Revealing the energy transfer between NIR-II PEGylated quantum dots and water

Mingzhe Wang ab, Sisi Ling b, Ziyan Zhang ab, Yejun Zhang *b, Hongchao Yang b and Qiangbin Wang *ab
aSchool of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China. E-mail: qbwang2008@sinano.ac.cn
bCAS Key Laboratory of Nano-Bio Interface, Division of Nanobiomedicine and i-Lab, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China. E-mail: yjzhang2009@sinano.ac.cn

Received 11th November 2024 , Accepted 22nd February 2025

First published on 24th February 2025


Abstract

Hydrophilic semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) with photoluminescence (PL) located in the second near-infrared window (NIR-II) have shown great promise for in vivo bioimaging applications. However, their performance can be affected by the strong water absorption in this spectral region, which results in severely reduced NIR-II PL intensity. Herein, we use a PEG polymer modified with a hydrophobic alkyl chain (–C11H22–) to decorate non-toxic NIR-II Ag2S (Ag2S–C11–PEG) QDs. The incorporation of the alkyl chain minimizes the energy transfer process from QDs to water molecules. As a result, the Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs exhibit superior PL intensity with approximately three-fold enhancement compared to the Ag2S QDs coated with PEG without modification (Ag2S–PEG). Furthermore, the PEG tail in the QDs ensures the biocompatibility of the probe. Ultimately, the Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs have been demonstrated to have potential as high-performance probes for in vivo bioimaging, exhibiting excellent brightness and metabolizable ability. This work showcases a valid strategy for advancing NIR-II QDs in high-performance bioimaging applications.



10th anniversary statement

It has been a privilege to witness the growth of Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers over the past decade. My journey with the journal began in 2017, when I first participated in its 2nd ICF Symposium at Nanjing University, and I have since watched it evolve into a leading platform for cutting-edge research in inorganic chemistry. The journal has played a crucial role in fostering global collaboration and pushing the boundaries of scientific discovery. Attending the 10th anniversary symposium in 2024 at Dalian University of Technology was a truly rewarding experience, as it allowed me to reflect on the journal's progress and engage with brilliant minds in the field. The breadth of innovative research showcased reaffirms the journal's commitment to excellence and its pivotal role in shaping the future of inorganic chemistry. I am grateful to be part of this exciting journey and look forward to its more insightful contributions.

Introduction

In vivo fluorescence imaging analysis represents a valuable method in a number of medical contexts, including clinical trials and cancer research.1–7 Known as the “biological-tissue transparency window”, the second near infrared region (NIR-II) (1000–1700 nm) is an optimal spectral window for bioimaging due to the reduced tissue scattering and autofluorescence noise that is hardly available in other regions.8,9 Therefore, colloidal semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) with NIR-II emission are widely used in in vivo imaging.8,10–17 For biological application, the NIR-II QDs are required to disperse in aqueous solvent.18–24 However, water molecules exhibit strong absorption in the NIR-II region (especially at 1200 and 1400 nm) owing to the bending and stretching vibration of the hydroxyl group (–OH),25 which will lead to photoluminescence (PL) drop of QDs and significant interference of the imaging results.26

Recently, we have discovered that energy transfer (ET) occurs between hydrophilic NIR-II QDs and water when the PL emission of QDs overlaps with the absorption spectrum of water. This phenomenon contributes significantly to the decrease in the PL intensity of hydrophilic NIR-II QDs.27 To address this issue, employing amphiphilic ionic surfactants to create a hydrophobic interface on the QDs has proven to be an effective strategy for inhibiting the ET process. However, the potential biological toxicity and colloidal characteristics of these amphiphilic ionic surfactants pose limitations for their further application in the bioimaging of QD–surfactant systems.

Polyethylene glycol (PEG), as a highly biocompatible hydrophilic polymer, is commonly used for the surface functionalization of nanoparticles in biomedical applications.28–37 PEGylated QDs with PL emission in the NIR-II window have been extensively applied in bioimaging, but they also experience PL reduction due to the ET process.38–44 In this study, building on our previous research, we have developed a PEG polymer modified with a hydrophobic alkyl chain (–C11H22–), which serves as a surface ligand to decorate silver sulfide (Ag2S) QDs with a PL emission peak at 1200 nm (Ag2S–C11–PEG). The incorporation of the alkyl chain results in a three-fold enhancement in the PL intensity of Ag2S QDs in aqueous solvents, and significantly prolongs the PL lifetime to a level comparable to that of QDs dispersed in non-aqueous solvents. These findings suggest that the alkyl chain creating the hydrophobic interface effectively suppresses the ET from Ag2S QDs to water molecules. Finally, the Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs have demonstrated their potential as high-performance bioimaging probes, exhibiting excellent brightness and good metabolizing ability after intravenous injection into the tails of nude mice. This work showcases a valid strategy to design advancing NIR-II QDs by inhibiting ET for more effective bioimaging applications.

Results and discussion

We first prepared Ag2S QDs decorated with 1-dodecanethiol (DDT) according to our previous work,2 as shown in Fig. S1. Then, the HS–PEG and HS–C11–PEG ligands (Fig. 1a) were modified on Ag2S QDs via the ligand exchange method, denoted as Ag2S–PEG (Fig. 1b) and Ag2S–C11–PEG (Fig. 1c). Both QDs demonstrated excellent dispersibility in water and chloroform, respectively, as evidenced by the linear relationship between PL intensity and QD concentration (Fig. S2). Fig. 1d and S3 depict the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and corresponding particle size distribution statistics of Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs, indicating their similar morphology, particle size and monodispersity. The optical properties of Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG were tested and recorded at room temperature. In Fig. 1e, the two QDs dispersed in water with the same concentration display almost coinciding absorption curves, suggesting that the different PEG ligands hardly transform the structure of the semiconductor core in the QDs. The PL emission spectra in Fig. 1e show that the two QDs present identical PL emission curves with a peak located at about 1200 nm. The non-Gaussian symmetry of PL spectra is due to the stretching vibration of C–H at 1155 nm of the polymer ligands to absorb the photon emitted by QDs. Interestingly, the Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs demonstrate a three-fold enhancement in PL intensity compared with Ag2S–PEG. The absolute photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs in water is up to 4.8% (Fig. S4), even higher than those of several hydrophobic Ag2S QDs obtained by conventional oil-phase synthesis.12,13 Subsequently, time-resolved PL spectra of both QDs in water are presented in Fig. 1e. According to the fitted lifetime, Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs possess a longer PL lifetime (81 ns) than Ag2S–PEG QDs (28 ns), which indicates that the increase of PL originates from the suppression of the non-radiative ET process in the Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs solution.45–47
image file: d4qi02869d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) Structures of SH–PEG and HS–C11–PEG. Schematic illustration of Ag2S–PEG (b) and Ag2S–C11–PEG (c) QDs. (d) TEM images of Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs. (e) Room-temperature absorption and PL spectra of Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs dispersed in water. (f) Time-resolved PL spectra of Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG in water.

Then, we investigated the PL emission of the two QDs dispersed in different solvents to further prove the PL enhancement and prolonged PL lifetime originating from the suppression of the ET process. As described in Fig. 2a and b, compared with the Ag2S–PEG QDs in water, the Ag2S–PEG QDs in chloroform exhibit about 6.25-fold enhanced PL intensity because of the strong absorption of water molecules at 1200 nm. This was verified by the PL spectrum of Ag2S–PEG QDs in deuteroxide (D2O) (Fig. S5). Since D2O possesses negligible absorption at 1200 nm, the Ag2S–PEG QDs in D2O display higher PL intensity than the QDs in H2O. The PL decrease of Ag2S–PEG QDs depends on the overlap of the QD fluorescence spectra and water molecule's absorption (Fig. S6). The PL drop can also be observed in PbS–PEG QDs. As shown in Fig. S7, due to strong absorption of water in the 1400–1600 nm range, PEG-capped PbS QDs with emission at 1537 nm when dispersed in water show intense PL quenching and shortened PL lifetime. When utilizing a PEG polymer with alkyl chain modification as a surface ligand to treat Ag2S QDs, the steady PL spectra of Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs show that the QDs in chloroform exhibit only a 2.02-times increase in PL intensity compared with that of the QDs in water, and luminescence intensity close to that of Ag2S–PEG in chloroform (Fig. 2a and b). According to these, the efficiency of ET (ηET) can be approximately calculated to be 31.3%.


image file: d4qi02869d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) PL emission spectra, (b) relative PL intensity and (c) time-resolved PL spectra of Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs dispersed in chloroform and water, respectively. Both Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs can be well-dispersed in water or chloroform.

Time-resolved PL spectra in Fig. 2c show that the Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs give a similar PL lifetime in both water and chloroform, which suggested that Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs in the two solvents possess the same exciton recombination process, and their PL decrease in water (Fig. 2a) is due to the resonance absorption of –OH.48,49 As to Ag2S–PEG, the QDs in water present a much shorter PL lifetime of ∼28 ns than that of QDs in chloroform (86 ns), which indicates the existence of additional nonradiative-exciton-recombination ET channels in Ag2S–PEG dispersed in water. Based on the chain length of the PEG ligand (Fig. S8), we think that the ET mechanism in this system is mainly attributed to Förster resonance energy transfer, which occurs at a distance of 2–10 nm.50 The mechanism is further corroborated by femtosecond transient absorption (TA) spectra (Fig. S9 and S10). These indicate that the incorporation of the alkyl chain suppresses the ET process from the Ag2S core to water molecules. In addition, we have also studied the effect of donor–acceptor distance by utilizing three typical SH–Cn–PEG ligands with different hydrophobic chain lengths coated on Ag2S QDs (n = 3, 11, 18). As shown in Fig. S11, we found that Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs exhibit the highest PL intensity, which may result from the insufficient inhabitation of ET when n = 3 and the low ligand density for the large steric hindrance at n = 18.

In order to explore this process in terms of the energy gained by water, we evaluated the photothermal efficiency (η) of Ag2S–C11–PEG and Ag2S–PEG QDs according to the following three equations.51

 
τs = mdcd/(hS)(1)
 
Q0 = hS(Tmax,waterTsurr)(2)
 
image file: d4qi02869d-t1.tif(3)
where τs is the time constant of heat transfer; md is the unit mass of water (md = 1 g), cd is the heat capacity of water at room temperature [cd = 4.2 J (g °C)−1], hS is the product of the heat-transfer coefficient and the surface area for radiative heat transfer, Q0 is the heat dissipated from light absorbed by the quartz sample cell, Tsurr is the temperature of surroundings and Tmax,water and Tmax,sys are the temperatures of water and QD solution in the cell after 600 s exposure with the laser, I is the incident laser power and A1064 is the absorbance of QDs at a 1064 nm wavelength.

Fig. 3a describes the typical plot of temperature versus time obtained from laser irradiation of an optically transparent sample cell filled with Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG at room temperature. A 1064 nm laser with 1 W cm−2 was used for resonance irradiation. In this experiment, the temperature of Ag2S–PEG increased from an ambient value of Tsurr = 25.1 °C to a maximum equilibrium value of Tmax = 48.7 °C after 600 s exposure, while Ag2S–C11–PEG increased from Tsurr = 25.1 °C to Tmax = 44.8 °C under the same conditions. Then irradiation with the laser was discontinued and the sample was allowed to cool, returning to a value of Tsurr = 25.5 °C in equilibrium with surroundings.


image file: d4qi02869d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) Temperature of the sample increases during a 600 s continuous irradiation period by a 1 W cm−2 beam at 1064 nm and returns to its ambient value at thermal equilibrium with the surroundings after discontinuing irradiation. (b) Time constant for heat transfer from the system is determined as τs by applying the linearized energy balance to temperature–time data from the cooling period.

To ascertain the efficiency of transducing light to heat of the two QDs, the temperature data were subjected to a linearised energy fitting derived from a description of microscale thermal dynamics in the system. The temperature versus time data recorded during the cooling period as shown in Fig. 3b demonstrate the time constants of heat transfer for Ag2S–PEG as τs = 353.7 s and for Ag2S–C11–PEG as τs = 323.8 s, which represent the negative inverse slope of ln[thin space (1/6-em)]θ with respect to time, denoted as ln[thin space (1/6-em)]θ = −t/τs. To circumvent the issue of scatter that arises when the logarithmic operand approaches zero, the data were truncated at 900 seconds. The evaluation of time constants with cooling data permitted the avoidance of effects of thermal gradients during the heating process. By substituting the obtained τs into equation eqn (1) and (2), it is possible to obtain hS and Q0 for the two QDs: Ag2S–PEG with hS = 0.01187, Q0 = 0.1086 and Ag2S–C11–PEG with hS = 0.01297, Q0 = 0.1167. The photothermal efficiency η of Ag2S–PEG is 88%, while that of Ag2S–C11–PEG is 69%. This result demonstrates that the introduction of the C11 chain impedes the occurrence of energy transfer from the perspective of the energy gained by water, and the low energy transfer efficiency consequently leads to low photothermal conversion efficiencies.

Then, we evaluated the performances of the Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs for in vivo NIR-II fluorescence (FL) imaging. Before the in vivo imaging, the biocompatibility of the two QDs was evaluated. A methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay was executed with mouse fibroblast L929 cells. Fig. S12 illustrates that L929 cells retained their viability under the culture with different concentrations of QDs without statistic variation, revealing their remarkably negligible cytotoxicity because QDs modified with PEG often exhibit distinctive advantages in biocompatibility.52,53 Subsequently, the well-prepared Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs were injected intravenously into the Balb/c-nude mice at a dosage of 5 mg kg−1, respectively. Then, in vivo NIR-II imaging was executed in real-time to monitor the behavioural differences of the two QDs. The time course of NIR images in Fig. 4a indicates that the Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs exhibited exceptional capabilities of high-contrast in vivo imaging than Ag2S–PEG QDs. To visually assess the difference, the quantitative curves of FL intensity are shown in Fig. 4b, and suggest that the NIR-II fluorescence signal of the Ag2S–C11–PEG QD group was more than three-times higher than that of the Ag2S–PEG QD group at the peak signal, which is consistent with the brighter Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs exhibited in Fig. 1e. Subsequently, the NIR-II FL signals gradually decreased with the passage of time due to the metabolism of the QD probes. In addition, we then collected the NIR fluorescence images of the dissected organs after the injection of QDs for 24 h. The results in Fig. 4c, d, and S13 show that NIR fluorescence signals were captured in the liver, stomach and intestine, which also indicated that the two QDs could be metabolized by the hepatobiliary pathway. Encouragingly, obvious NIR fluorescence signals were captured in the faeces of the mice at different time points (Fig. S14), which further confirmed the above conclusion. Moreover, the stomach exhibited the most intense NIR-II signal, highlighting the high metabolic efficiency of the QDs. Notably, the introduction of an alkyl chain into the PEG structure led to varying distributions of the two QD probes across primary organs. The presence of the hydrophobic group promotes the aggregation of the QDs in the liver. These findings have significant implications for the design of probes tailored for various bio-applications and for advancing our understanding of bio-interface interactions.


image file: d4qi02869d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) Real-time in vivo NIR-II FL imaging of mice with an intravenous injection of 5 mg kg−1 QDs to monitor the behavioral differences of two QDs of Ag2S–PEG and Ag2S–C11–PEG QDs. (b) Quantitative curves of FL intensity in vivo. FL signal distribution of Ag2S–PEG (c) and Ag2S–C11–PEG (d) QDs in primary organs.

Conclusions

In summary, we have designed a PEG polymer modified with a hydrophobic alkyl chain (–C11H22–) to decorate NIR-II Ag2S QDs. As a result, the incorporation of the alkyl chain suppresses the energy transfer process from the QDs to water molecules, leading to a near three-fold enhancement in PL intensity and a prolonged PL lifetime of the QDs. Furthermore, the PEG structure also maintains the biocompatibility of the QD probe. These new modified NIR-II QDs are as well demonstrated with high performance for in vivo bioimaging with excellent brightness and metabolizable ability. This study is of great significance for the design and investigation of the surface chemistry on hydrophilic QDs, thereby facilitating enhanced bioimaging in medical applications.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Qiangbin Wang and Yejun Zhang. Methodology: Mingzhe Wang, Ziyan Zhang, and Sisi Ling. Investigation: Mingzhe Wang, Ziyan Zhang, and Sisi Ling. Formal analysis: Mingzhe Wang, Ziyan Zhang, and Sisi Ling. Supervision: Hongchao Yang and Qiangbin Wang. Writing – original draft: Mingzhe Wang and Sisi Ling. Writing – review and editing: Mingzhe Wang, Sisi Ling, Yejun Zhang, Hongchao Yang and Qiangbin Wang.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its ESI.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22127808 and 22271308), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (Grant No. XDB0520301), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20222016 and 20221262). The authors thank Suzhou NIR-Optics Technologies Co., Ltd for its instrumental and technical support in NIR-II imaging. The authors are grateful for the PL test support from Nano-X from Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (SINANO).

References

  1. R. Weissleder and M. J. Pittet, Imaging in the Era of Molecular Oncology, Nature, 2008, 452, 580–589 CrossRef CAS.
  2. Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, C. Li, X. Chen and Q. Wang, Controlled Synthesis of Ag2S Quantum Dots and Experimental Determination of the Exciton Bohr Radius, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 4918–4923 CrossRef CAS.
  3. B. Dong, C. Li, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, M. Deng and Q. Wang, Facile Synthesis of Highly Photoluminescent Ag2Se Quantum Dots as a New Fluorescent Probe in the Second Near-Infrared Window for in Vivo Imaging, Chem. Mater., 2013, 25, 2503–2509 CrossRef CAS.
  4. Y. Gu, R. Cui, Z. Zhang, Z. Xie and D. Pang, Ultrasmall Near-Infrared Ag2Se Quantum Dots with Tunable Fluorescence for in Vivo Imaging, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 134, 79–82 CrossRef PubMed.
  5. J. Son, D. Choi, M. Park, J. Kim and K. S. Jeong, Transformation of Colloidal Quantum Dot: From Intraband Transition to Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance, Nano Lett., 2020, 20, 4985–4992 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. Y. Zhang, H. Yang, X. An, Z. Wang, X. Yang, M. Yu, R. Zhang, Z. Sun and Q. Wang, Controlled Synthesis of Ag2Te@Ag2S Core-Shell Quantum Dots with Enhanced and Tunable Fluorescence in the Second Near-Infrared Window, Small, 2020, 16, 2001003 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. Y. Du, B. Xu, T. Fu, M. Cai, F. Li, Y. Zhang and Q. Wang, Near-Infrared Photoluminescent Ag2S Quantum Dots from a Single Source Precursor, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 1470–1471 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. C. Li and Q. Wang, Challenges and Opportunities for Intravital Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Technology in the Second Transparency Window, ACS Nano, 2018, 12, 9654–9659 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. A. M. Smith, M. C. Mancini and S. Nie, Bioimaging: Second Window for In Vivo Imaging, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2009, 4, 710–711 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. C. Li, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, F. Wu and Q. Wang, Advanced Fluorescence Imaging Technology in the Near-Infrared-II Window for Biomedical Applications, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 14789–14804 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. F. Wang, F. Ren, Z. Ma, L. Qu, R. Gourgues, C. Xu, A. Baghdasaryan, J. Li, I. E. Zadeh, J. W. N. Los, A. Fognini, J. Qin-Dregely and H. Dai, In Vivo Non-Invasive Confocal Fluorescence Imaging Beyond 1700 nm Using Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2022, 17, 653–660 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. C. P. Ding, Y. J. Huang, Z. Y. Shen and X. Y. Chen, Synthesis and Bioapplications of Ag2S Quantum Dots with Near-Infrared Fluorescence, Adv. Mater., 2021, 33, 2007768 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. Y. Li, P. Zhang, W. Tang, K. J. McHugh, S. V. Kershaw, M. Jiao, X. Huang, S. Kalytchuk, C. F. Perkinson, S. Yue, Y. Qiao, L. Zhu, L. Jing, M. Gao and B. Han, Bright, Magnetic NIR-II Quantum Dot Probe for Sensitive Dual-Modality Imaging and Intensive Combination Therapy of Cancer, ACS Nano, 2022, 16, 8076–8094 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. A. Zebibula, N. Alifu, L. Xia, C. Sun, X. Yu, D. Xue, L. Liu, G. Li and J. Qian, Ultrastable and Biocompatible NIR-II Quantum Dots for Functional Bioimaging, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2017, 28, 1703451 CrossRef.
  15. X. Shi, S. Chen, M.-Y. Luo, B. Huang, G. Zhang, R. Cui and M. Zhang, Zn-Doping Enhances the Photoluminescence and Stability of PbS Quantum Dots for In Vivo High-Resolution Imaging in the NIR-II Window, Nano Res., 2020, 13, 2239–2245 CrossRef CAS.
  16. S. Jeong, J. Song, W. Lee, Y. M. Ryu, Y. Jung, S. Y. Kim, K. Kim, S. C. Hong, S. J. Myung and S. Kim, Cancer-Microenvironment-Sensitive Activatable Quantum Dot Probe in the Second Near-Infrared Window, Nano Lett., 2017, 17, 1378–1386 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. Z. Q. Sun, C. Liu, H. C. Yang, X. H. Yang, Y. J. Zhang, H. Z. Lin, Y. Y. Li and Q. B. Wang, AgAuSe Quantum Dots with Absolute Photoluminescence Quantum Yield of 87.2%: The Effect of Capping Ligand Chain Length, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 8555–8563 CrossRef CAS.
  18. S. Ling, X. Yang, C. Li, Y. Zhang, H. Yang, G. Chen and Q. Wang, Tumor Microenvironment-Activated NIR-II Nanotheranostic System for Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Peritoneal Metastasis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 7219–7223 Search PubMed.
  19. H. Yang, H. Huang, X. Ma, Y. Zhang, X. Yang, M. Yu, Z. Sun, C. Li, F. Wu and Q. Wang, Au-Doped Ag2Te Quantum Dots with Bright NIR-IIb Fluorescence for In Situ Monitoring of Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis in a Hindlimb Ischemic Model, Adv. Mater., 2021, 33, 2103953 CrossRef CAS.
  20. H. D. A. Santos, I. Zabala Gutierrez, Y. Shen, J. Lifante, E. Ximendes, M. Laurenti, D. Mendez-Gonzalez, S. Melle, O. G. Calderon, E. Lopez Cabarcos, N. Fernandez, I. Chaves-Coira, D. Lucena-Agell, L. Monge, M. D. Mackenzie, J. Marques-Hueso, C. M. S. Jones, C. Jacinto, B. Del Rosal, A. K. Kar, J. Rubio-Retama and D. Jaque, Ultrafast Photochemistry Produces Superbright Short-Wave Infrared Dots for Low-Dose In Vivo Imaging, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 2933 Search PubMed.
  21. A. Benayas, F. Ren, E. Carrasco, V. Marzal, B. del Rosal, B. A. Gonfa, Á. Juarranz, F. Sanz-Rodríguez, D. Jaque, J. García-Solé, D. Ma and F. Vetrone, PbS/CdS/ZnS Quantum Dots: A Multifunctional Platform for In Vivo Near-Infrared Low-Dose Fluorescence Imaging, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2015, 25, 6650–6659 CrossRef CAS.
  22. Z. Y. Liu, A. A. Liu, H. Fu, Q. Y. Cheng, M. Y. Zhang, M. M. Pan, L. P. Liu, M. Y. Luo, B. Tang, W. Zhao, J. Kong, X. Shao and D. W. Pang, Breaking through the Size Control Dilemma of Silver Chalcogenide Quantum Dots via Trialkylphosphine-Induced Ripening: Leading to Ag2Te Emitting from 950 to 2100 nm, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 12867–12877 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. W. Lian, D. Tu, P. Hu, X. Song, Z. Gong, T. Chen, J. Song, Z. Chen and X. Chen, Broadband Excitable NIR-II Luminescent Nano-Bioprobes Based on CuInSe2 Quantum Dots for the Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells, Nano Today, 2020, 35, 100943 Search PubMed.
  24. X. Zhang, W. Wang, L. Su, X. Ge, J. Ye, C. Zhao, Y. He, H. Yang, J. Song and H. Duan, Plasmonic-Fluorescent Janus Ag/Ag2S Nanoparticles for In Situ H2O2-Activated NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging, Nano Lett., 2021, 21, 2625–2633 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. V. S. Langford, A. J. McKinley and T. I. Quickenden, Temperature Dependence of the Visible-Near-Infrared Absorption Spectrum of Liquid Water, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001, 105, 8916–8921 CrossRef CAS.
  26. G. Hong, S. Diao, J. Chang, A. L. Antaris, C. Chen, B. Zhang, S. Zhao, D. N. Atochin, P. L. Huang, K. I. Andreasson, C. J. Kuo and H. Dai, Through-Skull Fluorescence Imaging of the Brain in a New Near-Infrared Window, Nat. Photonics, 2014, 8, 723–730 Search PubMed.
  27. H. C. Yang, R. F. Li, Z. Q. Sun, Y. J. Zhang, H. B. Zhan, X. Y. Chen and Q. B. Wang, Unveiling the Energy Transfer Mechanism Between Aqueous Colloidal NIR-II Quantum Dots and Water, J. Chem. Phys., 2023, 159, 014709 CrossRef CAS.
  28. Y. Xiao, Q. Liu, A. J. Clulow, T. Li, M. Manohar, E. P. Gilbert, L. de Campo, A. Hawley and B. J. Boyd, PEGylation and Surface Functionalization of Liposomes Containing Drug Nanocrystals for Cell-Targeted Delivery, Colloids Surf., B, 2019, 182, 110362 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. Y. J. Cho and J.-P. Jee, Hydrogel Lenses Functionalized with Surface-Immobilized PEG Layers for Reduction of Protein Adsorption, Asian J. Pharm., 2016, 11, 148–149 Search PubMed.
  30. M. Park, Y. Jeong, H. S. Kim, W. Lee, S. H. Nam, S. Lee, H. Yoon, J. Kim, S. Yoo and S. Jeon, Quenching-Resistant Solid-State Photoluminescence of Graphene Quantum Dots: Reduction of π-π Stacking by Surface Functionalization with POSS, PEG, and HDA, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2102741 Search PubMed.
  31. K. M. Hansson, S. Tosatti, J. Isaksson, J. Wetterö, M. Textor, T. L. Lindahl and P. Tengvall, Whole Blood Coagulation on Protein Adsorption-Resistant PEG and Peptide Functionalised PEG-Coated Titanium Surfaces, Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 861–872 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. I. Abánades Lázaro, S. Haddad, S. Sacca, C. Orellana-Tavra, D. Fairen-Jimenez and R. S. Forgan, Selective Surface PEGylation of UiO-66 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Stability, Cell Uptake, and pH-Responsive Drug Delivery, Chem, 2017, 2, 561–578 Search PubMed.
  33. S. Zhang, W. Li, J. Luan, A. Srivastava, V. Carnevale, M. L. Klein, J. Sun, D. Wang, S. P. Teora, S. J. Rijpkema, J. D. Meeldijk and D. A. Wilson, Adaptive Insertion of a Hydrophobic Anchor into a Poly(ethylene glycol) Host for Programmable Surface Functionalization, Nat. Chem., 2022, 15, 240–247 CrossRef PubMed.
  34. M. Moros, B. Hernáez, E. Garet, J. T. Dias, B. Sáez, V. Grazú, Á. González-Fernández, C. Alonso and J. M. de la Fuente, Monosaccharides versus PEG-Functionalized NPs: Influence in the Cellular Uptake, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 1565–1577 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. Y. Tian, Z. Gao, N. Wang, M. Hu, Y. Ju, Q. Li, F. Caruso, J. Hao and J. Cui, Engineering Poly(ethylene glycol) Nanoparticles for Accelerated Blood Clearance Inhibition and Targeted Drug Delivery, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 18419–18428 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. K. Hashiba, Y. Sato and H. Harashima, pH-labile PEGylation of siRNA-Loaded Lipid Nanoparticle Improves Active Targeting and Gene Silencing Activity in Hepatocytes, J. Controlled Release, 2017, 262, 239–246 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. X. He, G. Sathishkumar, K. Gopinath, K. Zhang, Z. Lu, C. Li, E.-T. Kang and L. Xu, One-Step Self-Assembly of Biogenic Au NPs/PEG-Based Universal Coatings for Antifouling and Photothermal Killing of Bacterial Pathogens, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 421, 130005 CrossRef CAS.
  38. C. Yang, H. Wang, S. Yokomizo, M. Hickey, H. Chang, H. Kang, T. Fukuda, M. Y. Song, S. Y. Lee, J. W. Park, K. Bao and H. S. Choi, ZW800-PEG: A Renal Clearable Zwitterionic Near-Infrared Fluorophore for Potential Clinical Translation, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 13847–13852 CrossRef CAS.
  39. J. Bai, Y. Liu and X. Jiang, Multifunctional PEG-GO/CuS Nanocomposites for Near-Infrared Chemo-Photothermal Therapy, Biomaterials, 2014, 35, 5805–5813 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  40. T. Ye, Y. Lai, Z. Wang, X. Zhang, G. Meng, L. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhou, J. Deng, M. Wang, Y. Wang, Q. Zhang, X. Zhou, L. Yu, H. Jiang and X. Xiao, Near Infrared Neuromodulation: Precise Modulation of Gold Nanorods for Protecting against Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias via Near-Infrared Neuromodulation, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, 29, 1902128 CrossRef.
  41. T. Aliya, Y. Hui, Z. Chao, S. Wanlu, Z. Yuanyuan, J. Yiming, G. Yueqing and L. Yi, Nitroso-Caged Upconversion Luminescent Prodrug: Near Infrared Light-Activatable NO Nano-Donor for Gas Therapy, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 430, 132858 Search PubMed.
  42. X. Xue, H. Zhang, H. Liu, S. Wang, J. Li, Q. Zhou, X. Chen, X. Ren, Y. Jing, Y. Deng, Z. Geng, X. Wang and J. Su, Rational Design of Multifunctional CuS Nanoparticle-PEG Composite Soft Hydrogel-Coated 3D Hard Polycaprolactone Scaffolds for Efficient Bone Regeneration, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2202470 CrossRef CAS.
  43. W. Yin, J. Yu, F. Lv, L. Yan, L. R. Zheng, Z. Gu and Y. Zhao, Functionalized Nano-MoS2 with Peroxidase Catalytic and Near-Infrared Photothermal Activities for Safe and Synergetic Wound Antibacterial Applications, ACS Nano, 2016, 10, 11000–11011 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. N. Ma, M.-K. Zhang, X.-S. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Feng and X.-Z. Zhang, NIR Light-Triggered Degradable MoTe2 Nanosheets for Combined Photothermal and Chemotherapy of Cancer, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1801139 CrossRef.
  45. L. J. Pan, J. W. Tu, L. L. Yang, Z. Q. Tian and Z. L. Zhang, Photoluminescence Enhancement of NIR-II Emissive Ag2S Quantum Dots via Chloride-Mediated Growth and Passivation, Adv. Opt. Mater., 2022, 10, 2102806 CrossRef CAS.
  46. R. Du, X. Li, Y. Li, Y. Li, T. Hou, Y. Li, C. Qiao and J. Zhang, Cation Exchange Synthesis of Aliovalent Doped InP QDs and Their ZnSexS1−x Shell Coating for Enhanced Fluorescence Properties, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2023, 14, 670–676 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  47. Y. Li, Y. Li, X. Li, T. Hou, C. Qiao, Y. Tai, X. Gu, D. Zhao, L. Sang and J. Zhang, Microreactor Platform for Continuous Synthesis of Electronic Doped Quantum Dots, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 9647–9653 CrossRef CAS.
  48. R. Deng, Y. He, Y. Qin, Q. Chen and L. Chen, Measuring Pure Water Absorption Coefficient in the Near-Infrared Spectrum (900–2500 nm), J. Remote Sens., 2012, 16, 192 CrossRef.
  49. V. S. Langford, A. J. McKinley and T. I. Quickenden, Temperature Dependence of the Visible-Near-Infrared Absorption Spectrum of Liquid Water, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001, 105, 8916–8921 CrossRef CAS.
  50. J. T. DuBose and P. V. Kamat, Energy Versus Electron Transfer: Managing Excited-State Interactions in Perovskite Nanocrystal–Molecular Hybrids, Chem. Rev., 2022, 122, 12475–12494 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  51. D. K. Roper, W. Ahn and M. Hoepfner, Microscale Heat Transfer Transduced by Surface Plasmon Resonant Gold Nanoparticles, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 3636–3641 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  52. J. Toro-Mendoza, L. Maio, M. Gallego, O. Ferdinand, Y. Shen and I. Coluzza, Bioinspired Polyethylene Glycol Coatings for Reduced Nanoparticle–Protein Interactions, ACS Nano, 2023, 17, 955–965 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  53. C. Sacchetti, M. Khatereh, M. Andrea, P. Graziana, M. Maurizio, B. Sergio and B. Massimo, Surface Polyethylene Glycol Conformation Influences the Protein Corona of Polyethylene Glycol-Modified Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Potential Implications on Biological Performance, ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 1974–1989 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4qi02869d

This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.