Novel photoluminescent chiral liquid crystalline oligomers containing lanthanide ions

Bing Yao, Yuehua Cong and Baoyan Zhang*
Research Centre for Molecular Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Wenhua Road, Heping District, Shenyang, 110004, PR China. E-mail: baoyanzhang@hotmail.com

Received 5th August 2015 , Accepted 30th September 2015

First published on 30th September 2015


Abstract

Novel photoluminescent chiral liquid crystalline oligomers with lanthanide ions (Ln-LCOs) exhibiting excellent liquid crystalline properties and unique fluorescence properties were prepared using poly(methylhydrogeno)siloxane, cholesteric LC M1, carboxyl-containing LC M2 and anhydrous lanthanide chlorides. The chemical structures and liquid-crystalline behaviors of Ln-LCOs were characterized by various experimental techniques. The introduction of low content of lanthanide ions endowed the oligomers with significant luminescence properties. All the oligomers were chiral. The lanthanide ions did not change the liquid crystalline textures of the oligomers which were confirmed by X-ray diffraction. Fourier transform infrared imaging study indicated that the lanthanide ions were evenly distributed in the oligomers, which avoided the fluorescence quenching caused by the aggregation of lanthanide ions. A binary complex model with lanthanide ions acting as central ions and chiral liquid crystalline oligomers acting as ligands was established to express the interaction and distribution of the components. The Ln-LCOs showed reversible mesomorphic phase transitions, wide mesophase temperature ranges, and high thermal stabilities. The thermogravimetric analysis results displayed that the decomposition temperatures (5% weight loss) of all Ln-LCOs were greater than 300 °C. The Ln-LCOs can emit red light or green light when being excited. Luminescence intensities of the Ln-LCOs gradually increased with an increase of lanthanide ions from 1 to 4 mol%. The temperature dependence of luminescent intensity was studied, where the fluorescence intensities of Ln-LCOs decreased monotonically with an increase of temperature in liquid crystalline phases.


1. Introduction

Lanthanide luminescent complexes are fascinating materials and they have received much attention due to their exhibiting the excellent property of emitting particularly efficient strong narrow-width spectra in the visible light region1,2 with potential applications in probes for DNA,3 molecular devices,4 lasers,5 optical storage, sensors6,7 etc. However, the low thermal stability, high phase inversion temperature and low mechanical strength are major defects which hamper their practical applications.8,9 In order to overcome these shortcomings, some researches have been committed to solve these problems by combining lanthanide complexes with inert matrices, for instance, liquid crystal (LC) materials,10–12 polymers,13,14 organic–inorganic hybrid materials15 or sol–gel glasses.16,17 In principle, chiral liquid crystalline oligomers seem to be promising due to their excellent thermal performances, good processabilities, unique optical properties such as selective reflection of light, circular dichroism, thermochromism18–21 and their potential applications in full-color liquid crystal displays, anisotropic light emitters, nonlinear optical materials, lasers,22–26 etc. Chiral liquid crystalline oligomers with luminescence properties are fascinating materials. For one thing, the stable silicone backbones strengthen the thermal stabilities of photoluminescent chiral liquid crystalline oligomers and broaden the working temperatures; furthermore, the ordered helical structures of chiral liquid crystalline oligomers improve the uniform distribution of lanthanide ions, which increases the luminous efficiency of such ions. It is possible that luminescent chiral liquid crystalline materials will lead to new technical applications in many fields such as optics, mechanics, electronics, displays and so forth. However, luminescent lanthanide-containing chiral liquid crystalline oligomers (Ln-LCOs) have been described rarely so far. As a consequence, designing and synthesizing multifarious lanthanide-containing liquid crystalline oligomers have extremely great realistic significances.

In this paper, a series of novel Ln-LCOs were synthesized by graft copolymerization and coordination. The schematic illustration of Ln-LCOs was established. The lanthanide ions were distributed in the helical matrixes of LCOs by coordinating with carboxyl. The Ln-LCOs can emit red light or green light when being excited. Luminescence intensities of the Ln-LCOs gradually increased with an increase of lanthanide ion content.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Poly(methylhydrogeno)siloxane (PMHS, Mn = 582) was obtained from Jilin Chemical Industry Co. (Jilin City, China). 3-Bromopropene, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4,4-dihydroxybiphenyl, hexanedioic acid, isosorbide, terephthalic acid, sulfurous dichloride, N,N-dicyclohexyl carbodiimide (DCC), 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP), toluene, chloroform, ethyl alcohol, sodium isopropoxide, tetrahydrofuran and pyridine were purchased from Shenyang Chemical Co. (China). Cholesterol was purchased from Henan Xiayi Medical (China). Anhydrous TbCl3 and EuCl3 were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. (China). Toluene and tetrahydrofuran were purified by distillation over sodium hydride before use. All other solvents and reagents were purified by standard methods.

2.2. Measurements

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were measured with a Nicolet 510 FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet Instruments, Madison, USA). Element analyses were carried out by an Elementar Vario ELIII (Elementar, Germany). 1H NMR (600 MHz) spectra were measured by a Varian WH-90PFT NMR spectrometer (Varian Associates, Palo Alto, CA). The polarized optical microscopy (POM) study was performed with a Leica DMRX (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a Linkam THMSE-600 (Linkam, Surrey, England) heating stage. Specific rotations of the oligomers were measured by a WZZ-2S automatic polarimeter. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed using nickel-filtered Cu-Kα (λ = 1.542 Å) radiation monochromatized with a DMAX-3A Rigaku powder diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan). FTIR imaging was performed using a Spotlight 300 infrared imaging system (PerkinElmer). The thermal transition properties were characterized using a DSC 204 instrument (Netzsch, Wittelsbacherstr, Germany) at heating and cooling rate of 10 °C min−1 under nitrogen atmosphere. The thermal stabilities of the oligomers were measured under nitrogen atmosphere with a Netzsch TGA 209C thermogravimetric analyzer at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. A HORIBA Jobin Yvon FL3-TCSPC fluorescence spectrophotometer was used for fluorescence measurements.

2.3. The synthesis of M1 and M2

The synthesis routes of cholesteric liquid crystalline cholesteryl 4-(allyloxy)benzoate (M1) and carboxyl-containing liquid crystalline 4-(((6-((6-((4′-((4-(allyloxy)benzoyl)oxy)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)oxy)-6-oxohexanoyl)oxy)hexahydrofuro[3,2-b]furan-3-yl)oxy)carbonyl)benzoic acid (M2) are shown in Fig. 1.
image file: c5ra15655f-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Synthesis routes of liquid crystalline M1 and M2.

2.4. The synthesis of chiral liquid crystalline oligomers

All the oligomers were obtained by the same synthesis routes. The feed ratio and yield are summarized in Table 1. The synthesis of O1 is taken as an example. Liquid crystalline M1 (0.52962 g, 0.97 mmol), M2 (0.02253 g, 0.03 mmol) and PMHS (0.08314 g, 0.1428 mmol) were dissolved in 15 mL of dry, freshly distilled toluene. 0.2 mL of Pt catalyst (0.50 g of hexachloroplatinic acid hydrate dissolved in 100 mL of THF) was added to the stirred solution and heated under nitrogen and anhydrous conditions at 90 °C for 48 h. The reaction was monitored by following the disappearance of the Si–H band at 2166 cm−1 in the FTIR spectra. The complete disappearance of the Si–H band indicated successful incorporation of M1 and M2 into the polysiloxane chains. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was filtered. O1 was obtained after solvent evaporation and washing with hot anhydrous ethyl alcohol three times and drying at 45 °C in a vacuum oven for 12 h. IR (KBr): 3402 cm−1 (–OH), 2925, 2872 cm−1 (–CH3, –CH2–), 1710, 1688 cm−1 (C[double bond, length as m-dash]O), 1605, 1508 cm−1 (Ar–), 1127–1007 cm−1 (Si–O–Si).
Table 1 Feed ratio and yield
Sample Feed Ln3+ (mol%) Yield (%) Specific rotationsa
PMHS (mmol) M1 (mmol) M2 (mmol) LnCl3 (mmol)
a Specific rotations were measured when oligomers were dissolved in toluene (ρ = 0.2 g L−1).
O1 0.1428 0.97 0.03 −7.36
O2 0.1428 0.94 0.06 −5.84
O3 0.1428 0.91 0.09 −4.28
O4 0.1428 0.88 0.12 −3.06
Tb–O1 0.1428 0.97 0.03 0.01 1 86 −7.29
Tb–O2 0.1428 0.94 0.06 0.02 2 80 −5.78
Tb–O3 0.1428 0.91 0.09 0.03 3 82 −4.21
Tb–O4 0.1428 0.88 0.12 0.04 4 79 −2.97
Eu–O1 0.1428 0.97 0.03 0.01 1 81 −7.31
Eu–O2 0.1428 0.94 0.06 0.02 2 79 −5.76
Eu–O3 0.1428 0.91 0.09 0.03 3 83 −4.24
Eu–O4 0.1428 0.88 0.12 0.04 4 78 −2.99


2.5. The synthesis of Ln-LCOs

The synthesis routes of the Ln-LCOs are shown in Fig. 2. The feed ratio and yield are summarized in Table 1. The synthesis of Tb–O1 is taken as an example. Anhydrous terbium chloride dissolved in benzene and anhydrous isopropanol (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) was heated to 50 °C for 12 h under N2, adding a solution of sodium isopropoxide in isopropanol to the stirred solution. The mixtures were refluxed for 5 h to obtain terbium isopropoxide and then a solution of oligomer O1 dissolved in toluene was added dropwise to the stirred solution. The reactive mixtures were refluxed for 12 h. After cooling to room temperature, the mixtures were filtered. After the solvent evaporated, the crude products were washed with anhydrous cyclohexane three times and dried at 30 °C in a vacuum oven for 12 h to obtain the target oligomer Tb–O1. Yield: 86%. IR (KBr): 2925, 2869 cm−1 (–CH3, –CH2–), 1728, 1711 cm−1 (C[double bond, length as m-dash]O), 1605, 1508 cm−1 (Ar–), 1127–1007 cm−1 (Si–O–Si). The absorption bands at 1688 cm−1 (C[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching of carboxyl) and 3402 cm−1 (O–H stretching of carboxyl) disappeared; therefore, the Tb–O1 was successfully synthesized.
image file: c5ra15655f-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Synthesis routes of Ln-LCOs.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Liquid-crystalline behaviors of M1 and M2

Fig. 3 shows DSC thermograms of liquid crystals M1 and M2 in the first heating cycle. M1 displayed a crystalline melting peak at 112.9 °C (ΔH = 36.95 J g−1) and a mesogenic–isotropic phase transition peak at 238.5 °C (ΔH = 1.361 J g−1) in the heating cycle. M2 displayed a crystalline melting peak at 155.4 °C (ΔH = 32.58 J g−1) and a mesogenic–isotropic phase transition peak at 245.1 °C (ΔH = 1.965 J g−1) in the heating cycle.
image file: c5ra15655f-f3.tif
Fig. 3 DSC thermograms of M1 and M2.

Fig. 4 displays some representative optical textures of M1 and M2 which were obtained by POM with a hot stage in the first heating and cooling cycles. When M1 was heated above 112.9 °C, it became bright and the LC textures appeared. With the temperature rising, the textures became bright in color and oily streak textures of cholesteric phase were seen as shown in Fig. 4a. The oily streak textures disappeared and the sample became isotropic at 238.5 °C. When the melt was cooled, it showed broken focal-conic textures as shown in Fig. 4b. When M2 was heated above 155.4 °C, the sample began to melt, and the oily streak textures of cholesteric phase gradually appeared as shown in Fig. 4c. The oily streak textures disappeared and the sample became isotropic at 245.1 °C. When the melt was cooled, broken focal-conic textures appeared as shown in Fig. 4d.


image file: c5ra15655f-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Optical textures of M1 and M2: (a) oily streak textures of cholesteric phase on heating to 146 °C; (b) broken focal-conic textures on cooling to 198 °C; (c) oily streak textures of cholesteric phase on heating to 193 °C; (d) broken focal-conic textures on cooling to 202 °C.

3.2. Optical textures of LCOs and Ln-LCOs

Fig. 5 illustrates some representative optical textures of O2, Eu–O2 and Tb–O2. All of the samples showed similar cholesteric phase textures in the first heating and cooling cycles indicating that lanthanide ions did not seriously affect the liquid crystalline textures of the oligomers. For the sample Tb–O2, when it was heated above 72.3 °C, it became bright and the cholesteric Grandjean textures gradually appeared. With the temperature rising, the textures became bright in color as shown in Fig. 5c and disappeared at 248.7 °C. Similarly, when the melt was cooled to 243.2 °C, the cholesteric Grandjean textures appeared. Liquid crystalline textures of O2 and Eu–O2 are shown in Fig. 5a and b respectively. Opticity is one of the important optical properties for chiral liquid crystals. It is the proof of helical structures of chiral liquid crystals. The opticity study indicated that all the oligomers were chiral in accordance with the POM results and the specific rotations of the oligomers are summarized in Table 1. The cholesteric mesophase of LCOs and Ln-LCOs was also confirmed by XRD diffraction. XRD studies could provide more detailed information on liquid crystalline structures. Fig. 6 shows the representative X-ray diffraction curves of O2, Eu–O2 and Tb–O2 at 110 °C. All the samples showed broad peaks in the wide-angle region around 2θ ≈ 18–20°; furthermore, a sharp peak associated with the smectic layers did not appear in the small-angle region. Therefore, LCOs and Ln-LCOs were of cholesteric phase which is in accordance with the POM results.
image file: c5ra15655f-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Optical textures of O2, Eu–O2 and Tb–O2 (200×): (a) Grandjean textures of O2 on heating to 198.5 °C; (b) Grandjean textures of Eu–O2 on heating to 210.5 °C; (c) Grandjean textures of Tb–O2 on heating to 205.5 °C.

image file: c5ra15655f-f6.tif
Fig. 6 XRD curves of O2, Eu–O2 and Tb–O2 at 110 °C.

3.3. Distribution of lanthanide ions in Ln-LCOs

Carboxylates exhibit characteristic absorptions at 1419 cm−1. Subsequently, the total infrared absorptions of Ln-LCOs were tested by a FTIR imaging system to analyze the distribution of lanthanide ions in the oligomers. The samples were dissolved in chloroform and anhydrous isopropanol (5[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) to prepare the same concentration of each solution. The same volume of each solution was put onto a KBr window, and the sample tested after solvent evaporation. Finally the characteristic infrared absorptions of carboxylates at 1419 cm−1 were marked in the total absorptions of Ln-LCOs; the representative infrared images of Tb–O1, Tb–O2, Tb–O3 and Tb–O4 are displayed in Fig. 7a–d. The green areas represent weak absorptions at 1419 cm−1, and the yellow and red areas represent strong absorptions at 1419 cm−1. It is obvious that the terbium ions were evenly distributed in the oligomers instead of getting together to form clusters. Furthermore, the content of terbium ions in Tb-LCOs was in the order of Tb–O4 > Tb–O3 > Tb–O2 > Tb–O1, which was consistent with the theory.
image file: c5ra15655f-f7.tif
Fig. 7 IR imaging of Tb–O1 (a), Tb–O2 (b), Tb–O3 (c) and Tb–O4 (d).

Combining the analysis results of POM, opticity, XRD and FTIR imaging, a binary complex model with lanthanide ions acting as central ions and chiral liquid crystalline oligomers acting as ligands was established to express the interaction and distribution of the components as shown in Fig. 8. The lanthanide ions were evenly distributed in the helical matrixes of LCOs by coordinating with carboxyl in chiral mesogens. The Ln-LCOs emit red light or green light when being excited.


image file: c5ra15655f-f8.tif
Fig. 8 Schematic illustration of Ln-LCOs. The cyan rods represent the cholesteric mesogens, the yellow rods represent carboxyl-containing cholesteric mesogens, the blue lines represent the backbones of liquid crystalline oligomers, and the brown spheres represent the lanthanide ions which can form coordinate bonds with the carboxyl in cholesteric mesogens.

3.4. Thermal properties

For the LCOs and Ln-LCOs, Table 2 shows the phase transition temperatures obtained in the second heating cycles and decomposition temperatures. The effects of lanthanide ions on phase transition temperatures and decomposition temperatures are shown in Fig. 9. The quantized values of glass transition temperatures (Tg) and mesophase–isotropic phase transition temperatures were obtained from the software included with the Netzsch instrument. All the LCOs and Ln-LCOs displayed glass transitions and mesophase–isotropic phase transitions when they were heated from −8 °C to 295 °C in the second heating cycles suggesting that lanthanide ions did not change the liquid crystalline state of the oligomer systems. Some representative DSC curves of oligomers are illustrated in Fig. 10. As seen from Fig. 9, the Tg values of LCOs and Ln-LCOs increased with an increase of M2. Furthermore, the Tg values of Ln-LCOs were higher than those of LCOs for the same feed ratio. This result indicated that lanthanide ions introduced into helical matrixes of LCOs by coordination bonds imposed additional constraints on segment motions of oligomer chains, which might be expected to raise the glass transition temperatures.
Table 2 DSC, POM and TGA results of LCOs and Ln-LCOs
Sample DSC ΔTa POM TGA
Tg (°C) Ti (°C) Ti1b (°C) Ti2c (°C) T5%d (°C)
a Mesophase temperature ranges (TiTg).b Temperature at which the birefringence disappeared completely.c Temperature at which the mesophase occurred.d Temperature at which 5% weight loss occurred.
O1 69.4 229.8 160.4 232.7 227.6 298.4
O2 70.1 232.0 161.9 235.4 230.7 302.6
O3 70.6 233.6 163.0 237.2 232.8 305.8
O4 71.1 235.2 164.1 239.3 234.3 309.3
Tb–O1 71.8 247.1 175.3 252.4 246.8 304.7
Tb–O2 72.3 244.6 172.3 248.7 243.2 310.9
Tb–O3 73.0 239.7 166.7 243.5 237.5 316.5
Tb–O4 73.7 236.6 162.9 239.7 235.3 323.5
Eu–O1 71.6 248.2 176.6 253.7 247.3 304.1
Eu–O2 72.1 244.9 172.8 250.2 243.8 310.3
Eu–O3 72.8 240.4 167.6 244.6 238.3 315.7
Eu–O4 73.4 237.2 163.8 240.3 236.5 322.6



image file: c5ra15655f-f9.tif
Fig. 9 Effects of lanthanide ions on phase transition temperatures and decomposition temperatures.

image file: c5ra15655f-f10.tif
Fig. 10 DSC thermograms of O3, Tb–O3 and Eu–O3 in the second heating cycles.

Similarly, the mesophase–isotropic phase transition temperatures (Ti) of Ln-LCOs were higher than those of LCOs for the same feed ratio. For the Ln-LCOs, heating to the isotropic state needed additional energy to contort the oligomer backbones from the anisotropic state at crosslinking formed by lanthanide ions and carboxyl in chiral mesogens. However, the Ti values decreased slightly with an increase of lanthanide ions in the Ln-LCO systems. This result indicated that chemical crosslinking could prevent the motions and orientations of mesogenic molecules which was not conductive to the mesogenic orientations. Ti values were in the order of Ln–O1 > Ln–O2 > Ln–O3 > Ln–O4 > O4–O1. Both Tb-LCOs and Eu-LCOs displayed wide mesophase temperature ranges (ΔT) as shown in Table 2.

The thermal stabilities of the Ln-LCOs play an important role in determining their working temperature limits and environmental conditions. The thermal stabilities of oligomers are related to their thermal decomposition temperatures (Td). Temperature for 5 wt% loss is always used as Td to estimate thermal stability of an oligomer. Some representative thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of Ln-LCOs are illustrated in Fig. 11. The Td of all Ln-LCOs was above 300 °C showing obviously good thermal stabilities, which indicated that the stable silicone backbones of chiral LCOs prominently strengthened the thermal stabilities of photoluminescent chiral Ln-LCOs and broadened the working temperatures. Furthermore, for all samples, the decomposition temperatures were in the order of Ln–O4 > Ln–O3 > Ln–O2 > Ln–O1 > O4–O1 which indicated that Td increased with the introduction of lanthanide ions.


image file: c5ra15655f-f11.tif
Fig. 11 TGA curves of Tb-LCOs.

3.5. Luminescence properties of the Ln-LCOs

The Ln-LCOs in LC phases were obtained by quick freezing in liquid nitrogen vitrified mesophase. The luminescence properties of Ln-LCOs in LC states were examined. The typical emission spectra of Tb–O1 and Tb–O3 are presented in Fig. 12 and the emission spectra of Eu–O1 and Eu–O3 are presented in Fig. 13. The detailed luminescence data are shown in Tables 3 and 4. The excitation spectrum wavelength of Tb-LCOs was 282 nm obtained by monitoring the maximum emission line 5D47F5 at 545 nm. In the emission spectra of Tb–O1, the bands near 489 nm, 545 nm, 582 nm and 619 nm were assigned to the 5D47FJ transitions with J = 6, 5, 4 and 3 respectively. Characteristic narrow-width green emissions were observed in all Tb-LCOs, which indicated that effective energy transfers took place. The excitation spectrum wavelength of Eu-LCOs was 376 nm. The emission lines of Eu–O1 near 580 nm, 591 nm, 615 nm, 649 nm and 696 nm were assigned to the 5D07FJ transitions with J = 0–4 respectively. Characteristic narrow-width red emissions were observed in all Eu-LCOs.
image file: c5ra15655f-f12.tif
Fig. 12 Emission spectra of Tb–O1 and Tb–O3 at room temperature.

image file: c5ra15655f-f13.tif
Fig. 13 Emission spectra of Eu–O1 and Eu–O3 at room temperature.
Table 3 Luminescence data of the Tb-LCOs
Sample Excitation bands (nm) Emission bands (nm) Relative intensitiesa
a Relative intensities were obtained by the calculation of the integral area of the same emission bands.
Tb–O1 282 489, 545, 582, 619 85.6, 227.9, 14.0, 7.1
Tb–O2 282 488, 545, 583, 620 155.6, 414.3, 25.5, 12.7
Tb–O3 282 489, 545, 582, 620 230.9, 727.3, 36.0, 16.1
Tb–O4 282 489, 544, 582, 619 307.9, 969.7, 48.0, 21.44


Table 4 Luminescence data of the Eu-LCOs
Sample Excitation bands (nm) Emission bands (nm) Relative intensitiesa
a Relative intensities were obtained by the calculation of the integral area of the same emission bands.
Eu–O1 376 580, 591, 615, 649, 696 12.9, 74.3, 305.1, 6.1, 5.7
Eu–O2 376 579, 590, 616, 649, 697 19.2, 127.5, 526.4, 6.5, 7.3
Eu–O3 376 579, 589, 616, 650, 697 26.0, 173.0, 714.4, 8.82, 9.92
Eu–O4 376 578, 590, 616, 648, 696 33.1, 220.2, 909.3, 11.2, 12.6


For all samples, the luminescence intensities gradually increased with an increase of lanthanide ions accordingly from Ln–O1 to Ln–O4. When Ln3+ content = 4 mol%, the Ln-LCOs did not show fluorescence quenching due to the Ln3+ being evenly distributed in the ordered helical structures of the chiral liquid crystalline oligomers, which increased the luminous efficiency of lanthanide ions. The introduction of oligomers was beneficial to the increase of luminescence intensity. Firstly, the oligomers coordinated to the Ln3+ ions with carboxyl which can satisfy the coordination number and so replace water molecules, reducing the non-radiation deactivation resulting from hydroxyl stretching. Secondly, the oligomers increased the absorption cross-section, so increasing the luminescence intensity.

In order to research the thermal stability of photoluminescence in the LC phases, it is necessary to measure the temperature dependence of fluorescence intensity. Fig. 14 exhibits the emission spectra of Tb–O2 at different temperatures. It was apparent that the fluorescence intensities of Tb–O2 decreased monotonically with an increase of temperature in the scope of the study. Consistent with theory, the fluorescence intensity as a function of temperature fits well the famous thermal activation function:27

I(T) = I0/[1 + α[thin space (1/6-em)]exp(−EA/KBT)]
where I0 is emission intensity at 0 K, α is a proportionality coefficient, EA is thermal activation energy, KB is Boltzmann's constant and T is absolute temperature. For the same Ln-LCOs, the value of EA is the same. It is possible that the fluorescence intensities of the photoluminescent chiral Ln-LCOs can be quantitatively adjusted by accurately controlling the temperature.


image file: c5ra15655f-f14.tif
Fig. 14 Temperature-dependent emission spectra of Tb–O2.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a series of novel photoluminescent chiral liquid crystalline oligomers containing lanthanide ions were synthesized and characterized. All the Ln-LCOs are chiral. They displayed similar cholesteric Grandjean textures confirmed by X-ray diffraction, which indicated that the introduction of low content of lanthanide ions did not change the liquid crystalline states of the oligomers. A binary complex model was established to express that lanthanide ions were uniformly distributed in the helical matrixes of LCOs by coordinating with carboxyl in chiral mesogens. The Ti and Td of Ln-LCOs were higher than those of LCOs for the same feed ratio. The Ln-LCOs showed wide mesophase temperature ranges and obviously good thermal stabilities. The Ln-LCOs can emit red light or green light when being excited. With an increase of lanthanide ion content from 1 to 4 mol%, the luminescence intensities of Ln-LCOs gradually increased. The ordered helical structures of chiral liquid crystalline oligomers improved the uniform distribution of lanthanide ions, which increased the luminous efficiency of the lanthanide ions. The fluorescence intensities of the Ln-LCOs decreased with an increase of temperature in the LC phases. It is feasible that the fluorescence intensities of Ln-LCOs can be quantitatively adjusted by accurately controlling the temperature. The combination of liquid crystalline properties and fluorescence properties of Ln-LCOs makes them possible candidates for the fabrication of multifunctional optical materials.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the National Key Technology Support Program of China (contract grant number 2008BAL55B03) and the Science and Technology Department of Liaoning Province for financial support of this work.

References

  1. F. Y. Zheng, J. Zhang and S. Y. Feng, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 9957–9964 RSC.
  2. L. Armelao, S. Quici, F. Barigelletti, G. Accorsi, G. Bottaro, M. Cavazzini and E. Tondello, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2010, 254, 487–505 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. S. V. Eliseevaa and J.-C. G. Bünzli, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 189–227 RSC.
  4. S. M. Bruno, R. A. S. Ferreira, F. A. Almeida Paz, L. D. Carlos, M. Pillinger, P. Ribeiro-Claro and I. S. Gonçalves, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 4882–4895 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. L. N. Sun, Y. N. Qiu, T. Liu, H. S. Peng, W. Deng, Z. J. Wang and L. Y. Shi, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 26367–26375 RSC.
  6. W. Ahmad, L. J. Zhang and Y. S. Zhou, CrystEngComm, 2014, 16, 3521–3531 RSC.
  7. J. Garcia-Torres, P. Bosch-Jimenez, E. Torralba-Calleja, M. Kennedy, H. Ahmed, J. Doran, D. Gutierrez-Tauste, L. Bautista and M. Della Pirriera, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2014, 283, 8–16 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. K. Binnemans, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 448–453 RSC.
  9. K. Binnemans, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 4283–4374 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. Y. T. Yang, K. Driesen, P. Nockemann, K. van Hecke, L. van Meervelt and K. Binnemans, Chem. Mater., 2006, 18, 3698–3704 CrossRef CAS.
  11. T. Cardinaels, K. Driesen, T. N. Parac-Vogt, B. Heinrich, C. Bourgogne, D. Guillon, B. Donnio and K. Binnemans, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 6589–6598 CrossRef CAS.
  12. Y. G. Galyametdinov, A. A. Knyazev, V. I. Dzhabarov, T. Cardinaels, K. Driesen, C. Görller-Walrand and K. Binnemans, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 252–257 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. L. H. Wang, W. Wang, W. G. Zhang, E. T. Kang and W. Huang, Chem. Mater., 2000, 12, 2212–2218 CrossRef CAS.
  14. K. Kuriki, Y. Koike and Y. Okamoto, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 2347–2356 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. K. Sheng, B. Yan, X. F. Qiao and L. Guo, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2010, 210, 36–43 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. A. M. Klonkowski, S. Lis, M. Pietraszkiewicz, Z. Hnatejko, K. Czarnobaj and M. Elbanowski, Chem. Mater., 2003, 15, 656–663 CrossRef CAS.
  17. L. N. Sun, Y. N. Qiu, T. Liu, H. S. Peng, W. Deng, Z. J. Wang and L. Y. Shi, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 26367–26375 RSC.
  18. J. W. Wang and B. Y. Zhang, Liq. Cryst., 2013, 40, 1550–1560 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. J. B. Guo, J. M. Zhang, Q. Zhang, N. Jiang and J. Wei, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 21620–21627 RSC.
  20. S. J. Wezenberg, F. Ferroni, S. Pieraccini, W. B. Schweizer, A. Ferrarini, G. P. Spada and F. Diederich, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 22845–22848 RSC.
  21. O. T. Picot, M. Dai, E. Billoti, D. J. Broer, T. Peijsab and C. W. M. Bastiaansenab, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 18794–18798 RSC.
  22. M. O'Neill and S. M. Kelly, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 1135–1146 CrossRef PubMed.
  23. U. A. Hrozhyk, S. V. Serak, N. V. Tabiryan and T. J. Bunning, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2007, 17, 1735–1742 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. B. Wang, H. Y. Du and J. H. Zhang, Steroids, 2011, 76, 204–209 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. A. A. Khan, M. A. Bin-Kamarudin, P. R. Kidambi, S. Hofmann, T. D. Wilkinsona and M. M. Qasim, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 57437–57443 RSC.
  26. G. Shanker and C. V. Yelamaggad, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2011, 115, 10849–10859 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. H. Zhang, H. W. Song, H. Q. Yu, X. Bai, S. W. Li, G. H. Pan, Q. L. Dai, T. Wang, W. L. Li, S. Z. Lu, X. G. Ren and H. F. Zhao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 6524–6527 CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the samples, synthesis procedures of M1 and M2, 1HNMR (600 MHz) spectra of M1 and M2. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra15655f

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.