Ruben P.
van Summeren
a,
Amy
Romaniuk
b,
Edwin G.
IJpeij
a and
Paul L.
Alsters
*a
aDSM Innovative Synthesis B.V., PO Box 18, Geleen, 6160 MD, The Netherlands. E-mail: paul.alsters@dsm.com; Tel: +31 46 4761348
bDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Thomas Graham Building, 295 Cathedral Street, Glasgow, Gl 1XL, UK
First published on 2nd August 2012
An alcohol oxidation method based on the use of pyridine or 3-cyanopyridine as an organocatalyst in combination with trichloroisocyanuric acid as the terminal oxidant is reported. It is demonstrated that secondary aliphatic alcohols can be selectively oxidized to the corresponding ketones in the presence of primary aliphatic alcohols. The method is also suitable for the oxidation of primary and secondary benzylic alcohols. N-Chloropyridinium cyanurates are proposed as the active alcohol-oxidizing species.
In 1992, Hiegel and Nalbandy disclosed a particularly practical method for the conversion of secondary alcohols into ketones.5 Specifically, they demonstrated that a range of secondary alcohols can be oxidized at ambient temperature by treatment with trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA) in acetone in the presence of a slight excess of pyridine as a base (Scheme 1). Furthermore it was shown that primary alcohols are oxidized at a significantly lower rate, allowing for chemoselective oxidations without the need for protecting groups.
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 Secondary alcohol oxidation with trichloroisocyanuric acid in the presence of pyridine.5 |
In principle, the method as described by Hiegel and Nalbandy is an attractive candidate for scale-up. The procedure is operationally simple and the reaction conditions are relatively mild. Moreover, TCCA is readily available, easy to handle, inexpensive and has a high active chlorine content. The only drawback is the use of stoichiometric amounts of pyridine which is a CMR (Carcinogenic/Mutagenic/Reprotoxic) category 3 compound. Consequently, we were interested in further optimization of the reaction conditions including a screening for alternative solvent-base combinations, aiming at reducing the required amount of pyridine. However, it soon became apparent (vide infra) that the role of pyridine in the reaction is much larger than just a scavenger for the hydrochloric acid that is generated during alcohol oxidation and that, in fact, under proper conditions pyridine acts as an organocatalyst for the alcohol oxidation.
General method using stoichiometric pyridine: Method A – the alcohol (2.5 mmol, 1.0 eq.) was dissolved in deuterated acetonitrile (2.5 mL) and stirred under a nitrogen atmosphere. An ambient temperature was maintained by external cooling using a water bath. Subsequently, pyridine (0.25 mL, 3.1 mmol, 1.2 eq.) was added after which a solution of TCCA (0.25 g, 1.1 mmol, 0.43 eq.) in deuterated acetonitrile (2.5 mL) was gradually added over 30 minutes using a syringe pump. The resulting mixture was stirred for the appropriate reaction time at which point neopentyl bromide (0.196 g, 1.30 mmol) was added as an internal standard. A sample was then filtered and analyzed by 1H-NMR.
General method using catalytic pyridine: Method B – sodium bicarbonate (0.25 g, 3.0 mmol, 1.2 eq.) was suspended in DMF and stirred for 30 minutes under a nitrogen atmosphere. An ambient temperature was maintained by external cooling using a water bath. Subsequently, the alcohol (2.5 mmol, 1.0 eq.) and pyridine (30 μL, 0.37 mmol, 15 mol%) were added. Next a solution of TCCA (0.25 g, 1.1 mmol, 0.43 eq.) in DMF (2.5 mL) was gradually added over 30 minutes using a syringe pump. The resulting mixture was stirred for the appropriate reaction time at which point 1,2-dichlorobenzene (0.156 g, 1.06 mmol) was added as an internal standard. A sample was then filtered, diluted with isopropanol and analyzed by GC.
Entry | Solvent | Conv.b | Conv.b | Sel.b |
---|---|---|---|---|
20 min (%) | 120 min (%) | 120 min (%) | ||
a Conditions: menthol (5 mmol), solvent (10 mL), pyridine (5 mmol), TCCA (1.75 mmol), RT. b Conversion and selectivity towards menthone determined by quantitative GC with 1,2-dichlorobenzene as internal standard. c Accurate determination hampered by the presence of undissolved TCCA. | ||||
1 | Acetone | 97 | 97 | >99 |
2 | MTBE | n.d.c | 74 | >99 |
3 | Ethylacetate | 59 | 95 | 94 |
4 | n-Butylacetate | 42 | 78 | 84 |
5 | Dimethylcarbonate | 58 | 87 | >99 |
6 | Dichloromethane | 67 | 79 | >99 |
7 | 1,2-Dichloroethane | n.d.c | 65 | >99 |
8 | Chloroform | n.d.c | 68 | >99 |
9 | Acetonitrile | 98 | 100 | >99 |
Hiegel and Nalbandy reported that the desired alcohol oxidation reaction also occurs under acidic conditions albeit with lower chemoselectivity.6 The primary role of pyridine is therefore to increase selectivity by trapping hydrogen chloride. If this line of reasoning is correct, it should be straightforward to replace pyridine by an alternative base. Hence, a number of organic and inorganic bases were evaluated for this purpose, using the oxidation of menthol as a test reaction (Table 2). Surprisingly, most bases had a negative effect on both the activity and especially the selectivity of the oxidation system as compared to the blanc reaction (entry 1 vs. entries 3–11). It appeared that a.o. triethylamine, imidazole, aniline, DABCO, sodium bicarbonate and N,N-dimethylaniline block (to some extend) successfully the unselective alcohol oxidation reaction that occurs under acidic conditions. However, unlike pyridine, these bases unfortunately do not facilitate an alternative, more selective pathway towards the desired carbonyl compound. Instead, GC-MS analysis indicated that unselective chlorination processes prevented a clean alcohol oxidation. Only cesium carbonate (entry 13) and the pyridine derivative 2,6-lutidine (entry 14) exhibited similar selectivity as pyridine (entry 2), although with significantly lower conversions. Consequently, it should be concluded that in the present context pyridine is a privileged compound whose modus operandi surpasses the simple action of a base.
Entry | Base | Conv.b (%) | Sel.b (%) |
---|---|---|---|
a Conditions: menthol (5 mmol), CH3CN (10 mL), base (5 mmol), TCCA (1.75 mmol), RT, 20 minutes. b Conversion and selectivity towards menthone determined by quantitative GC with 1,2-dichlorobenzene as internal standard. | |||
1 | None | 50 | 81 |
2 | Pyridine | 100 | >99 |
3 | Pyrazine | 70 | 65 |
4 | N,N-Dimethylaminopyridine | 24 | <1 |
5 | Triethylamine | 47 | 2 |
6 | Imidazole | 26 | 1 |
7 | N,N-Dimethylaniline | 17 | 5 |
8 | Aniline | 17 | 0 |
9 | Sodium bicarbonate | 62 | 27 |
10 | 1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) | 26 | 9 |
11 | 2,6-Di-tert-butylpyridine | 95 | 13 |
12 | Potassium acetate | 27 | 86 |
13 | Cesium carbonate | 52 | >99 |
14 | 2,6-Lutidine | 37 | 95 |
When the reaction was performed in the presence of pyridine, it was observed that the initially homogeneous reaction mixture temporarily turned into a white suspension. This suspension subsequently became a clear solution again before cyanuric acid finally precipitated at the end of the reaction. We were intrigued by the nature of the initially formed precipitate and suspected that this was a reactive, poorly soluble intermediate generated from pyridine and TCCA. Upon closer inspection in the absence of substrate, it was indeed found that addition of 3 mol equivalents of pyridine to a CD3CN solution of TCCA (i.e. 1/1 py/Cl molar ratio) at room temperature results in the gradual precipitation of a white, slightly yellowish solid. 1H-NMR analysis in D2O of three batches of this solid, isolated by decantation of the CD3CN supernatant7 and drying of the solid in a stream of N2, showed the characteristic doublet/triplet/triplet pattern with a 2/1/2 integral ratio of a pyridine-type structure, but significantly shifted down-field relative to pyridine itself.8 Although the chemical shifts of these three batches relative to the HDO peak set at 4.70 ppm varied slightly, they were in all cases clearly distinct from those measured in D2O for pyridinium chloride and pyridine N-oxide, these compounds being two other potential solid products generated from pyridine + TCCA.9 The presence of a pyridine-type structure in the precipitate that is distinct from that in pyridinium chloride and pyridine N-oxide was further confirmed by 13C-NMR in D2O.10 We feel the foregoing results are in line with chlorine transfer from TCCA to pyridine, generating poorly soluble tris[N-chloropyridinium] cyanurate (Scheme 2).11,12
![]() | ||
Scheme 2 Formation of tris[N-chloropyridinium] cyanurate by positive chlorine transfer from TCCA to pyridine. |
The results above illustrate that pyridine + TCCA, through the formation of N-chloropyridinium cyanurate species, acts as a unique alcohol oxidation system, with the cyanurate anion acting as a hydroxyl proton acceptor and the N-chloropyridinium cation acting as an α-CH bond hydride abstractor, as depicted in Scheme 3. Such a hydride abstraction mechanism is in line with the fact that secondary alcohols are oxidized faster than primary alcohols (see also entry 2 of Table 4) as it involves a transient positive charge on the carbon atom that is being oxidized. Further (circumstantial) evidence is provided by a direct competition experiment between electron rich ortho-methylbenzylalcohol and electron poor ortho-chlorobenzylalcohol using limiting oxidants. Specifically, it was found that the former substrate is oxidized substantially faster resulting in a mixture of the corresponding aldehydes with a ratio of 88:
12 (data not shown). Mechanistically, the pyridine + TCCA system most likely resembles other reported alcohol oxidation systems based on cationic reagents comprising halogen cations stabilized by neutral organic nitrogen bases.13
![]() | ||
Scheme 3 Proposed alcohol oxidation mechanism based on hydride abstraction by N-chloropyridinium cations. |
In view of the distinctive role of pyridine in the reaction, efforts were shifted from replacing pyridine altogether to reducing the amount of pyridine to catalytic proportions. In particular, it was envisioned that pyridine could operate as an organocatalyst in conjunction with a cheap and non-toxic base that merely acts as a hydrochloric acid scavenger. To this end, a variety of bases were examined in different solvents (Table 3). It was soon established that catalytic pyridine did not have any beneficial effect when combined with potassium acetate, DABCO, triethylamine or cesium carbonate using acetonitrile as the solvent (entries 1–4 in Table 3vs. entries 5, 10, 12 and 13 in Table 2). However, the reaction outcome did substantially improve in the case of sodium bicarbonate. Specifically, the GC-yield increased from 17% to 39% due to both higher conversion as well as enhanced selectivity (entry 6 in Table 3vs. entry 9 in Table 2). At this point, it was reasoned that the availability of dissolved sodium bicarbonate most likely constituted a limiting factor in the reaction. To remove this bottleneck, co-solvents such as methanol, 1,2-dichloroethane and methyl–isobutyl ketone were tested but unfortunately to no avail (data not shown). On the other hand, when the reaction was performed in DMF with slow addition of the oxidant and only 1 eq. NaHCO3, the conversion and selectivity indeed improved to a gratifying 96% and 85% respectively (entry 8). The favorable influence of pyridine under these conditions was clearly established in the control experiment without organocatalyst (entry 9).
Entry | Base | Solvent | Conv.b (%) | Sel.b (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a Conditions: menthol (5 mmol), solvent (10 mL), pyridine (0.5 mmol, 10 mol%), base (1 or 2 eq.), TCCA (1.75 mmol), RT, 2 hours. b Conversion and selectivity towards menthone determined by quantitative GC with 1,2-dichlorobenzene as internal standard. c TCCA in 5 mL DMF dosed over 1 h to 5 mL reaction mixture. d Without pyridine. | ||||
1 | Potassium acetate (2 eq.) | CH3CN | 67 | 9 |
2 | DABCO (1 eq.) | CH3CN | <5 | — |
3 | Triethylamine (1 eq.) | CH3CN | 22 | <5 |
4 | Cesium carbonate (1 eq.) | CH3CN | 60 | 95 |
5 | Sodium carbonate (2 eq.) | CH3CN | <5 | — |
6 | Sodium bicarbonate (2 eq.) | CH3CN | 80 | 49 |
7 | Sodium bicarbonate (1 eq.) | DMF | 86 | 25 |
8c | Sodium bicarbonate (1 eq.) | DMF | 96 | 85 |
9c,d | Sodium bicarbonate (1 eq.) | DMF | 76 | 70 |
With a proof-of-principle for the organocatalytic oxidation of cyclic alcohols in hand, the next step was to determine the substrate scope in comparison to the original procedure using stoichiometric pyridine. As can be seen in Table 4, also linear aliphatic secondary alcohols are cleanly oxidized to the corresponding ketones by both methods (entry 1). It should be noted though that the catalytic protocol is considerably slower resulting in a modest 50% conversion after 24 hours. Furthermore, oxidation of 1,3-butanediol clearly demonstrated that secondary aliphatic alcohol groups are generally favored over primary ones (entry 2).14 In this case, both the activity as well as the selectivity of the procedure with stoichiometric pyridine are superior. In contrast, primary and secondary benzylic alcohols are effectively converted by either protocol to the corresponding aldehyde or ketone, respectively (entries 3 and 4). A competition experiment between benzylalcohol and 1-phenyl ethanol revealed that also for benzylic substrates the secondary alcohol is slightly preferred although the distinction is much less pronounced in this case (factor of only 2). Interestingly, neither method proved useful for the preparation of anisaldehyde (entry 5). Apparently, electron rich benzylic alcohols are unsuitable substrates due to the susceptibility of the aromatic ring towards degradative ring chlorination (GC-MS evidence).15 Electron poor benzylic substrates on the other hand are cleanly oxidized, albeit at a reduced rate leading to several days of reaction time (entries 6 and 7). Overall, it can be concluded that the oxidation protocol with catalytic pyridine follows the same trends as its stoichiometric counterpart but with a somewhat inferior activity/selectivity profile.
Entry | Substrate | Method A (stoichiometric) | Method B (catalytic) |
---|---|---|---|
Time, conv. (%), sel.b (%) | Time, conv. (%), sel.b (%) | ||
a Conditions: Method A: substrate (2.5 mmol), CD3CN (2.5 mL), pyridine (3.1 mmol), TCCA (1.1 mmol) in 2.5 mL CD3CN dosed over 30 min, RT; Method B: substrate (2.5 mmol), DMF (2.5 mL), pyridine (0.38 mmol, 15 mol%), NaHCO3 (3.13 mmol), TCCA (1.05 mmol) in 2.5 mL DMF dosed over 30 min, RT. b Selectivity towards the corresponding ketone or aldehyde. c Determined by quantitative 1H-NMR with neopentyl bromide as internal standard. d Determined by quantitative GC with 1,2-dichlorobenzene as internal standard. e Selectivity towards 4-hydroxy-2-butanone. f DMF-d7 used. g See the text: degradative ring chlorination. | |||
1 |
![]() |
1 hour, 100c, 97c | 24 hours, 50d, >99d |
2 |
![]() |
1 hour, 90c, >95c,e | 6 hours, 54c,f, >95c,e,f |
3 |
![]() |
4 hours, 100d, 96d | 6 hours, 98d, 91d |
4 |
![]() |
4 hours, 97c, 93c | 5.5 hours, 91d, 87d |
5 |
![]() |
4 hours, 55c, 0c,g | 6 hours, 73d, 0d,g |
6 |
![]() |
16 hours, 70c, >99c | 3 days, 70d, >99d |
7 |
![]() |
2 days, 18c, 98c | 2 days, 31d, 92d |
Finally, in an attempt to find an organocatalyst with a better activity–selectivity profile, three alternative pyridine derivatives were briefly assessed in the oxidation of 2-octanol, using conditions as described under Method B in Table 4. It was found that para-methoxy pyridine performed somewhat less than pyridine itself giving the desired ketone with 44% conversion and 90% selectivity after 24 hours. Surprisingly, full conversion was achieved with 4-cyano-pyridine but unfortunately at the cost of a deteriorated selectivity (69%). However, 3-cyano-pyridine displayed a twice as high activity as pyridine while being equally selective, leading to an overall yield of 94% of 2-octanone.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 |