of higher corrosion resistance.50 The increase in charge transfer resistance is believed to result from the corrosion products formed on the sample surface, which reduce the corrosion rate.34,50 The Zn-8% ESAp/starch sample demonstrated the highest corrosion resistance, evidenced by the widest capacitive arc width. This enhancement is attributed to the formation of a barrier between the corrosive electrolyte and the sample surface, where the resulting oxide layer passively increases the material's resistance to corrosion.
The formation of an oxide layer is evident from the semicircle loop in the Nyquist plot, which suggests a strong protective effect of the passive layer. However, the presence of an inductance loop indicates potential delamination of the passive layer. Fig. 13 illustrates the impedance plots fitted with an equivalent circuit comprising solution resistance (Rs), charge transfer resistance (Rct), and double-layer capacitance (Cdl). To achieve a more accurate fit, the double-layer capacitance (Cdl) is replaced by a constant phase element (CPE), as the metal/solution interface does not behave as an ideal capacitor.
Table 5 summarizes the EIS parameters, including Rs, Rct, and Cdl. Typically, a decrease in Cdl values combined with an increase in Rct values signifies improved surface coverage and enhanced corrosion prevention. This is further supported by the Bode diagrams. The Bode modulus diagram shows an increase in impedance modulus across all frequencies, while the Bode phase angle diagram displays a more negative phase angle at high frequencies, indicating the beneficial effect of starch. The charge transfer resistance (Rct) is a crucial parameter for assessing the effectiveness of the passive layer. Higher Rct values denote greater resistance to ion movement within the passive layer, leading to better corrosion resistance. Fig. 12a shows that mild steel exhibits smaller semi-conductive loops compared to the coated samples, indicating that Zn-8% ESAp/starch coatings provide superior passive layer barrier efficiency.
Sample | Rs | Rct (Ω cm2) | Cpdl (μF cm−2) | CPE × 10−4 Ω−1 sn cm−2 | χ2 × 10−4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mild steel | 3.1 × 102 | 4.64 × 105 | 1.91 × 10−9 | 8.6 | 3.5 |
Zn-8% ESAp | 4.6 × 103 | 1.88 × 106 | 1.35 × 10−10 | 6.4 | 3.0 |
Zn-8% ESAp/starch | 1.47 × 104 | 2.35 × 106 | 6.79 × 10−11 | 4.3 | 2.0 |
The chi-square (χ2) values confirm the fitting accuracy of the equivalent circuit. Values of χ2 around 10−3 typically indicate a good fit,51 and the relatively low χ2 values (<10−3) for the proposed equivalent circuit in Table 5 suggest that the observed impedance spectra fit well with the suggested model.
Overall, the addition of starch enhances corrosion resistance, likely due to the electron-rich heteroatoms in starch, which facilitate the adsorption of ESAp on the metal surface during electrodeposition, thereby increasing the coating's surface coverage and improving its protective capabilities.45
The eroding surface of the coated material demonstrated that the mild steel's surface had retained the Zn and ESAp in the absence of corrosion attack. By covering the surface of the mild steel, the coating functions as a passive corrosion barrier. The presence of hard phases in the Zn-ESAp composite coating samples reduces the degree and kind of surface damage. Zn-8% ESAp + 2% starch stems exhibited less overall damage because the hard phases shield the stems from the damaging effects of the corrosion. Consequently, this result confirms that the essence of ESAp allows for reduced sample degradation. Moreover, the corrosion process would be slowed down since the superior dispersion of Zn and ESAp that starch promised assisted in sealing the coating's pores and limiting the paths that corrosive ions and the electrolyte might take.
Fig. 14b displays the corroded samples' EDS. It was evidence that Fe, C, and O were the visible elements in mild steel; however, the corroded sample containing only Zn with the absence of starch and ESAp show Fe, Zn, C, O, and Cl. Why the coated samples containing 8% ESAp and 8% ESAp + starch reveal Fe, Zn, C, O, Cl, Si, Ca, and Na. Compared to the other studied samples, the 8% ESAp + starch sample exhibits more diffraction peaks. This backs up the early findings that the 8% ESAp + starch sample formed more corrosion products that prevent the mild steel from further corrosion attack. The corroded product that forms may be ZnO, Zn(OH)2, CaO, CaCO3, and Na2O. Work by25,28 has yielded similar observations. It was evident that the corrosion attack had caused a significant variation in the EDS spectrum between the samples under investigation. The different oxide layers emerge, which help to form a thin film around the materials and halt further corrosion attacks on the 8% ESAp + starch sample was responsible for the lowest corrosion rate.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |