Functional modification mediated value addition of seaweed polysaccharides – a perspective

A. K. Siddhanta *ab, Naresh D. Sanandiya a, Dharmesh R. Chejara ab and Stalin Kondaveeti a
aMarine Biotechnology and Ecology Division, CSIR-Central Salt & Marine Chemicals Research Institute, G B Marg, Bhavnagar 364002, Gujarat, India. E-mail: aks@csmcri.org; Fax: +91-278-2567562; Tel: +91-278-2567760
bAcademy of Scientific & Innovative Research, Anusandhan Bhavan, 2 Rafi Marg, New Delhi-110001, India

Received 14th May 2015 , Accepted 1st July 2015

First published on 2nd July 2015


Abstract

A diverse array of functionally modified seaweed polysaccharide derivatives were prepared, which would be described in this account principally based on the reports published by us during the last decade. The modification reactions involved esterification, –C–N– bond formation and amidation reactions engaging the C-6 carbon of one of the repeating pyranose moieties of the polysaccharides of seaweed species growing in Indian waters, occasionally employing grafting and crosslinking reactions. The new functional properties that were imparted on the modified polysaccharides as a result, included fluorogenicity, thixotropicity, pH-responsiveness and gelling/swelling/metal ion absorbing properties. Of these, some properties were targeted, some were obtained fortuitously, and the latter included thixotropicity and photosensitizer activity. This article showcases various polysaccharide based new materials and the value added seaweed biomass, presenting potential opportunities in this area of research.


image file: c5ra09027j-p1.tif

A. K. Siddhanta

A. K. Siddhanta obtained his BSc, MSc and PhD (1981) degrees in Chemistry from Calcutta University, India. He was postdoctoral fellow at Glasgow University, UK (1980–1983), University of Texas at Dallas (UT Health Science Centre at Dallas) and Austin (1983–1985). He returned to India, and joined CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute at Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India, in 1986. He superannuated as Senior Principal Scientist in March 2014. Presently, he is an Emeritus Scientist (CSIR) and Professor (AcSIR, India) in the same institute. His research interests include natural products chemistry, bioactive compounds, gels, polymers, seaweed polysaccharides and their value addition.

image file: c5ra09027j-p2.tif

Naresh D. Sanandiya

Naresh D. Sanandiya received his PhD degree in chemistry (2014) from M. K. Bhavnagar University, Bhavnagar, India. The PhD research work was carried out in CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar in polysaccharide chemistry under the supervision of Prof. A. K. Siddhanta. Naresh is currently a postdoctoral research associate at Pohang University of Science and Technology, South Korea. His research interests focus on functionalization of polysaccharides, studies of material properties and synthesis of biomimetic materials for bioengineering and environmental applications.

image file: c5ra09027j-p3.tif

Dharmesh R. Chejara

Dharmesh R. Chejara received his MSc degree in chemistry (2008) from South Gujarat University, Surat, Gujarat, India. He obtained his PhD degree (2014) from the Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), New Delhi. The research work was carried out at CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar, under the guidance of Prof. A. K. Siddhanta. Since July 2014 he has been working as a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. His postdoctoral research is on the development of natural polymer based materials and the application thereof in drug delivery systems.

image file: c5ra09027j-p4.tif

Stalin Kondaveeti

Stalin Kondaveeti was born in Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. He obtained his MSc degree in Chemistry (2008) from N.E.S. Science College, Nanded, Maharashtra. He received his PhD degree (2014) from M. K. Bhavnagar University, Bhavnagar. The PhD research work was done in CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar under the supervision of Prof. A. K. Siddhanta. Currently, Stalin is doing postdoctoral research with Prof. Denise in Sao Paulo University, Brazil. His research interests include development of polymeric nanomagnetic biomaterials, hybrid nanocomposites, and their applications in controlled drug release, cells uptake and gene delivery.


1. Introduction

Polysaccharides have polymeric carbohydrate structures, consisting of repeating units (either mono- or di-saccharides) joined together by glycosidic bonds and they are the oldest biopolymers present on earth. The basic function of polysaccharides in living systems is energy storage, besides providing structural strength. In seaweeds, polysaccharides prevent desiccation during their exposure at low tides. The structure of polysaccharides is often linear, but it may contain various degrees of branching. Most of the polysaccharides with some exceptions are soluble in water. After many years of oblivion, the area of polysaccharide chemistry is presently receiving renewed attention. This is mostly due to the increase in the understanding of the role of these polymers in various biological processes.

The majority of the polysaccharides have plenty of hydroxyl and/or carboxyl groups. The presence of these important functional groups made them amenable to chemical derivatization (cf. Fig. 1), resulting in derivatives with functional properties, which were different than those of the parent ones. Active research activities on the modification of polysaccharides are under way in various labs to explore the possibilities of their newer applications in fields such as in biomedical,1–4 biochemical,5–7 physicochemical8 as well as in industrial applications.9,10 It has been demonstrated by researchers including us that derivatization of the gelling seaweed polysaccharides agar/agarose based materials results in new properties e.g. pH-stability and/or pH-responsive,11–13 fluorogenic,14–18 self-assembled nano-material,19 sweetening,20 and controlled-release15 properties. On the other hand, alginate derived materials exhibited the following properties: thixotropic,21 fluorogenic,22,23 metal ion scavenging,23,24 sprayable soft gel,25 controlled-release,26 porous-catalytic,27 properties. Further, carrageenan based new materials exhibited fluorogenic, gelling,28 as well as absorbent29,30 properties.


image file: c5ra09027j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Modification reaction of polysaccharides e.g. alginate, agarose, carrageenan and cellulose.

In an article the work on alginate derivatization, their properties and applications have been eminently reviewed by Pawar et al., (2012).31 Singh et al. (2009) reviewed modification of polysaccharides and other polymeric compounds through different reactions including grafting reactions, which led to improved functions e.g. flocculating properties.32 Mergy et al., (2012), described modification of several ene-functional charged and neutral polysaccharides, i.e., hyaluronic acid and dextran, by esterification reaction of the hydroxyl groups, which led to the synthesis of several functional biomaterials.33 Recently, Cumpstey (2013) has summarized modification of polysaccharide structures by various reactions.34 Kristi L. Kiick and co-workers have reported preparation of polysaccharides based new materials mainly by hybridization with synthetic polymers.35,36 Polysaccharides with tailored nanostructures for biomedical applications have also been reported by Boddohi et al., (2009).37 Terrestrial plant polysaccharides as well as the marine derived ones have been chemically modified for biomedical applications.38 Singh et al., (2010) have reported grafting of polysaccharides and applications of these new materials.39 Potential uses of novel modified seaweed polysaccharides have been studied as flocculating40 and antiviral agents.41 Chemical modification of alginate by free-radical graft copolymerization has been reviewed.42 Microwave-assisted alkaline modification of seaweed galactans has also been reported.43 Esterification of various polysaccharides including seaweed polysaccharides has been reviewed by Heinze et al., (2006)44 and Campo et al., (2010) have reviewed biological properties, chemical modifications and structural characterization of carrageenan.45 Another review article describes properties and application of seaweed polysaccharides e.g. agar/agarose, alginate and carrageenan.46

Unlike the terrestrial plant derived polysaccharides, the seaweed derived polysaccharides such as, agar and carrageenans are acid sensitive polymers and alginate on the other hand is stable in acid and alkali. The real challenge in the modification of these polymers lies in the fact that they enhance solution stability in a wide range of pH, modify gelling behavior, crystallinity and chiral disposition, which would make them amenable to diverse new applications.

Agarose is extracted from red seaweeds and it is widely used as gelling agent in biomedical and bioengineering applications. The basic disaccharide repeating units of agarose consist of (1,3) linked β-D-galactose and (1,4) linked α-L-3,6-anhydrogalactose. Alginic acid is the major structural polysaccharide of brown algae belonging to the family Phaeophyceae. It is a linear block copolymer of two monomeric units, namely β-D-mannopyranosyl and α-L-glucopyranosyl units. These monomers occur in three types of blocks one contains mostly mannuronic acid (M), or guluronic acid (G) and the third has an intermediate composition (MG). Carrageenans represent yet another prominent class of gelling polysaccharide obtainable from red seaweeds. Major carrageenans are termed ι-, κ-, λ-carrageenans. Structurally, these carrageenans are consisted of sequences of: D-galactose-4-sulphate and 3,6-anhydro-D-galactose-2-sulphate (ι-carrageenan), D-galactose-4-sulphate and 3,6-anhydro-D-galactose (κ-carrageenan), D-galactose-2-sulphate and D-galactose-2,6-disulphate (λ-carrageenan). Iota-, κ-carrageenans form stable gels in presence of metal ions e.g. potassium and calcium ions, whereas λ-carrageenan does not gel at all.

We have been successful to prepare a polysaccharide based material with thixotropic properties.25 Such targeted attempts in our laboratory have been rewarded, e.g. introduction of amino groups on the polysaccharide backbone, some of which were subsequently cross-linked to afford new materials.14,22,23 The studies described in this account primarily encompass commercially important seaweed polysaccharides as well as cellulose, which were used in the derivatization protocol (Fig. 1). Polysaccharide derivatives were prepared employing substrates say, hydrophobic, hydrophilic, aliphatic and aromatic compounds. The following advantages of these natural polymers under consideration basically motivated this work: (a) the resources are abundantly naturally occurring renewable biomass and are relatively cheaper; (b) their processing is fairly easy; (c) most of them are soluble in water. In the backdrop of the relevant body of works that has been done by other research groups in the realm of functional modification of seaweed polysaccharides, we present herein a perspective on our work in this area, which were carried out during the last decade, leading to value addition of seaweed bioresource.

2. Methodology

The seaweed polysaccharides agarose/agar, kappa-carrageenan and alginate were used for modification reactions. These polysaccharides, alginate (Sargassum tenerrimum), agarose (Gracilaria dura), carrageenan (Kappaphycus alvarezii) and agar (Gelidiella acerosa and Gracilaria sp.) were extracted from the seaweeds occurring in Indian waters, mentioned in the brackets, in our laboratory as reported earlier.47,48 The chemical modification work principally involved esterification, amide formation and C–N bond formation. Besides these, cross-linking reactions were employed using the natural cross-linker genipin involving suitable substrates such as various diamines. Chemical reactions for synthesizing the modified polysaccharides derivatives have been presented in Tables 1–4. The products were subsequently characterized employing various analytical methods e.g., Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), UV-vis spectrophotometry, inductively coupled plasma spectrophotometry (ICP), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), rheometry, fluorometry, circular dichroism-optical rotatory dispersion (CD-ORD) studies.
Table 1 Derivatization of agarose via –C–N bond formation and amination reactions
image file: c5ra09027j-u1.tif


Table 2 Derivatization of agarose via esterification and amidation reactions
image file: c5ra09027j-u2.tif


Table 3 Derivatization of alginate/alginic acid via amidation and esterification reactions
image file: c5ra09027j-u3.tif


Table 4 Graft copolymerization of κ-carrageenan with vinyl pyrrolidone and methyl methacrylate
image file: c5ra09027j-u4.tif


3. Discussion

The R&D works of this account can be divided in two parts: (a) chemical bioprospecting of Indian seaweeds and (b) modification of polysaccharides.

In the process of chemical investigation of seaweeds followed by modification of polysaccharides, several materials with new functions were synthesized by us (cf. Fig. 1). One of the prominent outcomes of this work was identification of a little-known Indian seaweed species – Gracilaria dura, which produced superior quality agarose with excellent properties [low sulphate (ca. 0.2% w/w) and high gel strength of 2200 g cm−2 (1% gel, w/v) comparable to those available in the market, in a method using non-ionic surfactant induced freeze–thaw modification process.48 Another significant spin-off was identification of an Indian seaweed species, Sarconema scinaioides, a source of commercially important iota-carrageenan.47

Agarose or agar is as such an excellent gelling agent by itself – in water at a concentration of ca. 1% w/w, it forms strong gel. Aqueous solution of kappa-carrageenan (1% w/w) forms strong gel in presence of KCl or CaCl2. Aqueous solution of sodium alginate forms viscous material, but in presence of CaCl2 it forms strong gel. All these gelling seaweed polysaccharides were chemically modified using several substrates, which resulted in new functional properties e.g. fluorogenic, swelling and metal ion scavenging properties, to name a few (Tables 1–4).

3.1 Fluorogenic

Agarose, carrageenan and alginate were modified to produce fluorogenic derivatives in a facile microwave induced method, which would be of potential utility in biomedical and pharmaceutical applications as sensors and radical scavengers.

Agarose was modified using the nucleobases guanine, adenine and cytosine in a microwave mediated facile method. The new agarose derivatives exhibited significantly enhanced fluorescence intensities e.g. 85%, 30% and 143% enhancements respectively at a 5 × 10−5 M concentration, with regard to those of the pure nucleobases at a molar equivalent concentration that was present in the modified agarose solution. Similarly, kappa-carrageenan was modified with adenine and cytosine exhibiting 40% and 81% fluorescence enhancements respectively. These derivatives would be of potential utility in sensory applications (Fig. 2).16–18


image file: c5ra09027j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Fluorescence emissions of (a) agarose, 5 × 10−5 M; (b) κ-carrageenan, 5 × 10−5M; (c) cytosine, 3.09 × 10−5 M, containing 0.030 mM cytosine; (d) cytosine, 3.5 × 10−5 M, containing 0.035 mM cytosine; (e) cytosine, 5 × 10−5 M, containing 0.048 mM cytosine; (f) agarose-graft-cytosine, 5 × 10−5 M, containing 0.030 mM cytosine; (g) carrageenan-graft-cytosine, 5 × 10−5 M, containing 0.035 mM cytosine [reproduced with permission from Carbohydr. Polym., 87(3), 1971–1979; Elsevier].

Carbodiimide (dicyclohexylcarbodiimide/4-dimethylaminopyridine) chemistry was employed to synthesize a fluorescent 6-O-naphthylacetyl agarose (NA-agarose), which under hydrolytic conditions released the plant growth regulator naphthyl acetic acid (NAA) in a controlled manner. Like in the case of modified agarose derivatives mentioned above, in a solution of NA-agarose derivative (1 × 10−3 M) an 82% enhancement of fluorescence was registered with respect to pure agarose at a specified concentration (0.08 mg), the molar equivalent present in NAA content in 1 × 10−3 M solution. This polymer derivative may find applications as a sustained release plant growth regulator and as sensor.15

A fluorescent agarose-L-tryptophan ester hydrogel was synthesized using carbodiimide chemistry. The hydrogel exhibited enhanced (65%) fluorescence emissions in aqueous solution (λmax 350 nm; 1 × 10−4 M), as opposed that of tryptophan at an equivalent concentration. A genipin crosslinked blue hydrogel was prepared with this ester hydrogel. Both the hydrogels exhibited similar gelling characteristics to agarose and they were stable across a wide range of pH media (pHs 1.2, 7.0 and 12.5) under ambient conditions.49

Amides of alginic acid (ALG) were synthesized using different diamines having varying numbers of carbon atoms and structure – hydrazine (HY), ethylenediamine (EDA), 1,6-hexanediamine (HDA), and 1,4-cyclohexanediamine (CHDA). All these amides underwent cross linking reaction with genipin involving the free pendant –NH2 group of the amides, yielding fluorescent products. It may be noted that the amide ALG–EDA exhibited fluorescence while the other three amides did not. On the other hand all the genipin cross linked products showed significant fluorescence emissions, with ALG–EDA registering a three-fold enhancement in fluorescence intensity. There existed an inverse correlation of fluorescence intensity with the number of carbon atoms (Fig. 3).22


image file: c5ra09027j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Fluorescent properties of amide derivatives of alginic acid (ALG) with hydrazine (HY), etheylenediamine (EDA), hexamethylenediamine (HDA) and cyclohexanediamine (CHDA) and their genipin crosslinked derivatives.

We intended to have a free –NH2 group on to the backbone of agarose polymer, so that it can be functionalized further. In a facile Mitsunobu-inspired method 6-aminoagarose was synthesized for the first time under microwave irradiation. Amino-agarose may be deployed to generate cationic polysaccharide for possible applications as gene/drug delivery vehicles.50,51 6-Aminoagarose was genipin cross linked to produce a blue hydrogel with similar characteristics as those of agarose. This aminoagarose was coupled with the biologically active substrates e.g. picolinic and nicotinic acids to afford corresponding fluorogenic amides. These amides exhibited enhanced (ca. 82% and ca. 90%) fluorescence emissions λmax 430 and 412 nm at 1 × 10−3 M, respectively, compared to those of pure picolinic and nicotinic acids at molar equivalent concentrations (0.2 mg).14

So far it has been observed that in the fluorogenic agarose derivatives the fluorescence emissions are greater than that in the dilute solution (1 × 10−4 M) of modifying pure substrates. Oza et al.,16 evoked that these enhancements were “at least partly due to the participation of fluorescent emissions (λex = 266 nm) of water and highly diluted aqueous media, as described by Pershin (2002)52 and Belovolova et al., (2009)53 present in the polysaccharide–water matrix”.

3.2 Photosensitizer activity

In the backdrop of our work on synthesizing alginic acid amides with aliphatic amines, in a structured approach, it was decided that a series of alginic acid amide derivatives would be synthesized using mono-, di- and trinuclear aromatic amines, and study their properties. Fortuitously, we chanced upon a few thixotropic alginate–phenyl/naphthyl amides, which would be discussed a little later (Fig. 4; Section 3.3).
image file: c5ra09027j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Structure–function relationship of sodium alginate based materials.

The ester and amide derivatives (Alg–Anth) of alginate (Alg) and 9-chloromethyl anthracene and 2-amino anthracene (Anth) respectively, did not exhibit any thixotropy. However, these derivatives showed photosensitizer activity as a “welcome bonus” instead, in presence of an acceptor pyrene in reasonably good efficiencies in transferring energy to the acceptor e.g. 63% with ester and 37% with amide. Hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB) factor (>10.0) of both the derivatives aptly qualified their suitability as solubilizers. These water soluble polysaccharide-based polymers may be used as sensor as well as these would be of potential utility as photosensitizers for reactions of organic compounds in aqueous media.54

3.3 Thixotropy

Thixotropic materials are those which starts to flow under shear by virtue of lesser viscosity than the initial value under zero shear stress. The material would attain the initial viscosity on withdrawal of shear. Different aromatic amides of alginate (Na-Alg) were synthesized. Anthryl amide was not thixotropic but it was photosensitizing, which is discussed above. Mononuclear aromatic amides viz. Na-Alg–aniline amide (liquid) and Na-Alg–p-phenylene diamide (solid) were not thixotropic. The o-amino-benzoic (OABA) and m-amino benzoic (MABA) acid amides of Na-Alg were thixotropic exhibiting 15 and 9 structure recovery cycles in rheometric evaluations, whereas Na-Alg-1-naphthyl amide showed thixotropicity showing 9 structure recovery cycles (Fig. 4 and 5).
image file: c5ra09027j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Thixotropic loops for (a) Na-Alg/OABA for 15 subsequent structure recovery cycles and (b) Na-Alg/MABA for 9 subsequent structure recovery cycles [reproduced with permission from Soft Matter, 2012, 8(6), 1837–1844; The Royal Society of Chemistry].

These amides derived from o-amino-benzoic (OABA) and m-amino benzoic (MABA) acids exhibited adequate viscosity under a shear of ca. 32 mPa s at ca. 800 s−1 for Na-Alg/OABA, which may be suitable in sprayable formulations.21,25 The increase in the apparent viscosities of Na-Alg/OABA (822 ± 5.5 cP) and Na-Alg/MABA (315 ± 5.0 cP) from that of Na-Alg (1% w/v) were attributed “to the formation of the stronger double helical structures through the participation of the –COOH group of OABA and MABA in the formation of hydrogen bonds subsequently increasing the number of junction zones in the gel network systems”.

It prompts one to wonder if is it necessary to have amide functionality along with aromaticity (π-electron pool) in a compound to be thixotropic. Chejara et al., (2013)21 sought to qualify the prerequisites with “the presence of favourable non-bonding or van der Waals' interactions between the amine/amide derivative and water (hydrophilic–lipophilic balance) instead must also be playing a crucial role for the formation of such thixotropic materials”. New functional materials may be designed on the basis of this study for their potential applications as pharmaceuticals, sensors and actuators.

3.4 Absorbent hydrogel, pH-responsiveness and controlled-release properties

A blend of agar/Na-alginate was grafted with polyacrylamide to afford new interpolymeric materials with superior swelling properties. Further polysaccharide adducts (polyuronic acid/chitosan) exhibited superior swelling properties in aqueous media. These new materials would be of potential utility in pH-specific dosage delivery applications.

Meena et al., (2008) reported robust hydrogel formed by a material agar/Na-Alg blend (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]3) grafted with polyacrylamide (PAAm).55 This grafted product showed maximum swelling capacities of 24, 18 and 11 g g−1, while Na-Alg swelled 14, 12 and 8.5 g g−1 in acidic, neutral and alkaline media, respectively. Similarly, using the blend employing polyacrylonitrile (PAN), agar/Na-Alg-graft-PAN synthesized, which exhibited a relatively lower swelling capacity (8.5 g g−1 at pH 1.2).56 Meena et al., (2008), reports that “enhanced swelling capacity of the blend in acidic pH 1.2 was presumably due to the presence of acidic pH stable sodium alginate.55 It may be noted that one of the blend components was acid-labile agar, nonetheless the acid stability of the blend hydrogel product may be attributed to increased entanglements of the macromolecule chains within the blend hydrogel, causing slower diffusion in the aqueous medium”.

Sodium alginate is constituted of polymannuronic acid (PMA) and polyguluronic acid (PGA). These acids were isolated from a sample of sodium alginate of Indian Sargassum seaweed species employing a microwave assisted method and the M/G ratio (0.38) was determined. Chitosan (CH) was used to synthesize super-swellable hydrogel adducts (CH–PMA and CH–PGA) of these polymeric acids in very high yields (95–97%) under microwave irradiation, which showed swelling ratios 2700–3000%. This outlines a superior method to the conventional thermal heating method.57 The swelling behavior was harnessed to demonstrate controlled-release of structurally different drugs e.g., paracetamol (PCT), indomethacin (IND), isoniazid (INH), atenolol (ATN) and pravastatin (PST). The release rate was pH- and structure-dependent. The drugs containing –NHCO– group (PCT, INH and ATN) release rate decreased with increasing pH i.e., highest at pH 1.2 and lowest at pH 7.4. However, the drugs having no –NHCO– group (IND and PST) showed a reversed trend in release rate with pH. Chhatbar et al., (2013) noted that this phenomenon of pH-dependence to have an apparent correlation “with the structural features of the adducts and the drugs containing –NH–CO– groups, manifesting pH-dependent preferential interactions of –NH–CO– groups through intermolecular hydrogen bonding facilitated at a higher pH”.58

3.5 Genipin cross-linking imparts unusual stability to galactans in acidic media

Genipin reacts with compounds containing free –NH2 group and produces blue to deep blue cross-linked products.59 Agar and kappa-carrageenan are extremely acid labile and do not contain any amino group on its backbone. They have been found to contain small amounts of proteins (0.25% and 2.0% respectively), apparently entangled in their polymer chains. On reaction of these polymers with genipin produced blue cross-linked products with remarkable acid stability. That the proteins participated in the genipin cross linking reaction was confirmed by the fact that on removal of proteins from the polysaccharides, genipin reaction did not afford any blue colored cross linked product. Genipin-fixed agarose hydrogel in various pH media (1.2, 7.0 and 12.5) swelled up to 1100–1500 min to achieve an equilibrium (swelling ratio 4000–5000%), when degradation of the polymer ensued.

Similarly, over a period of 1100–1500 min genipin cross linked kappa-carrageenan (kC) hydrogel swelled to produce equilibrium swelling ratios 4500–2400% in acidic, neutral and alkali media. The swollen carrageen hydrogel began to disintegrate beyond the point of equilibrium swelling in acidic medium (pH 1.2). By virtue of this significant stability and swelling capacity of genipin cross linked agarose and kappa-carrageenan based products in pH 1.2, these hydrogels would be of utility in sustained delivery pharmaceutical formulations.60,61

A follow-up of the above work was reported by Meena et al., (2009) wherein genipin cross linked super-swellable hydrogel of agar-carrageenan blend (agar/kC) was described. The hydrogels were distinguished by their remarkable stability in various pH media and Ringer's solution. The swelling ratios were in the range 4500–2200% in different pH media 1.2 to 12.5 up to 20 h. These characteristics predispose this hydrogel for its potential utility in food applications.11

A pendant amino group was introduced on the agarose backbone by modifying it with L-phenylalanine to yield an ester derivative agarose-6-O-L-phenylalanine, which underwent cross linking reaction with genipin. Both the ester and cross linked hydrogels exhibited comparable gelling properties with those of agarose. Phenylalanine containing hydrogels can form hydrophilic interpenetrating network and may be used in biomedical devices e.g. contact lenses, scaffolds as well as in specific targeted delivery applications.12

3.6 Interpolymeric metal ion scavenging materials

Modified polysaccharide amide derivatives were prepared which were fluorogenic, and these would be of potential utility as sensors and for metal ion scavenging from aqueous media offering an opportunity for their applications in the areas of water purification and environmental protection.

A novel rhodamine–alginate polymer-based highly fluorogenic compound was reported, which was immobilized on calcium alginate to generate colorimetric, chemosensor beads. These beads effectively extracted Hg2+ and Cr3+ ions from aqueous media at pH 7.1 (Fig. 6). The beads could be reused to extract the ions for 3 cycles employing KI washes for regeneration purpose.24


image file: c5ra09027j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Schematic representation of the methodologies adopted for synthesis of receptor 1 and the formation of the rhodamine–alginate conjugate Gel Bead 1. R represents rhodamine B; G and M represent α-L-guluronate and β-D-mannuronate respectively [reproduced with permission from Chem. Comm., 2012, 48(11), 1659–1661; The Royal Society of Chemistry].

A new water soluble fluorogenic interpolymeric diamide was synthesized using alginic acid and polyglucuronic acid (PGA) amide of ethylenediamine (EDA), through a monoamide of PGCA and EDA, in greater than 80 wt% yields in each step. TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine-1-oxyl radical) oxidation of cellulose of the halophytic plant Salicornia brachiata62 was used to afford PGA. The monoamide of PGA exhibited 7-fold greater fluorescence emissions than those of the interpolymeric diamide. The monoamide showed superior heavy divalent metal ions (Pb2+ and Hg2+) scavenging properties to those of the diamide, the optimum adsorptions of ions were 398.8 and 282.8 mg g−1, respectively (Sanandiya and Siddhanta, 2013).23

3.7 Miscellaneous properties

3.7.1 Sweet agarose. Sweet agarose was prepared. This was synthesized in situ with agarose and saccharin to produce a water-soluble agarose-saccharate, which was sweeter in 150 ppm solution than sucrose although significantly less sweet than pure sodium saccharate. Agarose-saccharate did not have bitter aftertaste in 675 ppm solutions or in the solid state. Pure sodium saccharate, on the other hand tasted bitter under identical conditions. This sweet agarose would be of potential use as a food additive.20
3.7.2 Sugar reactivity of agar. Sugar reactivity of agar in presence of glucose was reported for the first time by Meena et al., (2006).63 Agars of Indian agarophytes viz. Gelidiella acerosa, Gracilaria edulis, Gracilaria crassa and Gelidium pusillum, collected from the Gulf of Mannar, India, were used in this study. The sugar reactivity was more pronounced in presence of sucrose (ca. 25–45%) than glucose (19–34%) in terms of their increased gel strengths ca. 25–45% with sucrose vs. 19–34% with glucose, respectively. In this study Oxoid agar was used as reference material. This was a classic example of useful spin-offs of the chemical bioprospecting studies that were carried out in our lab on the polysaccharides of Indian seaweeds.63
3.7.3 Hydrophobization of agarose, kappa-carrageenan and a sulphated heteropolysaccharide and adhesive property. Agarose was hydrophobized with fatty acids affording a nano-material. Hydrophobically modified nano-sized particulate esters of agarose and stearic/palmitic acids (Ag-SA and Ag-PA), was achieved employing carbodiimide chemistry. This hydrophobized agarose formed self-assembled nano-sized particles. The aqueous solution of the modified polymer was studied by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy, which showed the presence of 4–5 nm micelles, and 220–250 nm polymeric vesicles. The self-aggregate was spherical in shape (TEM). These new nano-sized agarose based materials may be of potential utility as drug delivery vehicles.19

Recently, we have reported syntheses of agarose half-esters of succinic, phthalic and maleic acids, which formed nano-sized polymer vesicles (32–124 nm) in aqueous solution. “The aqueous solution of sodium salts of these esters exhibited enhanced electrical conductivity (ca. 17.5 mS cm−1 at 40 °C) as compared to those of the parent half-esters (ca. 0.3 mS cm−1 at 40 °C). These new agarose based nano-sized materials may have potential applications in electrochemical devices, sensors and as drug carriers”.64

Besides our recent report on interpolymeric polysaccharide derivatives described in Section 3.6 above, earlier in a bid to have interpolymeric products involving seaweed polysaccharides and synthetic polymers, Prasad et al., (2006)65 reported the syntheses of copolymer hydrogels e.g. agar-graft-PVP and kappa-carrageenan-graft-PVP (PVP = polyvinylpyrrolidone) in a one-pot method. These hydrogels exhibited enhanced water-holding capacity and crystallinity. Similarly, Meena et al., (2006)29 described the syntheses of kappa-carrageenan-graft-PMMA (PMMA = polymethyl methacrylate) and kappa-carrageenan-graft-PAAm (PAAm = polyacrylamide). The latter exhibited superior swelling property and maximum swelling was registered in alkaline pH 12.5 (22 g g−1). This product demonstrated excellent binding properties, which held sheets of papers, polyethylene and pieces of wood. The binding property was comparable with those of Fevicol®, a commercially available adhesive (Pidilite Industries, Mumbai, India). Latterly, we have reported synthesis of a similar adhesive polysaccharide based grafted product wherein the sulphated heteropolysaccharide of the brown seaweed Cystoseira indica was grafted with PVP.66

3.7.4 Agar-surfactant interactions. It has been extensively reported that gelling characteristics of polymers in solutions can be modulated employing surfactants.67 Surfactants have been reported to play an important role in facilitating gelation of associating polymers.68 It was reported that non-ionic surfactants, Triton X-100 and Brij 35, reduced the viscosity of agar extractive obtained from a red seaweed Gelidiella acerosa. Subsequently, we also observed Synperonic® 91/6, a polyoxyethylene (6) C9–C11 synthetic alcohol ethoxylate and Triton X-100 (octyl phenol ethoxylate), which are non-ionic in nature, precipitated agarose from the aqueous extractive of the seaweed Gracilaria dura. Repeated water and alcohol washes removed adhering surfactant from the agarose polymer.69 Subsequently, development of a new process for agarose extraction from red seaweed was reported by Meena et al., (2014),48 which did away with the use of conventional energy-intensive freeze–thaw method. In this energy-efficient process the seaweed extractive is treated with a non-ionic surfactant Triton X-100 under stirring at ambient conditions. Agarose got precipitated in an easily dispersible finely granular form, which was isolated by filtration. This agarose was benchmarked with commercially available products (Sigma and Merck), which was found to be exhibiting comparable performance to that of the commercial agarose.48 This process was found to be suitable to only those agar polysaccharides containing very low sulphate (<0.2%).

In another study, Singh et al., (2007)70 reported the process of complex formation, and phase separation in gelatin–agar aqueous solutions. Coacervation of agar, an anionic polysaccharide, ensued via associative complexation up on mixing with gelatins (type-A and B; a polyampholyte) in aqueous solution employing an acid–base tritrimetric method. This was noted that “electrostatic and patch-binding interactions” led to the formation of coacervates.

3.7.5 Porous material and catalytic activity. Modification of alginic acid was reported using ortho-tolidine, a water soluble alginic acid–biphenyl, forming an amide conjugate under microwave irradiation at pH 4.0. A significant change in the optical rotation values of alginic acid (−30.82°) and the conjugate (+39.48°) confirmed that a significant chiroptical makeover had taken place. The conjugate had a porous structure and the porosity values decreased from 0.85 (parent alginic acid) to 0.67 (the amide conjugate). Alginic acid/o-tolidine conjugate (pKb ca. 11.0) was used as a catalyst for direct asymmetric nitroaldol reaction (Henry reaction) of nitromethane with benzaldehyde yielding ca. 85% aldol product.27 This amide conjugate provides an important clue for further investigation for developing organo-catalysts for synthetic purposes.

4. Outcomes

A summary of the various methods of functional modification of polysaccharides and the new effects generated has been presented in Table 5. The following are the important outcomes of the studies reviewed herein.
Table 5 Polysaccharide derivatives with new functionsa
Entry effect/properties Remarks References
a Note: PMMA = poly methyl methacrylate; PVP = polyvinyl pyrrolidone; PAAm = polyacrylamide; NAA = naphthylacetic acid.
Agarose hydrogel – effect of surfactant Led to the development of a new process of agarose extraction 48,69 and 70
Agar-sugar reactivity Enhancement of gel strength with sugar 63
Hydrophobization-enhanced crystallinity > orderliness > superior absorbent Copolymer hydrogels: carrageenan–PMMA; agar–PVP & carrageenan–PVP 28 and 65
Hydrophobization – nano-size self-assembly Agarose-fatty acid esters; and electrically conductive agarose-half-esters 19 and 64
Adhesive and absorbent hydrogel κ-Carrageenan-graft-PAAm; and PVP-grafted sulphated polysaccharide of Cystoseira indica 29 and 66
Swelling hydrogels Genipin cross-linked hydrogel 11, 12, 60 and 61
Absorbent hydrogel – pH-responsive Superior absorbent properties in acidic pH 1.2 11, 55, 56 and 57
Fluorogenic polysaccharides Significantly enhanced fluorescence in the derivatives-agarose: nitrogenous substrates compared to the substrate alone 16, 17, 18, 22 and 49
Fluorogenic – slow release Agarose–naphthyl acetyl – slow release of NAA on hydrolysis; agarose–pyridine carboxylic acids 14, 15 and 58
Fluorogenic interpolymer – metal ion scavenger Scavenging of Hg(II) & Cr(III) by alginate–rhodamine complex; and Pb(II) & Hg(II) by an alginate–cellulose interpolymer 23 and 24
Photosensitizer Sodium alginate–anthracene derivative 54
Thixotropic Thixotropic alginate-aromatics adducts 21 and 25
Sweet agarose Agarose-saccharate derivative – maybe an alternative sweetener 20


(a) The C-6 position of the pyranose moiety of the repeating units of polysaccharides is well disposed to access for modification reactions.

(b) Choice of substrates for tagging them on to the polysaccharide backbone is important for onward modification opportunities. For example, alginate based new porous material and a thixotropic amide were serendipitously engineered.

(c) Direct insertion of –NH2 group onto the C-6 carbon would be extremely useful to a host of predictable consequences in generating new materials. Methylene(s) can be a useful group to serve as a spacer between the C-6 carbon and the –NH2 group for modulating functional properties e.g. fluorescence. Likewise, introduction of –SH– or –S– onto the polysaccharide structure would be of great value considering their biological significance.33

(d) Above all, these polysaccharide based materials would move the seaweed bioresources up the value chain (Table 5).

5. Future prospects

Some known methods reported in the literature were adapted to modify seaweed polysaccharides for bringing about new functional properties, which have been described in this account. Looking ahead, in the endeavor of striving towards materials security, efforts may be focused to look for new materials with a range of novel functions to contain the future demands of various dimensions. Several strategies can be employed to achieve this goal. There may be targeted strategies to engineer materials with desired functions, while on the other hand a considered approach may lead to serendipitous results of utility. These are likely to produce materials with various new properties and attributes, as described in this account for example, thixotropic, fluorescent, porous and photosensitizing materials.

A careful projection tells one that cross-linking reactions as well as inter-polymeric products would possibly be attractive choices with numerous possibilities. Seaweeds as sources of polysaccharides can play a significant role in this endeavor. In emerging economies like the one of India's, this work is expected to bring about a change in the scenario of seaweed based industries creating renewed employment opportunities in the country's coastal districts for the fisher folk who would participate in the large-scale mariculture activities for producing value added seaweed biomass. The latter would subsequently kick-start conventional allied chemical processing industries.

Acknowledgements

CSIR-CSMCRI manuscript number 084/2014. Most of the results described herein have their foundation in the PhD theses of the students of AKS. Authors express their sincere gratitude to those PhD students. AKS thanks Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for funding support under CSIR Emeritus Scientist Scheme. Grateful thanks are also accorded to CSIR, Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), Department of Science and Technology (DST) and Department of Biotechnology (DBT), New Delhi, for generously funding various projects under which the research works were carried out over the years.

References

  1. D. Haydee, T. C. Modesto and C. Soma, in Biomaterials, American Chemical Society, 2010, vol. 1054, ch. 6, pp. 125–135 Search PubMed.
  2. N. Jin, E. A. Morin, D. M. Henn, Y. Cao, J. W. Woodcock, S. Tang, W. He and B. Zhao, Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14, 2713–2723 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. E. G. Popa, M. E. Gomes and R. L. Reis, Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12, 3952–3961 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. G.-M. Qiu, Y.-Y. Xu, B.-K. Zhu and G.-L. Qiu, Biomacromolecules, 2005, 6, 1041–1047 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. K. Abu-Rabeah, B. Polyak, R. E. Ionescu, S. Cosnier and R. S. Marks, Biomacromolecules, 2005, 6, 3313–3318 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. S. Roy and A. Banerjee, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 5300–5308 RSC.
  7. Z. Wu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2008, 110, 777–783 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. A. Schulz, S. Hornig, T. Liebert, E. Birckner, T. Heinze and G. J. Mohr, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 1884–1889 CAS.
  9. S. Park, I. Nam, G.-P. Kim, J. W. Han and J. Yi, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5, 9908–9912 CAS.
  10. M. Tian, J. Wang, E. Zhang, J. Li, C. Duan and F. Yao, Langmuir, 2013, 29, 8076–8085 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. R. Meena, K. Prasad and A. K. Siddhanta, Food Hydrocolloids, 2009, 23, 497–509 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. G. K. Mehta, S. Kondaveeti and A. K. Siddhanta, Polym. Chem., 2011, 2, 2334–2340 RSC.
  13. V. Zamora-Mora, D. Velasco, R. Hernández, C. Mijangos and E. Kumacheva, Carbohydr. Polym., 2014, 111, 348–355 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. S. Kondaveeti, G. K. Mehta and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Polym., 2014, 106, 365–373 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. S. Kondaveeti, D. R. Chejara and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Polym., 2013, 98, 589–595 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. M. D. Oza, R. Meena and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Polym., 2012, 87, 1971–1979 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. M. D. Oza, K. Prasad and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Res., 2012, 357, 23–31 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. M. D. Oza, R. Meena, K. Prasad, P. Paul and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Polym., 2010, 81, 878–884 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. S. Kondaveeti, D. R. Chejara and A. K. Siddhanta, Indian J. Chem., Sect. A: Inorg., Bio-inorg., Phys., Theor. Anal. Chem., 2014, 53, 679–687 Search PubMed.
  20. M. U. Chhatbar, C. B. Godiya and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Polym., 2012, 88, 1118–1123 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. D. R. Chejara, S. Kondaveeti, K. Prasad and A. K. Siddhanta, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 15744–15751 RSC.
  22. M. U. Chhatbar, R. Meena, K. Prasad, D. R. Chejara and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Res., 2011, 346, 527–533 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. N. D. Sanandiya and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Res., 2013, 381, 93–100 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. S. Saha, M. U. Chhatbar, P. Mahato, L. Praveen, A. K. Siddhanta and A. Das, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 1659–1661 RSC.
  25. M. U. Chhatbar, K. Prasad, D. R. Chejara and A. K. Siddhanta, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 1837–1844 RSC.
  26. M. A. Abd El-Ghaffar, M. S. Hashem, M. K. El-Awady and A. M. Rabie, Carbohydr. Polym., 2012, 89, 667–675 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. A. K. Siddhanta, R. Meena, G. Prasad, M. U. Chhatbar, G. K. Mehta, M. D. Oza, S. Kumar and K. Prasad, in Carbohydrate Polymers: Development, Properties and Applications, ed. I. Ryouichi and M. Youta, NOVA Science Publishers Inc., New York, 2010, pp. 555–582 Search PubMed.
  28. K. Prasad, G. Mehta, R. Meena and A. K. Siddhanta, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2006, 102, 3654–3663 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. R. Meena, K. Prasad, G. Mehta and A. K. Siddhanta, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2006, 102, 5144–5152 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. H. Salimi, A. Pourjavadi, F. Seidi, P. E. Jahromi and R. Soleyman, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2010, 117, 3228–3238 CAS.
  31. S. N. Pawar and K. J. Edgar, Biomaterials, 2012, 33, 3279–3305 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. R. P. Singh, S. Pal, S. Krishnamoorthy, P. Adhikary and S. A. Ali, Pure Appl. Chem., 2009, 81, 525–547 CrossRef CAS.
  33. J. Mergy, A. Fournier, E. Hachet and R. Auzély-Velty, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2012, 50, 4019–4028 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. I. Cumpstey, ISRN Org. Chem., 2013, 417672 Search PubMed.
  35. A. D. Baldwin and K. L. Kiick, Pept. Sci., 2010, 94, 128–140 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. S. H. Kim and K. L. Kiick, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2010, 31, 1231–1240 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. S. Boddohi, S. Yonemura and M. J. Kipper, Polym. Prepr., 2009, 50–51 Search PubMed.
  38. G. D'Ayala, M. Malinconico and P. Laurienzo, Molecules, 2008, 13, 2069–2106 CrossRef PubMed.
  39. V. Singh and S. Maurya, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2010, 47, 348–355 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  40. H. J. Prado, M. C. Matulewicz, P. R. Bonelli and A. L. Cukierman, Desalination, 2011, 281, 100–104 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. M. Witvrouw and E. De Clercq, Gen. Pharmacol. Vasc. Syst., 1997, 29, 497–511 CrossRef CAS.
  42. A. Salisu, A. A. Naim and M. M. Sanagi, IOSR J. Appl. Chem., 2013, 4, 39–44 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. D. A. Navarro and C. A. Stortz, Carbohydr. Polym., 2005, 62, 187–191 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. T. Heinze, T. Liebert and A. Koschella, Esterification of Polysaccharides, Springer, 2006 Search PubMed.
  45. V. L. Campo, D. F. Kawano, D. B. d. Silva Jr and I. Carvalho, Carbohydr. Polym., 2009, 77, 167–180 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  46. M. Rinaudo, Polym. Int., 2008, 57, 397–430 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  47. S. Kumar, C. B. Godiya and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Polym., 2012, 87, 1657–1662 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  48. R. Meena, J. P. Chaudhary, P. K. Agarwal, P. Maiti, S. Chatterjee, H. D. Raval, P. Agarwal, A. K. Siddhanta, K. Prasad and P. K. Ghosh, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 28093–28098 RSC.
  49. S. Kondaveeti, K. Prasad and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Polym., 2013, 97, 165–171 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  50. I. Yudovin-Farber, C. Yanay, T. Azzam, M. Linial and A. J. Domb, Bioconjugate Chem., 2005, 16, 1196–1203 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  51. S. K. Samal, M. Dash, S. van Vlierberghe, D. L. Kaplan, E. Chiellini, C. van Blitterswijk, L. Moroni and P. Dubruel, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 7147–7194 RSC.
  52. S. M. Pershin, Physics of Vibrations, 2001, 9, 218–223 Search PubMed.
  53. L. V. Belovolova, M. V. Glushkov, E. A. Vinogradov, V. A. Babintsev and V. I. Golovanov, Phys. Wave Phenom., 2009, 17, 21–31 CrossRef.
  54. D. Chejara, S. Kondaveeti and A. K. Siddhanta, Polym. Bull., 2015, 72, 35–48 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  55. R. Meena, M. Chhatbar, K. Prasad and A. K. Siddhanta, Polym. Int., 2008, 57, 329–336 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  56. M. U. Chhatbar, R. Meena, K. Prasad and A. K. Siddhanta, Indian J. Chem., Sect. A: Inorg., Bio-inorg., Phys., Theor. Anal. Chem., 2009, 48, 1085–1090 Search PubMed.
  57. R. Meena, M. U. Chhatbar, K. Prasad and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Polym., 2011, 83, 1402–1407 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  58. M. U. Chhatbar, C. B. Godiya, R. Meena and A. K. Siddhanta, Indian J. Chem., Sect. A: Inorg., Bio-inorg., Phys., Theor. Anal. Chem., 2013, 52, 1269–1274 Search PubMed.
  59. T. H. Tsm, J. Westly, T. F. Lee and C. F. Chen, J. Liq. Chromatogr., 1994, 17, 2199–2205 CrossRef PubMed.
  60. R. Meena, K. Prasad and A. K. Siddhanta, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2007, 104, 290–296 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  61. R. Meena, K. Prasad and A. K. Siddhanta, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2007, 41, 94–101 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  62. N. D. Sanandiya and A. K. Siddhanta, Carbohydr. Polym., 2014, 112, 300–307 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  63. R. Meena, K. Prasad and A. K. Siddhanta, Food Hydrocolloids, 2006, 20, 1206–1215 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  64. S. Kondaveeti, N. A. Chudasama, J. P. Chaudhary, R. Meena and A. K. Siddhanta, Indian J. Chem., Sect. A: Inorg., Bio-inorg., Phys., Theor. Anal. Chem., 2015, 54, 734–743 Search PubMed.
  65. K. Prasad, R. Meena and A. K. Siddhanta, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2006, 101, 161–166 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  66. M. U. Chhatbar and A. K. Siddhanta, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2015, 132, 42383 CrossRef PubMed.
  67. G. Ermeneko, E. Theunissen, K. Mortensel and H. Reynaers, Polymer, 2001, 42, 2907–2913 CrossRef.
  68. P. P. Kundu and M. Kundu, Polymer, 2001, 42, 2015–2020 CrossRef CAS.
  69. K. Prasad, A. K. Siddhanta, A. K. Rakshit, A. Bhattacharya and P. K. Ghosh, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2005, 35, 135–144 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  70. S. S. Singh, A. K. Siddhanta, R. Meena, K. Prasad, S. Bandyopadhyay and H. B. Bohidar, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2007, 41, 185–192 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

This theme was presented in ICS27, January 12–17, 2014, Bangalore, India.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.