Xavier A.
Conlan
*a,
Nicole
Stupka
*a,
Geoffrey P.
McDermott
b,
Neil W.
Barnett
b and
Paul S.
Francis
ab
aInstitute for Technology research and Innovation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217, Australia. E-mail: xavier@deakin.edu.au; Tel: +61 3 52271416
bSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217, Australia
First published on 21st December 2009
There is great interest in the activity of antioxidant molecules, including polyphenols, from food and plant sources. Acidic potassium permanganate chemiluminescence signal intensity was shown to predict the ability of polyphenols to positively act on cellular redox state and attenuate oxidative stress in cultured skeletal muscle cells.
These foods (e.g. grains, olives and wine) contain a diverse range of chemical components, including polyphenolics, a large and complex family of molecules believed to have health promoting benefits, because of their antioxidant properties.8 They can also enhance cellular endogenous antioxidant defences by the activation of genes encoding for endogenous antioxidant enzymes and molecules.9
The research challenge lies in identifying, prioritising, and possibly isolating these antioxidant molecules to better understand their role in human health and nutrition. There is a lot of interest in prioritising plant phenols based on their antioxidant activities. Current approaches involve arduous sample fractionation into smaller ‘crude’ extracts, followed by cell culture assays, with the bioactive identified only after a positive antioxidant response in the cell, or examination of the antioxidant activities of fractions or specific compounds using various chemical ‘test tube’ assays.10
It is a substantial challenge to identify bioactives with antioxidant potential from complex mixtures. Several screening systems based on chromatographic separation coupled with chemical antioxidant tests (predominantly involving 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) or 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) radicals) have been developed.11,12 These systems enable the antioxidant potential of a molecule of interest to be quantified, but the relationship between activities established by these chemical tests and the action of the compounds in biological systems has been the subject of much debate.10,13 However, in vitro cell culture assays for antioxidant potential have been shown to be significant in relation to in vivo studies.14
The chemiluminescence reaction with acidic potassium permanganate has recently been utilised as a rapid chemical test of the total antioxidant status of wines, fruit juices and teas.15,16 The emission, which emanates from an excited manganese(II) species formed in the reaction,17 is elicited by many organic molecules, but a particularly intense response is obtained for readily oxidisable phenols and related compounds.18 This approach is particularly promising for screening components of complex samples after chromatographic separation, because the fast reaction kinetics avoid the band broadening and associated loss of resolution produced by conventional chemical assays.
However, the full potential of this chemiluminescence reagent to screen for bioactives with antioxidant activity cannot be realised until the relationship between the response for individual compounds and their activity in biological systems is explored. We have therefore compared the relative chemiluminescence signal intensity for a series of bioactive compounds with their antioxidant activity in human primary skeletal muscle cell cultures, to demonstrate the feasibility of this approach.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Effect of 2 day polyphenol treatment on ROS levels in myotubes following H2O2 treatment. In response to increased oxidative stress, resveratrol, gallic acid and rosmarinic acid, but not o-coumaric acid, flavone and cinnamic acid, reduced ROS levels compared to control myotubes (p-value <0.05). |
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Chemiluminescence response (1 × 10−5 M standards). |
Strong chemiluminescence intensities were observed for gallic acid, resveratrol and rosmarinic acid. o-Coumaric acid afforded a more moderate response, whilst cinnamic acid and flavone elicited a relatively small emission intensity. Similar observations were made using other analyte concentrations, from 1 × 10−3 M to 1 × 10−5 M.
To assess the relationship between chemiluminescence signal intensity and in vitro cell culture antioxidant assays, ROS levels were measured in human primary skeletal muscle cell (myotube) cultures. Skeletal muscle is a highly metabolically active tissue constituting ∼40% of body weight and muscle cells are quite responsive to cell stress and antioxidants.19 In initial experiments, myotubes were treated acutely with a given compound and cell ROS levels were assessed in the basal state or in response to oxidative stress (50 µM H2O2) by monitoring the intracellular oxidation of DCFDA using a fluorescent plate reader (Fig. 3). Oxidation of DCFDA is a commonly used assay of generalised oxidative stress, rather than assaying specific free radical species.20,21
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 Effect of acute polyphenol treatment on ROS levels in myotubes following H2O2 treatment. In response to increased oxidative stress, resveratrol, gallic acid, rosmarinic acid and o-coumaric acid, but not flavone and cinnamic acid, reduced ROS levels compared to control myotubes (p < 0.05). |
In subsequent experiments to determine whether the selected compounds can accumulate in the cell and modulate redox state, myotubes were pre-treated with the compound of interest for 2 days, following a brief washout period (coincident with DCFDA loading), ROS levels were assessed in DMEM without phenols in the basal and oxidative stressed state (Fig. 1). The concentration at which individual phenols were tested was selected from preliminary studies of a wider concentration range where cytotoxicity and antioxidant efficacy were evaluated. At the concentrations used here and as determined by lactate dehydrogenase release (CytoTox 96 Assay, Promega), none of the phenols had unwanted toxic effects (data not shown). From these experiments, the in vitro antioxidant potential was assessed and information about cellular uptake was also obtained. To summarise, resveratrol, gallic acid and rosmarinic acid reduced oxidative stress in the basal state and in response to H2O2 treatment, and data from the 2 days phenol treatment experiments suggest that these compounds accumulate within myotubes. o-Coumaric acid did not accumulate in the cell, but in the acute phenol treatment experiments it was able to quench H2O2 in the cell culture media and thus reduce intracellular stress. Following acute and 2 day treatment, flavone and cinnamic acid did not attenuate ROS levels within myotubes nor in the cell culture media in response to H2O2.
Based on these in vitro cell culture assays, at the concentrations used, resveratrol, gallic acid and rosmarinic acid were the most potent antioxidants, with o-coumaric acid having modest antioxidant effects, and flavone and cinnamic acid had no antioxidant activity.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 |