Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: Novel phenoxyacetic herbicides synthesized from longifolene-derived primary amine for sustainable weed management
Yanqun Huang
a,
Pingping Lub,
Hongyun Lanb,
Daozhan Huang*b,
Yu Fengb,
Fengguo Yab,
Ziqi Gaob,
Jiaxin Wenb and
Ziqiang Zhaob
aSchool of Materials and Environment, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530105, China
bKey Laboratory of Chemistry and Engineering of Forest Products, State Ethnic Affairs Commission, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Chemistry and Engineering of Forest Products, Engineering Research Center of Low-carbon and High-quality Utilization of Forest Biomass, University of Guangxi, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530006, China. E-mail: huangdaozhan@gxmzu.edu.cn
First published on 24th November 2025
Abstract
Correction for ‘Novel phenoxyacetic herbicides synthesized from longifolene-derived primary amine for sustainable weed management’ by Yanqun Huang et al., RSC Adv., 2025, 15, 38251–38259, https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA05630F.
The authors regret that the original article contains an error in affiliation a. The correct affiliation is as displayed herein.
aSchool of Materials and Environment, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530105.
The authors also regret an error in the Graphical Abstract of the original article. The correct version of the Graphical Abstract is shown below.
The authors also regret an error in Scheme 1 of the original article. The R1 substituent of compound 6c is CH3 instead of H. The correct reaction scheme is shown below.
 | ||
| Scheme 1 Synthetic route of target compounds 6a–6d (i) CH3COOH, (HCHO)n, reflux, 24 h; (ii) CH3COCl, reflux, 1 h; (iii) potassium phthalimide, DMF, 2 h; (iv) N2H4·H2O, NaOH, reflux, 6 h; (v) absolute alcohol, 80 °C, 1.5 h; (vi) glyphosate, deionized water, RT, 30 min. | ||
Finally, the authors also regret an error in the description of the comparison of the IC50 value of compound 6d against Lolium multiflorum Lam. with that of GLYP-IPAM salt appearing in lines 10–11, page 38255 of the original article. The correct version is:
“The IC50 value of compound 6d against Lolium multiflorum Lam. root growth was higher than that of GLYP-IPAM salt, but lower than GLYP-IPAM salt against Lolium multiflorum Lam. shoot growth.”
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |