Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Detection and characterization of a compound 1 species from the c-type heme enzyme cytochrome cβ

Jared C. Parisa, Joline Nguyen b, Hyung J. Kimb and Michael P. Hendrich*a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, 4400 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. E-mail: hendrich@andrew.cmu.edu
bDivision of Physical Sciences, Chemistry, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, Washington 98012, USA

Received 9th May 2025 , Accepted 16th July 2025

First published on 28th July 2025


Abstract

Compound 1 is a key intermediate in a large group of enzymes containing heme b including cytochromes (cyt) P450, peroxidases and catalases. The extreme reactivity of this highly oxidized species has made its trapping and characterization challenging. Cyt cβ of the ammonia-oxidizing bacterium Nitrosomonas europaea is an enzyme containing heme c and a member of the P460 superfamily of cytochromes. Herein, a compound 1 species within the P460 superfamily was trapped and spectroscopically characterized with stopped-flow absorption, EPR and variable-field Mössbauer spectroscopy. Like horseradish peroxidase (HRP), Cyt cβ has an axial His coordinated to the heme iron with the compound 1 species exhibiting a green color with an absorption spectrum similar to that of HRP. Compound 1 from Cyt cβ features an antiferromagnetic exchange coupling between an S = 1 iron(IV)-oxo center and an S = ½ porphyrin radical, but with an exchange coupling constant that is significantly greater than that for HRP. The large variation in the exchange constant for both enzymes, despite both having the same axial ligand, indicates that this value is not strongly correlated to the axial ligand identity. Although the reaction of Cyt cβ with H2O2 was found to be significantly slower than other peroxidases, the lifetime of the compound 1 species was comparable to other heme enzymes that oxidize a variety of substrates, suggesting that the in vivo function of cyt cβ may not be relegated solely to the clearance of H2O2. Given its presence in an ammonia-oxidizing bacterium, cyt cβ could oxidize nitrogen containing substrates.


Introduction

The reaction of heme containing peroxidases with peroxide compounds has long been known to produce transient, highly oxidized iron porphyrin species that function as powerful biological oxidants.1–3 The primary intermediate, referred to as compound 1, is 2-oxidation equivalents above the resting ferric oxidation state, and composed of a ferryl (FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O) center and a porphyrin radical which gives the heme a green color. This is the cofactor state following heterolytic scission of the O–O bond of the iron bound peroxide; it is highly reactive, difficult to isolate, and serves as the catalytic intermediate for many difficult oxidative reactions in nature. Reduction of compound 1 by one electron from a nearby amino acid residue or substrate produces compound 2, which has a similar iron center as compound 1, but with the porphyrin radical being reduced, resulting in a heme that is red in color. Historically, the primary intermediate compound 1 species have been characterized in cytochromes bearing heme b, namely P450s, peroxidases and catalases. However, no compound 1 species from enzymes containing heme c have been kinetically characterized.

Cytochromes with heme c are distinguished from those with heme b by the heme-protein interaction. Cytochromes with heme b have their heme linked to the protein via the coordination of the axial amino acid side chain to the heme iron (e.g., S-Cys for cyt P450s, N-His for peroxidases, and O-Tyr for catalases).1 Besides the hydrophobic and polar interactions between the heme and the protein common in all heme-protein complexes,4 the coordination of the axial ligand to the heme iron is the only covalent linkage in cytochromes with heme b. This linkage influences the overall electronic structure of heme ferryl intermediates which in turn affects function. Green compound 1 species have an FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O center with an intermediate spin SFe = 1 coupled to a porphyrin π-orbital unpaired spin (SPor = 1/2); the net spin is described by the exchange coupling parameter (J, Hex = JS1·S2) which has been observed to be correlated with the heme axial ligand. The value of J based on EPR and Mössbauer observations is antiferromagnetic (J > 0) for cyt P450s, near zero for peroxidases, and ferromagnetic (J < 0) for catalases.5–7 Although all three proteins generate compound 1, they are not equivalent mechanistically, due at least in part to their axial ligands, surrounding residues, and electronic structures.

Cytochromes bearing heme c have additional linkages afforded by the amino acid sequence CXXCH heme binding motif where the two cysteine residues tether the heme via two thioether covalent bonds to the vinyl carbons of the porphyrin ring; the histidine residue in the motif coordinates to the heme iron (Fig. 1). Whether this difference in the heme-protein interaction influences the electronic structure of the compound 1 containing heme c has been unknown. We have characterized the one-electron oxidized FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O species of the cytochrome cβ (cyt cβ) from the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria Nitrosomonas europaea.8,9 Using optical and magnetic spectroscopy, we showed that a slight excess of H2O2 with manual mixing generated an optical spectrum indicative of compound 2. Although a significantly diminished Soret band suggestive of a porphyrin radical (compound 1) was observed prior to the compound 2 spectrum, EPR and Mössbauer analyses in the same time frame indicated an FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O porphyrin structure lacking the porphyrin radical; instead, a small amount of an organic radical could be detected. Nevertheless, cyt cβ showed peroxidase-like activity, albeit slow, with guaiacol, pyrogallol, and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid.


image file: d5sc03378k-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Heme c structure in cytochromes. The CXXCH motif is shown where the cysteines covalently bond to the vinyl carbons of the porphyrin.

N. europaea cyt cβ is a 19 kDa cytochrome characterized by an unusual β-sheet fold, in contrast to most cytochromes which are helical, placing it in the “P460” family of cytochromes10 that are present in bacteria that metabolize N-oxides (e.g. nitric oxide). The recent 1.8 Å crystal structure (Fig. 2A) revealed a 5-coordinate heme iron active site that possesses an Arg residue as the putative acid-base catalyst, replacing the conserved His–Arg pair in peroxidases (e.g. HRP, Fig. 2C).8,11 Furthermore, the conserved Asp residue near the proximal His ligand of peroxidases critical to providing imidazolate character during compound 1 formation is absent. Rather, the negative charge could be provided by a heme propionate in cyt cβ (Fig. 2A). Thus, our biochemical and structural data indicate that c-type hemes can generate ferryl intermediates, possibly with nuanced mechanistic and electronic variations compared to the ferryl species with heme b. This notion has broader implications to the widely distributed prototypical cytochrome with heme c, mitochondrial cytochrome c (cyt c), that shuttles electrons between two redox centers in electron transport chains (e.g., bc1 complex and cytochrome c oxidase of mitochondria, bacteria, and plants). Mitochondrial cyt c gains peroxidase activity12,13 under oxidative stress conditions leading to lipid peroxidation, downstream cell signaling, and cell apoptosis (programmed cell death). The conversion to a peroxidase is driven by a transition from a six-coordinate heme to a five-coordinate peroxidase-like system. This raises the question if enzymes with heme c, such as cyt c, readily accesses the compound 1 intermediate, despite structural differences in the way the heme is complexed to the protein.


image file: d5sc03378k-f2.tif
Fig. 2 The active-site structures of the resting ferric states of cyt cβ (A, 7S5O), bCcP (B, 1IQC) and HRP (C, 1H5A).8,11,14 The hemes are shown in similar orientations to highlight the roughly 90° rotation of the axial proximal His of the c-type hemes relative to the b-type heme of HRP. The highly conserved distal His170-Arg38 pair in HRP is replaced by an Arg46-Met79 pair in cyt cβ in comparable positions. Additionally, the heme of cyt cβ is distorted in a ruffled shape with a propionate hydrogen bonded to His152, which further differentiates its active site from that of peroxidases. Dashed lines indicate possible H-bond interactions. Figures to the right indicate the dihedral angle between the following two planes: the imidazole ring of the proximal His defined by Cε–Nε atoms relative to the plane defined by Fe–N (ring C) atoms of the of the porphyrin. The dihedral angle of cyt cβ listed corresponds to chain A of the crystal structure. Angles for chains B and C are 57.5° and 58.5° respectively.

Here, using stopped-flow absorbance (SF-Abs) and rapid freeze quench (RFQ) methods with purified cyt cβ, cβ including 57Fe-enriched preparations, we trap and characterize a green compound 1 intermediate from cyt cβ. The kinetic rate constant for the reaction of cyt cβ with H2O2 was found to be significantly slower than for other peroxidases, whereas the rate of decay of compound 1 was found to be comparable or slower than that of chloroperoxidase (CPO) and cyt P450. These rates suggest that the in vivo function of cyt cβ may not be to detoxify H2O2 as in peroxidases or catalases, but could use compound 1 as a potent oxidant catalyst for the conversion of cellular substrates.

Very recently, a compound 1 intermediate has been spectroscopically characterized from a bacterial di-heme peroxidase (bCcP) containing hemes c also from Nitrosomonas europaea.15 The heme structure from bCcP is shown in Fig. 2B for comparison.14 The compound 1 intermediates of cyt cβ and bCcP are the first known examples from heme c, although a ferryl intermediate is involved in cyt P460 cofactor maturation independent of compound 1.16 Here and in the bCcP paper, we determine the exchange coupling constants using Mössbauer spectroscopy. We show here that the values of J differ significantly between cyt cβ bCcP and HRP even though all three have an axial His to the heme and otherwise similar electronic characteristics. Furthermore, the variation in the coupling constant cannot be attributed to heme b versus heme c. The values of J for cyt cβ and bCcP are significantly positive and negative, respectively, implying that the sign change is not related to porphyrin radical delocalization onto the axial heme ligand.17–21 This suggests that the porphyrin structure and/or its microenvironment is a dominant determinant of the exchange coupling constant, rather than the axial heme ligand or heme type.

Results

Stopped-flow absorbance (SF-Abs)

The absorption spectrum of ferric cyt cβ displayed prominent absorbances at 397, 500, and 640 nm consistent with previous enzyme preparations (Fig. 3, initial red trace).9 The pre-steady state kinetics of the peroxidase activity were monitored with SF-Abs during reactions of ferric cyt cβ with either H2O2 or meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (mCPBA).
image file: d5sc03378k-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Stopped-flow absorption spectra of resting cβ (40 μM) reacting with excess H2O2 (800 μM) at 4 °C in the time regime of (A, red to green) 0 to 3 s and (B, green to blue) 5 to 50 s. The time interval between successive spectra is (A) 0.33 s and (B) 5 s. The insets are magnified by 5 and use the right-axis absorbance scale. The arrows indicate the increasing time changes and the denoted wavelengths are isosbestic points.

Rapid mixing of ferric cyt cβ with a 20-fold excess of H2O2 gave significant changes in both the Soret and Q-bands of the ferric enzyme. During the time span of 0 to 3 s (Fig. 3A, red to green traces), three isosbestic points were observed at the wavelengths marked on Fig. 3, indicating the formation of a new species (species 1) concomitantly with the loss of the ferric enzyme. The equal time interval spectra showed convergence to a species with red shifted absorbances at 404, 512, and 642 nm. The absorbances of species 1 (lower Soret intensity, red shift and growth of a 642 feature) are similar to previously characterized compound 1 type species (Table 1). In particular, the 642 nm feature are within the range (640 to 690 nm) of the green color attributed to the porphyrin π radical delocalized within the porphyrin ring of the compound 1 iron-oxo species.

Table 1 Compound 1 optical bands of applicable of compound 1 species
  λmax, nm, [ε, mM−1 cm−1] Ref.
Soret Q bands
Cyt cβ (H2O2) 404 512, 642 This work
Cyt cβ (mCPBA) 400 [93] 586 [5], 645 [15] This work
bCcP (H2O2) 409 658 15
HRP (H2O2) 402 [80] 580 [5], 640 [5] 22 and 23
HRP (mCPBA) 400 577, 622, 651 24
CPO (H2O2) 367 [49] 545 [7], 610 [6.5], 688 [11.7] 25
P450 (mCPBA) 370 [∼50] 610 [∼40], 690 [40] 26 and 27


Over a much longer time span of 5 to 50 s (Fig. 3B, green to blue traces), three new isosbestic points were observed at the wavelengths marked on the figure, indicating the formation of a new species (species 2) concomitantly with the loss of species 1. The equal time interval spectra showed convergence to a species with a further red shifted Soret band at 417 nm, Q-bands at 524 and 551 nm, and the loss of the 642 nm absorbance. The absorbances and slower kinetics of species 2 are similar to previously characterized compound 2 type species (Table 1).

Rapid mixing of ferric cyt cβ with a 20-fold excess of mCPBA gave similar changes in both the Soret and Q-bands, but on much faster time scales than reaction with H2O2. During the time span of 0 to 0.02 s (Fig. 4A, red to green traces), three isosbestic points were observed at the wavelengths marked on the figure, indicating the formation of a new species (species 1′) concomitantly with the loss of the ferric enzyme. The equal time interval spectra showed convergence to a species with red shifted Soret band at 400 nm and Q-bands at 586, and 645 nm. The absorbances of species 1′ are similar to species 1 and to previously characterized compound 1 type species (Table 1). Over the longer time span of 0.2 to 20 s (Fig. 4B, green to blue traces), three new isosbestic points were observed at the wavelengths marked on Fig. 4, indicating the formation of a new species (species 2′) concomitantly with the loss of species 1′. The equal time interval spectra showed convergence to a species with a further red shifted Soret band at 417 nm, Q-bands at 521 and 551 nm, and the loss of the 645 nm absorbance. The absorbances and slower kinetics of species 2′ were similar to species 2 and to previously characterized compound 2 type species.


image file: d5sc03378k-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Stopped-flow absorption spectra of resting cyt cβ (40 μM) reacting with excess mCPBA (800 μM) at 4 °C in the time regimes of (A, red to green) 0 to 0.02 s and (B, green to blue) 0.5 to 20 s. The time interval between successive spectra is (A) 0.002 s and (B) 2.2 s. The insets are magnified by 5 and use the right-axis absorbance scale. The arrows indicate increasing time changes and the denoted wavelengths are isosbestic points.

The RFQ-Mössbauer data (discussed below) of cyt cβ mixed with a 20-fold excess mCPBA gave a 75%, 25% ratio of compound 1 and ferric heme species, respectively. Assuming this same ratio for the early time domain of the SF-Abs data gave extinction coefficients for species 1′ of 93 mM−1 cm−1 at 400 nm and 15 mM−1 cm−1 at 650 nm. From these values and assuming the same extinction coefficients for 1 and 1′, the maximum temporal accumulation of species 1 during reaction with H2O2 was ∼30% of the overall protein concentration.

For the reaction with H2O2, single-valued decomposition (SVD) analysis of the spectra revealed that species 1 had a rate constant of formation of k1 = 2.0 × 103 M−1 s−1 and a decay constant of k2 = 0.06 s−1. The SVD eigenspectra agree with the experimental spectra of the species observed at 0, 3 and 50 s (Fig. S1) which correspond to the absorption spectra of the ferric, compound 1 and 2 species, respectively. Comparison of these kinetics with previously characterized compound 1 species reveal much slower formation rates than all other peroxidases and comparable or slower decay rates compared to CPO and cyt P450 (Table 2). Although the data in this paper was collected at 4 °C, the formation rate at 25 °C is estimated to be 8 × 103 M−1 s−1 assuming a doubling for every increase in 10 °C.28 This rate is approximately 2000 times slower than that of HRP.

Table 2 Pre-steady state kinetic parameters of cyt cβ compound 1
Enzyme (oxidant) k1 (M−1 s−1) k2 (s−1) Conditions Ref.
Cyt cβ (H2O2) 2.0 × 103 (±0.4) 0.06 (±0.02) pH 7.4, 4 °C This work
Cyt cβ (mCPBA) ≥8.0 × 105 (±1) 0.3 (±0.1) pH 7.4, 4 °C This work
HRP (H2O2) 1.4 × 107 0.0079 pH 7, 25 °C 30 and 31
HRP (mCPBA) 3.6 × 107 0.0064 pH 7, 25 °C 29
CcP (H2O2) 4.5 × 107 2600 pH 6.0, 25 °C 32–34
CPO (H2O2) 1.5 × 106 ND pH 2.8, 25 °C 35
CPO (peroxyacetic) 3.8 × 106 0.5 pH 4.7, 25 °C 36
P450 (mCPBA) 3.20 × 105 29.4 pH 7, 25 °C 26


For the reaction with mCPBA, the SVD analysis was somewhat hindered by the much higher formation rate. Indeed, comparison of the spectra of the fastest recorded time point (0.001 s) to the as-isolated enzyme reveal a decreased Soret intensity by ∼1/3 and the presence of the 650 nm feature. These findings imply that the initial formation of species 1′ is partially within the dead-time of the stopped-flow instrument (0.001 s). Nonetheless, the SVD analysis gave a lower limit for the formation rate of compound 1 to be k1 ≥ 8.0 × 105 M−1 s−1, which is 400 times faster than the formation of compound 1 from H2O2. Again, the eigenspectra agreed with the experimental spectra of the species observed at the intermediate and long-lived times. Comparison of this rate with previously studied compound 1 species produced with mCBPA (Table 2) reveal that the rate is comparable (or faster) at 25 °C (estimated at ≥3.2 × 106 M−1 s−1) to other heme enzymes. These formations rates for compound 1 species from mCPBA are near the diffusion limit. The decay kinetics of compound 1 with mCPBA (k2 = 0.3 s−1) was the same order of magnitude as that of H2O2 (0.06 s−1) and comparable or slower than that of CPO and cyt P450 (Table 2).

For reaction times of mCPBA greater than 60 s, compound 2 was observed to decay to another species. Optical data collected to 250 seconds (Fig. S2) show that compound 2 decays to an optical species that was approaching that of the as-isolated ferric enzyme. Previous reports found that HRP compound 2 reacts with excess mCPBA to produce inactive enzyme.29 It may be the case that cyt cβ compound 2 also exhibits similar behavior with mCPBA to produce an inactive species.

EPR and Mössbauer spectroscopy

EPR and Mössbauer samples of as-isolated cyt cβ showed spectra similar to those of previous preparations indicating that the protein was in the ferric state.9 The EPR spectra show two ferric heme species at the same ratio among numerous enzyme preparations. Fitting the spectrum to two heme species, constrained to equal amounts, gave good agreement with the experimental spectrum shown in Fig. 5A. The two species have E/D values of 0.014 and 0.026. The equal population of the two species suggests a possible dimer-like quaternary structure which was observed in the crystal structure of cyt cβ. A non-zero E/D value is presumably associated with an asymmetric interaction of the axial His π orbital with the iron dxz/dyz orbitals. Presumably, the dimeric structure causes different microenvironments of the hemes within each subunit, and hydrogen bonding differences at the axial His (or near the respective heme sites) result in two orientations of the His in solution. The Mössbauer spectrum of the ferric state is consistent with this speciation but is not as sensitive to the differences in species. The total heme concentration derived from these simulations also agreed with the concentration of the sample determined from optical absorption (ε400 = 91.5 mM−1 cm−1).
image file: d5sc03378k-f5.tif
Fig. 5 X-band (9.624 GHz) EPR spectra (red traces) of as-isolated cyt cβ (A) reacted with H2O2 (B–D) or mCPBA (green trace, E) at 4 °C and frozen (95 K) at the times listed. All recorded at 11 K and 0.2 mW microwave power. The simulation (black line) overlaid on the data of (A) is the sum of two species in equal amounts: E/D = 0.014 (blue dash), E/D = 0.026 (red dash).

RFQ samples of cyt cβ, mixed 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 with H2O2 at 4 °C were quenched in liquid ethane at 95 K. The various quench delay times gave the EPR spectra of Fig. 5B–D. The data show a progressive loss of both heme species. The dilution with H2O2 and packing of the quench powder lowers the protein concentration by approximately a factor of 4 in the sample tube. Accounting for this factor, the 20 ms sample (Fig. 5B) has nearly the same amount of ferric heme as the control sample. At 2 seconds, both heme species have decreased in concentration to 40% of the control sample. A radical species with a sharp signal at g = 2 is also present in the 2 second sample. The concentration of this radical species was determined with non-saturating microwave power at 100 K to be only 2% relative to the total heme concentration. This signal is assigned to a minority radical species, possibly from protein, which may be near the heme site but is not associated with a porphyrin radical state. Similar results were observed from two other series of RFQ preparations at times of 0.06, 1, 3, and 5 s.

The SF-Abs results of cyt cβ mixed with H2O2 indicated that the ferric species initially transformed into a new intermediate species, presumably compound 1, reaching a maximum amount of 30% of the protein concentration at 0.5 s. At later times this first intermediate transformed to a second species, assigned as compound 2. These results are compatible with the EPR data which showed the relatively slow loss of the ferric heme species. Compound 2 species are spin S = 1 with a large iron zero-field splitting, resulting in an EPR silent heme. Although the SF-Abs results indicated that a significant amount of compound 1 should be present in some of the EPR samples, none of spectra of the RFQ EPR samples showed a significant S = ½ signal that could be attributed to a compound 1 intermediate. The compound 1 intermediate of catalase exhibits an S = 3/2 signal near g = 4, but no such signal was observed in these EPR samples. At later times when the amount of compound 2 is significant, only a small amount (<5% relative to heme concentration) of a radical signal was observed in EPR spectra. The transformation of compound 1 to 2 requires an electron source which is presumed to be from the protein. The lack of a significant radical signal indicates that the ensuing protein radical is short-lived.

Our extensive work with H2O2 suggested that a compound 1 species should be present in moderate yield, and yet the S = ½ EPR signal of compound 1 was for some reason undetectable. Consequently, we pursued reactions using the alternative oxidant mCPBA and switched to Mössbauer spectroscopy with 57Fe enriched protein to determine which iron species were forming after loss of the precursor ferric heme species during reaction. The SF-Abs suggested that a compound 1 species could be stabilized in greater yield with mCPBA because the absorption at 645 nm in Fig. 4 was approximately twice as intense as that of Fig. 3. However, as will be shown below, mCPBA also did not give an observable compound 1 EPR signal.

57Fe ferric cyt cβ was mixed in equal amounts with a solution of 20 equivalents (relative to heme) of mCPBA at pH 7.4 and quenched in liquid ethane at a temperature of 95 K at reaction times of 0.01, 0.5, and 5 s. During this RFQ sample preparation, an equivalent EPR sample from the same quench powder was made of the 0.01 s time point. Upon preparation of the 0.01 s and 0.5 s samples, the reaction mixture quenched in the liquid ethane bath exhibited a striking change in color from red to green. To better understand the speciation within these samples, a separate long time point sample was prepared on the benchtop by mixing ferric cyt cβ with 20 equivalents of mCPBA followed by freezing in liquid ethane after approximately 15 seconds. The benchtop addition gave a sample with a higher protein concentration and better signal-to-noise. The results of this long-time sample are presented next, prior to the RFQ samples, to help identify reaction species in the mixture.

The Mössbauer spectra of the 15 s sample in variable magnetic fields are shown in Fig. 6. In zero magnetic field, the spectrum (Fig. 6D) exhibited a doublet and underlying broad features typical of paramagnetic species. The doublet has an isomer shift (δ) and quadrupole splitting (ΔEQ) indicative of an FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O species (Table 3, compound 2). In a weak magnetic field of 0.1 T, the paramagnetic species sharpen into a 6-line pattern characteristic of an S = 5/2 FeIII species. At higher fields of 3 and 7 T, an additional minor FeIII species is resolved. Fig. 6A–C shows simulations of the spectra fit to the same 3 species. The simulations are global least-squares fits of the data for the amounts and parameters given in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. The colored areas are the simulation components which sum to give the resulting black trace overlaid on the experimental data. The majority species (red, 57%) has electronic and hyperfine parameters typical of an S = 5/2 FeIII heme species. The first minor species (orange, 31%) has parameters indicative of an S = 1 FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O heme and is assigned to compound 2. The relatively low compound 2 yield is presumably caused by reduction of compound 2 at longer times from the excess equivalents of mCPBA as noted in the above SF-Abs results. The second minority species (blue, 12%) has parameters of δ = 0.59 mm s−1, ΔEQ = 1.1 mm s−1, D = 0.4 cm−1 and A = −21 T which are typical of non-heme S = 5/2 FeIII species bound adventitiously to the protein. This non-heme iron species was not observed in the RFQ samples below. The 15 s sample was from a different protein preparation than the RFQ samples, possibly some 57Fe salt from the growth media was not fully exchanged out during purification. Alternatively, the longer incubation time without a substrate can cause heme degradation as has been documented in the reactions of mCPBA with HRP or cyt P450.29,37,38


image file: d5sc03378k-f6.tif
Fig. 6 57Fe Mössbauer spectra (red vertical bars) of cyt cβ reacted with mCPBA at 4 °C and frozen (95 K) at 15 s, recorded at 4.2 K in the magnetic fields listed. The simulations (black traces) overlaid on the data are the sum of 3 species: S = 5/2 FeIII heme (red fill), compound 2 (orange fill), and S = 5/2 FeIII non-heme (blue fill) with amounts and parameters given in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 3 Relative absorption areas of the Mössbauer spectra produced during the reaction of cyt cβ with mCPBA
Time (s) % FeIII heme % Cmpd 1 % Cmpd 2
a A non-heme FeIII species (12%) was only observed in the 15 s sample.
0.01 25 65 < 10
0.5 18 49 33
5 30   70
15a 57 0 31


Table 4 A comparison of Mössbauer parameters for compound 1 and 2 states of heme enzymes
Species SFe SPor δ, mm s−1 ΔEQ, mm s−1 Ja, cm−1 D, cm−1 A, T Ref.
a Hex = JS1·S2.
FeIII 5/2   0.44 +1.53   13 −19, −19, −19 This work
Cmpd 1 1 1/2 0.08 +1.30 13 28 −25, −25, −2 This work
Cmpd 2 1 0 0.09 +1.59   28 −22, −22, −3 This work
bCcP 1 1 1/2 0.09 +1.21 −17 28 −23, −23, −5 15
bCcP 2 1 0 0.05 +1.67   28 −23, −23, −3 15
HRP 1 1 1/2 0.08 1.25 <±4 26 −19, −19, −6 6
HRP 2 1 0 0.03 1.61   22 −19, −19, −3 39
CPO 1 1 1/2 0.14 1.02 37 36 −20, −20, −1 40
P450 1 1 1/2 0.11 0.90 47 36 −20, −23, −3 5
Catalase 1 1 1/2 0.12 1.09 −5 17 −19, −19, −6 7


Moving to the RFQ samples, the Mössbauer spectra of the 10 ms sample in variable magnetic fields are shown in Fig. 7. In a weak field of 45 mT oriented parallel with the gamma radiation direction, the spectrum (Fig. 7E) exhibited broad features indicative of paramagnetic species. The outer-most lines near ±5 mm s−1 are from unreacted FeIII heme. Based on the data from Fig. 6, the inner doublet of Fig. 7E is too broad to be from the compound 2 species. Furthermore, Fig. 7D shows a spectrum in the same weak field but oriented perpendicular to the gamma ray direction. The spectra of species with an overall integer electronic spin are independent of the field orientation. The spectral change between Fig. 7D and E indicates that the majority species has half-integer spin and therefore not from compound 2. Fig. 7 shows simulations overlaid on the experimental data which are composed of the three species: compound 1, compound 2, and FeIII heme. The simulations are global least-squares fits of the data for the amounts and parameters given in Tables 3 and 4. There is no evidence of the adventitious non-heme FeIII species in the RFQ samples. These simulations include the largest possible amount of compound 2 compatible with the data (orange, 10%). While the SF-Abs kinetics suggests that no compound 2 is present at 10 ms, we cannot rule out a 10% minority amount based on the Mössbauer data alone and is included here for completeness. The fits to the data are slightly worse by excluding compound 2, in which case, the amount of compound 1 increases to 75%. The simulations unambiguously require that the majority features of the spectra are from a compound 1 species (green, 65%). Green compound 1 species in peroxidases are composed of an SFe = 1 FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O and a SPor = 1/2 porphyrin π-cation radical. These spins can exchange-couple either antiferromagnetically or ferromagnetically to give a total spin state of S = ½ or 3/2 low in energy, respectively. The exchange coupling value determined from the simulations is J = +13 cm−1 (Hex = JS1·S2) which falls within the moderate antiferromagnetic range between the J values of HRP and CPO (Table 4).


image file: d5sc03378k-f7.tif
Fig. 7 57Fe Mössbauer spectra (red vertical bars) of cyt cβ reacted with mCPBA at 4 °C and frozen (95 K) at 10 ms, recorded at 4.2 K and the magnetic fields listed. The simulations (black traces) overlaid on the data are the sum of 3 species: compound 1 (green fill), compound 2 (orange fill), and S = 5/2 FeIII heme (red fill) with amounts and parameters given in Tables 3 and 4. All spectra recorded with the magnetic field parallel to the gamma ray direction, except in D where it is perpendicular.

The EPR spectrum of the equivalent 10 ms RFQ sample is shown in Fig. 5E. The spectrum shows only one of the two FeIII heme species (E/D = 0.014) at an amount compatible with the Mössbauer data (25% of the heme concentration). The loss of the E/D = 0.026 heme species indicates a faster reactivity with mCPBA for this heme species. In contrast, both hemes reacted with H2O2 with similar but slower rates. The EPR spectrum also showed a minority radical species at g = 2. At 100 K under non-saturating microwave power, the signal quantified to 5% of the protein concentration. This minority signal may be from a nearby amino acid residue which was oxidized by compound 1. If true, the porphyrin would have been reduced to give a compound 2 heme species, which is compatible with a minor amount of compound 2 observed in the Mössbauer spectra of Fig. 7. Consequently, the majority of the heme in the 10 ms sample is EPR silent.

The Mössbauer spectra of the 0.5 s RFQ sample in variable magnetic fields are shown in Fig. 8A–C. In a field of 0.1 T oriented parallel to the gamma radiation direction (Fig. 8C), the spectrum exhibited a sharp doublet species which was not prominent in the 10 ms sample in the same magnetic field (Fig. 7C). The doublet is due to the presence of newly formed compound 2 species (orange, 33%). The outer-most lines at ±5 mm s−1 are again attributed to S = 5/2 FeIII heme (red, 18%). Fig. 8 show simulations overlaid on the experimental data which are composed of three species: compound 1, compound 2, and FeIII heme. The simulations are global least-squares fits of the data with amounts and parameters given in Tables 3 and 4. The SFe = 1 ferryl hemes of compounds 1 and 2 have similar electronic properties, however the porphyrin is reduced (SPor = 0) for compound 2 and thus the spectrum displays a doublet in a weak magnetic field because the lowest ms = 0 level is not magnetic (orange, Fig. 8C). Whereas for compound 1, the lowest states are paramagnetic and the species does not display a doublet (green, Fig. 8C).


image file: d5sc03378k-f8.tif
Fig. 8 57Fe Mössbauer spectra (A–C, red vertical bars) of cyt cβ reacted with mCPBA at 4 °C and frozen (95 K) at 0.5 s, recorded at 4.2 K and the magnetic fields listed. The simulations (black traces) overlaid on the data are the sum of 3 species: compound 1 (green fill), compound 2 (orange fill), and S = 5/2 FeIII heme (red fill) with amounts and parameters given in Tables 3 and 4. (D, green vertical bars) Cyt cβ reacted with mCPBA and frozen at 5 s, with a simulation showing compound 2 and S = 5/2 FeIII heme in amounts given in Table 3.

The Mössbauer spectra of the 5 s RFQ sample had low absorption owing to RFQ instrumentation leakage, and therefore acquisition of high-field data was not possible. Nevertheless, the spectrum in low field (Fig. 8D) showed a doublet with values of δ and ΔEQ matching that of compound 2. The simulation of the spectrum gave 70% compound 2 with the remainder compatible with 30% ferric heme.

Discussion

Cytochrome cyt cβ (cyt cβ) from the ammonia-oxidizing bacterium Nitrosomonas europaea contains heme c (Fig. 1 and 2A).8,9 The iron is 5-coordinate with a proximal axial His and an open distal coordination site which can bind various small ions and molecules such as cyanide and carbon monoxide. Owing to the similarity of tertiary structures, which are distinctly comprised of β-sheets, cyt cβ is a member of the widely distributed P460 superfamily of enzymes.10 A unique characteristic of the first characterized enzyme of the P460 superfamily, cyt P460, is an unusual cross-link connecting the 13′-meso carbon of the heme porphyrin to the nitrogen atom of a lysyl side chain of the protein backbone.41–43 This cross-link causes a red shift in the ferrous Soret band to 460 nm.16,44 However, cβ possesses a Met residue (Fig. 2A) in place of the crosslinking Lys residue of cyt P460, and lacks the red-shift of the Soret band due to the absence of the cross-link in the as isolated enzyme.9 The crystal structure of cyt cβ confirmed the absence of the cross-link and found that the spatial position of the methionyl side chain could virtually be superimposed with the lysyl side chain of cyt P460.8 The cross-link affects function: cyt P460 (with Lys/heme cross-link) oxidizes the substrate NH2OH and is inactivated by H2O2, whereas cyt cβ does not oxidize NH2OH but catalytically turns over H2O2. Nitrosomonas europaea expresses both cyt P460 and cyt cβ.9,45 In our previous work, cyt cβ exhibited guaiacol-dependent peroxidase activity (kcat = 20 s−1; KM = 2.6 mM). The addition of a slight excess of H2O2 to cyt cβ in the absence of substrate caused formation of a semistable FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O compound 2 species.

The SF-Abs data of cyt cβ reacting with H2O2 (Fig. 4) showed isosbestic points in the time range of 0 to 3 s with absorbances typical of compound 1 species of peroxidases (Table 1). The ferric heme reacts with H2O2 to produce compound 1 with a rate constant that is approximately 2000 times slower than that of HRP at the same reaction temperature. The compound 1 intermediate builds to a maximum of 30% of the total heme at ∼2 s. In the later time course of 3 to 100 s, a second set of isosbestic points are observed with absorbances typical of compound 2 species of peroxidases. This later time course is the transformation of compound 1 to 2 with a decay rate of compound 1 of k2 = 0.06 s−1. The lifetime of compound 1 of cyt cβ is shorter than peroxidases but longer than cyt P450 and CPO (Table 2). The slow reaction of H2O2 raises the possibility that the reaction with H2O2 could be part of a shunt mechanism, wherein the normal catalytic cycle involves O2, with H2O2 being an alternative oxidant in the formation of compound-1.46

The SF-Abs data showed much faster reaction with mCPBA in comparison to H2O2. The species detected had similar optical features indicating that the formation of intermediates compound 1 and 2 are independent of oxidant. The presence of compound 1 and 2 were confirmed from Mössbauer spectroscopy. The data also indicated that the transformation of the ferric heme into compound 1 was nearly within the dead time of the instrument, with an estimated rate of formation k1 > 106 M−1 s−1. In the later time course, similar isosbestic points were detected for the transformation of compound 1 to 2, with a decay rate of 0.3 s−1. A previous study of the reaction of HRP with mCPBA gave comparable kinetics (Table 2).29 In this previous study, mCPBA was found to cause reduction of compound 1 and 2 to FeIII heme on an approximate time scale of minutes. The Mössbauer spectrum of the reaction of cyt cβ with mCPBA after 15 s showed that a significant amount of the heme reverts back to the FeIII state which is consistent with the same reduction process, but on a shorter time scale.

The distal residues to the heme in HRP, like many other peroxidases, contain a critical His/Arg pair important for movement of a proton from H2O2 (Fig. 2C).1 In cyt cβ, Arg46 is in a similar location to the His170 of HRP and forms a hydrogen bond with a heme propionate group, but cyt cβ lacks the corresponding His residue of the His/Arg pair. This suggests that Arg46 is a critical catalytic residue in cyt cβ, and could be akin to the b-type heme DyP peroxidases where a conserved distal Arg serves to transfer the proton from the proximal to the distal oxygen of the peroxide during O–O excision.47,48 We find that the rate (k1) of compound 1 formation in cyt cβ is approximately 2000 times slower than typical peroxidases. However, the reaction with mCPBA at pH 7.4 gave a compound 1 formation rate more than 400 times faster than with H2O2, with a rate that is comparable to other peroxidases which approach the diffusion limit. The recovery of the fast formation rate is likely due to the lower pKa of mCPBA (7.6) relative to H2O2 (11.6). For the pH 7.4 reaction conditions of our study, the amount of deprotonated mCPBA would be ∼10 equivalents relative to heme and when bound to the iron could be charge stabilized by the cationic Arg side chain. Owing to the lower pKa of mCPBA relative to that of H2O2, the fraction of deprotonated acid is large such that there is no assistance needed for deprotonation. The O–O bond scission for this pathway can immediately proceed to form compound 1 and thus a much faster formation rate compared to H2O2. Elevated reaction rates with mCPBA over H2O2 have been observed previously in other heme enzymes and heme model complexes.3,25

Electronic properties of compound 1

In the short time span after reaction of cyt cβ with H2O2 or mCPBA, the green color and similarity of optical spectra with HRP indicate the presence of a porphyrin radical. The Mössbauer data for both enzymes indicate the presence of a SFe = 1 FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O center which is exchange coupled to a porphyrin SPor = 1/2 radical species. The magnetic properties of compound 1 heme species have a rich history in association with their electronic structures. The classic cases are the heme b enzymes eukaryotic cytochrome c peroxidase (CcP) and HRP where compound 1 is composed of spin SFe = 1 FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O and a spin S = 1/2 center which is located either on a protein radical (Trp in CcP) or as a porphyrin radical (HRP). In CcP, the weak exchange interaction between the heme iron and the Trp radical is mediated by an Asp residue, J ∼ 0.1 cm−1,49,50 which broadens the Trp radical signal but is readily detectable.51 For HRP, the exchange interaction complicated the detection of the EPR signal. Early in the history of HRP, compound 1 was known to be two oxidation equivalents above the ferric state and thus an overall half-integer spin. However, the identification of the HRP S = 1/2 EPR signal came sometime later because the exchange coupling constant is larger than that of CcP and causes significant broadening of the EPR signal.6,52,53 This complication in studies of HRP is pertinent to the present work. For cyt cβ, multiple RFQ samples gave no evidence of a broader HRP-like g = 2 EPR signal or any other signal attributable to compound 1, even though the SF-Abs data indicated that significant amounts of a compound 1 species were produced. The reason for the absence of an EPR signal attributable to the cβ compound 1 species is discussed next.

For an exchange interaction which is large compared to the zero-field splitting energy (|J| ≫ |D|), the SFe = 1 and SPor = 1/2 spins are coupled to give total spin states of S = 1/2 and 3/2 which are simple to model as isolated pairs of ms = ±1/2 states for EPR spectra. However, the iron of ferryl hemes has large zero-field splitting energies (+20 to +40 cm−1, Table 4). For JD, as is the case here, the S = 1/2 and 3/2 spin states are mixed causing the spin expectation at the iron and the experimentally observed g-tensor (geff) to be strongly dependent on the ratio J/D.40 For an antiferromagnetic exchange constant (J > 0, S = 1/2 lowest in energy), as J/D increases from zero, the geff,⊥ value passes from 2.0 (J/D = 0) through 0 (J/D = 0.4) to 1.6 (J/D = 1) and >2.0 (J/D > 1.3). For HRP with |J/D| ≈ 0.1, the values of the geff-tensor are all near 2 and the spectrum is broad owing to the spin interaction. For chloroperoxidase (CPO) with J/D ≈ 1, the S = 1/2 signal is nearly axial with geff,⊥ = 1.73. The variable field Mössbauer data for cβ allowed determination of both J and D to give J/D = 0.46 (Table 4). This value of J/D gives geff,⊥ = 0.28 and the predicted X-band EPR spectrum spans more than 3 T (Fig. S3). The spectral linewidth at this g-value is dominated by a distribution of values in either D or J. The simulation uses σD = 1 cm−1, which is small in comparison to the value of D = 28 cm−1. The geff,⊥ value is dependent on the intrinsic g-value of the ferryl iron, assumed to be 2.21. This was the intrinsic g-value experimentally determined for bCcP;15 very few of these values are known but variations in the value will not significantly change the results here. The combination of low transition probability and large overall linewidth results in a vanishingly small intensity for the signal. The feature at g = 2 in Fig. S3 is sharp but may be further broadened by hyperfine interactions or anisotropy in the porphyrin radical g-tensor. Nevertheless, the feature is overwhelmed by a minority radical signal from an unknown source. For the intensity of the EPR signal to be above this minority radical signal, or the noise in the spectrum at higher field, would require a 200-fold increase in enzyme concentration, which is why no EPR signal was detected from compound 1 of cyt cβ in our studies.

Green compound 1 species have an FeIV[double bond, length as m-dash]O center with an intermediate spin SFe = 1 state and an electronic configuration for the iron t2g orbitals of dxy2dxz1dyz1. The porphyrin π-orbital containing the unpaired spin (SPor = 1/2) is either a1u or a2u symmetry in idealized D4h symmetry. The two spins are exchange coupled but since the iron and porphyrin orbitals containing the unpaired electrons have different inversion symmetry the exchange-coupling constant is relatively small, |J| < 50 cm−1 (Hex = JS1·S2). The oxidation reactions that enzymes with heme b catalyze are dependent on the heme environment and the identity of the axial heme ligand, of which examples are: S-Cys (cyt P450), N-His (HRP), and O-Tyr (catalase). The variation of the value of J has also been observed to be correlated with the heme axial ligand. The value of J is antiferromagnetic (J > 0) for cyt P450, near zero for HRP, and ferromagnetic (J < 0) for catalase.5–7

The exchange coupling constant (J) for cyt cβ was found to be significantly different than that of all other compound 1 species (Table 4). Cyt cβ, bCcP and HRP exhibit significantly different exchange constants with other comparable electronic parameters, despite all three containing an axial N-donor to the heme. The isomer shift, quadrupole splitting, and D-value of compound 1 in cyt cβ bCcP and HRP are all similar, but differ significantly from those of CPO, P450 and catalase (Table 4), suggesting that these values are primarily influenced by the axial ligand to the heme iron. The orientation of the axial His is a distinct structural difference associated with heme b versus heme c. The CXXCH peptide chain for cyt cβ and bCcP causes a rotation of greater than 90° of the imidazole/His plane relative to that of HRP. The relevant dihedral angle is defined in Fig. 2 and for these structures is: 55° (cyt cβ), 41° (bCcP), 169° (HRP). However, this angle is approximately the same for cyt cβ and bCcP and yet the exchange constant is different by 30 cm−1 and with a sign change. The large change in the exchange constant between cyt cβ and bCcP, and relative to HRP, also does not indicate a specific dependence on c-type versus b-type hemes.

Owing to the different inversion symmetry of the iron and porphyrin orbitals with the unpaired electrons, the exchange constant is expected to be ferromagnetic (J < 0) in accordance with the Goodenough–Kanamori rules.54,55 Consequently, the antiferromagnetic exchange constant (J > 0) for cyt P450 and CPO has been suggested to require delocalization of the porphyrin radical onto the axial sulfur atom,17–21 which could also influence enzymatic function. However, ENDOR studies of CPO compound 1 found relatively little spin density on the axial sulfur.56 Like for cyt P450 and CPO, the exchange constant for cyt cβ is antiferromagnetic (J = +13 cm−1). The propensity to delocalize spin density onto the His axial heme ligand is no different for cyt cβ bCcP or HRP, indicating that an antiferromagnetic exchange constant does not require spin localization onto the axial ligand. The change in the value of J between bCcP and cyt cβ is 30 cm−1, which is similar to the change in the value of J between cyt cβ and CPO (Table 4). These observations suggest that structural properties other than the axial ligand or heme type are important in influencing the exchange constant. For example, hydrogen bonding to the heme propionates has been suggested to influence the electronic structure of the heme and the stabilization of a porphyrin radical.57,58 Also, a propionate in cyt cβ hydrogen bonds to the proximal His which may contribute to the observed heme distortion. Further computational work is ongoing to examine how changes in electronic structure induced by propionate hydrogen bonds and/or heme distortions may be responsible for the observed variation in the exchange constant.

Conclusion

A compound 1 intermediate has been detected from a second enzyme containing heme c indicating that the formation of compound 1 is not confined to cytochromes with heme b. Like HRP, cyt cβ and bCcP have an axial His ligand and many of the electronic properties of the compound 1 states of these enzymes are similar. However, the exchange coupling constant for compound 1 of the three enzymes differ significantly indicating that the exchange constant is not dominated or solely dependent on the axial ligand to the heme or heme type.

Nitrosomonas europaea expresses superoxide dismutase, which produces H2O2 from superoxide radicals likely generated during its metabolic use of ammonia and oxygen.9 To remove H2O2, Nitrosomonas europaea utilizes catalase and peroxidases (e.g. bCcP). Thus, the slow reaction rate of cyt cβ with H2O2 and the presence of catalase and other peroxidases suggests that the in vivo function of cyt cβ is not directed solely at the removal of H2O2, and possibly the reaction of the ferric enzyme with H2O2 is part of a shunt mechanism. Nevertheless, the presence of a long-lived compound 1 indicates an obligate catalytic intermediate in the function of the enzyme. The protein environment near the active site of cyt cβ protects against deleterious side reactions thereby facilitating reactions of compound 1 towards cellular substrates. The presence of cyt cβ in an ammonia-oxidizing bacterium suggests a function involving oxidation of nitrogen containing substrates. Work is ongoing to identify the in vivo substrate and the corresponding catalytic cycle.

Materials and methods

The ESI contains experimental methods, spectroscopic methods, SVD comparisons, and ESI figures.

Data availability

All study data are included in the article and/or ESI.

Author contributions

MH and JP wrote the manuscript. MH designed the experiments. JN and HK performed protein expression, purification, isotope incorporation; reviewed and edited manuscript. MH and JP performed the experiments and analyzed the data.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the NIH (GM141948 to M. P. H.) and the University of Washington SRCP and startup (to H. J. K.) for funding.

References

  1. T. L. Poulos, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 3919–3962 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. P. C. E. Moody and E. L. Raven, Acc. Chem. Res., 2018, 51, 427–435,  DOI:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00463.
  3. X. Huang and J. T. Groves, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 2491–2553,  DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00373.
  4. H. J. Kim, O. Khalimonchuk, P. M. Smith and D. R. Winge, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2012, 1823, 1604–1616,  DOI:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.04.008.
  5. J. Rittle and M. T. Green, Science, 2010, 330, 933–937,  DOI:10.1126/science.1193478.
  6. C. E. Schulz, P. W. Devaney, H. Winkler, P. G. Debrunner, N. Doan, R. Chiang, R. Rutter and L. P. Hager, FEBS Lett., 1979, 103, 102–105 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. O. Horner, J. M. Mouesca, P. L. Solari, M. Orio, J. L. Oddou, P. Bonville and H. M. Jouve, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem., 2007, 12, 509–525,  DOI:10.1007/s00775-006-0203-9.
  8. J. Abendroth, G. W. Buchko, F. N. Liew, J. N. Nguyen and H. J. Kim, Biochemistry, 2022, 61, 563–574,  DOI:10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00640.
  9. F. N. Liew, M. A. Brandys, S. Biswas, J. N. Nguyen, M. Rahmawati, M. Nevala, B. O. Elmore, M. P. Hendrich and H. J. Kim, Biochemistry, 2020, 59, 704–716,  DOI:10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00810.
  10. B. O. Elmore, D. J. Bergmann, M. G. Klotz and A. B. Hooper, FEBS Lett., 2007, 581, 911–916,  DOI:10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.068.
  11. G. I. Berglund, G. H. Carlsson, A. T. Smith, H. Szoke, A. Henriksen and J. Hajdu, Nature, 2002, 417, 463–468,  DOI:10.1038/417463a.
  12. V. Yin, G. S. Shaw and L. Konermann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 15701–15709,  DOI:10.1021/jacs.7b07106.
  13. A. Mandal, C. L. Hoop, M. DeLucia, R. Kodali, V. E. Kagan, J. Ahn and P. C. van der Wel, Biophys. J., 2015, 109, 1873–1884,  DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2015.09.016.
  14. H. Shimizu, D. J. Schuller, W. N. Lanzilotta, M. Sundaramoorthy, D. M. Arciero, A. B. Hooper and T. L. Poulos, Biochemistry, 2001, 40, 13483–13490 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. P. Hewitt, M. P. Hendrich and S. J. Elliott, Chem. Sci., 2025, 16, 6070–6078,  10.1039/d4sc07339h.
  16. M. M. Bollmeyer, R. E. Coleman, S. H. Majer, S. D. Ferrao and K. M. Lancaster, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 14404–14416 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. R. Weiss, D. Mandon, T. Wolter, A. X. Trautwein, M. Muther, E. Bill, A. Gold, K. Jayaraj and J. Terner, JBIC, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem., 1996, 1, 377–383,  DOI:10.1007/s007750050069.
  18. M. Shoji, H. Isobe, T. Saito, Y. Kitagawa, S. Yamanaka, T. Kawakami, M. Okumura and K. Yamaguchi, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 2008, 108, 2950–2965,  DOI:10.1002/qua.21868.
  19. J. C. Schoneboom, F. Neese and W. Thiel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 5840–5853,  DOI:10.1021/ja0424732.
  20. M. T. Green, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 9495–9499,  DOI:10.1021/ja994377k.
  21. M. T. Green, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 9218–9219,  DOI:10.1021/Ja010105h.
  22. W. E. Blumberg, J. Peisach, B. A. Wittenberg and J. B. Wittenberg, J. Biol. Chem., 1968, 243, 1854–1862 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. R. Rutter, M. Valentine, M. P. Hendrich, L. P. Hager and P. G. Debrunner, Biochemistry, 1983, 22, 4769–4774 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. D. M. Davies, P. Jones and D. Mantle, Biochem. J., 1976, 157, 247–253,  DOI:10.1042/bj1570247.
  25. M. M. Palcic, R. Rutter, T. Araiso, L. P. Hager and H. B. Dunford, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1980, 94, 1123–1127,  DOI:10.1016/0006-291x(80)90535-5.
  26. D. G. Kellner, S.-C. Hung, K. E. Weiss and S. G. Sligar, J. Biol. Chem., 2002, 277, 9641–9644,  DOI:10.1074/jbc.C100745200.
  27. J. Rittle, J. M. Younker and M. T. Green, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 3610–3617 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. J. H. Espenson, Chemical Kinetics and Reaction Mechanisms, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 2nd edn, 1995 Search PubMed.
  29. J. N. Rodriguez-Lopez, J. Hernández-Ruiz, F. Garcia-Cánovas, R. N. Thorneley, M. Acosta and M. B. Arnao, J. Biol. Chem., 1997, 272, 5469–5476,  DOI:10.1074/jbc.272.9.5469.
  30. A. T. Smith, S. A. Sanders, R. N. Thorneley, J. F. Burke and R. R. Bray, Eur. J. Biochem., 1992, 207, 507–519 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. M. B. Arnao, M. Acosta, J. A. del Rio, R. Varon and F. Garcia-Canovas, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1990, 1041, 43–47 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. S. Loo and J. E. Erman, Biochemistry, 1975, 14, 3467–3470,  DOI:10.1021/bi00686a027.
  33. T. Yonetani and G. S. Ray, J. Biol. Chem., 1965, 240, 4503,  DOI:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)97090-0.
  34. M. Chance, L. Powers, T. Poulos and B. Chance, Biochemistry, 1986, 25, 1266–1270 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. J. A. Thomas, D. R. Morris and L. P. Hager, J. Biol. Chem., 1970, 245, 3135–3142,  DOI:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)63033-9.
  36. T. Araiso, R. Rutter, M. M. Palcic, L. P. Hager and H. B. Dunford, Can. J. Biochem., 1981, 59, 233–236 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. A. N. Hiner, J. Hernandez-Ruiz, F. Garcia-Canovas, A. T. Smith, M. B. Arnao and M. Acosta, Eur. J. Biochem., 1995, 234, 506–512,  DOI:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.506_b.x.
  38. T. Spolitak, J. H. Dawson and D. P. Ballou, J. Biol. Chem., 2005, 280, 20300–20309,  DOI:10.1074/jbc.M501761200.
  39. C. Schulz, R. Chiang and P. G. Debrunner, J. Phys., 1979, 40, 534–536 Search PubMed.
  40. R. Rutter, L. P. Hager, H. Dhonau, M. Hendrich, M. Valentine and P. Debrunner, Biochemistry, 1984, 23, 6809–6816 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. D. J. Bergmann and A. B. Hooper, FEBS Lett., 1994, 353, 324–326 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  42. D. M. Arciero and A. B. Hooper, FEBS Lett., 1997, 410, 457–460 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. A. R. Pearson, B. O. Elmore, C. Yang, J. D. Ferrara, A. B. Hooper and C. M. Wilmot, Biochemistry, 2007, 46, 8340–8349 CrossRef CAS.
  44. D. J. Bergmann and A. B. Hooper, Eur. J. Biochem., 2003, 270, 1935–1941 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  45. J. K. Zorz, J. A. Kozlowski, L. Y. Stein, M. Strous and M. Kleiner, Front. Microbiol., 2018, 9, 938 CrossRef PubMed.
  46. I. G. Denisov, T. M. Makris, S. G. Sligar and I. Schlichting, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 2253–2278,  DOI:10.1021/cr0307143.
  47. R. Singh, J. C. Grigg, Z. Armstrong, M. E. P. Murphy and L. D. Eltis, J. Biol. Chem., 2012, 287, 10623–10630,  DOI:10.1074/jbc.M111.332171.
  48. J. N. Roberts, R. Singh, J. C. Grigg, M. E. P. Murphy, T. D. H. Bugg and L. D. Eltis, Biochemistry, 2011, 50, 5108–5119 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  49. A. L. P. Houseman, P. E. Doan, D. B. Goodwin and B. M. Hoffman, Biochemistry, 1993, 32, 4430–4443 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  50. J. E. Huyett, P. E. Doan, R. Gurbiel, A. L. P. Houseman, M. Sivaraja, D. B. Goodin and B. M. Hoffman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 9033–9041,  DOI:10.1021/ja00140a021.
  51. T. Yonetani, H. Yamamoto, J. E. Erman, J. S. Leigh Jr and G. H. Reed, J. Biol. Chem., 1972, 247, 2447–2455 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  52. J. E. Roberts, B. M. Hoffman, R. Rutter and L. P. Hager, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 7654–7656 CrossRef CAS.
  53. J. E. Roberts, B. M. Hoffman, R. Rutter and L. P. Hager, J. Biol. Chem., 1981, 256, 2118–2121 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  54. J. B. Goodenough, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1958, 6, 287–297,  DOI:10.1016/0022-3697(58)90107-0.
  55. J. Kanamori, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1959, 10, 87–98,  DOI:10.1016/0022-3697(59)90061-7.
  56. S. H. Kim, R. Perera, L. P. Hager, J. H. Dawson and B. M. Hoffman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 5598–5599,  DOI:10.1021/ja060776l.
  57. V. Guallar, M.-H. Baik, S. J. Lippard and R. A. Friesner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2003, 100, 6998–7002 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  58. T. P. Barrows and T. L. Poulos, Biochemistry, 2005, 44, 14062–14068 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc03378k
Present address: Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.