Ji Ae
Kang
,
Junseop
Lim
and
Jun Yeob
Lee
*
School of Chemical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066, Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do 16419, Korea. E-mail: leej17@skku.edu
First published on 25th January 2022
Spirobifluorene modified materials, 2,7-bis(4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-9,9′-spirobi[fluorene] (SBFTrz), 2,7-bis(4-phenylbenzo[4,5]thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2-yl)-9,9′-spirobi[fluorene] (SBFBTP) and 2,7-bis(4-phenylbenzofuro[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2-yl)-9,9′-spirobi[fluorene] (SBFBFP), which have good electron transport and thermal properties were developed as electron transport layers (ETLs). The common core, spirobifluorene, is good for transporting carriers due to two fluorene units perpendicular to each other and has a high triplet energy due to disconnection of conjugation through the sp3 carbon. Additionally, the electron transport moieties of diphenyltriazine, benzothienopyrimidine, and benzofuropyrimidine can provide good electron transport properties and high triplet energy. Therefore, the combination of the spirobifluorene core with the electron transport units offered ETLs overperforming a conventional ETL. The new ETL materials lowered device driving voltage, enhanced quantum efficiency, and more than doubled the lifetime of green phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes.
In the design of an ETL, spirobifluorene can be a core structure for good electron transport properties. The spirobifluorene with two fluorene units perpendicular to each other is beneficial for transporting carriers and has high triplet energy due to the disconnection of conjugation through the sp3 carbon.19–23 Several hole transport materials using the spirobifluorene core have been reported. Dong et al. developed a spiro HTL named N-([1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl)-N-(9,9-dimethyl-9H-fluoren-2-yl)-9,9′-spirobifuoren-2-amine which showed high heat resistance and a high hole mobility of 4.91 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1.24 Chai et al. designed a spirobifluorene based HTL, N,N′-(9,9′-spirobi[fluorene]-2,7-diylbis(4,1-phenylene))bis(N-(naphthalene-2-yl)naphthalene-1-amine), which displayed good thermal and morphological stabilities with high current efficiency.25 However, not many studies dealing with the electron transport material using the spirobifluorene core have been reported despite the high carrier mobility of the spirobifluorene derivatives.
In this work, three new ETLs were developed by modifying the spirobifluorene core with planar electron transport units such as 2,4-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazine, 4-phenylbenzo[4,5]thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine and 4-phenylbenzofuro[3,2-d]pyrimidine. Three new spirobifluorene modified ETLs, 2,7-bis(4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-9,9′-spirobi[fluorene] (SBFTrz), 2,7-bis(4-phenylbenzo[4,5]thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2-yl)-9,9′-spirobi[fluorene] (SBFBTP) and 2,7-bis(4-phenylbenzofuro[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2-yl)-9,9′-spirobi[fluorene] (SBFBFP), were synthesized by utilizing the spirobifluorene core. All materials showed better electron mobility and stability than 2,8-bis(4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)dibenzo-[b,d]furan (DBFTrz) which is known as the diphenyltriazine derived ETLs.26 The ETLs enhanced the efficiency and device lifetime of green phosphorescent OLEDs (PhOLEDs). In particular, SBFTrz and SBFBFP doubled the device lifetime of the green PhOLEDs compared to DBFTrz.
Firstly, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were implemented using the Gaussian 16 program to investigate energy levels and frontier orbital distributions. The HOMO and LUMO distributions were pictured using a B3LYP 6-31G* basis set and are presented in Fig. 1. The HOMOs were mainly located on the spirobifluorene core in all compounds, but the HOMOs of SBFBTP and SBFBFP were spread slightly over the benzothienopyrimidine and benzofuropyrimidine units, whereas the LUMOs of SBFBTP and SBFBFP were mostly dispersed over benzothienopyrimidine and benzofuropyrimidine units with little distribution on the spirobifluorene core. The LUMO of SBFTrz was dispersed on the spirobifluorene core and triazine moiety. The calculated HOMO and LUMO levels were relatively deep in SBFTrz due to the strongly electron deficient diphenyltriazine unit.
Fig. 1 Optimized geometry and HOMO and LUMO distribution and energy levels of SBFTrz, SBFBTP and SBFBFP. |
Thermal properties were estimated using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). However, the glass transition temperature (Tg) of materials was not obtained during the heating cycles of DSC measurements. The thermal decomposition temperature (Td) which is the temperature at 5% weight loss was measured by TGA. The Tds of SBFTrz, SBFBTP and SBFBFP were measured to be 492, 467, and 439 °C, respectively, as shown in Fig. 2. The three electron transport materials showed high thermal stabilities of over 400 °C because of the robust spirobifluorene core and hydrogen bonding between the electron transport units and the spirobifluorene core.
The light absorption and emission of the materials were analyzed by ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption and photoluminescence (PL) measurements (Fig. 3). The absorption data were collected using a dilute tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution (1.0 × 10−5 M). The three materials showed absorption peaks below 380 nm assigned to the local absorption of the spirobifluorene core modified with the electron transport units. The absorption edge of the UV-vis spectra was also similar due to the same spirobifluorene core structure. The PL emission characteristics were measured for fluorescence and phosphorescence. The fluorescence wavelengths were gathered with the dilute THF solution at room temperature and the phosphorescence wavelengths were measured with the frozen THF solution after delay time of 1.2 ms. In all, the onset wavelengths of PL emission for SBFTrz, SBFBTP and SBFBFP were approximately 375 nm, indicating that the short wavelength emission comes from the same spirobifluorene core. However, the peak wavelengths of fluorescence were dissimilar, suggesting that the main emission is caused by the extended backbone structure. The red shift of the emission was observed in SBFBTP and SBFBFP due to the largely conjugated electron transport units. The triplet energy could be calculated from the phosphorescence onset wavelength. The triplet energies of SBFTrz, SBFBTP, and SBFBFP were 2.53, 2.43, and 2.47 eV, respectively, following the trend of the singlet energy in Table 1.
λ abs (nm) | E S (eV) | E T (eV) | HOMO/LUMOa (eV) | HOMO/LUMOb (eV) | T d (°C) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a DFT calculations with B3LYP 6-31G*. b Measured by cyclic voltammetry. c Onset wavelength of PL spectra in THF solution. d Onset wavelength of LTPL spectra in frozen THF. e LUMO: measured by cyclic voltammetry, HOMO: estimated from the equation EHOMO = ELUMO–EG. | ||||||
SBFTrz | 388 | 3.31c | 2.53d | −5.75/−2.17 | −6.68e/−3.49 | 492 |
SBFBTP | 391 | 3.30 | 2.43 | −5.38/−1.78 | −6.58/−3.41 | 467 |
SBFBFP | 383 | 3.33 | 2.47 | −5.38/−1.85 | −6.52/−3.29 | 439 |
The HOMO and the LUMO were estimated using 0.1 M tetraethylammonium perchlorate solution with ferrocene as the reference material. As SBFTrz, SBFBTP and SBFBFP had strong electron deficient units, only the LUMO was measured. The HOMO was calculated using the LUMO and HOMO–LUMO gap from the UV-vis absorption edge. The cyclic voltammetry data are represented in Fig. 4. The HOMO and LUMO energy levels of SBFTrz, SBFBTP and SBFBFP were −6.68/−3.49, −6.58/−3.41, and −6.52/−3.29 eV, respectively. The HOMO and LUMO energy levels were deep due to the strong electron deficiency of the compounds. In Table 1, all photophysical, electrochemical and thermal property data of SBFTrz, SBFBTP and SBFBFP are represented.
An electron only device (EOD) was fabricated to measure the electron transport abilities of the ETL materials. The 2,8-bis(4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)dibenzo-[b,d]furan (DBFTrz) electron transport material was utilized as a reference because it has good electron characteristics and has been actively used as an electron transport material. The electron current density data of the four materials are shown in Fig. 5. The electron current density of SBFTrz, SBFBTP, and SBFBFP was much higher than that of DBFTrz, and SBFTrz had the highest electron current density. The electron mobilities of these materials were also investigated with impedance measurements and a similar tendency was observed. As shown in Fig. 6, all new electron transport materials had higher mobilities than DBFTrz. In particular, the mobility of SBFTrz was increased dramatically at high electric fields. The fused structure of spirobifluorene and hydrogen bonding with the electron transport moieties maintained a planar geometry, inducing ordered intermolecular packing for improved electron mobilities.
In order to interpret the electron mobilities of SBFTrz, SBFBTP and SBFBFP, the molecular electrostatic potential was simulated. It was previously known that a low maximum negative electrostatic potential value is suitable for high electron mobility.27,28 A decrease in the absolute value of the electrostatic potential reduces the energy disorder of the given materials and thus increases the corresponding charge carrier mobility. The electrostatic potential map of materials calculated using DFT calculations and the Multiwfn program is represented in Fig. 7.29 The electrostatic potential energy values were −0.89 eV, −1.20 eV and −1.21 eV for SBFTrz, SBFBTP, and SBFBFP, respectively, suggesting that the mobility of SBFTrz would be higher than that of the others.
Fig. 7 (a) Electrostatic potential map of SBFTrz, SBFBTP and SBFBFP (b) comparison of the maximum negative ESP of SBFTrz, SBFBTP and SBFBFP. |
In order to evaluate the performances of the synthesized ETLs, multilayer PhOLEDs were developed based on the green phosphorescence emitter, tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium(III) (Ir(ppy)3). In Fig. S1, (ESI†) the energy levels and chemical structures of the materials used for device fabrication are shown. The device evaluation was carried out with an optimized ETL thickness of 35 nm. The current density–voltage–luminance (J–V–L) data of the green PhOLEDs are shown in Fig. 8(a). The J of the devices at the same voltage was SBFTrz > SBFBTP ≈ SBFBFP > DBFTrz, agreeing with the tendency of electron mobilities. The L of the devices also followed the trend of the electron mobilities.
External quantum efficiency (EQE) plots against J are shown in Fig. 8(b). SBFTrz and SBFBFP devices showed slightly higher EQE than the DBFTrz device and SBFTrz in particular presented the highest EQE. The good electron transport properties of SBFTrz and SBFDBF promoted balancing of holes and electrons, which led to the improvement of the EQE with increased recombination efficiency. The relatively low EQE of the SBFBTP device might be owing to low triplet energy weakly quenching the triplet excitons. Additionally, the refractive index of the ETL materials can be regarded as one factor affecting the EQE. The refractive index measured on a spectroscopic ellipsometer was 1.81, 1.96, and 1.90 for SBFTrz, SBFBTP and SBFBFP, respectively, and these data are presented in Fig. 9. The EQE was high when a low refractive index ETL was used. The ETL is located between the EML and the metallic cathode. Accordingly, the organic layer that has the greatest influence on the surface plasmon polariton (SPP) is the ETL. It has been previously reported that the extent of the loss of the SPP mode is affected largely by the dielectric constant of the cathode and the electron transport layer.16,17,30,31 Therefore, the refractive index of the electron transport layer can be partially responsible for the outcoupling efficiency of the PhOLEDs. The EQE roll-off of the devices was slightly large in the SBFTrz device possibly due to the large change of the electron mobility according to the electric field.
The normalized electroluminescence (EL) spectra of the green PhOLEDs are in Fig. 8(c). All devices showed a main emission peak at 510 nm and a shoulder peak by Ir(ppy)3 emission, but the relative intensity of the shoulder peak was different. The intensity of the shoulder peak was in the order of SBFBTP (2.43 eV) > SBFBFP (2.47 eV) > SBFTrz (2.53 eV) > DBFTrz (2.94 eV), following the order of the triplet energies of ETLs.26 This indicates that the EL spectra are correlated with the triplet exciton quenching of Ir(ppy)3 by the ETL materials. The main emission is quenched by low triplet energy ETLs, which resulted in the relatively strong shoulder peak in the normalized EL spectra. The SBFBTP device with the lowest triplet energy showed the largest shoulder peak in the EL spectrum.
The device lifetime was measured at 3000 cd m−2 and is presented in Fig. 8(d). The SBFTrz and SBFBFP devices showed longer lifetimes than the DBFTrz device. The lifetime of up to 90% of initial luminance (LT90) was doubled by introducing SBFTrz and SBFBFP instead of DBFTrz. This can be explained by the electron stability of the ETL materials as can be justified by the voltage increase of the EOD according to the driving time at a constant current density. A constant electron current density of 10 mA cm−2 was applied to the EOD and Fig. 10 shows the voltage change of the EOD. SBFTrz showed the best electron stability among the ETLs, while DBFTrz exhibited the worst electron stability. All device data are organized in Table 2.
Fig. 10 Voltage increase of the electron only devices of the ETLs according to electron stress time. |
Device | V d (V)a | EQEb (%) | PEc (lm W−1) | CEd (cd A−1) | Color coordinate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[3000 cd m−2] | [Max] | [3000 cd m−2] | [Max] | [3000 cd m−2] | [Max] | |||
a Driving voltage at 3000 cd m−2. b External quantum efficiency. c Power efficiency. d Current efficiency. | ||||||||
SBFTrz | 7.7 | 18.3 | 20.5 | 26.6 | 49.3 | 65.5 | 73.5 | (0.31, 0.62) |
SBFBTP | 8.2 | 16.4 | 19.2 | 22.6 | 51.8 | 58.5 | 68.8 | (0.33, 0.61) |
SBFBFP | 8.0 | 17.7 | 20.5 | 24.7 | 53.1 | 63.2 | 73.6 | (0.32, 0.62) |
DBFTrz | 9.1 | 17.0 | 20.3 | 21.1 | 57.9 | 60.9 | 83.0 | (0.30, 0.63) |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d1qm01610e |
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2022 |