A straightforward sequence to alkyl 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates starting from acylhydrazono esters and alkyl 2-aroyl-1-chlorocyclopropanecarboxylates

Zhimei Huang and Yuefa Gong*
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, People’s Republic of China. E-mail: gongyf@mail.hust.edu.cn

Received 21st January 2016 , Accepted 18th February 2016

First published on 22nd February 2016


Abstract

A highly regioselective domino reaction was developed between alkyl 2-aroyl-1-chlorocyclopropanecarboxylates 1 and acylhydrazono esters 2 in the presence of Cs2CO3 under mild basic conditions, which directly afforded 2,3,5-trifunctionalized pyrroles in good to excellent yields with the extrusion of benzamide. A plausible pathway was proposed involving 1,2-elimination, regioselective nucleophilic addition, the intramolecular Mannich reaction, and the removal of benzamide to rationalize the formation of the aromatic pyrrole system.


Introduction

Polysubstituted pyrrole as a core structure widely exists in many natural products,1 pharmaceuticals,2 and various functional materials.3 Among the pyrrole derivatives, 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates have many applications in various fields of medicinal and bioorganic chemistry, photochemistry, and materials science. For example, bis(oxazolinyl)pyrroles prepared easily from pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate were employed as bidentate ligands for Heck-type reactions.4 Some representative examples with this core structure are illustrated in Scheme 1. Chromopyrrolic acid (CPA) with the pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate core has been identified as a common intermediate in the biosynthesis of the antitumor indolocarbazoles rebeccamycin and staurosporine.5 Ningalin A and storniamide A, found in some marine natural products are the precursors of cytotoxic antitumor agents.6a Lycogarubin C, isolated from Lycogala epidendrum, was first identified as natural products in 1994.6b In addition, some amides and thioamides derived from 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates with unique complexation property were investigated as neutral anion receptors.7 Methyl 5-benzoyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate was recently employed to construct pyrrolyldipyrrin motif, which exists in several naturally occurring prodigiosin pigments.8
image file: c6ra01829g-s1.tif
Scheme 1 The important role of 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates.

As for the growing applications of 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates, several synthetic approaches have been established.9 Simple 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates without any substituents at C-3 and C-4 sites are usually prepared directly from pyrrole in multistep processes.10 Formation of N-substituted pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates was achieved through Paal–Knorr reaction of anilines with diethyl 2,5-dihydroxyhexa-2,4-dienedioate.11 Symmetric pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate derivatives can be synthesized via a titanium(IV)-mediated oxidative dimerization of 2-azidocarboxylic esters at low temperature.12 3,4-Disubstituted pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates were synthesized via reductive ring contraction of 1,2-diazines generated in azadiene Diels–Alder reactions.6b The mentioned approaches, however, still have limitations as for the tedious steps, low efficiency, use of transition metal or extreme conditions.

Our recent research interest focused on the chemistry of reactive cyclopropene derived from simple 1,2-elimination of 1-halocyclopropane. Rubin et al. has previously reported the formal substitution of halocyclopropanes with N-centered13 and O-centered14 nucleophiles through a cyclopropene pathway. In addition, Khlebnikov et al. has also reported the reaction of 2H-azirines with 1,2,4-tricarbonyl compounds to produce 2,3-dicarbonyl-pyrrole derivatives which can be used in synthesis of heterocyclyl pyrroles or pyrroles fused with heterocycles via metal catalyzed.15 In our lab, a kind of versatile reagents, alkyl 2-aroyl-1-chlorocyclopropane-carboxylates 1, prepared directly from alkyl dichloroacetates and enones in the presence of Cs2CO3,16 were proven to be useful in the synthesis of cyclic compounds. Their reactions with various donor–acceptor reagents like salicylaldimines, salicylic aldehydes, and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds provided efficient routes to construct chroman and functionalized fulvene skeletons, respectively.17 The reagents 1 also underwent smoothly transformation into 2-pyranones after treatment with N-centered nucleophiles like aliphatic amines.18 Inspired by the above observations, we anticipated that the reagents 1 could be employed to react with acylhydrazones, commonly useful 1,3-dipoles,19 to yield fused stained pyrazolidines. In fact, when the reaction of 1 with acylhydrazone 2 derived from ethyl glyoxylate was performed in the presence of base, the predominant formation of an unexpected dialkyl 3-aroyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate and benzamide were observed during the reaction. To our best knowledge, this is the first example concerned with direct synthesis of 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates starting from halocyclopropanes. The details for this work are described as follows.

Results and discussion

Initially, we conducted the reaction of ethyl 2-aroyl-1-chlorocyclopropanecarboxylates 1a with benzoylhydrazono esters 2a in presence of two equiv. of Cs2CO3 in THF at 80 °C. The reaction proceeded sluggishly to afford a new product in about 35% yield. The product isolated carefully from the mixture on a silica gel column was identified to be diethyl 3-benzoyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates 3aa rather than the expected [3 + 2] cycloaddition product pyrazolidine by spectroscopic means (ESI II).20 This interesting result encouraged us to investigate the reaction process in detail. Thus, the reaction between 1a and 2a was chosen as the model to optimize the reaction conditions including solvent, base and reaction temperature. All the results observed are listed in Table 1. Effect of the solvents on the reaction was first estimated (entries 1–8). Apparently, aprotic polar solvents such as DMF, DMSO and CH3CN are the appropriate reaction media (entries 3–5). Among them, the highest yield of 3aa was observed in CH3CN (entry 3). Both chlorinated solvent and nonpolar solvent such as 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) and toluene are not good choice for the reaction owing to the low yields (entries 6 and 7). In protic solvent like ethanol, only very little amount of 3aa was detected by TLC analysis (entry 8). In view of both the high yield and simple workup, CH3CN was chosen as the ideal solvent for the following reactions.
Table 1 Optimization of the reaction conditionsa

image file: c6ra01829g-u1.tif

Entry Base Solvent Time (h) Conversion (%) Yield% (3aa)b
a Reactions were carried out using 0.2 mmol of 1a, 0.2 mmol of 2a, and 0.4 mmol of base in 2.0 mL of dry solvent at 80 °C for the given time; conversion was based on the consumed 1a.b Isolated yield.c Conducted at 25 °C.d Conducted at 50 °C. Reactions were monitored by TLC analysis using silica gel 60 Å F-254 thin layer plates (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 4[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1).
1 Cs2CO3 THF 6 100 35
2 Cs2CO3 1,4-Dioxane 6 100 78
3 Cs2CO3 CH3CN 4 100 87
4 Cs2CO3 DMF 4 100 73
5 Cs2CO3 DMSO 4 100 76
6 Cs2CO3 DCE 6 70 30
7 Cs2CO3 Toluene 24 80 30
8 Cs2CO3 EtOH 24 100 <5
9 tBuOK CH3CN 4 90 <5
10 NaOH CH3CN 8 51 23
11 K3PO4 CH3CN 12 79 53
12 K2CO3 CH3CN 8 54 30
13 NaHCO3 CH3CN 12 36 <5
14 DBU CH3CN 1 100 61
15 DABCO CH3CN 12 45 24
16c Cs2CO3 CH3CN 12 100 30
17d Cs2CO3 CH3CN 8 100 61


Next, the role of various inorganic and organic bases were assessed under the above reaction conditions. The property of inorganic bases has a marked influence both on the reaction rate and on the product yield. Among t-BuOK, NaOH, K3PO4, K2CO3 and NaHCO3, K3PO4 possessing moderate base strength gave the highest yield, indicating clearly that neither the strong base nor the weak base favored the reaction (entries 9–13). A parallel experiment demonstrated that strong base like t-BuOK caused quick decomposition of substrate 1a within 1 hour, providing unidentifiable oligomers with high polarity. Similar effect of the organic base strength on the reaction was also observed (entries 14 and 15). The stronger base DBU can promote the reaction well, whereas the relatively weaker base DABCO (1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane) has a poorer ability to remove a molecule of HCl from 1 and caused the reaction proceed sluggishly, albeit with the extension of reaction time. In view of the product yield, Cs2CO3 was still the promising base because of its high reactivity in CH3CN. In addition, the reaction temperature has also a considerable effect on the reaction. The reaction mentioned above went slowly at room temperature to form a complicated mixture of products, and only about 30% yield of 4aa was isolated by column chromatography (entry 16). When the reaction temperature was elevated to 50 °C, the product yield was improved to a large extent (entry 17), but still lower than that observed at 80 °C.

With the optimized conditions in hand, we examined the scope of substrates and the limitation of this reaction. All the following reactions were performed in presence of 2.0 equiv. of Cs2CO3 in CH3CN at 80 °C under argon atmosphere, and the observed results are listed in Table 2. To our delight, substrates 1a–1k bearing various aroyl groups are adapted for the reaction, giving the products 3aa–3ka in satisfactory yields. Actually, the substrates with electron-donating 4-Me or 4-OMe groups on aromatic ring gave the products 3ba (ref. 21) or 3ca in 89% and 93% yields, respectively, which are slightly higher than that of 3aa (entries 2 and 3). The introduction of electron-withdrawing 4-Cl or 4-Br groups caused a slight decline in the yields of 3da or 3ea in comparison with 3aa (entries 3 and 4). Additionally, substrates 1f–1g with sterically hindered 4-biphenyl or 1-naphthyl groups on the carbonyl were also tolerated in this process, affording products 3fa–3ga in 78% and 88% yields, respectively (Table 2, entries 6 and 7). Similar result was also observed in the case of substrate 1h with a 2-thienyl group (entry 8). Comparing the yields of 3ea and 3ia, we realized that substituent position in benzene ring has little effect on the reaction (entry 5 vs. entry 9). In addition, the size of the ester group of substrates 1 has little effect on the reaction. In fact, both 1j with small methyl group and 1k with bulky t-butyl group afforded the desired products 3ja and 3ka in high yields, respectively, regardless of the big difference in steric hindrance (Table 2, entries 10 and 11).

Table 2 The reaction of various 1a–1k with 2aa

image file: c6ra01829g-u2.tif

Entry Substrate 1 (Ar, R) Substrate 2 Time (h) Product Yieldb (%)
a All the reactions were performed with 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), and Cs2CO3 (2.0 equiv.) in 2.0 mL of dry CH3CN at 80 °C.b Isolated yields.
1 1a (Ph, Et) 2a 4 3aa 87
2 1b (4-MeC6H4, Et) 2a 5 3ba 89
3 1c (4-anisyl, Et) 2a 6 3ca 93
4 1d (4-ClC6H4, Et) 2a 6 3da 82
5 1e (4-BrC6H4, Et) 2a 4 3ea 78
6 1f (4-PhC6H4, Et) 2a 4 3fa 78
7 1g (1-Naph, Et) 2a 4 3ga 88
8 1h (2-thienyl, Et) 2a 4 3ha 86
9 1i (2-BrC6H4, Et) 2a 4 3ia 82
10 1j (Ph, Me) 2a 4 3ja 80
11 1k (Ph, t-Bu) 2a 4 3ka 84


As a continuation of our research, we tried to expand the reagent scope to acylhydrazones derived from substituted phenylglyoxals for constructing other multi-functionalized pyrroles. Under the above optimal reaction conditions, we treated the reagent 2b prepared from phenylglyoxal with the substrate 1a. As a result, the reaction proceeded quickly to give the corresponding product 3ab in good yield within 1 hour (Table 3, entry 1). This finding allowed us to investigate the electronic property of acylhydrazones on the reaction. Several acylhydrazones 2c–2f bearing electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups were thus prepared and employed to react with the substrate 1a under the reaction conditions. All the reactions proceeded quickly, affording the corresponding pyrroles 3ac–3af with three carbonyl groups at its 2,3,5-positions in high yields (Table 3, entries 2–5). In the reaction with 2b, substituent effect of substrates 1 was also investigated in the same way (Table 3, entries 6–13). Obviously, although somewhat higher yields of the corresponding pyrrole derivatives were obtained in the cases of 1b and 1g, the influence of substituent group on benzene ring on the reaction was rather small.

Table 3 Scope of the reaction between 1a–1j and 2b–2fa

image file: c6ra01829g-u3.tif

Entry Substrate 1 (Ar) Reagent 2 (R) Time (h) Product Yieldb (%)
a All the reactions were performed with 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), and Cs2CO3 (2.0 equiv.) in 2.0 mL of dry CH3CN at 80 °C. The reaction was monitored by TCL analysis.b Isolated yields.
1 1a (Ph) 2b (H) 2 h 3ab 79
2 1a 2c (4-Me) 2 h 3ac 76
3 1a 2d (4-OMe) 2 h 3ad 82
4 1a 2e (4-Cl) 2 h 3ae 74
5 1a 2f (4-Br) 2 h 3af 73
6 1b (4-MeC6H4) 2b 2 h 3bb 81
7 1c (4-MeOC6H4) 2b 2 h 3cb 76
8 1d (4-ClC6H4) 2b 2 h 3db 76
9 1e (4-BrC6H4) 2b 2 h 3eb 73
10 1f (4-PhC6H4) 2b 2 h 3fb 61
11 1g (1-naphthyl) 2b 2 h 3gb 82
12 1h (2-thienyl) 2b 2 h 3hb 73
13 1i (2-BrC6H4) 2b 2 h 3ib 71


Based upon the above observations, we proposed a possible pathway to explain the formation of 2,3,5-trisubstituted pyrroles. As shown in Scheme 2, the reaction was initiated by simple 1,2-elimination of hydrogen chloride from the substrate 1, generating the highly reactive cyclopropene intermediate I. Then, a domino reaction pathway was followed through a continuous aza-Michael addition, nucleophilic addition to C[double bond, length as m-dash]N bond, and protonation to form the bicyclic compound II. The high regioselectivity for this process could be assigned to the preferential nucleophilic attack at alpha-site of cyclopropene I.20 The compound II was chemically unstable under basic conditions, and easily underwent the ring opening reaction to afford the intermediate III. In turn, an intramolecular nucleophilic substitution at nitrogen center would happen, which led to the breaking of N–N bond and the formation of the five-membered compound IV. Finally, one molecule of benzamide was quickly removed, leading to the thermodynamically stable aromatic pyrrole derivative 3. In fact, to confirm the formation of benzamide, the crude products for the reactions of 1a with 2a, 1c with 2a, and 1a with 2b, was carefully isolated by silica gel column chromatography, and the obtained benzamide was further characterized by 1H and 13C NMR (see ESI I). The yields for benzamide are 78%, 84% and 76% for the above mentioned reactions, respectively.


image file: c6ra01829g-s2.tif
Scheme 2 A proposed mechanism for the reaction between 1 and 2.

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed a direct synthetic strategy for important 3-aroyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates. This is a transition-metal free way to prepare the pyrrole derivatives. This highly regioselective reaction starting from easily available alkyl 2-aroyl-1-chlorocyclopropanecarboxylates and benzoylhydrazono esters proceeded through a continuous pathway involving 1,2-elimination, Michael addition, Mannich reaction, intramolecular nucleophilic substitution at nitrogen center, and aromatization via removal of benzamide under mild basic conditions without any expensive catalyst. This protocol provides highly functionalized pyrrole compounds that have potential applications in new material and drug discovery and development.

Experimental section

General information

All the solvents were dried over CaH2 or sodium and distilled prior to use. Reactions were monitored by TLC analysis using silica gel 60 Å F-254 thin layer plates under UV lamp. Flash column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 Å, 10–40 μm. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz NMR spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm from tetramethylsilane with the solvent resonance as the internal standard (CDCl3, δ = 7.26). Data are reported as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s: singlet, d: doublet, t: triplet, q: quartet, m: multiplet, br: broad), coupling constants (Hz) and integration. 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 101 MHz with complete proton decoupling. Chemical shifts are also reported in ppm from the tetramethylsilane with the solvent resonance as internal standard (CDCl3, δ = 77.0). IR spectra were recorded on an infrared spectrometer. Melting point was recorded on a melting point detector. HRMS was measured on a TOF-Q mass spectrometer equipped with an ESI source.

Typical procedure for the synthesis of diethyl 3-benzoyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3aa)

Into a solution of 1a (0.2 mmol) and 2a (0.2 mmol) in 2.0 mL of dry CH3CN was added Cs2CO3 (0.4 mmol), and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C. The reaction was followed by thin layer chromatography until all the substrate 1a disappeared. The mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to remove the solvent, then washed with 1 M HCl, and extracted with CH2Cl2 for three times, then the combined organic layer was washed with water for two times. Combined organic extracts were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (8[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) as the eluent to afford 55 mg of compound 3aa in 87% yield. Unless otherwise specified, all other products 3 were synthesized according to this typical procedure.

Diethyl 3-benzoyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3aa)

Oil liquid (55 mg, 87% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.24 (s, 1H), 7.88–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.58 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.09 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.39 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.9, 160.0, 159.7, 138.2, 133.1, 129.6, 128.4, 128.3, 125.5, 124.7, 116.6, 61.5, 61.4, 14.3, 13.5; IR (KBr): 3259, 3063, 2983, 2933, 1719, 1662, 1560, 1463, 1368, 1266, 1207, 1092, 1021, 920, 722 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C17H17NaNO5 [M + Na]+ 338.1005, found 338.0996.

Diethyl 3-(4-methylbenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3ba)

Yellow solid (59 mg, 90% yield); mp 121–125 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.13 (s, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.10 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 1.38 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.97 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.6, 160.1, 159.7, 143.9, 135.7, 129.8, 129.0, 128.7, 125.4, 124.6, 116.5, 61.4, 61.4, 21.7, 14.3, 13.5. IR (KBr): 3240, 3126, 2987, 1724, 1705, 1654, 1465, 1267, 1092, 1020, 787, 755 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z C18H19NaNO5 [M + Na]+ 352.1161, found 352.1157.

Diethyl 3-(4-methoxybenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3ca)

Yield solid (64 mg, 93% yield); mp 86–87 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.20 (s, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.39 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.13 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 1.38 (dd, J = 7.4, 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (td, J = 7.1, 1.2 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.6, 163.7, 160.1, 159.7, 131.9, 131.1, 128.9, 125.4, 124.4, 116.3, 113.6, 61.4, 61.4, 55.5, 14.3, 13.6. IR (KBr): 3263, 1719, 1656, 1597, 1265, 1018, 767 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C18H19NaNO6 [M + Na]+ 368.1110, found 368.1104.

Diethyl 3-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3da)

Yellow solid (57 mg, yield 82%); mp 114–115 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.16 (d, J = 24.1 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.07 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.14 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (td, J = 7.1, 2.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.0, 159.1, 158.7, 136.2, 130.9, 127.2, 124.8, 123.9, 115.8, 60.9, 60.8, 13.6, 12.9. IR (KBr): 3175, 3096, 2985, 1729, 1644, 1587, 1367, 1280, 1202, 1092, 924, 856, 780 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C17H16NaClNO5 [M + Na]+ 372.0615, found 372.0611.

Diethyl 3-(4-bromobenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3ea)

Yellow solid (61 mg, yield 78%); mp 118–119 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.14 (s, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.07 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.14 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.8, 159.9, 159.4, 137.0, 131.7, 131.1, 128.3, 127.9, 125.6, 124.6, 116.5, 61.6, 61.5, 14.3, 13.6. IR (KBr): 3249, 3144, 2982, 2933, 1726, 1670, 1586, 1560, 1467, 1370, 1264, 1093, 1017, 848, 785, 754 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C17H16NaBrNO5 [M + Na]+ 416.0110, found 416.0132.

Diethyl 3-([1,1′-biphenyl]-3-carbonyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3fa)

White solid (63 mg, 81% yield); mp 164–167 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.32 (s, 1H), δ 7.95 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), δ 7.69 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H). 4.42 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.13 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.41 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.5, 160.1, 159.7, 145.8, 139.9, 136.9, 130.2, 129.0, 128.5, 128.3, 127.3, 127.0, 125.5, 124.8, 116.6, 61.5, 61.5, 14.3, 13.6. IR (KBr): 3264, 3057, 2982, 2925, 1720, 1701, 1654, 1602, 1556, 1469, 1368, 1262, 1194, 1090, 1023, 923, 858, 781, 746 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C23H21NaNO5 [M + Na]+ 414.1318; found 414.1354.

Diethyl 3-(2-naphthoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3ga)

White solid (64 mg, yield 88%); mp 102–104 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.22 (s, 1H), 8.73 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.94–7.90 (m, 1H), 7.67–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.46–7.39 (m, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.86 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.42–1.38 (m, 3H), 0.62 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.9, 158.8, 158.5, 135.5, 132.6, 131.4, 129.6, 129.0, 128.7, 127.0, 126.7, 125.3, 124.7, 124.1, 123.9, 122.9, 116.2, 60.2, 60.2, 13.0, 11.9. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.2, 136.7, 133.8, 132.7, 130.8, 130.3, 130.0, 128.3, 127.9, 126.5, 126.0, 125.4, 125.2, 124.2, 117.5, 61.5, 14.3, 13.2; IR (KBr): 3284, 3122, 2985, 1722, 1688, 1655, 1554, 1468, 1265, 1019, 875, 780 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C21H19NaNO5 [M + Na]+ 388.1161, found 388.1137.

Diethyl 3-(thiophene-2-carbonyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3ha)

Yield liquid (55 mg, yield 86%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.19 (s, 1H), 7.62 (dd, J = 4.9, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (dd, J = 3.7, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (s, 2H), 4.31 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 4.12 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.30 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.01 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 183.5, 183.3, 159.9, 159.6, 144.9, 134.5, 128.3, 128.0, 125.2, 125.0, 124.6, 116.2, 61.5, 14.3, 13.7. IR (KBr): 3254, 3103, 2982, 2931, 1719, 1643, 1561, 1515, 1465, 1412, 1365, 1261, 1205, 1093, 1025, 1021, 858, 813, 749 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C15H15NaNO5S [M + Na]+: 344.0569, found 344.0594.

Diethyl 3-(2-bromobenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3ia)

Colorless liquid (65 mg, yield 82%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.33 (s, 1H), 7.64 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (dt, J = 7.4, 5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.15 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.10 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.37 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.09 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.5, 159.9, 159.4, 141.0, 133.7, 131.8, 130.4, 128.1, 127.4, 127.0, 125.8, 125.0, 120.4, 118.1, 61.7, 61.5, 14.2, 13.8. IR (KBr): 3263, 2993, 2936, 1727, 1660, 1584, 1558, 1470, 1452, 1369, 1280, 1211, 1090, 1026, 780, 757, 645 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C17H16BrNaNO5 [M + Na]+ 416.0110, found 416.0134.

2-Ethyl 5-methyl 3-benzoyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3ja)

Colourless liquid (48 mg, yield 80%), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.53 (s, 1H), 7.90–7.79 (m, 2H), 7.55 (dd, J = 10.5, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.9, 160.5, 159.7, 138.2, 133.0, 129.6, 128.3, 128.3, 125.2, 125.1, 116.8, 61.5, 52.3, 13.4. IR (KBr): 3264, 2985, 2957, 2903, 1723, 1663, 1561, 1456, 1431, 1269, 1211, 1092, 1010, 918, 782, 722, 691. HRMS (ESI) m/z: C16H15NO5Na [M + Na]+ 324.0848, found 324.0827.

5-tert-Butyl 2-ethyl 3-benzoyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylate (3ka)

Yellow liquid (57 mg, yield 84%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.45 (s, 1H), 7.84–7.79 (m, 2H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.54 (s, 9H), 0.86 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.1, 159.8, 159.3, 138.3, 132.9, 129.5, 128.3, 127.0, 124.3, 116.1, 82.4, 61.3, 28.2, 13.4. IR (KBr): 3270, 2980, 2934, 1719, 1664, 1559, 1457, 1368, 1278, 1210, 1158, 1092, 991, 848, 783, 722, 693 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: C19H21NO5Na [M + Na]+ 366.1318, found 366.1327.

Ethyl 5-benzoyl-4-(4-methylbenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3ab)

White solid (54 mg, 79% yield). Mp: 130–132 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.75 (s, 1H), 7.51 (td, J = 8.1, 1.1 Hz, 4H), 7.44–7.35 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.23 (m, 3H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 4.40 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.39 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.3, 187.1, 160.2, 138.7, 137.9, 133.7, 132.8, 132.6, 129.2, 129.1, 128.9, 128.3, 128.2, 125.6, 117.2, 61.6, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3171, 3097, 2970, 2927, 2864, 1708, 1657, 1640, 1596, 1564, 1452, 1284, 1212, 1024, 956, 877, 718 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C21H17NaNO4 [M + Na]+ 370.1056, found 370.1046. Found 370.1058.

Ethyl 4-benzoyl-5-(4-methylbenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3ac)

Yellow liquid (55 mg, yield 76%) 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.65 (s, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 7.29 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.31 (s, 3H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.4, 185.8, 163.5, 160.3, 138.7, 134.3, 132.6, 132.3, 131.5, 131.4, 130.7, 130.2, 129.2, 128.9, 128.4, 128.2, 125.2, 117.3, 113.7, 61.5, 55.5, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3252, 3062, 2981, 1716, 1650, 1603, 1556, 1452, 1277, 1201, 1023, 959, 880, 730 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C22H19NaNO4 [M + Na]+ 384.1212, found 384.1230.

Ethyl 4-benzoyl-5-(4-methylbenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3ad)

Yellow liquid (62 mg, yield 82%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.49 (s, 1H), 7.57–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.46–7.40 (m, 3H), 7.27 (dd, J = 8.9, 6.6 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.40 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 1.39 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.34, 186.8, 160.2, 143.8, 138.7, 135.3, 134.0, 132.6, 129.2, 129.1, 129.1, 128.8, 128.1, 125.3, 117.2, 61.5, 21.6, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3174, 2964, 2925, 1708, 1657, 1564, 1452, 1283, 1212, 1025, 718 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C22H19NaNO5 [M + Na]+ 400.1161, found 400.1154.

Ethyl 4-benzoyl-5-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3ae)

White solid (54 mg, yield 71%); mp 138–139 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.70 (s, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 4.42 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.41 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.1, 185.9, 160.1, 139.3, 138.5, 136.2, 133.4, 132.8, 130.2, 129.2, 129.1, 128.7, 128.3, 125.9, 117.3, 61.6, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3127, 3091, 1993, 1716, 1646, 1591, 1566, 1453, 1281, 1215, 1020, 958, 878, 733 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C21H16ClNaNO4 [M + Na]+ 404.0666, found 404.0670.

Ethyl 4-benzoyl-5-(4-bromobenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3af)

Yellow solid (60 mg, yield 71%); mp 119–121 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.43 (s, 1H), 7.58–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 7.37 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 3H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.2, 186.0, 160.0, 138.5, 136.6, 133.1, 132.9, 131.6, 130.2, 129.2, 128.3, 128.0, 125.9, 117.3, 61.7, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3125, 2995, 1716, 1645, 1585, 1564, 1453, 1279, 1216, 1068, 1021, 957, 851, 731 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C21H16BrNaNO4 [M + Na]+ 448.0161, found 448.0172.

Ethyl 5-benzoyl-4-(4-methybenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3bb)

White solid (52 mg, yield 81%); mp 120–125 °C; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.63 (s, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.19 (m, 3H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.0, 187.1, 160.2, 143.5, 137.9, 136.1, 133.6, 132.8, 129.4, 129.4, 128.9, 128.9, 128.2, 125.5, 117.1, 61.5, 21.6, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3246, 3061, 2984, 1716, 1642, 1603, 1550, 1450, 1346, 1281, 1202, 1029, 769 cm−1. HRMS calcd for: C22H19NaNO4 [M + Na]+ 384.1212, found 384.1225.

Ethyl 5-benzoyl-4-(4-methoxybenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3cb)

Yellow liquid (54 mg, yield 73%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.63 (s, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.24–7.19 (m, 3H), 7.07 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.0, 187.1, 163.3, 160.2, 137.9, 133.3, 132.8, 131.6, 131.6, 129.6, 128.8, 128.2, 125.6, 117.0, 113.5, 61.5, 55.5, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3249, 3065, 2962, 2931, 2843, 1715, 1645, 1598, 1501, 1449, 1256, 1021, 1171, 1115, 1025, 960, 881, 735 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C22H19NaNO4 [M + Na]+ 400.1161, found 400.1120.

Ethyl 5-benzoyl-4-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3db)

White solid (58 mg, yield 76%); mp 163–165 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.76 (s, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (dd, J = 12.6, 4.9 Hz, 5H), 4.42 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.41 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.1, 187.0, 160.2, 139.0, 137.9, 137.1, 133.7, 133.0, 130.4, 128.9, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 125.9, 117.1, 61.6, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3242, 3066, 2985, 1717, 1644, 1589, 1553, 1449, 1281, 1204, 878, 768 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C21H16ClNaNO4 [M + Na]+ 404.0666, found 404.0623.

Ethyl 5-benzoyl-4-(4-bromobenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3eb)

White solid (62 mg, yield 73%); mp 163–165 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.74 (s, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.45–7.36 (m, 4H), 7.25 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.2 Hz, 3H), 4.42 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.41 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.3, 187.0, 160.2, 137.9, 137.5, 133.7, 133.0, 131.5, 130.5, 130.2, 128.9, 128.6, 128.4, 128.4, 127.8, 125.8, 117.1, 61.7, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3252, 3065, 2983, 1716, 1643, 1583, 1552, 1450, 1282, 1203, 1029, 877, 768 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C21H16BrNaNO4 [M + Na]+ 448.0161, found 448.0182.

Ethyl 4-([1,1′-biphenyl]-3-carbonyl)-5-benzoyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3fb)

White solid (52 mg, yield 61%); mp 161–165 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.50 (s, 1H), 7.59 (dd, J = 14.6, 7.8 Hz, 4H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.51–7.47 (m, 4H), 7.41 (dd, J = 15.0, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 4.45 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.43 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.9, 187.1, 160.2, 145.3, 139.9, 138.0, 137.5, 133.6, 132.8, 129.8, 129.2, 129.0, 128.9, 128.3, 128.2, 127.2, 126.9, 125.7, 117.2, 61.6, 14.4. IR (KBr): 3251, 3062, 2982, 1717, 1641, 1600, 1553, 1450, 1279, 1203, 1026, 881, 752 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C27H21NaNO4 [M + Na]+ 446.1369, found 446.1375.

Ethyl 4-(2-naphthoyl)-5-benzoyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3gb)

White solid (65 mg, yield 82%); mp 164–169 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.89 (s, 1H), 8.33–8.26 (m, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.71–7.66 (m, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.39 (m, 3H), 7.38–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.26 (m, 1H), 6.94–6.90 (m, 2H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.8, 187.7, 160.4, 137.7, 136.9, 134.8, 133.6, 132.7, 132.1, 130.4, 129.7, 128.7, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.3, 126.4, 125.9, 125.4, 123.9, 117.7, 61.5, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3245, 3059, 2974, 1714, 1644, 1595, 1555, 1449, 1274, 1205, 1022, 944, 886, 766, 694 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C25H19NaNO4 [M + Na]+ 420.1212, found 420.1204.

Ethyl 5-benzoyl-4-(thiophene-2-carbonyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3hb)

White solid (52 mg, yield 73%); mp 138–141 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.58 (s, 1H), 7.63–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.55 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.25 (m, 2H), δ 7.02–6.99 (m, 1H), 4.42 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.41 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 187.0, 182.7, 160.1, 145.2, 137.7, 134.6, 134.1, 133.2, 132.9, 129.1, 128.9, 128.4, 127.9, 125.7, 116.5, 61.6, 14.4. IR (KBr): 3249, 3103, 2972, 1718, 1638, 1553, 1451, 1282, 1190, 1027, 818, 768, 728 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C19H15SNaNO4 [M + Na]+ 376.0620, found 376.0627.

Ethyl 5-benzoyl-4-(2-bromobenzoyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (3ib)

Yellow liquid (60 mg, yield 71%) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.74 (s, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.54–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (ddd, J = 10.5, 5.9, 3.0 Hz, 3H), 7.14 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.37 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 189.6, 187.6, 160.2, 140.3, 137.4, 134.9, 133.7, 133.3, 131.7, 130.2, 129.1, 128.5, 127.7, 127.1, 125.2, 120.1, 118.0, 61.6, 14.3. IR (KBr): 3243, 3102, 2993, 2936, 1724, 1634, 1584, 1548, 1470, 1454, 1366, 1280, 1211, 1090, 1026, 783, 756, cm−1 HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for: C21H16BrNaNO4 [M + Na]+ 448.0161, found 448.0157.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21472053, 21172082). The Analysis and Testing Centre of Huazhong University of Science and Technology is acknowledged for characterization of the new compounds.

Notes and references

  1. (a) H. Kang and W. Fenical, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 3254 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) C. Sanchez, C. Mendez and J. A. Salas, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2006, 23, 1007 RSC; (c) B. M. Trost and G. Dong, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 2357 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. (a) A. Fürstner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3582 CrossRef PubMed; (b) G. La Regina, R. Silvestri, M. Artico, A. Lavecchia, E. Novellino, O. Befani, P. Turini and E. Agostinelli, J. Med. Chem., 2007, 50, 922 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. (a) S. K. Srivastava, C. N. M. Shefali, M. D. Aceto, J. R. Traynor, J. W. Lewis and S. M. Husbands, J. Med. Chem., 2004, 47, 6645 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) T. Tshibaka, U. I. Roche, S. Dufresne, W. D. Lubell and W. G. Skene, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 9497 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) C. Schmuck, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65(8), 2432–2437 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) D. Wu, A. B. Descalzo, F. Weik, F. Emmerling, Z. Shen, X. Z. You and K. Rurack, Angew. Chem., 2008, 120, 199–203 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 193–197) CrossRef.
  4. C. Mazet and L. H. Gade, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 1161–1168 CrossRef CAS.
  5. (a) A. R. Howard-Jones and C. T. Walsh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 12289–12298 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) H. J. Knolker and K. R. Reddy, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 4303 CrossRef PubMed.
  6. (a) D. L. Boger, C. W. Boyce, M. Labroli, C. A. Sehon and Q. Jin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 54–62 CrossRef CAS; (b) D. L. Boger and J. S. Oakdale, Org. Lett., 2010, 12(5), 1132–1134 CrossRef PubMed , and its cited references.
  7. (a) P. A. Gale, K. Navakhun, S. Camiolo, M. E. Light and M. B. Hursthouse, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 11228–11229 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) L. S. Evans, P. A. Gale, M. E. Light and R. Quesada, New J. Chem., 2006, 30, 1019–1025 RSC.
  8. T. M. Chang, S. Sinharay, A. V. Astashkin and E. Tomat, Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53, 7518–7526 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. For some recent methods for preparation of 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dicarboxylates see: (a) N. C. Misra, K. Panda, H. Ila and H. Junjappa, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 1246–1251 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) A. V. Galenko, A. F. Khlebnikov, M. S. Novikov and M. S. Avdontceva, Tetrahedron, 2015, 71(13), 1940–1951 CrossRef CAS; (c) Y. J. Li, H. M. Huang, H. Q. Dong, J. H. Jia, L. Han, Q. Ye and J. R. Gao, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 9424–9430 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) E. Yasui, M. Wada, S. J. Nagumoa and N. Takamura, Tetrahedron, 2013, 69, 4325–4330 CrossRef CAS; (e) C. H. Li, G. Q. Yuan, J. H. Zheng, Z. H. He, C. R. Qi and H. R. Jiang, Tetrahedron, 2011, 67, 4202–4205 CrossRef CAS.
  10. P. Barker, P. Gendler and H. Rappoport, J. Org. Chem., 1978, 43, 4849–4853 CrossRef CAS.
  11. C. Schmuc, Chem. Commun., 1999, 843–844 RSC.
  12. D. Ciez, Org. Lett., 2009, 11(19), 4282–4285 CrossRef CAS PubMed , and its cited inferences.
  13. (a) J. E. Banning, A. R. Prosser and M. Rubin, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 3968–3971 CrossRef PubMed; (b) B. K. Alnasleh, W. M. Sherrill, M. Rubina, J. Banning and M. Rubin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6906–6907 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. P. Ryabchuk, M. Rubina, J. Xu and M. Rubin, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 1752–1755 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. A. V. Galenko, A. F. Khlebnikov, M. S. Novikov and M. S. Avdontceva, Tetrahedron, 2015, 71, 1940–1951 CrossRef CAS.
  16. M. Zhang, Y. F. Gong and W. Z. Wang, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 32, 7372–7381 CrossRef.
  17. (a) M. Zhang, J. K. Guo and Y. F. Gong, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2014, 9, 1942–1950 CrossRef; (b) M. Zhang, F. Luo and Y. F. Gong, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 1335–1343 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) Y. Q. Zhu, M. Zhang, H. L. Yuan and Y. F. Gong, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 8828–8831 RSC.
  18. Y. Q. Zhu and Y. F. Gong, J. Org. Chem., 2015, 80, 490–498 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. (a) S. Kobayashi, H. Shimizu, Y. Yamashita, H. Ishitani and J. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 13678 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) S. Shirakawa, P. J. Lombardi and J. L. Leighton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 9974 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) X. Hong, H. B. Küçük, M. S. Maji, Y. F. Yang, M. Rueping and K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 13769 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. Z. M. Huang, J. H. Hu and Y. F. Gong, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2015, 13(31), 8561–8566 CAS.
  21. The single crystal X-ray data see CCDC 1406166.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 1406166. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c6ra01829g

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.