Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Asymmetric total synthesis of four bioactive lignans using donor–acceptor cyclopropanes and bioassay of (−)- and (+)-niranthin against hepatitis B and influenza viruses

Ryotaro Otaa, Daichi Karasawaa, Mizuki Oshimabc, Koichi Watashibcd, Noriko Shimasakie and Yoshinori Nishii*a
aDepartment of Chemistry and Materials, Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Tokida 3-15-1, Uea, Nagano 386-8567, Japan. E-mail: nishii@shinshu-u.ac.jp
bDepartment of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Toyama 1-23-1, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan
cDepartment of Applied Biological Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Yamazaki 2641, Noda-shi, Chiba 278-8510, Japan
dResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Toyama 1-23-1, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan
eDepartment of Virology III, National Institution of Infections Deseases, Gakuen 4-7-1, Musashimurayama-shi, Tokyo 208-0011, Japan

Received 24th January 2022 , Accepted 31st January 2022

First published on 7th February 2022


Abstract

The asymmetric total synthesis of four lignans, dimethylmatairesinol, matairesinol, (−)-niranthin, and (+)-niranthin has been achieved using reductive ring-opening of cyclopropanes. Moreover, we performed bioassays of the synthesized (+)- and (−)-niranthins using hepatitis B and influenza viruses, which revealed the relationship between the enantiomeric structure and the anti-viral activity of niranthin.


Lignans are attracting considerable attention due to their widespread distribution in plants and their varied bioactivity.1–5 For example, matairesinol,2 dimethylmatairesinol,3 yatein,4 and niranthin5 are found in nature and exhibit e.g., cytotoxicity,2b,d,3b,4b anti-bacterial,2c anti-allergic,3c anti-viral,4d,5b,e anti-leishmanial,5d and strong insect-feeding-deterrent activity.4c Among these compounds, anti-viral compounds have received significant attention owing to the worldwide pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although niranthin exhibits anti-viral activity toward the hepatitis B virus (HBV),5b,e the enantiomeric SAR (structure–activity relationship) for the anti-viral activity of niranthin has not been revealed so far. To examine the SAR for a pair of enantiomers, an independent asymmetric synthesis of both enantiomers is necessary. However, the alternative synthesis of (−)- or (+)-niranthin has not been reported.6 During our recent studies on the transformation of cyclopropanes,7 we have reported a reductive ring-opening of enantioenriched donor–acceptor (D–A) cyclopropanes and its application to an asymmetric total synthesis of yatein.7i As a further extension of this synthetic method, we disclose here the asymmetric total synthesis of (−)-dimethylmatairesinol, (−)-matairesinol, (+)-niranthin, and (−)-niranthin. Moreover, the results of bioassays using (+)-niranthin and (−)-niranthin against HVB and influenza virus (IFV) are described (Scheme 1).
image file: d2ra00499b-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Some examples of bioactive dibenzyl lignans.

Scheme 2 outlines the enantioselective synthesis of optically active lactones 5a and 5b. Following our previous report,7i we attempted to synthesize the enantio-enriched bicyclic lactones 4a and 4b.


image file: d2ra00499b-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Enantioselective synthesis of key intermediates 5a and 5b.

Initially, the cyclopropanation of enal 1 with dimethyl α-bromomalonate 2 using the Hayashi–Jørgensen catalyst afforded the desired optically active cyclopropylaldehydes 3a and 3b in good to high yield with high ee.7c,e,h–j,8,9 The reduction of the aldehydes to alcohols and subsequent lactonization with p-TsOH afforded lactones 4a and 4b in high yield with high ee. The optical purity of lactones 4a and 4b were determined using HPLC analyses on a chiral column, and the ee values of the enantioselective cyclopropanations were estimated based on these HPLC analyses. Next, treatment of bicyclic lactones 4a and 4b with hydrogen in the presence of a catalytic amount of Pd–C in AcOEt at 0 °C resulted in a regioselective reductive ring-opening to furnish benzyloxylactones 5a and 5b in good to high yield with high dr and high ee. In the hydrolysis step, debenzylation of the benzyloxyaryl group did not occur under these mild conditions, i.e., in AcOEt at 0 °C.7i

For the α-benzylation of 5a and 5b to afford 6a–c, the corresponding substituted benzylhalides were necessary. 3-Methoxy-4-benzyloxybenzylbromide and 3,4-dimethoxybenzylbromide were easily prepared by known methods (for details, see the ESI); however, the preparation of 3,4-methylenedioxy-5-methoxybenzylbromide (16) required a modified procedure that involves the regioselective protection of the hydroxy group at the 3-position of 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzene (Scheme 3). The methylenedioxylation of gallic acid (10) during the first step resulted in a low yield of 11.10 Consequently, we successfully synthesized 12 using a cyclic boron-ester system.11 Arylmethylbromide 16 was derived from ester 12 in two steps in good to high yield.


image file: d2ra00499b-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Preparation of substituted benzylbromide 16.

Next, enolates were generated from lactones 5a and 5b using K2CO3 in DMF, and successfully attacked the benzylhalides on the less-hindered side to afford α-benzyl lactones 6a–c with excellent dr values (Scheme 4).7i,12 The trans-α,β-disubstituted lactones 7a–c were obtained via the hydrolysis of the α-methoxycarbonyllactones 6a–c followed by decarboxylation. The transformation from the enol form to the keto form gave the thermodynamically favored trans products (7a–c) with excellent dr values.7i,12 Finally, the debenzylation of 7a using a catalytic amount of Pd–C in methanol under a hydrogen atmosphere afforded matairesinol (7d) in 96% yield. Thus, the total syntheses of dimethylmatairesinol (7b) and matairesinol (7d) were achieved, and spectral data of these natural products were consistent with reported data.2e,3d The absolute configuration of these compounds were determined using the known data of optical rotation values. The reduction of lactone 7c using LAH afforded diol 8 in 91% yield (Scheme 4). Subsequent dimethylation of the resulting diol 8 using NaH and MeI furnished (−)-niranthin in 89% yield with 95% ee.13 Spectral data of (−)-niranthin was also consistent with reported data.5b,e,6 Following the total synthesis of (−)-niranthin, we also achieved the total synthesis of (+)-niranthin via an alternative enantioselective cyclopropanation using a different enantiomeric Hayashi–Jørgensen catalyst derived from D-proline instead of L-proline (Scheme 5).14


image file: d2ra00499b-s4.tif
Scheme 4 Alternative asymmetric total synthesis of dimethylmatairesinol, matairesinol, and (−)-niranthin.

image file: d2ra00499b-s5.tif
Scheme 5 Alternative asymmetric total synthesis of (+)-niranthin.

(−)-Niranthin has been reported to exhibit anti-HBV activity.5b,e Aiming to shed light on the relationship between its enantiomeric structure and activity, we performed a bioassay on the synthesized (−)- and (+)-niranthin against not only HBV, but also the influenza virus (IFV). The anti-HBV activity results are summarized in Fig. 1 and 2, while the anti-IFV activity is summarized in Fig. 3 (for details, see the ESI).


image file: d2ra00499b-f1.tif
Fig. 1 HBV-infection assay using (−)- and (+)-niranthin.

image file: d2ra00499b-f2.tif
Fig. 2 HBV-replication assay using (−)- and (+)-niranthin.

image file: d2ra00499b-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Growth-inhibition assay of IFV using (−)- and (+)-niranthin.

Based on the assays using HBV-infected HepG2-hNTCP-C4 cells and HBV-replicating Hep38.7-tet cells, the amount of HBs antigen decreased in a concentration-dependent manner without apparent cytotoxicity. The 50% inhibition concentration (IC50) in the HBV-infected cells was calculated to be 14.3 ± 0.994 μM for (−)-niranthin and 9.11 ± 0.998 μM for (+)-niranthin (Fig. 1), while the IC50 in the HBV-replicating cells was calculated to be 16.2 ± 0.992 μM for (−)-niranthin and 24.2 ± 0.993 μM for (+)-niranthin (Fig. 2). These results show that (−)-niranthin and (+)-niranthin exhibit anti-HBV activity, and that there is no remarkable difference between the anti-HBV activity of both enantiomers. In contrast, based on the bioassay of (−)- and (+)-niranthins against IFV using MDCK cells, cytotoxicity of (−)-niranthin appears at >400 μM judging that cell viability without IFV is less than 80%, and (−)-niranthin inhibited IFV-infection to cells in a concentration-dependent manner on the concentration range of non-cytotoxicity, and exhibits anti-IFV activity at 200–400 μM judging that cell viability with IFV is over 50% (Fig. 3). However, (+)-niranthin does not exhibit anti-IFV activity, and similarly to (−)-niranthin, cytotoxicity appears at >400 μM. Thus, the anti-IFV activity between (−)- and (+)-niranthins is clearly different. Our findings suggest that the enantiomeric site in niranthin endows (−)-niranthin with more potent anti-IFV activity than (+)-niranthin. We speculated that the anti-HBV active site of niranthin might be a part of the molecular structure such as aromatic groups which are far from chiral centers. In contrast, anti-IFV active site of niranthin might be closer to the chiral centers (Scheme 6).


image file: d2ra00499b-s6.tif
Scheme 6 A speculation for the bioactive site of niranthin against HBV and IFV.

Conclusions

We achieved the asymmetric total syntheses of four bioactive lignans: matairesinol, dimethylmatairesinol, (−)-niranthin, and (+)-niranthin. Key reactions include the Pd-catalyzed reductive ring-opening reaction of enantioenriched cyclopropanes under a hydrogen atmosphere and a highly stereoselective decarboxylation. Thus, we have achieved the first alternative total synthesis of (−)-niranthin and (+)-niranthin. Using the synthesized niranthin enantiomers, we investigated the relationship between the enantiomer structure and its anti-viral activity against the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the influenza virus (IFV). The results indicate that although the anti-HBV activity does not differ significantly between these two enantiomers, the anti-IFV activity of (−)-niranthin is more potent than that of (+)-niranthin. This result may be interpreted in terms of a different recognition of the enantiomeric structure of a bioactive compound among different virus species.

Author contributions

R. Ota: investigation for the synthesis of lignans. D. Karasawa: investigation for the synthesis of lignans. M. Oshima: investigation for bioassay of niranthin using HBV. K. Watashi: investigation for bioassay and writing original draft of bioassay using HBV. N. Shimasaki: investigation for bioassay and writing original draft of bioassay using IFV. Y. Nishii: methodology, investigation and writing – original draft.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Basic Areas (A) ‘20H00288’ and (C) ‘18K05120’ from the JSPS. We thank Prof. Mutsumi Kimura (Shinshu University) for the HRMS measurements.

Notes and references

  1. For reviews, see: (a) R. S. Ward, Nat. Prod. Rep., 1999, 16, 75 RSC; (b) M. Saleem, H. J. Kim, M. S. Ali and Y. S. Lee, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2005, 22, 696 RSC; (c) J.-Y. Pan, S.-L. Chen, M.-H. Yang, J. Wu, J. Shinkkonen and K. Zou, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2009, 26, 1251 RSC; (d) R. G. Reynolds, H. Q. A. Nguyen, J. C. T. Reddel and R. J. Thomson, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2022 10.1039/D1NP00057H , and other recent references cited therein.
  2. (a) T. H. Esterfield and J. Bee, J. Chem. Soc., Trans., 1910, 97, 1028 RSC; (b) T. Hirano, M. Gotoh and K. Oka, Life Sci., 1994, 55, 1061 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) Y. Kumarasamy, L. Nahar, P. J. Cox, L. N. Dinan, C. A. Ferguson, D. A. Finnie, M. Jaspars and S. D. Sarker, Pharm. Biol., 2003, 41, 203 CrossRef CAS; (d) S. Su, X. Cheng and M. Wink, J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 2015, 67, 1316 CrossRef CAS PubMed , for a reference of synthesis of matairesinol, see:; (e) P. C. Eklund, F. J. Sundell, A. I. Smeds and R. E. Sjöholm, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2004, 2, 2229 RSC.
  3. (a) D. Takaoka, N. Takamatsu, Y. Saheki, K. Kono, C. Nakaoka and M. Hiroi, Nippon Kagaku Kaishi, 1975, 12, 2192 CrossRef; (b) S.-T. Chang, D. S.-Y. Wang, C.-L. Wu, S.-G. Shiah, Y.-H. Kuo and C.-J. Chang, Phytochemistry, 2000, 55, 227 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) H. Tanabe, R. Fukutomi, K. Yasui, A. Kaneko, S. Imai, T. Nakayama and M. Isemura, J. Health Sci., 2011, 57, 184 Search PubMed , for a recent reference of synthesis of dimatairesinol, see:; (d) S. Yamauchi, A. Nishimoto, H. Nishiwaki, K. Nishi and T. Sugahara, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2020, 30, 127191 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. (a) P. B. McDoniel and J. R. Cole, J. Pharm. Sci., 1972, 61, 1992 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) M. Novelo, J. G. Cruz, L. Hernández, R. Pereda-Miranda, H. Chai, W. Mar and J. M. Pezzuto, J. Nat. Prod., 1993, 56, 1728 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J. Harmatha and J. Nawrot, Entomol. Exp. Appl., 2002, 104, 51 CrossRef CAS; (d) Y.-C. Kuo, Y.-H. Kuo, Y.-L. Lin and W.-J. Tsai, Antiviral Res., 2006, 70, 112 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. For the reference regarding the isolation of natural (−)-niranthin, see: (a) A. S. R. Anjaneyulu, K. J. Rao, L. R. Row and C. Subrahmanyam, Tetrahedron, 1973, 29, 1291 CrossRef CAS , for references regarding bioassays using isolated natural (−)-niranthin, see:; (b) R.-L. Huang, Y.-L. Huang, J.-C. Ou, C.-C. Chen, F.-L. Hsu and C. Chang, Phytother. Res., 2003, 17, 449 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) C. A. L. Kassuya, A. Silvestre, O. Menezes-de-Lima, D. M. Marotta, V. L. G. Rehder and J. B. Calixto, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 2006, 546, 182 CrossRef CAS PubMed , (anti-inflammatory); (d) S. Chowdhury, T. Mukherjee, R. Mukhopadhyay, B. Mukherjee, S. Sengupta, S. Chattopadhyay, P. Jaisankar, S. Roy and H. K. Majumder, EMBO Mol. Med., 2012, 4, 1126 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) S. Liu, W. Wei, K. Shi, X. Cao, M. Zhou and Z. Liu, J. Ethnopharmacol., 2014, 155, 1061 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. For a reference regarding the total synthesis of (±)-niranthin, see: G. E. Schneiders and R. Stevenson, Org. Prep. Proced. Int., 1982, 14, 1 CrossRef CAS.
  7. For selected references in last decade, see: (a) E. Yoshida, K. Nishida, K. Toriyabe, R. Taguchi, J. Motoyoshiya and Y. Nishii, Chem. Lett., 2010, 39, 194 CrossRef CAS; (b) D. Sakuma, J. Ito, R. Sakai, R. Taguchi and Y. Nishii, Chem. Lett., 2014, 43, 610 CrossRef CAS; (c) J. Ito, D. Sakuma and Y. Nishii, Chem. Lett., 2015, 44, 297 CrossRef CAS; (d) D. Sakuma, Y. Yamada, K. Sasazawa and Y. Nishii, Chem. Lett., 2015, 44, 818 CrossRef CAS; (e) S. Takada, K. Iwata, T. Yubune and Y. Nishii, Tetrahedron Lett., 2016, 57, 2422 CrossRef CAS; (f) S. Takada, T. Saito, K. Iwata and Y. Nishii, Asian J. Org. Chem., 2016, 5, 1225 CrossRef CAS; (g) K. Sasazawa, S. Takada, T. Yubune, N. Takaki, R. Ota and Y. Nishii, Chem. Lett., 2017, 46, 524 CrossRef CAS; (h) S. Takada, N. Takaki, K. Yamada and Y. Nishii, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2017, 15, 2443 RSC; (i) Y. Sone, Y. Kimura, R. Ota, T. Mochizuki, J. Ito and Y. Nishii, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2017, 2842 CrossRef CAS; (j) Y. Kimura, Y. Sone, T. Saito, T. Mochizuki and Y. Nishii, Asian J. Org. Chem., 2017, 6, 977 CrossRef CAS; (k) T. Saito, Y. Shimizu, Y. Araki, Y. Ohgami, Y. Kitazawa and Y. Nishii, Eur. J. Org. Chem., and other references cited therein,  DOI:10.1002/ejoc.202101213.
  8. For a reference regarding the asymmetric cyclopropanation using a Hayashi–Jørgensen catalyst, see: H. Xie, L. Zu, H. Li, J. Wang and W. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 10886 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. For references regarding the original Hayashi–Jørgensen catalyst, see: (a) M. Marigo, T. C. Wabnitz, D. Fielenbach and K. A. Jørgensen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 794 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) Y. Hayashi, H. Gotoh, T. Hayashi and M. Shoji, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 4212 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J. Franzén, M. Marigo, D. Fielenbach, T. C. Wabnitz, A. Kjærsgaard and K. A. Jørgensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 18296 CrossRef PubMed , for a recent review of total synthesis and patents using Hayashi–Jørgensen catalyst, see; (d) G. J. Reyes-Rodriguez, N. M. Rezayee, A. Vidal-Albalat and K. A. Jørgensen, Chem. Rev., 2019, 119, 4221 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. (a) C. Song, P. Zhao, Z. Hu, S. Shi, Y. Cui and J. Chang, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2010, 20, 2297 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) S. Takaoka, N. Takaoka, Y. Minoshima, J.-M. Huang, M. Kubo, K. Harada, H. Hioki and Y. Fukuyama, Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 8354 CrossRef CAS.
  11. (a) K. Cormier, R. D. Curry, M. P. Betsch, J. A. Goguen, C. M. Vogels, A. Decken, S. Turcotte and S. A. Westcott, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 2016, 53, 1807 CrossRef CAS; (b) G. R. Pettit and S. B. Singh, Can. J. Chem., 1987, 65, 2390 CrossRef CAS.
  12. (a) L. Ferrié, D. Bouyssi and G. Balme, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 3143 CrossRef PubMed; (b) K.-i. Yamada, T. Konishi, M. Nakano, S. Fujii, R. Cadou, Y. Yamamoto and K. Tomioka, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 5775 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. During the isolation process, a recrystallization of (−)-niranthin increased the ee value from 92% ee to 95% ee.
  14. Similar to (−)-niranthin, a recrystallization of (+)-niranthin increased the ee value from 94% ee to 96% ee.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d2ra00499b

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.