Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Infrared spectroscopy at the surface of carbonates

Taha Elgayyar*, Federico Azzolina-Jury and Frédéric Thibault-Starzyk
Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS, Laboratoire Catalyse et Spectrochimie, 14000 Caen, France. E-mail: tahaelgayyar1@gmail.com

Received 10th June 2025 , Accepted 2nd October 2025

First published on 8th October 2025


Abstract

IR spectroscopy has been extensively employed to characterize the structural and vibrational properties of carbonates; yet, its application in studying the adsorption capacity of carbonate surfaces remains limited. This short review presents the use of FTIR as a powerful tool for investigating the structure and surface chemistry of carbonates, which is relevant to several environmental and industrial applications (such as CO2 capture and storage). Several FTIR techniques provide detailed analysis of the structure of carbonate polymorphs (calcite, aragonite, vaterite, and amorphous phases) alongside their phase transformation kinetics. In addition, adsorption studies of various molecules (CO, CO2, H2O, acids and several HCs) were performed to identify the adsorption sites, mechanisms and intermediates. These insights highlight the significance of IR spectroscopy for understanding the carbonate structure and surface properties, and guide future research in several environmental and industrial processes where carbonates are involved.


Introduction

The surface chemistry of solid carbonates has recently gained particular interest in the fight against the greenhouse effect and climate global warming, for CO2 capture and storage, as well as for its further use (e.g. in methanation reactions6). Carbonates are also increasingly considered as adsorbent materials for various chemicals such CO,1 H2O,1 CO22 and HCs.3–5

Mastering surface chemistry of carbonates is not possible without a good understanding of the possible adsorption modes and of the various possible reaction mechanisms on the surface of carbonates. One of the most powerful methods for monitoring adsorption phenomena is infrared spectroscopy6 and it has been used extensively to study the formation of surface carbonates by adsorption of CO2 on various oxides.7 Carbonates themselves have been studied by IR spectroscopy but a systematic study of adsorbed species on solid carbonates is still missing.

This work reviews literature information and data obtained by IR spectroscopy on the various chemical species found on the surface of carbonates, together with the basic information on the carbonate structure where relevant.

The infrared spectrum of the core structure of carbonates

Before it was used to study adsorbed species on carbonates, IR was largely employed in all spectral regions, from near to far IR, for characterising the composition, structure and crystalline phases of carbonates.

Vibration bands of the structure of the carbonate ion

Isolated planar ions of the form XO3 with trigonal symmetry such as CO32− exhibit four fundamental modes of vibration.8,9 The frequencies of these vibration modes, as reported in the literature,10,11 are shown in Table 1. An interesting feature is the progressive increase of the frequency of the ν4 vibration with the radius of the counter cations.12
Table 1 Approximate IR frequency ranges of the four fundamental vibration modes of carbonate10,11
Vibration mode ν1 ν2 ν3 ν4
Assignment Symmetric in-plane stretch Out-of-plane bend Asymmetric in-plane stretch In-plane bend
Wavenumber (cm−1) 1070–1090 850–880 1400–1500 700–750


Carbonates also display, between 2900 and 4000 cm−1, some other IR absorption bands due to overtones and combinations of the fundamental bands,13 including some weak combination bands at 1795 and 2514 cm−1.3 Interestingly, for studying surface species, some combination bands around 3000 cm−1, indeed due to the carbonate structure, are sometimes mistaken for C–H stretch absorption bands.

The different IR techniques such as IRRAS, DRIFTS, transmission IR and ATR display differences in the spectra measured for the same sample. Fig. 1 (ref. 14) shows IR spectra of BaCO3 measured using four IR techniques. This figure shows the higher surface sensitivity of DRIFTS and transmission IR as evidenced by the surface bands observed in the 2400–3000 cm−1 region and assigned to O–H stretching of hydrogen carbonate species,15 while ATR and IRRAS are rather bulk-sensitive. Interestingly, there are noticeable band ν3 position shifts between all four techniques, mostly due to the instrument configuration. The IRRAS spectrum displayed a significant blueshift, which could be due to a change in the refractive index while scanning over the band range.


image file: d5cp02197a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 IR spectra of BaCO3 measured using different IR techniques. Adapted from ref. 14 with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2008.

Identification of crystalline phases in calcium carbonate

Calcium carbonate is the most abundant natural carbonate. It amounts for 4% of Earth's crust16 and is the main component in chalk, a coral skeleton, and limestone.

IR spectroscopy provides information on the structure and properties of CaCO3 polymorphs,17–19 as displayed in Fig. 2.18 The relative intensities of the ν1 (∼1100 cm−1) and ν4 (∼700 cm−1) and the splitting of the ν4 and ν3 (1400–1500 cm−1) can be used to identify the varieties (amorphous CaCO3, vaterite, aragonite or calcite), especially with noticeable low intensity of the ν1 vibration band for calcite.


image file: d5cp02197a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 IR spectra of (A) amorphous CaCO3, (B) vaterite, (C) aragonite, and (D) calcite. Adapted from ref. 18 with permission from Scandinavian Society of Chemistry, copyright 1991.

In the near-IR, several absorption bands are present due to overtones and combinations of the fundamental bands. The spectral region between 3920 and 28[thin space (1/6-em)]600 cm−1 (Fig. 3) was used to identify and distinguish calcite, aragonite and dolomite using seven characteristic bands for carbonates in the range of 3900–6250 cm−1,20 with major bands at 4000 cm−1 (ref. 21) and 4250–4350 cm−1.13,21


image file: d5cp02197a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Vis-NIR reflectance spectra of CaCO3 minerals. Adapted from ref. 20 with permission from Mineralogical Society of America, copyright 1986.

Spectral features in the near IR and higher end of the MIR were used to determine carbonate content in arid soil samples.22 However, the PLSR (partial least-squares regression) efficiency of the method was found to be only 52% due to the overlapping of other soil components (illite and chlorite) with similar spectral features. The accuracy would have been improved by extending the measurement range to lower frequency MIR and FIR.

Similarly, the spectral range 28[thin space (1/6-em)]600–2000 cm−1 was used to detect anhydrous carbonate minerals using bands at ∼4350, 4000, 2940, 2560 and 2130 cm−1 (Fig. 4).21 In addition, water related spectral features were detected at 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000, 8330, 7140–6670, 5260, and 3570 cm−1. However, some typical characteristic carbonate IR bands were shifted, weak or absent in the case of hydrous carbonates and these minerals may be difficult to identify or distinguish from other hydrous minerals such as sulphates or chlorides.


image file: d5cp02197a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 NIR reflectance spectra (at 2000–28[thin space (1/6-em)]571 cm−1) of anhydrous carbonates: calcite, magnesite, siderite, and nahcolite. Adapted from ref. 21 with permission from Elsevier B. V., copyright 2015.

Using IR to monitor stability and phase change kinetics

Amorphous CaCO3 (ACC) is a thermodynamically unstable phase, and various parameters influence its transformation into CaCO3 crystalline phases.11 These parameters include impurities, pH and temperature. However, the amorphous phase can be stabilized at low particle sizes (<100 nm), using surfactants, or when contained in overbased (highly alkaline) detergent additives. An example is presented in Fig. 5 (ref. 23) where the amorphous phase was synthesized and stabilized by AOT (dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate). However, heating to 70 °C, calcite and vaterite were obtained depending on the heating ramp. CaCO3 polymorphs (including ACC) were also sometimes used as additives for lubricants and grease.11
image file: d5cp02197a-f5.tif
Fig. 5 IR spectra of (a) AOT-ACC, (b) calcite (heating ramp = 10 °C min−1), and (c) vaterite (ramp = 1 °C min−1). Adapted with permission from ref. 23 with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2013.

ACC transformation into calcite (via thermal treatment and by exposure to water at RT) was monitored by IR, XRD and TGA.24 Heating ACC resulted in the removal of adsorbed water above 100 °C with the formation of calcite at 270–400 °C. Similarly, exposure to a water/ethanol solution resulted in the crystallization of ACC. However, the product varied depending on the amount of water and the duration of exposure. Small water amount and/or short exposure time led to the formation of aragonite and/or vaterite, while more water and/or prolonged exposure led to the formation of calcite. The authors studied the influence of adding anionic polyelectrolytes, mimicking soluble proteins for inhibition of crystallization.

Similarly, the transformation of ACC to calcite was shown, using IR monitoring, to proceed via vaterite as a transition state.25 A two-step mechanism was suggested starting with the formation of vaterite particles followed by a much slower step of redissolution and precipitation into calcite. Fig. 6 shows the XRD patterns corresponding to each step as well as the IR spectra of the initial and final materials.


image file: d5cp02197a-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Infrared spectra of ACC and calcite (top) showing the change in water content from the amorphous hydrated precursor to the non-hydrated crystalline calcium carbonate phases. ‘A’ and ‘F’ represent the same samples shown in the XRD patterns (bottom) of solids collected at different elapsed times during the off-line experiments, showing ACC, vaterite and calcite. Adapted from ref. 25 with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2011.

IR was used to study naturally occurring spicules, skeletal elements in marine animals consisting of stable ACC entirely (in the ascidian Pyura pachydermatina) or of a composite of ACC and calcite (in the sponge Clathrina) (Fig. 7). In both cases, the presence of ACC was associated with proteins rich in glutamic acid (and/or glutamine), serine, glycine and polysaccharides,26 while calcite was associated with proteins rich in aspartic acid (and/or asparagine).


image file: d5cp02197a-f7.tif
Fig. 7 IR spectra of calcium carbonates from (a) geological calcite, (b) separated calcitic cores from the Clathrina spicules, (c) intact Clathrina spicules (note the atypical broadening of the calcitic peaks and the additional absorption at 1080 cm−1), (d) P.pachydermaha spicules, and (e) synthetic amorphous CaCO3 grown in the presence of the macromolecules extracted from the amorphous layer of Clathrina spicules. Adapted from ref. 26 with permission from Wiley Online Library, copyright 1996.

Aragonite and vaterite transformation by heating into the more stable phase calcite was followed by IR spectroscopy.19,27 The least stable phase vaterite was first prepared and its transformation into the other two phases was controlled. These transformations were clearly demonstrated by the significant changes in IR spectra at 650–1200 cm−1 (Fig. 8).


image file: d5cp02197a-f8.tif
Fig. 8 FTIR spectra (650–1200 cm−1) of (a) the vaterite sample, and when it was refluxed in distilled water for (b) 30 min, (c) 60 min, and (d) 75 min. Adapted from ref. 27 with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2010.

Identification of carbonate composition: hydration of magnesium carbonate

The compositions and structure of several hydrous magnesium carbonates were studied using various techniques and IR spectroscopy which provided significant information.28 Combining IR data published by several groups, a relationship was established between the infrared band frequencies and the lengths of H-bonds of various hydrated solids (including carbonates) (Fig. 9).28 Moreover, Fig. 10 (ref. 28) shows FTIR spectra of three hydrated magnesium carbonate minerals where the bands due to structural hydrogen bonds varied significantly depending on the mineral structure.
image file: d5cp02197a-f9.tif
Fig. 9 Relationship between the O–H frequency (ν) and O–H⋯O distance in H-bonds (RO–H⋯O); where ν0 = 3756 cm−1 on the Y-axis. Adapted from ref. 28 with permission from Mineralogical Society of America, copyright 1971.

image file: d5cp02197a-f10.tif
Fig. 10 Spectra of the hydrous magnesium carbonate minerals in the near infrared. Adapted from ref. 28 with permission from Mineralogical Society of America, copyright 1971.

IR studies of adsorbed species

The interaction of solid carbonates with small molecules and organic compounds is important for several concerns. Organic compounds govern the crystallization of biogenic carbonates in shells and marine organisms. In the field of oil extraction, understanding the way hydrocarbons and naphtha derivatives are adsorbed on carbonates is the key to extracting the maximum amount of oil from limestone deposits. Organics and probe molecules can also be adsorbed on the surface of solid carbonates for understanding surface sites on possible catalysts or on materials for sorption purposes.

Adsorption sites on carbonates

Adsorption sites vary depending on the type of molecule. Cationic metal sites are expected to be the preferential adsorption sites for most molecules such as CO,1 H2O1 and HCs.3–5 Carbonate groups, rather than the cations, are reported to be the preferential adsorption sites for CO2.2 Adsorbed water also leads to the formation of a surface intermediate Ca(OH)HCO31,29,30 where SO2 adsorbs on the hydrogen carbonate group, whereas CO2 and inorganic acids adsorb on –OH groups.

Co-adsorption with water was found to strengthen CO adsorption on some solids and red-shift its absorption band31 and similarly CO2 adsorption on carbonate was enhanced due to adsorbed water.29 Several adsorption models also explained the relationship between heats of adsorption, temperature and coverage. Temkin's model32,33 suggests that heat of adsorption is inversely proportionally to coverage, and coverage is inversely proportional to temperature with a plateau of full coverage at relatively low temperatures.

Adsorption of CO

CO adsorbed on calcite yielded an IR absorption band at 2173–2176 cm−1 at a CO coverage of 2–0 L (Fig. 11). This indicates the rather weak adsorption, considering that gaseous CO absorption bands are located at 2114 and 2176 cm−1 (rotovibrational P and R branches, respectively). CO adsorption occurs over Ca cations.34–36 Further infrared investigation of other carbonate minerals and different adsorption conditions is lacking.
image file: d5cp02197a-f11.tif
Fig. 11 IRRAS spectra with p-polarized light for CO adsorbed on the calcite (10.4) surface at 62 K with increasing exposures (0–2 L). Adapted from ref. 34 with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2021.

The heat of adsorption and the vibrational spectrum were satisfactorily reproduced by DFT calculations for CO on calcite, with 2177 cm−1 (theoretically) for 2175 cm−1 (measured) at a coverage of 0.5 ML.34

Adsorption of CO2

CO2 methanation over Ni/dolomite was followed by in situ and operando DRIFTS and was found to proceed via CO2 adsorption followed by the formation of formates, resulting finally in the formation of CH4 and H2O and not CO (Fig. 12-top).37 Formates were observed after heating to 300 °C onwards as evidenced by the bands at 1393, 1484, 1524 cm−1 (Fig. 12 bottom). At 400 °C, a new band was detected at 1107 cm−1 and was ascribed to the formation of the methoxy group and an increased activity. At 500 °C, the intense carbonate ν3 band at ∼1440 cm−1 disappeared due to thermal decomposition.
image file: d5cp02197a-f12.tif
Fig. 12 Operando CO2 methanation at 400 °C on Ni/dolomite: (Top) evolution of mass spectroscopy signal with reaction time. (Bottom) In situ DRIFT spectra as a function of catalyst temperature. Adapted from ref. 37 with permission from Elsevier B. V., copyright 2024.

CO2 was similarly found by FTIR to adsorb over hydrotalcite based catalysts during CO2 methanation38 or during surface activation by plasma glow discharge.39 IR absorption bands of several carbonate species were detected upon introducing CO2 over the hydrotalcite based catalyst (Fig. 13).


image file: d5cp02197a-f13.tif
Fig. 13 (a) Infrared spectra of CO2 adsorbed on the Ni-hydrotalcite derived catalyst and (b) possible species appeared in the CO2 adsorption experiment. Adapted from ref. 38 with permission from Elsevier B. V., copyright 2023.

CO2 adsorption was reported (without infrared data) to be positively affected by humidity, and H2O leads to the formation of hydrogen carbonate species where CO2 is adsorbed through –OH groups. Hydrogen carbonate was also formed during CO2 adsorption over oxides depending on surface hydroxylation.7

CO2 adsorption and reactivity were studied on several carbonate minerals and under different adsorption conditions including the presence of co-adsorbents. Adsorption sites and band positions were identified. Yet, FTIR studies are not abundant, and further works could bring about more insights.

As a matter of fact, CO2 and CO adsorption represent a major carbon capture and storage (CCS) methodology which aims at reducing greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Yet, this approach was sparingly followed by FTIR measurement in the literature reports despite its significance.

In this context, samples from naturally occurring carbonate reservoirs were reported to be efficient for CO2 storage. For instance, CO2-saturated brine was transported through the core sample and lead to changes in the permeability and porosity by creating conductive flow channels enhancing the rock's storage capacity.40,41 Moreover, industrial projects were operated by applying CO2 injections into carbonate rock reservoirs worldwide,42,43 and indeed reported CO2 storage efficiency.

On the other hand, over other CCS materials such as metal oxides,7 Mg minerals44 and cementitious materials,45–47 upon adsorption of carbon oxides, carbonate formation was observed which in turn took part in further adsorption. Moreover, an electrochemical process was developed and efficiently capture CO2 and form various carbonate salts48 where the carbonate structure was evidenced by FTIR and XRD. This process represents a simulation of naturally occurring carbonate formation in sea water by the reaction of dissolved CO2 with metal ions.

Adsorption of H2O

Water adsorption on CaCO3 forms a surface hydrogen carbonate species.30 Consequently, CO2 and HNO3 are adsorbed through the –OH groups, whereas SO2 is adsorbed via the hydrogen carbonate groups. This adsorption mechanism is consistent with a positive effect of H2O on CO2 adsorption on calcite.29 In contrast, surface solvation (by H2O) had a negative effect on the adsorption of aromatic hydrocarbons on calcite.49 Fig. 14 (ref. 30) shows the evolution of ATR spectra of CaCO3 during the exposure to a range of relative humidity. Increasing humidity induced an increased intensity for the IR bands due to adsorbed water around 1640 and 3000–3700 cm−1.
image file: d5cp02197a-f14.tif
Fig. 14 Evolution of ATR-FTIR spectra during water adsorption on calcium carbonate as a function of relative humidity from 10.6 to 95.3% RH (10.6, 20.2, 29.8, 41.6, 50.1, 55.8, 60.1, 65.6, 70.7, 77.3, 81.5 and 95.3% RH). Inset: the ATR-FTIR spectrum of calcium carbonate under dry conditions (<5% RH). Adapted from ref. 30 with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2005.

Over hydrotalcites,1 H2O adsorption similarly leads to the formation of hydrogen carbonate and to the liberation of CO2. This is accompanied by the formation of –OH groups detected by IR at 1490 and 3500 cm−1 (Fig. 15) and by the loss of carbonyl bond absorption bands at 1340 and 1570 cm−1. Water is suggested to adsorb on cationic metal sites. The formation of hydrogen carbonates was also observed29 as mentioned before.


image file: d5cp02197a-f15.tif
Fig. 15 IR spectra of hydrotalcite after (a) adsorption of H2O at 400 °C, (b) desorption of H2O at 400 °C with N2 and (c) adsorption of CO2 at 400 °C after desorption with H2O and N2. The equation shows H2O adsorption and CO2 liberation. Adapted from ref. 1 with permission from Elsevier B. V., copyright 2018.

Although there are few reports on H2O adsorption on carbonates, valuable information is available about adsorption sites and reactivity. These works also demonstrated the positive effect of humidity on CO2 adsorption and the negative effect of water on the adsorption of aromatic hydrocarbons.

Adsorption of hydrocarbons and functional molecules

The infrared spectrum of adsorbed probe molecules gives key information on surface sites and possible chemical reactions on the surface, for example with aromatics which are important for oil extraction purposes. Characteristic bands for the probe molecule are shifted upon adsorption, and more for the first monolayer than for the subsequent layers. An example of adsorbed benzene on calcite is shown in Fig. 16, where liquid benzene displayed a characteristic band at 667 cm−1 whereas it was shifted to 680 cm−1 in the case of a monolayer adsorbed on calcite and to 673 cm−1 in the case for extended adsorption layers.
image file: d5cp02197a-f16.tif
Fig. 16 [Left] IR spectra at 400–4000 cm−1 of (a) calcite, (b) benzene, and (c) benzene on calcite. [Right] Expanded view of 640–770 cm−1. L: liquid, E: extended adsorption layers, I: first adsorption layer. Adapted from ref. 50 with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2015.

Combining FTIR and DFT investigations proved useful to explain the interaction of calcite with four aromatic compounds.51 Ionic bonds were formed as Ca–O (between calcite and benzoic acid, with the formation of –OH groups via oxygen atoms of calcite) and Ca–N (between calcite and pyridine). Thiophene was adsorbed via O–H bond formation, whereas toluene showed no interaction.

Combined MD and DFT computed a stronger CO2 adsorption on CaCO3 polymorphs compared to CH4 adsorption,2 in agreement with the previously mentioned observations.52 Adsorption strengths of CH4 and CO2 were computed on vaterite, aragonite and calcite.2

Adsorption energies were also computed for benzene and hexane on calcite and dolomite5 and Ca cations were suggested as the most energetically favorable adsorption sites. This is consistent with some experimental studies4,52 but could easily be checked in detail with IR.

Tert-Butyl cyanide (TBC) was used as a probe for acidity on carbonated MgO (containing MgCO3).4 The cyanide group attached itself to Mg cations acts as weak Lewis acid sites. The ν(CN) absorption band is observed at 2234 cm−1 when TBC is only physisorbed, with no strong interaction. When the probe molecule is adsorbed on carbonate-free MgO, it is slightly shifted to 2240 cm−1. On the carbonated solid, the stronger interaction leads to an upward shift to 2262 cm−1, which indicates a stronger electron depletion on the cation because of the carbonate moiety (Fig. 17).


image file: d5cp02197a-f17.tif
Fig. 17 Tert-Butyl cyanide adsorption on carbonated MgO activated at 240 °C. The zoom-in region of 2300–2150 cm−1. The deconvolution results are shown in the inset. Adapted from ref. 4 with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2011.

CH4 desorption and recovery from carbonate natural gas reservoirs were improved by hot CO2 gas injections due to a favorable adsorption competition between CO2 and methane52 (Fig. 18). Detailed information on the molecular interactions by IR is, however, missing.


image file: d5cp02197a-f18.tif
Fig. 18 Evolution with temperature and pressure of the adsorption and desorption of CO2 (top) and CH4 (below) on carbonate rocks. Adapted from ref. 52 with permission from Elsevier B. V., copyright 2018.

With aminoacids, experimental information is clearly missing. It was computed that anhydrous ACC favored the adsorption of basic/neutral aminoacids, whereas co-adsorbed water improved the adsorption of acidic aminoacids.53 This study also suggested a faster diffusion of surface Ca2+ compared to the bulk ions. Experimental studies are needed to validate these findings.

Conclusions

Infrared spectroscopy has proven to be a versatile, facile and inexpensive technique for studying carbonate minerals. FTIR techniques offer valuable information on their structural features, phase transitions, and on the remarkable adsorption capacities. This review builds up on the use of FTIR for studying the carbonate structure and the differentiation between its polymorphs, monitoring dehydration and rehydration processes, aiming at studying the adsorption mechanisms and adsorption sites for several molecules such as CO, CO2, H2O, and several HCs on carbonates. Some authors reported theoretical modeling and validated the results via experimental data, but FTIR remains underutilized in the literature for studying the surface properties of carbonates. Therefore, future works should target integrating FTIR (alongside computational modeling) to deepen our understanding of these surface properties including the nature of surface acidity. This, in turn, would be beneficial for several processes where carbonates are heavily involved such as CO2 capture and storage and natural gas extraction.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptualization, bibliographic survey and design of the review. The original draft was written by Taha Elgayyar. Further modification and comments were performed by all authors. All authors approved of the final version of the review.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Data availability

Our article represents a mini-review article, and all the figures included are adapted with permission from the corresponding references.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the region Normandie for financial aid (project ADSOCARB in the frame of the Normandie Emergent scheme).

References

  1. K. Coenen, F. Gallucci, B. Mezari, E. Hensen and M. van Sint Annaland, J. CO2 Util., 2018, 24, 228–239 CrossRef CAS.
  2. M. Zhang, J. Li, J. Zhao, Y. Cui and X. Luo, ACS Omega, 2020, 5, 11369–11377 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. H. Wang, D. J. Grant, P. C. Burns and C. Na, Langmuir, 2015, 31, 5820–5826 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. J. Ni, F. C. Meunier, S. Robles-Manuel, J. Barrault and S. Valange, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 24931–24936 CrossRef CAS.
  5. V. A. Rigo, C. O. Metin, Q. P. Nguyen and C. R. Miranda, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 24538–24548 CrossRef CAS.
  6. S. Bordiga, C. Lamberti, F. Bonino, A. Travert and F. Thibault-Starzyk, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 7262–7341 RSC.
  7. G. Busca and V. Lorenzelli, Mater. Chem., 1982, 7, 89–126 CrossRef CAS.
  8. G. Herzberg, Molecular spectra and molecular structure. II, Infrared and Raman spectra of polyatomic molecules, D. Van Nostrand Company, 1956 Search PubMed.
  9. G. C. Jones and B. Jackson, Infrared Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Minerals, 1993 Search PubMed.
  10. C. E. Weir and E. R. Lippincott, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Sect. Phys. Chem., 1961, 65A, 173 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. V. N. Bakunin, D. R. Aleksanyan and Y. N. Bakunina, Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 2022, 95, 461–471 CrossRef CAS.
  12. R. C. H. Elderfield, Am. Mineral., 1971, 56, 1600–1606 Search PubMed.
  13. R. N. Clark, T. V. V. King, M. Klejwa, G. A. Swayze and N. Vergo, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 1990, 95, 12653–12680 CrossRef.
  14. E. Roedel, A. Urakawa, S. Kureti and A. Baiker, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2008, 10, 6190 RSC.
  15. A. Bertoluzza, P. Monti, M. A. Morelli and M. A. Battaglia, J. Mol. Struct., 1981, 73, 19–29 CrossRef CAS.
  16. W. Sekkal and A. Zaoui, Sci. Rep., 2013, 3, 1–10 Search PubMed.
  17. L. Brečević and A. E. Nielsen, J. Cryst. Growth, 1989, 98, 504–510 CrossRef.
  18. F. A. Andersen and L. Brečević, Acta Chem. Scand., 1991, 45, 1018–1024 CrossRef CAS.
  19. J. Perić, M. Vučak, R. Krstulović, L. Brečević and D. Kralj, Thermochim. Acta, 1996, 277, 175–186 CrossRef.
  20. S. J. Gaffey, Am. Mineral., 1986, 71, 151–162 CAS.
  21. P. L. Harner and M. S. Gilmore, Icarus, 2015, 250, 204–214 CrossRef CAS.
  22. F. Khayamim, J. Wetterlind, H. Khademi, A. H. J. Robertson, A. F. Cano and B. Stenberg, J. Infrared Spectrosc., 2015, 23, 155–165 CrossRef CAS.
  23. E. H. Noel, Y.-Y. Kim, J. M. Charnock and F. C. Meldrum, CrystEngComm, 2013, 15, 697–705 RSC.
  24. X.-R. Xu, A.-H. Cai, R. Liu, H.-H. Pan, R.-K. Tang and K. Cho, J. Cryst. Growth, 2008, 310, 3779–3787 CrossRef CAS.
  25. J. D. Rodriguez-Blanco, S. Shaw and L. G. Benning, Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 265–271 RSC.
  26. J. Aizenberg, L. Addadi, S. Weiner and G. Lambert, Adv. Mater., 1996, 8, 222–226 CrossRef CAS.
  27. A. Sarkar and S. Mahapatra, Cryst. Growth Des., 2010, 10, 2129–2135 CrossRef CAS.
  28. W. B. White, Am. Mineral., 1971, 56, 46–53 CAS.
  29. C. Santschi and M. J. Rossi, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2006, 110, 6789–6802 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. H. A. Al-Hosney and V. H. Grassian, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2005, 7, 1266–1276 RSC.
  31. S. D. Ebbesen, B. L. Mojet and L. Lefferts, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, 641–649 RSC.
  32. O. Dulaurent and D. Bianchi, Appl. Catal., A, 2000, 196, 271–280 CrossRef CAS.
  33. O. Dulaurent, M. Nawdali, A. Bourane and D. Bianchi, Appl. Catal., A, 2000, 201, 271–279 CrossRef CAS.
  34. T. M. Hafshejani, W. Wang, J. Heggemann, A. Nefedov, S. Heissler, Y. Wang, P. Rahe, P. Thissen and C. Wöll, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2021, 23, 7696–7702 RSC.
  35. G. Blyholder, J. Phys. Chem., 1964, 68, 2772–2778 CrossRef CAS.
  36. J. Heggemann, Y. S. Ranawat, O. Krejčí, A. S. Foster and P. Rahe, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2023, 14, 1983–1989 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. M. Canon-Alvarado, C. Blanco and C. Daza, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2024, 12, 112224 CrossRef CAS.
  38. M. Nguyen-Quang, F. Azzolina-Jury, F. Thibault-Starzyk, A. Travert, M. Ziąbka, B. Samojeden, M. Motak and P. Da Costa, Appl. Mater. Today, 2023, 32, 1–15 Search PubMed.
  39. R. Dębek, D. Wierzbicki, M. Motak, M. E. Galvez, P. Da Costa and F. Azzolina-Jury, Plasma Sci. Technol., 2019, 21, 045503 CrossRef.
  40. L. Luquot and P. Gouze, Chem. Geol., 2009, 265, 148–159 CrossRef CAS.
  41. Y. Yang, Y. Li, J. Yao, S. Iglauer, L. Luqot, K. Zhang, H. Sun, L. Zhang, W. Song and Z. Wang, Water Resour. Res., 2020, 56, 1–22 Search PubMed.
  42. M. Barbier, Y. Hamon, J.-P. Callot, M. Floquet and J.-M. Daniel, Mar. Pet. Geol., 2012, 29, 50–67 CrossRef.
  43. D. Civile, M. Zecchin, E. Forlin, F. Donda, V. Volpi, B. Merson and S. Persoglia, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 2013, 19, 101–116 CrossRef CAS.
  44. H. S. Santos, H. Nguyen, F. Venâncio, D. Ramteke, R. Zevenhoven and P. Kinnunen, Inorg. Chem. Front., 2023, 10, 2507–2546 RSC.
  45. A. Mahmood, A. Ibuk, M. Vogel, C. Neuhaus, F. Dehn and P. Thissen, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2023, 11, 13002–13012 CrossRef CAS.
  46. N. Giraudo and P. Thissen, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2016, 4, 3985–3994 CrossRef CAS.
  47. M. Izadifar, C. Natzeck, K. Emmerich, P. G. Weidler, S. Gohery, C. Burvill and P. Thissen, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2022, 126, 12405–12412 CrossRef CAS.
  48. O. Oloye and A. P. O’Mullane, ChemSusChem, 2021, 14, 1767–1775 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  49. A. Budi, S. L. S. Stipp and M. P. Andersson, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20, 7140–7147 RSC.
  50. H. Wang, D. J. Grant, P. C. Burns and C. Na, Langmuir, 2015, 31, 5820–5826 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  51. R. Chai, Y. Liu, Q. Liu and J. Xin, Colloids Surf., A, 2021, 612, 1–13 CrossRef.
  52. M. Eliebid, M. Mahmoud, R. Shawabkeh, S. Elkatatny and I. A. Hussein, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2018, 55, 575–584 CrossRef CAS.
  53. R. Innocenti Malini, A. R. Finney, S. A. Hall, C. L. Freeman and J. H. Harding, Cryst. Growth Des., 2017, 17, 5811–5822 CrossRef CAS.

This journal is © the Owner Societies 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.