Issue 37, 2013

Do QTAIM metrics correlate with the strength of heavy element–ligand bonds?

Abstract

The bonding in monomeric and dimeric molecular compounds of Cr, Mo, W and U is explored using the Quantum Theory of Atoms-in-Molecules (QTAIM). The metal–ligand and metal–metal bond critical point properties ρb, ∇2ρb and Hb, and also the bond delocalisation indices δ(A, B), are correlated with the data from previous Ziegler–Rauk energy decomposition studies of the same systems. For M2X6 (M = Mo, W, U; X = Cl, F, OH, NH2, CH3), ρb, Hb and δ(A, B) display anticorrelations with the total interaction energy of the two MX3 fragments, implying that the weaker metal–metal bonds (those between two uranium atoms) are the more covalent ones. By contrast, strongly positive correlations are observed between the QTAIM parameters and the energy decomposition orbital mixing energies. This is also the case for metal–carbon, metal–nitrogen and metal–oxygen bonds in (CO)5M–imidazole tautomers (M = Cr, Mo, W) and uranyl phosphinimine and phosphine oxide compounds. These targets were chosen specifically because their energy decompositions feature negligible net electrostatic + Pauli “pre-relaxation” effects, and the QTAIM parameters correlate strongly with the orbital mixing-dominated total interaction energies. The metal–metal bonds in M2X6 are found to have significantly positive ∇2ρb (in agreement with many previous QTAIM studies of metal–metal bonding), and an anticorrelation is found between the total X3M–MX3 interaction energies and ∇2ρb. The positive ∇2ρb are traced to the dominant λ3 principal curvature, which correlates well with the destabilising electronic kinetic energy density at the bond critical points, providing a rationalisation of the anticorrelation between the total X3M–MX3 interaction energies and ∇2ρb.

Graphical abstract: Do QTAIM metrics correlate with the strength of heavy element–ligand bonds?

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
22 May 2013
Accepted
15 Jul 2013
First published
15 Jul 2013

Dalton Trans., 2013,42, 13477-13486

Do QTAIM metrics correlate with the strength of heavy element–ligand bonds?

A. R. E. Mountain and N. Kaltsoyannis, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 13477 DOI: 10.1039/C3DT51337H

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements