Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Highly efficient synthesis and stereoselective migration reactions of chiral five-membered aza-spiroindolenines: scope and mechanistic understanding

Qing-Feng Wu , Chao Zheng *, Chun-Xiang Zhuo and Shu-Li You *
State Key Laboratory of Organometallic Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 345 Lingling Lu, Shanghai 200032, China. E-mail: zhengchao@sioc.ac.cn; slyou@sioc.ac.cn; Web: http://shuliyou.sioc.ac.cn/

Received 14th January 2016 , Accepted 29th March 2016

First published on 29th March 2016


Abstract

An Ir-catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of five-membered aza-spiroindolenines is achieved. Based on the detailed investigation of the reaction patterns of the aryl iminium migration, a one-pot asymmetric allylic dearomatization/migration sequence from racemic indole derivatives is realized, affording enantioenriched Pictet–Spengler-type products bearing an additional allylic stereogenic center adjacent to the C3 position of the indole core.


Introduction

The Pictet–Spengler reaction1 has long been recognized as one of the most powerful methods for the synthesis of tetrahydro-β-carbolines and other indole alkaloids with more complex structures.2 Despite their widespread use, mechanistically, Pictet–Spengler-type reactions still need further investigation.1c In general, there are two possible pathways (Scheme 1): the reaction can occur through either the direct attack of the C2 position of indole towards the iminium moiety (path a) or the stepwise spiroindolization/migration sequence (path b). Although experimental evidence supporting the latter mechanism is documented a number of times in the literature,3 to the best of our knowledge, the five-membered aza-spiroindolenine, the key intermediate (II) for the asymmetric Pictet–Spengler reaction, has not been isolated yet.4
image file: c6sc00176a-s1.tif
Scheme 1 The possible pathways for Pictet–Spengler reactions.

As a part of our ongoing program of developing the catalytic asymmetric dearomatization (CADA) reaction,5 we reported in 2012 the enantioselective synthesis of carbocyclic spiroindolenines 2 with excellent enantioselectivity via Ir-catalyzed allylic dearomatization reactions of indole derivatives 1.6–8 Highly stereoselective allyl migration of 2 was achieved when treated with a catalytic amount of TsOH (eqn (1), Scheme 2).9 A mechanism involving a “three-center-two-electron” transition state is proposed according to DFT calculations and it is suggested that the electronic properties of the migratory group exert a great influence on the profile of the migration.10 Intriguingly, the reaction of the N-tethered substrate analogue 4 with an electron-donating group (EDG) attached to the nitrogen atom under Ir-catalysis yields the unexpected tetrahydro-β-carbolines 6, with the tether that was originally attached to the C3 position of indole moving to the C2 position. A dearomatized five-membered aza-spiroindolenine intermediate 5 was observed by in situ IR spectroscopy, but the attempts to isolate this intermediate were all unsuccessful (eqn (2), Scheme 2).11–13 Recently, by tuning the electronic properties of the N-linker, we achieved the synthesis of five-membered aza-spiroindolenines 8 with three contiguous stereogenic centers, from indole derivatives (±)-7 by Ir-catalysis. Upon isolation, 8 were exposed to acidic conditions, and the tetrahydro-β-carbolines 9 were delivered via aryl iminium migration (eqn (3), Scheme 2). Interestingly, the reaction pattern of the migration step highly depends on the relative stereochemistry of 8. Guided by further mechanistic investigations including DFT calculations, a one-pot asymmetric synthesis of Pictet–Spengler-type products 9, with two stereogenic centers, from (±)-7 was realized under enhanced reaction conditions. Herein, we report the full account of this study.


image file: c6sc00176a-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Ir-Catalyzed intramolecular asymmetric allylic dearomatization and subsequent migration.

Results and discussion

Asymmetric synthesis of five-membered aza-spiroindolenines

Our study began by testing indol-3-yl phenyl allylic carbonates (±)-7 in Ir-catalyzed intramolecular allylic dearomatization reactions (Table 1).14 We envisioned that the addition of an electron-withdrawing group (EWG) to the N-linker might stabilize the desired five-membered aza-spiroindolenines 8 by reducing their activity toward the migration process. However, the existence of a benzylic substituent in 7 posed additional challenges for stereochemical control. Under the optimal conditions, three diastereoisomers of 8 were obtained in relatively good yields and excellent enantiomeric excess (ee). The structures and absolute configurations [(3S,8R,10R) for 8aA; (3R,8S,10R) for 8aB and (3S,8S,10R) for 8aC] were determined unambiguously by X-ray crystallographic analysis.16 When the protecting group on the nitrogen atom was Ts, the reactions of substrates bearing either an EDG (5-OMe, 7b and 6-Me, 7c) or an EWG (5-Br, 7d) on the indole core all led to their corresponding spiroindolenine products in excellent yields and ee. Substrates bearing various aryl groups (Ar) on the tether (7e–k) were well tolerated but showed very different activities. p-Tol substituted 7e gave the best diastereomeric ratio (dr) value of all of the N–Ts linked substrates tested. Notably, when an o-ClC6H4 substituted substrate 7j was used, the two diastereoisomers 8jA and 8jC could not be separated by column chromatography, giving a good combined isolated yield with an excellent ee. On the other hand, the reaction proceeded smoothly for the substrates containing different N-protecting groups (7l–q), affording the five-membered aza-spiroindolenine products in good yields and ee with a moderate to excellent dr. Among them, the N-Boc protected substrates bearing either an EDG (7o and 7p) or an EWG (7q) at various positions all gave a good dr and excellent ee.
Table 1 Scope of the Ir-catalyzed allylic dearomatization reactiona
a Reaction conditions: 0.004 mmol of [Ir(cod)Cl]2, 0.008 mmol of L1 and 0.2 mmol of 7, 0.4 mmol of Cs2CO3 in dioxane (2.0 mL) at 50 °C. The catalyst was prepared vianPrNH2 activation.15 The dr values are determined by 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture. The ee values are determined by HPLC analysis. The isolated yields are reported. N. D.: not determined.
image file: c6sc00176a-u1.tif


On the origin of the three diastereomers of the five-membered aza-spiroindolenines

In order to gain deep insights into the origin of the three diastereoisomers of 8 from (±)-7, the enantiopure substrates (R)-7a and (S)-7a obtained by preparative HPLC were subjected to the standard dearomatization reaction conditions (Scheme 3). (R)-7a was converted to 8aA in a 94% yield and >99% ee. On the other hand, (S)-7a was transformed to 8aB and 8aC in a 1/8 dr and >99% ee. The ratio of the three diastereoisomers of 8a(A–C) and their stereochemistry are in agreement with the reaction results for (±)-7a (Table 1). In addition, 8aA could also be obtained from (R)-7a in 98% yield with >99% ee in 2 h, with Pd(PPh3)4 as an achiral catalyst.
image file: c6sc00176a-s3.tif
Scheme 3 The reaction patterns of enantiopure substrates.

Stereoselective aryl iminium migration

With the optimized method for the construction of the highly enantioenriched aryl substituted five-membered aza-spiroindolenines in hand, we next sought to identify conditions that are suitable for the subsequent migration process. It was quite interesting to find that the three diastereoisomers of 8a exhibit extremely different reactivities when exposed to our previously established migration conditions (10 mol% TsOH·H2O in THF at room temperature) (Scheme 4).98aC was easily converted to tetrahydro-β-carboline cis-9a in a satisfactory yield and preserved ee within 1 minute. X-Ray crystallographic analysis of cis-9a showed that the aryl iminium moiety migrated to the C2 position of indole and the stereochemistry (8S,10R) of the benzylic position can be maintained, which is consistent with our understanding of the migration mechanism.10 The minor diastereoisomer 8aB also underwent similar regio- and stereoselective migration to afford cis-9a smoothly, albeit with a longer reaction time (12 h) at room temperature. However, the other major diastereoisomer 8aA remained intact even at an elevated temperature (50 °C).17
image file: c6sc00176a-s4.tif
Scheme 4 Regio- and stereoselective migration of the five-membered aza-spiroindolenines.

To test the generality of the regio- and stereoselective N–Ts aryl iminium migration reactions, the most reactive diastereoisomer 8C possessing different substituents was subjected to the above reaction conditions (Table 2). In all cases, the absolute configuration at the benzylic positions and the ee values of the compounds were well maintained, leading to the corresponding tetrahydro-β-carbolines cis-9 smoothly, in a highly enantioenriched form.

Table 2 Scope of the regio- and stereoselective migrationa
a Reaction conditions: 0.1 mmol of 8, 0.01 mmol of TsOH·H2O in THF (2 mL) at rt. The ee values are determined by HPLC analysis. The numbers in the parentheses are the ee values of the starting materials 8C. The isolated yields are reported.
image file: c6sc00176a-u2.tif


DFT calculations

DFT calculations18 (PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory) were carried out at this stage to investigate why the diastereoisomers of 8 exhibit dramatically different reactivities toward the migration process (Fig. 1). The complexes of the three diastereoisomers (8aA, 8aB and 8aC) with TsOH, named A·TsOH (0.0 kcal mol−1), B·TsOH (−0.9 kcal mol−1) and C·TsOH (1.5 kcal mol−1), respectively, were set as the starting points for their corresponding migration processes. All of the aryl N–Ts iminium migrations were characterized to be stepwise.19 The C·TsOH complex was the most prone to the reaction. The C3–C8 bond was cleaved via the ring-opening transition state TS1-C (17.8 kcal mol−1), leading to the key intermediate INT1-C (16.7 kcal mol−1) with an E-iminium moiety formed. Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis of this intermediate revealed the existence of interactions between the indole ring and the N–Ts iminium part. According to the second-order perturbation theory analysis, the stabilization energy E(2) from the occupied π(C2–C3) orbital to the unoccupied π*(N–C8) orbital is estimated to be 5.69 kcal mol−1. It is speculated that this kind of interaction might account for the highly stereoselective migration phenomenon. Subsequently, the iminium carbon C8 is attacked by the indole C2 position via a chair-like six-membered-ring transition state TS2-C (18.3 kcal mol−1) to afford the protonated tetrahydro-β-carboline complex INT2-C (6.8 kcal mol−1). After the following deprotonation step (not shown in Fig. 1), the final complex cis-Pro (−10.1 kcal mol−1) is generated. For the second reactive species B·TsOH, a similar reaction profile was found, except a Z-iminium intermediate INT1-B (16.9 kcal mol−1) is involved, which makes the ring-closure (TS2-B, 22.0 kcal mol−1), the rate-limiting step, slightly higher in energy. If an E-iminium intermediate was forced to be generated from B·TsOH, the ring-closure step must proceed through an unfavorable boat-like six-membered-ring transition state which further raises the energetic barrier. The migration process of complex A·TsOH shares something in common with that of B·TsOH because an unfavorable Z-iminium intermediate (INT1-A, 17.6 kcal mol−1) is also generated. An additional detrimental factor for the migration process of A·TsOH was also identified in the key ring-closure transition state TS2-A (23.3 kcal mol−1). The vinyl moiety on the tether points toward the indole ring, which will cause a stronger steric repulsion compared with that observed in TS2-B where a hydrogen atom instead of the vinyl group is found in that place (highlighted in blue). As a result, TS2-A ranks as the most high-energy one among the three ring-closure transition states. In general, the order of reactivity toward the TsOH-catalyzed migration of the three diastereoisomers is qualitatively reproduced by computations. Besides, the calculated energetic barriers for the allyl migration are always higher than those of the aryl N–Ts iminium migration, which is also consistent with experimental observations.
image file: c6sc00176a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 The reaction profiles for the TsOH catalyzed migration processes of the diastereoisomers of 8. Calculated at a PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory. ΔGTHF and (ΔETHF) values are in kcal mol−1. The transition states of the deprotonation steps are not shown.

One-pot asymmetric allylic dearomatization/migration procedure

Based on the above mechanistic understanding, we decided to develop a one-pot highly stereoselective procedure to synthesize tetrahydro-β-carbolines 9 from (±)-7, which requires the full conversion of all of the three diastereoisomers of the intermediate 8. However, the unreactive 8A is the major challenge. Since the absolute configuration of the benzylic stereogenic center (C8) of 8A is the opposite of that of 8B and 8C, even if 8A could take part in the migration reaction, and at the same time all of the chiral information at the benzylic position was preserved, only a mixture of cis-9 and trans-9 with a 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ratio could be obtained [the ratio of 8A[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)](8B + 8C) is about 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1]. We speculated that using a stronger acid as the catalyst might be a possible solution to this issue. The reasons for this choice include: (1) the spiroindolenines can be better activated by stronger acids and thus the ring-opening step can be better facilitated; (2) stronger acids might lead to a more loosely bound ion-pair in INT-1, which in turn might weaken or even destroy the interaction between the indole ring and the aryl iminium moiety, thus reducing the possibility of the maintenance of the chiral information possessed by the migratory group. To our delight, we discovered that freshly prepared saturated HCl (g)/THF was an efficient acid system to promote the migration of 8aA, providing two diastereoisomers of the tetrahydro-β-carbolines cis-9a and trans-9a in a 1.5/1 dr (Scheme 5).14 Intriguingly, the major diastereoisomer obtained (cis-9a) was the same as that from 8aB or 8aC (8S,10R). This means that the absolute configuration of the benzylic stereogenic center of 8aA can indeed be inversed during the migration process in a more acidic medium, and a free iminium species (IV) might be formed during the migration. The diastereoselectivity of the migration step might be induced by the allylic stereogenic center adjacent to the C3 position of the indole core. Encouraged by these findings, we further identified enhanced reaction conditions for the one-pot synthesis of tetrahydro-β-carbolines 9 from (±)-7via a dearomatization/migration sequence.14 Under the optimal conditions, the desired product cis-9a was obtained in a 77% yield and good dr (cis-9a/trans-9a = 5/1) (Scheme 6).
image file: c6sc00176a-s5.tif
Scheme 5 Migration reaction for the diastereoisomer 8aA.

image file: c6sc00176a-s6.tif
Scheme 6 Optimized reaction conditions for the one-pot synthesis of tetrahydro-β-carbolines.

With this newly established one-pot asymmetric allylic dearomatization/migration procedure, various substrates were tested to examine the generality of the reaction (Table 3). Reactions of substrates bearing either an EDG (5-OMe, 7b and 6-Me, 7c) or an EWG (5-Br, 7d) on the indole core all led to their corresponding Pictet–Spengler-type products in moderate dr and yields with excellent ee (3.8/1–4/1 dr, 62–70% yield, 92–94% ee). Substrates bearing aryl groups with various substituted patterns (p-F, 9f; p-Cl, 9g; m-Br, 9h; p-Br, 9i and o-Cl, 9j) on the tether underwent the dearomatization/migration reaction smoothly to give the tetrahydro-β-carbolines with satisfactory results (5/1–6/1 dr, 64–75% yields, 93–95% ee). The different N-protecting groups such as Ms and Boc (9l and 9n) were also tolerated, affording the corresponding products in good yields and enantioselectivity (92–93% ee), albeit with a decreased dr.

Table 3 Scope of the one-pot asymmetric allylic dearomatization/migration procedurea
a Reaction conditions: for step 1: the same as shown in Table 1. For step 2: the reaction residue of step 1 containing intermediate 8 in HCl (g)/THF (4.0 mL, 4.5 mol L−1) at rt. The dr values are determined by 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture. The ee values are determined by HPLC analysis. The isolated yields are reported. b Combined yield of the two diastereoisomers.
image file: c6sc00176a-u3.tif


Conclusions

In summary, we have developed highly efficient synthesis and stereoselective migration reactions of enantioenriched five-membered aza-spiroindolenines on the basis of a deep understanding of the reaction mechanism and the rational design of the substrates. Ir-catalyzed intramolecular allylic dearomatization of the racemic indol-3-yl aryl substituted allylic carbonates led to the highly enantioenriched five-membered aza-spiroindolenines which are isolated and fully characterized for the first time. A detailed investigation of the reaction patterns of the three diastereoisomers paved the way to a highly regio- and stereoselective migration whose mechanism was further understood by DFT calculations. In addition, a one-pot asymmetric allylic dearomatization/migration sequence was developed under enhanced reaction conditions, providing a novel strategy to synthesize the Pictet–Spengler-type products with an additional allylic stereogenic center adjacent to the C3 position of indole.

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program 2015CB856600) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21332009, 21302209 and 21421091) for generous financial support.

Notes and references

  1. For reviews: (a) E. D. Cox and J. M. Cook, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 1797 CrossRef CAS; (b) J. Royer, M. Bonin and L. Micouin, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 2311 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J. Stöckigt, A. P. Antonchick, F. Wu and H. Waldmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8538 CrossRef PubMed.
  2. For reviews: (a) S. Cacchi and G. Fabrizi, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 2873 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) M. Bandini, A. Melloni, S. Tommasi and A. Umani-Ronchi, Synlett, 2005, 1199 CrossRef CAS; (c) M. Bandini and A. Eichholzer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9608 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) L. Joucla and L. Djakovitch, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 673 CrossRef CAS; (e) M. Zeng and S.-L. You, Synlett, 2010, 1289 CAS; (f) G. Bartoli, G. Bencivenni and R. Dalpozzo, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4449 RSC; (g) S. Cacchi and G. Fabrizi, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, PR215 CrossRef PubMed.
  3. (a) A. H. Jackson and A. E. Smith, Tetrahedron, 1965, 21, 989 CrossRef CAS; (b) A. H. Jackson and A. E. Smith, Tetrahedron, 1968, 24, 403 CrossRef CAS; (c) A. H. Jackson and P. Smith, Tetrahedron, 1968, 24, 2227 CrossRef CAS; (d) A. H. Jackson, B. Naidoo and P. Smith, Tetrahedron, 1968, 24, 6119 CrossRef CAS; (e) J. S. L. Ibaceta-Lizana, A. H. Jackson, N. Prasitpan and P. V. R. Shannon, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1987, 1221 RSC; (f) Q. Nguyen, T. Nguyen and T. G. Driver, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 620 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. The five-membered aza-spiroindolines can be obtained via condensation of tryptamine derivatives and aldehydes under reduction conditions: (a) J. R. Williams and L. R. Unger, Chem. Commun., 1970, 1605 RSC; (b) F. Ungemach and J. M. Cook, Heterocycles, 1978, 9, 1089 CrossRef CAS; (c) P. D. Bailey, J. Chem. Res., Synop., 1987, 202 CAS; (d) T. Kawate, M. Nakagawa, K. Ogata and T. Hino, Heterocycles, 1992, 33, 801 CrossRef CAS; (e) R. V. Edwankar, C. R. Edwankar, O. A. Namjoshi, J. R. Deschamps and J. M. Cook, J. Nat. Prod., 2012, 75, 181 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) M. Jia, G. Cera, D. Perrotta, M. Monari and M. Bandini, Chem.–Eur. J., 2014, 20, 9875 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. For selected examples of CADA reactions of indoles: (a) J. F. Austin, S.-G. Kim, C. J. Sinz, W.-J. Xiao and D. W. C. MacMillan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2004, 101, 5482 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) S. B. Jones, B. Simmons and D. W. C. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 13606 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) L. M. Repka, J. Ni and S. E. Reisman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 14418 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) T. Benkovics, I. A. Guzei and T. P. Yoon, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 9153 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) S. Zhu and D. W. C. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 10815 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) Z. Zhang and J. C. Antilla, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 11778 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) J. E. Spangler and H. M. L. Davies, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 6802 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) H. Xiong, H. Xu, S. Liao, Z. Xie and Y. Tang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 7851 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (i) M.-C. Tong, X. Chen, J. Li, R. Huang, H. Tao and C.-J. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 4680 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (j) H. M. Nelson, S. H. Reisberg, H. P. Shunatona, J. S. Patel and F. D. Toste, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5600 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (k) L. Liao, C. Shu, M. Zhang, Y. Liao, X. Hu, Y. Zhang, Z. Wu, W. Yuan and X. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 10471 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (l) C. Romano, M. Jia, M. Monari, E. Manoni and M. Bandini, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 13854 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (m) Y.-C. Zhang, J.-J. Zhao, F. Jiang, S.-B. Sun and F. Shi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 13912 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (n) C. Shen, R.-R. Liu, R.-J. Fan, Y.-L. Li, T.-F. Xu, J.-R. Gao and Y.-X. Jia, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 4936 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (o) X. Zhao, X. Liu, H. Mei, J. Guo, L. Lin and X. Feng, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 4032 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. For reviews on Ir-catalyzed allylic substitution reaction: (a) R. Takeuchi and S. Kezuka, Synthesis, 2006, 3349 CrossRef CAS; (b) G. Helmchen, A. Dahnz, P. Dübon, M. Schelwies and R. Weihofen, Chem. Commun., 2007, 675 RSC; (c) G. Helmchen, in Iridium Complexes in Organic Synthesis, ed. L. A. Oro and C. Claver, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2009, p. 211 Search PubMed; (d) J. F. Hartwig and L. M. Stanley, Acc. Chem. Res., 2010, 43, 1461 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) J. F. Hartwig and M. J. Pouy, Top. Organomet. Chem., 2011, 34, 169 CrossRef CAS; (f) W.-B. Liu, J.-B. Xia and S.-L. You, Top. Organomet. Chem., 2012, 38, 155 CrossRef; (g) P. Tosatti, A. Nelson and S. P. Marsden, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 3147 RSC.
  7. For a review on transition-metal catalyzed asymmetric allylic dearomatization reactions: (a) C.-X. Zhuo, C. Zheng and S.-L. You, Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 2558 CrossRef CAS PubMed. For selected examples from our group: (b) Q.-F. Wu, H. He, W.-B. Liu and S.-L. You, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 11418 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) Q.-L. Xu, L.-X. Dai and S.-L. You, Chem. Sci., 2013, 4, 97 RSC; (d) X. Zhang, L. Han and S.-L. You, Chem. Sci., 2014, 5, 1059 RSC; (e) X. Zhang, W.-B. Liu, H.-F. Tu and S.-L. You, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 4525 RSC.
  8. For selected examples on transition-metal catalyzed asymmetric allylic dearomatization reactions from other groups: (a) M. Kimura, M. Futamata, R. Mukai and Y. Tamaru, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 4592 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) M. Bandini, A. Melloni, F. Piccinelli, R. Sinisi, S. Tommasi and A. Umani-Ronchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 1424 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) B. M. Trost and J. Quancard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 6314 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) N. Kagawa, J. P. Malerich and V. H. Rawal, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 2381 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) M. Bandini and A. Eichholzer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9533 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) G. Cera, P. Crispino, M. Monari and M. Bandini, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 7803 RSC; (g) Y. Zhu and V. H. Rawal, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 111 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) M. Bandini, A. Bottoni, M. Chiarucci, G. Cera and G. P. Miscione, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 20690 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (i) G. Cera, M. Chiarucci, A. Mazzanti, M. Mancinelli and M. Bandini, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 1350 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (j) Y. Liu and H. Du, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 740 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (k) J. Chen and M. J. Cook, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 1088 CrossRef PubMed; (l) T. D. Montgomery, Y. Zhu, N. Kagawa and V. H. Rawal, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 1140 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (m) A. Lin, J. Yang and M. Hashim, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 1950 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (n) T. M. Kaiser and J. Yang, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 3983 CrossRef CAS; (o) Z.-S. Liu, W.-K. Li, T.-R. Kang, L. He and Q.-Z. Liu, Org. Lett., 2015, 17, 150 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. Q.-F. Wu, C. Zheng and S.-L. You, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 1680 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. C. Zheng, Q.-F. Wu and S.-L. You, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 4357 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. C.-X. Zhuo, Q.-F. Wu, Q. Zhao, Q.-L. Xu and S.-L. You, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 8169 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. The intermediates 5 can be captured by in situ reduction using NaBH4 or LiBH4 in some special cases to deliver their corresponding spiroindoline products: (a) Z.-P. Yang, C.-X. Zhuo and S.-L. You, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2014, 356, 1731 CrossRef CAS; (b) C.-X. Zhuo, Y. Zhou, Q. Cheng, L. Huang and S.-L. You, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 14146 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. Enantioselective synthesis of pyrrole-based spirocyclic analogs by Ir-catalyzed asymmetric allylic dearomatization and controllable migration reactions has been recently realized: C.-X. Zhuo, Q. Chen, W.-B. Liu, Q. Zhao and S.-L. You, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 8475 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. See ESI for the details of the evaluation of reaction conditions.
  15. (a) C. A. Kiener, C. Shu, C. Incarvito and J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 14272 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) C. Shu, A. Leitner and J. F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 4797 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. CCDC 1018536–1018541 contain the ESI crystallographic data for 8aA, 8aB, 8aC, cis-9a, trans-9a, and cis-9l.
  17. It was also found in a related case of multisubstituted five-membered carbo-spiroindolenines that the activity toward allyl migration is dependent on the relative configuration of diastereomers of carbo-spiroindolenines. See ref. 8(o).
  18. See the ESI for details of the DFT calculations.
  19. The nature of the migration process in the Pictet–Spengler-type reactions is highly dependent on the electronic property of the migratory group. For the transformation from 2 to 3, the allyl migration is concerted, while for the transformations from 5 to 6 and 8 to 9, only stepwise N-aryl iminium migration involving an intermediate like INT-1 exists. For a detailed study on this issue, see ref. 10.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, compound characterization data and computational details. CCDC 1018536–1018541. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c6sc00176a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016