Jump to main content
Jump to site search


Classical and nonclassical effects in surface hopping methodology for simulating coupled electronic-nuclear dynamics

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the detailed quantum-classical behavior of two alternative approaches to simulating molecular dynamics with electronic transitions: the popular fewest switches surface hopping (FSSH) method, introduced by Tully in 1990 [Tully, \textit{J.~Chem.~Phys.}, 1990, \textbf{93}, 1061] and our recently developed quantum trajectory surface hopping (QTSH) method [Martens, \textit{J.~Phys.~Chem.~A}, 2019 \textbf{123}, 1110]. Both approaches employ an independent ensemble of trajectories that undergo stochastic transitions between electronic surfaces. The methods differ in their treatment of energy conservation, with FSSH imposing conservation of the classical kinetic plus potential energy by rescaling of the classical momenta when a surface hop occurs, while QTSH incorporates quantum forces throughout the dynamics which lead naturally to the conservation of the full quantum-classical energy. We investigate the population transfer and energy budget of the surface hopping methods for several simple model systems and compare with exact quantum result. In addition, the detailed dynamics of the trajectory ensembles in phase space are compared with the quantum evolution in the Wigner representation. Conclusions are drawn.

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 23 Apr 2019, accepted on 23 May 2019 and first published on 23 May 2019


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C9FD00042A
Faraday Discuss., 2019, Accepted Manuscript

  •   Request permissions

    Classical and nonclassical effects in surface hopping methodology for simulating coupled electronic-nuclear dynamics

    C. C. Martens, Faraday Discuss., 2019, Accepted Manuscript , DOI: 10.1039/C9FD00042A

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements