Issue 4, 2020

Non-analyte signals and supervised learning to evaluate matrix effects and predict analyte recoveries in inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry

Abstract

A supervised data-driven methodology was used to evaluate matrix effect severity and the consequent analytical signal bias caused by easily ionizable elements (EIEs) in inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES). Eight different supervised machine learning models were trained on signals from nine plasma naturally-occurring species of Ar, H and O to predict analyte recoveries for Cd, Co, Cr and Pb. The Ar atomic line at 737.212 nm was then used to correct for analytical signal bias due to matrix effects caused by high concentrations of Ca and Na. Recoveries were accurately predicted for all analytes (R2 > 0.9) by optimized generalized linear models (GLMs), regularized GLMs and partial least squares (PLS) regression. Accuracy was improved by employing Ar or Y as internal standards (IS). Although Y outperformed Ar in Cd determinations, both species were comparable for Co, Cr and Pb. In this preliminary study, however, there was no significant accuracy improvement observed when utilizing the Ar 737.212 nm line at the discretion of machine learning models. Therefore, for the analytes and matrices evaluated here, this species should be simply used as an IS when optimized models predict absolute errors < 0.3 (30%). The methodology described in this study may be easily implemented in routine applications, as one simply needs to monitor non-analyte signals while performing external standard calibration (EC). Once a series of models are trained, instrument software can be programmed to monitor plasma native species in real time and alert the analyst to different levels of matrix effect severity. Based on analyte recovery predictions from the optimized models, the analyst can then choose between simple EC, internal standardization with the Ar 737.212 nm line, or a more robust matrix-matching strategy.

Graphical abstract: Non-analyte signals and supervised learning to evaluate matrix effects and predict analyte recoveries in inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Technical Note
Submitted
12 jan 2020
Accepted
25 feb 2020
First published
25 feb 2020

J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2020,35, 679-692

Non-analyte signals and supervised learning to evaluate matrix effects and predict analyte recoveries in inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry

J. A. Carter, J. T. Sloop, T. Harville, B. T. Jones and G. L. Donati, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2020, 35, 679 DOI: 10.1039/D0JA00007H

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements