Cellulose-immobilized NHC–Cu(I) complex: an efficient and reusable catalyst for multicomponent synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles

Ali Pourjavadi* and Zahra Habibi
Polymer Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Avenue, P. O. Box 11365-9516, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: purjavad@sharif.edu

Received 16th September 2015 , Accepted 9th November 2015

First published on 11th November 2015


Abstract

A novel cellulose supported copper NHC complex has been prepared by the reaction of cellulose supported imidazolium salt with copper(I) iodide. The catalyst is active in the synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles via a one-pot reaction of alkyl/benzyl halides or tosylates and terminal alkynes, with sodium azide in water.


Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions are exergonic fusion processes that unite two unsaturated reactants and provide fast access to an enormous variety of five-membered heterocycles.1 The cycloaddition of azides and alkynes to give triazoles is arguably the most useful member of this family.2 The classical method for their synthesis involved thermal 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition.3 However, this procedure was associated with elevated temperature, low yields and lack of selectivity. Independent discoveries by Sharpless et al. and Meldal et al. demonstrated that in the presence of a Cu(I) catalyst, this cycloaddition could be performed regioselectively, affording exclusively the 1,4 disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles.2,4 This chemistry has found wide application in various disciplines including materials science, chemical biology, and medicinal chemistry.5 Several members of the 1,2,3-triazole family have indeed shown interesting biological properties, such as anti-allergic, anti-bacterial, and anti-HIV activity.6

During the last 20 years, N-Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHCs) have been extensively studied in organometallic synthesis and catalysis.7 As strong σ-donors and weak π-acceptors, the NHC ligands have a stronger interaction with the metal center compared to phosphine ligands, thereby enhancing the stability of NHC complexes toward heat and moisture.8 Recently, several papers were reported about the remarkable activity of supported and unsupported [(NHC)CuX] complexes (X = Cl, Br) in the 1,3-dipolar Huisgen cycloaddition.9 Such catalytic systems have already been applied to the preparation of triazole-containing carbanucleosides, porphyrins, and platinum-based anticancer drugs, as well as to the development of a latent catalyst for this transformation.10

Recently, biopolymers such as alginate, cellulose, chitosan, gelatine, starch and wool have been used as supports for catalytic applications.11 Several interesting features of the biopolymers for example, bio-degradable, environmentally safe, high sorption capacity, physical and chemical versatility make them attractive to use as supports.

Abdelmouleh et al. reported the surface modification of cellulose (CL) fibers with silanes coupling agents.12 Recently, Koga et al. reported in situ modification of cellulose paper with 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane for catalysis Knoevenagel condensation between aldehydes or ketones and active methylene compounds.13

Based on the understanding described above, herein, we report the synthesis of novel heterogeneous catalyst containing NHC anchored in CL, as well as its application for the multicomponent 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of terminal alkynes and organic azides generated in situ from sodium azide and different organic halides or tosylates.

The process for the preparation of CL supported copper NHC complex is schematically described in Scheme 1. First, the grafting of the imidazolium salt (NHC ligand precursor) onto the CL support followed by reaction with sub-stoichiometric amount of copper(I) iodide and sodium tert-butoxide, to afford NHC–Cu/CL.


image file: c5ra19075d-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Schematic description for the preparation of NHC–Cu/CL.

FT-IR spectroscopy of CL-IL showed a new medium absorption band at 1572 cm−1 for C[double bond, length as m-dash]N stretching (Fig. 1).


image file: c5ra19075d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 FT-IR spectra of cellulose (blue), grafted imidazolium salt (red), and NHC–Cu/CL (green).

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was further used to study the thermal behavior and stability of the NHC–Cu/CL. TGA indicates the catalyst stable up to 231 °C (Fig. 2).


image file: c5ra19075d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 TGA plots of CL and NHC–Cu/CL.

The morphology of Fig. 3a–c shows representative SEM images of the as-received CL and NHC–Cu/CL. The density and distribution of the NHC–Cu group on the NHC–Cu/CL nanocomposite were evaluated by quantitative energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping. As can be seen in Fig. 3d–g, rather than only being located at the edges of the graphene sheets, the elements Cu, Cl, I and Si were found to be uniformly dispersed on the whole surface of the NHC–Cu/CL nanocomposite indicating the homogeneous distribution of the NHC–Cu.


image file: c5ra19075d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 SEM images of (a) CL and (b and c) NHC–Cu/CL, and corresponding quantitative EDS elemental mapping of (d) Cu, (e) Cl, (f) I and (g) Si.

The catalytic activity of the NHC–Cu/CL composite as catalyst was then tested in multicomponent 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of terminal alkynes and organic azides generated in situ from sodium azide and different organic halides or tosylates. To optimize the reaction conditions, benzyl bromide, sodium azide and phenylacetylene were tested as model substrates in the presence of various solvents (Table 1). The results indicate that both reaction temperature and solvent significantly influence the product yield in the coupling reaction. After several screening experiments with different combinations, the best ones were proved to be NHC–Cu/CL (1 mol% of Cu), benzyl bromide (1 mmol), sodium azide (1.2 mmol), phenylacetylene (1.3 mmol) and H2O (3 mL) at 50 °C for 1 h.

Table 1 Screening of the reaction conditionsa
Entry Solvent Temp. (°C) Yieldb (%)
a Benzyl bromide (1.0 mmol), sodium azide (1.2 mmol), phenylacetylene (1.0 mmol), solvent (3 mL), NHC–Cu/CL (1 mol% of Cu), 1 h.b Isolated yield.
1 H2O 50 98
2 H2O/EtOH (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) 50 83
3 EtOH 50 61
4 PhCH3 50 20
5 CHCl3 50 65
6 CH3CN 50 73
7 H2O 60 98
8 H2O 40 81


Using the optimized reaction conditions, it was then attempted to expand the scope of organic halides or tosylates and terminal alkynes in water at 50 °C, using 1 mol% NHC–Cu/CL (Table 2). Electron donating substituents like methyl, methoxy (entries 2 and 3), and electron withdrawing substituents such as acetyl, nitro groups at para position of benzyl bromide (entry 4) were equally effective toward the nucleophilic substitution of azide, followed by 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition. However, in case of non-activated alkyl halides like n-hexyl bromide as well as n-octyl bromide, the reaction required longer reaction time and furnished corresponding triazoles in lower yields (Table 2, entries 5 and 6). Unfortunately, the catalytic system was less effective for the reaction of benzyl chlorides (Table 2, entries 7–9). Benzyl and allyl tosylate reacted well and giving good yields (Table 2, entries 10 and 11). Furthermore, by using various substituted phenylacetylenes with substituents that have different electronic properties, different yields of the final products were achieved. The aryl acetylene bearing electron-donating group (p-Me) and electron withdrawing group (p-CF3) reacted well and giving good yields (Table 2, entries 12 and 13).

Table 2 Multicomponent 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition catalyzed by NHC–Cu/CLa

image file: c5ra19075d-u1.tif

Entry R1 X R2 Yieldb
a Organic halide or tosylate (1.0 mmol), sodium azide (1.2 mmol), terminal alkyne (1.0 mmol), H2O (3 mL), NHC–Cu/CL (1 mol% of Cu), 1 h.b Isolated yield.c Reaction time = 3 h.
1 Ph Br Ph 98%
2 4-CH3C6H4 Br Ph 94%
3 4-CH3OC6H4 Br Ph 91%
4 4-NO2C6H4 Br Ph 98%
5 C5H11 Br Ph 82%
6 C7H15 Br Ph 84%
7c Ph Cl Ph 90%
8c 4-CH3OC6H4 Cl Ph 79%
9c 4-NO2C6H4 Cl Ph 85%
10 Ph OTs Ph 98%
11 CH2[double bond, length as m-dash]CH OTs Ph 97%
12 Ph Br 4-CH3C6H4 98%
13 Ph Br 4-CF3C6H4 90%


The heterogeneous nature of the catalysis was proved using a hot filtration test and AAS analysis. To determine whether the catalyst is actually functioning in a heterogeneous manner or whether it is merely a reservoir for more active soluble copper species, we performed a hot filtration test in the multicomponent 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of benzyl bromide, sodium azide and phenylacetylene after ∼50% of the coupling reaction is completed. The hot filtrates were then transferred to another flask containing H2O at 50 °C. Upon the further heating of catalyst-free solution for 6 h, no considerable progress (∼3% by GC analysis) was observed. Moreover, using AAS of the same reaction solution at the midpoint of completion indicated that no significant quantities of copper (∼1%) are lost to the reaction liquors during the process.

The recyclability of the NHC–Cu/CL composite was also examined by the multicomponent 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition. It was found that the recovery can be successfully achieved in seven successive reaction runs (Table 3).

Table 3 Reusability of the NHC–Cu/CL composite in multicomponent 1,3-dipolar cycloadditiona
a Benzyl bromide (1.0 mmol), sodium azide (1.2 mmol), phenylacetylene (1.0 mmol), H2O (3 mL), NHC–Cu/CL (1 mol% of Cu), 1 h, 50 °C.b Isolated yield.
Reaction cycle 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th
Yieldb (%) 98 98 98 97 97 96 96


Conclusions

We have successfully developed a novel, practical and environmentally friendly method for the multicomponent 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition by using NHC–Cu/CL as catalyst. In addition, this methodology offers the competitiveness of recyclability of the catalyst without significant loss of catalytic activity, and the catalyst could be readily recovered and reused for seven cycles, thus making this procedure environmentally more acceptable. Further studies are currently underway in our laboratories and results will be disseminated in due course.

Notes and references

  1. R. Huisgen, in 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry, ed. A. Padwa, Wiley, New York, 1984 Search PubMed.
  2. V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin and K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 2596 CrossRef CAS.
  3. (a) R. Huisgen, G. Szeimies and L. Moebius, Chem. Ber., 1965, 98, 4014 CrossRef CAS; (b) R. Huisgen, Pure Appl. Chem., 1989, 61, 613 CrossRef CAS; (c) R. Huisgen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1963, 2, 565 CrossRef.
  4. C. W. Tornøe, C. Christensen and M. Meldal, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 3057 CrossRef.
  5. M. Meldal and C. W. Tornøe, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 2952 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. G. C. Tron, T. Pirali, R. A. Billington, P. L. Canonico, G. Sorba and A. A. Genazzani, Med. Res. Rev., 2008, 28, 278 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. (a) D. T. Cohen and K. A. Scheidt, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 53 RSC; (b) A. Grossmann and D. Enders, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 314 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) G. C. Fortman and S. P. Nolan, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 5151 RSC; (d) S. P. Nolan, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 91 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) S. Diez-Gonzalez and S. P. Nolan, Aldrichimica Acta, 2008, 41, 43 CAS.
  8. (a) D. Bourissou, O. Guerret, F. P. Gabbai and G. Bertrand, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 39 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) W. A. Herrmann and C. Kocher, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 2162 CrossRef CAS; (c) W. A. Herrmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1290 CrossRef CAS.
  9. (a) J.-M. Collinson, J. D. E. T. Wilton-Ely and S. Diez-Gonzalez, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 11358 RSC; (b) M.-L. Teyssot, A. Chevry, M. Traikia, M. El-Ghozzi, D. Avignant and A. Gautier, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 6322 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) F. Lazreg, A. M. Z. Slawin and C. S. J. Cazin, Organometallics, 2012, 31, 7969 CrossRef CAS; (d) T. Nakamura, T. Terashima, K. Ogata and S.-I. Fukuzawa, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 620 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) W. Wang, J. Wu, C. Xia and F. Li, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 3440 RSC; (f) S. C. Sau, S. R. Roy, T. K. Sen, D. Mullangi and S. K. Mandal, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2013, 355, 2982 CrossRef CAS; (g) J. D. Egbert, C. S. J. Cazin and S. P. Nolan, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3, 912 RSC.
  10. S. Diez-Gonzalez and S. P. Nolan, Angew. Chem., 2008, 120, 9013 CrossRef.
  11. (a) W.-L. Wei, H.-Y. Zhu, C.-L. Zhao, M.-Y. Huang and Y.-Y. Jiang, React. Funct. Polym., 2004, 59, 33 CrossRef CAS; (b) K. R. Reddy, N. S. Kumar, B. Sreedhar and M. L. Kantam, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2006, 252, 136 CrossRef CAS; (c) D. Q. Zhou, M. He, Y. H. Zhang, M. Y. Huang and Y. Y. Jiang, Polym. Adv. Technol., 2003, 14, 287 CrossRef CAS; (d) X. Zhang, Y. Geng, B. Han, M.-Y. Ying, M.-Y. Huang and Y. Y. Jiang, Polym. Adv. Technol., 2001, 12, 642 CrossRef CAS; (e) K. Huang, L. Xue, Y.-C. Hu, M.-Y. Huang and Y.-Y. Jiang, React. Funct. Polym., 2002, 50, 199 CrossRef CAS; (f) S. Wu, H. Ma, X. Jia, Y. Zhong and Z. Lei, Tetrahedron, 2011, 6, 250 CrossRef.
  12. (a) M. Abdelmouleh, S. Boufi, A. Ben Salah, M. N. Belgacem and A. Gandini, Langmuir, 2002, 18, 3203 CrossRef CAS; (b) M. Abdelmouleh, S. Boufi, M. N. Belgacem, A. P. Duarte, A. Ben Salah and A. Gandini, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 2004, 24, 43 CrossRef CAS.
  13. H. Koga, T. Kitaoka and A. Isogai, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 9356 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra19075d

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.