Shazidul Hussaina,
Dipan Sarmab,
Sangita Majumdera,
Debajyoti Bhattacharjeea,
Khuloud A. Alibrahimc,
Abdullah N. Alodhayb
d,
Hemant Agarwale and
Syed Arshad Hussain
*a
aThin Film and Nanoscience Laboratory, Department of Physics, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, Agartala 799022, Tripura, India. E-mail: sa_h153@hotmail.com; sahussain@tripurauniv.ac.in; Fax: +913812374802; Tel: +91940212250
bDepartment of Botany, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, Agartala 799022, Tripura, India
cDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
dResearch Chair for Tribology, Surface, and Interface Sciences, Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
eBarcelona School of Telecommunications Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona Tech, Carrer de Jordi Girona, 1-3, Les Corts, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
First published on 2nd June 2025
Recently, pesticide contamination has become a major threat to public health and ecosystems owing to its widespread and uncontrolled use in agriculture. Herein, we introduce a paper-based colorimetric sensing platform using polydiacetylene (PDA) that can be used as an efficient and cost-effective method for detecting pesticide residues. The sensor is designed on a nitrate cellulose membrane using 10,12-henicosadiynoic acid (HCDA), monomer of PDA, green-synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and saponite clay (SC). The AgNPs were synthesized from Araucaria heterophylla leaf extract following a green synthesis protocol. The synthesized AgNPs were characterized through UV-Vis absorption, FESEM, TEM, DLS, XRD and FTIR spectroscopy. Moreover, the PDA phase change in the presence of AgNPs was optimized by varying AgNP concentration. The designed paper sensors responded to three commonly used pesticides, namely, cypermethrin (P1), pretilachlor (P2) and chlorpyriphos/cypermethrin (P3). It was found that the detection of different pesticides in different concentration regions can be achieved by varying AgNP to HCDA ratios. To determine pesticide concentration from the colorimetric response, a MATLAB-based program was developed for analyzing the RGB values corresponding to colour changes before and after exposure. The proposed sensor is similar to litmus paper in which sensing is achieved based on the visible colour change upon pesticide exposure. Therefore, it is economical and easy to use. This pesticide-detecting sensor provides measurements with high accuracy in a wide range of ambient conditions and is therefore a perfect portable system for point-of-care/on-site detection of pesticide residues.
Sl no. | Materials | Target analytes | Limit of detection | Selectivity test | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PDA & AgNP | N/A | N/A | N/A | 27 |
2 | PDA and silica NP | Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide | N/A | N/A | 28 |
3 | PDA and Au/Ag NPs | Organic solvents | N/A | Yes | 29 |
4 | PDA and AuNPs | N/A | N/A | N/A | 30 |
5 | PDA & zinc oxide NPs | Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide | N/A | N/A | 31 |
6 | PDA and AuNPs | Pb2+ | N/A | Yes | 32 |
7 | PDA and AuNPs | Thrombin | N/A | N/A | 33 |
8 | PDA and magnetite (Fe3O4) | Sodium cetyltrimethylammonium bromide and streptavidin | 30 μM | N/A | 34 |
9 | PDA and AuNPs | N/A | N/A | N/A | 35 |
10 | PDA and AgNPs | N/A | N/A | N/A | 36 |
11 | PDA and AuNPs | N/A | N/A | N/A | 37 |
12 | PDA and AuNPs | Human immunoglobulin E | 0.1 ng mL−1 | Yes | 38 |
13 | PDA and Fe3O4 NPs | Magnetic field | N/A | N/A | 39 |
14 | PDA/silica nanocomposite | Temperature | N/A | N/A | 40 |
15 | PDA and AgNPs | N/A | N/A | N/A | 41 |
16 | PDA and AgNPs | N/A | N/A | N/A | 42 |
17 | PDA and AgNPs | N/A | N/A | N/A | 43 |
18 | PDA and AgNPs | N/A | N/A | N/A | 44 |
19 | PDA and AgNPs | Temperature | N/A | N/A | 26 |
20 | PDA and AgNPs | N/A | N/A | N/A | 45 |
21 | PDA and AgNPs | N/A | N/A | N/A | 46 |
22 | AChE:AuNPs | Paraoxon (pesticide) | 60 μM | Yes | 8 |
23 | AuNP | Malathion (pesticide) | 139 mg L−1 | Yes | 9 |
24 | Ag–Au | Malathion (pesticide) | 1189 mg L−1 | Yes | 9 |
25 | RB-AuNPs | Thiodicarb (pesticide) | 0.08 mg L−1 | Yes | 10 |
26 | PDA-PAM | Malathion (pesticide) | 8 mM | Yes | 11 |
27 | PDA-HBA | Organophosphate compounds (pesticide) | N/A | Yes | 12 |
28 | PDA/AgNP | Pesticide P1 | 194.76 ppm | Yes | This work |
Pesticide P2 | 114.45 ppm | ||||
Pesticide P3 | 101.1 ppm |
PDAs are smart conjugate colour-responsive materials that can be easily formed by UV irradiation upon the photopolymerization of diacetylene (DA) supramolecules without any chemical catalyst/inhibitor or any sophisticated system.13,14 Owing to the conjugated polymeric ene-yne structure of the PDAs, a strong inter-chain interaction prevents the rotation of the side chain, leading to a significant π-orbital overlapping in the ene–yne backbone. As a result, PDAs absorb the visible radiation and usually turn blue in colour.15 In response to various external stimuli such as temperature,16 pH,17 mechanical stress,18 solvents,19 metal ions,20 and biomolecules,13 the blue PDA changes its colour to the purple/red colour that can be observed with the naked eye.13,15,21 Because of this unique and intriguing colour changing properties, over the decades, PDAs have been exploited to develop different types of sensors such as biosensors,13,22 chemosensors23 and other optical sensing applications.24 By the incorporation of PDAs with other matrix molecules, or head group structural modification in DA monomers, they can be tuned to interact more strongly with specific target analytes, resulting in colour transformation.25,26 This provides selectivity towards target analytes. In this study, green-synthesized AgNPs were incorporated into a PDA matrix for better sensitivity and selectivity. The combination of PDAs with nanomaterials shows great potential for developing eco-conscious sensing platforms. In particular, the mixing of green-synthesized AgNPs with PDAs offers a promising path for pesticide detection. The designed sensor was tested with three locally used pesticides, and satisfactory results were obtained. The proposed sensor is like a litmus paper, and its colour change indicates the presence of pesticides. This is a passive sensor and requires no power supply. Accordingly, it is economic and easy to use without the requirement of any instrument or expert operation. Thus, it can minimize several limitations that exist with the sophisticated pesticide detection techniques. Such sensors not only can address the environmental concern, but also can lay a strong foundation for sustainable sensor technology.
Peaks present in the plant extract | Peaks present in the synthesized AgNPs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Wavenumber (cm−1) | Probable functional group | Wavenumber (cm−1) | Probable functional group |
3261 | –OH stretching vibration with polyphenols present in the plant53 | 2914 | –CH stretching vibration53 |
2928 | –CH stretching vibration53 | 2381 | O![]() ![]() |
2352 | C–O stretching vibrations55 | 2313 | O![]() ![]() |
1600 | N–H bending of amine56 | 1613 | Stretching mode of the carboxylate group (COO−)56 |
1388 | N–H bending of amide III57 | 1513 | C![]() |
1238 | Vibration of the C–O group of the hydroxyl flavonoids59 | 1371 | C–N stretching vibrations60 |
1019 | C–N stretching vibrations of primary amines61 | 1220 | C–N stretching vibrations62 |
774 | Originate from the out-of-plane deformational C–H vibrations indicating the presence of polyphenol63 | 1017 | C–N stretching vibrations of primary amines61 |
671 | C–C ring stretching vibration64 | 772 | Originate from the out-of-plane deformational C–H vibrations indicating the presence of polyphenol63 |
628 | C–C ring stretching vibration64 | 618 | C–X– stretching vibration of chloride group |
The FTIR spectrum of the plant extract showed several distinct absorption bands (Table 2). These absorption bands are related to various functional groups present in the plant extract. A broad absorption peak is observed at 3261 cm−1 corresponding to the –OH stretching vibration. This peak is typically associated with the presence of polyphenols, which are known for their antioxidant properties and play a critical role in the reduction of metal ions during nanoparticle synthesis.53 Another significant peak is observed at 2928 cm−1, corresponding to the –CH stretching vibrations, which indicate the presence of aliphatic hydrocarbons within the plant extract.53 The absorption peak at 2352 cm−1 is ascribed to the C–O stretching vibrations, suggesting the presence of carbonyl compounds that may participate in the reduction and stabilization of AgNPs.55 Additionally, a peak at 1600 cm−1 is assigned to N–H bending vibrations, indicating the presence of amine groups, which are potential capping agents for the NPs.56 The peak at 1388 cm−1 corresponds to the N–H bending vibrations of Amide III, suggesting the presence of proteins or peptides that could contribute to the stabilization of the synthesized NPs.57 The FTIR spectrum further shows a peak at 1238 cm−1 due to the vibration of the C–O group of hydroxyl flavonoids, known to facilitate the reduction of metal ions during NP synthesis.59 The C–N stretching vibrations of primary amines are observed at 1019 cm−1. This indicates the presence of nitrogenous compounds that may influence the NP formation.61 Additionally, the peaks at 774 cm−1 and 671 cm−1 are associated with the out-of-plane deformation of C–H vibrations and C–C ring stretching vibrations, respectively. This confirmed the presence of polyphenols and aromatic compounds in the plant extract.63,64
The FTIR spectrum of the synthesized AgNPs shows significant shifts and changes compared to the plant extract (Fig. S2 of the ESI† and Table 2). The peak corresponding to the –CH stretching vibrations shifts slightly from 2928 cm−1 in the plant extract to 2914 cm−1 in the AgNPs, which suggests the involvement of aliphatic hydrocarbons in the NP synthesis.53 Notably, the spectrum shows a new peak at 2381 cm−1 that corresponds to the OC
O stretching vibrations of carbonyl bond groups. This suggests that the carbonyl compounds present in the plant extract contribute to the stabilization of AgNPs.54 Additionally, the appearance of a peak at 1613 cm−1 is associated with the stretching mode of the carboxylate group (COO−), which indicates that carboxylate ions are binding to the surface of the AgNPs. The presence of COO− enhances the stability of synthesized NPs.56 The spectrum also shows a peak at 1513 cm−1 corresponding to C
C aromatic stretching, indicating the role of aromatic compounds in the stabilization of the NPs. Another notable peak appearing at 1371 cm−1 corresponds to the C–N stretching vibrations, which suggests that amine groups from the plant extract are involved in the capping of NPs.61 Additionally, the C–N stretching vibration observed at 1220 cm−1 also indicates the presence of amine groups that are involved in the capping of NPs.62 The C–N stretching vibrations of primary amines observed at 1017 cm−1 further support the role of nitrogenous compounds in NP formation.61 The peak at 772 cm−1 is consistent with that for the plant extract, which indicates the presence of polyphenols. These polyphenols play a key role in the reduction and stabilization of AgNPs.63 The new peak at 618 cm−1 is attributed to the C–X stretching vibration of the chloride group, possibly involved in the NP formation process.
One of the most significant observations is the complete disappearance of the broad absorption band at 3261 cm−1 in the FTIR spectrum of the AgNPs, which was present in the plant extract. This disappearance shows that the hydroxyl groups, particularly from polyphenols, are actively consumed during the reduction of Ag+ to AgNPs. The absence of this peak in the AgNPs' spectrum indicates that –OH groups likely served as electron donors. These electron donors help in the reduction of Ag+ to Ag0 and play an important role in the stabilization of the NPs.
The FTIR analysis provides evidence of the successful synthesis of AgNPs using the plant extract. The observed shifts, appearance and disappearance of specific absorption bands in the FTIR spectrum of the synthesized AgNPs compared to the plant extract confirm the active participation of various functional groups in the reduction and stabilization processes. The complete disappearance of the 3261 cm−1 peak indicates the critical role of hydroxyl groups. These hydroxyl groups are particularly from polyphenols that served as both reducing agents and stabilizers for the AgNPs.
The crystallite size was calculated using Debye–Scherrer's equation: D = 0.9λ/βcos
θ, where D is the crystallite size, λ indicates the wavelength of Cu-Kα X-ray radiation (1.5406 Å), β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in radians, and θ is the Bragg angle. The average calculated crystallite size was found to be 47.70 nm [Table 3]. The presence of other additional minor peaks may indicate the presence of residual biomolecules from the plant extract. Overall, the XRD results confirmed the successful synthesis of highly crystalline AgNPs with an FCC structure.
Peak Pos. [°2θ] | FWHM left [°2θ] | d-spacing [Å] | Miller indices (hkl) plane | Crystallite size (nm) | Average crystallite size (nm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
38.146 | 0.1023 | 2.35922 | 111 | 82.17 | 47.70 |
44.420 | 0.5628 | 2.03949 | 200 | 15.25 | |
64.510 | 0.1248 | 1.44336 | 220 | 75.27 | |
77.468 | 0.5616 | 1.23108 | 311 | 18.13 |
Therefore, it can be concluded that typical AgNPs were formed. However, differences in particle size were observed among the results from FESEM, TEM, DLS, and XRD. It may be noted that electron microscopy and DLS are two different techniques and work on different principles. The DLS sizes depend on the particle physical model, whereas the FESEM sizes depend on the interaction between electron beams with the sample. Therefore, it is difficult to compare the particle sizes measured by FESEM and DLS. DLS is an indirect method that depends on the optical environment, which can lead to differences in particle size. DLS measures the hydrodynamic diameter of a particle that includes the ionic shell that surrounds the particle. This can significantly affect the measured particle size.46 In the present case, DLS measurement was done for AgNPs in water dispersion. Therefore, water molecules may surround the NP leading to an increase in hydrodynamic diameter. Despite these discussed variations in particle size arising from the different analytical techniques, the obtained results are in close agreement with previously reported findings.70
The differences in particle sizes across these techniques are due to the unique principles of each technique. While TEM and FESEM measure the dry core particle size, DLS provides the hydrodynamic diameter, which includes surface-bound phytochemicals and solvation layers. XRD, however, estimates the crystallite size. Such differences in the size of NPs are well reported.71
In the preceding section of the manuscript, we have discussed the synthesis as well as characterization of AgNPs. However, the main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of such NPs on the colorimetric phase behaviour of PDA, so that the PDA-AgNP system can be applied towards designing pesticide sensors. The results of the corresponding investigation have been reported in the following section.
In the present case, it has been tried to optimize the phase behaviour of PDAs mixed with AgNPs to design a pesticide sensor. In order to study the phase behavior of the pure PDA and PDA/AgNP mixed system, the self-standing films were transferred onto hydrophobic quartz glass substrates and exposed to external stimuli including UV light and heat for varying duration. Corresponding UV-Vis absorption spectra and colour change of the film have been recorded. The UV-Vis absorption spectra of the pure HCDA, AgNP and HCDA/AgNP mixed self-standing films for three different mixing ratios were investigated upon exposure to UV light as well as temperature. The UV-Vis absorption spectra of pure AgNPs under various UV-exposure doses are shown in Fig. S3 of the ESI.† Pure AgNPs show the absorption band at 472 nm in the absence of UV exposure, which is slightly shifted with respect to the same in liquid dispersion [Fig. 1b, S3 of the ESI†]. This slight shift in peak position may be related to differences in the aggregation states of NPs when transferred onto a solid substrate.73 Upon UV exposure, the absorption spectrum of AgNPs hardly shows any change [Fig. S3 of the ESI†]. The absorption spectra of the AgNP film remained almost the same. This shows that the optical characteristics and overall appearances of the NPs remained almost unaffected upon UV exposure. This also indicates very good stability or lack of any significant UV-induced alterations of AgNPs.
The UV-Vis absorption spectra of the pure HCDA and HCDA/AgNP mixed film of 5%, 10%, and 15% of AgNPs upon UV-irradiation, followed by the heat treatment, are shown in Fig. 6a–d, respectively. It has been observed that prior to UV exposure, i.e. before polymerization, HCDA did not absorb any light due to the lack of conjugated double bonds that are required for excited-state electronic transitions.74 After 5 seconds of UV irradiation, an absorption band has appeared at 673 nm [Fig. 6a]. The absorption band is associated with the blue phase of PDA.13,22 This indicates that the HCDA monomer has begun to polymerize. PDA blue peak originates due to the rotation polymeric backbone accompanied by the straightening of an alkyl chain of HCDA that effects the overall conformation of the polymer backbone from planar to nonplanar configuration.15 The absorption peak shifted to 650 nm with a hump at 594 nm upon 1 minute of UV irradiation. These absorption peaks are also associated with the blue phase of PDA.19,22,75 It is obvious from Fig. 6a that with 1 minute of UV irradiation, the absorbance has become maximum. The blue phase peaks started to shift towards the red phase when the UV exposure time was increased further. After 45 minutes of UV exposure, the absorption band shifted to 562 and 502 nm, leaving a trace of blue PDA with 652 nm absorption peak [Fig. 6a]. These 562 nm and 502 nm bands correspond to PDA's red phase.13,22,23,26,64 This indicates that at this stage both blue and red phases of PDAs co-exist. The reason behind the shifting of absorption band from 674 nm to 562 nm is that when UV light is irradiated on PDA, the high-energy photons got absorbed by the PDA. The absorbed UV energy stimulates electrons along PDA-conjugated-bonds, allowing them to transit from the ground state to higher energy states. The excited electrons of PDA take part in the photochemical reaction known as photo-polymerization. Prolonged exposure to UV radiation causes thermochromism.76,77 Moreover, the photo-polymerization results in the formation of longer polymer chains, altering the molecular structure of PDA. The photopolymerization reaction increases the conjugation length of PDA chains as well. Longer conjugation lengths cause the shift of the absorption spectra. When the UV exposure increased further, the intensity corresponding to blue phase of PDA gradually decreased, while the intensity of absorption peak corresponding to red phase was increased. After 90 minutes of exposure, there was no further change in spectral profile upon increase in UV exposure time. Both blue and red phases co-existed at this stage. Therefore, complete transition from blue to red form of PDA was not possible upon UV exposure. However, upon temperature treatment, it has been observed that complete transition from blue phases of PDA to its red phase occurred.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 UV-Vis absorption spectra of (a) pure HCDA, (b) HCDA/AgNP (5%), (c) HCDA/AgNP (10%), and (d) HCDA/AgNP (15%) upon UV-irradiation and heat treatment. The exposure time is given in the inset. |
The initial phase behaviour of HCDA in the presence of AgNPs was almost similar to that of pure HCDA. Here, in the case of three mixing ratios, it was observed that before UV exposure HCDA remained as a monomer with almost no absorption.22 The corresponding absorption spectra are shown in Fig. 6b–d, respectively, for 5%, 10% and 15% of AgNPs in the HCDA/AgNP system. Upon UV exposure initially, the absorption peaks due to the blue phase of PDA appeared, which increases with UV exposure time. Although, after certain exposure time, peaks due to the red phase slowly appeared at the expense of blue phase absorption peaks. However, for complete transition from blue PDA to red PDA, temperature treatment was required. The interesting thing is that here the onset of blue as well as red phase of PDA was strongly dependent on the percentage of AgNPs in the HCDA/AgNP system. The phase behaviour of PDA in the presence of 10% of AgNPs was very interesting (Fig. 6c and Table 4). Here, the intensity of the peak corresponding to the blue phase increases significantly with a shift of peak from 667 nm to 647 nm after 1 min of UV exposure. The increase in absorbance shows the extent of polymerization of HCDA molecule in the film to its blue phase. The absorbance of the peak at 643 nm becomes maximum after 5 min of UV exposure. This indicates that most of the HCDA molecules in the HCDA/AgNP (10%) mixed film had polymerized to its blue form [Fig. 6c]. When the UV dosage time is gradually increased interestingly after 15 minutes of UV exposure, the peak at 574 nm corresponding to the red phase appeared, whereas pure HCDA required 45 min to start blue-to-red transition. The onset of blue-to-red PDA phase transition at earlier time indicates that the PDA is more sensitive to the analytes in this system. This clearly shows the effect of AgNPs towards the phase change behaviour of PDAs. Such behaviour is probably due to the photodegradation process caused by the strongly enhanced photoexcitation.41 It has been reported that DA chains are densely arranged on the NP surface and form bilayered organization, which might also enhance the potential of the phase changing behaviour.46 It may also be mentioned in this context that there may be interaction between the –COOH group of PDA and the –OH group on the AgNP surface in the PDA/AgNP system.26,78 This may give rise to the formation of nanohybrids with a core–shell structure, where the ordered layer of PDA molecules may facilitate better exposure of PDA molecules to external stimuli, resulting in improved polymerization.26 On further increasing the dosages of UV exposure time, the intensity of blue peak decreases, while the intensity of the red peaks increases as of pure PDA. Information about PDA phase change as extracted from the UV-Vis absorption spectra in the presence of 5%, 10%, and 15% AgNP mixed system and that of pure HCDA are presented in Table 4.
Sensing system | UV exposure time to convert HCDA monomer to HCDA blue phase | UV exposure time to starting convert blue HCDA to red HCDA | Temperature at which complete blue to red conversion occurred |
---|---|---|---|
Pure HCDA | 1 min (650 nm and 594 nm) | 45 min (561 nm and 502 nm) | 55 °C (552 nm and 492 nm) |
HCDA/AgNP (5%) | 10 min (631 nm and 574 nm) | 45 min (615 nm and 558 nm) | 55 °C (544 nm and 502 nm) |
HCDA/AgNP (10%) | 5 min (643 nm and 585 nm) | 15 min (628 nm and 550 nm) | 55 °C (552 nm and 500 nm) |
HCDA/AgNP (15%) | 10 min (629 nm and 578 nm) | 30 min (625 nm and 551 nm) | 45 °C (552 nm and 492 nm) |
From Table 4, it is observed that the PDA phase change was faster in the presence of AgNPs than that of pure PDA. Maximum response was observed in the case of HCDA/AgNP mixed system with 10% of AgNP.
The UV-Vis absorption spectra of the pure PDA-based system before and after exposure to the three pesticides at different concentrations are shown in Fig. 7a–c. Initially, PDAs were converted into their blue forms upon UV exposure. Therefore, before exposure, prominent peaks corresponding to the blue phase appeared and no absorption peaks corresponding to red phase were observed [Fig. 7a–c]. The absorption spectra measured after exposure to three pesticides indicate that the PDA phase changes from blue to red polymers occurred in the presence of pesticides. This was confirmed by the decrease in absorption peaks due to the PDA blue phase and the corresponding increase in the PDA red phase. Here, the PDA responded to all the three pesticides. However, the extent of phase change was strongly dependent on the pesticide concentration. In order to quantify the PDA blue-to-red phase transition, the % CR was calculated for all the three pesticides, as shown in Fig. 7d. From the CR analysis, it was observed that in the case of P1, the PDA phase conversion started at a concentration of 0.12 (v/v) and maximum blue-to-red transition was 52% for the concentration of 0.3 (v/v). PDA phase conversion started at 0.06 (v/v) for both P2 and P3. Maximum blue-to-red conversion was 60% and 62% at a concentration of 0.3 (v/v) for the pesticides P2 and P3, respectively.
We also exposed the HCDA/AgNP system at different concentrations of AgNPs to three pesticides under investigation. It is expected that here the blue-to-red phase change of PDA might be different compared to the pure PDA. This is because it has been observed that the presence of AgNPs affected the PDA phase behaviour. Before doing that we exposed the pure AgNP film to the pesticides at different concentrations and the corresponding absorption spectra were recorded. However, hardly any change in the spectral profile was observed for all the three pesticides at different concentrations (Fig. S4 of the ESI†). This indicates that hardly any change occurred in the case of pure AgNPs in the presence of pesticides.
The UV-Vis absorption spectra of the HCDA/AgNP system with 5%, 10% and 15% of AgNPs before and after exposure to three pesticides P1, P2 and P3 at different concentration are shown in Fig. 8, Fig. 9 and 10, respectively. The maximum % CR and PDA phase change starting concentration for all the three HCDA/AgNP systems under investigation are listed in Table 5. It was observed that for all the three HCDA/AgNP systems, blue-to-red phase conversion occurred, although the phase change was strongly dependent on the AgNP concentration in the system and on the concentration and type of pesticides.
Phase change starting concentration (v/v) | Maximum % CR at 0.3 (v/v) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | P2 | P3 | P1 | P2 | P3 | |
Pure HCDA | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 52 | 60 | 62 |
HCDA/AgNP (5%) | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 73 | 79 | 45 |
HCDA/AgNP (10%) | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 100 | 100 | 59 |
HCDA/AgNP (15%) | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 50 | 87 | 90 |
For HCDA/AgNP (5%), the PDA phase change started for P1 and P3 at a concentration of 0.06 (v/v) and for P2 at a concentration of 0.12 (v/v) [Fig. 8 and Table 5]. The maximum blue-to-red PDA phase change conversion was 73%, 79% and 45% for the three pesticides P1, P2 and P3, respectively.
In the case of HCDA/AgNP (10%), the PDA phase change started at a concentration of 0.06 (v/v) for all the three pesticides and 100% blue-to-red phase conversion of PDA occurred for both P1 and P2. In the case of P3, the same was 59% [Fig. 9 and Table 5].
In the case of the HCDA/AgNP (15%) system, PDA blue-to-red phase conversion started at a pesticide concentration of 0.06 (v/v) for P1 and P2. In the presence of P3, the blue-to-red conversion started at a concentration of 0.18 (v/v). The PDA blue-to-red phase conversion was 50%, 87% and 90%, respectively, in the presence of three pesticides P1, P2 and P3 [Fig. 10 and Table 5].
From the % CR analysis, it has been observed that the pure HCDA-based sensing system showed limited chromatic response (% CR < 64%) and partial blue-to-red phase transition upon pesticide exposure. However, the addition of AgNPs improved the chromatic response, and almost 100% PDA blue-to-red phase change occurred in the presence of pesticides P1 and P2 when the AgNP concentration was 10% in the HCDA/AgNP system. In the case of pesticide P3, the maximum blue-to-red conversion (90%) occurred when the AgNP concentration was 15%.
Here, we prepared four sets of sensors employing HCDA with different amounts of AgNPs, viz. (i) Pure HCDA, (ii) HCDA/AgNP (5%), (iii) HCDA/AgNP (10%) and (iv) HCDA/AgNP (15%). All the four sets of sensors were exposed to three pesticides at different concentrations. The physical demonstration of the sensor is shown in Fig. S5 of the ESI.† From the % CR analysis, it was observed that the HCDA phase change from blue to red occurred in the presence of these pesticides. Based on these phase change, colours of the sensors change from blue to red upon pesticide exposure, although the extent of colour change was different for different sensors and concentrations of pesticides. Such colour change was visible for the naked eyes. However, sometimes, it has become a challenge to understand and quantify the colour change. Therefore, in order to gain better insights into the colorimetric response, RGB analysis of the images of sensors before and after exposure were analyzed using the MATLAB software.72 Based on the analysis, the normalized signal intensity (NSI) was calculated using the relation NSI = (R/B)/(R0/B0), where R0, B0 and R, B are the values of the red and blue components before and after exposure to pesticides.80
Fig. 11 shows the time- and concentration-dependent colorimetric response of pure HCDA-based paper sensors exposed to (a) pesticide P1, (b) pesticide P2, and (c) pesticide P3. Visible colour changes and corresponding NSI plots show that the sensors responded to the presence of pesticides. However, the extent of response depends on the types of pesticides as well as their concentration and exposure time. From Fig. 11, it was been observed that when the HCDA paper-based sensor was exposed to pesticide P1 and P3, almost no visual colorimetric change was detected initially, even at higher pesticide concentrations [Panels a and c, Fig. 11]. The lack of response was observed within the first 10 minutes of exposure for all tested pesticides, including concentrations up to 0.3 v/v, though there is a minute increase in NSI values. However, when the sensor was exposed to P2 after 1 min, it started to show colorimetric transformation at concentrations of 0.24 (v/v) and 0.3 (v/v) [panel b, Fig. 11]. With the increase in exposure time for P2, it was observed that the NSI value also increases. Here also colour change was not observed up to a concentration of 1.8%, while a negligible increase in NSI was observed.
The colorimetric response of the HCDA/AgNP (5%) sensor is shown in Fig. 12. Unlike that of pure HCDA, here marked colour changes were observed for all the pesticides. The colour change becomes prominent at a higher concentration of pesticides with a higher exposure time. In the case of P1, the sensor responded at a pesticide concentration of 0.18 (v/v) and higher with an exposure time of 1 min. From the NSI plot (Fig. 12a), it was observed that the sensor responded well to a concentration of 0.18 (v/v) or higher and maximum blue-to-red conversion occurred within 4 min. However, for pesticide P2, the sensor showed a visible response with an exposure time of 2–3 min for a concentration of 0.18 (v/v) or higher. Approximately after 6 min of exposure, maximum colour transformation occurred. In the case of pesticide P3, the response is less than that of pesticide P1 and pesticide P2. Here, the sensor responded to a higher concentration with a longer exposure duration.
In the case of HCDA/AgNP (10%), the colorimetric response was better. Here, the colour change occurred with less exposure time and at a lower concentration. Immediately after exposure (<1 s) and even for 0.06 (v/v) of pesticide P1, marked visible colour changes were observed [panel a, Fig. 13]. In the case of pesticide P2, the sensor responded to a concentration of 0.12 (v/v) or higher with an exposure time of 2 min [panel b, Fig. 13].
However, for pesticide P3, the sensor responded well to only a high concentration of 0.3 (v/v) with an exposure time of 5 min [panel c, Fig. 13]. The HCDA/AgNP (10%) sensor showed better response to pesticide P1 and P2 than all the other sensors under investigation. The limits of detection for P1 and P2 were calculated as 194.76 ppm and 114.45 ppm, respectively. The limit of detection was calculated based on an earlier report.81 The colorimetric responses along with the NSI plot for the HCDA/AgNP (15%) sensor to the three pesticides under investigation are shown in Fig. 14.
It was observed that for pesticide P1, the colour change started from the concentration of 0.12 v/v [panel a, Fig. 14]. Additionally, the intensity of the colour change increased with the increase in concentration but reached saturation after 2 min. The plot of NSI versus time supported this observation. The extent of colour change was higher than that of the pure HCDA-based sensor, as confirmed by the % CR analysis. For pesticide P2, marked colour change started at a concentration of 0.12 v/v [panel b, Fig. 14]. It has been observed that the intensity of the colour change increased with the increase in pesticide concentrations and time but reached saturation after 5–8 minutes. For the detection of pesticide P3, the HCDA/AgNP (15%) sensor showed a better chromatic response than that of all the other sensors. The limit of detection was found to be 101.1 ppm.81 The information about the response time and the concentration of pesticides at which the sensors responded to all the four sensors is given in Table 6.
Sensor composed of | Response to pesticide P1 | Response to pesticide P2 | Response to pesticide P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum concentration (v/v) | Response time (min) | Minimum concentration (v/v) | Response time (min) | Minimum concentration (v/v) | Response time (min) | |
Pure HCDA | 0.3 | 1 | 0.24 | 1 | 0.3 | 10 |
HCDA/AgNP (5%) | 0.18 | 1 | 0.18 | 2 | 0.24 | 8–10 |
HCDA/AgNP (10%) | 0.06 | Less than 1 min | 0.06 | Less than 1 min | 0.3 | 5 |
HCDA/AgNP (15%) | 0.12 | 1 | 0.12 | 2-3 | 0.18 | 10 |
In the PDA/AgNP system, AgNPs are negatively charged and have high affinity towards the carboxylate group of PDA. In addition, there exists the H-bond that could interact with the carboxylate group of PDA head part via ionic interactions. The intermolecular H-bond within the PDA structure may facilitate the adsorption of PDA on the surface of AgNP.78 Overall, sphere-like structures are formed in which AgNPs are surrounded by PDA [Fig. 15]. The formation of single bilayer structures of HCDA in the colloid has been reported.46 In the present case, when the PDA/AgNP system was exposed to pesticides, the pesticide molecules may be incorporated in between the ordered layers of PDA within the PDA/AgNP nanohybrid complex26,78 [Fig. 15]. This may result in the straightening of hydrocarbon chains of PDA, leading to the attainment of red phase at a faster rate than that in the case of pure PDA. It has been reported that such straightening of PDA chains influence the attainment of red phase.82,83
The present sensor responded to three pesticides, namely, P1, P2 and P3. In order to check the selectivity of the designed sensor, the sensors have been tested with other two pesticides, namely, urea and glyphosate. However, no significant response was observed [Fig. S6 of the ESI†].
The observed selectivity in sensing performance can be attributed to the molecular characteristics of the pesticides. The tested pesticides—P1, P2 and P3—contain hydrophobic moieties and specific functional groups (such as halogens and aromatic rings) that allow their incorporation within the PDA layers, leading to a visible color change. However, urea and glyphosate do not induce a response, probably due to their strongly hydrophilic nature and different charge distributions, which hinder their effective incorporation into the PDA/AgNP complex. Unlike the previously tested pesticides, these molecules may not interact efficiently with the PDA matrix or disrupt its ordered structure, thereby preventing the colorimetric transition. The presence of different ionic or highly polar functional groups in these molecules may also play a role in their lack of interaction with the AgNP-PDA system.
This selective response suggests that both the structural compatibility of the three pesticides under investigation with the PDA layers and their ability to interact with the AgNP-PDA matrix play crucial roles in governing the sensing mechanism.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra01243k |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |