C. Richard A.
Catlow
*abc,
Peter
Wells
*cde and
Diego
Gianolio
*e
aDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon St., London WC1H 0AJ, UK. E-mail: c.r.a.catlow@ucl.ac.uk
bSchool of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
cUK Catalysis Hub, Research Complex at Harwell, Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0FA, UK
dSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. E-mail: ppwells@soton.ac.uk
eDiamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, UK. E-mail: diego.gianoloio@diamond.ac.uk
Catalytic science has exploited SR since the early days of the field in the 1970s and ‘80s. Most early work employed X-ray spectroscopy, in particular the ability of X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS) to provide element specific local structural information, which as such is able to provide unique information on active site structures. Over the last decade, the use of XAFS within the field has moved beyond the preserve of specialist groups to become an essential tool in characterising advanced functional materials. The wealth of XAFS based studies within this themed issue provides demonstrable evidence of this burgeoning user community, which leads us to two important questions: (i) what next for XAFS studies within catalytic science, and (ii) how can other SR methods use this experience to develop further?
Regarding XAFS, there are many emerging technological developments. The advances in synchrotron lattice, optics and detectors over recent years have led to improved beam brilliance, and spatial and temporal resolution. These improvements have resulted in higher selectivity and sensitivity of the technique. Quick EXAFS scanning has been particularly beneficial for the study of reactions such as photocatalysis and electrochemistry. The smaller beam spot has opened the possibility of sampling heterogeneous materials in different points, for example highlighting differences in the reaction under study in different points of the catalytic bed. The higher flux provided by the new 4th generation synchrotrons will also open new possibilities for a more extensive use of photon-hungry techniques such as X-ray emission spectroscopies, reducing the measurement times and therefore allowing in situ experiments that are still challenging. X-ray Raman is another rapidly advancing method that will also benefit from the higher brilliance and will allow the use of hard X-rays to measure soft edges, overcoming the problems of strong absorption from the sample environment, windows and liquid media, and offering extended capabilities for in situ characterisation of homogeneous catalysts and the study of electrochemistry/batteries. Elsewhere, as demand for conventional and advanced XAFS spectroscopy increases further, there will be changes in the way measurements are performed. There have been significant advances in sample automation and lab-based instruments, which will be imperative for the future as demand continues to increase.
SR methods are not limited to XAFS, a good example being High Resolution X-Ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD), which when coupled with Rietveld refinement techniques enables the determination of high quality crystal structures for complex catalytic systems, especially microporous materials. The current themed issue again provides good illustrations of the role of XRPD in the field. The recent rise of the X-ray pair distribution function (XPDF) method has provided a missing link between XRD and XAS and helped in the combined refinement of datasets, therefore building a more thorough knowledge of the materials investigated. The development of microcrystalline, single crystal diffraction techniques has also played a significant role in the structural chemistry of microporous catalysts.
Other more recent developments include the growth of tomographic imaging techniques and the use of SR based infra-red spectroscopy, and the possibility of running ambient pressure XPS experiments that allow surface sensitive experiments on catalysts under in situ conditions at soft edges. It is clear that these methods can benefit from the experience of other techniques; in particular, the use of shared access methods has revolutionised their uptake by new users – and for different chemistry – as well as providing a focal point at which to nurture the community. Moreover, the technical developments in synchrotron machines and techniques have been enhanced by the parallel growth of theory and data analysis methods such as wavelet transform, neural networks and machine learning applied to SR data. These upgrades provide better tools for the interpretation of the data collected and help the user community to gain a deeper understanding of the systems studied.
The field is developing rapidly and an even greater impact of synchrotron based techniques on catalytic science can be expected in the future. We hope that this themed issue gives a good illustration of the current range of catalytic science enabled by these exceptional radiation sources, while pointing to the future possibilities.
This journal is © the Owner Societies 2020 |