Mehmet Lütfi Yolaa,
Necip Atar*b,
Tanju Erenb,
Hassan Karimi-Malehc and
Shaobin Wang*d
aDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey
bDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey. E-mail: necipatar@gmail.com
cDepartment of Chemistry, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran
dDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. E-mail: shaobin.wang@curtin.edu.au
First published on 26th August 2015
Correction for ‘Sensitive and selective determination of aqueous triclosan based on gold nanoparticles on polyoxometalate/reduced graphene oxide nanohybrid’ by Mehmet Lütfi Yola et al., RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 65953–65962.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 DPV profiles of the electrochemical sensor at different TCS concentrations in phosphate solution pH 7.0 from background without TCS to 50.0 nM TCS (A), and linear calibration curve of TCS (B). |
Additionally, two of the values presented in Table 1 in the original manuscript are incorrect. The “Recovery (%)” value for the “Wastewater” sample with 9.0 nM added TCS should be 100.0 ± 0.02, rather than 99.8 ± 0.6. The “Found TCS (nM)” value for the “Lakewater” sample with 6.0 nM added TCS should be 7.67 ± 0.02, rather than 9.67 ± 0.02. The corrected version of Table 1 is shown below.
Sample | Added TCS (nM) | Found TCS (nM) | Recovery (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Wastewater | — | 3.10 ± 0.03 | — |
3.0 | 6.03 ± 0.02 | 98.9 ± 0.5 | |
6.0 | 9.02 ± 0.04 | 99.1 ± 0.4 | |
9.0 | 12.1 ± 0.02 | 100.0 ± 0.2 | |
Lakewater | — | 1.66 ± 0.06 | — |
3.0 | 4.65 ± 0.04 | 99.8 ± 0.6 | |
6.0 | 7.67 ± 0.02 | 100.1 ± 0.2 | |
9.0 | 10.6 ± 0.05 | 99.4 ± 0.3 |
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |