Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 9, 2020
Previous Article Next Article

Rock ‘n’ use of CO2: carbon footprint of carbon capture and utilization by mineralization

Author affiliations

Abstract

A recent approach to reduce the carbon footprint of industries with process-inherent CO2 emissions is CO2 mineralization. Mineralization stores CO2 by converting it into a thermodynamically stable solid. Beyond storing CO2, the products of CO2 mineralization can potentially substitute conventional products in several industries. Substituting conventional production increases both the economic and the environmental potential of carbon capture and utilization (CCU) by mineralization. The promising potential of CO2 mineralization is, however, challenged by the high energy demand required to overcome the slow reaction kinetics. To provide a sound assessment of the climate impacts of CCU by mineralization, we determine the carbon footprint of CCU by mineralization based on life cycle assessment. For this purpose, we analyze 7 pathways proposed in literature: 5 direct and 2 indirect mineralization pathways, considering serpentine, olivine, and steel slag as feedstock. The mineralization products are employed to partially substitute cement in blended cement. Our results show that all considered CCU technologies for mineralization could reduce climate impacts over the entire life cycle based on the current state-of-the-art and today's energy mix. Reductions range from 0.44 to 1.17 ton CO2e per ton CO2 stored. To estimate an upper bound on the potential of CCU by mineralization, we consider an ideal-mineralization scenario that neglects all process inefficiencies and utilizes the entire product. For this ideal mineralization, mineralization of 1 ton CO2 could even avoid up to 3.2 times more greenhouse gas emissions than only storing CO2. For all mineralization pathways, the carbon footprint is mainly reduced due to the permanent storage of CO2 and the credit for substituting conventional products. Thus, developing suitable products is critical to realize the potential benefits in practice. Then, carbon capture and utilization by mineralization could provide a promising route for climate change mitigation.

Graphical abstract: Rock ‘n’ use of CO2: carbon footprint of carbon capture and utilization by mineralization

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Article information


Submitted
04 Feb 2020
Accepted
26 Feb 2020
First published
30 Apr 2020

This article is Open Access

Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2020,4, 4482-4496
Article type
Paper

Rock ‘n’ use of CO2: carbon footprint of carbon capture and utilization by mineralization

H. Ostovari, A. Sternberg and A. Bardow, Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2020, 4, 4482 DOI: 10.1039/D0SE00190B

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.


Social activity

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements