The role and mechanisms of canonical and non-canonical tailoring enzymes in bacterial terpenoid biosynthesis

Abstract

Covering: up to April 2024

Terpenoids represent the largest and structurally most diverse class of natural products. According to textbook knowledge, this diversity arises from a two-step biosynthetic process: first, terpene cyclases generate a vast array of mono- and polycyclic hydrocarbon scaffolds with multiple stereocenters from a limited set of achiral precursors, a process extensively studied over the past two decades. Subsequently, tailoring enzymes further modify these complex scaffolds through regio- and stereocontrolled oxidation and other functionalization reactions, a topic of increasing interest in recent years. The resulting highly functionalized terpenoids exhibit a broad spectrum of unique biological activities, making them promising candidates for drug development. Recent advances in genome sequencing technologies along with the development and application of sophisticated genome mining tools have revealed bacteria as a largely untapped resource for the discovery of complex terpenoids. Functional characterization of a limited number of bacterial terpenoid biosynthetic pathways, combined with in-depth mechanistic studies of key enzymes, has begun to reveal the versatility of bacterial enzymatic processes involved in terpenoid modification. In this review, we examine the various tailoring reactions leading to complex bacterial terpenoids. We first discuss canonical terpene-modifying enzymes, that catalyze the functionalization of unactivated C–H bonds, incorporation of diverse functional groups, and oxidative and non-oxidative rearrangements. We then explore non-canonical terpene-modifying enzymes that facilitate oxidative rearrangement, cyclization, isomerization, and dimerization reactions. The increasing number of characterized tailoring enzymes that participate in terpene hydrocarbon scaffold fomation, rather than merely decorating pre-formed scaffolds suggests that a re-evaluation of the traditional two-phase model for terpenoid biosynthesis might be warranted. Finally, we address the potential and challenges of mining bacterial genomes to identify terpene biosynthetic gene clusters and expand the bacterial terpene biosynthetic and chemical space.