Yoshifumi
Amamoto
a,
Moriya
Kikuchi
ab,
Hiroyasu
Masunaga
c,
Hiroki
Ogawa
c,
Sono
Sasaki
c,
Hideyuki
Otsuka
*ad and
Atsushi
Takahara
*abd
aInstitute for Materials Chemistry and Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan. E-mail: otsuka@ms.ifoc.kyushu-u.ac.jp; takahara@cstf.kyushu-u.ac.jp
bERATO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
cJapan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute/SPring-8, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan
dInternational Research Center for Molecular Systems, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan
First published on 27th January 2011
Mesh-size control of network structures of chemical gels, i.e. mesh expansion by insertion of styrene derivatives and mesh shrinking by insertion of divinylbenzene in the gels, was carried out. Chemical gels with alkoxyamine at their cross-linking points were synthesized by radical copolymerization of methyl methacrylate and divinyl monomer with alkoxyamine units. The monomers were inserted by heating the gels with each monomer separately, and the network size was evaluated by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements. Since a living polymerization procedure was adopted for the reactions, network mesh sizes were controlled precisely by controlling the reaction time and selecting an appropriate monomer. In addition, gel properties such as swelling degree and phase separation could also be controlled by employing functional monomers such as hydrophilic and fluorinated monomers. These reorganizable chemical gels combine the advantages of high stability of chemical gels with ease of structural changeability of physical gels.
The main advantages of chemical gels are their good mechanical properties and high stability; however, one drawback of these gels is difficulty in changing the gel network structure after its preparation. Because the polymer chains of these gels are connected covalently, it is topologically difficult to change their structures. However, if a reversible covalent bond9–12 would be introduced into the cross-linking points, both the stability and the ability to change the network structure would improve.13 Even though some bonds are cleaved temporarily, the other non-cleaved bonds retain their stabilities and high mechanical strengths. Some examples of functional gels with reversible covalent bonds have been reported previously; sol–gel transition,14–17 photo-induced plasticity,18 self-healing materials,14,19 and so on have been achieved.
We have also developed chemical gels with reversible covalent bonds, ‘reorganizable chemical gels’; they contain alkoxyamine (C–ON) units.20 Although some alkoxyamine compounds derived from styryl radicals and nitroxide radicals, such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO), behave as typical covalent compounds, they polymerize styrene and acrylate monomers under heating conditions, well known as nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization (NMRP),21–23 and they promote crossover reactions between radicals.22 Thus far, we have achieved sol–gel transitions20,24 as well as structural transformations between block copolymers and nanogels.25–29
In a previous paper, we reported insertion of styrene monomers into cross-linking points of polystyrene backbone gels with alkoxyamine by the NMRP process.20 Such insertion has potential to enable precise control of network size and functionalization of the cross-linked polymers. In this study, reorganizable chemical gels with poly(methyl methacrylate) backbones and alkoxyamine at their cross-linking points were designed, and precise mesh-expanding reactions viainsertion of mono-functional monomers and mesh-shrinking reactions viainsertion of bi-functional monomers were achieved by NMRP, as shown in Fig. 1.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Chemical structures and models of reorganizable chemical gels, and their functional monomer insertion and mesh shrinking reactions. |
SAXS measurements. SAXS measurements were carried out at the BL40B2 beamline of SPring-8 using an incident X-ray with wavelength λ = 0.150 nm. Scattered X-rays were detected using a 300 mm × 300 mm imaging plate with a resolution of 0.1 mm/pixel and 2187 mm sample-to-detector distance calibrated by the average of eleven peaks of collagen. The measured gels were swollen in THF and contained in 2 mm glass capillaries. The scattering intensity of the polymers (ΔI(q)) was calculated by subtracting the scattering intensity of the solventIsolv(q) from that of the solution Isoln(q) adjusted through transmittance (Tsolv and Tsoln), as a following equation: ΔI(q) = Isoln(q)/Tsoln − Isolv(q)/Tsolv
Swelling degree measurements. The swelling degrees were estimated by following procedures: swelling weight (Wswelling) was measured after swelling cross-linked polymers into water for 72 h. After that, the swollen gel was dried under vacuum for 24 h, and the gel weight (Wgel) was measured. The swelling degree was calculated using following equation [= (Wswelling − Wgel)/Wgel (wt/wt)].
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 Synthesis of divinyl monomer 1 by a condensation reaction of alkoxyamine diol and methacryloyl chloride. |
Table 1 summarizes the conversions and yields of polymer gel syntheses under three copolymerization conditions. High conversions were obtained in the three cases, indicating that hardly any unreacted vinyl monomers remained in the gels. The yields also show high values, whereas in the case of 2c a comparatively low value (85%) was confirmed. It is conceivable that linear polymers and polymers with fewer cross-linking points were removed at the purification stage, because of lower cross-linking density of 2c. Fig. 2a shows photographs of polymer gels 2a, and clear and lens-like structures in the glass tubes were observed. This is because the main chains of the gels are poly(methacrylate)s, which show high transparency even in the gel state.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 (a) Photographs of cross-linked polymers 2a, and (b) SAXS profiles of cross-linked polymers 2, their fitting curves (black), and each evaluated correlation length (ξ). |
The cross-linking states of three types of the gels differing in number of cross-linking points were investigated by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements using synchrotron radiation at BL40B2 in SPring-8. In static scatterings, Ornstein-Zernike (OZ) equations32 are generally used to evaluate network structures, and their correlation length ξ can be treated as the mesh size. Additionally, heterogeneous structures for cross-linking states should be considered,33 especially in chemical gels. Fig. 2b shows the SAXS profiles for 2a (blue), 2b (red), 2c (green), and their fitting curves (black), which is the sum of the term from the contribution of fractal structures to represent a heterogeneous structure (in the lower q range) and an OZ equation (in the higher q range),34 as follows:
![]() | (1) |
When the radical concentration due to dissociation of alkoxyamine units is constant, the polymerization rate in a first-order reaction should only depend on the monomer concentration, and ln([M]0/[M]) values should increase linearly with reaction time. Fig. 3a shows the kinetic plots (ln[M]0/[M] versus reaction time) in the cases of styrene and PEGSt. Here, [M]0 and [M] are molar concentrations of monomers or styrene derivatives before and after the reactions, respectively, in each reaction time, as determined by NMR measurements of extracted solutions using anisole as an internal standard. In both cases, the ln[M]0/[M] values increased linearly with reaction time, indicating that the monomers were consumed at the same polymerization rate constants. This implies that polymerization proceeded with constant radical concentrations. In other words, the alkoxyamine units are living radical polymerization initiators, and these data confirms that the styrene derivatives were inserted into the cross-linking points of the chemical gels via the NMRP process.
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 Time dependence of (a) ln([M]0/[M]), and (b) correlation length ξ after heating the gels 2b with styrene at 100 °C (circles), and PEGSt at 110 °C (triangles) with anisole ([monomer]/[anisole] = 1/1 (v/v)). |
The network structures during the polymerization of styrene derivatives were characterized by SAXS measurements, and the correlation length values (ξ) were evaluated by OZ functions, as seen in Fig. 3b. In the both the cases of styrene and PEGSt, ξ increased with increasing reaction times, and the ξ values reached from 1.17 nm to 1.75 nm (styrene) and 1.50 nm (PEGSt) after 8 h. This result indicates an increase in the mesh size, because the monomers were inserted into the cross-linking points, as shown in Fig. 1 (left). The characteristic feature of this reaction system is that the mesh sizes are controlled by the reaction time; this is attributed to the fact that alkoxyamine units were used for the living polymerization of styrene derivatives.
In the case of insertion of functional monomers such as PEGSt, the gel properties were expected to undergo notable changes, and this was investigated on the basis of the swelling behaviour of the gel in water. Fig. 4 shows the swelling degree (= (Wswelling − Wgel)/Wgel (wt/wt)) for water after heating 2b with PEGSt for several reaction times. The swelling degree against water increased with increasing reaction time. This is because the hydrophilic PEGSt was polymerized at the cross-linking points, and subsequently, the amount of PEG in the gel increased. As is the case with the mesh size, the swelling degree can also be controlled easily by controlling the reaction time.
In X-ray measurements, differences of electron densities enable the discussion of polymer structures such as phase separations, and fluorinated monomer with high electron density was used as a marker for SAXS measurements. PFSt was polymerized by heating 2b in anisole at 110 °C. Fig. 5 shows SAXS profiles of polymers in THF before and after polymerization of PFSt for 4 h and 8 h. With increasing reaction times, peaks that could not be represented by eqn (1) were confirmed, as indicated by arrows. It was conceivable that the phase separation states were shown, because the electron density of PFSt at the cross-linking points was higher than that of PMMA in the main chain. The sizes of phase separation (2π/q) were estimated to be about 30 nm, which might correspond to the size of higher-cross-linking parts in the chemical gels, because common chemical gels are heterogeneous consisting of regions with varying cross-linking densities.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 SAXS profiles of polymer gels after heating 2b with pentafluorostyrene at 110 °C in anisole for 0 h (blue), 4 h (red), and 8 h (green). |
Fig. 6a shows the kinetic plot (ln[M]0/[M] versus reaction time) in the mesh-shrinking reaction. The molar concentration of DVB ([M]) in each reaction time was estimated by the consumption of the vinyl group in the NMR measurement and not by the conversion of the monomer. The plot was almost linear until 4 h, and deviated from the linearity after 8 h. This is because the gel became more and more dense, causing the insertion of monomers into alkoxyamines to be more difficult. However, the reaction did not stop but continued to proceed slowly even after 8 h. In other words, the NMRP proceeded almost without any side reaction of alkoxyamine units such as carbon-carbon coupling until 4 h.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 Time dependence of (a) ln([M]0/[M]), and (b) ξ after heating 2b with DVB swollen in anisole ([DVB]/[anisole] = 1/1 (v/v)) at 110 °C. The ξ values were estimated by fitting OZ functions to scattering profiles. (c) Illustrations of “inter” and “intra” cross-linking reactions. |
Variations in the mesh size during polymerization of DVB were investigated by SAXS measurements, and the correlation length (ξ) was estimated by fitting OZ functions to the scattering profiles. Fig. 6b shows the time dependence of ξ under the same polymerization conditions as those in the above-discussed reactions. The ξ values decreased with increasing reaction time, from 1.17 nm to 0.70 nm after 8 h. This result indicates that the mesh sizes decreased and the mesh-shrinking reaction was completed successfully. Similar to the mesh-expanding reaction, in the mesh-shrinking reaction as well, the mesh size was controlled by the reaction time, because the mesh-shrinking reaction was based on the NMRP process. These reactions can be explained by two possible mechanisms: connection of “inter” cross-linking points and formation of PDVB at “intra” cross-linking points as illustrated in Fig. 6c. We consider that the mesh-shrinking reaction occurred by an intricate combination of these two mechanisms.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011 |