Iván
Marín
ab,
Rosa I.
Merino
ac,
Joaquín
Barberá
ab,
Alberto
Concellón
ab and
José L.
Serrano
*ab
aInstituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón (INMA), CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain. E-mail: joseluis@unizar.es
bDepartamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
cDepartamento de Física de la Materia Condensada, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
First published on 17th October 2023
Liquid crystal (LC) pillar[n]arenes have been barely explored due to their time-consuming and complicated synthesis, despite their promising properties for metal-ion separation, drug delivery, or surface functionalization. Herein, we report an easy and reliable method to functionalize pillar[n]arene macrocycles through electrostatic interactions. These ionic materials were prepared by ionically functionalizing a pillar[n]arene containing ten amine terminal groups with six different carboxylic acids. This supramolecular approach results in ionic pillar[n]arenes which self-organize into LC phases with good proton-conducting properties. Moreover, ionic functionalization provides a new amphiphilic character to the pillar[n]arenes, which self-assemble in water to produce a variety of nanoobjects (i.e., spherical or cylindrical micelles, vesicles, solid nanospheres, or nanotubes) that are capable of encapsulating a model hydrophobic drug. Interestingly, the presence of coumarin moieties in the chemical structure of the ionic pillar[n]arenes results in self-organized materials with light-responsive properties due to the ability of coumarins to undergo photo-induced [2+2] cycloaddition. In particular, we demonstrate that coumarin pohotodimerization can be employed to fabricate mechanically stable proton-conductive LC materials, as well as to obtain photo-responsive nanocarriers with light-induced release of encapsulated molecules.
Herein, we report for the first time the use of ionic non-covalent interactions to functionalize a pillar[n]arene macrocycle. This approach results in a new family of ionic pillar[5]arenes with unprecedented functional properties. In particular, we prepared ionic complexes between the terminal amine groups of a pillar[5]arene (P5N10) and several carboxylic acids (Fig. 1). Formation of ionic pairs leads to a hierarchical self-assembly process, in which the charged sites promote additional self-assembly that ultimately results in the formation of wide variety of nanostructured materials. In the solid state, the ionic pillar[5]arenes self-organized into LC phases with good proton-conducting properties; the ionic segregated areas (formed by the ionic salts) are the continuous ionic pathways necessary for proton transport. The same interactions that occurred in the solid state also appeared in aqueous solution, and these ionic pillar[5]arene self-organized in a large variety of assemblies, such as spherical or cylindrical micelles, vesicles, solid nanospheres, or nanotubes. Additionally, we introduced coumarin units in the chemical structure of some of our ionic pillar[5]arenes, and thus the resulting nanostructured materials displayed light-responsive properties due to the ability of coumarins to undergo photo-induced [2+2] cycloaddition.23,24 Specifically, LC phases were crosslinked to lock the LC arrangement and fabricate mechanical stable proton-conductive materials. In the case of the aqueous self-assemblies, coumarin units allowed obtaining photo-responsive nanocarriers that showed light-induced release of guest molecules.
As an example, the IR spectra of Acd1C11Cou, Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 and P5N10 are shown in the Fig. 2. In the CO region, Acd1C11Cou showed two stretching bands at 1733 and 1676 cm−1 that correspond to the ester groups of the coumarin moieties and to the dimeric form of the carboxylic acid, respectively. However, in the IR spectrum of Acd1C11Cou-P5N10, the dimeric band of the acid was replaced by two bands at 1555 and 1369 cm−1 due to asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the newly formed carboxylate groups, thereby indicating the formation of the ionic complex.
Fig. 2 FTIR spectra (CO st. region). (See Fig. S18 for the FTIR spectra in the complete frequency range, ESI†). |
The NMR spectra of the ionic complexes also confirmed the formation of the ionic salts. As an example, Fig. 3b displays the 1H NMR spectra of AcBzC11Cou, P5N10 and AcBzC11Cou-P5N10, in which the broad signal at 12.53 ppm of the carboxylic acid proton of AcBzC11Cou disappeared in the spectrum of the ionic complex AcBzC11Cou-P5N10. Moreover, the protons Ha and Hb of the methylene groups of P5N10 shifted from 3.81/2.91 to 3.91/3.30 ppm, respectively. The 13C NMR spectra also showed the ionic salt formation. For instance, the carboxylic acid carbon signal shifted from 167.00 to 167.94 ppm due to the formation of the carboxylate (Fig. 3c). The carbon adjacent to the carboxylic acid group shifted from 122.76 to 125.20 ppm, also evidencing the ionic complex formation (Fig. S11, ESI†).
Fig. 3 (a) Schematic representation of AcBzC11Cou-P5N10, (b) 1H NMR and (c) 13C NMR comparative of AcBzC11Cou-P5N10, AcBzC11Cou and P5N10. |
1H–1H NOESY experiments (Fig. S14, ESI†) were recorded to fully confirm the formation of the ionic salts. NOESY experiments are widely used in supramolecular chemistry as they provide information about the spatial relationships (distance) between molecules.29 In this case, meaningful correlations were observed between the signal Hb of P5N10 and the signal Hf of AcBzC11Cou, thereby indicating their proximity in the space because of the ionic bond formation.
Compound | T 2% (°C)a | Thermal transitionsb |
---|---|---|
a Temperature at which 2% of mass lost is detected in the TGA curve. b DSC data of the 2nd heating scan at a rate of 10 °C min−1. Ng: glassy nematic phase, N: nematic phase, Cr: crystal, I: isotropic liquid. c POM data. | ||
AcC11-P5N10 | 166 | Cr 142 I |
AcBzC11-P5N10 | 200 | Ng 108 N 161 I |
Acd1C11-P5N10 | 224 | N 120c I |
AcC11Cou-P5N10 | 135 | Cr 97 I |
AcBzC11Cou-P5N10 | 135 | Ng 44 N 116 I |
Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 | 226 | Ng 25 N 69 I |
The thermal and liquid crystal properties were studied by polarized-light optical microscopy (POM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and X-ray diffraction (XRD), and the results are summarized in Table 1. AcC11-P5N10 and AcC11Cou-P5N10 are crystalline materials that melt to give an isotropic liquid phase. Nonetheless, the introduction of benzoic acids into P5N10via ionic interactions led to ionic complexes that showed stable enantiotropic liquid crystal phases over a wide temperature range. Ionic complexes containing coumarin units (i.e., AcBzC11Cou-P5N10 and Acd1C11Cou-P5N10) exhibited lower isotropization temperatures than those of ionic complexes containing undecyl alkyl chains without terminal coumarin moieties (i.e., AcBzC11-P5N10 and Acd1C11-P5N10). While highly birefringent textures were observed by POM in AcBzC11-P5N10 and Acd1C11-P5N10, AcBzC11Cou-P5N10 and Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 showed spontaneous tendency to homeotropic alignment and the mesophase was observed via POM on applying mechanical stress to the samples (Fig. 4b). This spontaneous homeotropic alignment is induced by terminal coumarin units, which are known to produce such phenomenon in other liquid crystals containing coumarins.27
The assignment of the mesophase was achieved by XRD. The XRD patterns showed diffuse scattering in the low-angle region, whereas a broad diffuse scattering maximum was observed in the high-angle region that is related to the lateral interactions of the hydrocarbon chains (Fig. 4c). The absence of Bragg reflections and the presence of only diffuse scattering indicate that there is no periodical order, and thus such XRD patterns are consistent with nematic mesophases that have only orientational order. Although an increase in the number of alkyl substituents in the molecule (from 10 to 30) reduces the transition temperatures (i.e., both Tg and TN-I) (Fig. 4a), it does not significantly modify the type of the mesophase nor alter the degree of order with the nematic phase.
Examples of EIS data (in the form of Nyquist plots) are given in ESI,† Fig. S25. Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 and Acd1C11-P5N10 show a slightly depressed arc corresponding to the electrical response of the compound (conductivity and electrical permittivity), without relevant polarization contribution at the electron conducting electrodes at low frequencies. This is a strong hint that these compounds show electronic conduction, which dominates their electrical response. For the other compounds, AcC11-P5N10, AcBzC11-P5N10, AcC11Cou-P5N10 and AcBzC11Cou-P5N10, the Nyquist plots show a spike towards low frequencies, that is at the high values of Zreal, with fast increase of the absolute value of Zim. This corresponds to polarization of the electrodes, typical of ion blocking electronic conducting electrodes (such as ITO) on a mainly ionic conducting material. The dominant charge conduction carriers in those samples would be ions. Since diffusible ions other than protons are not present in the ionic LC pillar[5]arenes, the EIS responses were mainly related to proton conduction, which was calculated from the EIS responses and the cell constant. The conductivity was calculated from the value of Zreal at the minimum between the spike and the depressed semicircle or form the Zreal at low frequencies, as corresponds to each material, and the cell constant.
The conductivity of these materials as a function of the temperature is shown in Fig. 5a. At low temperatures Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 and Acd1C11-P5N10 showed the highest conductivity values very slightly dependent on temperature and apparently dominated by electronic carriers. We cannot give an explanation to this observation. In contrast, AcC11Cou-P5N10 and AcC11-P5N10 showed comparable conductivity values to Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 and Acd1C11-P5N10 at high temperatures, probably because their crystalline structure favors higher order in these compounds than in nematic mesophases. AcC11-P5N10 and AcBzC11-P5N10 and their counterparts with coumarin moieties show temperature dependent ionic conductivity that can be ascribed to proton conductivity, with relatively large activation energies from 0.8 eV to 1.4 eV in the measured temperature range. The proton conductivity is higher for AcC11-P5N10 than for AcBzC11-P5N10 and is smaller in the compounds with coumarin units with respect to the compounds without them. Conformational differences in the LC mesophases must be behind the differences in conductivity and activation energies. Smaller molecules such as AcC11-P5N10 with crystalline order would favor proton diffusion through shorter effective hopping distances.
Fig. 5 (a) Conductivity variation with temperature, measured by EIS, of (a) all ionic compounds measured (b) AcC11Cou-P5N10 and AcBzC11Cou-P5N10 before and after irradiation with 325 nm light. |
The conformational arrangement of the mesophases is expected to contribute strongly to the conductivity. The mobile protons are located at the COO−/NH3+ ionic bonds, around the pillar[5]ene macrocycle. Rod-shaped ionic pillar[5]arenes (i.e., AcC11Cou-P5N10 and AcC11-P5N10), which possess a crystal-ordered phase, show the highest ionic conductivity in the series. AcBzC11Cou-P5N10 and AcBzC11-P5N10, in which each benzoic ring has one substituent (10 alkyl chains per pillar[5]arene macrocycle) show also an elongated shape (rod shape), with a nematic phase range, less ordered. Their proton conductivity is lower than the ones without the benzoic ring (Fig. 6). In Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 and Acd1C11-P5N10, the presence of three substituents in each benzoic ring produces a total of 30 alkyl chains per pillar[5]arene macrocycle, probably resulting in a flatter conformation (disk shape). Such an ordering should make easier the proton hopping as long as the distance between molecules (and the ionic bond regions) are kept short. The presence of 30 times more alkyl chains per pillar[5]arene macrocycle might however be increasing the hopping distance (Fig. 6). Nevertheless, as the measured conductivity in these materials is dominated the electronic carriers, a change in the electronic charge distribution must have been produced.
Fig. 6 Schematic representation of rod and disk shape molecules containing coumarins aligned in the ITO-coated electrodes. |
Coumarin compounds undergo a well-known photoinduced [2+2] cycloaddition (so-called photodimerization) to form stable cyclobutene dimers when they are exposed to light of the appropriate wavelength (λ > 300 nm) (Fig. 7a). This photodimerization was previously exploited as a crosslinking reaction to fabricate mechanical stable membrane materials with a locked LC organization. As a representative example, in the Fig. 7b, the crosslinking of Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 in film of 25 μm is showed. Upon irradiation with 325 nm light, the intensity of the π–π* band of coumarin showed a remarkable decrease, and this is consistent with photodimerization of coumarin units that produced crosslinked polymer networks that retain the morphology of the LC phase. It is apparent that after crosslinking the conductivity values decreased approximately one order of magnitude due to a decrease in the mobility of ion-transporting moieties (Fig. 5b). Such ion conductivity decrease is similar to those of observed in previously reported polymerizable LCs.24 Nonetheless, a more dramatic reduction of proton conductivity was observed in Acd1C11Cou-P5N10, in which no EIS response was observed, suggesting a lack of ion transport in photocrosslinked Acd1C11Cou-P5N10. This fact can be explained by a total lack of mobility of the ion-transporting moieties (ionic pairs) due to the large number of peripheral photocrosslinkable units (coumarins).
Fig. 7 (a) Photodimerization reaction of coumarins followed by UV (b) and fluorescence (c) in the compound Acd1C11Cou-P5N10. |
As can be deduced from TEM studies, ionic complexes that incorporate terminal alkyl chains (AcC11-P5N10, AcBzC11-P5N10, and Acd1C11-P5N10) tended to self-assemble into solid nanostructures and the formation of hollow nanostructures (e.g., vesicles or nanotubes) seems to be unfavorable. However, ionic complexes containing terminal coumarin units (AcC11Cou-P5N10, AcBzC11Cou-P5N10, and Acd1C11Cou-P5N10) led to the formation of bilayer-based nano-assemblies, such as vesicles or nanotubes. The presence of terminal coumarin groups may increase the lateral π–π intermolecular interactions favoring the formation of stable bilayers that curve to generate vesicles (AcC11Cou-P5N10 and Acd1C11Cou-P5N10), or that bend to form tubular structures (AcBzC11Cou-P5N10).
Additionally, coumarin photodimerization may provide both a type of light-responsive nanocarriers or a facile method to produce cross-linked self-assemblies with enhanced robustness and stability.35,36 Therefore, we irradiated the corresponding aqueous solutions of the self-assemblies with 325 nm light for one hour. The photodimerization process was monitored by measuring the emission of the solutions. Irradiation with 325 nm light resulted in a gradual decrease of the coumarin emission band at ca. 400 nm (Fig. 7c). This photodimerization gave different morphology responses for each nano-assemblies based on coumarin-containing ionic complexes (Fig. 9). Both AcC11Cou-P5N10 and AcBzC11Cou-P5N10 collapsed, obtaining broken micelles with a non-defined structure (Fig. 9b) or a solid precipitate (Fig. 9d), respectively. Nonetheless, Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 yielded stable vesicles after light irradiation, but a significant size reduction was observed in comparison to the vesicles before irradiation (Fig. 9e and f).
Fig. 9 TEM micrographs of the nanostructures before (left) and after (right) photodimerization: (a) and (b) AcC11Cou-P5N10, (c) and (d) AcBzC11Cou-P5N10 and (e) and (f) Acd1C11Cou-P5N10. |
AcC11Cou-P5N10 and Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 (2 mg mL−1) self-assemblies were loaded with NR (1.0 × 10−6 M) by stirring overnight the aqueous solutions of the self-assemblies together with NR (diffusion method see ESI† for further details). Encapsulation of NR was confirmed by measuring the emission of the NR-loaded self-assemblies, which showed a strong emission band from 560 to 700 nm (λexcitation = 550 nm). Such strong NR emission indicates that NR is in a hydrophobic environment since it is encapsulated by the self-assemblies. Upon light irradiation, an abrupt decrease on the initial NR emission was observed in AcC11Cou-P5N10 due to a migration of NR to a non-hydrophobic environment. This fact can be explained by a complete NR release from the self-assemblies to the aqueous media. In contrast, Acd1C11Cou-P5N10 showed a gradual decrease of NR emission, suggesting a more controlled light-induced release of encapsulated molecules (Fig. 10).
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ma00698k |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |