Phosphorene-quantum-dot-interspersed few-layered MoS2 hybrids as efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts for hydrogen and oxygen evolution

Ranjith Prasannachandran , T. V. Vineesh , M. B. Lithin , R. Nandakishore and M. M. Shaijumon *
School of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Maruthamala PO, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695551, India. E-mail: shaiju@iisertvm.ac.in

Received 27th April 2020 , Accepted 15th June 2020

First published on 2nd July 2020


Abstract

0-D/2-D hybrids made up of phosphorene quantum dot (PQD)-interspersed few-layered MoS2 nanosheets were demonstrated to be efficient electrocatalysts with remarkable bifunctional electrocatalytic activity for oxygen and hydrogen evolution in an alkaline medium. The excellent performance of the PQD/MoS2 hybrids was attributed to their unique morphology, which facilitated charge transfer, leading to improved HER and OER kinetics.


Black phosphorus, a unique two-dimensional material, has recently gained significant attention owing to its interesting physico-chemical properties that make it suitable in diverse applications including optoelectronics, photovoltaics, energy storage, sensing, and catalysis.1–4 With its tunable electronic properties, large surface area, ultra-thin nature, and structural tailorability, few-layered black phosphorus has recently been studied as a promising electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER).5–8 Several strategies including functionalization and surface engineering have been reported to improve its electrocatalytic activity in terms of overpotential, stability, etc. Recently we demonstrated enhanced electrocatalytic activity for functionalized phosphorene quantum dots, prepared using a single-step electrochemical exfoliation method, towards the OER in an alkaline medium.9 Making heterostructures of 2D materials is a promising strategy proposed to tailor their properties toward specific applications including energy storage and electro/photocatalysis.7,10–15 Recently, in-plane heterostructures of few-layered black phosphorus with dicobalt and dinickel phosphides have been shown to display improved electrocatalytic properties toward the HER and OER.16

The electrocatalysts for both the HER and OER have been recommended to be operated under the same pH range and also in very strong alkaline or acidic media so as to reduce the overpotentials for the purpose of achieving high efficiency for overall water splitting.17 Thus the realization of a practical and efficient water splitting device requires development of low-cost noble-metal-free electrocatalysts for both the HER and OER. Though there have been significant advances in the development of TMD-, phosphide-, nitride- and carbon-based electrocatalysts, materials that show bifunctionality for the HER and OER, which could thus be employed in reaction cells under the same pH and electrolyte conditions, still remain to be explored. For instance, while TMDs such as mono-/few-layered MoS2 exhibit exceptional electrocatalytic activity towards the HER in acidic media, close to that of commercial Pt/C, making such TMDs suitable for the same reaction with high efficiency in an alkaline medium or applicable as efficient OER catalysts is quite challenging. Hence there is an urgent need to develop strategies for fabricating hybrid bifunctional electrocatalysts, with engineered interfaces that allow for adsorption of hydrogen-containing and oxygen-containing intermediates, for the realization of economically viable water splitting devices. Herein, we report a simple one-step technique to obtain 0D/2D hybrids consisting of phosphorene quantum dot (PQD)-interspersed few-layered MoS2 nanosheets, under ambient conditions. The as-synthesized PQD/MoS2 hybrid exhibited remarkable bifunctional electrocatalytic activity with exceptional stability in an alkaline medium, with an overpotential of 1.60 V@10 mA cm−2 towards the OER and −0.6 V@10 mA cm−2 towards the HER. The results demonstrated the promising potential of the PQD/MoS2 hybrid to serve as technologically viable electrodes for the overall water splitting process.

We employed a single-step processing method to prepare 0D/2D hybrids of phosphorene quantum dots (PQDs) interspersed with few-layered MoS2 nanosheets, following an electrochemical route.18,19 In a typical process, bulk MoS2 and BP crystals mixed in a weight ratio of 5[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 were thoroughly ground using a mortar and pestle, and then pressed into a pellet and used as an anode in a custom-designed electrochemical cell with conducting substrate (FTO/Pt wire) as the cathode. A highly dispersed solution of PQD/MoS2 heterostructures was obtained when a 5 V DC potential was applied under ambient conditions for 6 h between the electrodes in an aqueous electrolyte composed of 0.1 wt% LiTFSI (Fig. 1A), as detailed in the Experimental section (ESI). The obtained light-greenish solution was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 15 min and the collected dispersion showed the presence of 0D/2D heterostructures, as confirmed from a UV-Vis absorption spectrum showing a sharp peak at a wavelength of 300 nm and corresponding to the characteristic absorption band of PQDs, and a broad peak at 610 nm and corresponding to that of few-layered MoS2 sheets (Fig. S1, ESI).18,20,21 Pumera and co-workers have earlier reported the electrochemical exfoliation of black phosphorus in aqueous Na2SO4.19 In our current work, aqueous LiTFSI was chosen as a better candidate—as the TFSI ions, being bigger, were expected to facilitate exfoliation by intercalating into the spacing between the weakly-held-together van der Waals layers of these materials, and in this location to then trigger the cleavage and exfoliation.


image file: d0cc03053h-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (A) Schematic showing the electrochemical synthesis of PQD/MoS2. (B) Low-resolution and (C) high-resolution TEM images of PQD/MoS2. Inset of (B) shows a histogram of the average particle size distribution of PQDs on MoS2 sheets. (D) HRTEM image of PQD/MoS2 with a PQD highlighted and revealing lattice fringes (interlayer spacing of 0.23 nm) on the MoS2 nanosheet. The inset of (D) shows an HRTEM image of a PQD with highly resolved lattice fringes. (E) HRTEM image of PQD/MoS2 showing the lattice fringes of MoS2 with an interlayer spacing of 0.32 nm. (F) Raman spectra of PQD/MoS2 heterostructures and their bulk counterparts.

The morphology of the heterostructures was examined by carrying out transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Inspection of the TEM image of PQD/MoS2, shown in Fig. 1B, revealed the presence of nearly monodisperse quantum dots that were well interspersed on ultra-thin sheets. Further characterization using high-resolution TEM (Fig. 1C–E and Fig. S2, ESI) revealed the MoS2 sheets to have dimensions of several hundred nanometers and the well interspersed PQDs to have average lateral dimensions of ∼3 nm (inset of Fig. 1B) with an average height of 3–4 nm (Fig. S3, ESI). Inspection of the acquired HRTEM image of the PQD particles revealed lattice fringes with interlayer spacings of 0.52 nm and 0.23 nm (Fig. 1D), corresponding to the (020) and (111) planes of the bulk black phosphorus crystal.4,22,23 Inspection of the acquired HRTEM image of the nanosheets clearly showed lattice fringes with an interplanar distance of 0.32 nm (Fig. 1E) and that corresponded to the (004) plane of the MoS2 sheets. This result confirmed the formation of the 0D/2D heterostructure, one held together purely based on electrostatic attraction.

A Raman spectrum recorded for the currently developed heterostructure sample showed characteristic Raman signals for both MoS2 and black phosphorus, clearly confirming the heterostructure formation (Fig. 1F). The peaks at 353.6 cm−1, 430 cm−1, and 458.2 cm−1 corresponded to the three vibrational modes of black phosphorus (A1g, B2g, and A2g, respectively).5,24–26 The Raman signatures for MoS2 were observed in the form of the characteristic peaks (E12g and A2g) observed at 378.5 cm−1 and 402.7 cm−1. The difference between the wavenumber of the E12g peak and that of the A2g peak was measured to be 24 cm−1, which confirmed the presence of exfoliated few-layer MoS2.5 The characteristic Raman peaks observed for PQDs and MoS2 showed a redshift from their pristine bulk counterparts, which might have been due to electron transfer at the PQD/MoS2 interface, as observed for other 2D heterostructures reported earlier.5 To further confirm the heterostructure formation based on elemental analysis, scanning transmission electron microscopy with electron energy loss spectroscopy mapping (STEM-EELS) was performed on the sample, as shown in Fig. S4 (ESI). The energy losses recorded from the sheet for the S L2,3 edge at ∼165 eV and the Mo M4,5 edge at ∼230 eV were attributed to, respectively, the excitation of the 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 electrons to unoccupied 3d states and the excitation of the 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 electrons to unoccupied 4d states in the MoS2.27 The presence of phosphorene particles on the MoS2 sheets was further confirmed by the observation of the P L2,3 edge.28 Control experiments were performed with bulk MoS2 and black phosphorus anodes separately under similar conditions to confirm the formation of MoS2 sheets and PQDs, respectively (Fig. S5, ESI). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were further taken to study the chemical composition of the material (Fig. S6, ESI). The XPS survey spectrum recorded for the heterostructure sample showed peaks corresponding to Mo, S, and P, as expected (Fig. S6A, ESI). The presence of adventitious C and O was also seen. The deconvoluted high-resolution Mo 3d spectra showed characteristic peaks at 236.3 eV and 233.2 eV, corresponding to Mo 3d3/2 and Mo 3d5/2 signatures, respectively (Fig. S6B, ESI). Slight shifts in the peaks compared to bulk MoS2 towards higher binding energy resulted from the oxidized edge of MoS2 sheets arising from the applied anodic potential in the aqueous medium.

A high-resolution deconvoluted XPS spectrum in the S 2p region showed signature S–O peaks, confirming a slight oxidation of MoS2 nanosheets (Fig. S6C, ESI). The deconvoluted high-resolution spectrum in the P 2p region showed two peaks (Fig. S6D, ESI), one observed at ∼135 eV and corresponding to highly oxidized PQDs, and the other peak at ∼130 eV and corresponding to the P–P bond of phosphorene. The 135 eV peak corresponding to the PxOy bond resulted from the anodic exfoliation process in the presence of an aqueous electrolyte.19,29 It should be noted that no peaks corresponding to Mo–P bonds were observed in the P 2p and Mo 3d XPS regions, clearly indicating purely electrostatic binding between the two species with the van der Waals force driving the formation of the PQD/MoS2 heterostructure. Owing to the unique morphology of the 0D/2D heterostructure that facilitated improved interfacial contact and electronic interaction, our major goal here was to explore the bifunctional electrocatalytic activity of PQD/MoS2 heterostructures as efficient OER and HER catalysts for the overall water splitting process. Mono-/few-layered black phosphorus upon functionalization and surface engineering through diverse strategies has been shown to exhibit improved OER activity. For instance, in one of our previous works, in situ-surface-functionalized PQDs with nitrogen-containing groups were shown to exhibit efficient and stable electrocatalytic activity for the OER.9 Mono-/few-layered MoS2 is a well-explored electrocatalyst exhibiting exceptional activity towards the HER in acidic media, but its HER performance in alkaline media is very poor, limiting its practical use for overall water splitting devices. We thus thought it would be interesting to investigate the HER and OER activities of PQD/MoS2 heterostructures in an alkaline medium, from a practical standpoint.

The OER activity of PQD/MoS2 heterostructures was evaluated in 0.1 M KOH, as were bulk MoS2, few-layered MoS2 sheets, bulk BP and PQDs for comparison. All of the potentials were converted to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) and iR compensation was applied while recording the data using a Bio-logic SAS VMP3 workstation. Fig. 2A shows the linear sweep voltammetry curves obtained for determining the OER activities of the various samples. While both bulk MoS2 and bulk BP showed poor OER performances, the heterostructure showed exceptional OER activity, with an overpotential of only 1.60 V at 10 mA cm−2, lower than the overpotentials of the other tested samples. The PQDs showed a slight enhancement in OER performance compared to bulk BP, which could be attributed to their increased quantity of edge sites. An OER catalyst is in general considered to be efficient if its overpotential and Tafel slope are low and its exchange current density is high. Apart from the Tafel slope, analyzing an impedance spectrum (EIS) also gives information regarding the rate-determining step, and hence regarding the OER kinetics of the catalyst. In an alkaline medium, oxygen evolution undergoes a multistep reaction process to convert OH to O2. The first step of an OER is an electron transfer process where the relevant Tafel slope has been shown to be 120 mV dec−1. In the second step, the Tafel slope can be either 60 mV dec−1 or 40 mV dec−1, depending on whether a chemical reaction or an electron–proton reaction is the rate-limiting step.30,31 The PQD/MoS2 heterostructures exhibited excellent OER activity with a low Tafel slope of 46 mV dec−1 (Fig. 2B), suggesting improved kinetics due to accumulation of electrons on the heterojunction for a faster electron–proton reaction. Furthermore, analysis of the Nyquist plots revealed an impedance of 46 Ohm for PQD/MoS2, much lower than those of the other samples (Fig. 2C), and revealing a lower charge-transfer resistance and faster faradaic process in the heterostructure material. Electrode stability is another key parameter, and the as-prepared PQD/MoS2 was found to be stable for more than 15 h at a potential of 1.65 V (Fig. 2D), indicating excellent durability of the material in alkaline medium. The overall OER performance of the PQD/MoS2 heterostructures was found to be on par with those of other recently reported bifunctional electrocatalysts (Table S1, ESI).


image file: d0cc03053h-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (A) LSVs acquired for determining the OER activities of various samples in 0.1 M KOH solutions at 1600 rpm. (B) Tafel plots of PQD/MoS2 and PQDs measured from the corresponding LSVs in (A). (C) Impedance spectra of PQD/MoS2 and of the other indicated samples. (D) Chrono-amperometric response of PQD/MoS2, indicating their long-term durability.

The HER activities of PQD/MoS2 and the other samples were evaluated in 0.1 M KOH under similar conditions (Fig. 3). Mono-/few-layered MoS2 has been extensively studied as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for the HER in acidic medium, and hence we thought it would be further interesting to investigate the HER activity of the heterostructure sample consisting of exfoliated MoS2 sheets, in an alkaline medium. In general, the formation of heterostructures or nanohybrids induces a negative electric field between dissimilar layers, which further enhances the adsorption of H+ onto the catalyst, a well-studied mechanism for MoS2/graphene nanohybrids.12 We had thought that electron injection from PQD to MoS2 would favor the stabilization of adsorbed H over the surface, and as a consequence would enhance the HER activity. Also, the heterogeneous atoms can give a close thermoneutral free energy (ΔG ∼ 0) for hydrogen evolution reaction.32 As evidenced from the LSV curves in Fig. 3A, PQD/MoS2 showed a much better HER activity than did bulk BP, PQDs, bulk MoS2, and the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets. PQD/MoS2 exhibited here an overpotential of ∼−0.6 V at 10 mA cm−2, much better than that of the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, a much lower Tafel slope, specifically 162 mV dec−1, was measured for PQD/MoS2 than for the other samples (Fig. 3B). A much smaller semicircle observed in the impedance plot (Fig. 3C) indicated improved charge-transfer kinetics for PQD/MoS2, which could be due to the faster electron transfer through the heterojunction. Such faster electron transfer would further result in enhanced coupling of an electron with H+ ions at the catalyst-electrolyte interface. The long-term stability of the heterostructure was also confirmed from the electrochemical amperometry measurements performed at a potential of −0.6 V vs. RHE for more than 15 h (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, the structural stability of the catalyst after electrocatalytic measurements was confirmed from Raman (Fig. S9, ESI) and XPS (Fig. S10, ESI) analyses.


image file: d0cc03053h-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (A) LSV curves acquired for determining the HER activities of various samples in 0.1 M KOH solutions at 1600 rpm. (B) Tafel plots obtained from the corresponding LSVs in (A). (C) Impedance spectra of samples. (D) Chrono-amperometric response of PQD/MoS2, revealing the long-term durability of the heterostructure.

In summary, we have shown a facile and one-step electrochemical approach to make 0D/2D hybrids of PQD/MoS2 under ambient conditions. As-prepared PQD/MoS2 exhibited remarkable bifunctional electrocatalytic activity towards the HER and OER in a 0.1 M KOH solution. The bifunctional catalyst also showed exceptional stability in an alkaline medium, with an overpotential of 1.60 V@10 mA cm−2 towards the OER and −0.6 V@10 mA cm−2 towards the HER with very low Tafel slopes. The enhanced electrocatalytic performance of MoS2/PQDs was attributed to its unique morphology, with monodisperse PQDs uniformly interspersed on few-layered MoS2 nanosheets, and with this morphology facilitating charge transfer and hence leading to improved HER and OER kinetics. The importance of design strategies for the development of 0D/2D hybrids to meet the requirements of both hydrogen and oxygen evolution electrocatalysts was highlighted using detailed electrochemical studies and the work thus brings us a step closer to the realization of a practical water splitting system.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Notes and references

  1. D. Hanlon, C. Backes, E. Doherty, C. S. Cucinotta, N. C. Berner, C. Boland, K. Lee, A. Harvey, P. Lynch and Z. Gholamvand, et al. , Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 8563 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. F. Xia, H. Wang and Y. Jia, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 4458 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. Z. Guo, H. Zhang, S. Lu, Z. Wang, S. Tang, J. Shao, Z. Sun, H. Xie, H. Wang and X.-F. Yu, et al. , Adv. Funct. Mater., 2015, 25, 7100 CrossRef.
  4. X. Ren, J. Zhou, X. Qi, Y. Liu, Z. Huang, Z. Li, Y. Ge, S. C. Dhanabalan, J. S. Ponraj and S. Wang, et al. , Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7, 1700396 CrossRef.
  5. R. He, J. Hua, A. Zhang, C. Wang, J. Peng, W. Chen and J. Zeng, Nano Lett., 2017, 17, 4311–4316 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. L. Shao, H. Sun, L. Miao, X. Chen, M. Han, J. Sun, S. Liu, L. Li, F. Cheng and J. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 2494–2499 RSC.
  7. Y. Lin, Y. Pan and J. Zhang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 7951–7956 CrossRef CAS.
  8. Y. Gan, X.-X. Xue, X.-X. Jiang, Z. Xu, K. Chen, J.-F. Yu and Y. Feng, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2019, 32, 25202 CrossRef PubMed.
  9. R. Prasannachandran, T. V. Vineesh, A. Anil, B. M. Krishna and M. M. Shaijumon, ACS Nano, 2018, 12, 11511–11519 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. Z. Yuan, J. Li, M. Yang, Z. Fang, J. Jian, D. Yu, X. Chen and L. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 4972–4979 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. T. Wu, S. Zhang, K. Bu, W. Zhao, Q. Bi, T. Lin, J. Huang, Y. Li and F. Huang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 22063–22069 RSC.
  12. J. Ye, W. Chen, S. Xu, Z. Yu and S. Hou, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 104925 RSC.
  13. Q. Liang, F. Shi, X. Xiao, X. Wu, K. Huang and S. Feng, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 2179–2183 CrossRef CAS.
  14. S. Bawari, N. M. Kaley, S. Pal, T. V. Vineesh, S. Ghosh, J. Mondal and T. N. Narayanan, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20, 15007–15014 RSC.
  15. J. Wang, D. Liu, H. Huang, N. Yang, B. Yu, M. Wen, X. Wang, P. K. Chu and X.-F. Yu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 2600–2604 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. Z.-Z. Luo, Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, H. T. Tan, Z. Li, A. Abutaha, X.-L. Wu, Q. Xiong, K. A. Khor and K. Hippalgaonkar, et al. , Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7, 1601285 CrossRef.
  17. Y. Yan, B. Y. Xia, B. Zhao and X. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 17587–17603 RSC.
  18. D. Gopalakrishnan, D. Damien, B. Li, H. Gullappalli, V. K. Pillai, P. M. Ajayan and M. M. Shaijumon, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 6293–6296 RSC.
  19. A. Ambrosi, Z. Sofer and M. Pumera, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 10443–10445 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. A. K. Mishra, K. V. Lakshmi and L. Huang, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5, 15718 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. Z. Guo, H. Zhang, S. Lu, Z. Wang, S. Tang, J. Shao, Z. Sun, H. Xie, H. Wang and X.-F. Yu, et al. , Adv. Funct. Mater., 2015, 25, 6996–7002 CrossRef CAS.
  22. Z. Guo, H. Zhang, S. Lu, Z. Wang, S. Tang, J. Shao, Z. Sun, H. Xie, H. Wang and X.-F. Yu, et al. , Adv. Funct. Mater., 2015, 25, 6996–7002 CrossRef CAS.
  23. X. Zhang, H. Xie, Z. Liu, C. Tan, Z. Luo, H. Li, J. Lin, L. Sun, W. Chen and Z. Xu, et al. , Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 127, 3724–3728 CrossRef.
  24. J. R. Brent, N. Savjani, E. A. Lewis, S. J. Haigh, D. J. Lewis and P. O’Brien, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 13338–13341 RSC.
  25. Z. Sun, H. Xie, S. Tang, X.-F. Yu, Z. Guo, J. Shao, H. Zhang, H. Huang, H. Wang and P. K. Chu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 127, 11688–11692 CrossRef.
  26. X. Zhang, H. Xie, Z. Liu, C. Tan, Z. Luo, H. Li, J. Lin, L. Sun, W. Chen and Z. Xu, et al. , Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 127, 3724–3728 CrossRef.
  27. D. Dahanayake, S. Gunasekara, V. Jayaweera, C. Sandaruwan, V. Karunarathne and G. A. J. Amaratunga, CrystEngComm, 2018, 20, 6482–6489 RSC.
  28. X. Liu, J. D. Wood, K.-S. Chen, E. Cho and M. C. Hersam, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2015, 6, 773–778 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. C. C. Mayorga-Martinez, N. Mohamad Latiff, A. Y. S. Eng, Z. Sofer and M. Pumera, Anal. Chem., 2016, 88, 10074–10079 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. J. O. Bockris, J. Chem. Phys., 1956, 24, 817–827 CrossRef CAS.
  31. N.-T. Suen, S.-F. Hung, Q. Quan, N. Zhang, Y.-J. Xu and H. M. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 337–365 RSC.
  32. Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, L. H. Li, T. Xing, Y. Chen, M. Jaroniec and S. Z. Qiao, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 5290–5296 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d0cc03053h

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020