A novel morphology development of micro-injection molded isotactic polypropylene

Shiwei Wang*, Zhenwei Wang, Na Zhao, Jing Jiang and Qian Li*
National Center For International Joint Research of Micro-Nano Molding Technology, Zhengzhou University, 450001, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. E-mail: shiweiwang@zzu.edu.cn; qianli@zzu.edu.cn; Fax: +86-0317-67781750; Tel: +86-0317-67781750

Received 18th March 2015 , Accepted 29th April 2015

First published on 1st May 2015


Abstract

A novel stripe morphology was investigated in a micro-injection molded isotactic polypropylene gear. The annealing treatment was performed on the gear tooth under different temperature and time to control its morphology evolution. This work provides a new way to explore the morphology evolution of micro injection molded products.


Micro-injection molding (MIM) technology is expected to show great potential in the reliable and economic mass production of good quality polymer micro structures.1 One of the main challenges associated with MIM is the result of the micro size of the product, which is difficult to see clearly without the aid of microscopic techniques. Fundamentally similar to that of conventional injection molding, the morphology of a MIM polymer also plays an important role in the shape and arrangement of the final products.2 Meanwhile, “Structuring” of the morphology during injection processing leads to different performances.3 Guo and his coworkers studied the morphology evolution of high density polyethylene during MIM using polarization optical microscope. They found the result images of micropart exhibited a similar ‘‘skin–core’’ structure as the macro part, while has a much larger fraction of orientation layer.4 This work provides a good way to relate the morphologies to MIM process, and more detail works should be done, especially what happens to the material in such physical size. The thermal treatment is a way to adjust the morphology of polymer materials,5 especially for the MIM products.6 Recently, the toughness of MIM polymer has been enhanced at least 7 times after being annealed.7 In this work, a novel morphology of MIM iPP gear was observed by polarized light microscopy, and the annealing was applied to control the morphology evolution, also wide angle X-ray diffraction was used to associate the crystalline structure with novel morphology.

A commercial grade iPP, F401, with a melt flow rate of 2.3 g/10 min (ASTM D1238, 230 °C, and 2.16 kg load) supplied by Lanzhou Petroleum Chemical Co, Ltd. (PR China) was used in this work. The test sample is a iPP gear, with a thickness of 450 μm, a gear teeth length of 1000 μm, half gear teeth width of 350 μm, as shown in Fig. 1. It was manufactured by MIM machine (Babyplast 6/10P) at 4 MPa and 200 °C. For annealing experiments, The iPP gears were placed in an oven at temperature ranged from 60 to 160 °C for different time (20, 40, 60, 80, 120 min). A polarized light microscopy (Olympus, BX51) was used to characterize morphology of the gear samples. The wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) was performed on a Bruker NanoStar system. Monochromatized Cukα (λ = 1.54 Å) radiation was used for all experiments. The scanning position was the surface of central part of the gear tooth as shown in Fig. 1(a). The generator settings were at 45 kV and 0.67 mA. The crystallinity of the samples were calculated according to Liu et al.8 The surface images of the etched samples were obtained using a scanning electron microscope (JEOL, JSM-7500F).


image file: c5ra04626b-f1.tif
Fig. 1 PLM (a) and SEM (b) morphology of MIM iPP gear tooth without annealing.

Fig. 1(a) shows the polarized morphology of the central part of MIM iPP gear tooth without annealing. The morphology was taken directly from the gear sample placed on the stage using transmission mode. Clear stripes morphology displays on the Fig. 1(a) from central to the both sides, from surface to central, the width of the strip increased, while the brightness of the strip decreased. This novel stripe morphology has not been reported yet. In order to probe the structure in full, surface morphology was investigated besides only measuring the thick samples with PLM. The surface morphology of the etched gear tooth was detected by SEM and a clear oriented texture appeared as shown in Fig. 1(b).

The annealing treatments were performed on the gear tooth under different temperature and different time. Fig. 2(a) shows gear teeth annealed at 60 °C for 20 minutes. Compared with Fig. 1, the width of stripes in Fig. 2(a) increases, also the shape of the stripes shows some disparity. This phenomenon presents more obvious for the gear teeth annealed at 120 °C for 20 minutes as shown in Fig. 2(b). The number of strips increases significantly, especially in the central of the teeth and results in reducing of the dark stripe. With the increase of the annealing temperature, the width of the fuzzy layer increases, as shown in Fig. 2(c). When the annealing temperature rise to 160 °C, the dark strip becomes even narrow and the width of the fuzzy edges enlarges obviously. Extension of the annealing time shows little affection on the morphology of the teeth, as shown in Fig. 2(d), the same temperature while 100 min longer compared with the sample of Fig. 2(c).


image file: c5ra04626b-f2.tif
Fig. 2 MIM iPP gear tooth annealing for (a) 20 min at 60 °C, (b) 20 min at 120 °C, (c) 20 min at 160 °C and (d) 120 min at 160 °C.

The result shows a brief multi-layer morphology from central to the surface of the MIM sample in Fig. 3(a). The slice with thickness of about 13 μm was taken along a plane parallel to the flow direction from the mid-width region of the gear. The ‘‘skin–core’’ structure of MIM sample is similar to the conventional molding one except for the thickness of oriented shear layer and core layer.9 The moving ability of the molecular chain was increased by the annealing treatment greatly, which made the gradient difference molecular chains interact with each other.10 For a macroscopic view, the width of the dark strip in the center of the teeth decreases. It is well known that iPP is a semi-crystalline material, which contains crystalline and amorphous parts.11 The molecular chains stack into regular lamellar which makes the refraction index anisotropy in the crystalline region, while the refraction index in the amorphous region shows isotropy. The formation mechanism of stripe morphology and its evolution is shown in Fig. 3(b). The region between upper and lower solid line in Fig. 3(b) is marked as crystalline region, which has a depth of h. When the polarized light incidents on the upper surface of the crystalline region, the birefringence appears. So when the two lights intersect on the surface of crystalline region, the interference appears. The equation Δ = ld is used to get the optical path difference, where l stands for the longer distance optical path and d stands for the shorter distance optical path. If Δ is equal to an odd times or an integer multiple of a half wavelength, the cross point of the two lights show dark stripe or light stripe, respectively. Therefore, the novel morphology is attributes to the optical path difference of the polarized light when it incents to the crystalline region. While for the morphology evolution, the change of the crystalline structure plays an important part. The crystalline structure of polymer becomes regular and perfect after annealing,6,7 which in turn improve the refraction index. Similarly, the region between upper and lower dotted line in Fig. 3(b) is marked as the annealed crystalline region with a depth H. Due to the change of width in the crystalline region, the optical path of the incent polarized light changes from d to D, which improves the Δ and changes the optical path difference, and finally results in the increase of stripe number and decrease of the strip width. The crystalline structure variation of the MIM samples were proved by WAXD results in Fig. 4. There are only two peaks locates at 2 theta of 15° and 21° for the sample annealed at 60 °C as shown in Fig. 4(a). With rise of the annealing temperature, two additional peaks appear for the sample annealed at higher temperature and the intensity of the additional peaks rises as shown in Fig. 4(a), as well as the improves of crystallinity in Fig. 4(b). This fact is due to the better crystalline structure induced by the secondary crystallization after annealing, and the optical path difference becomes large and the spacing between stripes becomes narrower when polarized light pass though the changed crystalline region.


image file: c5ra04626b-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Multi-layer morphology of MIM gear annealed at 120 °C for 20 min (a), and schematic diagram of the strip formation (b).

image file: c5ra04626b-f4.tif
Fig. 4 WAXD patterns (a) and crystallinity (b) of MIM iPP gear tooth annealed at different temperature for 20 min.

Conclusions

A novel stripe morphology in MIM iPP gear was investigated in this work, and the number and the width of stripes as well as the crystallinity were changed under various annealing temperature and time. Secondary crystallization was rebuilt, molecular chains rearranged and perfect structure further affect the light path of polarized light. Ultimately, the increasing stripes appeared, as well as the decrease of the strip width in the sample.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the national science fund (no. 11372286), china postdoctoral science foundation (no. 2013M541987) and the key project of science and technology of the education department of Henan province (no. 14A430003) for their financial support of this project. The project also sponsored by the scientific research foundation for the returned overseas Chinese scholars, state education ministry.

Notes and references

  1. G. X. Fei, C. Tuinea-Bobe, D. X. Li, G. Li, B. Whiteside, P. Coates and H. S. Xia, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 24132 RSC.
  2. N. Zhang, S. Y. Choi and M. D. Gilchrist, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2014, 11, 1362 CrossRef PubMed.
  3. K. Wang, F. Chen, Z. M. Li and Q. Fu, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2014, 39, 891 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. C. Guo, F. H. Liu, X. Wu, H. Liu and J. Zhang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2012, 126, 452 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. S. H. Jiang, G. G. Duan, L. L. Chen, X. W. Hu and H. Q. Hou, Mater. Lett., 2015, 140, 12 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. N. Zhang and M. D. Gilchrist, Polym. Eng. Sci., 2014, 6, 1458 Search PubMed.
  7. S. Shi, Y. Pan, B. Lu, G. Zheng, C. Liu and K. Dai, Polymer, 2013, 54, 6843 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. K. J. Liu, M. J. Ren, X. La, J. Zhang, T. Wang and X. W. Zhang, Mater. Lett., 2014, 125, 209 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. F. Liu, C. Guo, X. Wu, X. Qian, H. Liu and J. Zhang, Polym. Adv. Technol., 2012, 23, 686 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. Y. M. Wang, M. Li and C. Y. Shen, Mater. Lett., 2011, 65, 3525 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. F. You, D. R. Wang, X. X. Li, M. J. Liu, G. H. Hu and Z. M. Dang, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 8799 RSC.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.