Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Bright and water-dispersible membrane probes enable visualization of cellular morphologies and dynamics in light-scattering tissues of living mice

Takumi Uemura a, Ryosuke Kawakami b, Hitomi Seki a, Satoshi Yoshida c, Masamoto Murakami de, Takeshi Imamura b, Hadano Shingo a, Shigeru Watanabe a and Yosuke Niko *af
aResearch and Education Faculty, Multidisciplinary Science Cluster, Interdisciplinary Science Unit, Kochi University, 2-5-1 Akebono-cho, Kochi-shi, Kochi 780-8520, Japan. E-mail: y.niko@kochi-u.ac.jp
bDepartment of Molecular Medicine for Pathogenesism, Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan
cDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan
dDepartment of Anatomy, Histochemistry and Cell Biology, Miyazaki University, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan
eDepartment of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1-Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan
fCenter for Photodynamic Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nankoku, Kochi 783-8505, Japan

Received 26th April 2025 , Accepted 20th June 2025

First published on 20th June 2025


Abstract

Fluorescent plasma membrane probes are indispensable tools for biological studies, enabling the visualization of the fine structure and dynamics of plasma membranes, and, by extension, the overall morphology of living cells. However, their use has been mostly limited to imaging cultured cells or fixed tissue slices. Indeed, few probes have been optimized for visualizing cellular morphologies in intact tissues or organs. Here, we report a new bright squaraine-based membrane probe, dSQ12AQ, which incorporates two anionic anchor groups (sulfonate and long alkyl chain) to ensure high water dispersibility without precipitation—even at concentrations exceeding 10 mg mL−1. This highly concentrated probe solution was intravenously administered to living mice without the need for dimethyl solfoxide or other solubilizing agents. Combined with two-photon microscopy, dSQ12AQ enabled clear visualization of whole-cell morphology in vivo, allowing dynamic imaging of flowing, rolling, and/or remaining stationary blood cells in the bone marrow vasculature. Moreover, dSQ12AQ extravasated from blood vessels, enabling further staining and visualization of cells in the perivascular bone marrow region. This extravasation was also observed in the hind paw skin, enabling clear visualization of keratinocytes in the epidermis, as well as fibroblasts and eccrine sweat duct cells in the dermis. These results highlight the potential of dSQ12AQ as a valuable tool for in vivo studies of various cellular processes and for investigation of refractory or poorly understood diseases and their treatments.


Introduction

Cell membranes not only separate the intracellular and extracellular environments but also act as a scaffold for fundamental cellular functions, such as signal transduction, membrane transport, and immune responses.1–6 Many complex cellular processes, including apoptosis7 and metastasis,8 involve dynamic changes in cellular morphology, often accompanied or driven by alterations in membrane dynamics. These changes reflect, or even influence, the functional states of cells. Accordingly, techniques for visualizing cell membranes—and thus cellular morphology—are not only critical for detecting and understanding such dynamic behaviors but also provide valuable insights into cellular functions such as the differentiation potential of stem cells, metastatic capacity and drug resistance of cancer cells, and activation status of immune cells.9

Over the past two decades, various fluorescent probes have been developed to visualize cell membranes in living cells, offering high spatiotemporal resolution and multicolor capability.10,11 Among them, the MemBright (MB)12 and dSQ12S,13 probes developed by Collot et al. have gained prominence in biophysics because of their high selectivity for plasma membranes, high one- and two-photon excitation brightness, and photostability (Fig. 1a). These probes, composed of a fluorophore and two anchor groups comprising a long alkyl chain and a zwitterionic moiety, function as fluorogenic amphiphilic molecules, forming non-emissive aggregates (OFF state) in buffer. In the presence of lipid membranes, they bind to the membranes and enter the ON state, exhibiting fluorogenic behavior that is well-suited for wash-free imaging (Fig. 1b). However, their application has been mostly limited to cultured cells rather than live animal tissues and organs, such as those of mice, where wash-free usability is particularly desirable. This limited use is likely related to their poor water dispersibility, as they tend to precipitate in aqueous solutions. As a result, administering highly concentrated probe solutions into live biological environments such as blood vessels can be lethal. In contrast, in vivo fluorescence imaging, particularly when targeting light-scattering tissues, typically requires high probe concentrations to achieve sufficient signal intensity.14,15 Indeed, probes capable of visualizing the morphology of cell membranes in light-scattering tissues of living animals are expected to become important research tools across a wide range of biological fields, including biomedicine. For instance, among various in vivo models and live-cell systems, the skin represents a particularly informative platform, as it exhibits disease-specific morphologies in many refractory skin diseases, such as malignant tumors16–18 and inflammatory disorders.19–23 Visualizing cell membranes in the skin can therefore aid in detecting such diseases, reveal their pathophysiology, and facilitate the development of effective treatments.


image file: d5sc03047a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) Chemical structures of MB, dSQ12S, and newly developed dSQ12AQ (this study) and (b) their OFF–ON fluorescent behavior in the absence and presence of a lipid membrane. (c) Application of dSQ12AQ for in vivo 2PM imaging of cell membranes in living tissues/organs. IV, intravenous; 2PM, two-photon microscopy.

Here, we developed a squaraine-based fluorescent probe for in vivo cell membrane imaging, named dSQ12AQ (Fig. 1a). This probe was rationally redesigned to incorporate two anionic anchor groups, enhancing its water dispersibility compared to the dSQ12S and MB probes. A highly concentrated, precipitate-free aqueous solution of dSQ12AQ was successfully prepared and intravenously administered into live mice (Fig. 1c). Using two-photon microscopy (2PM), dSQ12AQ enabled clear visualization of cell morphology in vivo by selectively staining cell membranes in light-scattering tissues, including those of the skin, bone marrow, and blood vessels.

Results and discussion

The synthesis and characterization of dSQ12AQ are described in the ESI (Scheme S1 and Fig. S1–S5). Briefly, a squaraine dye with two terminal alkynes on the indolenine moieties was synthesized using previously reported procedures.13 This molecule was coupled with two anionic anchors bearing an azide group via copper(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne Huisgen cycloaddition to generate dSQ12AQ. This probe was characterized via proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry. As expected, dSQ12AQ remained well-dispersed at a concentration of 1.0 mg mL−1 (ca. 0.73 mM) in 20 mM phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.2) without the aid of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), whereas the model compound dSQ12S rapidly precipitated (see photos shown in Fig. 1a). Remarkably, dSQ12AQ did not precipitate even at a high concentration of 10 mg mL−1, which is advantageous for intravenous administration of a large amount of probe.

To confirm whether dSQ12AQ forms aggregates in buffer as illustrated in Fig. 1b, the dependence of its absorption spectra in PB on dye concentration was studied (Fig. S7). dSQ12AQ exhibited a drastic change in spectral shape between 0.1 and 0.5 μM, and its critical aggregation concentration (CAC) was determined to be around 0.42 μM (Fig. S8). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis also confirmed the formation of nanosized aggregates of dSQ12AQ (Fig. S9). Interestingly, dSQ12S did not display a clear CMC at least 0.1–0.5 μM. Considering that the fluorescence intensity of dSQ12S at 0.1 μM is lower than that of dSQ12AQ (Fig. S7), it is likely that dSQ12S rapidly forms aggregates below 0.1 μM. This difference in CMC between dSQ12AQ and dSQ12S is consistent with their difference in water dispersibility.

Next, the absorption and fluorescence of dSQ12AQ in the absence and presence of lipid membranes were studied (Fig. 2a and b). Detailed spectroscopic data, including molar extinction coefficients and fluorescence quantum yields, are summarized in Fig. S10 and Table S1 of the ESI. Large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) with various lipid compositions were used as model membranes.24 In the absence of LUVs, dSQ12AQ exhibited a maximum absorption at approximately 590 nm, indicative of the formation of non-emissive H-aggregation.25,26 Consistently, no pronounced fluorescence was observed. In contrast, in the presence of LUVs composed of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), which forms a loosely-packed liquid-disordered phase with high fluidity,24,27dSQ12AQ showed stronger absorption and fluorescence at approximately 642 and 652 nm, respectively, and the spectral shape observed here was almost identical to that in DMSO, where dSQ12AQ exists in a molecularly dispersed state. This result indicates that dSQ12AQ binds to lipid membranes while dissociating its aggregates. Similar spectral behavior was observed with LUVs composed of sphingomyelin and cholesterol (SM/Chol), which form a tightly packed liquid-order phase with lower fluidity.24,27 These results suggest that dSQ12AQ neither precipitated readily nor fully dissolved in buffer, yet maintained fluorogenic behavior comparable to that of dSQ12S.13 In fact, it exhibits slightly higher fluorescence quantum yields in LUVs than dSQ12S, likely due to the suppression of intermolecular aggregation on membranes, facilitated by its anionic moieties (Table S1). The combination of enhanced water-dispersibility and preserved fluorogenic response makes dSQ12AQ particularly suitable for in vivo applications, which typically require high probe concentration and are often incompatible with washing steps.14,15


image file: d5sc03047a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) Absorption and (b) fluorescence spectra of dSQ12AQ in DMSO, PB, and in the presence of LUVs. The probe and lipid concentrations were 0.4 and 80 μM, respectively (lipid only for LUVs). (c) Laser scanning confocal microscopy images of unwashed PC-3 cells co-stained with 0.2 μM MB488 and dSQ12A. (Left) Image recorded with the MemGlow 488 (blue) channel (Ex: 473 nm, Em: 490–525 nm), middle: image recorded with the dSQ12AQ (red) channel (Ex: 635 nm, Em: 655–755 nm), and (Right) merge of the two channels. Scale bar is 20 μm. Chol, cholesterol; DOPC, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; LUV, large unilamellar vesicle; SM, sphingomyelin.

To confirm that dSQ12AQ works as a membrane probe, we performed confocal microscopy imaging of cultured cells (human prostate cancer cell line, PC-3) co-stained with a commercially available plasma membrane probe (MemGlow 488)11 and dSQ12AQ. Merged images of the blue (MemGlow 488) and red (dSQ12AQ) channels showed strong colocalization, with a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.92 (Fig. 2c), indicating that dSQ12AQ can function as a membrane probe. Prior to in vivo imaging, the utility of dSQ12AQ for imaging cell membranes in living cultured cells was further explored using advanced confocal microscopy (Fig. S11). Even at a low concentration of 10 nM, dSQ12AQ clearly visualized cell membranes with a sufficiently high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), achieving values of 142 ± 38 (mean ± SD), comparable to those obtained with dSQ12S (212 ± 41). Interestingly, despite the higher fluorescence quantum yields of dSQ12AQ in model membranes, its observed SNR was somewhat lower than dSQ12S. This is likely due to the greater hydrophobic character of dSQ12S, which may promote more efficient membrane binding (increasing signal) while facilitating self-quenching of unbound probe in the extracellular space (reducing background). Thus, while dSQ12S may offer slightly better performance for in vitro imaging, dSQ12AQ still demonstrates sufficient utility for practical use.

Next, dSQ12AQ was used for in vivo 2PM imaging (Fig. 3). A highly concentrated dSQ12AQ buffer solution (100 μL, 10 mg mL−1) was intravenously administered to a live mouse, and 2PM imaging was performed 5 h post-injection using an 1100 nm excitation laser. Squaraine dyes can be excited at such long wavelengths, which reduces excitation light scattering and absorption in biological tissues, thereby enhancing the imaging depth.15,28–30 Leveraging this property, we first conducted 2PM imaging of the bone marrow of a mouse skull, without the need for surgical procedures such as bone thinning. Bone marrow is a highly scattering tissue and is challenging target invivo imaging, especially when aiming for high spatiotemporal resolution with minimal invasiveness.31 Remarkably, our imaging revealed a net-like structure within the bone marrow vasculature (Fig. 3a, b and Movie S1). These structures were interpreted as individual blood cells, whose plasma membranes were clearly highlighted by dSQ12AQ staining. Although dSQ12AQ appeared to localize slightly to intracellular membranes, likely due to interactions with blood proteins that promote internalization of membrane probes, it still effectively delineated overall cell morphologies. This observation contrasted markedly with conventional blood vasculature imaging using standard fluorescent probes, which typically only delineate the vascular lumen.14 Moreover, time-lapse imaging revealed that most of the observed smaller cells flowed rapidly, whereas some larger cells moved slowly along the vessels or even remained stationary (red and blue arrows in Fig. 2b and Movie S2). The former can be characterized as red blood cells, whereas the latter are likely white blood cells. Interestingly, we did not find dSQ12AQ in the urine of mice, suggesting that most probes bind to blood cell membranes and thus avoid renal excretion, which typically occurs for small molecules. Nevertheless, we observed the cells in perivascular bone marrow, indicating that the probe extravasated from the blood vessels—a phenomenon also typically associated with small molecules (Fig. 3c). This is probably due to the moderate affinity of dSQ12AQ for lipid membranes, which allows it to associate transiently with both blood cells and vascular endothelial cells. Such membrane interaction may facilitate its extravasation into surrounding tissues. These findings demonstrate that the probe is a powerful tool for labeling cell membranes in living tissues and organs, enabling visualization of both cellular morphology and dynamics. Accordingly, it holds significant value for investigating diverse cellular behaviors, including rolling, adhesion, migration, intravasation, and extravasation.


image file: d5sc03047a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) 2PM images of the skull bone marrow in a living mouse, acquired 5 h post intravenous injection of dSQ12AQ (100 μL, 10 mg mL−1). (b) Image of the bone marrow vasculature. Red and blue arrows indicate slowly moving and stationary cells, respectively. (c) Image of the perivascular region in bone marrow. Ex: 1100 nm, Em: 500–550 nm (cyan, second-harmonic generation (SHG)), 560–685 nm (green, fluorescence). Scale bars in (a), (b), and (c) are 100, 50, and 20 μm, respectively. 2PM, two-photon microscopy.

Next, the skin tissues of live mice were imaged using 2PM. Hind paw skin is considered an important model for human skin due to its relatively thick layers and the presence of eccrine sweat glands.32 Nevertheless, conventional 2PM imaging of hind paw skin has been limited, likely due to the lack of a suitable probe capable of staining and imaging such thick tissue.33 Based on the favorable results in bone marrow, namely, the extravasation from blood vessels and high brightness under 1100 nm excitation, dSQ12AQ shows strong potential as a probe for skin tissue imaging. Three-dimensional 2PM imaging of skin tissues from the epidermis to the dermis was performed 5 h post-intravenous injection (Fig. 4 and Movie S3). Remarkably, cells in both the epidermal and dermal region were clearly visualized. This result indicates that dSQ12AQ extravasated from the dermal vasculature, stained cell membranes in the dermis, and subsequently diffused into the epidermis across the basal membrane (Fig. 4a). In the epidermal region (Fig. 4b), dSQ12AQ primarily stained the cell membranes of keratinocytes, making it a potentially valuable tool for detecting skin diseases characterized by distinct cellular morphologies such as malignant tumors including Extramammary Paget's disease16 and basal cell carcinoma,17,18 as well as inflammatory disorders such as psoriasis vulgaris20 and palmoplantar pustulosis.21–23 The fibroblast morphology was imaged in the dermal regions, which may be beneficial for studying their role in tissue repair (Fig. 4c). Moreover, dSQ12AQ visualized the eccrine sweat gland duct cells morphology (Fig. 4d). This feature of dSQ12AQ is useful for evaluating the pathophysiology of acquired idiopathic generalized anhidrosis,34,35 which significantly diminishes patients' quality of life but remains poorly understood because methods for observing cells in living tissues are lacking.


image file: d5sc03047a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 2PM images of the skin tissue of a living mouse, acquired 5 h post-intravenous injection of dSQ12AQ (100 μL, 10 mg mL−1). (a) Overview of the tissue structure covering from the epidermis to the dermis. Images of (b) keratinocytes and (c) fibroblasts in the epidermis and dermis region, respectively. (d) Image of the eccrine sweat glands in the dermis region. Ex: 1100 nm, Em: 500–550 nm (cyan, SHG), 560–685 nm (green, fluorescence). 2PM, two-photon microscopy. SHG, second-harmonic generation.

Finally, all aforementioned in vivo 2PM imaging is challenging with the commercial MB series and dSQ12S, as these probes rapidly precipitate in buffer (see the Note in Section 2-4 of the ESI). The difference between dSQ12S and dSQ12AQ lies in the anchor group, which is zwitterionic or anionic. To validate the utility of the anionic anchor, we synthesized Cy5-12AQ, a water-dispersible analog of MemGlow 640 (member of the MB family),25 in which two anionic anchor groups were used rather than zwitterionic anchor groups (see Scheme S1 and Fig. S6). We found that Cy5-12AQ could also be intravenously administered to mice, enabling its extravasation from blood vessels and subsequent visualization of cell morphologies and dynamics in the hind paw skin (Fig. S12). These results indicate that introducing anionic anchor groups enhances the water dispersibility of the fluorophore, even if the fluorophore itself is cationic (MB series) or zwitterionic (squaraine) and provides plasma membrane-selectivity and fluorogenic function to the fluorophores. This is an important finding of this work, as plasma membrane probes bearing anionic anchors already exist but their potential for in vivo imaging has not been explored.36,37 Very recently, a new series of MB probes developed by Danylchuk, Klymchenko, and colleagues has emerged as a promising candidate for in vivo imaging applications due to its incorporation of distinct anionic anchors.38 However, the effects of fluorophore charges—namely, carbocyanine in the MB series and squaraine in the SQ series—as well as the structure of the anionic anchor on staining behavior and localization remain unclear. Although we have qualitatively observed differences between dSQ12AQ and Cy5-12AQ, particularly in epidermal staining patterns, a comprehensive understanding is lacking. We are therefore currently investigating the detailed staining characteristics of dSQ12AQ across various tissues and organs.

Conclusion

We developed a squaraine-based cell membrane probe, dSQ12AQ, which exhibits exceptionally high water dispersibility, due to the incorporation of two anionic anchors. This probe remained stably dispersed even at 10 mg mL−1 in buffer without precipitation, enabling intravenous administration of the probe at high concentrations to live mice. As the squaraine dye is efficiently excited by a tissue-penetrative 1100 nm laser, high-quality 2PM imaging was achieved in the bone marrow and hind paw skin tissue of live mice. 2PM imaging revealed that dSQ12AQ primary stained the plasma membranes of blood cells, allowing for visualization of their morphologies and dynamics. Furthermore, the probe extravasated from the blood vessels, diffused, and stained bone marrow cells. Similar extravasation and staining behavior were observed in the hind paw skin tissue, where the morphology and dynamics of keratinocytes in the epidermis, fibroblasts, and cells in the duct portion of the eccrine sweat glands were visualized. These features of dSQ12AQ were also observed in carbocyanine dye with two anionic anchors, highlighting the general importance of anchor design for achieving high water dispersibility, membrane targeting, and fluorogenic performance. The new probes presented here will be beneficial for studying various cellular processes and for examining the pathophysiology of refractory and/or poorly understood diseases including malignant tumors, inflammatory disorders, and acquired idiopathic generalized anhidrosis.

Data availability

Experimental data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author contributions

TU conducted molecular synthesis, LUV preparation, and spectroscopic measurements and wrote the manuscript. RK conducted in vivo 2PM imaging and image analysis. HS conducted in vitro imaging and image analysis. SY and MM contributed to characterization of the skin tissue structure and writing the manuscript. TI supported in vivo 2PM imaging, data analysis, and review of the manuscript. SH and SW helped synthesize the molecules, performed spectroscopic analysis, and reviewed the manuscript. YN handled conceptualization, writing, and editing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

YN was supported by JST ACT-X (JPMJAX211D), the Nakatani Foundation, the Takeda Science Foundation, and JSPS KAKENHI (23H01936). RK was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (22K06960). TI was supported by the Naito Foundation, the Uehara Memorial Foundation, the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund (23-255005), and JSPS KAKENHI (JP21H03056). This work was also supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16H06280 (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas—Platforms for Advanced Technologies and Research Resources: “Advanced Bioimaging Support”). The authors are grateful to Ms Tsugumi Shiokawa, Division of Instrumental Analysis, Okayama University, for assistance with mass spectrometric analysis. They also thank Mr Katsuki Osaki and Mr Shota Tsurui for their support in performing confocal microscopy imaging. All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments of Ehime University (#05RE2-16), and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the approved guidelines.

References

  1. K. Simons and E. Ikonen, Nature, 1997, 387, 569–572 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. K. Simons and D. Toomre, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2000, 1, 31–39 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. D. A. Brown and E. London, J. Biol. Chem., 2000, 275, 17221–17224 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. K. Jacobson, O. G. Mouritsen and R. G. W. Anderson, Nat. Cell Biol., 2007, 9, 7–14 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. D. Lingwood and K. Simons, Science, 2010, 327, 46–50 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. E. Sezgin, I. Levental, S. Mayor and C. Eggeling, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2017, 18, 361–374 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. Y. Zhang, X. Chen, C. Gueydan and J. Han, Cell Res., 2018, 28, 9–21 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. K. Aoki, S. Harada, K. Kawaji, K. Matsuzawa, S. Uchida and J. Ikenouchi, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 4052 CrossRef PubMed.
  9. A. Prasad and E. Alizadeh, Trends Biotechnol., 2019, 37, 347–357 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. A. S. Klymchenko and R. Kreder, Chem. Biol., 2014, 21, 97–113 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. A. S. Klymchenko, Acc. Chem. Res., 2023, 56, 1–12 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. M. Collot, P. Ashokkumar, H. Anton, E. Boutant, O. Faklaris, T. Galli, Y. Mély, L. Danglot and A. S. Klymchenko, Cell Chem. Biol., 2019, 26, 600–614 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. M. Collot, R. Kreder, A. L. Tatarets, L. D. Patsenker, Y. Mély and A. S. Klymchenko, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 17136–17139 RSC.
  14. M. Takezaki, R. Kawakami, S. Onishi, Y. Suzuki, J. Kawamata, T. Imamura, S. Hadano, S. Watanabe and Y. Niko, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2010698 CrossRef CAS.
  15. H. Matsuura, R. Kawakami, M. Isoe, M. Hoshihara, Y. Minami, K. Yatsuzuka, T. Tsuda, M. Murakami, Y. Suzuki, J. Kawamata, T. Imamura, S. Hadano, S. Watanabe and Y. Niko, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2022, 14, 40481–40490 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. M. Murakami, R. Kawakami, Y. Niko, T. Tsuda and T. Imamura, Exp. Dermatol., 2023, 32, 712–714 CrossRef PubMed.
  17. M. C. Cameron, E. Lee, B. P. Hibler, C. A. Baker, S. Mori, M. Cardova, K. S. Nehal and A. M. Rossi, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2019, 80, 303–317 CrossRef PubMed.
  18. E. Niculet, M. Craescu, L. Rebegea, C. Bobeica, F. Nastase, G. Lupasteanu, D. J. Stan, V. Chioncel, L. Anghel, M. Lungu and A. L. Tatu, Exp. Ther. Med., 2021, 23, 1–13 CrossRef PubMed.
  19. T. Bieber, N. Engl. J. Med., 2008, 358, 1483–1494 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. M. Murphy, P. Kerr and J. M. Grant-Kels, Clin. Dermatol., 2007, 25, 524–528 CrossRef PubMed.
  21. K. Masuda-Kuroki, M. Murakami, M. Kishibe, S. Kobayashi, Y. Okubo, T. Yamamoto, T. Terui and K. Sayama, J. Dermatol., 2019, 46, 399–408 CrossRef PubMed.
  22. M. Murakami, R. Kawakami, Y. Niko, T. Tsuda, K. Yatsuzuka, H. Mori, T. Imamura and K. Sayama, J. Dermatol. Sci., 2021, 102, 130–132 CrossRef PubMed.
  23. K. Yatsuzuka, R. Kawakami, Y. Niko, T. Tsuda, K. Kameda, N. Kohri, S. Yoshida, K. Shiraishi, J. Muto, H. Mori, Y. Fujisawa, T. Imamura and M. Murakami, Sci. Rep., 2024, 14, 378 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. Y. Niko and A. S. Klymchenko, J. Biochem., 2021, 170, 163–174 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. I. A. Karpenko, M. Collot, L. Richert, C. Valencia, P. Villa, Y. Mély, M. Hibert, D. Bonnet and A. S. Klymchenko, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 405–412 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. K. T. Fam, M. Collot and A. S. Klymchenko, Chem. Sci., 2020, 11, 8240–8248 RSC.
  27. S. Oncul, A. S. Klymchenko, O. A. Kucherak, A. P. Demchenko, S. Martin, M. Dontenwill, Y. Arntz, P. Didier, G. Duportail and Y. Mély, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr., 2010, 1798, 1436–1443 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. D. Kobat, N. G. Horton and C. Xu, J. Biomed. Opt., 2011, 16, 106014 Search PubMed.
  29. S. Wang, J. Liu, G. Feng, L. G. Ng and B. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, 29, 1904861 Search PubMed.
  30. D. Li, X. Deng, Z. Xu, D. Wang, G. Xu, P. Zhang, P. Qiu, W. Xie, D. Wang, B. Z. Tang and K. Wang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2023, 33, 2300172 Search PubMed.
  31. V. H. Le, S. Lee, S. Lee, T. Wang, W. H. Jang, Y. Yoon, S. Kwon, H. Kim, S. W. Lee and K. H. Kim, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 44097 CrossRef PubMed.
  32. S. Ipponjima, T. Hibi and T. Nemoto, PLoS One, 2016, 11, e0167394 CrossRef PubMed.
  33. G. Egawa, Y. Natsuaki, Y. Miyachi and K. Kabashima, J. Dermatol. Sci., 2013, 70, 143–145 CrossRef PubMed.
  34. K. Sano, M. Asahina, T. Uehara, N. Araki, Y. Yamanaka, K. Matsumoto and R. Okuyama, J. Dermatol., 2021, 48, 439–446 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. S. Yoshida, R. Kawakami, Y. Niko, Y. Fujisawa and M. Murakami, Exp. Dermatol., 2025, 34, e70038 CrossRef PubMed.
  36. D. I. Danylchuk, S. Moon, K. Xu and A. S. Klymchenko, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 14920–14924 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. D. I. Danylchuk, E. Sezgin, P. Chabert and A. S. Klymchenko, Anal. Chem., 2020, 92, 14798–14805 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. D. I. Danylchuk, I. Khalin, Y. V. Suseela, S. Filser and A. S. Klymchenko, Anal. Chem., 2025, 97, 8268–8274 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc03047a
These authors contributed equally to this work.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.