Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Photoelectron angular distributions as sensitive probes of surfactant layer structure at the liquid–vapor interface

Rémi Dupuy a, Jakob Filser b, Clemens Richter a, Robert Seidel c, Florian Trinter ad, Tillmann Buttersack a, Christophe Nicolas e, John Bozek e, Uwe Hergenhahn a, Harald Oberhofer bf, Bernd Winter a, Karsten Reuter *a and Hendrik Bluhm *a
aFritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Faradayweg 4-6, 14195 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: Reuter@fhi-berlin.mpg.de; Bluhm@fhi-berlin.mpg.de
bChair for Theoretical Chemistry and Catalysis Research Center, Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85747 Garching, Germany
cHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany
dInstitut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Straße 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
eSynchrotron SOLEIL, L’Orme des Merisiers, Saint-Aubin - BP 48, 91192, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
fChair for Theoretical Physics VII and Bavarian Center for Battery Technology, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany

Received 25th July 2023 , Accepted 25th July 2023

First published on 9th August 2023


Abstract

Correction for ‘Photoelectron angular distributions as sensitive probes of surfactant layer structure at the liquid–vapor interface’ by Rémi Dupuy et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2022, 24, 4796–4808, https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP05621B.


The authors would like to correct a typographical error on page 4798, right column, second paragraph of subsection 2.4, where the ε value of the Lennard-Jones potential used for the Na+ ions was reported with an incorrect unit as 0.01814 kcal mol−1. The correct unit is kJ mol−1. The full correct sentence should thus read:

“For sodium cations, we used a Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential with ε = 0.01814 kJ mol−1 and σ = 3.206 Å.”

The correct value of ε = 0.01814 kJ mol−1 was used in all calculations, and thus the results of the calculations and the conclusions based on them are not affected by this error.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © the Owner Societies 2023
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.