Charlene
Harriswangler
a,
Brooke L.
McNeil
bc,
Isabel
Brandariz-Lendoiro
a,
Fátima
Lucio-Martínez
a,
Laura
Valencia
d,
David
Esteban-Gómez
a,
Caterina F.
Ramogida
*bc and
Carlos
Platas-Iglesias
*a
aUniversidade da Coruña, Centro Interdisciplinar de Química e Bioloxía (CICA) and Departamento de Química, Facultade de Ciencias, 15071, A Coruña, Galicia, Spain. E-mail: carlos.platas.iglesias@udc.es
bDepartment of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada. E-mail: caterina_ramogida@sfu.ca
cLife Sciences Division, TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, Canada
dDepartamento de Química Inorgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidade de Vigo, As Lagoas, Marcosende, 36310 Pontevedra, Spain
First published on 11th March 2025
Correction for ‘Exploring the use of rigid 18-membered macrocycles with amide pendant arms for Pb(II)-based radiopharmaceuticals’ by Charlene Harriswangler et al., Inorg. Chem. Front., 2024, 11, 1070–1086, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3QI02354K.
“The 207Pb NMR spectra of the complexes display signals in the range −2178 to −2255 ppm, referenced to Pb(CH3)4, with the cyclohexyl derivatives providing slightly more negative chemical shifts and the glycinate derivatives slightly more positive shifts (Fig. 4). The similar δ values observed for the four complexes point to comparable Pb(II) coordination environments. The 207Pb NMR signals observed here are shielded by ∼1500 ppm with respect to those reported for EDTA derivatives60,67 and [Pb(DOTAM)]2+.68 Similar negative chemical shift were also reported for complexes with crown ether derivatives.64”
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2025 |