Jin-Hua Wang,
Jia-Bin Xiong,
Xing Zhang,
Song Song,
Zhi-Hua Zhu and
Yan-Song Zheng*
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China. E-mail: zyansong@hotmail.com; Fax: +86-27-87543632; Tel: +86-27-87543632
First published on 3rd July 2015
A new imidazolium macrocycle based on tetraphenylethylene (TPE) has been synthesized. This positively charged macrocycle showed a typical aggregation-induced emission (AIE) effect but fluorescence emission could not be induced by common inorganic anions in aqueous solution, including pyrophosphate bearing four negative charges. However, in the presence of a half equivalent of zinc(II) ions, the addition of pyrophosphate anions could arouse a strong fluorescence while other common inorganic anions gave almost no response. The macrocycle has an inherent cavity with the correct size for binding a pyrophosphate anion, so that the pyrophosphate anion can be easily aggregated together with the macrocycle and a zinc cation, which selectively triggers a turn-on fluorescence.
In 2001, Tang’s group reported a new class of organic compounds with an amazing fluorescence property, that is, they had no emission in solution but emitted strong fluorescence in an aggregation state or as a solid.6 This novel fluorescence phenomenon was coined as aggregation-induced emission (AIE) and a probable mechanism of the restriction of intramolecular rotation (RIR) for the fluorescence was suggested. Since then, AIE fluorophores have attracted a great deal of attention due to their potential application in bio/chemosensors and solid emitters.7 Especially, due to the significant fluorescence change between aggregation and de-aggregation, AIE compounds have received more attention in research as bio/chemosensors.7,8 However, research work for the sensing of phosphate anions by the AIE effect,9 especially for the selective sensing of anions in aqueous solution,10 is very rare. The reason behind this might be because of the solvent competing effect in highly polar solvent.11 Herein, we report the synthesis of an imidazolium macrocycle based on tetraphenylethylene (TPE). The macrocycle could selectively detect pyrophosphate anions in aqueous solution in the presence of zinc(II) ions.
Fortunately, the single crystal of compound 6 was obtained by slow evaporation of its solution in THF/H2O. The crystal structure is monoclinic with C2 space group symmetry and cell parameters of a = 33.698, b = 8.9588, c = 10.793 Å and α = γ = 90°, β = 107.81°.14 The distance between the two opposite nitrogen atoms of 6 is 5.836 Å as shown in Fig. 1. The macrocycle forms a rectangle cavity approximately 8.294 × 5.836 Å2 in size (Fig. 1A). As an interesting packing mode, the cavities can stack upon each other to form a channel which is filled with solvents and counter ions. The channels arrange in parallel to give a 3-dimensional network (Fig. 1B).
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 (A) The crystal structure of 6. (B) The crystal packing pattern of 6, hydrogen atoms are hidden for clarity. |
The imidazolium macrocycle 6 is soluble in highly polar solvents such as acetonitrile and methanol but cannot be dissolved in less polar solvents, such as hexane. Hence, its AIE effect could be observed in the mixed solvent of THF and hexane (Fig. S1†). A solution of 6 in THF (containing 0.5% acetonitrile) was not light emitting, but it appeared fluorescent at 472 nm after 50% hexane (volume percentage, the same below) was added and a clouding effect started to be observed. After that, the fluorescence became stronger with the continued addition of hexane.
Similarly, an aqueous solution of 6 (5.0 × 10−5 M) in water containing 0.5% DMSO exhibited almost no emission. By addition of various anions, such as pyrophosphate P2O74− (PPi), PO43− (Pi), HPO42− (HPi), H2PO4− (H2Pi), SO42−, SO32−, NO3−, NO2−, HCO3−, CO32−, C2O42−, F−, Cl−, Br− and I− (counter ion, Na+), no obvious enhancement of the emission could be observed. However, upon addition of one equivalent of Zn(OAc)2 before or after the addition of anions, the pyrophosphate anion gave rise to a strong blue emission while other anions resulted in almost no emission under a 365 nm lamp light (Fig. 2). This clearly indicated that 6 could be used as a selective turn-on sensor for pyrophosphate anions in the presence of Zn(II). It was found that other some divalent transition metal ions, such as Cu(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), Co(II), and Cd(II), also changed the emission intensity but the effect was much less than that of Zn(II) (Fig. S2†). The titration of 6 (5 × 10−5 M) with Zn(II) in the presence of two equivalents of PPi showed that the fluorescence intensity reached a maximum after the addition of 0.5 equivalents of Zn(II) (Fig. S3†), which was 25 times larger than that without Zn(II).
Moreover, even in the presence of a mixture of other anions with each anion being of one equivalent to 6, the PPi anions aroused a strong fluorescence while the mixture of other anions without PPi only gave rise to a very weak fluorescence (Fig. 3). The intensity difference between the mixtures of anions with and without PPi was more than 10-fold. In addition, the fluorescence aroused by PPi in the presence of other anions was almost the same as that in the absence of the other anions. This result demonstrated that other anions did not interfere with the detection of PPi by this fluorescence receptor.
A fluorescence titration of 6 (5 × 10−5 M) with pyrophosphate anions in the presence of Zn(II) (2.5 × 10−5 M) in H2O containing 0.5% DMSO was also performed (Fig. 4). When a small amount of pyrophosphate anions was added, the enhancement of fluorescence was not significant. This might result from the solubility of the complex formed upon the addition of pyrophosphate anions. In the range of 0.6–2.0 equivalents of pyrophosphate anions, the fluorescence intensity rapidly increased with the added anions. After that, the increase in the fluorescence intensity became slow and finally stopped when 2.4 equivalents of the pyrophosphate anions were added.
A UV-Vis titration confirmed the interaction between 6 and the pyrophosphate anion (Fig. 5). With the addition of pyrophosphate anions, the absorption peaks both at 253 nm and 313 nm decreased while a new absorption band at about 400 nm increased. Moreover, the absorption at 313 nm had a small bathochromic shift toward 320 nm with the anion. This obvious change demonstrated the formation of a stable complex between 6 and the pyrophosphate anion even without zinc(II). The association constant of the complex, according to a 1:
1 molar ratio of the complex between 6 and pyrophosphate, was calculated to be (1.41 ± 0.10) × 104 M−1 by non-linear curve fitting of the absorbance at 253 nm vs. the concentration of pyrophosphate (Fig. S4†).15 In the presence of Zn(II), the UV-Vis titration of 6 with PPi was very similar to that of without Zn(II) (Fig. S5†), indicating that the metal ions did not directly interact with the macrocycle but only with the anion ions.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 Change of the absorption spectra of 6 in water containing 0.5% DMSO with PPi. Inset, curve of the absorbance at 253 nm vs. the concentration of PPi. [6] = 5.0 × 10−5 M. |
From the above absorption spectra, it was found that the mixing of 6 and PPi easily led to the formation of the 6–PPi complex, probably because the two negative charges at the two ends of one pyrophosphate anion (each end is a phosphate unit) are at a correct distance that can just allow the binding of the two positive charges in the molecule of 6 (Fig. 6). As discussed earlier, in the crystal structure of 6 the distance between the nitrogen atoms of each imidazolium unit of 6 is about 5.836 Å while the longest distance between the oxygen atoms of each phosphate unit of PPi is 5.36 Å. Therefore, the cavity of 6 composed of two imidazolium units is suitable for the inclusion of one molecule of PPi to form a 6–PPi complex, driven by an electrostatic attraction (Fig. 6). The new absorption peak at about 400 nm of 6 upon addition of PPi demonstrated that PPi had such a strong interaction with 6 that the acidic proton on the imidazolium unit was probably removed by the pyrophosphate anion. In the presence of a zinc cation, the two-component 6–PPi complex was transformed into a five-component (6–PPi)4–Zn complex due to one zinc cation being coordinated by two 6–PPi complexes. With continued coordination, an aggregate of (6–PPi)4–Zn complexes formed, therefore, it gave a strong fluorescence.
In addition, both the emission spectrum and the excitation one of the suspension of 6 in THF/hexane 10:
90 were similar to that of the 6–PPi–Zn mixture in aqueous solution, hinting that the complex of 6–PPi–Zn existed in an aggregation state (Fig. S6†). The dynamic light scattering (DLS) diagram corroborated that the mixture of 6, PPi and Zn(II) in water formed aggregates with an average diameter up to 2800 nm (Fig. S7†). Due to its solubility in water, the 6–PPi complex was not light emitting, but the five component (6–PPi)4–Zn complex had low solubility, so it was able to emit a strong fluorescence (Fig. 6). The formation of the 6–PPi complex in a 1
:
1 molar ratio was confirmed by the ESI+ HRMS spectrum of a mixture of 6 and sodium pyrophosphate (calcd for C66H58N4Na3O11P2 1213.3270 [6–PPi + 3Na+]+, found 1213.3265 [6–PPi + 3Na+]+) (Fig. S8†).
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthesis of compounds and additional spectra, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, IR, and HRMS spectra of compounds 2–6. CCDC 1402520. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c5ra09721e |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |