Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Suppression of the metal-to-semiconductor transition in nanocrystalline Ti4O7 via crystallite size control

Tomoko Kubotaa, Riku Seikia, Takahiro Kondoab, Verdad C. Agultoc, Makoto Nakajimac, Shin-ichi Ohkoshid and Hiroko Tokoro*ad
aDepartment of Materials Science, Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences University of Tsukuba 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573, Japan. E-mail: tokoro.hiroko.gp@u.tsukuba.ac.jp
bTsukuba Institute for Advanced Research (TIAR) University of Tsukuba 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan
cInstitute of Laser Engineering The University of Osaka 2-6 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
dDepartment of Chemistry, School of Science The University of Tokyo 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan

Received 13th December 2025 , Accepted 21st January 2026

First published on 23rd February 2026


Abstract

Nanocrystalline Ti4O7 with controlled crystallite sizes was synthesized to investigate the effect of crystallite size on the metal–semiconductor transition. Magnetic susceptibility measurements revealed that the transition fraction for Ti4O7 with an average crystallite size of 11 nm was approximately 60% of that observed for Ti4O7 with a crystallite size of 30 nm, indicating suppression of the phase transition. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that the observed transition enthalpies were 302 J mol−1 and 850 J mol−1 for the smaller and larger crystallite sizes, respectively, showing a reduction in the transition enthalpy with decreasing crystallite size. Thermodynamic calculations suggest that this suppression arises from surface energy contributions, which reduce the transition enthalpy with decreasing crystallite size. These results indicate that reducing the crystallite size offers an effective means of controlling the metal–semiconductor transition in Ti4O7, contributing to the development of tunable phase-transition materials for advanced functional materials.


Introduction

Magnéli phase titanium oxides, with the general formula TinO2n−1 (3 ≤ n ≤ 9), represent a fascinating class of materials known for their diverse functional properties, including electrical conductivity,1–7 electrochemical performance,8–24 heat storage capability,25–36 and switching behavior.37–42 Among these, Ti4O7 is particularly noteworthy, as it exhibits metallic behavior at room temperature and possesses the highest electrical conductivity of any known metal oxide. Owing to these exceptional properties, Ti4O7 has attracted significant attention for potential applications in fuel cells and electrode catalysts, prompting extensive research in these areas.8–10,12,14,17–22 The single crystal of Ti4O7 undergoes a two-step phase transition involving metallic, disordered, and ordered semiconductor phases as a function of temperature.1,2,43–47 At room temperature, Ti4O7 exists in a high-temperature (HT) metallic phase. Upon cooling to 150 K, it undergoes a transition to an intermediate-temperature (IT) semiconductor phase, followed by a further transition at 130 K to a low-temperature (LT) ordered semiconductor phase (Fig. 1). In the HT phase, all the Ti atoms adopt a Ti3.5+ state in a charge-delocalized system. In contrast, the IT phase is a charge-localized state comprising distinct Ti3+ and Ti4+ ions. The transition from the IT to the LT phase corresponds to an order–disorder transition, where the randomly distributed Ti3+ and Ti4+ ions become arranged in an ordered configuration. These transitions are designated phase transition I (HT → IT) and phase transition II (IT → LT), respectively. Theoretical studies have predicted the emergence of superconductivity in Ti4O7,48–50 spurring efforts to realize superconductivity by applying pressure to the semiconductor LT phase or by stabilizing the metallic HT phase at room temperature.51,52 Since the 1970s, extensive efforts have been made to control the phase transitions in Ti4O7 via vanadium substitution.43,53–56 Although these studies did not succeed in stabilizing the HT metallic phase at low temperatures, they did report the suppression of phase transition II. More recently, in 2017, introducing oxygen vacancies into Ti4O7 thin films was reported to suppress phase transition I and II, thereby retaining the metallic phase at low temperatures and inducing superconductivity.57 In 2020, we demonstrated that reducing the crystallite size of Ti4O7 to approximately 50 nm suppresses phase transition II, resulting in a simplified, one-step phase transition via phase transition I only.58
image file: d5ma01459j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of the two-step phase transition in a single crystal of Ti4O7. The high-temperature (HT) metallic phase transforms into an intermediate-temperature (IT) semiconductor at approximately 150 K (phase transition I), followed by a second transition to a low-temperature (LT) semiconductor phase near 130 K (phase transition II). In the HT phase, Ti ions exhibit a mixed valence state of Ti3.5+, and separate into Ti3+ and Ti4+ ions in the IT and LT phases.

In this study, we investigated the effect of crystallite size on phase transition I by synthesizing Ti4O7 nanocrystals with further reduced dimensions. Starting from titanium chloride, a precursor was synthesized and subsequently subjected to annealing via hydrogen reduction to obtain Ti4O7 samples with average crystallite sizes of 11 and 30 nm. Temperature-dependent measurements revealed that smaller crystallite sizes led to a more pronounced suppression of the phase transition. Thermodynamic modelling using a mean-field approximation suggested that this suppression arises from the contribution of surface energy to the Gibbs free energy.

Results and discussion

Materials and characterization

A mixed solution containing 420 mL of H2O, 1.40 mL of TiCl4, and 9.60 mL of aqueous NH3 (25 wt%) was prepared in a 1-L container. The solution was stirred at 50 °C for 20 h in an oil bath, forming Ti(OH)4 precipitates (eqn (1)).35 These precipitates were separated by centrifugation, washed with ethanol, and dried at 60 °C for 24 h,
 
TiCl4 + 4H2O + 4NH3 → Ti(OH)4 + 4NH4Cl. (1)

The resulting precipitate was then calcined under hydrogen flow for 5 h under two different conditions: 1.0 dm3 min−1 at 950 °C for 1 and 0.5 dm3 min−1 at 1000 °C for 2, forming a black powder,

 
4Ti(OH)4 + H2 → Ti4O7 + 9H2O. (2)

X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis confirmed the composition of the resulting powders to be Ti4.00(8)O7.00(8); Calc.: Ti, 63.1 wt%. Found: Ti, 63.1(8) wt% for 1, and Ti4.00(8)O7.00(8); Calc.: Ti, 63.1 wt%. Found: Ti, 63.0(6) wt% for 2.

Crystallite size and morphology

Room-temperature X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns and Rietveld analysis confirmed that the synthesized samples of 1 and 2 were pure Ti4O7 with a triclinic crystal structure (space group: P[1 with combining macron] (Fig. 2a and b). The refined lattice parameters were as follows: 1: a = 5.5980(5) Å, b = 7.1294(5) Å, c = 12.4514(10) Å, α = 95.070(6)°, β = 95.068(5)°, γ = 108.837(4)°, V = 464.87(6) Å3, and for 2: a = 5.5983(2) Å, b = 7.1241(2) Å, c = 12.4606(3) Å, α = 95.057(2) °, β = 95.147(2) °, γ = 108.777(2)°, V = 465.00(2) Å3 (Tables S1–S4). These lattice parameters were consistent with those reported for Ti4O7.45,47,58,59 The crystallite sizes, estimated by Rietveld analyses, were 11.1 ± 0.2 nm for 1 and 29.6 ± 0.4 nm for 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images revealed that both samples exhibited coral-like morphologies with dimensions of 0.73 ± 0.30 µm in the major axis and 0.30 ± 0.12 µm in the minor axis for 1, and 0.76 ± 0.24 µm in the major axis and 0.41 ± 0.15 µm in the minor axis for 2 (Fig. 3 and Fig. S1). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) confirmed that both samples consisted of sintered crystallites several tens of nanometers in size and that the crystallites of 2 were larger than those of 1 (Fig. S2). Combining XRD, Rietveld analysis, and SEM imaging, 1 was found to consist of secondary particles with a size of approximately 0.7 µm in the major axis and 0.3 µm in the minor axis, composed of primary crystallites of approximately 11 nm (Fig. 3a). In contrast, 2 comprised secondary particles with a size of approximately 0.8 µm in the major axis and 0.4 µm in the minor axis, built from primary crystallites of approximately 30 nm. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) profiles recorded at room temperature are shown in Fig. 2c and Fig. S3, and S4. The observed binding energy peaks at 458.0 eV (Fig. 2c), 463.8 eV (Fig. 2c), and 529.4 eV (Fig. S3 and S4) correspond to Ti 2p3/2, Ti 2p1/2, and O 1s, respectively. These values are consistent with those reported for the HT phase of bulk Ti4O7,29,60 indicating that the Ti centers in the synthesized Ti4O7 (1 and 2) exhibit a valence state of +3.5 at room temperature, characteristic of the metallic phase (Fig. S5).
image file: d5ma01459j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Crystal structure and valence state of nanocrystalline Ti4O7. (a) Schematic representation of the crystal structure of Ti4O7. (b) XRD pattern and Rietveld analysis for (i) 1 and (ii) 2. Blue circles indicate the observed data, black lines represent the calculated patterns, grey lines show the difference between observed and calculated data, and vertical bars mark the expected Bragg reflection positions for Ti4O7 (green) and the Si internal standard (grey). (c) XPS spectra of the Ti 2p peak for (i) 1 and (ii) 2. Blue markers indicate the observed data, red lines represent the fitted peaks using a Voigt function, and black dashed lines show the background.

image file: d5ma01459j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 SEM image (left) and schematic representation of particle morphology (right) for (a) 1 and (b) 2.

Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility

The temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility (χM) curves for 1 and 2 are shown in Fig. 4a and b, respectively. For both samples, χM decreases upon cooling, indicating a transition attributed to phase transition I, where the HT phase (Ti3.5+) transforms into the IT phase comprising Ti3+ and Ti4+. Defining the transition temperature as the temperature at which 50% of the transition occurs, the transitions for 1 were observed at 138 K (cooling) and 140 K (heating), whereas for 2, these were observed at slightly higher temperatures at 146 K (cooling) and 147 K (heating). The transition amplitude in 1 was approximately 60% of that observed in 2.
image file: d5ma01459j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 χM versus temperature plot per mole of Ti4O7 for (a) 1 and (b) 2, measured under an external magnetic field of 5000 Oe with a temperature sweep rate of ± 1.0 K min−1.

Calorimetric measurement of the phase transition

To investigate the phase transition observed in the temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility, DSC measurements were performed to quantify the enthalpy change (Fig. 5). An endothermic peak was observed at 144 K for 1 and at 149 K for 2. These peak positions aligned with the transition temperatures derived from magnetic susceptibility, confirming that 2 transitions occur at higher temperatures than for 1. The observed transition enthalpies (ΔHobs) were 302 ± 16 J mol−1 for 1 and 850 ± 33 J mol−1 for 2, corresponding to approximately 15% and 43% of the values reported for bulk single crystals.6 These results suggest that the transition enthalpy decreases with decreasing crystallite size.
image file: d5ma01459j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 DSC curves during the heating process for (a) 1 and (b) 2, recorded at a temperature sweep rate of ± 20 K min−1.

Thermodynamic calculation for nano-crystalline Ti4O7

In this study, phase transition II was suppressed, and only phase transition I was observed. The transition fraction for 1 was approximately 60% of that for 2, and the transition temperature was slightly lower for 1. To understand this behavior, the Slichter-Drickamer (SD) model, a mean-field approximation equation that thermodynamically describes phase transitions,61 was employed. In the SD model, the Gibbs free energy (G) is defined using the following equation: G = x ΔHtrans + γ x(1 − x) + T{R[x ln x + (1 − x) ln (1 − x)] − x ΔStrans}. Here, ΔHtrans and ΔStrans are the transition enthalpy and entropy, respectively, and x represents the fraction of Ti4O7 units in the metallic phase, whereas (1 − x) corresponds to the semiconductor phase fraction. γ is the interaction parameter between the metallic and semiconductor phase units, and R is the gas constant. Based on the experimentally observed ΔHobs and ΔSobs values from DSC measurements for 1 and 2, the calculated Gibbs free energy curves at various temperatures are shown in Fig. 6a and Fig. 6b, respectively. These curves showed that at high temperatures, the metallic phase is thermodynamically more stable (SI, S6). However, as the temperature decreases, a shift occurs, and below approximately 130 K, the semiconductor phase becomes more stable. The calculated transition temperatures were 146 K for 1 and 148 K for 2. Although slight, this difference is consistent with magnetic susceptibility measurements, which similarly showed a slightly higher transition temperature of 2.
image file: d5ma01459j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Temperature-dependent Gibbs free energy (G) versus metallic-phase fraction (x) curves between the charge-delocalized and charge-localized phases for (a) 1 and (b) 2, calculated using the Slichter-Drickamer mean-field model at 2 K intervals from 170 K to 130 K (upper panels). Enlarged views around the phase transition region are shown in the lower panel. The curve for 1 corresponds to 146 K, and that for 2 to 148 K. The thermodynamic parameters used were: ΔHtrans = 500 J mol−1, ΔStrans = 3.36 J K−1 mol−1, and γ = 2500 J mol−1 for 1; and ΔHtrans = 850 J mol−1, ΔStrans = 5.67 J K−1 mol−1, and γ = 2500 J mol−1 for 2. The transition fraction of 1 is 60% of that of 2. In the calculation, ΔHtrans was set to 500 J mol−1 for 1, which corresponds to the transition enthalpy value assuming the same fraction of transition as in 2.

Next, the effect of crystallite size distribution on the phase transition was considered. Assuming an average crystallite size of 11 nm for 1 and 30 nm for 2, which possess the size distributions shown in Fig. S7, we investigated the effect of the size variation. Based on our previous findings for trititanium pentoxide,35 where ΔHtrans was observed to vary approximately linearly with particle size, we used the expected ΔHtrans values (inset in Fig. S7) in SD model calculations (SI, S8). As shown in Fig. 7, the calculated transition fraction for 1 was approximately 60% of that for 2, consistent with experimental observations. These results indicate that crystallite size strongly influences phase transition behavior. Specifically, phase transition I is progressively suppressed as the crystallite size decreases.


image file: d5ma01459j-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Temperature dependence of the calculated fraction using the SD model, incorporating the effect of particle size distribution. The particle size distributions were assumed to follow a Gaussian distribution, with a mean size of 11.1 ± 0.2 nm for (a) 1 and 29.6 ± 0.4 nm for (b) 2 (Fig. S7).

Conclusions

In this study, Ti4O7 with a controlled nanoscale crystallite size was synthesized, and the effect of crystallite size on the metal–semiconductor transition (phase transition I) of Ti4O7 was investigated. The temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility measurements revealed that the transition fraction for the sample with an average crystallite size of 11 nm (1) was approximately 60% of that for the sample with an average crystallite size of 30 nm (2). This suppression of the phase transition is attributed to the nanoscale effect, where a reduction in crystallite size leads to a decrease in the transition enthalpy owing to the surface energy contributions. Control over phase transitions, phenomena that critically govern the functional properties of solid materials, remains a major challenge in materials science. This study suggests that the metal–semiconductor transition in Ti4O7 can be effectively suppressed by reducing the crystallite size to the tens-of-nanometers scale. Based on an aqueous titanium chloride precursor, the synthesis method offers the potential to synthesize metal-substituted compounds using various metal chlorides. Therefore, the combined strategy of crystallite size control with metal substitution presents a promising route to stabilizing high-temperature metallic phases at lower temperatures.

Experimental section

Measurements: elemental analysis was performed using XRF with a RIGAKU ZSX Primus IV instrument (Energy resolution: 8.3 eV for Ti and 6.9 eV for O). The sample morphologies were measured using SEM (JEOL JSM-7500FA; spatial resolution: 1.4 nm) and TEM (JEOL JEM 2010F; spatial resolution: 0.23 nm). XRD patterns were collected using a Rigaku Ultima IV instrument with a Cu Kα light source (λ = 1.5418 Å). The 2θ step width was set at 0.02°, and the maximum deviation from the true peak position was 0.0028°. Rietveld analyses of the XRD patterns were performed using Rigaku PDXL software. The XRD patterns were calibrated using Si powder.62 XPS spectra were recorded at room temperature using a JPS 9010 TR instrument (JEOL, Ltd, Japan; energy resolution: 1.05 eV) equipped with an ultrahigh-vacuum chamber and an Al Kα X-ray source (1486.6 eV). Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) was performed using an Advantest TAS7500 system. Magnetic measurements were performed using a Quantum Design MPMS superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer (magnetic moment resolution: 10−8 emu). The enthalpy changes associated with the phase transition were determined using a Rigaku DSC system (Thermo plus EVO2; thermal resolution: 0.1 µW), with liquid nitrogen (N2) employed as the cooling medium.

Author contributions

T. K. conducted the sample synthesis, characterization, data analysis, and calculations, and contributed to the manuscript preparation. R. S. performed sample synthesis and characterization. T. K. also assisted with XPS measurements and their analysis. V. C. A. and M. N. performed THz conductivity measurements. S. O. contributed to data analysis. H. T. designed and supervised the study, contributed to all measurements and calculations, and wrote the manuscript. All authors participated in discussions and revision of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Supplementary information (SI): crystallographic data, size distribution, TEM images, XPS spectra, THz conductivity spectrum, temperature dependence of Gibbs free energy, Gaussian distribution of the crystallite size, and relationship between Gibbs free energy, crystallite size, and transition enthalpy. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ma01459j.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by the Japan Science and Technology FOREST Program (JPMJFR213Q), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (22H02046), Scientific Research (A) (25H00866), Scientific Research (A) (24H00317), Transformative Research Areas (24H02232) from JSPS KAKENHI, and the JST Advanced Technologies for Carbon-Neutral (JPMJAN23A2). We are grateful to Prof. Asuka Namai for valuable technical support. We also acknowledge the support of the Cryogenic Research Center and the Center for Nano Lithography & Analysis at the University of Tokyo, which was supported by MEXT.

References

  1. R. F. Bartholomew and D. R. Frankl, Electrical properties of some titanium oxides, Phys. Rev., 1969, 187, 828–833 CrossRef CAS.
  2. S. Lakkis, C. Schlenker, B. K. Chakraverty, R. Buder and M. Marezio, Metal-insulator transitions in Ti4O7 single crystals: Crystal characterization, specific heat, and electron paramagnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. B: Solid State, 1976, 14, 1429–1440 CrossRef CAS.
  3. J. R. Smith, R. L. Clarke and F. C. Walsh, Electrodes based on Magnéli phase titanium oxides: the properties and applications of Ebonex® materials, J. Appl. Electrochem., 1998, 28, 1021–1033 CrossRef CAS.
  4. B. Xu, H. Y. Sohn, Y. Mohassab and Y. Lan, Structures, preparation and applications of titanium suboxides, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 79706–79722 RSC.
  5. X. Wu, H. Wang and Y. Wang, A Review: Synthesis and applications of titanium sub-oxides, Materials, 2023, 16, 6874 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. M. G. Sensoy, R. W. Carpick, D. J. Srolovitz and A. M. Rappe, Manipulating the electrical properties of conductive substoichiometric titanium oxides, Phys. Rev. B, 2024, 109, 064106 CrossRef CAS.
  7. G. Hasegawa, T. Sato, K. Kanamori, K. Nakano and T. Yajima, Hierarchically porous monoliths based on N-Doped reduced titanium oxides and their electric and electrochemical properties, Chem. Mater., 2013, 25, 3504–3512 CrossRef CAS.
  8. S. Y. Huang, P. Ganesan, H. Y. Jung and B. N. Popov, Development of supported bifunctional electrocatalysts for unitized regenerative fuel cells applications, J. Power Sources, 2012, 198, 23–29 CrossRef CAS.
  9. T. Ioroi, Z. Siroma, N. Fujiwara, S. Yamazaki and K. Yasuda, Sub-stoichiometric titanium oxide-supported platinum electrocatalyst for polymer electrolyte fuel cells, Electrochem. Commun., 2005, 7, 183–188 CrossRef CAS.
  10. T. Ioroi, H. Senoh, S. Yamazaki, Z. Siroma, N. Fujiwara and K. Yasuda, Stability of corrosion-resistant Magnéli-phase Ti4O7-supported PEFMC catalysts at high potentials, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2008, 155, B321 Search PubMed.
  11. F. C. Walsh and R. G. A. Wills, The continuing development of Magnéli phase titanium sub-oxides and Ebonex® electrodes, Electrochim. Acta, 2010, 55, 6342–6351 CrossRef CAS.
  12. L. Zhang, J. Kim, J. Zhang, F. Nan, N. Gauquelin, G. A. Botton, P. He, R. Bashyam and S. Knights, Ti4O7 supported Ru@Pt core-shell catalyst for CO-tolerance in PEM in PEM fuel cell hydrogen oxidation reaction, Appl. Energy, 2013, 103, 507–513 CrossRef CAS.
  13. X. Tao, J. Wang, Z. Ying, Q. Cai, G. Zheng, Y. Gan, H. Huang, Y. Xia, C. Liang, W. Zhang and Y. Cui, Strong sulfur binding with conducting Magnéli-phase TinO2n−1 nanomaterials for improving lithium-sulfur batteries, Nano Lett., 2014, 14, 5288–5294 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. Q. Pang, D. Kundu, M. Cuisinier and L. F. Nazar, Surface-enhanced redox chemistry of polysulphides on a metallic and polar host for lithium-sulfur batteries, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 4759 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. L. Guo, Y. Jing and B. P. Chaplin, Development and characterization of ultrafiltration TiO2 Magnéli phase reactive electrochemical membranes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2016, 50, 1428–1436 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. S. Mei, C. J. Jafta, I. Lauermann, Q. Ran, M. Kärgell, M. Ballauff and Y. Lu, Porous Ti4O7 particles with interconnected-pore structure as a high-efficiency polysulfide mediator for lithium-sulfur batteries, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2017, 27, 1701176 CrossRef.
  17. K. B. Ibrahim, W. N. Su, M. C. Tsai, S. A. Chala, A. W. Kahsay, M. H. Yeh, H. M. Chen, A. D. Duma, H. Dai and B. J. Hwang, Robust and conductive Magnéli Phase Ti4O7 decorated on 3D-nanoflower NiRu-LDH as high-performance oxygen reduction electrocatalyst, Nano Energy, 2018, 47, 309–315 CrossRef CAS.
  18. J. E. Won, D. H. Kwak, S. B. Han, H. S. Park, J. Y. Park, K. B. Ma, D. H. Kim and K. W. Park, PtIr/Ti4O7 as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for improved oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions, J. Catal., 2018, 358, 287–294 CrossRef CAS.
  19. S. Lee, G. H. Lee, J. C. Kim and D. W. Kim, Magnéli-phase Ti4O7 nanosphere electrocatalyst support for carbon-free oxygen electrodes in lithium-oxygen batteries, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 2601–2610 CrossRef CAS.
  20. T. Ioroi, Z. Siroma, S. Yamazaki and K. Yasuda, Electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cells, Adv. Energy Mater., 2019, 9, 1801284 CrossRef.
  21. H. Lin, R. Xiao, R. Xie, L. Yang, C. Tang, R. Wang, J. Chen, S. Lv and Q. Huang, Defect engineering on a Ti4O7 electrode Ce3+ doping for the efficient electrooxidation of perfluorooctanesulfonate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2021, 55, 2597–2607 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. X. Cao, C. Wei, X. Zheng, K. Zeng, X. Chen, M. H. Rummeli, P. Strasser and R. Yang, Ru clusters anchored on Magnéli phase Ti4O7 nanofibers enables flexible and highly efficient Li-O2 batteries, Energy Storage Mater., 2022, 50, 355–364 CrossRef.
  23. W. Yang, T. Chen, H. Jia, J. Li and B. Liu, Preparation and electrochemical applications of Magnéli phase titanium suboxides: A Review, Chem. – Eur. J., 2024, 30, e202402188 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. Z. Li, Y. Mu, Q. Zhang, H. Huang, X. Wei, L. Yang, G. Wang, T. Zhao, G. Wu and L. Zeng, Constructing highly durable reversal-tolerant anodes via integrating high-surface area Ti4O7 supported Pt and Ir@IrOx for proton exchange membrane fuel cells, Energy Environ. Sci., 2024, 17, 1580–1591 RSC.
  25. H. Tokoro, M. Yoshikiyo, K. Imoto, A. Namai, T. Nasu, K. Nakagawa, N. Ozaki, F. Hakoe, K. Tanaka, K. Chiba, R. Makiura, K. Prassides and S. Ohkoshi, External stimulation-controllable heat-storage ceramics, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 7037 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. Y. Zhang, X. Li, J. Li, C. Ma, L. Guo and X. Meng, Solor-driven phase change microencapsulation with efficient Ti4O7 nanoconverter for latent heat storage, Nano Energy, 2018, 53, 579–586 CrossRef CAS.
  27. M. Wang, W. Huang, Z. Shen, J. Gao, Y. Shi, T. Lu and Q. Shi, Phase evolution and formation of λ phase in Ti3O5 induced by magnesium doping, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 774, 1189–1194 CrossRef CAS.
  28. S. Ohkoshi, H. Tokoro, K. Nakagawa, M. Yoshikiyo, F. Jia and A. Namai, Low-pressure-responsive heat storage ceramics for automobiles, Sci. Rep., 2019, 9, 13203 CrossRef PubMed.
  29. Y. Araki, S. Ohkoshi and H. Tokoro, Synthesis of λ-Ti3O5 nanocrystals using a block copolymer, Mater. Today Energy, 2020, 18, 100525 CrossRef CAS.
  30. Y. Nakamura, Y. Sakai, M. Azuma and S. Ohkoshi, Long-term heat-storage ceramics absorbing thermal energy from hot water, Sci. Adv., 2020, 6, eaaz5264 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. S. Jütten and T. Bredow, First-principles investigation of electronic properties and phase transition of Ti3O5, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2022, 126, 7809–7817 CrossRef.
  32. S. Ohkoshi, F. Jia, M. Yoshikiyo, K. Imoto, H. Tokoro, K. Nakagawa, Y. Maeno, A. Namai, R. Harada, K. Hattori, K. Kojima, K. Sugiura and T. Suganuma, Pressure effect on long-term heat storage ceramics based on Mg-substituted λ-Ti3O5, Mater. Adv., 2022, 3, 4824–4830 RSC.
  33. S. Ohkoshi, M. Yoshikiyo, J. MacDougall, Y. Ikeda and H. Tokoro, Long-term heat-storage materials based on λ-Ti3O5 for green transformation (GX), Chem. Commun., 2023, 59, 7875–7886 RSC.
  34. S. Jütten and T. Bredow, Doping effect on the electronic structure and heat-storage properties of Ti3O5, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2023, 127, 10445–10452 CrossRef.
  35. T. Kubota, R. Seiki, A. Fujisawa, A. F. Fadilla, F. Jia, S. Ohkoshi and H. Tokoro, Synthesis of heat storage ceramic λ-Ti3O5 using titanium chloride as the starting material, Mater. Adv., 2024, 5, 3832–3837 RSC.
  36. T. Otake, L. Wang, F. Jia, M. Yoshikiyo, K. Kawakami, A. Namai, H. Tokoro and S. Ohkoshi, Long−term heat−storage ceramics based on Zr-substituted λ-Ti3O5, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2024, e20240047 Search PubMed.
  37. S. Ohkoshi, Y. Tsunobuchi, T. Matsuda, K. Hashimoto, A. Namai, F. Hakoe and H. Tokoro, Synthesis of a metal oxide with a room−temperature photoreversible phase transition, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 539–545 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. D. S. Ko, S. Kim, T. Y. Ahn, S. D. Kim, Y. H. Oh and Y. W. Kim, Effect of the electrode materials on the resistive switching of Ti4O7, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2012, 101, 053502 CrossRef.
  39. A. Asahara, H. Watanabe, H. Tokoro, S. Ohkoshi and T. Suemoto, Ultrafast dynamics of photoinduced semiconductor-to-metal transition in the optical switching nano-oxide Ti3O5, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2014, 90, 014303 CrossRef CAS.
  40. H. Li, T. Zhou, S. Hu, Z. Su and Y. Yan, Ti6O11 nanofiber: A new material with robust switching characteristic for memories, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 312, 328–335 CrossRef CAS.
  41. C. Mariette, M. Lorenc, H. Cailleau, E. Collet, L. Guérin, A. Volte, E. Trzop, R. Bertoni, X. Dong, B. Lépine, O. Hernandez, E. Janod, L. Cario, V. Ta Phauoc, S. Ohkoshi, H. Tokoro, L. Patthey, A. Babic, I. Usov, D. Ozerov, L. Sala, S. Ebner, P. Böhler, A. Keller, A. Oggenfuss, T. Zmofing, S. Redford, S. Vetter, R. Follath, P. Juranic, A. Schreiber, P. Beaud, V. Esposito, Y. Deng, G. Ingold, M. Chergui, G. F. Mancini, R. Mankowsky, C. Svetina, S. Zerdane, A. Mozzanica, A. Bosak, M. Wulff, M. Levantino, H. Lemke and M. Cammarata, Strain wave pathway to semiconductor-to-metal transition revealed by time-resolved X-ray powder diffraction, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 1239 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  42. Y. Hu, H. Mba, M. Picher, H. Tokoro, S. Ohkoshi, C. Mariette, R. Mandal, M. Alsahoor, P. Rabiller, M. Lorenc and F. Banhart, Phase transformations of individual Ti3O5 nanocrystals studied by In Situ electron microscopy, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2024, 128, 13991–13997 CrossRef CAS.
  43. C. Schlenker and M. Marezio, The order−disorder transition of Ti3+−Ti3+ pairs in Ti4O7 and (Ti1−xVx)4O7, Philos. Mag. B, 1980, 42, 453–472 Search PubMed.
  44. C. Schlenker, S. Lakkis, J. M. D. Coey and M. Marezio, Heat capacity and metal-insulator transitions in Ti4O7 single crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1974, 32, 1318–1321 CrossRef CAS.
  45. M. Marezio, D. B. McWhan, P. D. Dernier and J. P. Remeika, Structural aspects of the metal-insulator transitions in Ti4O7, J. Solid State Chem., 1973, 6, 213–221 Search PubMed.
  46. M. Marezio, D. B. McWhan, P. D. Dernier and J. P. Remeika, Charge localization at metal-insulator transitions in Ti4O7 and V4O7, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1972, 28, 1390–1393 CrossRef CAS.
  47. M. Marezio, P. D. Dernier, D. B. McWhan and J. P. Remeika, X-ray diffraction studies of the metal-insulator transitions in Ti4O7, V4O7, and VO2, Mat. Res. Bull., 1970, 5, 1015–1024 CrossRef CAS.
  48. R. Macnas, J. Ranninger and S. Robaszkiewicz, Superconductivity in narrow-band systems with local nonretarded attractive interactions, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1990, 62, 113–171 CrossRef.
  49. L. J. De Jongh, A Comparative Study of (Bi)Polaronic (Super)Conductivity in High- and Low-Tc Superconducting Oxides, Physica C, 1988, 152, 171–216 CrossRef CAS.
  50. B. K. Chakraverty, Possibility of insulator to superconductor phase transition, J. Phys., Lett., 1979, 40, 99–100 CrossRef CAS.
  51. H. Ueda, K. Kitazawa, H. Takagi and T. Matsumoto, Strong Carrier Concentration Dependence of Pressure Effect on Bipolaronic Transitions in Magnéli Phase in TinO2n−1 (n = 4, 5, 6), J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 2002, 71, 1506–1510 CrossRef CAS.
  52. T. Tonogai, H. Takagi, C. Murayama and N. Mori, Metal-insulator transitions in Ti4O7: Pressure-induced melting of the electron pairs, Rev. High Pressure Sci. Technol., 1998, 7, 453–455 CrossRef CAS.
  53. J. L. Hodeau and M. Marezio, Structural aspects of the metal-insulator transitions in (Ti0.9975V0.0025)4O7, J. Solid State Chem., 1979, 29, 47–62 CrossRef CAS.
  54. C. Schlenker, S. Ahmed, R. Buder and M. Gourmala, Metal-insulator transitions and phase diagram of (Ti1−xVx)4O7: electrical, calorimetric, magnetic and EPR studies, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., 1979, 12, 3503–3521 CrossRef CAS.
  55. S. Ahmed, C. Schlenker and R. Buder, Metal-insulator Transitions in (Ti1−xVx)4O7, J. Magn. Mag. Mater., 1978, 7, 338–340 CrossRef.
  56. C. Schlenker, S. Lakkis, S. Ahmed, J. L. Hodeau and M. Marezio, Metal-insulator transitions in (Ti1−xVx)4O7, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys, 1977, 10, L151–L156 CrossRef CAS.
  57. K. Yoshimatsu, O. Sakata and A. Ohmoto, Superconductivity in Ti4O7 and γ-Ti3O5 films, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 12544 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  58. H. Tokoro, Y. Araki, I. Nagata, T. Kondo, K. Imoto and S. Ohkoshi, Synthesis of nanosize tetratitanium heptoxide and its anomalous phase transition, Mater. Res. Lett., 2020, 8, 261–267 Search PubMed.
  59. D. Kundu, R. Black, E. J. Berg and L. F. Nazar, A highly active nanostructured metallic oxide cathode for aprotic Li–O2 batteries, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 1292–1298 RSC.
  60. M. Taguchi, A. Chainani, M. Matsunami, R. Eguchi, Y. Tanaka, K. Tamasaku, Y. Nishino, T. Ishikawa, S. Tsuda, S. Watanabe, C. T. Chen, Y. Senda, H. Ohashi, K. Fujiwara, Y. Nakamura, H. Takagi and S. Shin, Anomalous state sandwiched between fermi liquid and charge ordered mott-insulating phase of Ti4O7, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2010, 104, 106401 Search PubMed.
  61. C. P. Slichter and H. G. Drickamer, Pressure-induced electronic changes in compounds of iron, J. Chem. Phys., 1972, 56, 2142–2160 CrossRef CAS.
  62. Y. S. Touloukian, R. K. Kirby, R. E. Taylor and T. Y. R. Lee, Thermal expansion: nonmetallic solids, IFI/Plenum, New York, 1977 Search PubMed.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.