Liang
Li
a,
Kaixiang
Ren
a,
Wenjun
Xie
a,
Qi
Yu
a,
Shilin
Wu
a,
Hai-Wen
Li
c,
Meng
Yao
d,
Zhipeng
Jiang
*ab and
Yongtao
Li
*ab
aSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243002, China. E-mail: jzp1994@ahut.edu.cn; liyongtao@ahut.edu.cn
bKey Laboratory of Efficient Conversion and Solid-State Storage of Hydrogen & Electricity of Anhui Province, Maanshan 243002, China
cSchool of Advanced Energy, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
dCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065 Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
First published on 31st March 2025
The design of novel electrolytes is crucial for ensuring the practical application of high-voltage lithium metal batteries (LMBs). Weakly solvating electrolytes (WSEs), achieved by reducing the solvent's solvation ability, have been shown to improve the cycling stability of LMBs. However, the internal relationship between the weaker solvation effects of the solvent and battery performance is not well understood. In this work, we design a series of solvents with different solvation effects, using 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) and 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) as base skeletons, and systematically examine the physicochemical and electrochemical properties of these WSEs. Our results show that the performance of WSEs is not solely determined by the solvation structure but is also influenced by the intrinsic reactivity of the solvent. Guided by this principle, we develop a high-performance electrolyte based on 2-methoxy-1,3-dioxolane (2-MeO DOL), which exhibits both weak solvation effects and low reactivity. This electrolyte enables stable cycling of Li–Cu half cells for over 250 cycles with a coulombic efficiency of 99.3% and demonstrates stable cycling in Li–LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) full cells at a 4.4 V cut-off voltage under practical conditions. This study offers critical insights for the design and high-throughput screening of next-generation high-performance WSEs for LMBs.
Conventional liquid electrolytes typically consist of Li salts, solvents, additives, and co-solvents (or diluents). Much of the research in electrolyte engineering focuses on modifying these components to optimize electrochemical performance. Liu et al. synthesized a novel Li salt, lithium (trifluoromethanesulfinyl)(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiSTFSI), which decomposes to form a bilayer interface that improves the lifespan of LMBs.11 Wang et al. introduced 1,2-diethoxypropane (DEP) as a fluoride-free solvent that broadens the electrochemical window, improving compatibility with high-voltage cathodes.12 Yan et al. developed Li2ZrF6 as a new electrolyte additive that forms an SEI rich in t-Li2ZrF6in situ, enhancing ionic conductivity and suppressing dendrite growth.13 Jiang et al. employed fluorobenzene (FB) as a cost-effective co-solvent to develop high-performance dilute high-concentration electrolytes (DHCEs) for practical LMBs.14
The solvation structure of the electrolyte plays a critical role in determining its properties, both in bulk and at the interface.15 Strongly solvating solvents such as 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME), 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) and ethylene carbonate (EC) tend to cause Li salts to dissociate fully, resulting in solvation structures enriched in solvent-separated ion pairs (SSIPs).16 Although these structures facilitate high ionic conductivity, the large number of solvent molecules in the solvation shell is adverse to anion decomposition at the interphase, creating an unstable interfacial layer. Recent studies suggest that reducing the solvation ability of solvents can alter the solvation structure, resulting in weakly solvating electrolytes (WSEs) that promote the formation of contact ion pairs (CIPs) and aggregates (AGGs).17–21 This enhances anion decomposition and stabilizes the SEI, thereby improving the cycling lifespan and high-voltage stability of LMBs. For example, the Wang group demonstrated that a tetrahydropyran (THP)-based weakly solvating electrolyte enables stable cycling of LMBs at a cutoff voltage of 4.5 V.22 Bao et al. synthesized fluorinated 1,4-dimethoxylbutane (FDMB), a novel weakly solvating solvent, which shows excellent stability on both the Li anode and high-voltage cathodes.23 Coskun et al. synthesized 1,1,1-trifluoro-2,3-dimethoxypropane (TFDMP), which increases the oxidation stability of the electrolyte to 4.8 V and prevents LiFSI-induced corrosion of aluminum foil.24 While many studies attribute improvements in cycling performance to the formation of an inner solvation sheath rich in anions resulting from WSEs, the question remains: do weaker solvation effects necessarily lead to better performance of electrolytes for LMBs?
In this study, we investigate a series of solvents with varying solvation abilities, systematically examining their solvation structures, interfacial chemistry, and electrochemical performance. As shown in Fig. 1a, we selected typical linear ether DME and cyclic ether DOL as base skeletons and introduced methyl and methoxy groups into their structures, resulting in various WSEs. While significant progress has been made in developing methylated/methoxylated DOL-based WSEs, prior research has primarily focused on elucidating solvation structures, often overlooking the intrinsic chemical reactivity of solvent species.25 Here, we systematically examine both solvation structure and solvent stability, assessing their combined influence on the electrochemical performance of LMBs. Our results reveal that the electrochemical performance of electrolytes is not solely determined by the strength of the solvation effect but is also influenced by the inherent reactivity of the solvent. Ultimately, the 2-methoxy-1,3-dioxolane (2-MeO DOL)-based electrolyte, which balances weak solvation effects with low reactivity, exhibited optimal stability for both the LMA and high-voltage cathodes. This electrolyte enabled Li–Cu half cells to cycle stably for over 250 cycles with an average coulombic efficiency (CE) of 99.3%. Furthermore, it enabled Li-NCM811 cells to cycle stably at a cutoff voltage of 4.4 V, even under low-temperature (−20 °C) and practical test conditions (50 μm Li and 14.0 mg cm−2). This work provides essential insights into the design of high-performance WSEs.
We dissolved 1.5 M lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) in the aforementioned solvents to prepare a series of electrolytes, which were subsequently analyzed for their physicochemical properties and solvation structures. As illustrated in Fig. 2a, after standing for 3 h, the DOL-based electrolyte exhibited noticeable polymerization, while the other electrolytes remained in the liquid state. This polymerization is attributed to the ring-opening polymerization of DOL induced by LiFSI.30,31 The introduction of substituents increases steric hindrance, thereby restricting the ring-opening polymerization of the cyclic ether.32 Furthermore, when metallic Li was immersed into the five electrolytes that remained stable in the liquid form, the 2-Me DOL-based electrolyte changed color from transparent to pale yellow, suggesting that 2-Me DOL is unstable in the presence of metallic Li and undergoes a chemical reaction (Fig. 2b).33 The mechanism of this reaction is illustrated in Fig. 2c. Based on these results, DME, DMP, TME, and 2-MeO DOL were selected for further study due to their stability with both the Li salt and metallic Li. We then recorded the 7Li nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of the four electrolytes, revealing chemical shifts of −1.24 ppm, −0.97 ppm, −0.94 ppm, and −0.84 ppm (Fig. 2d). These downshift trends indicate a weakening of solvation ability in the following order: DME > DMP > TME> 2-MeO DOL, which is consistent with previous computational results.34 Raman spectra were deconvoluted to determine the solvation structure distributions (Fig. 2e and S1†).35 As the solvation ability weakened, SSIP decreased while AGG increased, suggesting the formation of an anion-rich inner solvation shell in WSEs (Fig. S2–S5†). Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to gain deeper insights into the solvation structure of 2-MeO DOL (Fig. S6†). The simulations reveal that FSI− anions are the primary coordinating species in the first solvation shell of Li+ (Fig. S7†), as evidenced by radial distribution functions showing their dense spatial distribution around Li+ (Fig. S8†). These computational results corroborate the anion-rich solvation structure inferred from Raman spectroscopic analysis. These findings were further corroborated by ionic conductivity measurements, which revealed that, at varying temperatures, the ionic conductivities followed the trend: DME > DMP > TME > 2-MeO DOL, indicating that 2-MeO DOL exhibits the weakest solvation capacity (Fig. 2f). To assess the high-voltage stability of these electrolytes, we conducted linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) tests. Notably, the LSV results did not align directly with the solvation structure distribution (Fig. 2g). Despite DMP's weaker solvation, its oxidative stability was poorer than that of DME, with decomposition occurring below 3.5 V. This behavior is consistent with energy level analysis, which suggests that DMP, with a higher HOMO energy level, is more susceptible to oxidation. In contrast, 2-MeO DOL demonstrated the best oxidative stability, with a stable voltage window extending beyond 5 V. This enhanced stability is attributed to both the weak solvation structure formed by 2-MeO DOL and its low reactivity.
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) test results indicate that all electrolytes exhibit distinct peaks corresponding to the decomposition of the Li salt and solvent at approximately 1.3 V and 0.4 V (Fig. 3a).36 Notably, the intensity of the solvent decomposition peak during the reduction process is significantly higher in DMP- and TME-based electrolytes compared to DME and 2-MeO DOL electrolytes. This implies that, although an anion-rich inner solvation sheath forms in DMP and TME electrolytes, the solvents' high reactivity results in unavoidable side reactions with the Li anode during reduction. Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) measurements demonstrate that DMP and TME produce a significantly enhanced current response around 0.3 V relative to other electrolytes (Fig. S9†).37 This pronounced reduction peak suggests that these components are more prone to electrochemical decomposition, leading to the formation of unstable organic byproducts. These results are in agreement with CV data, further supporting the impact of electrolyte composition on interfacial stability. Tafel analysis reveals that the exchange current densities of the SEI formed after cycling in DME, DMP, TME, and 2-MeO DOL electrolytes are 0.11, 0.05, 0.04, and 0.35 mA cm−2, respectively (Fig. 3b). These data indicate that Li+ deposition kinetics are fastest in the 2-MeO DOL-based electrolyte, whereas the kinetics in DMP and TME electrolytes are slower, even underperforming relative to DME.38 These differences in kinetic behavior strongly influence the cycling stability of the Li anode. As shown in Fig. 3c, under cycling conditions of 0.5 mA cm−2 and 1 mA h cm−2, the DME-based electrolyte supports stable cycling for 100 cycles, albeit with significant fluctuations in CE. In contrast, DMP- and TME-based electrolytes show stable cycling for fewer than 50 cycles, with TME demonstrating much lower CE per cycle. The Li–Cu half-cell assembled with the 2-MeO DOL-based electrolyte cycles stably for over 250 cycles, maintaining a high CE of nearly 99% per cycle. We used Adams's methodology to precisely quantify the CE of these electrolytes at the Li anode (Fig. 3d).39 After 20 cycles under 1 mA cm−2 and 1 mA h cm−2 conditions, the average CEs of DME, DMP, TME, and 2-MeO DOL electrolytes were found to be 96.5%, 93.7%, 84.8%, and 99.3%, respectively. Furthermore, the Li-NCM811 cell assembled with the 2-MeO DOL-based electrolyte demonstrated superior rate performance and cycling stability. With a cutoff voltage of 4.4 V, the battery delivered a discharge capacity of 148.7 mA h g−1 at 5C and demonstrated stable cycling for over 300 cycles at 1C. By contrast, the DME-based electrolyte exhibited a discharge capacity of 114.6 mA h g−1 at 5C, with significant capacity loss after more than 150 cycles at 1C (Fig. 3e, f and S10–S17†). Despite its lower ionic conductivity, the 2-MeO DOL-based electrolyte enables Li-NCM811 cells to achieve reduced interfacial impedance (Esei) in initial-cycle electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements (Fig. S18†). This is primarily due to its anion-rich solvation structure, which drives the formation of an inorganic-rich SEI layer. Additionally, the electrolyte's high stability limits the formation of organic components, leading to a more robust and passivating interfacial layer that enhances long-term electrochemical performance. Notably, despite the presence of a high concentration of CIP and AGG in DMP and TME-based electrolytes, these systems perform worse than the DME-based electrolyte, which contains substantial SSIP. These results confirm that electrolyte performance is not solely dependent on the solvation structure but also strongly influenced by the intrinsic reactivity of the solvent.
We further investigated the effects of different electrolytes on Li deposition morphology by depositing metallic Li with the same areal capacity (3 mA h cm−2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images revealed that Li deposited from the DME-based electrolyte exhibited a porous structure, with a deposition thickness of 35.6 μm, corresponding to a 137% volume expansion relative to the theoretical thickness (15 μm) of Li (Fig. 4a and e).40,41 In the DMP-based electrolyte, the surface of the deposited Li showed no obvious pores but exhibited a significant presence of side reaction products, with a deposition thickness of 37.2 μm and a volume expansion of 148% (Fig. 4b and f). In TME-based electrolytes, the deposited Li exhibited both a porous morphology and side reaction products, with a thickness of 66.9 μm and a volume expansion rate of 346% (Fig. 4c and g). In contrast, Li deposited from the 2-MeO DOL electrolyte exhibited a compact structure with no significant porosity or side products (Fig. 4d). The deposition thickness was 19.5 μm, corresponding to a volume expansion rate of 30% (Fig. 4h). These observations explain the superior electrochemical performance of the 2-MeO DOL-based electrolyte, while TME demonstrates the poorest performance. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis revealed that, although an anion-rich inner solvation sheath forms in DMP and TME electrolytes, the high reactivity of these solvents leads to significant incorporation of side reaction products into the SEI, resulting in a C/F ratio notably higher than that in DME and 2-MeO DOL electrolytes (Fig. S19†).42 Furthermore, the LiF content in the F 1s spectra is lower in DMP and TME (Fig. 4i–l). In contrast, the SEI derived from 2-MeO DOL exhibited the lowest C/F ratio (5.01) and a higher LiF content, suggesting that 2-MeO DOL, through weak solvation effect, promotes anion decomposition while maintaining solvent stability, forming an SEI enriched in LiF, which offers enhanced protection to the Li anode (Fig. S20–S23†).
We propose the following design principles for high-performance WSEs, as shown in Fig. 5a. While DME possesses a strong solvation ability and forms a significant number of SSIP structures, its low reactivity results in simultaneous moderate anion and solvent decomposition at the electrode–electrolyte interface, which limits its ability to improve the performance of LMBs. DMP and TME are weakly solvating solvents that promote the formation of CIP and AGG structures. However, their high intrinsic reactivity leads to substantial anion and solvent decomposition at the interface, resulting in the formation of SEIs rich in organic components, which hinders stable cycling performance. In contrast, 2-MeO DOL, with its combination of weak solvating ability and low reactivity, promotes anion decomposition while inhibiting solvent decomposition. This balance facilitates the formation of an SEI that is rich in inorganic components, significantly enhancing the performance of LMBs. To verify this conclusion, we assembled a practical Li-NCM811 full cell utilizing the 2-MeO DOL-based electrolyte under practical conditions (50 μm Li and 14.0 mg cm−2). Under cycling conditions of 0.5C/1C, the conventional carbonate electrolyte (1 M LiPF6 in EC/DEC) showed only 17% capacity retention after 120 cycles. In contrast, the Li-NCM811 full cell using the 2-MeO DOL-based electrolyte retained 76% of its initial capacity after the same number of cycles (Fig. 5b, S24 and S25†). Post-mortem analysis of these batteries showed that the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern intensity of the NCM811 cathode cycled with the 2-MeO DOL electrolyte was higher than that of the cathode cycled with the carbonate electrolyte, suggesting a lower level of side reaction products (Fig. S26†).43 Moreover, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis of the cycled Li anode confirmed that the anion-rich CEI formed by 2-MeO DOL effectively mitigates active material loss (Fig. S27†).44 The F 1s spectrum of the cathode obtained by XPS analysis showed higher LiF content in the 2-MeO DOL electrolyte compared to the carbonate electrolyte, confirming its superior ability to promote anion decomposition (Fig. S28 and S29†). Additionally, 2-MeO DOL maintains good conductivity at low temperatures, enabling stable cycling of the Li-NCM811 cell at −20 °C for over 200 cycles at 0.5C, with 74% capacity retention, while the carbonate electrolyte, which freezes under similar conditions, renders the Li-NCM811 cell failure (Fig. 5c and S30†).45 This suggests that the weakly solvated and low-reactive 2-MeO DOL-based electrolyte can enable stable cycling of LMBs under complex operating conditions.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc01495f |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |