Development of a pyrene based “turn on” fluorescent chemosensor for Hg2+

Gandhi Sivaraman , Thangaraj Anand and Duraisamy Chellappa *
School of Chemistry, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai-625021, Tamilnadu, India. E-mail: dcmku123@gmail.com

Received 19th June 2012 , Accepted 6th September 2012

First published on 11th September 2012


Abstract

We have designed, synthesized, and evaluated a new pyrene-based “turn on” fluorescent chemosensor which showed remarkable enhanced fluorescence intensity in the presence of Hg2+ ions and a high selectivity towards Hg2+ ions over a wide range of metal ions in aqueous acetonitrile (ACN). The probe shows selectivity and sensitivity with a 12-fold enhancement in fluorescence towards Hg2+. Upon the addition of Hg2+ ions, the probe displayed an apparent color change, which could be observed by the naked eye under a UV lamp. It's in vitro sensitivity to Hg2+ was demonstrated in candida albicans cells with the use of confocal microscopy.


Introduction

The development of artificial receptors for the sensing and recognition of environmentally and biologically important species has been actively investigated in recent years.1 In this regard, chemosensors that can highly sensitively and selectively detect heavy and transition metal ions (HTM) such as Hg2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, and Cu2+ are especially important.2 Mercury is considered as a prevalent toxic metal in the environment because both elemental and ionic mercury can be converted by bacteria in the environment to methyl mercury, which subsequently bio accumulates through the food chain.3 Mercury can accumulate in the human body and affects a wide variety of diseases even in a low concentration, such as digestive, kidney, and especially neurological diseases.4 As a result, developing new and practical multi signaling chemosensors for Hg2+ is still a challenge.5 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard for the maximum allowable level of inorganic mercury in drinking water is 2 ppb.6 Sensors based on metal ion-induced changes in fluorescence appear to be particularly attractive and are one of the first choices because of their simplicity and efficiency in even very low concentrations.7 Thus, designing fluorescent sensors for mercury8 has drawn worldwide attention. Generally, mercury is known to cause fluorescence quenching of fluorophores via the spin–orbit coupling effect.9 Fluorescence quenching is not only disadvantageous for a high signal output upon recognition but also hampers temporal separation of spectrally similar complexes with time-resolved fluorometry.10 However, the sensors that show fluorescence enhancement on binding to the cation of interest are preferred because these allow a lower detection limit and high-speed spatial resolution via microscope imaging.11,12 Turn on fluorescent chemosensors13 for heavy metal ions, particularly for mercury have remained so far limited because these metal ions are known to quench fluorescence14 emission via enhanced spin–orbit coupling,15 energy, or electron transfer. The simplicity, effectiveness and inexpensive nature spurred many to put continuous effort into developing new selective fluorescent sensors for different analytes.16 In particular imine based sensors have drawn attention due to simplicity and sensitivity.17 Most of the studies about fluorescent chemosensors of Hg2+ are based on a fluorescence quenching mechanism,14 only a few reports are present in the literature on fluorescence “turn on” chemosensors for Hg2+.18 Herein we report a new “turn on” selective fluorescent chemosensor.

Results and discussion

Chemosensor PTE-1 was synthesised by a one step condensation of pyrene-1-carboxaldehyde with 2-(methylthio) aniline in 61% yield (Scheme 1). 1H and 13C-NMR spectra and ESI-MS of PTE-1 are given in Fig. S1–S3. The molecular framework was designed as a platform for the construction of efficient ionophores via its thioether S and imino N atom.19 This Schiff base was stable in neutral acetonitrile and water–acetonitrile solution for at least 3 days. The fluorescence emission intensity of the probe PTE-1 is unaffected by pH values between 4.5–12. This observation indicates that the chemosensor PTE-1, which is pH-stable and also organic solvent-stable, may be useful as a potential chemosensor material.

The absorption spectrum of PTE-1 shows the typical pyrene absorption bands at 230(sh), 290, 375 and also a low energy band centred at 404 nm is attributed to the imino bridge. Upon addition of 1–1.2 equiv. of Hg2+ ions to the PTE-1, the most significant changes were broadening of the absorption bands around 350–450 nm observed with hypochromism (Fig. 1). This is also responsible for the change of colour, which is perceptible to the naked eye, from pale yellow to colorless. The absorption spectra with several metal cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Hg2+, Pb2+, and Sn2+) using their chloride salts in H2O–CH3CN (30[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]70,v/v) are shown in Fig. S4.


Synthesis of compounds PTE-1 and PTE-2.
Scheme 1 Synthesis of compounds PTE-1 and PTE-2.

UV–vis spectra of PTE-1 (10 μM) in the presence of Hg2+ ions (1.0 equiv. and 1.2 equiv.) in H2O–CH3CN (30 : 70, v/v).
Fig. 1 UV–vis spectra of PTE-1 (10 μM) in the presence of Hg2+ ions (1.0 equiv. and 1.2 equiv.) in H2O–CH3CN (30[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]70, v/v).

The fluorescence spectra of PTE-1 with several metal cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Hg2+, Pb2+, and Sn2+) using their chloride salts in H2O–CH3CN (30[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]70,v/v) are shown in (Fig. 2). The probe PTE-1 is very weakly fluorescent compared to pyrene, due to the photo induced electron transfer from the imine nitrogen to the pyrene fluorophore and/or C[double bond, length as m-dash]N isomerisation. Both being the primary processes involved in the deactivation of the excited state, which lead to the fluorescence quenching of PTE-1. By virtue of the ligating atoms N and S, PTE-1 readily forms a chelate with the Hg2+ ion thereby both the photo induced electron transfer (PET) and C[double bond, length as m-dash]N isomerisation are inhibited and the fluorescence from the probe is enhanced.


Fluorescence spectra in the presence of different metal chlorides in H2O–CH3CN (30 : 70, v/v). The inset shows the response of the other metal ions with PTE-1. Excitation was performed at 365 nm.
Fig. 2 Fluorescence spectra in the presence of different metal chlorides in H2O–CH3CN (30[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]70, v/v). The inset shows the response of the other metal ions with PTE-1. Excitation was performed at 365 nm.

The fluorescent properties of PTE-1–Hg2+ were surveyed in typical organic solvent systems as well as aqueous solutions. It exhibits weak monomer emission around 390–410 nm with a characteristic, but a very intense emission of pyrene centered at 462 nm. The pyrene excimer region increases as the water content is increased partially in the vicinity of 30% water composition, and then changes were not so significant up to 40% aqueous solution. This observation implies that the complexation of PTE-1 with Hg2+ ions presumably leads to stacking of pyrene moieties from PTE-1 + Hg2+ resulting in the switch of the pyrene monomer emission to an excimer emission in solution state but ESI-MS provides information for 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 complexation. From this we came to understand that there may be a possibility of intermolecular excimer formation.

A 12-fold enhancement of fluorescence was observed upon addition of Hg2+ compared to that of PTE-1 in the H2O–CH3CN mixture. Upon interaction with various metal ions of alkali (Na+, K+), alkaline earth (Ca2+) and transition-metal ions (Mn2+, Fe3+ , Co2+ , Ni2+ , Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, and Sn2+), a much weaker response is observed relative to Hg2+ at the same concentration, and the fluorescence signal of PTE-1–Hg2+ in the presence or absence of these contrast ions also exhibited only a mild difference (Fig. S5).

To test the reversibility of the probe, we added Na2S (0.1 M) to the solution of PTE-1–Hg2+. The addition of 0.52 mL of Na2S could restore the initial value of free probes due to the Kd value of 10−50 for Hg2+ at standard conditions in the form of [HgS2].20,21 Thus the probe could be revived on addition of Hg2+ (Fig. S6).

The titration curves showed a smooth and steady increase until a plateau was reached (15 μM Hg2+) with a 12-fold increase at the plateau (Fig. 3). The chemosensor PTE-1 exhibited a very efficient fluorescent response, and over 70% of the total fluorescent intensity increase was observed with 1 equivalent of Hg2+. The association constant (Ka) of PTE-1 with Hg2+ is 1.02 × 104 M−1 (error < 10%), obtained by a nonlinear curve fitting of the fluorescent titration results.22 Fig. S7, exhibits the dependence of the intensity ratio of emission at 472 nm (Ff/Fi) on Hg2+. This curve served as the calibration curve for detecting Hg2+. The detection limit23 was calculated from titration results and it was found to be 2.2 × 10−8 M.


Fluorescence titration of PTE-1 (1 μM) in the presence of different amounts of Hg2+ in H2O–CH3CN (30 : 70, v/v). Excitation was performed at 365 nm.
Fig. 3 Fluorescence titration of PTE-1 (1 μM) in the presence of different amounts of Hg2+ in H2O–CH3CN (30[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]70, v/v). Excitation was performed at 365 nm.

To understand the binding of Hg2+ with PTE-1 a Job plot was constructed by measuring the fluorescence at different mole fractions of Hg2+. It exhibits a maximum at 0.5 mol fraction of Hg2+ thus indicating formation of a 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 complex between PTE-1 and the Hg2+ ion (Fig. S8). It was further supported by the peak at 655.35 in the ESI-MS spectrum corresponding to a molecular weight of PTE-1 + HgCl2 + CH3OH + H+ (Fig. S9).

To understand the effect of sulfur in PTE-1 the Schiff base PTE-2 was synthesised (Scheme 1) and its fluorescence behaviour was investigated. The PTE-2 shows a very weak fluorescence with the metal ions but the enhancement is not so significant compared to that of PTE-1 with an excitation of 340 nm (Fig. S10). This ascertains that the chelate formation of PTE-1 with Hg2+ plays a crucial role in the fluorescence and sensing of metal ions.

To further understand the absorption and fluorescence behaviour of the probe PTE-1 and PTE-1 + Hg2+ complex, we carried out DFT calculations with the 6-31G basis set using the Gaussian 03 program.24 The dihedral angle −123.685 for C[double bond, length as m-dash]N–C–C reveals the s-trans conformation of PTE-1 whereas that for PTE-1 + Hg2+ is found to be 138.252. The charges on the N atom for PTE-1 and PTE-1 + Hg2+ are found to be −0.430, −0.248 respectively thus revealing a significant reduction in the electron density on the N atom upon coordination of the probe with Hg2+. This may inhibit fluorescence quenching by the photo induced electron transfer from nitrogen to the fluorophore pyrene. From natural bond orbital analysis, it is evident that non-bonding orbitals containing a lone pair of electrons localised on nitrogen are compatible with the HOMO-1 and HOMO respectively of PTE-1 and PTE-1 + Hg2+. The TDDFT calculations focused on oscillator strength indicate three strong transitions for the probe and one strong and two weak transitions for the PTE-1 + Hg2+ complex. The oscillator strengths for the n–π* transition of the probe and its mercury complex are 0.4329, 0.5446 corresponding respectively to the wavelengths 388 and 397.14 nm. As we use excitation source at 340 nm, a n–π* transition is possible for the probe but for the complex it is not viable as a wave length of 397 nm is away from the excitation wave length. From the DFT/TDDFT results we thus concluded that the fluorescence enhancement in the complex is due to the inhibition of photo induced electron transfer (Fig. S11, 12 and Table. S1 and S2).

The sensitivity of probe PTE-1 to Hg2+ was examined in candida albicans cells by using confocal microscopy. The qualitatively in vitro results are exhibited in Fig. 4. After the cells were incubated with 10 μM of PTE-1 for 30 min at 37 °C, no obvious fluorescence could be imaged (Fig. 4a). At the same experimental conditions, strong fluorescence was imaged 10 min after introduction of 10 μM of Hg2+ to the same cells, displaying enhanced blue fluorescence as in Fig. 4b. The cell imaging experiments demonstrate the good cell-membrane permeability of PTE-1 as a probe for imaging Hg2+ within candida albicans cells and no changes in the cell morphology and cell viability (Fig. S13) were observed.


Intracellular Hg2+ imaged in candida albicans cells at 37 °C with the use of confocal microscopy. (a) Candida albicans cells incubated with PTE-1 for 30 min. (b) The candida albicans cells in part a 10 min after being treated with 10 μM of Hg2+. (c) A bright field image of probe treated candida albicans cells.
Fig. 4 Intracellular Hg2+ imaged in candida albicans cells at 37 °C with the use of confocal microscopy. (a) Candida albicans cells incubated with PTE-1 for 30 min. (b) The candida albicans cells in part a 10 min after being treated with 10 μM of Hg2+. (c) A bright field image of probe treated candida albicans cells.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have designed, synthesized, and evaluated a new pyrene based “turn on” fluorescent sensor which showed remarkable enhanced fluorescence intensity in the presence of Hg2+ ions and a high selectivity towards Hg2+ ions over a wide range of metal ions in aqueous acetonitrile. Background metal ions showed only a small interference with the detection of Hg2+ ions, indicating that the receptors could be used as efficient Hg2+ selective “turn on” fluorescent sensors. This significantly enhanced fluorescence is due to the formation of a 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 complex PTE-1–Hg2+ in which the rotation of acyclic C[double bond, length as m-dash]N is frozen. The sensitivity of PTE-1 to Hg2+ was demonstrated in candida albicans cells, indicating its potential application for imaging of Hg2+ in living cells.

Materials and methods

Pyrene-1-carboxaldehyde, 2-(methylthio) aniline and aniline were obtained from Aldrich and used as such. Metal chloride salts were procured from Merck. Absorption spectra were recorded using a JASCO V-530 spectrophotometer while fluorescence analyses were done using a JASCO spectrofluorimeter. The excitation and emission slit widths were kept constant as 5 nm. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker (Avance) 300 MHz NMR instrument. Electrospray ionisation mass spectral (ESI-MS) analysis was performed in the positive ion mode on a liquid chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometer (LCQ Fleet, Thermo Fisher Instruments Limited, US). Microanalysis (C, H, and N) was performed using a Perkin-Elmer 4100 elemental analyzer.

Synthesis of PTE-1

Pyrene-1-carboxaldehyde was mixed with 2-(methylthio) aniline in acetonitrile. The reaction mixture was stirred and refluxed for 3 h in the presence of a drop of acetic acid. The purification of the crude product obtained after distillation of the solvent by column chromatography using hexane/ethyl acetate yields a yellow solid. (61% yield). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 2.56(s, 3H), 7.18–7.29(m, 4H), 8.01–8.17(m, 3H), 8.23–8.26(m, 4H), 8.75(d, 1H), 9.17(d, 1H), 9.40(s, 1H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 14.94, 117.5, 122.9, 124.6–134.3, 150.04, 158.4. MS (ESI): 352.17 (M+H+). Elemental analysis for C24H17NS: calculated: C, 82.02; H, 4.88; N, 3.99 and found: C: 81.94; H, 4.81; N, 3.94.

Synthesis of PTE-2

PTE-2 was synthesised using aniline instead of 2-(methylthio) aniline by adopting same procedure as that of PTE-1. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) 7.33–7.26(m, 1H) 7.40–7.38(m, 2H), 7.51–7.46(m, 2H), 8.27–8.03(m, 7H), 8.77(d, 1H), 9.04(d, 1H), 9.49(s, 1H). MS (ESI): 306.47 (M+H+).

Computational details

We carried out density functional theory (DFT) calculations with the 6-31G* basis set using the Gaussian 03 program in order to understand the turn on fluorescence behaviour of PTE-1 on complexation with Hg2+. Initially the geometries of PTE-1 and the PTE-1 + Hg2+ complex were optimized by DFT-B3LYP using 6-31G and LANL2DZ basis sets respectively. The ground state optimized geometries absorption behaviour and corresponding transitions of PTE-1 and the PTE-1 + Hg2+ complex were obtained from TDDFT using the above basis sets.

In vitro cellular imaging

Candida albicans cells were incubated with the probe PTE-1 (10 μM) in PBS buffer (1% DMSO) for 30 min, then the cells were centrifuged and washed with PBS buffer three times. PTE-1 treated cells were incubated with Hg2+ (10 μM) for 10 min and the cells were imaged using a confocal fluorescence microscope (Zeiss LSM 510 META).

Acknowledgements

G.S. would like to thank UGC for a senior research fellowship. G.S., T.A. and D.C. acknowledge DST-IRHPA, FIST for instrumental facilities.

References

  1. (a) V. Amendola, L. Fabbrizzi, F. Forti and M. Licchelli, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2006, 250, 273 CrossRef CAS; (b) A. Ojida, H. Nonaka, Y. Miyahara, S. Tamaur, K. Sada and I. Hamachi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 5518 CrossRef CAS.
  2. (a) R. Martinez, F. Zapata, A. Caballero, A. Espinosa, A. Tairraga and P. Molina, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 3235 CrossRef CAS; (b) R. R. Avirah, K. Jyothish and D. Ramaiah, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 121 CrossRef CAS; (c) S. Yoon, E. W. Miller, Q. He, P. H. Do and C. J. Chang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 6658 CrossRef CAS; (d) Y. Shiraishi, H. Maehara, K. Ishizumi and T. Hirai, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 3125 CrossRef CAS.
  3. H. H. Harris, I. J. Pickering and G. N. George, Science, 2003, 301, 1203 CrossRef CAS.
  4. M. Harada, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 1995, 25, 1–24 CrossRef CAS.
  5. (a) E. M. Nolan and S. J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 14270 CrossRef CAS; (b) G. Zhang, D. Zhang, S. Yin, X. Yang, Z. Shuai and D. Zhu, Chem. Commun., 2005, 2161 RSC; (c) S. Yoon, A. E. Albers, A. P. Wong and C. J. Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 16030 CrossRef CAS; (d) A. Caballero, R. Martinez, V. Lloveras and J. Veciana, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 15666 CrossRef CAS; (e) D. Y. Sasaki and B. E. Padilla, Chem. Commun., 2005, 1581 Search PubMed; (f) A. Coskun and E. U. Akkaya, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 14474 CrossRef CAS; (g) R. Guliyev, A. Coskun and E. U. Akkaya, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 9000 CrossRef; (h) A. Coskun and E. U. Akkaya, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 607 CrossRef CAS; (i) M. Zhu, M. Yuan, X. Liu and D. Zhu, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 1481 CrossRef CAS.
  6. Mercury Update: Impact on Fish Advisories; EPA Fact Sheet EPA-823-F-01-001; Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water: Washington, DC, 2001.
  7. (a) R. Martínez-Máñez and F. Sancenon, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 4419 CrossRef; (b) J. S. Kim and D. T. Quang, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 3780 CrossRef CAS.
  8. B. Valeur and I. Leray, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2000, 205, 3 CrossRef CAS.
  9. D. S. McClure, J. Chem. Phys., 1952, 20, 682 CrossRef CAS.
  10. K. Rurack, U. Resch-Genger and W. Rettig, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1998, 118, 143 CrossRef CAS.
  11. (a) S. Yoon, A. E. Albers, A. P. Wong and C. J. Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 16030 CrossRef CAS; (b) S. Yoon, A. E. Albers, A. P. Wong and C. J. Chang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 6658 CrossRef CAS.
  12. (a) M. Zhang, M. Yu and C. H. Huang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 10322 CrossRef CAS; (b) E. Sasaki, H. Kojima, H. Nishimatsu, Y. Urano, K. Kikuchi and T. Nagano, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 3684 CrossRef CAS; (c) D. Yang, Z. N. Sun, N. W. Chung and J. G. Shen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 6004 CrossRef CAS; (d) N. C. Lim, H. C. Freake and C. Bruckner, Chem.–Eur. J., 2005, 11, 38 CrossRef; (e) G. Zhang and D. Zhu, Chem. Commun., 2005, 2161 Search PubMed; (f) L. Liu, G. Zhang and D. Zhu, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 4581 CrossRef CAS; (g) C. Wang, G. Zhang and D. Zhu, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 5680 CrossRef CAS.
  13. (a) E. M. Nolan and S. J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 14270 CrossRef CAS; (b) L. Prodi and M. Montali, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 6769 CrossRef CAS; (c) R. Martinez, A. Espinosa, A. Tarraga and P. Molina, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 5869 CrossRef CAS.
  14. (a) A. B. Descalzo, M. M. Ramón and R. Radeglia, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 3418 CrossRef CAS; (b) S. Y. Moon, N. J. Youn and S. M. Park, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 2394 CrossRef CAS.
  15. (a) S. A. Sallam, Transition Met. Chem., 2006, 31, 46 CrossRef CAS; (b) C. Sousa, C. Freire and B. de Castro, Molecules, 2003, 8, 894 CrossRef CAS.
  16. (a) J. S.Wu, W. M.Liu, X. Q. Zhuang and S. T. Lee, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 33 CrossRef; (b) G. Q. Yang, F. Morlet-Savary, Z. K. Peng, S. K. Wu and J. P. Fouassier, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1996, 256, 536 CrossRef CAS; (c) Z. M. Li and S. K. Wu, J. Fluoresc., 1997, 7, 237 CrossRef CAS; (d) P. F. Wang and S. K. Wu, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1995, 86, 109 CrossRef CAS; (e) D. Ray and P. K. Bharadwaj, Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47, 2252 CrossRef CAS; (f) Z. X. Li, M. M. Yu, L. F. Zhang, M. Yu, J. X. Liu, L. H. Wei and H. Y. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7169 RSC; (g) V. Chandrasekhar, P. Bag and M. D. Pandey, Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 9876 CrossRef CAS; (h) J. S. Wu, W. M. Liu, J. C. Ge, H. Y. Zhang and P. F. Wang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 3483 RSC; (i) K. J. Wallace, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2012, 381, 15 CrossRef.
  17. (a) G. Farruggia, S. Iotti, L. Prodi, M. Montalti, N. Zaccheroni, P. B. Savage, V. Trapani, P. Sale and F. I. Wolf, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 344 CrossRef CAS; (b) H. S. Jung, K. KO, S. H. Kim, S. P. Bhuniya, J. Lee, Y. Kim, S. Jin and J. S. Kim, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 8552 CrossRef CAS; (c) Y. Xu, J. Meng, L. Meng, Y. Dong, Y. Cheng and C. Zhu, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 12898 CrossRef CAS; (d) R. Joseph, J. P. Chinta and C. P. Rao, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 3387 CrossRef CAS; (e) A. Sola, F. Otón, A. Espinosa, A. Tárraga and P. Molina, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 12548 RSC; (f) B. Pedras, E. Oliveira, H. Santos, L. Rodriguez, R. Grehuet, T. Avilés, J. L. Capelo and C. Lodeiro, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2009, 362, 2627 CrossRef CAS.
  18. (a) A. K. Mahapatra, J. Roy and P. Sahoo, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 2231 RSC; (b) J. Huang, Y. Xu and X. Qian, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 2167 CrossRef CAS; (c) M. Li, H.-Y. Lu, R.-L. Liu, J.-D. Chen and C.-F. Chen, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 3670 CrossRef CAS; (d) V. Bhalla, M. Kumar, P. R. Sharma and T. Kaur, Inorg. Chem., 2012, 51, 2150 CrossRef CAS; (e) A. Thakur and S. Ghosh, Organometallics, 2012, 31, 819 CrossRef CAS; (f) D. Wua, C. He, X. Hu and C. Duan, Dalton Trans., 2009, 10457 Search PubMed.
  19. (a) M. S. J. Niasari, J. Coord. Chem., 2009, 62, 980 CrossRef; (b) K. Shanker, R. Rohini, V. Ravinder, P. M. Reddy and Y. P. Ho, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2009, 73, 205 CrossRef.
  20. T. Forster and K. Z. Kasper, Electrochemistry, 1955, 59, 976 CAS.
  21. (a) D. M. Findlay and R. A. N. McLean, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1981, 15, 1388 CrossRef CAS; (b) R. D. Armstrong, D. F. Porter and H. R. Thirsk, J. Phys. Chem., 1968, 72, 2300 CrossRef CAS; (c) W. Huang, C. Song, C. He and C. Duan, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 5061 CrossRef CAS.
  22. (a) K. A. Conners, Binding Constants; Wiley: New York, 1987 Search PubMed; (b) B. Valeur, Molecular Fluorescence. Principles and Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2002 Search PubMed.
  23. M. Shortreed, R. Kopelman, M. Kuhn and B. Hoyland, Anal. Chem., 1996, 68, 1414 CrossRef CAS.
  24. Gaussian 03, Revision C.02, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, J. A. Montgomery Jr., T. Vreven, K. N. Kudin, J. C. Burant, J. M. Millam, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G. A. Petersson, H Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J. E. Knox, H. P. Hratchian, J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, P. Y. Ayala, K. Morokuma, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, V. G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A. G. Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, SB. B. tefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, C. Gonzalez and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Computational details, NMR, MS spectra. See DOI: 10.1039/c2ra21202a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.