Xiaoying
Liu†
,
Barış
Ünal†
and
Klavs F.
Jensen
*
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. E-mail: fjensen@mit.edu; Fax: +1 617-258-8992
First published on 9th August 2012
Packed-bed microreactors are employed under flow conditions for studies of heterogeneous catalysis: oxidation of 4-isopropylbenzaldehyde and hydrogenation of 2-methylfuran. They have been demonstrated to be a valuable platform for rapid screening of catalytic materials, efficient optimization of reaction conditions, inline monitoring of reaction progress, and extraction of kinetic parameters.
The design of highly selective, energy efficient, and environmentally benign catalytic processes requires detailed knowledge of the reaction kinetics, efficient evaluation of catalytic materials, and rapid optimization of reaction conditions. Advances in continuous flow microreactor technologies have brought opportunities to address these challenges.1–4 The term “microreactor” has been traditionally used to refer to millimeter-diameter tubular reactors used in heterogeneous catalysis. It is now used to designate miniaturized reaction devices with feature sizes in the submillimeter range.5 Microreactors offer a number of advantages over classical catalysis setups.5–7 For instance, heat transfer limitations often encountered in traditional large scale setups diminish the ability to study fast and highly exothermic reactions. The sub-millimeter dimensions and high surface area to volumes of microreactor devices ensure fast heat transfer allowing for precise and rapid control of reaction temperatures. Similarly, mass transfer is enhanced so that reactions can be explored in the absence of, or at least with quantifiable, mass transfer. Another challenge of macroscopic laboratory scale setups is the extensive safety precautions required to investigate high-pressure heterogeneous catalytic reactions.8,9 The small scale of microreactors significantly reduces the needed safety infrastructure enabling expanded window of operation.8,10
Microreactors enable precise control of reaction parameters (e.g. temperature, pressure),11,12 and the reaction conditions can be continuously varied and monitored in flow systems during catalytic processes, greatly accelerating reaction kinetic studies and process optimization.13,14 Moreover, with their small sizes, microreactors use small amounts of reagents (e.g. starting materials, catalysts) to perform catalytic reactions, which makes them cost-effective and suitable as high-throughput screening platforms with parallel reactions in multiple channels.15–17 Inline chemical reaction monitoring and product analysis have been incorporated into continuous flow systems to improve the process control with microreactors.8,18–22
Additionally, the small footprint of these miniaturized devices makes it possible to work in a safer environment by enabling safer surroundings for chemical reactions that use hazardous reactants or intermediates, isolating air-sensitive reagents, and generating less hazardous waste.23–27
Herein we present two case studies of heterogeneous catalytic reactions in continuous flow microreactors, (1) oxidation of 4-isopropylbenzaldehyde and (2) hydrogenation of 2-methylfuran. These examples serve to illustrate the ability to handle reactive, pressurized gases, efficiently optimize reaction conditions, and extract rate and mass transfer information.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 (A) Packaged packed-bed microreactor for catalytic oxidation of 4-isopropylbenzaldehyde. (B) Front view of the reactor channel that is loaded with 11 mg of Pt/Al2O3-5wt% catalyst. |
The experimental setup for hydrogenation reactions consisted of several high-pressure syringe pumps (Teledyne Isco 100DM) for liquid and gas delivery, a back pressure controller (Bronkhorst EL-PRESS), a temperature controller, and a microreactor. The system is operable up to 100 atm from 25 °C to 350 °C. The microreactor is made of silicon and Pyrex (Fig. 2). There are two zones in the reactor, heated and cooled, separated by a halo etched region. A halo etch removes a large cross section of silicon and forms a boundary between the two zones, which allows a temperature gradient to be sustained across the remaining silicon with a lower overall heat flux. A single gas inlet is designed and connected to each of the four main reaction channels. The width and the depth of the catalyst channel are 0.400 mm while the length of the heated region of the catalyst bed is 47 mm.9
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Schematic of the packed-bed microreactor for catalytic hydrogenation of 2-methylfuran (2MF). |
The reaction zone temperature is controlled by using a temperature controller (J-Kem, Gemini-K) and a heating chuck which is made of aluminum. The chuck has two holes into which two resistive cartridge heaters (Omega, CIR-1021/120 V) are inserted. A K-type thermocouple (Omega, KMQSS-062G) is placed between the reactor and the aluminum chuck. The Gemini temperature controller provided feedback control to the cartridge heaters. Using this heating system, a reactor temperature of 25–350 °C was achieved.
In addition, the system incorporated a microfluidic device with an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) section for inline Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). This device is placed at the down stream of the packed bed microreactor and they are connected with a single line of 500 mm long, 0.252 mm ID PEEK tubing. A schematic of the microfluidic cell is given in Fig. 3 and the full details will be reported later.29 The IR data were collected with a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer using a MCT (HgCdTe) detector. For each spectrum, 32 scans were added with a resolution of 4 cm−1. The received catalyst powder (Alfa Aesar) was sieved and the 36–53 μm fraction was used. Before the experiments, the catalyst was reduced in the microreactor under hydrogen flow at 250 °C for 4 h with a ramp of 4 °C min−1. The amount of the catalyst used in an experiment was 6 mg. In a typical experiment, neat 2-methylfuran (2MF) and hydrogen gas were delivered into the microreactor by the syringe pumps. The flow rate of 2MF was 5 μL min−1 and that of hydrogen was 100 μL min−1. The pressure of the system was kept at 45 atm. We investigated several Pt- and Pd-based supported catalysts and have found Pd/C-5wt% (Alfa Aesar) to be the most active and selective for our reactions.
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 Schematic of the microfluidic flow cell with an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) section. It is composed of Pyrex and silicon. The silicon part has optical windows for infrared coupling with the device. The internal volume of the ATR part is 2 μL. |
We chose the oxidation of 4-isopropylbenzaldehyde (IBA) as a probe reaction for studies with microreactors because its corresponding carboxylic acid, cumic acid, is an important intermediate species in the production of pharmaceutical compounds (Scheme 1).31
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 Oxidation of 4-isopropylbenzaldehyde (IBA) to form cumic acid using molecular oxygen as the oxidant. |
Yield and selectivity were explored as a function of temperature and flow rates. As shown in Fig. 4A, the yield of cumic acid increases from a reaction temperature of 60 to 80 °C. A plateau is reached above 90 °C where the yield is over 95%. Therefore, 90 °C was chosen as a reaction temperature for the studies of the dependence of yield/selectivity on the molar ratio of oxygen to IBA (Fig. 4B). The experiments were carried out by varying the flow rate of the liquid phase under a constant flow rate of oxygen (300 μL min−1). When the ratio increases from 0.45 to 1.1, the yield rapidly changes from 67 to 94%. Further increasing the ratio does not result in appreciable change in the yield of cumic acid. Mass balance was maintained in all experiments, indicating that no gas-phase products such as CO2 were formed. The high selectivity (≥98%) could be associated with the efficient heat transfer and precise control of flow rates for reactants, enabled by microreactor technologies, to prevent generation of hot spots and/or secondary oxidation to produce, for example, combustion products.
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 (A) Yield and selectivity as a function of reaction temperature. The flow rates of 4-isopropylbenzaldehyde (IBA) and oxygen were 6 μL min−1 and 300 μL min−1, respectively. A back pressure of 2 atm was applied. (B) Yield and selectivity as a function of molar ratio of oxygen to IBA. The reaction temperature was 90 °C and the back pressure was 2 atm. The concentration of IBA was 1.5 M in n-butyl acetate for all studies. |
Air also proved to be an efficient source of oxidant for the oxidation of IBA. As shown in Table 1, when oxygen (entry 1) is replaced by air (entry 2) to maintain the same molar ratio of O2/IBA the yield decreases from 95 to 76%. The lower yield is probably a result of shorter contact time of the reagents with the catalyst. This assertion is supported by the higher yield observed using a slightly lower flow rate of air (entry 3). Further lowering of the liquid flow rate (entries 4 and 5) leads to an increase in yield. When the liquid flow rate is 1 μL min−1, the yield obtained is comparable with that using oxygen.
Entry | Oxidation reagent | Gas flow rate (μL min−1) | Liquid flow rate (μL min−1) | Space velocity (min−1) | O2/IBA ratio | Yield (%) | Sel. (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a The concentration of 4-isopropylbenzaldehyde was 1.5 M in n-butyl acetate. The reaction temperature was 90 °C and the back pressure was 2 atm. | |||||||
1 | Oxygen | 300 | 6 | 11 | 1.5 | 95 | >99 |
2 | Air | 1500 | 6 | 56 | 1.5 | 76 | >99 |
3 | Air | 1200 | 6 | 45 | 1.2 | 88 | >99 |
4 | Air | 1200 | 2 | 44 | 3.6 | 90 | >99 |
5 | Air | 1200 | 1 | 44 | 7.2 | 95 | 99 |
Importantly, the oxidation reaction appears to be much faster in microreactors than in semi-batches. When oxygen is bubbled through the liquid phase with catalyst dispersed in it in a semi-batch operation, at least a few hours are required for the reaction to complete;31 while the residence time for our system is estimated to be a few seconds based on the space velocity. Notably, the selectivity obtained using microreactors is higher than that with semi-batch operation,31 demonstrating the benefits of microreactors as a result of precise control of reaction conditions, including temperature, pressure, and flow rates of reactants/reagents.
Hydrogenation reactions are challenging to run with traditional systems. The low solubility of hydrogen gas in most of the solvents leads to mass transfer limitations. To offset this difficulty, high pressure operations (up to 100 atm) are often employed, which increases the explosion risks associated with working with hydrogen. The use of small-size microreactors offers a safer, alternative approach to high-pressure hydrogenation reactions.
As an example, we investigated hydrogenation of 2-methylfuran (2MF), a model bio-oil compound, to 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (MTHF) which has been approved as an oxygenated gasoline additive in P series fuels (Scheme 2).35
![]() | ||
Scheme 2 Hydrogenation of 2-methylfuran (2MF) to 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (MTHF) using a Pd/C-5wt% catalyst. |
With the help of the inline attenuated total reflectance (ATR) unit at the downstream of the microreactor, we were able to monitor the reactor effluents with FTIR spectroscopy. During the experiments, the temperature was increased from 25 °C to 160 °C with 15–20 °C intervals while the flow rates for hydrogen and 2MF were kept constant. As shown in Fig. 5, the IR spectrum of the starting material 2MF shows signals at 2930 and 3116 cm−1, corresponding to νas(−CH3) and ν(C–H) vibrational modes, respectively. With the increase in temperature, two peaks emerge and grow in intensity at 2973 and 2861 cm−1, assigned to the stretching bands of saturated (–C–H).36 This observation is consistent with the conversion of 2MF to MTHF. Meanwhile, the intensity of the band at 3116 cm−1 decreases, as expected with increased conversion with temperature. The FTIR spectra reveal no other products indicating that 2MF is selectively hydrogenated to MTHF under the reaction conditions.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 In-line FTIR spectra of hydrogenation reaction for 2-methylfuran at 45 atm from 25 °C to 160 °C. |
Fig. 6A shows the conversion of 2-methylfuran with increasing temperature. At low conversion, the reactor can be considered to be a differential reactor, and a semilog plot of the IR absorbance at 2973 cm−1versus the reciprocal temperature then yields an apparent activation energy of 10.3 kcal mol−1 (inset in Fig. 6B).
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 (A) Conversion of 2-methylfuran and (B) Arrhenius plot for low conversion data. |
Footnote |
† These authors contributed equally to this work. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 |