Open Access Article
Yangyang
Zhong†
a,
Jie
Zeng†
c,
Mingwei
Li
a,
Yuli
Liang
c,
Shuman
Guan
a,
Kehan
Zhao
a,
Jiayi
Mu
a,
Pei
Tang
a,
Huijing
Wang
*a and
Fener
Chen
*abde
aSichuan Research Center for Drug Precision Industrial Technology, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. E-mail: wanghuijing@scu.edu.cn; rfchen@fudan.edu.cn
bInstitute of Flow Chemistry and Engineering, College of Chemistry and Materials, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330022, China
cPharmaceutical Research Institute, Wuhan Institute of Technology, 430205, Wuhan, China
dEngineering Center of Catalysis and Synthesis for Chiral Molecules, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai Engineering Center of Industrial, Shanghai, 200433, China
eAsymmetric Catalysis for Chiral Drugs, Shanghai 200433, China
First published on 23rd December 2025
Stereoselective glycosidic bond formation remains a major challenge in nucleoside synthesis. Azanucleosides, a prominent class of nucleoside analogs wherein the sugar oxygen is replaced by nitrogen, exhibit unique biological activities but struggle to achieve anomeric selectivity in synthesis. We disclose a catalyst-free iodocyclization strategy that uses simple achiral molecules—NaI or 2-mercaptobenzimidazole—to stereodivergently access both α- and β-azanucleosides in high yields (up to 98%) with excellent stereocontrol (β
:
α up to β only and α
:
β up to 19
:
1). The utility of this method is demonstrated by a concise synthesis of forodesine in 8 steps with 20% overall yield and >20
:
1 β
:
α selectivity—the shortest route and highest stereoselectivity reported to date. DFT studies reveal that hydrogen bonding/Na–O coordination and π–π stacking interactions govern the stereochemical outcomes. This work provides an efficient, scalable platform for accessing diverse azanucleoside therapeutics.
C-Glycosylation is the most widely used method for synthesizing C-nucleosides, including eletrophillic addition,25 nucleophilic addition,26–29 the Friedel–Crafts reaction,30,31 metal cross coupling,32–35 and radical-mediated reactions.36–40 Current strategies for synthesizing β-azanucleosides, as exemplified by the synthesis of forodesine, primarily involve constructing the key glycosidic bond through coupling reactions (Fig. 2A).41–47 To achieve milder reaction conditions, improved stereoselectivity and higher yields, various sugar donors have been developed, such as imines, nitrones, and azalactams. Among all reported synthetic routes to forodesine, the highest β
:
α selectivity is 8
:
1, with a maximum yield of 38%.47 The synthesis of galidesivir follows a similar strategy, focusing mainly on introducing the amine group at the C4 position of the purine ring.45 Nevertheless, existing intermolecular cross-coupling methods for β-azanucleosides face two major challenges: (1) the synthesis of azasugar donors is often complex, typically requiring at least five steps from furanose with low efficiency; (2) control over glycosidic bond stereoselectivity remains unsatisfactory and is highly dependent on auxiliary groups at the C2′ position of the glycosyl donor.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 (A) Current strategies to synthesize forodesine. (B) This work: catalyst-free, achiral modulator-controlled iodocyclization for stereoselective synthesis of α- and β-azanucleosides. | ||
Catalytic asymmetric halocyclization of alkenes has proven to be a powerful strategy for accessing stereodefined heterocycles while installing halogen handles for further functionalization.48–51 In our previous work, we established a chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed intramolecular iodocyclization system for the synthesis of furanose nucleosides, in which achiral additives (NaI or S
PPh3) were employed to modulate anomeric stereoselectivity.52 However, this system suffered from two critical limitations: it proved ineffective for synthesizing azanucleosides where the nucleophile is an NHR group, failing to deliver either α- or β-configured products with satisfactory stereocontrol (see SI Table S1); moreover, its reliance on a chiral phosphoric acid catalyst severely limited practicality and scalability. Indeed, industrial adoption of chiral phosphoric acid catalysts is often hampered by the high cost associated with the six-step synthesis from BINOL. The global environmental factor (EG factor) highlights environmental drawbacks in synthetic systems by quantifying waste generation across the full lifecycle, including catalyst synthesis and reaction processes.53,54 Reducing the use of expensive chiral catalysts represents a straightforward approach to minimize the EG factor.
To address these challenges, we have developed a fundamentally distinct, catalyst-free iodocyclization strategy. Stereodivergent synthesis of azanucleosides is achieved in the absence of any chiral catalyst, using only simple achiral modulators: NaI for α-selectivity and 2-mercaptobenzimidazole for β-selectivity (Fig. 2B). This approach not only avoids the cost and environmental burden associated with chiral catalysts but also successfully addresses the long-standing challenge of stereoselective azanucleoside formation. The resulting C2-iodinated products serve as versatile intermediates for further functionalization, enabling efficient access to both α- and β-azanucleosides, including a concise synthesis of forodesine. We believe that this method provides a robust and scalable platform for diversifying azanucleosides, which remain underexplored in medicinal chemistry.
In our previous work, NaI and S
PPh3 were identified as key additives for controlling the stereoselectivity of catalytic halocyclization by directing the reaction along specific pathways.52 Therefore, we first investigated the effect of S
PPh3 on stereochemical control (Table 1). Pleasingly, when S
PPh3 was used as an achiral modulator with NIS as the halogen source, β-nucleoside 6a was obtained as the major product (entry 1; β
:
α = 5
:
1). In contrast, when NaI was used as the modulator, the configuration inverted, affording α-nucleoside 7a with a β
:
α ratio of 1
:
10 (entry 3). The absolute configuration of 7a was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray crystallography (CCDC No. 2378539). The configuration of 6a was then assigned by comparing its NMR NOE (Nuclear Overhauser Effect) data with those of 7a. In the absence of any modulator, no stereocontrol was observed (entry 2). These results suggested that the thiocarbonyl group might be crucial for β-selectivity. We then screened various thiocarbonyl-containing compounds as β-selective modulators (see SI Table S2). Among them, 2-mercaptobenzoheterocycles exhibited excellent reactivities and stereoselectivities (entries 4–6). Notably, 2-mercaptobenzimidazole 10 afforded product 6a in high yield (up to 95%) with excellent β-selectivity (β
:
α = 25
:
1; entry 6). To verify the necessity of the thiocarbonyl group, control experiments with compounds 11, 12, and 13 were conducted (entries 7–9). These compounds showed almost no stereocontrol. We further optimized the reaction conditions to improve α-selectivity (see SI Table S3). By fine-tuning the solvent, high α-selectivity was achieved (β
:
α = 1
:
19, entry 10). In the absence of NaI, the diastereomeric ratio was only β
:
α = 1
:
3 (entry 11). Loading studies revealed that both NaI and 10 could promote stereoselective iodocyclization catalytically. High α-selectivity was maintained (β
:
α = 1
:
19), while β-selectivity slightly decreased (β
:
α = 1
:
14) under reduced loading of 10 (see SI Table S4).
| Entry | Variation from labeled conditions | Yieldb (%) |
β : α (6a : 7a)c |
|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: 5a (0.05 mmol), NIS (0.10 mmol), S PPh3 (0.05 mmol) in MeCN (2.5 mL), 0 °C for 1 h.
b Isolated yield.
c
β : α values were determined by HPLC.
|
|||
| 1 | None | 92 | 5 : 1 |
| 2 | No S PPh3 |
95 | 1 : 1 |
| 3 | NaI instead of S PPh3 |
85 | 1 : 10 |
| 4 |
8 instead of S PPh3 |
93 | 11 : 1 |
| 5 |
9 instead of S PPh3 |
95 | 10 : 1 |
| 6 |
10 instead of S PPh
3
|
95 |
25 : 1
|
| 7 |
11 instead of S PPh3 |
80 | 2 : 1 |
| 8 |
12 instead of S PPh3 |
82 | 5 : 1 |
| 9 |
13 instead of S PPh3 |
79 | 2 : 1 |
| 10 |
NaI instead of S PPh
3
, THF instead of MeCN
|
93 |
1 : 19
|
| 11 | No S PPh3, THF instead of MeCN |
90 | 1 : 3 |
We systematically evaluated the substrate scope under both β- and α-selective conditions, using a series of halocyclization substrates 5a–u bearing varied R1 groups and nucleobase structures (Fig. 3). Starting from model substrate 5a, the effect of different ester groups (R1
CO2Me, CO2t-Bu) was examined. Both β-azanucleosides 6b–c and α-azanucleosides 7b–c were obtained in high yields (>90%) with excellent stereoselectivity (β
:
α up to 24
:
1 and α
:
β up to 17
:
1). To closely mimic the azanucleoside structure, a hydroxymethyl group protected with various groups (TBS, TBDPS, MOM, and Bn) was introduced at the C4′ position. Substrates 5d–g performed well, affording β-azanucleosides 6d–g in high yields (>80%) with good stereocontrol (β
:
α up to 18
:
1) and α-azanucleosides 7d–g in high yields (>87%) with moderate stereocontrol (α
:
β up to 10
:
1). In the screening of nucleobase structures, we systematically examined the influence of substituents in 5H-pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine derivatives. Both mono-substituted derivatives at the C4-position (such as OEt, OtBu, Cl, H, NHBn, NHi-Pr, Ph, and 4-OMe-Ph) and disubstituted derivatives at the C2 and C4 positions generally exhibited good to excellent stereoselectivity under the optimized conditions. β-Azanucleosides 6h–r were formed with high selectivity (β
:
α up to β only) and high yields (>86%), except for 6k and 6o (β
:
α = 3
:
1). Similarly, α-azanucleosides 7h–r were mostly obtained with high selectivity (α
:
β up to 10
:
1), except for 7l (α
:
β = 2.5
:
1). Evaluation of N5-protecting groups (such as MOM and Bn) showed that they could direct the formation of the corresponding β-azanucleosides 6s–t and α-azanucleosides 7s–t with excellent stereoselectivities. Finally, preliminary evaluation of the 7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold confirmed the good compatibility of the reaction system.
To demonstrate scalability, β-nucleoside analogue 6a and α-nucleoside analogue 7a were synthesized on a gram scale from 5a (Fig. 4). Both yields and stereoselectivities were maintained: β-nucleoside 6a was obtained in 93% yield with β
:
α > 20
:
1, and α-nucleoside 7a in 90% yield with α
:
β > 15
:
1.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 Gram-scale synthesis of β-azanucleoside 6a and α-azanucleoside 7avia catalyst-free, achiral modulator-controlled iodocyclizations. | ||
Using this β-selective iodocyclization as the key step, we developed an efficient asymmetric synthesis of forodesine and a formal synthesis of galidesivir. As shown in Scheme 2, forodesine was synthesized in 20% overall yield over eight steps from commercially available glycine Schiff base 1. Starting from the β-selective iodocyclization product 6a, one-pot reductive debenzylation and halide elimination smoothly afforded compound 14 in 75% yield. Stereospecific syn-dihydroxylation of 14 with OsO4, followed by deprotection, gave compound 15. Treatment of 15 with HCl in methanol then furnished forodesine. Following literature procedures,45 functional group modifications of the base moiety in forodesine, followed by deprotection, provided the bioactive compound galidesivir. To the best of our knowledge, this work provides the shortest route to forodesine (8 steps vs. 10 in prior reports) and the highest β
:
α selectivity (>20
:
1 vs. 8
:
1).
To demonstrate the versatility of our method and its potential for constructing compound libraries in medicinal chemistry, we performed diverse derivatizations on both β- and α-azanucleosides (Scheme 3). Specifically, β-nucleoside 6a underwent reductive elimination with NaBH4/DBU, affording alkene 14 in 75% yield. Removal of the Ns group under 1-mercaptooctane/t-BuOK conditions gave 17 in 87% yield. Subsequent reflux of 17 in concentrated HCl/MeOH furnished 18 in 72% yield. Alternatively, hydrogenation of 17 followed by deprotection afforded the C2′ and C3′-unsubstituted azanucleoside 20 in 60% yield over two steps. For the α-azanucleoside series, treatment of 7a with DIBAL-H and subsequent Ns deprotection provided 21 in 72% yield. Radical-mediated deiodination of 21 yielded 22, while DBU-promoted elimination afforded alkene 23 in 74% yield. Treatment of 23 with concentrated HCl gave 24. Furthermore, 23 served as a key intermediate for the stereoselective synthesis of target compound 25. This was achieved via Boc protection of the C4′ hydroxymethyl group, dihydroxylation of the C2′–C3′ alkene (occurring exclusively from the β-face to give the corresponding diol), and final Boc deprotection.
To gain a thorough understanding of the reaction mechanism, especially on the effect of two achiral molecules, NaI and 2-mercaptobenzimidazole 10, density functional theory (DFT) studies were performed at the PBE0 level,66 using alkene 5a as a model substrate (Fig. 5). The α-selective iodocyclization starts from Int1 (−4.6 kcal mol−1). We used the interaction region indicator (IRI)67,68 to analyze the interactions between atoms of Int1 (IRI pic. of Int1). Interestingly, NaI in Int1 is identified as a centered role, cooperating with Ns and ester carbonyl oxygen through Na–O interactions. And Ns can stabilize NIS through π…π stacking, allowing NIS to attack substrates from the top face. These interactions provide a favorable spatial environment for α-selectivity. The electrophilic addition of I− to 5a and meanwhile H+ being transferred to the N atom result in Int2 with a reaction barrier of 22.5 kcal mol−1. The following nucleophilic cyclization occurs to generate PS, which is exergonic by 25.1 kcal mol−1. In the β-selective iodocyclization pathway, the IRI result of Int3 reveals that due to the hydrogen bonding interaction, the thiol 10 consistently occupies the region above the C
C bond throughout the reaction. Due to the steric effect, the I− from NIS attacks the alkene from the bottom face only, resulting in β-selectivity. Finally, nucleophilic cyclization is found to be exergonic by 16.9 kcal mol−1, and the reaction barrier is 32.5 kcal mol−1 (Int3 to PR).
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 Calculated free energy profile for the formation of nucleosides with α- and β-configurations from substrate 5a and other reactants. | ||
:
α > 20
:
1, 8 steps, 20% overall yield). To our knowledge, few existing methods achieve such stereocontrol using solely achiral molecules in the absence of chiral catalysts, particularly in nucleoside synthesis. This work not only expands fundamental chemical understanding but also provides access to underexplored azanucleosides for therapeutic development.
Additional data supporting the findings described in this paper are available in the supplementary information (SI) and available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Supplementary information: detailed experimental procedures, compound characterization data (including NMR spectra and HPLC chromatograms), and additional computational results. Supplementary information is available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc08431h.
Footnote |
| † These authors contributed equally to this work. |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026 |