Issue 32, 2012

AFM adhesion imaging for the comparison of polyelectrolyte complexes and polyelectrolyte multilayers

Abstract

The adhesion and topography of dry surfaces treated with polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) and multilayers (PEMs) of PAH/PAA or CPAM/silica nanoparticles were studied using AFM adhesion mapping. PEMs gave higher adhesion than did PECs for the PAH/PAA system, but adhesion did not differ significantly between PEMs and PECs for the CPAM/silica system. The latter system displayed multiple release patterns, interpreted as disentanglements and tentatively ascribed to nanoparticle presence. AFM adhesion mapping is valuable for analysing PEC and PEM. The measurements should, however, be combined with separate force measurements for a more complete picture of the adhesion.

Graphical abstract: AFM adhesion imaging for the comparison of polyelectrolyte complexes and polyelectrolyte multilayers

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Communication
Submitted
10 May 2012
Accepted
19 Jun 2012
First published
12 Jul 2012

Soft Matter, 2012,8, 8298-8301

AFM adhesion imaging for the comparison of polyelectrolyte complexes and polyelectrolyte multilayers

C. Ankerfors, T. Pettersson and L. Wågberg, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 8298 DOI: 10.1039/C2SM26096D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements