Issue 8, 1995

Extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from highly contaminated soils: a comparison between Soxhlet, microwave and supercritical fluid extraction techniques

Abstract

A direct comparison between Soxhlet, microwave-assisted extraction and supercritical fluid extraction is made. Each technique was used to extract sixteen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from a native, contaminated soil. The total amounts of PAHs found were 297.4, 422.9 and 458.0 mg kg–1 using Soxhlet, microwave-assisted extraction and supercritical fluid extraction. The merits and disadvantages of each extraction technique is discussed.

Article information

Article type
Paper

Anal. Proc., 1995,32, 305-308

Extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from highly contaminated soils: a comparison between Soxhlet, microwave and supercritical fluid extraction techniques

J. R. Dean, I. J. Barnabas and I. A. Fowlis, Anal. Proc., 1995, 32, 305 DOI: 10.1039/AI9953200305

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements