Study of the alkylation of benzene with methanol for the selective formation of toluene and xylene over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5

Ke Gao, Shuzhen Li, Lei Wang* and Wenya Wang
Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China. E-mail: wl@sit.edu.cn; Tel: +862160873508

Received 23rd April 2015 , Accepted 29th April 2015

First published on 6th May 2015


Abstract

HZSM-5 zeolite was prepared by alkali treatment and NH4+-exchange, followed by modification with cobalt nitrate and lanthanum nitrate via impregnation. The samples were characterized by XRD, SEM, FT-IR, nitrogen adsorption and NH3-TPD. The catalytic performance of Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 for benzene alkylation with methanol under different conditions was investigated. Alkali-treated ZSM-5 zeolite showed a high catalytic activity but a low selectivity for xylene in the reaction. However, the performance of HZSM-5 loaded with Co3O4 and La2O3 was excellent; the total selectivity of toluene and xylene reached 89.02%, and the benzene conversion reached 47.99%. The optimum conditions for benzene alkylation over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 were also determined. The best results were achieved at 723 K under a pressure of 0.1 Mpa for a feed ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 benzene–methanol at a space velocity of 3 h−1. The total selectivity of toluene and xylene was 90.66%, xylene selectivity was 38.07%, and the benzene conversion was 51.36%.


1 Introduction

p-Xylene is an important raw material for the synthesis of terephthalic acid, which is used in the synthesis of nylon and other polyesters.1 The huge demand from the chemical fiber industry means that more countries are planning to set up p-xylene production facilities, and new p-xylene production reached 3.6 Mtons per annum in China in 2012.2 Selective production of p-xylene using zeolite catalysts has attracted much interest in recent years. The ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst is of particular interest owing to its high activity and shape selectivity.3–5 The selective preparation of p-xylene by alkylation of toluene with methanol has been developed. However, direct alkylation of benzene with methanol to prepare p-xylene is a more economical process, although it generates a mixture of toluene and xylene isomers.

Because of the wide use of ZSM-5 zeolite in the petrochemical industry, it is increasingly important commercially.6,7 The activity and selectivity of ZSM-5 in organic reactions is mainly affected by zeolite acidity, and the size and dimensionality of the zeolite channels.8–11 ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts show excellent catalytic performance in the alkylation of benzene. The use of ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts for producing high value-added aromatics is an environmentally friendly method and controlling the pores greatly improves product selectivity.12

Various modifications of ZSM-5 zeolite to increase its catalytic activity and selectivity of the target product have been studied, such as impregnation with metallic or non-metallic compounds,13–15 pre-coking,16 CVD17,18 and CLD.19,20 Bjørgen et al.21 found that NaOH treatment reduced the Si/Al ratio, increased the specific surface area, generated mesopores, and improved the diffusion properties of ZSM-5. Niwa et al.22 found that moderate hydrothermal treatment changed the B acid strength, and the number of acid sites decreased with increasing water vapor partial pressure, although the acid strength increased. Gao et al.23 observed that zinc salt had a great effect on ZSM-5 synthesis; the lower the SiO2/ZnO ratio of the gel, the higher the Lewis/Brönsted ratio. Chandawar et al.24 modified ZSM-5 with P or B to eliminate the strong acid sites on the surface and achieve higher ethylbenzene selectivity. Sidhpuria et al.25 found that the total acid site concentration and acid site density per unit area of Rh/ZSM-5 were lower than those for the corresponding pure ZSM-5 sample, which suggested that significant numbers of acid sites were shielded by the metal particles after Rh loading on ZSM-5 samples. Li et al.26 prepared Mo/ZSM-5 by impregnation and found that B acid sites were covered with [Mo5O12]6+, which was formed after Mo entered the zeolite pores and decreased the amount of acid B and increased the amount of L acid.

In previous studies of alkylation of toluene or benzene with methanol, Aboul-Gheit and colleagues16,27 reported that the para-selectivity increased with the increase of the Pt or Pd content compared with ZSM-5 by narrowing the pore openings, but the overall selectivity for p-xylene was lower than 40%. Inagaki et al.28 concluded that the high selectivity of p-xylene in MCM-22 zeolite was caused by shape selectivity originating from the interlayer 10MR micropores with 12MR supercages, as well as the intralayer sinusoidal 10MR micropores in the MWW structure. Smirniotis and Ruckenstein29 observed that β zeolite favored secondary alkylation reactions and disproportionation reactions of the generated alkylaromatics compared with ZSM-5, because of the pore structure of β zeolite. Yashima et al.30,31 reported that para-selectivity of 45–55% in toluene alkylation by methanol can be achieved by the ion exchange of Y type zeolite with different metal cations. Zhao and colleagues32,33 found that a nanosized ZSM-5 catalyst modified by the SiO2, P2O5 and MgO exhibited high para-selectivity of 98%.

Although previous studies have investigated the catalytic properties of discrete modified ZSM-5 zeolite for the alkylation of benzene with methanol, the overall catalytic performance is not yet satisfactory. This paper is intended to clarify the performance of benzene alkylation with methanol over a Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 catalyst. The structure of the channels and the acidity of ZSM-5 were changed to improve its catalytic performance by alkali treatment and loading of metal oxides. In addition, the effect of temperature, feed ratio and space velocity over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 on the conversion and selectivity were discussed. Xylene is the primary target product, and toluene is the secondary target product.

2 Experiment

2.1 Catalyst preparation

Commercial grade ZSM-5 purchased from Shandong Li Yuan Chemical Group with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 45 was treated with 0.5 mol L−1 NaOH solution at 348 K for 2 h. The samples were separated by vacuum filtration, washed thoroughly with deionized water, dried at 384 K for 12 h, and then calcined in air at 823 K for 4 h. To obtain hierarchical HZSM-5 zeolite, the samples were ion-exchanged with 0.5 mol L−1 NH4NO3 solution at 358 K three times, dried at 383 K for 12 h, and then calcined in air at 813 K for 4 h. The hierarchical HZSM-5 zeolite was soaked in solutions of Co(NO3)2 (0.24 M) and La(NO3)3 (0.19 M) at room temperature overnight. The zeolite was dried in an oven at 383 K for 12 h and calcined in air at 823 K for 4 h to obtain zeolites loaded with Co3O4 and La2O3 by the incipient-wetness impregnation method. These samples were named hierarchical Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5.

2.2 Catalyst characterization

The crystalline phases of the samples were investigated by XRD (XRD-6000, Bruker) using Cu Kα radiation (α = 1.5418 Å) in the 2θ range from 3 to 50°, with a step size of 0.02° s−1. The morphology of the crystalline phase and particle size was determined by SEM (JEM 2000FX, JEOL) with an acceleration voltage of 100 kV. FT-IR spectra were recorded to characterize the zeolite framework vibrations and silanol groups at room temperature (Nicolet 380, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 on a KBr pellet. Pore structure was determined by an adsorption instrument (3H-2000PS4, Bei Shide). Samples were subjected to N2 adsorption–desorption tests after pretreatment at 30 °C under vacuum conditions for 5 h. The specific surface area was determined from the linear portion of the BET plot. Pore volume and pore size were calculated by the HK equation. The acidic properties of the catalysts were calculated by NH3 temperature-programmed desorption (NH3-TPD; Pulse Chemisorb 2720, Micromeritics).

2.3 Catalytic testing

Catalytic activity of the samples was determined in a fixed-bed continuous flow reaction system under different conditions. The catalyst (1 g) was loaded into the reactor, which was 200 mm long and had an actual inside diameter of 30 mm. Benzene and methanol at different molar ratios were introduced directly into the reactor at a series of weight space velocities, and the temperature and pressure were varied. High purity (99.99%) nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at a rate of 40 mL min−1.

The conversion of benzene (CB), the selectivity of toluene (ST) and the selectivity of xylene (SX) are defined by the following equations.

image file: c5ra05041c-t1.tif

image file: c5ra05041c-t2.tif

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Characterization of the catalyst

Fig. 1 shows the XRD pattern of ZSM-5, HZSM-5 andCoO-La2O3/ZSM-5 zeolite. All the patterns show diffraction peaks at 2θ of 7.92°, 8.80°, 14.78°, 23.18°, 23.90°, and 24.40°, which are characteristic of the MFI topology, indicating that the zeolite structure was retained after treatment. No crystalline Co3O4 and La2O3 were detected in the XRD spectra for Co3O4 loading of 3 wt% and La2O3 loading of 3 wt%, which shows that Co3O4 and La2O3 are well dispersed.
image file: c5ra05041c-f1.tif
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of different samples.

Fig. 2 shows the SEM images of ZSM-5, HZSM-5 and Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 zeolite. ZSM-5 zeolite had rectangular crystals with smooth, angular surfaces, and a long-axis length of 5 μm and a short-axis length of 2 μm. Both of the H-ZSM-5 zeolites prepared by alkali treatment and the Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 exhibited an anomalistic ellipsoidal shape with rough surfaces and ill-defined particles. This morphology arose from the alkali treatment to achieve partial desilication, which decreased the crystallinity.


image file: c5ra05041c-f2.tif
Fig. 2 SEM images of catalysts (a) ZSM-5, (b) HZSM-5, (c) Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5, and (d) Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5.

Fig. 3 shows the FT-IR spectra of ZSM-5, HZSM-5 and Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 zeolite. The spectra were characteristic of MFI zeolites. For all samples, in the FT-IR spectra of the framework absorption region (1600–400 cm−1), absorption bands were observed at 1250–1050 cm−1 (external or internal asymmetric stretch), 800 cm−1 (external symmetric stretch), 550 cm−1 (double ring), and 450 cm−1 (T–O bend).23,34,35 FT-IR spectra demonstrated that the addition of Co3O4 and La2O3 did not affect the skeleton framework of the ZSM-5 zeolite. The SEM results are consistent with the XRD test results.


image file: c5ra05041c-f3.tif
Fig. 3 FT-IR spectra of the samples.

Nitrogen sorption isotherms are shown in Fig. 4. The parent ZSM-5 zeolite exhibited type I nitrogen sorption isotherms typical of zeolites, whereas both the modified products of HZSM-5 and Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 produce type IV isotherms associated with mesoporous materials. The textural properties of samples are listed in Table 1, which compares the surface area and pore volume of ZSM-5, HZSM-5, and Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 zeolite samples. Compared with the original ZSM-5 zeolite, the HZSM-5 and Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 zeolite samples showed a slight decrease in the pore volume (VMicro) of the micropores. Micropore volumes are often used as an indicator for the crystallinity of MFI zeolites. The volumes indicated that the sample was well crystallized and retained the enriched micropores and mesopores within the particles. The BET surface area of Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 decreased substantially, because rare earth supported oxides were deposited in the channels of ZSM-5. In contrast, the external surface area increased monotonically, whereas a thin layer of Co3O4–La2O3 formed on the surface.


image file: c5ra05041c-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm and DFT pore-size distribution of (a and b) ZSM-5, (c and d) HZSM-5, and (e and f) Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5.
Table 1 Textural properties of the samples
Sample SBET (m2 g−1) SMicro (m2 g−1) SEXTa (m2 g−1) VMicroa (cm3 g−1)
a Determined by a t-plot according to the method of Lippens and de Boer.
ZSM-5 317.7 299.9 17.8 0.124
HZSM-5 303.2 213.2 90.1 0.093
Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 258.9 179.2 79.7 0.078


The results of NH3-TPD characterization shown in Fig. 5 show that Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 have typical profiles comprising weak and strong acid sites (peaks at 210 °C and 380–390 °C). Alkali treatment reduced the acid amount and strength effectively. The combination of Co3O4 and La2O3 increased the strong acid strength to an extent, but it did not increase the acid amount. Therefore, compared with the original ZSM-5, Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 had a lower weak acid strength, similar strong acid strength and fewer strong acid sites, which is associated with the degree of further alkylation.


image file: c5ra05041c-f5.tif
Fig. 5 NH3-TPD patterns of ZSM-5 catalysts.

3.2 Comparison of benzene alkylation with methanol over different zeolites

The results in Fig. 6 show the benzene conversion and desired product selectivity during alkylation with different catalysts at 693 K, 1.0 h−1 WHSV, and a benzene–methanol molar ratio of 1/1 using a continuous nitrogen flow at atmospheric pressure. Xylene selectivity was in the order Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 > HZSM-5 > ZSM-5.
image file: c5ra05041c-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Comparison of benzene alkylation over different zeolites.

The total selectivity of toluene and xylene, and the benzene conversion were in the same order. Over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5, the total selectivity of toluene and xylene reached 89.02%, the selectivity of xylene was 36.58%, and the benzene conversion also reached 47.99%. The total selectivity of toluene and xylene, the selectivity of xylene and benzene conversion over ZSM-5 were just 78.38%, 23.33% and 37.92%, respectively. Hence, the experimental results clearly indicate alkali treatment improved the open framework. This helps to increase benzene conversion and selectivity of xylene. Co3O4 and La2O3 incorporation in the zeolite has a significant role in activating the catalysts, which together with the acidic sites of ZSM-5 produce the best acidic environment. This change in the acidity is beneficial to xylene production. Overall, the results showed that most of La2O3 entered the channels in ZSM-5 and covered some of the acid sites. Because La2O3 has a high basicity, it is preferentially attracted to strong acid sites, thus preventing further alkylation. However, more Co3O4, which is weakly alkaline, was dispersed on the surface of ZSM-5 and adjusted the surface acidity.36 This could stop the isomerization of the generated xylene. In addition, the metal oxide can narrow the channels, which prevents unintended damage to channels by alkali treatment. All the changes to ZSM-5 helped to improve the selectivity of xylene considerably. Therefore, the modified Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 showed good catalytic performance.

The data in Table 2 shows that while the alkylation time was prolonged, the catalytic properties of HZSM-5 and Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 remained relatively stable. Benzene conversion and xylene selectivity varied slightly with no sharp decline. Benzene conversion decreased gradually after 10 h. This difference is caused by alkali treatment. The large number of mesoporous structures prevented carbon deposition and product blockage, which reduced the barrier between reactants and products in channels. It improved mass transfer efficiency, helping to maintain catalytic activity.

Table 2 Effect of time on stream
Time/h Benzene conversion/% Xylene selectivity/%
ZSM-5 HZSM-5 Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 ZSM-5 HZSM-5 Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5
2 37.67 45.54 47.35 22.84 31.35 37.45
4 37.92 45.31 47.99 23.33 31.06 36.58
8 38.32 44.97 47.07 23.65 31.19 36.92
10 36.98 45.39 48.40 22.71 30.12 37.43
12 35.16 46.03 47.89 24.09 31.77 36.70
14 34.53 45.44 48.03 23.87 30.52 37.12


3.3 Effects of temperature on alkylation over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5

The effect of temperature (623–823 K) on benzene alkylation with methanol is shown in Fig. 7. The total conversion of benzene increased with an increase of temperature between 623–823 K, and reached 51.31% at 823 K. The active sites of the catalyst may not have been activated fully because of the low temperature, meaning that some active centers were not catalytically active. Active sites were all activated at 723 K. Further increases in temperature did not improve the catalytic performance, but also made the catalyst vulnerable to coking deposition and deactivation. Toluene selectivity increased slowly as the temperature increased. Xylene selectivity increased with increasing temperature, and then decreased, reaching a maximum of 36.58% at 723 K. Overheating caused over-alkylation of benzene. The temperature had a significant effect on the reaction; the optimum temperature of the catalytic reaction was 723 K.
image file: c5ra05041c-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Effect of temperature on alkylation over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5.

3.4 Effects of pressure on alkylation over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5

To study the effect of pressure on the alkylation over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5, the pressure was varied from 0.1 to 0.4 MPa at a reaction temperature of 723 K, a benzene–methanol ratio of 1, and a space speed of 1.0 h−1. Fig. 8 shows that within the pressure range investigated, conversion of benzene over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 decreased from 47.99% at 0.1 MPa to 44.85% at 0.4 MPa. However, xylene selectivity increased as the pressure increased from 0.1 to 0.2 MPa, a maximum xylene selectivity of 37.69% was achieved at 0.2 MPa, and then it decreased slightly. Accordingly, the selectivity of toluene decreased slightly with the increase in pressure, indicating that increased pressure promoted the over-alkylation of benzene on Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5. When the pressure was increased, ethylbenzene selectivity increased. This behavior also shows that pressure does not act as an important promoter for benzene conversion. Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 achieved the best catalytic activity and excellent selectivity at 0.1 MPa.
image file: c5ra05041c-f8.tif
Fig. 8 Effects of pressure on alkylation over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5.

3.5 Effects of space velocity on alkylation over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5

Fig. 9 clearly shows that when the space velocity increased from 1 to 5 h−1, benzene conversion increased until it reached a maximum of 52.12% at 4 h−1, and then gradually reduced. Toluene selectivity remained constant. Xylene selectivity first increased, reaching a maximum of 38.07% at a space velocity of 3 h−1, and then decreased. This means that the space velocity determined the contact time of the reactants with the catalyst, which directly affected the degree of further alkylation. The alkylation reaction of benzene and methanol decreased as the contact time of the reactants with the catalyst decreased at a high space velocity, which meant that the reaction only generated toluene. This result in a high selectivity for toluene and a low selectivity for xylene.
image file: c5ra05041c-f9.tif
Fig. 9 Effects of space velocity on alkylation over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5.

3.6 Effects of methanol–benzene ratio on alkylation over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5

The feed ratio of methanol and benzene was increased from 0.5 to 2 to examine the effect on the performance of the Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 catalyst. Fig. 10 shows that increases in the methanol–benzene molar ratio increased the conversion of benzene substantially and gradually increased the selectivity of the desired product, xylene. The benefit of increasing the target product by increasing the ratio addition to 1 was clear, considering the correlation between the selectivity and ratio of methanol and benzene. In addition, methanol promoted further alkylation of benzene to produce xylene. However, methanol partial pressure in the system was high, which led to the dehydration reaction and over-alkylation. A benzene–methanol ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 was the best process conditions for the reaction.
image file: c5ra05041c-f10.tif
Fig. 10 Effects of methanol–benzene ratio on alkylation over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5.

4 Conclusions

We investigated benzene alkylation with methanol as an alkylating agent over Co3O4–La2O3/ZSM-5 for the selective formation of toluene and xylene isomers, particularly p-xylene. We can draw the following conclusions from our results. All the synthesized ZSM-5 catalysts were characterized by XRD, SEM, surface area, FT-IR and NH3-TPD, and were similar. The open framework was improved after alkali treatment to increase the shape selectivity of the catalysts. Mesopores increased the efficiency of mass transfer greatly, which aided the conversion of benzene. The activity of HZSM-5 with Co3O4 and La2O3 at concentrations of 3% was effective for the alkylation of benzene with methanol by changing the number of acid sites and the acid strength. The total selectivity of toluene and xylene reached 89.02%, the selectivity of xylene was 36.58%, and the benzene conversion reached 47.99%. The catalyst also improved the stability of the catalyst significantly. The temperature, pressure, space velocity, and benzene–methanol ratio may be responsible for achieving the maximal values of benzene conversion and the desired product selectivity in benzene alkylation with methanol. The best results were achieved at 723 K under a pressure of 0.1 Mpa when the feed was a ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 benzene–methanol at a space velocity of 3 h−1. The total selectivity of toluene and xylene, the selectivity of xylene, and the benzene conversion were 90.66%, 38.07%, and 51.36%, respectively.

References

  1. S. Mohanty, H. T. Davis and A. V. McCormick, Shape selective adsorption in atomistic nanopores—a study of xylene isomers in silicalite, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2000, 55, 2779–2792 CrossRef CAS.
  2. S.-Y. Qiu, Analysis of PX market present situation and Liaoyang Petrochemical PX development suggestion, Polyester Ind., 2011, 24, 9–12 Search PubMed.
  3. S. Al-Khattaf, N. Tukur and A. Al-Amer, Modeling xylene reactions over ZSM-5 zeolite in a riser simulator: 1,3-versus 1,2-methyl shift, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2005, 44, 7957–7968 CrossRef CAS.
  4. J. Čejka and B. Wichterlová, Acid-catalyzed synthesis of mono-and dialkyl benzenes over zeolites: active sites, zeolite topology, and reaction mechanisms, Catal. Rev., 2002, 44, 375–421 Search PubMed.
  5. N. M. Tukur and S. Al-Khattaf, Comparison studies of xylene isomerization and disproportionation reactions between SSZ-33, TNU-9, mordenite and ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts, Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 166, 348–357 CrossRef CAS.
  6. S. M. Csicsery, Catalysis by shape selective zeolites-science and technology, Pure Appl. Chem., 1986, 58, 841–856 CrossRef CAS.
  7. J. Martens and P. Jacobs, Synthesis of high-silica aluminosilicate zeolites, Elsevier, 1987 Search PubMed.
  8. M. Bejblova, D. Prochazkova and J. Čejka, Acylation reactions over zeolites and mesoporous catalysts, ChemSusChem, 2009, 2, 486–499 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. A. Bhan and E. Iglesia, A link between reactivity and local structure in acid catalysis on zeolites, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 559–567 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. A. Corma, Inorganic Solid Acids and Their Use in Acid-Catalyzed Hydrocarbon Reactions, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 559–614 CrossRef CAS.
  11. P. B. Venuto, Organic catalysis over zeolites: a perspective on reaction paths within micropores, Microporous Mater., 1994, 2, 297–411 CrossRef CAS.
  12. A. Corma, M. E. Domine and S. Valencia, Water-resistant solid Lewis acid catalysts: Meerwein–Ponndorf–Verley and Oppenauer reactions catalyzed by tin-beta zeolite, J. Catal., 2003, 215, 294–304 CrossRef CAS.
  13. N. Chen, W. Kaeding and F. Dwyer, Para-directed aromatic reactions over shape-selective molecular sieve zeolite catalysts, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 6783–6784 CrossRef CAS.
  14. R. Long and R. T. Yang, Fe-ZSM-5 for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3: a comparative study of different preparation techniques, Catal. Lett., 2001, 74, 201–205 CrossRef CAS.
  15. T. F. Degnan Jr, The implications of the fundamentals of shape selectivity for the development of catalysts for the petroleum and petrochemical industries, J. Catal., 2003, 216, 32–46 CrossRef.
  16. A. K. Aboul-Gheit, S. M. Abdel-Hamid and E. A. Emam, Catalytic para-xylene maximization II-alkylation of toluene with methanol on platinum loaded H-ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts prepared via different routes, Appl. Catal., A, 1999, 179, 107–115 CrossRef CAS.
  17. J.-H. Kim, A. Ishida, M. Okajima and M. Niwa, Modification of HZSM-5 by CVD of various silicon compounds and generation of para-selectivity, J. Catal., 1996, 161, 387–392 CrossRef CAS.
  18. M. Niwa, S. Kato, T. Hattori and Y. Murakami, Fine control of the pore-opening size of the zeolite mordenite by chemical vapour deposition of silicon alkoxide, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 1984, 80, 3135–3145 RSC.
  19. Y.-H. Yue, Y. Tang and Z. Gao, Zeolite pore size engineering by chemical liquid deposition, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1997, 105, 2059–2065 CrossRef.
  20. Y.-H. Yue, Y. Tang, Y. Liu and Z. Gao, Chemical liquid deposition zeolites with controlled pore-opening size and shape-selective separation of isomers, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1996, 35, 430–433 CrossRef CAS.
  21. M. Bjørgen, F. Joensen, M. Spangsberg Holm, U. Olsbye, K.-P. Lillerud and S. Svelle, Methanol to gasoline over zeolite H-ZSM-5: Improved catalyst performance by treatment with NaOH, Appl. Catal., A, 2008, 345, 43–50 CrossRef.
  22. M. Niwa, S. Sota and N. Katada, Strong Brønsted acid site in HZSM-5 created by mild steaming, Catal. Today, 2012, 185, 17–24 CrossRef CAS.
  23. J. Gao, L. Zhang, J. Hu, W. Li and J. Wang, Effect of zinc salt on the synthesis of ZSM-5 for alkylation of benzene with ethanol, Catal. Commun., 2009, 10, 1615–1619 CrossRef CAS.
  24. K. Chandawar, S. Kulkarni and P. Ratnasamy, Alkylation of benzene with ethanol over ZSM5 zeolites, Appl. Catal., 1982, 4, 287–295 CrossRef CAS.
  25. K. B. Sidhpuria, P. A. Parikh, P. Bahadur, B. Tyagi and R. V. Jasra, Influence of the surface acidity of ZSM-5 support on the catalytic activity of Rh/ZSM-5 for hydrodearomatization of toluene, Catal. Today, 2009, 141, 12–18 CrossRef CAS.
  26. B. Li, H. Chen, S. Li, N. Li, X. Bao and B. Lin, Distribution of Mo in Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst prepared by impregnation method, Cuihua Xuebao, 2005, 26, 769–774 CAS.
  27. A. K. Aboul-Gheit, S. M. Abdel-Hamid and D. S. El-Desouki, Catalytic para-xylene maximization: IV. Hydroisomerization of meta-xylene on catalysts containing platinum on differently steamed H-ZSM-5, Appl. Catal., A, 2001, 209, 179–191 CrossRef CAS.
  28. S. Inagaki, K. Kamino, E. Kikuchi and M. Matsukata, Shape selectivity of MWW-type aluminosilicate zeolites in the alkylation of toluene with methanol, Appl. Catal., A, 2007, 318, 22–27 CrossRef CAS.
  29. P. G. Smirniotis and E. Ruckenstein, Alkylation of Benzene or Toluene with MeOH or C2H4 over ZSM-5 or beta. Zeolite: Effect of the Zeolite Pore Openings and of the Hydrocarbons Involved on the Mechanism of Alkylation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1995, 34, 1517–1528 CrossRef CAS.
  30. T. Yashima, K. Sato, T. Hayasaka and N. Hara, Alkylation on synthetic zeolites: III. Alkylation of toluene with methanol and formaldehyde on alkali cation exchanged zeolites, J. Catal., 1972, 26, 303–312 CrossRef CAS.
  31. T. Yashima, K. Yamazaki, H. Ahmad, M. Katsuta and N. Hara, Alkylation on synthetic zeolites: II. Selectivity of p-xylene formation, J. Catal., 1970, 17, 151–156 CrossRef CAS.
  32. Y. Zhao, W. Tan, H. Wu, A. Zhang, M. Liu, G. Li, X. Wang, C. Song and X. Guo, Effect of Pt on stability of nano-scale ZSM-5 catalyst for toluene alkylation with methanol into p-xylene, Catal. Today, 2011, 160, 179–183 CrossRef CAS.
  33. Y. Zhao, H. Wu, W. Tan, M. Zhang, M. Liu, C. Song, X. Wang and X. Guo, Effect of metal modification of HZSM-5 on catalyst stability in the shape-selective methylation of toluene, Catal. Today, 2010, 156, 69–73 CrossRef CAS.
  34. J. C. Jansen, F. J. van der Gaag and H. van Bekkum, Identification of ZSM-type and other 5-ring containing zeolites by i.r. spectroscopy, Zeolites, 1984, 4, 369–372 CrossRef CAS.
  35. C. E. Kirschhock, R. Ravishankar, F. Verspeurt, P. J. Grobet, P. A. Jacobs and J. A. Martens, Identification of precursor species in the formation of MFI zeolite in the TPAOH–TEOS–H2O system, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999, 103, 4965–4971 CrossRef CAS.
  36. W. Zou, D. Yang, Z. Zhu, D. Kong, Q. Chen and Z. Gao, Methylation of toluene with methanol over metal oxide-modified HZSM-5 catalysts, Chin. J. Catal., 2005, 26, 470 CAS.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015