Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Resonance energy transfer-assisted random lasing in light-harvesting bio-antenna enhanced with a plasmonic local field

Partha Kumbhakar, Subrata Biswas and Pathik Kumbhakar*
Nanoscience Laboratory, Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, 713209, India. E-mail: pathik.kumbhakar@phy.nitdgp.ac.in; nitdgpkumbhakar@yahoo.com

Received 8th October 2019 , Accepted 6th November 2019

First published on 19th November 2019


Abstract

Thanks to the advent of the random laser, new light applications have opened up, ranging from biophotonic to security devices. Here, by using the well-known but unexplored light-harvesting bio-pigment of butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea, CT) flower extract, generation of continuous-wave (CW) random lasing at ∼660 nm has been demonstrated. Furthermore, a wavelength tunability of ∼30 nm in the lasing emission was obtained by utilizing the resonance energy transfer (RET) mechanism in a gain medium with a binary mixture of CT extract and a commercially available methylene blue (MB) dye as the gain medium. In the CT extract–dye mixture, the bio-pigments are acting as donors and the MB dye molecules are acting as acceptors. Amplification in intensity of the lasing emission of this binary system has further been achieved in the presence of optimized concentrations of metal (Ag)–semiconductor (ZnO) scattering nanoparticles. Interestingly, the lasing threshold has been reduced from 128 to 25 W cm−2, with a narrowed emission peak just after loading of the Ag nanoplasmon in the ZnO-doped binary gain medium. Thanks to the strong localized electric field in the metal nanoplasmon, and the multiple scattering effects of ZnO, the lasing threshold was reduced by approximately four times compared to that of the gain medium without the use of scatterers. Thus, we believe that our findings on wavelength-tunable, non-toxic, biocompatible random lasing will open up new applications, including the design of low-cost biophotonic devices.


1. Introduction

The laser, almost 60 years after its invention, has become a key light source in modern imaging systems. However, a conventional laser has a high degree of spatial coherence, which produces unwanted coherent imaging artefacts, such as the formation of speckles. Therefore, researchers are now putting enormous effort into devising an unconventional laser system, called a random laser (RL), which is free from such drawbacks.1–3 Demonstrations of random lasing have been reported with both pulsed and continuous-wave (CW) pumping.4–12

Generally, long-wavelength or near-infrared (NIR) (>650 nm) fluorescent dyes have high penetration properties in tissue.13–15 Therefore, they can be fruitfully used for biomedical and biophotonic applications, such as in surgical therapy treatments, cancer diagnostics, etc.13–16 However, these dyes have some drawbacks, including poor photostability, low absorption at specific pump wavelength, non-biodegradability, toxicity, and also expense.1,13–16 Therefore, they are not appropriate in biomedical and biophotonics applications. Recently, environmentally friendly, non-toxic, optically active bioorganic dyes extracted from natural resources, such as carotene, porphyrins, chlorophylls, etc., have become the obvious choice as the gain medium in RL generation. Use of these dyes has many advantages;8,10,17,18 for example, they (1) are biodegradable and biocompatible, (2) have efficient light-harvesting capabilities in the long-wavelength region, and (3) have higher molar extinction coefficients to enable efficient light harvesting. Additionally, these bio-pigments are available in large quantity, and can be safely extracted from fruits, flowers and leaves.8–10,17–20 Here, we have selected a biocompatible natural organic dye, namely extract of butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea, CT), a medicinal plant, which is used extensively as a natural colouring agent around the world.17 This flower extract has already been used as a substitute for commercial toxic blue dye in different medical and food packaging sectors.18,19 The blue colour of the extract in neutral aqueous solution indicates the presence of different flavonoid and anthocyanin content, as reported by others.18,19 Such optically active biodegradable organic dyes provide a unique possibility for RL generation in combination with metal/semiconductor nanoparticles (NPs) as the scattering particles.4–6,21–23 Traditionally, it has been reported that, RL generation is dependent on multiple scattering of light in a random gain medium. The presence of the strong electric field of metal NPs may enhance these scattering properties, and may also modify the transition rates of nearby dye molecules.4–6 Random lasing has been obtained in several materials, such as metal/semiconductor NPs, human tissue, liquid crystals, fluorescent polymers, commercial dyes, etc.4–7,21–23

At present, there is a huge demand for multi-coloured random laser sources in the medical and optoelectronics sectors. The resonance energy transfer (RET) process is another strategy to achieve tunable emission, with improved emission intensity from a gain media.24–27 The minimum requirement for the occurrence of energy transfer in the RET process is the availability of good overlap between the emission band of the donor and the absorption band of the acceptor.4 One example, is a mixture system with more than one dye, in which one (donor) dye efficiently absorbs the pump radiation, and then the excitation energy is non-radiatively transferred to the second (acceptor) dye.6,24–27

Here, we demonstrate RET-assisted CW RL generation using a bioorganic pigment as the gain medium, which is biodegradable and cheap. Also, we have improved the lasing efficiency and achieved tunable emissions by employing a RET process in which CT dye molecules transfer energy to methylene blue (MB) dye. The mechanism of the energy transfer has also been studied by analyzing the optical properties of the mixtures of donor and acceptor after encapsulation in a polymer film. A significant reduction in lasing threshold, from 128 to 25 W cm−2, has been demonstrated, with systematic increase in the number and concentration of scatterers (ZnO and Ag NPs). Thorough analysis of the RL emission allowed us to infer the role of the energy transfer process and the presence of semiconductor and plasmonic NPs in enhancing the lasing emission. The unprecedented demonstration of RET-assisted tunable random lasing in this work indicates that natural pigments can be effectively utilized to develop cost-effective random lasers using easy processing steps.

2. Results and discussion

The UV-visible absorption spectrum of the bio-pigment was measured and is shown in Fig. 1a. The presence of Q-bands at ∼533 nm, ∼573 nm, and ∼618 nm are clearly seen in Fig. 1a. We also studied the photoluminescence (PL) emission spectrum of the extracted pigment (Fig. 1a), which was found to be consistent with the visible PL emission peak at ∼660 nm corresponding to the S1 → S0 transition. Digital photographs of the butterfly pea and the extraction of pigments in water are also shown in Fig. 1a (right inset). To determine the presence of different functional groups in the organic pigments, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data were collected and are shown in Fig. 1b. From Fig. 1b it can be seen that several functional groups, such as –CH, –C[double bond, length as m-dash]O, –OH, are present in the bio-pigment. The presence of hydroxyl groups (Fig. 1b) helps the anthocyanins to absorb light in the visible region.18 The existence of a strong absorption band at ∼632 nm and a good PL emission peak at ∼660 nm facilitated the use of this bio-pigment as a gain medium in the RL experiment, as shown later. The PL emission of the pigment in the solution phase was measured at different input pump intensities (IP) of a He–Ne laser with λpump = 632.8 nm, as shown schematically in Fig. 1c. The results obtained are shown in Fig. 1d and e. Although amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) was observed, narrowing of the spectral profile, as well as a distinct threshold, was not observed, even after increasing the pump intensity.
image file: c9ra08166f-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) UV-visible absorption and PL emission spectra of natural CT dye extract. Right inset (upper panel) shows digital photographs of the flower and its extraction in water (lower panel). (b) FTIR spectrum of CT. (c) A schematic illustration of CW excitation and PL emission of the bio-pigment in solution phase. (d) Emission spectra of the CT dye extract without scatterers at different IP intensities. (e) Emission intensity from CT excited by 632.8 nm under different IP without scatterers. (f) The normalized absorption spectra (1 and 2) and the PL emission spectra (3 and 4) of CT and MB dye in water. (g) A schematic illustration of the RET process in the metal–semiconductor-based dual-colour random laser under CW pumping.

Therefore, to overcome such drawbacks, i.e. low laser emission at NIR region as well as tunability in lasing emission, the RET process has been employed as an important strategy. It was found that there is good overlap between the emission band of CT (solid red line) and the absorption band of MB (solid black line) (Fig. 1f), confirming the possibility of efficient energy transfer (ET) from the donor (CT) to the acceptor (MB) dye. The calculated value of the overlap integral is J(λ) = 2.94 × 1015 nm4 M−1 cm−1 using eqn (1),6

 
image file: c9ra08166f-t1.tif(1)
where FD(λ) is the total normalized PL intensity (area under the curve) of pigments in the wavelength range λ + Δλ and ε(λ) is the molar extinction coefficient of the MB dye at λ.

The origin of the emission tunability and details of the tuning mechanism for the lasing emission using the RET process are illustrated schematically in Fig. 1g. The input energy of the pump light (632.8 nm) is mostly absorbed by CT molecules. The excited CT molecules partially transfer their energy to the MB molecules, leading to the dual-colour emission at ∼660 nm (near red) and ∼692 nm (deep red), respectively. It was found that the output emission intensity from the donor increased rapidly once the pump intensity exceeded the lasing threshold energy, while some residual acceptor emission was also found to increase slowly. As the acceptor/donor (A/D) ratio increased further, the lasing threshold of the acceptor showed a stable output from the donor/acceptor mixture system. Furthermore, after addition of semiconductor and metal NPs as scatterers in the random system, multiple scattering significantly disturbed the random system and decreased the lasing threshold, by dynamically changing the strong local electromagnetic field.4,5 Thus, the RET process greatly influences the multi-colour RL under single excitation conditions. In addition, we have measured stability of the MB dye with laser exposure time (Fig. S1) and it was clearly seen that there is almost no change in emission intensity after laser irradiation for a duration up to 15 min (for details see ESI), and only a 10% reduction in intensity after 45 min.

Fig. 2a represents the PL emission spectra of the RET-based binary system with different volume ratios of the acceptor and donor. Two clear emission bands (red and cyan arrow) for the CT and MB dyes, centred at ∼660 nm and ∼692 nm, are observed under 632.8 nm excitation. The A/D ratio was changed in order to control the RET efficiency (Fig. 2b). A coefficient known as the energy transfer coefficient (ηET)27 was calculated using eqn (2), to describe the ET processes physically in the semiconductor–metal-based binary random lasing system. The expression for ηET is given as,

 
ηET = IA/(IA + ID), (2)
where IA is the integrated emission intensity of MB dye at ∼692 nm and ID is the integrated emission intensity of CT at ∼660 nm. It was found that, as we increased the A/D ratio from 0 to 7.33, the intensity of the emission band corresponding to CT quenches, while the intensity of the emission corresponding to the MB dye increases gradually under excitation at 632 nm (Fig. S2). The evolution of ηET with A/D ratio is demonstrated in Fig. 2b. As the A/D ratio increases from 0.85 to 19.0, the RET coefficient is also found to increase and reaches saturation at A/D = 7.33 (Fig. 2b).25


image file: c9ra08166f-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) Normalized PL emission spectra of CT and MB dye with different A/D ratios. (b) Effective RET efficiency as a function of A/D ratio in the binary system.

The PL emission spectra of the bio-pigment in the presence of scatterers with appropriate concentrations are shown in Fig. 3. The microstructural properties of rod-like ZnO and triangular Ag NPs are shown in the typical SEM and TEM images in Fig. 3a and b. The absorption spectra of ZnO and Ag NPs can also be seen to have a spectral overlap with the emission spectra of the bio-pigment, as shown in Fig. 3c. The presence of a broad absorption peak at ∼600 nm is due to the in-plane dipole resonance in the triangular Ag NPs.8 The large scattering property of ZnO NPs, which is due to the contrast in refractive index in the gain medium, provides multiple scattering leading to the observation of ASE.27–29 The results are shown in Fig. 3d and indicate that the amplification is not sufficient to achieve proper lasing emission at low pumping energy using only ZnO NPs. Therefore, to achieve further increase in the output intensity of the solution, metal NPs were used as an additional scatterer to provide strong, multiple scattering through enhancement of the electromagnetic field (Fig. 3e). The changes in emission intensity with a fixed concentration ratio of ZnO and triangular-shaped Ag NPs are shown in Fig. 3e and it can be seen that effective light amplification takes place and some lasing peaks have appeared on top of the emission band (inset in Fig. 3e). The dependence of the integrated normalized emission intensity of the pigments on input pump intensity, in the presence of scatterers, is shown in Fig. 3f. From Fig. 3f, a lasing threshold (CWIth) of 128 W cm−2 was obtained after addition of an optimized concentration of ZnO (nZnO = 7 × 1012 ml−1) and Ag NPs (CAg = 12 × 1015 ml−1) in the random system.


image file: c9ra08166f-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) SEM image of ZnO NPs. (b) TEM image of triangular Ag NPs. (c) Normalized absorption spectra of ZnO and Ag NPs with absorption-emission spectra of the CT dye. Emission spectra of CT dye extract in the presence of (d) ZnO only and (e) ZnO–Ag NP scatterers at different input intensities. The inset shows an enlarged section of the emission pattern, where we can easily observe generation of the RL mode. (f) Emission intensity from CT–ZnO (left) and CT–ZnO–Ag (right) solution excited by 632.8 nm under different input intensities.

It can be seen from the plot (Fig. 3f, left) that within the pump energy used there is only one kink when ZnO NPs are used as the scatterer in the CT dye. However, two kinks are clearly visible (Fig. 3f, right) in the presence of the binary scatterer, i.e. ZnO and Ag NPs in the CT dye,3 indicating the transition from spontaneous emission (SE) to amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) and to lasing. Therefore, from the results shown in Fig. 3f (right), it can be concluded that, even with the low pump energy used, lasing is observed in the CT dye by using the binary scatterer, since the metal NPs have caused further enhancement of the electromagnetic field of the pump light by surface plasmon resonance processes.

To demonstrate RL generation in the near-IR region, with significant improvement in the lasing emission of the gain medium, the dye mixture was encapsulated in a homogeneously dispersed aqueous solution of a polymer matrix, as shown in Fig. 4a (details of the procedure are in given in the Experimental section). Fig. 4b shows the emission spectra of samples with optimized scatterer concentrations at two input pump intensities of 10 W cm−2 and 135 W cm−2. Depending on the different A/D ratios with energy transfer efficiency, different scenarios have been observed. At low A/D concentration ratio (A/D = 0.85), the emission peak intensity of the CT dye at ∼660 nm is found to be stronger than that of the emission peak intensity of the MB dye at ∼692 nm. As the value of IP increases, from 10 to 135 W cm−2, a large number of lasing peaks appear on top of the emission band at ∼660 nm, which is clear from Fig. 4b, and those peaks fluctuate randomly.6,30–32 On the other hand, a relatively low, intense, broad emission band for the MB dye is observed at ∼692 nm. Upon further increase in the A/D ratio (from 1.5 to 7.33), more energy is non-radiatively transferred to the acceptor, which prevents lasing of the donor and helps spectral narrowing of the acceptor (Fig. 4b).33 Therefore, it can be concluded that the emission intensity ratios are greatly influenced by the variation in A/D ratio in such random binary systems. Additionally, for a fixed A/D ratio, the appearance of a number of sharp peaks increased with increasing IP value, indicating the occurrence of RL at high values of input energy. It can be seen from Fig. 4b that there are some random spikes appearing that cover the wavelength range beyond 700 nm, and at around 750 nm when the pump intensity is at its highest. From static PL emission measurements of the MB dye only, it was found that some shoulder peaks appear at ∼750 nm; so, the peaks at ∼750 nm in Fig. 4b might have appeared due to emission from the MB dye. However, further studies are required to find the exact origin of peaks other than those appearing at ∼660 nm and ∼692 nm. Continuing our study of the switching of emission with A/D ratio, the change in CIE colour chromaticity with increasing A/D has also been calculated, as shown in Fig. 4c. In the CIE 1931 colour diagram, the circles describe the calculated colour chromaticity of the binary mixture at different A/D ratios (Fig. 4c). It was observed that, with increasing A/D ratio, the chromaticity values of the multi-colour RL varied from (0.69, 0.29) to (0.54, 0.21) under the same pumping energy of 135 W cm−2. The results shown in Fig. 4d were obtained by multi-peak fitting of the corresponding emission spectra. In Fig. 4d, the transition from SE to ASE and then to random lasing emission in the binary system can be seen. However, the position of the random lasing emission is solely dependent on the A/D ratio. At low A/D ratio (0.85), the binary system shows random lasing emission at ∼660 nm, corresponding to the CT dye with two clear kinks, whereas, at this ratio, the emission from the MB dye at ∼692 nm is of a spontaneous type (Fig. 4d). On the other hand, at high A/D ratio (4.50), the binary system exhibits random lasing emission at ∼692 nm due to energy transfer from the CT dye to the MB dye. To study the changes in RL emission intensity, if any, with respect to the number of measurements, the lasing emission spectra in the gain media with optimized A/D ratios of 0.85 and 4.50 were collected up to 95 times at a fixed pump laser excitation intensity of 135 W cm−2. The corresponding results for the two narrow spikes obtained at ∼660 nm and ∼692 nm with an A/D ratio of 0.85 and 4.50, respectively, are shown in Fig. 4e. It can be seen that the fluctuations in peak intensity from their average values at ∼660 nm and 692 nm are very small. However, it was found that the RL peak at 660 nm was the most intense for an A/D ratio of 0.85, whereas the peak appearing at 692 nm was the most intense for an A/D ratio of 4.50. So, this indicates that the peak intensity at ∼692 nm can be enhanced with increasing A/D ratio. Thus, switching of the lasing emission can be achieved by varying the mixing ratio of the donor and acceptor dyes.


image file: c9ra08166f-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) Representation of the preparation process for the polymer films. The resulting composite film is then pumped using a CW He–Ne laser (λpump = 632.8 nm) and the emission from the film is collected and sent to a spectrometer with a detector for analysis. (b) Normalized emission spectra from random systems with different A/D ratio of (i) 0.85, (ii) 1.50, (iii) 4.50, (iv) 7.33, are excited by 632.8 nm under low and high IP energy. The concentration of the ZnO and Ag NP suspensions are 7 × 1012 ml−1 and 12 × 1015 ml−1, respectively. (c) Switching of colour chromaticity of the emission spectra with different A/D ratio, extracted from the spectra in Fig. 2a. (d) Variation of lasing intensity with different IP at the two peaks of CT (∼660 nm) and MB (∼692 nm) at A/D ratios of 0.85 (upper panel) and 4.50 (lower panel), and observation of their threshold behaviour. (e) The variation in emission intensity of the observed narrow spikes (at ∼660 nm and 692 nm) with the number of measurements carried out in a sample with optimized A/D ratios and for a fixed excitation energy of 135 W cm−2.

In order to study the dependency on the direction of the lasing emission from the polymer film, lasing was measured at different emission angles. Fig. 5a shows a schematic of the position of the detector for collecting the emission spectra at different angles (θ = 0 to 180°) with respect to the incident CW excitation. Fig. 5b shows the polar graph of the integrated emission intensity versus the detection angles (θ) of the lasing emission and it can be seen that the emission intensity depends strongly on the angle. It was observed that the lasing emission intensity is highest at θ ≅ 60°. Therefore, subsequently, the RL emission data have only been collected at an angle of 60°.


image file: c9ra08166f-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (a) Schematic representation showing the detection of lasing emission at different angles. (b) Polar graph of integrated emission intensity at different detection angles.

In an optical gain medium, disordered structure can offer random lasing via multiple scattering in the medium by changing the scattering length, and this conclusion has been supported by measurement of the mean free path of the binary system. The minimum mean free path (lmin) of the photons in the polymer film was calculated using eqn (3),30

 
image file: c9ra08166f-t2.tif(3)
where, n and d are the refractive index and thickness, respectively, of the CT–MB–ZnO composite polymer film, and the value of lmin was found to be ∼0.28 mm. As reported previously, random lasing is also observed in a weakly scattering regime (klmin ≫ 1).34,35 Therefore, our system has acted as an extremely weak scattering medium (lmin ∼ 0.28 mm), which does not help to achieve band narrowing or distinguish threshold behaviour as expected. Therefore, we introduced a plasmonic enhancer (i.e. triangular Ag NPs) into the random system, which can greatly enhance the local electrical field.5,6,35 In order to investigate the significance of Ag NPs on the random system, different concentrations of ZnO and Ag NPs were carefully mixed in the polymer matrix with different donor–acceptor ratios. Fig. 6a and b shows the RL emission spectra of the polymer films obtained under different input intensity in the absence and presence of Ag NPs, but for the same number density of ZnO NPs. To determine the dependence of the scatterer concentration on CWIth, the number density of the ZnO NPs (nZnO) was varied from 2 × 1012 to 20 × 1012 ml−1, as shown in Fig. 6a and S3. It was observed that, with the increase in the number density of ZnO NPs from 2 × 1012 to 20 × 1012 ml−1, CWIth was reduced significantly, from 107 W cm−2 to 43 W cm−2, as shown in Table 1 and Fig. S3. The dependence of the input pump energy on the integrated emission intensity in the CT–MB–ZnO system (with nZnO = 20 × 1012 ml−1), as depicted in the inset in Fig. 6a, shows a typical ASE nature, with a threshold value of 43 W cm−2. In the case of CW operation, CWIth was not as distinct as it is often observed to be during pulsed mode operation, since under CW conditions spontaneous emission may significantly influence the threshold.36


image file: c9ra08166f-f6.tif
Fig. 6 The emission spectra of CT–MB medium in the presence of the ZnO scatterer (nZnO = 7 × 1012) at different IP energies (a) without Ag NPs and (b) with Ag NPs (nZnO = 20 × 1012 and CAg = 36 × 1015 ml−1), respectively. The inset shows the threshold behaviour of the random system for RL generation in the MB dye. (c) Normalized emission spectra of polymer films containing a mixture of CT and MB dye with ZnO (nZnO = 20 × 1012 ml−1) and Ag NPs (CAg = 36 × 1015 ml−1) under low (red line) and high (black line) IP energy. (d) RL generation in polymer film with three different A/D ratios and in the presence of ZnO (nZnO = 20 × 1012 ml−1) and Ag NPs (CAg = 12 × 1015 ml−1) under an IP energy of 68 W cm−2.
Table 1 Experimentally obtained values of lasing threshold of the binary mixture
  CT–MB and ZnO (×1012 ml−1) CT–MB–ZnO (nZnO = 20 × 1012 ml−1) and Ag NP (×1015 ml−1)
Concentrations 2 7 13 20 12 24 36
CWIth (W cm−2) 107 83 60 43 35 33 25


However, with the addition of Ag NPs, CWIth is reduced significantly, as shown in Fig. 6b. It can be clearly seen that the emission spectra of the polymer film with Ag NPs has multiple peaks, as shown in Fig. 6b, with the central lasing peak at ∼692.4 nm narrowed down compared with that without Ag NPs (Fig. 6a) for the same pumping energy. The lasing threshold value of the random system has decreased by up to four orders of magnitude due to the presence of Ag NPs (Fig. S3 and Table 1). This result indicates the occurrence of random lasing in the presence of Ag NPs, and the lasing modes are generated due to multiple scattering of trapped photons and enhancement of the local field inside the gain medium.5,6,24–26 The narrowed, sharp emission occurring at ∼692.4 nm (Fig. 6c) in CT–MB–ZnO–Ag was obtained after the input energy exceeded the threshold value. When the input pump intensity exceeds the threshold, the bandwidth of the central peak becomes narrowed, which signifies the occurrence of random lasing. Furthermore, with increasing the number density of ZnO and Ag NPs, the value of the bandwidth is reduced significantly due to enriched multiple scattering. The normalized output characteristics of the binary random lasing system, shown in Fig. 6d, have been significantly affected due to the change in the mixing ratio of the donor and the acceptor. The central wavelength peaks of the emission have shifted positions, indicating that the ET between CT and MB dyes caused switching of the lasing emission by ∼30 nm.

The output emission spectra of the binary system were found to be tunable by adjusting the addition of different concentrations of Ag NPs, as shown in Fig. 7a. The normalized emission spectra, as shown in Fig. 7b, clearly show reduction of the lasing threshold from 107 to 25 W cm−2, and the threshold value decreased by ∼76% after addition of Ag NPs in the presence of ZnO NPs (nZnO = 20 × 1012 ml−1) in the binary system.


image file: c9ra08166f-f7.tif
Fig. 7 (a) Scatterer-dependent ASE/lasing spectra of the films; average results in the formation of sharp narrow peaks. (b) The comparison between the effects of injection of Ag NPs on the value of threshold. (c) Q-factor as a function of different A/D ratio at the same scatterer concentration. (d) Q-factor as a function of concentration of Ag NPs at ∼692.4 nm.

The maximum value of the electric field is located on the surface edges of the Ag NPs.7,8,28 Therefore, we believe that this experiment clearly demonstrates that it is possible to achieve low threshold and efficient random lasing by engineering the plasmonic NPs in organic semiconductor thin films. The quality factor (Q-factor) is another important parameter and has been calculated using eqn (4),

 
Q = λ0λ, (4)
where λ0 is the central peak wavelength and Δλ is the mode bandwidth. The value of the Q-factor was calculated by fitting the central mode of the emission spectra.

In addition, the Q-factor is inversely proportional to the energy loss rate of a mode and is a signature of the lasing threshold for a random system.37 Fig. 7c shows that, as the A/D ratio changed, the value of the Q-factor changed from 627 to 1024. Fig. 7d shows the variation in Q-factor as a function of Ag NP concentration, and it was found that Q = 1081 is the best value for the highest concentration of Ag NPs. This indicates that the presence of both ZnO and Ag NPs has significantly improved the laser efficiency.

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, here we have reported biocompatible CW RL generation, from the natural light-harvesting bio-antenna of butterfly pea flower extract. The positive influence of metal–semiconductor NPs on the bio-pigment leads to enhanced lasing emission at ∼660 nm. In addition, RET-based tunable NIR random lasing is demonstrated at ∼692 nm by using the natural dye, i.e. CT extract, and the common, commercially available MB dye. It has been shown that significant reduction in lasing threshold, band narrowing, wavelength tunability in RL emission of over 30 nm from 660 to 692 nm and generation of lasing mode are possible by addition of Ag NPs into the ZnO-doped CT–MB binary system, which is due to the enhancement in the local electric field in triangular-shaped Ag NPs. The biocompatible random laser developed here could provide a new tool for imaging in biological tissues. In addition, we believe that our findings offer a cost-effective approach for optimizing a tunable multi-colour plasmonic RL, avoiding the need to resort to specially engineered, expensive and toxic dyes.

4. Experimental section

Materials and synthesis procedure for ZnO and Ag nanoparticles

Zinc nitrate hexahydrate, (Aldrich) potassium hydroxide (Sigma), MB dye (Fluka), silver nitrate and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) (Sigma) were reagent grade and were used as received without further purification. The synthesis of zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs was carried out by the solvothermal route. First, 4.0 M solution of potassium hydroxide (KOH) was added drop-wise to a 0.5 M solution of zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O) under vigorous stirring to obtain a turbid solution. The solution was then put into an autoclave and maintained at 130 °C for 8 h. After completion, the autoclave was allowed to cool and the precipitate separated by centrifugation and washing with deionized (DI) water and then dried at room temperature for 24 h. Colloidal triangular silver nanoparticles were synthesized by chemical techniques using a similar procedure to that used previously in our group38 (for details see ESI).

Extraction of pigments from flowers

Extraction of pigments from Clitoria ternatea petals was carried out using a very simple method, as described below. In brief, the petals were cut into small pieces and dipped into a beaker with a certain volume of DI water. After 24 h, the blue-coloured solution was separated from the mixture using a filter paper (pore diameter ∼ 50 μm) and then was collected in a separate test tube. The collected blue-coloured solution contained flavonoids, anthocyanins, polyphenolic compounds, monoglycosides, diglycosides, etc., as confirmed by FTIR measurement.

Sample characterizations

The morphology and microscopic structures of ZnO and Ag samples were observed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Zeiss) with an acceleration voltage of 5–10 kV, and by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM, acceleration offset voltage 200 kV). The sizes of the ZnO and Ag NPs were measured from the FESEM and TEM images. The UV-visible absorption spectra were measured in a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-3010, wavelength range 200–800 nm). The photoluminescence (PL) emission properties were determined using a PL spectrofluorometer (PerkinElmer LS-55).

Preparation of polymer film

First, a clear solution of PVA hydrogel mixture was prepared with CT and MB binary dye mixtures and NPs of ZnO and Ag. Then, PVA solutions were drop-casted onto a glass substrate and left to dry under a controlled atmosphere. The dried flexible film had a thickness of ∼68 μm, measured from the FESEM image (see inset in Fig. 4a).

Random lasing experiment

Fig. 4a shows a schematic of the experimental set up for measuring RL emission characteristics. The prepared polymer film was pumped by a CW He–Ne laser (power of ∼5 mW) with a wavelength of 632.8 nm, and with the surface of the film placed at the focus of a lens with focal length 10 cm. The RL emission spectra were captured at an angle of 60° using an optical spectrometer (Avaspec-2048) through an optical fiber. Finally, all RL emission data were recorded and analyzed by computer.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Department of Science & Biotechnology, Government of West Bengal for the partial financial support through project Grant No.: Grant-in-Aids no. 332(Sanc.)/ST/P/S and T/16G-24/2018 dt. 19.03.2019. Partha Kumbhakar is grateful to TEQIP-III, CoE, GOI and MHRD, NIT Durgapur, Government of India for providing a maintenance fellowship.

References

  1. D. S. Wiersma, Nat. Phys., 2008, 4, 359–367 Search PubMed.
  2. B. Redding, M. A. Choma and H. Cao, Nat. Photonics, 2012, 6, 496 CrossRef CAS.
  3. Y. Liu, W. Yang, S. Xiao, N. Zhang, Y. Fan, G. Qu and Q. Song, ACS Nano, 2019, 13, 10653–10661 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. E. Heydari, I. P. Santos, L. M. L. Marzan and J. Stumpe, Nanoscale Horiz., 2017, 2, 261–266 RSC.
  5. X. Meng, K. Fujita, S. Murai, T. Matoba and K. Tanaka, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 1374–1378 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. Z. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Shi, D. Liu, R. Yu, S. Wei, Z. Lin Wang and Q. Chang, Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 15091–15098 RSC.
  7. W. Zhang, N. Cue and K. M. Yoo, Opt. Lett., 1995, 20, 1023–1025 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. S. Biswas and P. Kumbhakar, Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 18812–18818 RSC.
  9. J. Q. Grim, S. Christodoulou, F. D. Stasio, R. Krahne, R. Cingolani, L. Manna and I. Moreels, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2014, 9, 891–895 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. V. S. Gummaluri, S. R. Krishnan and C. Vijayan, Opt. Lett., 2018, 43, 5865–5868 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. M. Athanasiou, R. Smith, B. Liu and T. Wang, Sci. Rep., 2014, 4, 7250 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. M. A. Noginov, I. N. Fowlkes, G. Zhu and J. Novak, Phys. Rev. A, 2004, 70, 043811–043816 CrossRef.
  13. R. Steiner, H. P. Berlien and G. H. Muller, Applied Laser Medicine, Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 101–106 Search PubMed.
  14. H. Jelinkova, Woodhead Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials Publisher, Woodhead Publishing, 2013 Search PubMed.
  15. F. Lahoz, I. R. Martín, M. Urgellés, J. M. Alonso, R. Marín, C. J. Saavedra, A. Boto and M. Díaz, Laser Phys. Lett., 2015, 12, 045805–045811 CrossRef.
  16. D. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Wang, D. Luo, U. Chitgupi, J. Geng, Y. Zhou, L. Wang, J. F Lovell and J. Xia, Biomed. Opt. Express, 2017, 8, 113 Search PubMed.
  17. G. Calogero, A. Bartolotta, G. D. Marco, A. D. Carlo and F. Bonaccorso, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 3244–3294 RSC.
  18. R. Croce and H. Van Amerongen, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2014, 10 Search PubMed.
  19. J. M. Kong, L. S. Chia, N. K. Goh, T. F. Chi and R. Brouillard, Phytochemistry, 2003, 64, 923–933 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. T. Fossen, L. Cabrita and O. M. Andersen, Food Chem., 1998, 63, 435–440 CrossRef CAS.
  21. A. G. Ardakani and P. Rafieipour, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 2018, 35, 1708–1716 CrossRef CAS.
  22. R. C. Polson and Z. V. Vardeny, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2004, 85, 1289–1291 CrossRef CAS.
  23. L. Ye, B. Liu, F. Li, Y. Feng, Y. Cui and Y. Lu, Laser Phys. Lett., 2016, 13, 105001–105008 CrossRef.
  24. L. Cerda, E. Enciso, V. Martin, J. Banuelos, I. L. Arbeloa, A. Costela and I. G. Moreno, Nat. Photonics, 2012, 6, 621–626 CrossRef.
  25. J. F. G. Lopez and M. I. C. Lopez, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 9665–9669 CrossRef.
  26. C. S. Wang, Y. L. Chen, H. Y. Lin, Y. T. Chen and Y. F. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2010, 97, 191104–191107 CrossRef.
  27. X. Shi, J. Tong, D. Liu and Z. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2017, 110, 171110 CrossRef.
  28. R. Zhang, S. Knitter, S. F. Liew, F. G. Omenetto, B. M. Reinhard, H. Cao and L. Dal Negro, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2016, 108, 011103 CrossRef.
  29. H. Cao, Y. G. Zhao, S. T. Ho, E. W. Seelig, Q. H. Wang and R. P. H. Chang, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999, 82, 2278 CrossRef CAS.
  30. T. Zhai, X. Zhang, Z. Pang, X. Su, H. Liu, S. Feng and L. Wang, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 4295–4298 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. Y. Wan, Y. An and L. Deng, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 16185–16192 CrossRef PubMed.
  32. H. Cao, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 2005, 38, 10497–10535 CrossRef CAS.
  33. J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 3rd edn, 2006 Search PubMed.
  34. X. Wu, W. Fang, A. Yamilov, A. A. Chabanov, A. A. Asatryan, L. C. Botten and H. Cao, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys., 2006, 74, 053812–053823 CrossRef.
  35. X. Meng, K. Fujita, S. Murai and K. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys., 2009, 79, 053817–053824 CrossRef.
  36. Y. Zhang and S. R. Forrest, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2011, 84, 241301–241304 CrossRef.
  37. P. Wang, X. Zhang, M. Gavryliak, Y. Xiang and J. Xu, Opt. Express, 2015, 23, 24407–24415 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. K. Mondal, S. Biswas and P. Kumbhakar, Plasmonics, 2019 DOI:10.1007/s11468-019-01016-6.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9ra08166f

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.