Qing Gao,
Yang Zang*,
Ju Xie
,
Yongchuan Wu and
Huaiguo Xue*
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225002, P. R. China. E-mail: zangyang@yzu.edu.cn; chhgxue@yzu.edu.cn
First published on 17th November 2021
In this work, an electrochemical sensor was designed for trace monitoring of bisphenol A (BPA) by decorating a hybrid bilayer molecularly imprinted membrane (MIM) on a multi-walled carbon nanotube-modified glassy carbon electrode. When BPA in the MIM was eluted, a composite molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor was constructed. Under optimal conditions, the developed sensor showed two linear relationships between ΔIp and BPA concentration in the range of 0.04 μM to 8 μM, as well as good selectivity and stability, and was also applied to detect BPA in water samples with desirable recoveries ranging from 92.0% to 107.0%.
Recently, several analytical methods, such as high-performance liquid chromatography, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, surface enhanced Raman scattering, fluorescence and enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay, have been developed for BPA detection.5–10 However, they still have some deficiencies, including high turnaround time, cumbersome pretreatment, false positive reaction and high cost, which inspires researchers to develop advanced BPA sensing devices. Fortunately, with the rapid progress of nanotechnology and material science, electrochemical sensors have attracted more and more attention because of their superiority in high sensitivity, simple instrument and minimal sample preparation. And many studies on the electrochemical determination of BPA have been reported as expected.11–13 For example, Wang et al. fabricated a mesoporous silica-based electrochemical sensor for sensitive determination of environmental hormone BPA, and the linear range from 0.22 μM to 8.8 μM was obtained with a detection limit of 0.038 μM.14 To further improve the sensor's detection selectivity, researchers have tried to combine various technologies with electrochemical methods.
Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), prepared by molecularly imprinted techniques, have high potential in electrochemical sensors due to their facile fabrication methods and the specific recognition of template molecule.15 For example, Haydar Ali et al. fabricated a molecularly imprinted polymer nanocomposite electrochemical sensor for selectively detecting BPA in the presence of various BPA analogues, which achieved the linear concentration range from 0.02 μM to 1.0 μM and a detection limit of 8 nM.16 Sahar Dadkhah et al. developed an electrochemical sensing of BPA based on amino-functionalized graphene oxide and molecularly imprinted polymer, displaying two typical linear ranges.17 Obviously, the construction of an effective molecular imprinted recognition element is the key to the preparation of molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensors (MIES).
In MIPs, the functional monomers with stronger molecular effects on template molecules can be conducive to the enhanced specific recognition of MIPs on target molecules. Commonly used functional monomers, such as acrylic acid and acrylamide, usually interact with the polar parts of the template molecule only through their polar groups (carboxyl group or amide group). If the spatial structure of a functional monomer well matches the spatial structure of template molecule, that is, the more sites it interacts with, the higher the specificity of functional monomer will be. In order to construct a functional monomer with strong specificity, pentene acyl-amino acyl-chitosan oligosaccharides (PAACO), that matched with the molecular structure of BPA, was prepared by the covalent attachment between the residues of amino acids and the polar groups of chitosan oligosaccharide (Scheme S2†). In particularly, the suitable amino acid residues can be screened out from common neutral amino acids based on quantitative calculation, and benefit to the higher specificity of the optimized oligomer.
In MIES designs, the MIP-based molecularly imprinted films were usually fixed on electrode surface due to the superior properties of the membrane, such as improving the adsorption capacity and mass transfer binding kinetics of the template molecule, and reducing the heterogeneity of the MIP. However, when PAACO is used in the MIM (especially prepared by bulk polymerization), the high permeability of the MIM results in the enhanced entry of template molecules due to the rigid substructure of chitooligosaccharide, but the sensitivity of the MIM decreased. In order to solve this problem, we propose a feasible strategy, that is, taking advantage of the controllable thickness of the electrochemical polymerization film,18,19 the polymer will be formed by electrochemical polymerization in the gap of the above highly permeable film. As long as the template molecules are insoluble in the polymer solution, the generation of the polymer can well improve the sensitivity of the MIM toward the template molecules.
In addition, to further improve the sensitivity of MIES, a proven effective strategy is to modify the electrode materials with high conductivity, such as graphene and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), platinum nanoparticle, gold nanoparticles. Among them, MWCNTs is a kind of one-dimensional quantum material with radial size of nanometer and axial size of micron order of magnitude, and both ends of the tube basically sealed.20 Compared with the other carbon nanocomposites, the introduction of MWCNTs not only easily achieve the capture probe molecules because of their coiled structure and strong π–π electronic interactions,21,22 but also largely amplify the electrochemical signal due to their high conductivity and large surface area.23,24 Furthermore, MWCNTs can also effectively increase the number of molecular recognition sites that close to the conducting site in the MIM. Thus, an advanced electrochemical sensing device may be developed by the combination of molecularly imprinted membrane and MWCNTs.
In this work, we selected functional monomer, 4-pentenoyl-isoleucyl-glucosamine (PIGA), with strong interaction on BPA through quantitative calculation, and prepared a permeable MIM by in situ bulk polymerization on MWCNTs modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) by using 4-pentenoyl-isoleucyl-chitosan oligosaccharide (PICO) as a functional monomer oligomer, BPA as a template and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) as a crosslinking agent. Then, a composite bilayer MIM could be fabricated by electrochemical polymerization of acrylamide (functional monomer) with the aid of template BPA and crosslinking agent methylene diacrylamide (Scheme 1). After the elution of BPA template from bilayer MIM, a novel BPA electrochemical sensor (denoted as BPA-MIM(MIPs)/MWCNTs/GCE) was fabricated successfully. Besides, differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) was used to investigate the electrochemical behaviour of BPA at the modified electrodes. The experimental parameters affecting the sensitivity of designed sensor were optimized. The analytical application and selectivity behaviour of the sensor were also determined.
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 The fabrication and detection procedures of designed electrochemical sensor based on the hybrid bilayer molecularly imprinted membrane of BPA. |
First, MWCNTs were dispersed in DMF by ultrasonication for 1 h to get a homogenous suspension (0.2 mg mL−1).25 Then, 4 μL of MWCNTs suspension was dropped onto freshly polished GCE surface and dried in air, the obtained electrode was marked as MWCNTs/GCE.
Second, the preparation of BPA-dual molecularly imprinted films on GCE was accomplished by a two-step polymerization process. Briefly, 8.4 mg of PICO and 4.41 mg of BPA were dissolved in 2.5 mL water and 2.5 mL DMF respectively, and mixed together. Then 85 μL of EGDMA and 0.5 mg AIBN (initiator) were added into the solution in turn. Place the reaction solution in the refrigerator and take it out after 5 h. Then the mixture was degassed with nitrogen for 5 min. Next, 5 μL of the solution was dropped on the center of the MWCNTs/GCE surface and a clean cover glass was used to cover the droplet. After that, the modified GCE was placed in a reactor and reacted at 65 °C for 8 h, then the primary modified electrode, called as BPA-MIM/MWCNTs/GCE, was obtained after peeling the cover glass gently.
Third, the secondary imprinting process was accomplished by electrochemical polymerization in an electrolyte containing 13 mg N,N′-methylene bisacrylamide (MBA), 0.11 mg acrylamide, 0.10 mg BPA and 1.2 mg ammonium persulfate (APS) in 1 mL of 0.3 M NaAc solution (pH 6.5), which was performed by cyclic voltammetry (CV) for 6 cycles on the BPA-MIM/MWCNTs/GCE, and the scanning potential ranged from −1.2 V to 0 V with a scan rate of 20 mV s−1.26 The resulting electrode was marked as BPA-MIM(MIPs)/MWCNTs/GCE. If only MBA is used in this process, the prepared electrode was called as BPA-MIM (PM)/MWCNTs/GCE.
Finally, the BPA-MIM(MIPs)/MWCNTs/GCE was soaked in the methanol solution containing 30% acetic acid under stirring for 25 min at room temperature to extract BPA molecules. For comparison, non-imprinted membrane (NIM) and non-molecularly imprinted polymers (NIPs) modified MWCNTs/GCE (denoted as NIM(NIPs)/MWCNTs/GCE) was also prepared in the same way without BPA. All sensors were preserved in a dryer.
The optimized geometries of BPA, PILEGA and their complex was showed in Fig. 1. In the molecular complex, two phenolic hydroxyl groups from BPA could form two hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group in the third carbon of the pyranose ring and the carbonyl oxygen of the pentenyl group, respectively. Besides, the presence of side chain residues in the isoleucine portion of the monomer makes the complex more stable. More information on the quantitative calculations can be available in the ESI.†
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Optimized conformations of the most stable complexes of BPA with PILEGA derived by Hartree–FockFig method with 6-31G(d) basis set. |
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 (A) The infrared spectra and (B) energy-dispersive spectrometry of PICO. The table data inserted in panel B is the result of PICO element analysis. |
When the PILEGA ratio was at 5:
100, the permeability of the film arrived at the peak value. Thereafter, the permeability reduced slowly with the increasing of film thickness. Therefore, the ratio of PILEGA to EGDMA in bulk polymerization was set as 5
:
100 to reduce the influence of membrane thickness in the subsequent experiment.
Second, the influence of various BPA/PILEGA ratios (2:
5, 2.5
:
5, 3
:
5, 3.5
:
5, 4
:
5) on sensor performance in bulk polymerization was surveyed under the conditions described above except BPA in the second polymerization process (Fig. S2†). When the BPA/PILEGA ratio was at 3.5
:
5, the DPV of the sensor achieved the highest current response, whereas the other sensors prepared with more or less BPA had a relatively weak DPV response. These results indicated that the imprinting sites generated by removing of BPA in the MIM increased with the increase of BPA before the molar ratio 3.5
:
5, and decreased after this value. This may attribute to the insolubility of BPA in water, and abundant BPA molecules could impede the generation of the electrochemical polymer in the interior of primary MIM. So, the optimum BPA/PILEGA ratio was 3.5
:
5.
For an electrochemical reversible process, the electrode performance was often investigated by the relationship between the peak current and the scanning speed using cyclic voltammetry. Refer to the Randles–Sevcik formula:29
Ip = 0.4463 × (F3/RT)1/2 × n3/2 × A × D01/2 × Cv1/2 | (1) |
Ip/v1/2 = KAC | (2) |
In this formula,
K = 0.4463 × (F3/RT)1/2 × n3/2 × D01/2 | (3) |
According to formula (2), the effective area of the electrode should be proportional to the slope of the Ip–ν1/2 curve.
The relationship between peak current (Ip) and square root of scan rate (ν) of polymeric film electrode, formed by MBA solution at different concentrations, was recorded by CV curves. As shown in Fig. S4,† Ip had a linear relation with ν1/2, and the higher the MBA concentration, the smaller the slope of Ip–ν1/2 curve.30,31 These results indicated that the membrane electrode was affected by diffusion control. Its performance was related to the effective area of the electrode, and the higher the concentration of MBA would lead to lower the effective area of the membrane electrode.
In the secondary printing process, MBA was used as crosslinking agent, acrylamide as functional monomer, BPA as the template molecule. Since the freedom degree of acrylamide polymerization was 2 and that of MBA was 4, the cross-linking degree of the polymer formed by copolymerization process was lower than that of MBA. Therefore, to achieve the electrochemical performance of secondary imprinted film, the concentration of MBA in the secondary imprinted polymer solution must be increased.
The amount of BPA also had a great effect on the electrochemical properties of the secondary imprinted film. Fig. S5† indicated the relationship between CV Ipa and ν1/2 of polymeric film electrode at 13 mg mL−1 MBA and different BPA concentrations. The addition of more BPA into polymerization solution resulted in the higher slope of Ip–ν1/2 curve. When the concentration of BPA was at 0.1 mg mL−1, the slope was less than that of the secondary polymerization film. If acrylamide was added in this case, the slope for the secondary imprinted film would be increased to the slope of the secondary polymeric film again.
The relationship between CV Ipa and ν1/2 of polymeric film electrode at different AA/BPA ratios (3.5:
1, 3.75
:
1, 4.0
:
1) (Fig. S6†) showed that the slop of Ip–ν1/2 curve at 3.75
:
1 was close to that of the secondary polymer film. Thus, the concentrations of MBA and BPA in the secondary imprinted polymerization solution were 13 mg mL−1 and 0.1 mg mL−1, respectively, and the ratio of AA/BPA was selected as 3.75
:
1.
The scanning cycles of CV in the process of secondary imprinting also has a great influence on the performance of the polymer film. The relationship between Ip and ν1/2 of secondary imprinted film electrode prepared at different scanning cycles (n = 5, 6, 7) was recorded in Fig. S7,† which indicated that the slop of Ip–ν1/2 curve at 6 scanning cycles was the closest to that of the secondary polymerization membrane. Fig. S8† further confirmed the effect of CV scanning cycles on the performance of designed sensor. When the scanning number was at 6, the maximum of ΔIp was observed. Meanwhile, as shown in Fig. S9,† the continuous scanning of electrochemical sensor enabled the declined DPV response, accompanied by the increase of secondary imprinting film thickness. When the number of scan cycles reached the 6th cycle, the obtained CV curve had little change compared to the shape of the 5th cycle. Based on this, the scanning cycles of CV was set at 6.
To compare BPA-independent DPV responses of the primary imprinted film and composite imprinted film prepared with or without MWCNTs, the incubation time of different modified electrodes was tested in the test solution at 2.0 μM BPA every 3 min. As shown in Fig. S12,† DPV peak current of the primary imprinted film reached the platform region within 10 min (curve a), while the composite imprinted films with (curve b) or without (curve c) MWCNTs took 33 min and 30 min to reach the relatively stable level, respectively. These results illustrated that the primary imprinted film had a relatively fast kinetic process, whereas the adsorption kinetics of the composite imprinted film gradually slowed down. Because the adsorption kinetics has little influence on the adsorption accuracy after 33 min. Thus, 33 min was selected as an optimal incubation time.
A small amount of MWCNTs, observed on the surface of polymer film, could provide more conductive area for as-prepared electrode. The formed nanopores on MIM surface, ascribed to the nitrogen released by AIBN decomposition, could increase the effective reactive sites and further improve the membrane's permeability.
In the process of secondary imprinted electropolymerization, MIPs were deposited near the conductive sites in the imprinted film gap, and most of nanopores could be filled by the generated polymer, resulting in a slightly smooth surface. However, the membrane surface resulted from secondary imprinting had no significant change. After eluting the BPA molecules, the number of recognition sites in BPA-MIM complex largely increased, leading to an enhanced sensitivity for electrochemical sensor.
As a control, sensors without MWCNTs were prepared and the same tests were performed. As displayed in Fig. S13,† there were two linear relationships between peak current and BPA level in the range from 0.04 μM to 8 μM. The corresponding linear regression equations were ΔIp = 0.32725 + 3.85589C (μM) (R = 0.99454) in 0.08–0.2 μM and ΔIp = 0.89421 + 0.7136C (μM) (R = 0.99866) in 0.2–6.0 μM, respectively. Obviously, the addition of MWCNTs improved the sensitivity of developed sensor.
The detection limit (LOD) of designed sensor was calculated to be 8 nM (S/N = 3). As a result, the prepared sensors were excellent candidates compared to the other types of MIES for BPA assays. For comparison, several molecularly imprinted BPA sensors with different materials and modifications reported in literature were listed in Table S2.† Compared to other reported sensors, the MIM(MIPs)/MWCNTs/GCE sensor achieved satisfactory sensitivity, acceptable dynamic range and low detection limit due to the introduction of MWCNTs and double-layer molecular imprinting.
It is not difficult to see that, compared with the content in section of the effect of the secondary MIM on test performance, excluding the influence of NIM, the effect of BPA concentration on the response of the sensor after secondary imprinting polymerization was up to 12% in the range of 0.5–2 μM. With the increase of BPA concentration, this effect gradually decreased, which suggested that the performance of the secondary imprinted polymer after adsorption of template molecules was close to that of the secondary polymer film.
Three measurements of MIM(MIPs)/MWCNTs//GCE at 1.0 μM BPA were used to assess the reproducibility of designed electrochemical sensor. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the sensors was calculated about 3.5%. In addition, the repeatability and stability of the sensors were also evaluated by the same way. The sensor sustained more than 90% of the original test value after storage in a sealed capsule at room temperature for 20 days. The RSD of the sensor after 3 continuous scanning was 3.3%. These results displayed that this electrochemical sensor can be reusable and storable.
Sample no. | Added (μM) | Found (μM) | RSD (%) | Recovery (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tap water | 0.5 | 0.46 | 4.33 | 92 |
1.0 | 1.07 | 3.85 | 107 | |
1.5 | 1.46 | 3.13 | 97.3 | |
2.0 | 1.91 | 4.94 | 95.5 | |
Mineral water | 0.5 | 0.53 | 3.48 | 106 |
1.0 | 0.94 | 4.23 | 94 | |
1.5 | 1.59 | 3.65 | 106 |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Chemical structure of BPA and PICO, quantum chemical simulation, conditions optimization, and comparison of different sensors of BPA. See DOI: 10.1039/d1ra04924k |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |