Xi Cuiab,
Youju Huang*b,
Jingyun Wangab,
Lei Zhangb,
Yun Rongb,
Weihua Lai*a and
Tao Chen*b
aState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China. E-mail: talktolaiwh@163.com
bDivision of Polymer and Composite Materials, Ningbo Institute of Material Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Science, No. 1219 Zhongguan West Road, Zhenhai District, Ningbo 315201, China. E-mail: yjhuang@nimte.ac.cn; tao.chen@nimte.ac.cn
First published on 8th May 2015
Because of the distinctive features of ease-of-use, low cost and portable detection, a gold nanoparticle (AuNP) based lateral flow immunoassay (LFA) is an effective and currently used method for the detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7; however, its low sensitivity limits its practical use. In the present study, the size and uniformity of AuNPs have been systematically optimized to maximally amplify both the visual inspection signals (the color of test line) and the quantitative data (light intensity) recorded using a bioassay reader. The remarkable enhancement of detection sensitivity can be increased to 102 colony forming units per mL by taking advantage of the optimized AuNPs and the separated incubation of the AuNPs/antibody/E. coli O157:H7 complex. Quantitative detection of E. coli O157:H7 was partially obtained in a wide concentration range with good repeatability. The new, optimized AuNPs-based LFA is well suited to fast quantitative and qualitative food analysis.
From the standpoint of ease/broadness of use, low cost and portable detection, lateral flow immunoassay (LFA), particularly, gold nanoparticle (AuNPs) based LFA, is an effective and currently used method,7,8 which is ideally suitable for on-site testing. Wang et al.9 have reported a visually inspected LFA using AuNPs for simultaneous detection of three pesticides. Parolo et al.10 have reported an enhanced LFA using AuNPs loaded with enzymes capable of detecting human immunoglobulin G (IgG). This paper was the inspiration establishing a special AuNP-based LFA to detect E. coli O157:H7,8 but the sensitivity (104 colony forming units (CFU) mL−1) was not very high and limits its practical use as a commercial product. The objective of the present study was to develop a high performance AuNP-based LFA for E. coli O157:H7 detection that would achieve high sensitivity and stability.
Generally, there are three ways to improve the detection sensitivity of an AuNP-based LFA such as designing a sensitive bioassay reader, optimizing the test procedure and improving the properties of the probe materials.11 Compared with the other two ways, exploring the optimized label probes for LFA is a simple and effective means to improve the detection sensitivity. It is well known that AuNPs play a critical role in LFA, because both visual inspection signals (the color of the test line) and quantitative data (light intensity) recorded by the ‘Assay Reader’ originate from AuNPs, which are mainly dependent on their size, shapes, uniformity and aggregation behaviours,12–27 as well as the wavelength coupling between the light source and AuNPs.
In this present study, the size and uniformity of AuNPs were systematically optimized to maximally amplify the detection signals to improve the sensitivity. In addition, the separated incubation of AuNPs/antibody/E. coli O157:H7 complex was used to modify the conventional AuNP-based LFA to improve the stability. The new optimized AuNPs-based LFA allowed us to detect E. coli O157:H7 with an estimated detection limit of 102 CFU mL−1, which is much lower (two orders in concentration) than that of a conventional AuNP-based LFA.
Unlike the conventional strip, a separated incubation of the target analysts was proposed for the modified strip (Fig. 1B), which gives LFA three distinctive advantages. Firstly, it eliminates the AuNP–antibody conjugate pad, making the fabrication of the strip easier. Secondly, the separated incubation of E. coli O157:H7 allows easier control of the reaction time (about 5 min), resulting in the complete interaction with antibody labelled AuNPs, rather than the instantaneous reaction at the AuNP–antibody conjugate pad. This effective incubation of E. coli O157:H7 with antibody labelled AuNPs gives a high detection performance. Lastly, the amount of the separated incubation of E. coli O157:H7 can be randomly increased, and used many times for a large quantity of strips, which significantly improves the stability and repeatability of the test.
It is well known that the size of the AuNPs has an important effect on the performance of AuNP-based LFA.28 Large sized AuNPs usually have a high steric hindrance, which affects the interaction with the labelled antibody/target analytes and impedes the fluidity in the strip, while AuNPs that are too small are not the best option for showing visual inspection signals. In addition, different labelled antibodies/target analytes favour the interaction with different size AuNPs. For the detection of E. coli O157:H7 on a strip, people usually randomly choose AuNPs in the range from 20 to 60 nm; there is not much reported in the literature about the precise investigation of the small window of size effect on the detection performance.
In order to explore the cut-off size where both visual inspection signals and quantitative data (light intensity) could be optimal, AuNPs (gold spheres) were successfully synthesized in a finely tuned size range from 20 to 54 nm. Fig. 2 shows the TEM images of AuNPs of various sizes. It was demonstrated that the smallest AuNPs have a relatively good uniform shape, whereas larger AuNPs are mixed with non-spherical AuNPs, and have a relatively broad size distribution. The average sizes that were obtained from the TEM results were 20 ± 1 nm, 28 ± 1 nm, 35 ± 1 nm, 43 ± 2 nm, and 54 ± 3 nm. The UV-Vis absorption spectra (Fig. 2f) correspond to samples shown in Fig. 2a–e. As the size of the AuNPs increases from 20 to 54 nm, the absorption peaks are noticeably red-shifted from 518 to 533 nm, showing a good agreement with results from previous reports. The different sized AuNPs obtained were used as labelled probes for testing the signal source to investigate the detection efficiency and sensitivity of E. coli O157:H7 in LFA.
The different sized AuNPs were first labelled with a monoclonal antibody, which interacts with E. coli O157:H7 and forms an AuNP/antibody/E. coli O157:H7 complex via the separated incubation. The complex flowed in the strip and was captured by the goat anti-E. coli O157:H7 polyclonal antibody at the T line. The visually inspected color and optical intensity at the T line can be used to evaluate the detection performances quantitatively and qualitatively, respectively.
Fig. 3 shows a typical batch of AuNP-based LFA strips used to investigate the detection performances of E. coli O157:H7 with 35 nm AuNP-based LFA. The detection procedure was repeated at least three times. In the present study, the visual inspection limit was defined as the minimum analyte concentration required for no obvious visual color on the T line. Following this definition, the visual qualitative inspection limit achieved with 35 nm AuNPs was around 103 CFU mL−1. The other sizes of AuNPs labelled LFA samples showed a visual qualitative inspection limit of 103, 104, 105 and 106 CFU mL−1, corresponding to AuNPs sizes of 20, 28, 43 and 54 nm, respectively.
Fig. 3 Specificity of strip for the detection of E. coli O157:H7 (from 0 to 107 CFU mL−1) using 35 nm AuNPs. |
In order to precisely and quantitatively study the detection performance of different sized AuNP probes, the test strips were further subjected to optical density analysis. The light scattering signal of the AuNP aggregates on the T line was monitored using a specific reader. The optical densities of the T line under different concentrations of E. coli O157:H7 from different sized AuNP labelled LFA T lines were recorded and are shown in Table 1. Generally, the optical densities decreased with the decrease of the concentration of E. coli O157:H7. Usually, a threshold value was set to determine the detection limits based on the optical density from the instrument, which can be roughly calculated from average signal intensity and standard deviation (SD) of the negative control (PBS) on the T line. The threshold value was the total contribution of the average signal intensity and three times the SD (average intensity + 3SD). The corresponding concentration of E. coli O157:H7 can be seen as the detection limit, when the detected optical value is bigger than the threshold value. The values highlighted in red in Table 1 were used to show the detection limit from different sized AuNP labelled LFA T lines. The optical density (64 au) on the T line from a 35 nm AuNPs labelled probe was strong enough to be detected even though the concentration of E. coli O157:H7 was as low as 102 CFU mL−1. The same detection process was repeated three times and similar detection limits of 102 CFU mL−1 were obtained, which indicated good reproducibility.
Concentration (CFU mL−1) | Signal intensity of different sized AuNPs based LFA in T line | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 nm | 28 nm | 35 nm | 43 nm | 54 nm | ||||||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
PBS | 28 | 1 | 63 | 5 | 37 | 2 | 44 | 5 | 82 | 2 |
2.8 × 107 | 238 | 10 | 208 | 2 | 746 | 32 | 377 | 21 | 202 | 19 |
2.8 × 106 | 413 | 15 | 712 | 23 | 722 | 28 | 865 | 50 | 443 | 39 |
2.8 × 105 | 284 | 8 | 287 | 8 | 872 | 26 | 782 | 31 | 392 | 32 |
2.8 × 104 | 125 | 6 | 132 | 9 | 324 | 31 | 209 | 18 | 110 | 15 |
5.6 × 103 | 101 | 6 | 101 | 5 | 108 | 12 | 126 | 15 | 109 | 12 |
2.8 × 103 | 58 | 5 | 97 | 10 | 121 | 15 | 95 | 11 | 65 | 7 |
5.6 × 102 | 7 | 2 | 90 | 3 | 100 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 32 | 3 |
2.8 × 102 | 10 | 3 | 56 | 6 | 64 | 10 | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 |
Fig. 4 shows the clear relationship between the size of the AuNPs and the detection performances of E. coli O157:H7 in LFA T lines. It is observed that the detection limit from the optical density at the T line firstly decreases as the size of the AuNPs becomes larger up to 35 nm, and then suddenly increases as the size of the AuNPs continues to increase. This finding implies that neither a small nor a big size of AuNPs benefits the detection limits of E. coli O157:H7. The cut-off size is optimized to 35 nm for the best detection performances of E. coli O157:H7 in AuNP-based LFA. As far as steric hindrance and the optical properties of AuNPs are concerned, smaller sized AuNPs generally have smaller steric hindrance, which provides a strong absorption with antibodies and E. coli O157:H7, and also facilitates their fluidity in the strip, while the larger sized AuNPs in a small size window would offer better optical signals for detection performances. Another possible reason is that the optimized size (35 nm) of the AuNPs has a plasmonic resonance wavelength of 525 nm, which is the same as the wavelength of the light source in the bioassay reader. This coupling effect of light wavelength29,30 would maximally amplify the optical properties of AuNPs for the detection of E. coli O157:H7.
Fig. 4 The relationship between the size of AuNPs and the detection limits of E. coli O157:H7. C is the concentration of E. coli O157:H7 at the detection limit. |
The size uniformity of AuNPs was further investigated to evaluate the detection performances of E. coli O157:H7 in AuNP-based LFA. In order to eliminate the light wavelength coupling effect, all the samples with different PDI (ESI Fig. 1f†) have the same plasmonic resonance wavelength at 525 nm, which were prepared by artificially mixing the different sized AuNP solutions together. The PDI of AuNPs (ESI Fig. 1a–e†) was tuned into 0.26, 0.39, 0.47, 0.52, and 0.61. The optical densities of T line under different concentrations of E. coli O157:H7 with AuNP labelled LFA with different PDIs are shown in Table 2. It is very clear to see that the higher PDIs lead to the higher detection limit (Fig. 5). It is speculated that the possible reason is follows: all samples have the same plasmonic resonance wavelength at 525 nm, which corresponds to AuNPs of 35 nm, which is the optimized size for the best detection. A sample with a lower PDI should contain more AuNPs with 35 nm, which offer bigger contributions to the detection performance; whereas the fewer AuNPs with a size of 35 nm in samples with a higher PDI would lead to the worst detection limits. A sample with a lower PDI was of much more higher uniformity than that with a higher PDI, which provided the optimized optical signals and smaller steric hindrance for absorption with the antibody and E. coli O157:H7. These conditions would lead to the best detection performance.
Concentration (CFU mL−1) | Signal intensity of AuNPs with different PDI based LFA in T line | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.26 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.61 | ||||||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
PBS | 37 | 2 | 55 | 3 | 99 | 2 | 53 | 1 | 60 | 2 |
2.8 × 107 | 746 | 23 | 237 | 15 | 312 | 10 | 148 | 12 | 171 | 12 |
2.8 × 106 | 722 | 26 | 645 | 50 | 566 | 32 | 413 | 22 | 351 | 23 |
2.8 × 105 | 872 | 31 | 242 | 16 | 467 | 41 | 587 | 31 | 127 | 11 |
2.8 × 104 | 324 | 27 | 168 | 20 | 143 | 15 | 128 | 8 | 58 | 10 |
5.6 × 103 | 108 | 12 | 99 | 11 | 73 | 6 | 52 | 3 | 33 | 5 |
2.8 × 103 | 121 | 15 | 69 | 9 | 42 | 5 | 50 | 2 | 34 | 2 |
5.6 × 102 | 100 | 8 | 42 | 10 | 40 | 5 | 16 | 3 | 30 | 3 |
2.8 × 102 | 64 | 9 | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 28 | 3 |
Fig. 5 The relationship between the PDI of AuNPs and the detection limits of E. coli O157:H7 (C is the concentration of E. coli O157:H7). |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra06237c |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |