Anthony Richard
Martin
,
Peter John
Coombes
,
Tracey Lee
Harrison
and
R.
Hugh Dunstan
*
School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia. E-mail: hugh.dunstan@newcastle.edu.au
First published on 9th June 2009
Microbial properties of harvested rainwater were assessed at two study sites at Newcastle on the east coast of Australia. The investigation monitored daily counts of heterotrophic bacteria (HPC), total coliforms and E. coli during a mid-winter month (July). Immediately after a major rainfall event, increases in bacterial loads were observed at both sites, followed by gradual reductions in numbers to prior baseline levels within 7 days. Baseline HPC levels ranged from 500–1000 cfu/mL for the sites evaluated, and the loads following rain peaked at 3590–6690 cfu/mL. Baseline levels of total coliforms ranged from 0–100 cfu/100 mL and peaked at 480–1200 cfu/100 mL following rain. At Site 1, there was no evidence of E. coli loading associated with the rain events assessed, and Site 2 had no detectable E.coli colonies at baseline, with a peak load of 17 cfu/100 mL following rain which again diminished to baseline levels. It was concluded that rainfall events contributed to the bacterial load in rainwater storage systems, but processes within the rainwater storage ensured these incoming loads were not sustained.
Recent studies have given significant insight into the microbial and chemical characteristics of stored rainwater and collected roof runoff.3–15 Although water quality was shown to differ significantly based on various geographical, environmental and tank-design factors, none of the investigations looked at the microbial ecosystem on a continuous basis for defined periods of time.
Assessments based on random, snapshot or event based sampling may falsely represent bacterial loads within stored water. The micro-ecological dynamics of the system may alter survivability of incoming bacteria by nutrient deprivation and competitive exclusion. Assessments of discrete bacterial loads do not provide understanding of the survivability of bacteria entering the system and the processes that may act to regulate the survival of bacteria. A recent study in 2008 by Han and Mun16 investigated particulate sedimentation rates within two rainwater storage tanks, and found as retention time increased, particle numbers decreased. Evidence of a phenomenon that acts to improve harvested rainwater quality has also been proposed.4,7,17
This study sampled water from two rainwater tanks as unique case studies to investigate the changes in abundance of heterotrophic and coliform bacteria resident in the stored water bodies in relation to incoming bacterial loads following rain events over a 31 day period of daily sampling. Collected waters from one rainwater harvesting system were effectively unused over the period. The other system was integrated into the mains water supply for the house with mains water trickle top up of the tank when rainwater supplies were low, and an often high rate of daily water use. The project set out to determine whether rainfall provided a mechanism to facilitate bacterial loading of stored rainwater, and whether or not any increases in bacterial numbers were sustainable after rainfall events. The typically low nutrient microbial ecosystem in rainwater tanks was expected to be characterised by a dynamic and diverse community of bacteria.18 This would suggest an equilibrium composition of bacteria with magnitude of numbers tightly governed by physical conditions and a high level of resource competition.
Site 1 | Site 2 | |
---|---|---|
Catchment surface/age | Galvanised Iron, 30 + yrs | Concrete tile, 5 yrs |
RWT construction/size | 2 × 2.2 kL interconnected tanks, galvanised iron | 2 kL tank lined with food grade polymer, Colourbond™ steel |
RWT age | 4 yrs | 6 months |
Supply | All household water demand | Outdoor use only |
Mains top-up | YES | NO |
First-flush device | NO | NO |
The tank configuration at Site 1 was a dual water supply system with a mechanical mains water top-up that initiates when water storage levels in the tank fall below a depth of 0.4 m. The tank tops up with mains water to a maximum water level of 0.4 m when rainwater levels are drawn below 0.4 m. Installed water meters in the rainwater supply system on the downstream side of the pump and in the mains water top up system were used to determine onsite mains and rainwater use. The basic configuration at Site 2 consisted of a stormwater grade downpipe feeding directly from the roof catchments' surface into the storage. This second site did not have a mains water top-up system or water use meters. Both study sites had trees overhanging the roof catchment area, with growth at Site 1 being more prolific and within a closer proximity to the roof catchment area.
Collected rainwater samples were transported to the laboratory in a chilled-cold box and processed within two hours of collection. Tank water temperature data was recorded daily from both sampling points with the aid of a portable Navi D-54 pH/Temperature meter (Horiba Ltd, Japan). Concentrations of total coliform bacteria and E. coli were determined using the m-ColiBlue24® membrane filtration system (Millipore, Cat #M00PMCB24, Bedford, Massachusetts). One hundred millilitres of each sample were filtered in triplicate onto cellulose esters membranes via vacuum filtration. The membranes were then incubated for 24 hours within sterile petri dishes containing absorbent pads soaked with 2 mL of m-ColiBlue24® broth. The subsequent culture of colonies indicative of E. coli appeared blue in colour, whilst total coliforms appeared red. Figs. 3 & 4 (see Results and discussion section) represent average values obtained for each sampling day for Total coliforms and E. coli respectively. The 1st July m-ColiBlue sample from the Site 1 tap outlet was lost due to misadventure.
Total heterotrophic plate counts (HPC) were also determined for each collection at incubation temperatures of both 25 °C and 37 °C. Briefly, a total of 1mL of rainwater was aseptically plated in replicate from the base and surface levels of the water tank, onto nutrient agar (Oxoid, Australia) and incubated at 25 °C and 37 °C for a maximum of 48 hrs. The plate replicates for each incubation temperature and sampling level were counted with daily average values presented in Table 2 (see Results and discussion section).
All climatic data were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology website found at http://www.bom.gov.au. The source of mains ‘top-up’ water at Site 1 was not subject to any of the bacterial investigations.
Fig. 1 Rainwater storage capacity levels at both sites and daily metered water usage and mains water top-up volumes for Site 1. Arrows indicate days when rainfall was recorded as shown in detail in Fig. 2. |
Current Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG) do not make recommendations for maximum allowable concentrations of HPC as it is of little sanitary value. However, HPC is often used to determine the integrity of a distribution system or the efficacy of water treatment. Significant increases in heterotrophic bacterial counts may be an early indicator of contamination. Similarly, there are no current Australian guideline values for total coliform bacteria in drinking water (although levels of E. coli are used) as recommended by the ADWG due to their common inhabitancy of soil and water. The determination of coliform bacteria in harvested rainwater is often performed for operational monitoring regimes, and can be indicative of faecal contamination or the structural failing of a storage system in contact with surrounding soil.
Both study sites were subject to similar climatic weather patterns as shown in Fig. 2, with July's monthly rainfall totalling 19 mm and 29.4 mm for Sites 1 and 2 respectively. The impact of rainfall was clearly reflected by an insurgence of bacteria within the stored rainwater at both study sites. Rainfall encountered on the 9th of July following an eight day dry weather interval saw HPC values increase by 118% and 143% from the surface and base levels at Site 1, and 317% and 138% at Site 2 respectively. These increases in microbial abundance were attributed to a direct load from roof runoff into the tanks. Post-rainfall dry periods saw a reduction in bacterial populations to pre-rainfall concentrations at both sites within 7 days. During the 31 day period, at least one event of elevated bacterial counts was observed in the skim samples from either tank at separate times independent of rainfall. The origin of this bacterial load was not clear, but it was not detected in subsequent skim samples, nor was it detected in the base level samples. The observed elevations in bacterial numbers at the water surface of the storages may be associated with small inflows of condensation from the roof catchments, and inner tank surfaces.
Fig. 2 Daily heterotrophic plate counts for both surface skim samples and the outlet taps for both sites recorded from samples incubated at 25 °C. |
Fig. 3 Total coliform counts from both the skim and tap outlet samples from the rainwater tanks at both sites. |
Although many of the bacteria grouped as “total coliforms” can be found in the intestinal tract of humans and other animals, the coliform group of bacteria comprise a broad range of microorganisms that are ubiquitous in aqueous and soil environments. Many of the bacteria included in the coliform group have been regarded as non-faecal coliforms.19 The recovery of total coliforms may indicate the presence of organic material such as decaying vegetation as a source of probable contamination.
Fig. 4 Levels of the faecal indicator organism E. coli from both the skim and tap outlet samples from the rainwater tanks at both sites. |
Despite the influx of continued rainfall events, E. coli proved incapable of establishing itself as a resident member of the stored bacterial community under these climatic conditions. These results suggested that the stored rainwater did not provide a sustainable environment for the propagation of the introduced E. coli. In fact, the load of viable bacterial contaminants appeared to be quickly eliminated via a decay process involving either removal from the water body (sedimentation or cell death) or conversion to non-culturable forms of bacteria. The net outcome would appear to represent an equilibration of microbial communities within the stored rainwater to maintain a viable stasis under oligotrophic conditions. Presumably the E. coli were less well adapted to grow under the nutrient limited conditions than the resident heterotrophic bacteria.
Local guideline values in Australia stipulate E. coli to be absent from all drinking waters, as it's regarded the most specific indicator of recent faecal contamination. In this study, E. coli was present from the base outlet on fewer occasions at Site 1 compared to Site 2 with growth observed on seven, and thirteen of the 31 sampling days respectively (see Table 2). The activities of birds and other small animals have generally been speculated to be the principal source of faecal contamination of tank water. This was not assessed in the present study, however, the data indicated that the E. coli were not always present as a component of bacterial load, even when total coliform numbers were high for a given event. This would suggest that the observed total coliforms may have originated from environmental sources such as soil/organic debris, and not from direct faecal contamination. Interestingly, the household occupants at Site 1 did not report episodes of gastrointestinal illness resulting from the consumption of rainwater in the four years since the installation of the onsite tanks. Such an observation reflects findings reported by the Australian government's “Guidance on the use of Rainwater tanks” where despite the prevalence of faecal bacteria, reports of illness associated with rainwater tanks are relatively infrequent.20
Heterotrophic Plate Count | Total Coliforms | E. coli | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cfu/mL | cfu/100 mL | cfu/100 mL | ||||||
Base | Surface | Base | Surface | Base | Surface | |||
25 °C | 37 °C | 25 °C | 37 °C | |||||
Site 1 | 511 ± 427 | 80 ± 67 | 1198 ± 956 | 198 ± 132 | 85 ± 174 | 260 ± 326 | 2.52 ± 7.77 | 0.65 ± 0.91 |
f = 7/31 days | ||||||||
Site 2 | 1304 ± 1460 | 298 ± 254 | 1473 ± 2034 | 110 ± 88 | 158 ± 132 | 147 ± 108 | 1.77 ± 3.07 | 1.87 ± 3.91 |
f = 13/31 days |
Although the impact of chlorinated water on the integrity of a bacterial community can be difficult to measure, the results of this investigation showed a clear reduction in heterotrophic bacteria from the tanks point of supply on days where >200 L of mains water was infused (see 20th, 24th–31st July in Fig. 2). This reduction in resident flora was not observed for skim level measurements, and despite an average mains water input of 282 ± 89 L for the final eight days of sampling, heterotrophic bacterial measurements appeared to exceed baseline microbial concentrations for previous dry weather intervals when little to no mains water was added. The low numbers of total coliforms and heterotrophs observed during the last 7 days from base level collections at Site 1, may represent a dilution effect from the continual mains top up as well as a potential influence of the chlorine on susceptible bacteria. It is proposed that the distribution of bacteria in the water tank would not be uniform due to stratification based on incoming water densities and particle distributions.16
Finally, the relative density of dissolved solids in mains water to harvested rainwater may see the more dense mains water (top up) concentrating towards the base of the tank, influencing population dynamics at the lower level.
At an allotment scale, the carriage of heterotrophic bacteria via rainfall towards storage is unavoidable, regardless of geography or location. The occupants at Site 1 have since pruned or removed branches overhanging the catchment area to minimise the accumulation of organic debris which might support the growth of bacteria. Consideration of ‘point of use’ devices such as tap water filters would also be encouraged to address the occasions when contamination did occur. Although the parameters of this winter study saw both sites unable to support microbial expansions in storage post rainfall, future research is needed to investigate this phenomenon in warmer conditions and diverse locations.
Footnote |
† Part of a themed issue dealing with water and water related issues. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 |