F.
Goutenoire
*a,
O.
Isnard
b,
E.
Suard
c,
O.
Bohnke
a,
Y.
Laligant
a,
R.
Retoux
a and
Ph.
Lacorre
a
aLaboratoire des Fluorures, UPRES-A CNRS 6010, Université du Maine, 72085, Le Mans Cedex 9, France. E-mail: francois.goutenoire@univ-lemans.fr
bLaboratoire de Cristallographie, BP 166, 38042, Grenoble Cedex 9, France
cInstitut Laue-Langevin, BP156X, 38042, Grenoble Cedex 9, France
First published on 5th October 2000
A new family of fast O2− conductors, which exhibit anionic conductivity comparable to that of stabilised zirconia, is presented. The parent compound of this new family, hereafter called LAMOX, is lanthanum molybdate La2Mo2O9. Various substitutions have been attempted: on the lanthanum site (La2 − xAx)Mo2O9 with A = Sr, Ba, K, or Bi; on the molybdenum site La2(Mo2 − xBx)O9 with B = Re, S, W, Cr and V; and on the oxygen site with fluorine. Most of these substitutions suppress the phase transition which occurs in La2Mo2O9 around 580°C from a low temperature α form to a high temperature (more conducting) β form, and stabilise the β form at room temperature. Several members of the LAMOX series are studied through X-ray and neutron diffraction, and conductivity measurements. Large O2− thermal factors and local static disorder agree well with the anionic nature of the conductivity. Partly vacant sites with short inter-site distances suggest a most probable conduction path with tridimensional character.
Given the widespread interest of such materials, any new finding on the topic should stimulate research in the field, with the aim to increase anionic conductivity at lower temperature. Here we present a new family of fast oxide-ion conductors: the LAMOX series, based on atomic substitutions on the parent compound La2Mo2O9.13,14 The most probable conduction path in La2Mo2O9 is deduced from its crystallographic arrangement (Section 2), and the extension (Section 3) and conduction properties (Section 4) of the LAMOX family are explored through several ionic substitutions.
Fig. 1 Arrhenius plot of the conductivity of pure and substituted La2Mo2O9, upon heating (solid symbols) and cooling (open symbols). |
The electron diffraction study was performed on a 200 kV side entry JEOL 2010 electron microscope with a double tilt specimen holder operated at room temperature.
In our previous structural study based on the D1B pattern,14 four different models were tested, the most consistent one appearing to be model D, with three oxygen sites O1, O2 and O3, and a slight cationic deficiency (La3.556Mo3.556O16 = La2Mo2O9). The result of the new refinements using the D2B data, with about 24% more reflections, is in agreement with the previous arrangement (see Table 1, and Fig. 2(a) for final refinement).
Fig. 2 D2B neutron diffraction pattern fits (model D) of the crystal structure of: a) β-La2Mo2O9 at 670°C. Note that the strong undulating background is in this case due to diffuse scattering from the glass container. b) La1.7Bi0.3Mo2O9 at room temperature. In this case the strong undulating background is due to the sample. Dots = observed patterns; lines = calculated patterns; below = difference pattern. |
a B iso = 4/3a2 (β11 + β22 + β33). b Isotropic B thermal factors. c From reference 17, single crystal data. | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | β-SnWO4 | Model A | Model A | Model B | Model B | Model C | Model C | Model D | Model D | |
Formula | SnWO4 | La2Mo2O8 | La1.7Bi0.3Mo2O8 | La2Mo2O9 | La1.7Bi0.3Mo2O9 | La2Mo2O8 | La1.7Bi0.3Mo2O8 | La2Mo2O9 | La1.7Bi0.3Mo2O9 | |
La/Bi (4a) | x | 0.8416(2) | 0.8514(3) | 0.8522(4) | 0.8517(3) | 0.8532(3) | 0.8492(4) | 0.8525(3) | 0.8525(3) | 0.8519(3) |
Sn (4a) | Occupancy | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.889 | 0.889 |
B eq/Å2a | 0.96(2) | 4.6(3) | 3.8(3) | 5.2(2) | 5.2(2) | 5.9(2) | 5.4(2) | 5.9(2) | 5.0(3) | |
Mo (4a) | x | 0.1644(1) | 0.1776(5) | 0.1649(7) | 0.1684(6) | 0.1700(4) | 0.1665(5) | 0.1673(5) | 0.1695(5) | 0.1689(5) |
W (4a) | Occuppancy | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.889 | 0.889 |
B eq/Å2a | 0.69(2) | 4.2(2) | 5.4(3) | 4.4(2) | 2.7(2) | 5.6(2) | 3.9(2) | 4.4(2) | 3.4(3) | |
O1 (4a) | x | 0.3039(16) | 0.333(2) | 0.3137(7) | 0.3144(6) | 0.3142(6) | 0.3141(5) | 0.3138(6) | 0.3179(6) | 0.3171(5) |
Occupancy | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
B eq/Å2a | 1.60(36) | 14.23(2) | 3.5(3) | 6.8(15)b | 6.7(2) b | 9.0(2) | 9.4(2) | 8.4(2) | 8.5(2) | |
O2 (12b) | x | 0.0470(18) | 0.9855(4) | 0.9802(4) | 0.9864(5) | 0.9828(5) | 0.9797(6) | 0.9796(5) | 0.9908(6) | 0.9916(7) |
y | 0.1362(19) | 0.1537(9) | 0.149(2) | 0.177(1) | 0.1710(9) | 0.166(2) | 0.168(1) | 0.179(1) | 0.177(2) | |
z | 0.2271(18) | 0.3287(8) | 0.311(2) | 0.334(1) | 0.3363(9) | 0.329(1) | 0.3328(8) | 0.337(1) | 0.336(1) | |
Occupancy | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.87(1) | 0.97(1) | 0.77(1) | 0.85(1) | 0.66(2) | 0.66(9) | |
B eq/Å2a | 2.02(23) | 10.25(4) | 18.6(2) | 9.2(4) | 10.7(3) | 12.2(4) | 11.6(4) | 6.7(5) | 5.7(4) | |
O3 (12b) | x | 0.919(2) | 0.920(2) | 0.920(2) | 0.907(1) | 0.912(2) | 0.906(2) | |||
y | 0.613(3) | 0.604(2) | 0.608(2) | 0.610(1) | 0.648(4) | 0.667(4) | ||||
z | 0.550(2) | 0.546(2) | 0.549(2) | 0.5482(8) | 0.544(2) | 0.548(1) | ||||
Occupancy | 0.29(1) | 0.18(1) | 0.23(1) | 0.15(1) | 0.34(2) | 0.34(9) | ||||
B eq/Å2a | 8.0(5) | 0.0(2) | 4.5(2) | −1.1(3) | 18.4(1) | 26.5(1) | ||||
R Bragg (%) | 3.4c | 12.6 | 14.2 | 6.1 | 8.94 | 6.4 | 9.21 | 5.7 | 8.01 |
As shown in reference 14, the crystal structure of β-La2Mo2O9 appears to be very close to that of β-SnWO4,17 with extra oxygen atoms in statistical occupation (see Table 1). Cations occupy the same type of positions in both compounds, as well as most anions (see Fig. 3). Given that divalent tin is a lone pair element the tungstate formula can be rewritten Sn2W2O8E2 (E = lone pair). In this case, trivalent lanthanum with no lone pair replaces divalent tin and its lone pair, which is partially replaced by oxygen, so that the formulation of the lanthanum molybdate becomes La2Mo2O8 + 1□. The created vacancy (□) is indeed a favourable element for the extra oxygen migration, as evidenced by the anionic conductivity of the molybdate. As a structural proof, it can be seen on Fig. 3 that the extra oxygen atom partially occupies, in the molybdate, the site normally occupied by the tin lone pair in the tungstate. Besides, the large anisotropic values of oxygen thermal factors, and the undulation of the neutron diffraction background (see Fig. 4, with a first maximum around Q = 3.1 Å−1 characteristic of a minimal O–O distance around 2.5 Å, according to the Debye formula) are further indications of the oxygen disordering.
Fig. 3 Cationic environments in β-SnWO4 (left) and β-La2Mo2O9 (right). For clarity, the environment of La is limited to the nearest neighbours. Hatched and open circle oxygen sites are partially occupied. |
Fig. 4 Detail of the neutron diffraction patterns of β-La2Mo2O9 (below) and La1.7Bi0.3Mo2O9 (above) at room temperature versusQ = 4π sin θ/λ, showing a large diffuse peak in the background around 3.1 Å−1 (due to short range order with pair distances around 2.5 Å). Note that the container contribution to the background is negligible (vanadium container). For clarity, the patterns have been shifted with respect to each other. |
Concerning the crystal structure of the low temperature form α-La2Mo2O9, we have already mentioned14 that it is a 2 × 3 × 4 superstructure of the cubic form with a slight (probably monoclinic) distortion.
Fig. 5 Conduction path in La2Mo2O9: (a) 3D lattice of short O2–□ and O3–□ distances in β-La2Mo2O9 forming infinite paths along the [111] cubic direction (direction of the projection). Orange = oxygen, blue = lanthanum, green = molybdenum; (b) 3D lattice of the conduction paths schematised as infinite cylindrical rods along the cube diagonals (see section on Fig. 5a). |
Fig. 6 Room temperature electron diffraction patterns of: (a) La1.7Bi0.3Mo2O9 (cubic cell). (b) La2Mo2O8.95F0.1 showing a superstructure relative to the cubic cell. |
a Crystallographic parameters: space group P213 (no. 198), Z = 2, a = 7.2342(1) Å, RBragg = 5.7%, Rp = 23.5%, Rwp = 11.3%, Rexp = 8.5%, χ2 = 1.8, number of reflections = 156, number of refined parameters = 35. b O2 and O3 sites are partially occupied. | |
---|---|
La polyhedron | |
La–O2 | 2.496(5) [×3]b |
La–O3 | 2.71(2) [×3]b |
La–O1 | 2.696(4) [×3] |
La–O3 | 2.83(3) [×3]b |
La–O2 | 2.809(7) [×3]b |
Mo polyhedron | |
Mo–O3 | 1.73(4) [×3]b |
Mo–O2 | 1.77(3) [×3]b |
Mo–O1 | 1.83(2) [×1] |
Oxygen–oxygen short distances | |
O1–O2 | 2.574(7) [×3]b |
O1–O2 | 2.789(8) [×3]b |
O1–O3 | 2.79(2) [×3]b |
O2–O3 | 2.30(2) [×1]b |
O2–O3 | 2.86(2) [×1]b |
O2–O3 | 2.68(2) [×1]b |
O2–O3 | 1.54(3) [×1]b |
O2–O3 | 2.98(2) [×1]b |
O3–O3 | 1.74(2) [×2]b |
Compounds | Temperature /°C | a/Å |
---|---|---|
α-La2Mo2O9 | 850–900 | ≈7.149 |
K(5%) | 960 | 7.1718 |
Ba(10%) | 970 | 7.1878 |
Sr(5%) | 1050 | 7.1680 |
Cr(50%) | 700 | 7.1315 |
W(15%) | 1000 | 7.1524 |
W(50%) | 1100 | 7.1535 |
W(75%) | 1100 | 7.1526 |
W(80%) | 1100 | 7.1402 |
Bi(5%) | 850 | 7.1643 |
Bi(10%) | 850 | 7.1757 |
Bi(15%) | 850 | 7.1862 |
S(20%) | 800 | 7.0784 |
S(50%) | 800 | 7.1460 |
V(2.5%) | 900 | 7.1500 |
V(7.5%) | 900 | 7.1480 |
Re(5%) | 900 | 7.1567 |
Partial substitution of oxygen by fluorine was successfully attempted: La2Mo2O8.95F0.1 was prepared from an appropriate stoichiometric mixture of starting materials La2O3, LaOF and MoO3. The synthesis conditions were identical to those of the rhenium substituted compound.
Fig. 7 Evolution upon substitution rate of the cell parameters of different members of the LAMOX family. For α-La2Mo2O9 the cell parameters have been averaged to pseudo cubic. Lines are guides for the eye. |
Substitution by fluorine on the oxygen lattice leads to another type of superstructure, different from that of α-La2Mo2O9 with a tripling of cubic cell parameters and a slight distortion (see Fig. 6).
The conductivity was determined by impedance spectroscopy in the 0.1 Hz–32 MHz range using a Schlumberger Solartron SI1260 frequency response analyser. Each set of data was recorded under dry air flow at the given temperature after 1 h stabilisation. The conductivity of substituted compounds given at 500 and 800°C (Table 4), were obtained from a linear regression of conductivity measured during heating and cooling of the sample.
Compounds | σ/S cm−1 (T = 500°C) | σ/S cm−1 (T = 800°C) |
---|---|---|
α-La2Mo2O9 | 4.6 × 10−5 | — |
β-La2Mo2O9 | — | 8.02 × 10−2 |
K (5%) | 1.40 × 10−5 | 5.65 × 10−3 |
Ba (10%) | 8.56 × 10−6 | 2.74 × 10−3 |
Sr (5%) | 1.20 × 10−5 | 6.03 × 10−3 |
Cr (50%) | 5.42 × 10−4 | 9.98 × 10−3 |
W (15%) | 1.77 × 10−4 | 6.04 × 10−2 |
W (50%) | 9.33 × 10−6 | 4.21 × 10−3 |
Bi (5%) | 2.05 × 10−4 | 6.96 × 10−2 |
Bi (15%) | 1.33 × 10−4 | 2.22 × 10−2 |
S (20%) | 1.01 × 10−4 | 4.81 × 10−2 |
V (2.5%) | 3.00 × 10−5 | 5.20 × 10−2 |
As previously reported,13,14 La2Mo2O9 is a good oxide-ion conductor, as can be seen on Fig. 1 which presents an Arrhenius plot of its conductivity as deduced from impedance measurements. The phase transition around 580°C is accompanied, upon heating, by an abrupt increase of the conductivity by almost two orders of magnitude. In all cases of substitution (Sr, Ba, K, Bi, S, W, Cr and V) no phase transition was observed from conductivity measurements (see Fig. 1).
In most cases the conductivity of the substituted compounds is of the same order as that of La2Mo2O9. For Bi (5%), W (15%) and V (2.5%) substitutions, the conductivity at 800°C is very close to that of β-La2Mo2O9 (see Table 4). In the case of bismuth doping, the large cell parameter increase does not improve anionic conduction probably due to the introduction of the bismuth lone-pair in the conduction path, which tends to block conduction rather than to open the lattice. For Ba (10%), K (5%) and Sr (5%) substitutions, the conductivity at 800°C is almost one order of magnitude lower than that β-La2Mo2O9 (see Table 4). The comparison of the conductivity of the substituted compounds and α-La2Mo2O9 at 500°C presents an interesting feature in the case of Cr (50%): the chromium substitution is the only case where the conductivity below the transition is one order of magnitude higher than that of α-La2Mo2O9 in the whole temperature range (see Fig. 1).
Footnote |
† Basis of a presentation given at Materials Discussion No. 3, 26–29 September, 2000, University of Cambridge, UK. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2001 |