Tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny core–shell composite particles and their electromagnetic absorption properties

Hong Li a, Hongyang Li *a, Ran Wang a, Shentao Zeng b, Ruiling Xie a, Cui Luo b and Ying Liu a
aSchool of Materials, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China. E-mail: lihongyang@bit.edu.cn
bShanghai Aerospace Control Technology Institute, Shanghai, China

Received 8th July 2025 , Accepted 31st October 2025

First published on 24th November 2025


Abstract

By the combination of chemical liquid-phase reduction, in situ self-oxidation and thermal treatment, tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny core–shell composite magnetic particles were synthesized, and their microstructure, static magnetic properties, and electromagnetic wave absorption performance were investigated. Results show that the tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles largely retained the morphology of thorny Co@Fe@Fe3O4 particles, but some particles are aggregated, resulting in an increase in the particle size. The tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles exhibit a typical core–shell structure with an internal core and 200–300 nm thick external coating. The center of the particle contains Co, while the outer layer comprises Fe and O. With heat treatment, a discernible transition phase of CoFe and Co7Fe3 was formed at the Co/Fe interface. With the increase in self-oxidation temperature, the specific saturation magnetization of the Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 particles exhibits a slight increase before a downward trend, while the coercivity decreases slightly and then increases. At an oxidation temperature of 70 °C, the tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples exhibit optimal absorption performance, with a minimum reflection loss of −24.42 dB at a coating thickness of 1.6 mm and a maximum effective absorption bandwidth of 4.80 GHz.


1 Introduction

Electromagnetic wave absorption materials are a class of functional materials capable of effectively absorbing and attenuating the energy of incident electromagnetic waves. The primary mechanism underlying the absorption of electromagnetic waves in these materials involves the conversion of electromagnetic energy into thermal energy or other forms of energy dissipation through dielectric loss, magnetic loss, and impedance matching characteristics.1–4

Dielectric loss arises from the polarization relaxation of electric dipoles within the material under the influence of an alternating electromagnetic field. This polarization process exhibits a phase difference relative to the external electromagnetic field, resulting in the conversion of electromagnetic energy into thermal energy, which is subsequently dissipated. Magnetic loss occurs through irreversible magnetic hysteresis, magnetic domain movement, and phenomena such as magnetic resonance within the material under an alternating magnetic field, leading to the conversion of magnetic energy into thermal energy or other forms of energy, thereby facilitating effective absorption of electromagnetic wave energy.5–10

Magnetic wave-absorbing materials constitute an important component of the electromagnetic wave absorption material system and primarily consist of magnetic metals or their alloys, ferrites, and other components with magnetic loss characteristics. Compared with dielectric wave-absorbing materials or other types of absorbers, magnetic wave-absorbing materials offer significant advantages, including high magnetic permeability, broad bandwidth absorption, low reflection loss, and excellent impedance matching properties.11–14 These materials can generate significant hysteresis loss, eddy current loss, and natural resonance loss under the influence of high-frequency electromagnetic fields, effectively dissipating electromagnetic wave energy. Simultaneously, their synergistic control over complex magnetic permeability and complex permittivity facilitates better impedance matching with free space, reducing the reflection of electromagnetic waves at the material's surface and enhancing the absorption efficiency.15–18

Cobalt, as an important magnetic material, possesses a high Curie temperature, excellent magnetic crystalline anisotropy, and good chemical stability, making it widely applicable in fields such as magnetic storage, sensors, and permanent magnets.19–21 As an absorber material, cobalt exhibits favorable magnetic permeability, permittivity, and impedance matching characteristics, while also demonstrating improved thermal stability at elevated temperatures, thereby optimizing its wave absorption performance. These properties highlight cobalt's significant application prospects and immense potential in electromagnetic wave absorption, stealth technology, and electromagnetic shielding.22–25

Extensive research indicates that core–shell structured particles exhibit superior performance in the domain of wave-absorbing materials. This exceptional capability primarily stems from their unique structural design, which effectively regulates the matching characteristics of electromagnetic parameters and enhances the loss capacity of electromagnetic waves through interface polarization and multiple scattering mechanisms.26–28 Compared to single-layer-coated core–shell structures, multilayer-coated core–shell structures offer advantages such as more complex interface designs, greater flexibility in tuning electromagnetic parameters, and optimized impedance matching characteristics. By incorporating various loss mechanisms, such as conductive loss, relaxation loss, and resonance loss, these multilayer structures can further enhance the wave absorption performance of the materials.29–32

Sun et al.33 successfully synthesized novel CuNC composite CMOF particles by embedding copper nanoclusters (CuNC) into cobalt/zinc (Co/Zn) CMOF. When the matching thickness was 2.30 mm, the RLmin reached −45.1 dB, and when the thickness was 3.10 mm, the EAB reached 8.80 GHz. Liu et al.34 successfully synthesized a Co@CoO@microwave-irradiated porous carbon (MPC) composite material with a bilayer core–shell structure, with RLmin reaching −30 dB and EAB reaching 5.7 GHz. Sun et al.35 modified magnetic permalloy particles by coating 2-methylimidazole cobalt salt (ZF-67) and 2-methylimidazole zinc salt (ZF-8). Composite particles of PM@ZIF67, PM@ZIF8, PM@ZIF67@ZIF8 and PM@ZIF8@ZIF67, with different core–shell structures, were successfully synthesized. Their minimum reflection loss and effective absorption bandwidth reached −47.3 dB and 5.3 GHz at thicknesses of 3.8 mm and 5.5 mm, respectively.

Moreover, studies have demonstrated that particle structures with unconventional geometries (e.g., thorny or flowered shapes) significantly enhance the electromagnetic wave absorption performance. This improvement is primarily attributed to their unique morphological features, which effectively manipulate the propagation pathways of electromagnetic waves and mechanisms of energy dissipation.36–38 Irregular structures can increase the specific surface area and the number of interfaces within the material, which, in turn, enhances the multiple reflections and scatterings of electromagnetic waves within the material. This leads to extended propagation paths of electromagnetic waves and improved energy loss efficiency. Additionally, structures with thorny or flowered formations can introduce more tip effects and localized electric field concentrations, thereby enhancing the local polarization effect and dielectric loss. Furthermore, the geometric asymmetry of these irregular structures can disrupt the electromagnetic isotropy of the material, optimizing magnetic anisotropy and domain structures to enhance magnetic loss capacity. Therefore, irregular particle structures demonstrate significant application potential in the design of wave-absorbing materials.39–41

However, research on heterogeneous cobalt-based multilayer core–shell structured wave-absorbing materials remains relatively limited, particularly regarding the specific case of three-layer coated heterogeneous cobalt-based core–shell materials, for which significant reports are yet to be seen.42–45 This paucity of research largely arises from the complexities associated with the fabrication processes of multilayer core–shell structures, including the selection of materials for each layer, interface compatibility, and structural stability. Due to the absence of systematic experimental data and theoretical analyses, the scientific inquiries into the electromagnetic wave absorption mechanisms, interface effects, and multi-interface synergistic interactions of three-layer coated heterogeneous cobalt-based core–shell structures have yet to be thoroughly explored. This research gap not only limits a deeper understanding of the relationship between the microstructure and macroscopic properties of cobalt-based composite wave-absorbing materials but also hinders their further development and application in the field of wave-absorbing materials.

In light of this, the present study focuses on multilayer-coated heterogeneous cobalt-based wave-absorbing materials. Through chemical liquid-phase deposition, high-temperature heat treatment, and in situ self-oxidation, we prepared tri-layer coated Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 composite particles and compared the effects of different self-oxidation temperatures on the electromagnetic wave absorption performance of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 composite particles. This study aims to provide valuable insights for the systematic investigation of tri-layer coated heterogeneous cobalt-based core–shell structured wave-absorbing materials, as well as contribute to the theoretical development and practical applications of cobalt-based wave-absorbing materials.

2 Preparation and characterization of tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles

2.1 Preparation of tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles

The preparation of tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles started with the synthesis of thorny Co particles. Cobalt(II) sulfate heptahydrate (CoSO4·7H2O) was dissolved to prepare a CoSO4 solution, and potassium sodium tartrate (C4H4O6KNa·4H2O) was dissolved to form a C4H4O6KNa solution. Then, the two solutions were mixed fully. The temperature of the reaction mixture was controlled at 50 °C with an ultrasonic generator. Under mechanical stirring and ultrasonic vibration, concentrated hydrazine hydrate (N2H4·H2O) solution was added to the reaction mixture, facilitating a rapid reaction that yielded thorny Co particles. The reaction equations are as follows:
 
Co2+ + n(C4O6H4)2− ↔ [CO(C4O6H4)]2−2nn(1)
 
[CO(C4O6H4)]2−2nn + 3N2H4 → [CO(N2H4)3]2+ + n(C4O6H4)2−(2)
 
[CO(N2H4)3]2+ + N2H4 + OH → Co↓ + N2↑ + H2↑ + NH3 + O(3)

Building upon this, a specific mass of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·7H2O), potassium sodium tartrate (C4H4O6KNa·4H2O), and trisodium citrate (C6H5Na3O7·2H2O) were dissolved in 500 mL of deionized water to form the coating solution. Sodium borohydride (NaBH4) was dissolved to prepare the reducing solution. At a reaction temperature of 50 °C, the reducing solution was added to the coating solution, followed by washing with deionized water to obtain Co@Fe particles. The chemical reactions are represented as follows:

 
Fe2+ + n(C4O6H4)2− ↔ [Fe(C4O6H4)2−2nn](4)
 
[Fe(C4O6H4)2−2nn] + 2BH4 + 6H2O → Fe↓ + 2B(OH)3 + 7H2↑ + n(C4O6H4)2−(5)

Based on this, sodium nitrite (NaNO2) was used as the oxidizing agent, and an appropriate amount of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was added to adjust the pH. The Co@Fe particles undergo self-oxidation in the water bath environment at temperatures of 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C, resulting in partial oxidation to Fe3O4 and yielding dual-layer thorny Co@Fe@Fe3O4 particles. The chemical reaction equations for this process are:

 
3Fe + NaNO2 + 5NaOH → 3Na2FeO2 + NH3↑ + H2O(6)
 
6Na2FeO2 + NaNO2 + 5H2O → 3Na2FeO2 + NH3↑ + 7NaOH(7)
 
Na2FeO2 + Na2FeO4 + 2H2O → Fe3O4 + 4NaOH(8)

For the dual-layer Co@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles, heat treatment was performed at 500 °C for 1 hour, and tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles were finally produced. The heat-treated particles are designated as 50 °C-R, 60 °C-R, 70 °C-R, and 80 °C-R, respectively.

2.2 Characterization of tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles

The Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 composite particles were observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The crystallographic structure of the samples was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The static magnetic properties of the prepared samples were measured with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), and the electromagnetic wave absorption properties were studied with a vector network analyzer.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Morphology and phase structure of tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles

Fig. 1 shows SEM images of thorny Co and thorny Co@Fe particles. The thorny Co particles demonstrate a nearly equiaxed morphology, featuring a surface adorned with numerous sharp, thorny protrusions, and possess a particle diameter ranging approximately from 3 to 5 µm. The thorny Co@Fe particles, synthesized from the thorny Co particles, retain the geometric configuration of the initial thorny Co particles. In contrast to the original sword-shaped Co particles, the surface protrusions of the thorny Co@Fe particles remain pronounced, albeit with their tips being somewhat blunted.
image file: d5qm00489f-f1.tif
Fig. 1 SEM images of (a) Co particles and (b) Co@Fe particles.

Fig. 2 presents the SEM images of thorny Co@Fe@Fe3O4 particles with in situ self-oxidation at 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C water-bath temperatures. It can be seen that during the self-oxidation process, the thorny Co@Fe@Fe3O4 particles are further passivated at the tip, and the surface becomes less smooth at the same time, which is mainly due to part of the Fe3O4 that formed in the in situ self-oxidation process entering the solution.


image file: d5qm00489f-f2.tif
Fig. 2 SEM images of thorny Co@Fe@Fe3O4 particles with different in situ self-oxidation temperature (a) 50 °C; (b) 60 °C; (c) 70 °C; and (d) 80 °C.

Fig. 3 presents SEM images of the tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles. It can be observed that these particles have largely retained the morphology of the Co@Fe@Fe3O4 particles. However, during the heat-treatment process in the preparation of Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 from Co@Fe@Fe3O4 particles, some particles aggregated, resulting in an increase in the particle size.


image file: d5qm00489f-f3.tif
Fig. 3 SEM images showing the morphology of tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles prepared with different in situ self-oxidation temperatures: (a and b) 50 °C; (c and d) 60 °C; (e and f) 70 °C; and (g and h) 80 °C.

To further investigate the internal material characteristics of tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles, Fig. 4 presents SEM images and cross-sectional EDS analysis results of the tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles obtained with a focused ion beam (FIB). In Fig. 4(b), it can be seen that the Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 particles exhibit a typical core–shell structure with an internal core and 200–300 nm thick external coating. The EDS line scan results obtained from the FIB cross-section (Fig. 4(c)) indicate that the center of the particle contains Co, while the outer layer is composed of Fe and O. Fig. 4(d)–(f) show the elemental distribution maps of Co, Fe, and O within the particle, demonstrating that Fe and O are mainly located in the outer layer.


image file: d5qm00489f-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Thorny Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 particles prepared under oxidation at 70 °C: (a) SEM image; (b) cross-sectional SEM image; (c) elemental distribution line scan; and (d)–(f) element analysis maps.

3.2 Phase structure of tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles

Fig. 5 presents the XRD patterns of Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles. Compared to standard cards for FCC-Co (PDF#15-0806), HCP-Co (PDF#05-0727), Fe3O4 (PDF#88-0866), CoFe (PDF#44-1433), Co7Fe3 (PDF#50-0795), and Fe (PDF#06-0696), the XRD patterns of the particles that underwent heat treatment at oxidation temperatures of 70 °C and 80 °C exhibit characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ = 30.1°, 35.5°, 57.1°, and 62.5°, corresponding to the (220), (311), (511), and (440) crystal planes of Fe3O4, respectively. For the particles that were heat-treated with oxidation temperatures of 50 °C and 60 °C, the characteristic diffraction peaks previously corresponding to the (220), (511), and (400) planes of Fe3O4 disappeared, leaving only the (311) plane observable. The diffraction peak at 2θ = 45.1° corresponds to the (110) planes of CoFe, α-Fe, and Co7Fe3, while the peak at 2θ = 65.7° corresponds to the (200) planes of CoFe and Co7Fe3. The peak at 2θ = 83.1° corresponds to the (211) planes of CoFe and Co7Fe3. The XRD results indicate that the heat treatment of the Co@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles produced the CoFe and Co7Fe3 compounds, which exhibit higher saturation magnetization. As CoFe and Co7Fe3 form at the Co/Fe interface, it is suggested that one of the two original interfaces in the particles has become indistinct due to the heat treatment, which is likely the Co/Fe interface.
image file: d5qm00489f-f5.tif
Fig. 5 XRD patterns of tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles.

3.3 Magnetic properties of tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles

Fig. 6 illustrates the hysteresis loops of the tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles. Table 1 summarizes the saturated magnetization (Ms), coercive force (Hc), and remnant magnetization (Mr) values obtained from the hysteresis loops of theCo@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 particles.
image file: d5qm00489f-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Hysteresis loops of tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles.
Table 1 Static magnetic properties of tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles
Sample M s (emu g−1) H c (Oe) M r (emu g−1)
50 °C-R 166.4 74.0 7.6
60 °C-R 171.2 67.7 7.6
70 °C-R 173.2 87.4 7.2
80 °C-R 154.6 96.0 9.5


As shown in Table 1, with the increase in self-oxidation temperature, the specific saturation magnetization of the particles exhibits a slight increase before showing a downward trend, while the coercivity decreases slightly and then increases. This behavior can be attributed to the static magnetic properties of Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4, which are primarily influenced by the four components: Co, CoxF1−x, Fe, and Fe3O4. Through in situ self-oxidation, Fe3O4 with lower saturation magnetization and higher coercivity is introduced into the Co@Fe particles. As the oxidation temperature rises, the content of Fe3O4 gradually increases, leading to a decrease in specific saturation magnetization and an increase in coercivity. Additionally, during the high-temperature heat-treatment process, the formation of CoFe and Co7Fe3 phases at the Co/Fe interface also influences the specific saturation magnetization and coercivity, so the observed decrease in specific saturation magnetization and increase in coercivity exhibit fluctuations.

3.4 Electromagnetic wave absorption properties of tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles

3.4.1 Complex dielectric constant and complex permeability of tri-layer Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles. Fig. 7 illustrates the variations of the real part of the complex dielectric constant (ε′) and the imaginary part of the complex dielectric constant (ε″) for the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples within the frequency range of 2–18 GHz.
image file: d5qm00489f-f7.tif
Fig. 7 (a) Real part of the dielectric constant ε′ and (b) imaginary part of the dielectric constant ε″ for Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny samples.

From the figure, it can be observed that the real part of the complex dielectric constant (ε′) for the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny samples displays a gradually decreasing trend with increasing frequency of electromagnetic waves. Specifically, under oxidation temperatures of 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C, the ranges of the ε′ values for the samples are 10.04–9.42, 10.12–9.85, 11.14–9.80, and 9.85–8.78, respectively. As the oxidation temperature increases, the maximum ε′ value of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny samples first increases and then decreases. Within the frequency range of 2–14 GHz, the sample treated at an oxidation temperature of 70 °C exhibits the highest ε′ value, indicating superior charge storage capability. In the range of 14–18 GHz, the ε′ value of the samples of 60 °C is the highest, suggesting enhanced charge storage ability in this frequency range.

In the same frequency range (2–18 GHz), the ε″ values for the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny samples at oxidation temperatures of 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C are in the ranges of 0.22–0.66, 0.41–1.46, 0.72–1.34, and 0.56–0.67, respectively. With increasing oxidation temperature, the ε″ values also exhibit a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. Within the range of 2–15.44 GHz, the samples treated at 70 °C show the highest ε″ values, featuring two pronounced dielectric resonances at 8.8 GHz and 14.16 GHz. In the frequency range of 15.44–18 GHz, the samples with 60 °C exhibit higher ε″ values.

Fig. 8 illustrates the behaviors of the real part of complex permeability (μ′) and the imaginary part of complex permeability (μ″) for the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny samples in the frequency range of 2–18 GHz.


image file: d5qm00489f-f8.tif
Fig. 8 (a) Real part of permeability μ′ and (b) imaginary part of permeability μ″ for Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny samples.

The results indicate that with the increase of electromagnetic wave frequency, the real part of complex permeability (μ′) presented a decreasing trend, and in the frequency range of 2–10 GHz, at oxidation temperatures of 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C, the μ′ values for the samples are basically the same, with the differences being relatively small. In the range of 10–18 GHZ, the differences of samples with different in situ self-oxidation temperatures gradually increased, and the real part of complex permeability (μ′) of the in situ self-oxidation samples at 60 °C was the lowest. The real part of complex permeability (μ′) of the in situ self-oxidation samples at 80 °C was relatively high, and the whole real part of complex permeability (μ′) of the samples ranged from 1.54 to 0.99.

In the frequency range of 2–14 GHz, the imaginary part of complex permeability (μ″) for the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny samples exhibits a decreasing trend at oxidation temperatures of 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C. In the range of 14–18 GHz, the μ″ values for the samples treated at 50 °C and 80 °C remain stable, whereas the μ″ value for the samples treated at 70 °C shows a slight increase, and a substantial decrease is noted for the samples treated at 60 °C.

3.4.2 Dielectric loss and magnetic loss of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles. Fig. 9 shows the variations of dielectric loss (tan[thin space (1/6-em)]δe) and magnetic loss (tan[thin space (1/6-em)]δm) values of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples as a function of electromagnetic wave frequency within the range of 2–18 GHz. The maximum dielectric loss values (tan[thin space (1/6-em)]δe) for samples at oxidation temperatures of 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C were found to be 0.069, 0.152, 0.133, and 0.078, respectively. Correspondingly, the maximum magnetic loss values (tan[thin space (1/6-em)]δm) were 0.303, 0.295, 0.311, and 0.271. This indicates that both dielectric loss and magnetic loss mechanisms coexist in the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples. The magnetic loss (tan[thin space (1/6-em)]δm) values of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples in the 2–18 GHz frequency were greater than the dielectric loss (tan[thin space (1/6-em)]δe) values, indicating that magnetic loss remains the primary contributor to electromagnetic wave attenuation for the samples.
image file: d5qm00489f-f9.tif
Fig. 9 (a) Dielectric loss (tan[thin space (1/6-em)]δe) and (b) magnetic loss (tan[thin space (1/6-em)]δm) of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples.

Within the 2–18 GHz frequency range, the tan[thin space (1/6-em)]δe value exhibited minimal variation; however, the values across most frequency bands presented increasing trends. In the frequency range of 2–12 GHz, the magnetic loss decreases with the increase in the in situ self-oxidation temperature, and the regularity is no longer obvious in the frequency range of 12–18 GHz.

3.4.3 Electromagnetic wave loss mechanism of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles. Fig. 10 presents the Cole–Cole curves of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples. Multiple semi-circular arcs were observed in all samples, indicating a pronounced dielectric relaxation polarization phenomenon. The presence of linear portions at the ends of the Cole–Cole arcs in all four sample groups indicates the existence of conduction losses in the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples.
image file: d5qm00489f-f10.tif
Fig. 10 Cole–Cole curves of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples at (a) 50 °C, (b) 60 °C, (c) 70 °C, and (d) 80 °C.

For the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles, diffusion between Co and Fe led to the formation of the CoxFe1−x phase, resulting in the generation of Co/CoxFe1−x and CoxFe1−x/Fe interfaces. Simultaneously, the oxidation of the Fe surface resulted in the formation of a Fe3O4 layer, establishing a Fe/Fe3O4 interface that significantly facilitated interfacial polarization in the particles.

Fig. 11(a) displays the magnetic loss C0 and the decay constant α of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples. The C0 values of the samples exhibited a monotonous decreasing trend across the 2–18 GHz frequency range, with no significant fluctuations. Notably, within the 2–6 GHz range, the decline occurred rapidly, suggesting that magnetic loss in this frequency range is primarily dominated by natural resonance. In the 6–18 GHz range, the decrease in C0 values slowed, indicating the possible contribution of eddy current losses in this frequency band.


image file: d5qm00489f-f11.tif
Fig. 11 (a) Magnetic loss C0, and (b) decay constant α of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples.

Fig. 11(b) presents the decay constants α of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples. It is evident that with increasing frequency, the α values of the samples gradually increase, and the maximum α values at oxidation temperatures of 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C were recorded as 195.32, 201.71, 218.60, and 188.94, respectively. At an oxidation temperature of 70 °C, the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles exhibited the highest decay constant α, demonstrating that the material had the strongest attenuation capability.

3.4.4 Impedance matching of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles. Fig. 12 illustrates the relationship between the reflection loss and impedance matching (Z values) of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples. As shown in Fig. 12(a)–(d), the minimum reflection losses corresponding to the impedance matching Z values for the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples at oxidation temperatures of 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C are 1.26, 1.21, 1.12, and 1.38, respectively. With an increase in oxidation temperature, the impedance matching Z values of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples exhibit a trend of initially decreasing and then increasing. When the oxidation temperature is set at 70 °C, the impedance matching Z value of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle sample is relatively close to 1, indicating a better impedance matching performance.
image file: d5qm00489f-f12.tif
Fig. 12 Reflection loss versus impedance matching curve of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples under self-oxidation at (a) 50 °C, (b) 60 °C, (c) 70 °C, and (d) 80 °C and (e) Z value curve.

As shown in Fig. 12(e), it can be observed that at oxidation temperatures of 50 °C, 60 °C, and 80 °C, the Z values of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples deviate significantly from the effective Z value range (0.8–1); the Z value at an oxidation temperature of 70 °C was relatively better. The optimization of impedance matching allows more electromagnetic waves to penetrate into the interior of the particles, which will be helpful for enhancing the electromagnetic wave absorption properties.

3.4.5 Reflection loss and effective absorption bandwidth of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles. Fig. 13 presents the reflection loss curve and 3D plot of the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples, while Table 2 summarizes the electromagnetic wave absorption performance statistics for these samples. The data indicate that at an oxidation temperature of 70 °C, the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples exhibit optimal absorption performance, with a minimum reflection loss of −24.42 dB at a coating thickness of 1.6 mm. Within the frequency range of 2–18 GHz, the maximum effective absorption bandwidth of the samples is 4.80 GHz. At the same time, the effective absorption bandwidth and minimum reflection loss of the in situ self-oxidation samples at 50 °C, 60 °C and 80 °C are 4.56 GHz, 4.64 GHz, and 4.16 GHz, and −18.75 dB, −20.20 dB, and −16.05 dB, respectively. Although the effective absorption bandwidth and minimum reflection loss are lower than those of the samples at 70 °C, the coating thickness is thinner than that at 70 °C, the corresponding sample thicknesses are 1.5 mm, 1.4 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively. It is clear that for Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles, different processing processes can be selected to prepare electromagnetic wave absorbing materials with wider effective absorption bandwidth and smaller minimum reflection or thinner coating, according to the application requirement.
image file: d5qm00489f-f13.tif
Fig. 13 Reflection loss curve and 3D plot of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples under self-oxidation at (a)–(c) 50 °C, (d)–(f) 60 °C, (g)–(i) 70 °C, and (j)–(l) 80 °C.
Table 2 Electromagnetic wave absorption performance of Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles
Sample RLmin (dB) d (mm) EAB (GHz) Effective absorbing band (GHz)
50 °C-R −18.75 1.5 4.56 13.28–17.84
60 °C-R −20.20 1.4 4.64 13.36–18.00
70 °C-R −24.42 1.6 4.80 12.72–17.52
80 °C-R −16.05 1.5 4.16 13.84–18.00


4 Conclusion

By chemical liquid-phase reduction, in situ self-oxidation and heat treatment, core–shell structured Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny composite particles were prepared, and the microstructure, static magnetic properties and electromagnetic wave absorption performance of the particles were investigated.

(1) The tri-layer Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles largely retain the morphology of Co@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles, with a typical core–shell structure for the internal core and a 200–300 nm thick external coating. With heat treatment, a discernible transition phase of CoFe and Co7Fe3 was formed at the Co/Fe interface.

(2) With the increase in self-oxidation temperature, the specific saturation magnetization of the Co@CoxF1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particles exhibits a slight increase before a downward trend, while the coercivity decreases slightly and then increases.

(3) Within the 2–18 GHz frequency range, the tan[thin space (1/6-em)]δe value exhibited minimal variation; however, the values across most frequency bands presented increased trends. In the frequency range of 2–12 GHz, the magnetic loss decreases with the increase of in situ self-oxidation temperature, and the regularity is no longer obvious in the frequency range of 12–18 GHz.

(4) At an oxidation temperature of 70 °C, the Co@CoxFe1−x@Fe@Fe3O4 thorny particle samples exhibit optimal absorption performance, with a minimum reflection loss of −24.42 dB at a coating thickness of 1.6 mm, and the maximum effective absorption bandwidth is 4.80 GHz.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Data availability

Data will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express gratitude to teacher Lijie Li from School of materials of Beijing institute of technology for her valuable technical assistance in the experiments.

References

  1. Y. Guo, K. Ruan, G. Wang and J. Gu, Advances and mechanisms in polymer composites toward thermal conduction and electromagnetic wave absorption, Sci. Bull., 2023, 68, 1195–1212 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. Z. Wu, H.-W. Cheng, C. Jin, B. Yang, C. Xu and K. Pei, et al., Dimensional Design and Core–Shell Engineering of Nanomaterials for Electromagnetic Wave Absorption, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34, e2107538 CrossRef PubMed.
  3. M. Zhang, C. Han, W.-Q. Cao, M.-S. Cao, H.-J. Yang and J. Yuan, A Nano-Micro Engineering Nanofiber for Electromagnetic Absorber, Green Shielding and Sensor, Nano-Micro Lett., 2021, 13, 27 CrossRef.
  4. B. Wang, Q. Wu, Y. Fu and T. Liu, A review on carbon/magnetic metal composites for microwave absorption, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 86, 91–109 CrossRef CAS.
  5. M. Qin, L. Zhang and H. Wu, Dielectric Loss Mechanism in Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Materials, Adv. Sci., 2022, 9, 2105553 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. P. Xie, Y. Liu, M. Feng, M. Niu, C. Liu and N. Wu, et al., Hierarchically porous Co/C nanocomposites for ultralight high-performance microwave absorption, Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater., 2021, 4, 173–185 CrossRef CAS.
  7. J. Chen, J. Zheng, F. Wang, Q. Huang and G. Ji, Carbon fibers embedded with FeIII-MOF-5-derived composites for enhanced microwave absorption, Carbon, 2021, 174, 509–517 CrossRef CAS.
  8. Y. Wang, L. Yao, Q. Zheng and M.-S. Cao, Graphene-wrapped multiloculated nickel ferrite: A highly efficient electromagnetic attenuation material for microwave absorbing and green shielding, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 6751–6760 CrossRef CAS.
  9. H. Cheng, Y. Pan, X. Wang, C. Liu, C. Shen and D. W. Schubert, et al., Ni Flower/MXene-Melamine Foam Derived 3D Magnetic/Conductive Networks for Ultra-Efficient Microwave Absorption and Infrared Stealth, Nano-Micro Lett., 2022, 14, 63 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. H. Pang, Y. Duan, L. Huang, L. Song, J. Liu and T. Zhang, et al., Research advances in composition, structure and mechanisms of microwave absorbing materials, Composites, Part B, 2021, 224, 109173 CrossRef CAS.
  11. J. Wang, Z. Jia, X. Liu, J. Dou, B. Xu and B. Wang, et al., Construction of 1D Heterostructure NiCo@C/ZnO Nanorod with Enhanced Microwave Absorption, Nano-Micro Lett., 2021, 13, 175 CrossRef CAS.
  12. G. Qi, Y. Liu, L. Chen, P. Xie, D. Pan and Z. Shi, et al., Lightweight Fe3C@Fe/C nanocomposites derived from wasted cornstalks with high-efficiency microwave absorption and ultrathin thickness, Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater., 2021, 4, 1226–1238 CrossRef CAS.
  13. W. Tian, J. Li, Y. Liu, R. Ali, Y. Guo and L. Deng, et al., Atomic-Scale Layer-by-Layer Deposition of FeSiAl@ZnO@Al2O3 Hybrid with Threshold Anti-Corrosion and Ultra-High Microwave Absorption Properties in Low-Frequency Bands, Nano-Micro Lett., 2021, 13, 161 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. R. Cheng, Y. Wang, X. Di, Z. Lu, P. Wang and M. Ma, et al., Construction of MOF-derived plum-like NiCo@C composite with enhanced multi-polarization for high-efficiency microwave absorption, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2022, 609, 224–234 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. F. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Zhao, L. Cui, L. Gai and X. Han, et al., Controllable seeding of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes on three-dimensional Co/C foam for enhanced dielectric loss and microwave absorption characteristics, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 450, 138160 CrossRef CAS.
  16. S. Wei, T. Chen, Q. Wang, Z. Shi, W. Li and S. Chen, Metal-organic framework derived hollow CoFe@C composites by the tunable chemical composition for efficient microwave absorption, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2021, 593, 370–379 CrossRef CAS.
  17. R. Shu, J. Zhang, C. Guo, Y. Wu, Z. Wan and J. Shi, et al., Facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide/nickel-zinc ferrite composites as high-performance microwave absorbers in the X-band, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 384, 123266 CrossRef CAS.
  18. Y. Wang, H. Wang, J. Ye, L. Shi and X. Feng, Magnetic CoFe alloy@C nanocomposites derived from ZnCo-MOF for electromagnetic wave absorption, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 383, 123096 CrossRef CAS.
  19. F. Pan, L. Yu, Z. Xiang, Z. Liu, B. Deng and E. Cui, et al., Improved synergistic effect for achieving ultrathin microwave absorber of 1D Co nanochains/2D carbide MXene nanocomposite, Carbon, 2021, 172, 506–515 CrossRef CAS.
  20. F. Chen, S. Zhang, B. Ma, Y. Xiong, H. Luo and Y. Cheng, et al., Bimetallic CoFe-MOF@Ti3C2Tx MXene derived composites for broadband microwave absorption, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 431, 134007 CrossRef CAS.
  21. M. Yang, Y. Yuan, Y. Li, X. Sun, S. Wang and L. Liang, et al., Dramatically enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption of hierarchical CNT/Co/C fiber derived from cotton and metal-organic-framework, Carbon, 2020, 161, 517–527 CrossRef CAS.
  22. Y.-L. Wang, S.-H. Yang, H.-Y. Wang, G.-S. Wang, X.-B. Sun and P.-G. Yin, Hollow porous CoNi/C composite nanomaterials derived from MOFs for efficient and lightweight electromagnetic wave absorber, Carbon, 2020, 167, 485–494 CrossRef CAS.
  23. Z. Gao, D. Lan, L. Zhang and H. Wu, Simultaneous Manipulation of Interfacial and Defects Polarization toward Zn/Co Phase and Ion Hybrids for Electromagnetic Wave Absorption, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2106677 CrossRef CAS.
  24. X. Liang, Z. Man, B. Quan, J. Zheng, W. Gu and Z. Zhang, et al., Environment-Stable CoxNiy Encapsulation in Stacked Porous Carbon Nanosheets for Enhanced Microwave Absorption, Nano-Micro Lett., 2020, 12, 102 CrossRef CAS.
  25. Y. Han, M. He, J. Hu, P. Liu, Z. Liu and Z. Ma, et al., Hierarchical design of FeCo-based microchains for enhanced microwave absorption in C band, Nano Res., 2023, 16, 1773–1778 CrossRef CAS.
  26. L. Gai, H. Zhao, F. Wang, P. Wang, Y. Liu and X. Han, et al., Advances in core–shell engineering of carbon-based composites for electromagnetic wave absorption, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 9410–9439 CrossRef.
  27. S. Gao, Y. Zhang, H. Xing and H. Li, Controlled reduction synthesis of yolk-shell magnetic@void@C for electromagnetic wave absorption, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 387, 124149 CrossRef CAS.
  28. R. Shu, X. Yang and Z. Zhao, Fabrication of core–shell structure NiFe2O4@SiO2 decorated nitrogen-doped graphene composite aerogels towards excellent electromagnetic absorption in the Ku band, Carbon, 2023, 210, 118047 CrossRef CAS.
  29. X. Meng, Y. Liu, G. Han, W. Yang and Y. Yu, Three-dimensional (Fe3O4/ZnO)@C Double-core@shell porous nanocomposites with enhanced broadband microwave absorption, Carbon, 2020, 162, 356–364 CrossRef CAS.
  30. X. Zhou, Z. Jia, A. Feng, J. Kou, H. Cao and X. Liu, et al., Construction of multiple electromagnetic loss mechanism for enhanced electromagnetic absorption performance of fish scale-derived biomass absorber, Composites, Part B, 2020, 192, 107980 CrossRef CAS.
  31. Y. Liu, C. Tian, F. Wang, B. Hu, P. Xu and X. Han, et al., Dual-pathway optimization on microwave absorption characteristics of core–shell Fe3O4@C microcapsules: Composition regulation on magnetic core and MoS2 nanosheets growth on carbon shell, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 461, 141867 CrossRef CAS.
  32. K. Yang, Y. Cui, L. Wan, Q. Zhang and B. Zhang, MOF-derived magnetic-dielectric balanced Co@ZnO@N-doped carbon composite materials for strong microwave absorption, Carbon, 2022, 190, 366–375 CrossRef CAS.
  33. C. Sun, K. Y. Zhao, M. L. Huang, C. L. Luo, X. D. Chen and M. Wang, Structure regulating of metal clusters in carbonized metallic organic frameworks for high-efficient microwave absorption via tuning interaction strength between metals and ligands, Nano Res., 2024, 17, 1699–1709 CrossRef CAS.
  34. J. T. Liu, Y. C. Zheng, C. Y. Jiang, X. Hou, X. R. Feng and K. Jiang, et al., Cobalt–cobalt oxide doped lignin-based carbon materials for microwave absorption via microwave carbonization, Nano Res., 2025, 18, 94907640 CrossRef.
  35. C. Sun, K. Y. Zhao, M. L. Huang, C. L. Luo, X. D. Chen and H. J. Wu, et al., Heterointerface construction for permalloy microparticles through the surface modification of bilayer metallic organic frameworks: Toward microwave absorption enhancement, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2023, 644, 454–465 CrossRef CAS.
  36. Z. Feng, P. Yang, G. Wen, H. Li, Y. Liu and X. Zhao, One-step synthesis of MoS2 nanoparticles with different morphologies for electromagnetic wave absorption, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2020, 502, 144129 CrossRef CAS.
  37. L. Han, H. Yang, Y. Lin, H. Zhou, Z. Cai and Y. Qiu, MOF-derived flower-like CoFe@C composites for enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption, Ceram. Int., 2024, 50, 1341–1350 CrossRef CAS.
  38. J.-C. Shu, X.-Y. Huang and M.-S. Cao, Assembling 3D flower-like Co3O4-MWCNT architecture for optimizing low-frequency microwave absorption, Carbon, 2021, 174, 638–646 CrossRef CAS.
  39. W. Dai, F. Chen, H. Luo, Y. Xiong, X. Wang and Y. Cheng, et al., Synthesis of yolk–shell structured carbonyl iron@void@nitrogen doped carbon for enhanced microwave absorption performance, J. Alloys Compd., 2020, 812, 152083 CrossRef CAS.
  40. N. He, X. Yang, L. Shi, X. Yang, Y. Lu and G. Tong, et al., Chemical conversion of Cu2O/PPy core–shell nanowires (CSNWs): A surface/interface adjustment method for high-quality Cu/Fe/C and Cu/Fe3O4/C CSNWs with superior microwave absorption capabilities, Carbon, 2020, 166, 205–217 CrossRef CAS.
  41. X. Zhao, Y. Huang, X. Liu, J. Yan, L. Ding and M. Zong, et al., Core–shell CoFe2O4@C nanoparticles coupled with rGO for strong wideband microwave absorption, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2022, 607, 192–202 CrossRef CAS.
  42. Y.-L. Wang, P.-Y. Zhao, B.-L. Liang, K. Chen and G.-S. Wang, Carbon nanotubes decorated Co/C from ZIF-67/melamine as high efficient microwave absorbing material, Carbon, 2023, 202, 66–75 CrossRef CAS.
  43. W. Xue, G. Yang, S. Bi, J. Zhang and Z.-L. Hou, Construction of caterpillar-like hierarchically structured Co/MnO/CNTs derived from MnO2/ZIF-8@ZIF-67 for electromagnetic wave absorption, Carbon, 2021, 173, 521–527 CrossRef CAS.
  44. D. Wu, Y. Wang, S. Deng, D. Lan, Z. Xiang and Q. He, Heterostructured CoFe@A-doped carbon porous polyhedron for efficient microwave absorption, Nano Res., 2023, 16, 1859–1868 CAS.
  45. F. Wu, Z. Liu, J. Wang, T. Shah, P. Liu and Q. Zhang, et al., Template-free self-assembly of MXene and CoNi-bimetal MOF into intertwined one-dimensional heterostructure and its microwave absorbing properties, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 422, 130591 CrossRef CAS.

This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2026
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.