Marina
Perieteanu
a,
Tayner Rodriguez
Garzon
bc,
Leah M. C.
McGee
a,
Abedawn I.
Khalaf
a,
Colin J.
Suckling
a,
Rebecca
Beveridge
a,
Vicky M.
Avery
bc and
Fraser J.
Scott
*a
aDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. E-mail: fraser.j.scott@strath.ac.uk
bDiscovery Biology, Centre for Cellular Phenomics, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
cSchool of Environment & Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
First published on 16th October 2024
There were an estimated 249 million cases of malaria globally in 2022, causing approximately 608000 deaths. Most of these are attributed to infection by P. falciparum. Strathclyde minor groove binders (S-MGBs) are a promising new class of anti-infective agent that have been shown to be effective against many infectious organisms, including P. falciparum. A panel of 25 S-MGBs was synthesised, including those bearing an amidine tail group, and their antiplasmodial activity against 3D7 and Dd2 strains was determined in vitro using an asexual P. falciparum imaging assay. Determination of activity against HEK293 cells allowed for selective cytotoxicity to be measured. DNA binding studies were carried out using native mass spectrometry and DNA thermal shift assays. A comparison of 3D7 (chloroquine sensitive) and Dd2 (chloroquine resistant) potency showed no evidence of cross-resistance across the S-MGB set. S-MGB-356, S-MGB-368 and S-MGB-359, amidine tail containing S-MGBs, were identified as the most promising hit compounds based on their selectivity indices (HEK293/3D7) of >612.6, >335.8 and >264.8, respectively. S-MGB-356, S-MGB-368 and S-MGB-359 were confirmed to bind to DNA as dimers, with gDNA thermal shifts (ΔTm) of 12 °C, 3 °C and 16 °C, respectively. Together, these data demonstrate that amidine tail bearing S-MGBs are promising hit compounds against P. falciparum, and can be further optimised into lead compounds.
Parasite resistance has emerged to all current antiplasmodial drug classes, including the front-line artemisinin combination therapies.3 Recently, several new small molecules have progressed through to clinical trials or in vivo studies (reviewed in [2]), however concerns remain due to the rapid acquisition of resistance reported in the last decade. The scope of drug discovery efforts needs to broaden to encompass molecules with alternative mechanisms of action, particularly those less susceptible to drug resistance, to address the current situation.
Minor groove binders (MGBs) are a class of small molecules that exert their biological effects through binding to the minor groove of double stranded DNA (dsDNA). This binding event disrupts the normal processing of the DNA through either direct occlusion, or indirect topological changes, of a DNA-protein interaction.4 Several structural subclasses of MGB exist, such as the diamidines, which includes the antiparasitic compounds diminazene, a treatment for animal African trypanosomiasis, and pentamidine, used in the treatment of human African trypanosomiasis. Another subclass of MGB are the polyamides, which are derived from the natural product distamycin. Many distamycin analogues have been shown to have potent in vitro and in vivo antiparasitic activities, including those discovered at the University of Strathclyde, termed Strathclyde MGBs (S-MGBs).5 Indeed, members of both the polyamides and diamidines have been shown to have some in vitro antiplasmodial activity.6
As is typical for distamycin analogues, S-MGBs have been shown to interact strongly with many AT-rich sequences of dsDNA, resulting in a multi-targeted anti-infective drug (MTAID) approach in their design.7 This multi-targeted approach has been demonstrated to reduce the likelihood of the generation of target-based resistance in pathogens, and has also enabled a broad-spectrum of activity across different phylogenetic groups of pathogens viz. bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites.5
In the antiparasitic context, S-MGBs have been shown to be effective at curing infection in in vivo models of animal African trypanosomiasis, caused by Trypanosoma congolense.8 We have also previously reported the in vitro antiplasmodial activity of a set of S-MGBs, in which we showed that compounds bearing an alkene link to the head group, as opposed to an amide or amidine, were generally more potent.9 In particular, we identified compound S-MGB-169 (named compound 27 in ref. 9), bearing an alkene-linked head group and a morpholine tail group, with a selectivity index of >514 as being of interest. Since then, the S-MGB drug discovery platform has significantly expanded to include compounds with more diverse structures. Many S-MGBs bear an amidine tail group, rather than the weakly basic morpholine tail group, as we have shown that this change gives rise to lower cytotoxicity through lower intracellular accumulation in mammalian cells, and enhanced solubility.10
In this study, we have screened a diverse set of 25 S-MGBs, crucially including strong representation of the more contemporary amidine tail group, against P. falciparum. We have again shown that S-MGBs are not affected by existing resistance mechanisms, by comparing activity against P. falciparum 3D7 and Dd2 strains. We have also shown that the amidine tail group is an important driver of selectivity in antiplasmodial S-MGBs. The compounds, S-MGB-365, S-MGB-368 and S-MGB-359 were demonstrated to bind to dsDNA, and emerge as top candidates for future drug development activities.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Distamycin and the variety of S-MGBs examined in this study. For R1, R = m-OMe, p-CF3, p-N(Me)2, o-OH, p-OMe, p-F, m-F, m-CF3. For R2, n = 1 or 2. Ar1 X = C or N. |
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 Synthesis of 5 novel S-MGBs, S-MGB-365, S-MGB-368, S-MGB-359, S-MGB-388 and S-MGB-361 (4a–e, respectively). |
S-MGB code | 3D7 IC50 (nM) | Dd2 IC50 (nM) | Dd2/3D7 | HEK293 (IC50 (nM) or % inhibition at 80 μM) | HEK 293 C50 value M | SI, HEK293/3D7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Relative HEK 293 IC50 value used to calculate SI where accurate IC50 not available. b Top concentration tested, not rIC50 as < 30% inhibition thus SI calculated with the top concentration. c Compounds bearing an amidine tail group. | ||||||
365 | 65.3 ± 0.2 | 79.6 ± 0.2 | 1.2 | 95% | 40![]() |
>612.6 |
368 | 134.0 ± 0.3 | 201.7 ± 0.3 | 1.5 | 92% | 45![]() |
>335.8 |
359 | 302.1 ± 0.6 | 318.6 ± 1.1 | 1.1 | 23% | 80![]() |
>264.8 |
337 | 95.6 ± 0.0 | 101.8 ± 0.2 | 1.1 | 101% | 21![]() |
>219.7 |
131 | 200.1 ± 0.0 | 254.4 ± 0.2 | 1.3 | 101% | 35![]() |
>194.9 |
188 | 57.0 ± 0.1 | 61.9 ± 0.3 | 1.1 | 86% | 11![]() |
>193 |
388 | 181.4 ± 2.2 | 228.6 ± 2.0 | 1.3 | 93% | 35![]() |
>192.9 |
247 | 108.9 ± 0.2 | 138.6 ± 0.2 | 1.3 | 100% | 20![]() |
>183.7 |
386 | 254.9 ± 1.2 | 207.1 ± 1.3 | 0.8 | 101% | 40![]() |
>157 |
380 | 74.7 ± 2.8 | 83.9 ± 3.6 | 1.1 | 8203 | — | 110 |
367 | 367.3 ± 0.9 | 620.3 ± 0.3 | 1.4 | 81% | 40![]() |
>108.9 |
330 | 407.7 ± 0.1 | 636.1 ± 0.4 | 1.6 | 100% | 40![]() |
>98.1 |
248 | 33.4 ± 0.7 | 57.0 ± 0.6 | 1.7 | 3134 | — | 94 |
246 | 43.0 ± 0.6 | 53.0 ± 0.4 | 1.2 | 3856 | — | 90 |
390 | 532.6 ± 0.9 | 640.2 ± 0.6 | 1.2 | 78% | 40![]() |
>75.1 |
378 | 150.1 ± 4.0 | 170.6 ± 2.9 | 1.1 | 10![]() |
— | 70 |
361 | 633.9 ± 0.2 | 558.5 ± 0.4 | 0.9 | 90% | 40![]() |
>63.1 |
376 | 147.2 ± 1.4 | 135.1 ± 1.6 | 0.9 | 9100 | — | 62 |
391 | 671.3 ± 1.4 | 1295.5 ± 0.7 | 1.9 | 100% | 40![]() |
>59.6 |
377 | 73.1 ± 4.7 | 105.2 ± 6.3 | 1.4 | 4301 | — | 59 |
379 | 149.5 ± 2.7 | 148.3 ± 5.4 | 1.0 | 8337 | — | 56 |
176 | 756.0 ± 0.8 | 1236.0 ± 3.0 | 1.6 | 80% | 40![]() |
>53 |
389 | 857.5 ± 1.3 | 488.0 ± 1.8 | 0.6 | 92% | 40![]() |
>46.6 |
192 | 96.3 ± 12.8 | 108.0 ± 20.6 | 1.1 | 3188 | — | 33 |
245 | 161.0 ± 0.5 | 169.1 ± 0.5 | 1.1 | 2747 | — | 17 |
Chloroquine | 31.3 ± 9.7 | 224.6 ± 84.4 | 7.2 | 14% | >2500 | |
Puromycin | 41.9 ± 7.2 | 49.3 ± 3.5 | 1.2 | 377.8 | 9 | |
Pyrimeth-amine | 2.69 ± 0.26 | >80![]() |
>29![]() |
3977 | 1478 | |
Pyronaridine | 26.7 ± 3.8 | 33.3 ± 6.1 | 1.3 | 3050 | 114 |
The compounds in this set possess a range of potency and cytotoxicity, enabling an assessment of structure–activity relationships. Given the potential for DNA targeting compounds to be indiscriminately cytotoxic, we first assessed selectivity between 3D7 potency and HEK293 cytotoxicity. Almost all the S-MGBs showed excellent selectivity for P. falciparum, compared with HEK293 cells, with selectivity indices ranging between 17 and >612.6 (Table 1). This suggests that the biological mechanisms governing potency and/or uptake in P. falciparum are sufficiently different to those in HEK293 to allow for selectivity.
Our previous observation of amidine tail S-MGBs having lower cytotoxicity holds true in this data set.10 When the cytotoxicity data are grouped into either amidine or non-amidine tail group containing S-MGBs, the amidine tail group compounds are found at the low cytotoxicity end of the rank ordering (Fig. 2, Panel A). Indeed, no amidine tail group compounds appear in the high cytotoxicity half of the rank ordered data. Furthermore, when taking into account potency, 3 compounds from the amidine tail group set (4a, S-MGB-365; 4b, S-MGB-368; and 4c, S-MGB-359) have the most promising Compared to the reference compounds, chloroquineCompared to the reference compounds, chloroquineselectivity indices (Fig. 2, Panel B).
Compared to the reference compounds, chloroquine, puromycin, pyrimethamine and pyronaridine, S-MGBs are a promising series. We considered the Dd2/3D7 potency, and with values not deviating far from 1, there is no evidence of cross-resistance across the S-MGBs. This contrasts to chloroquine, with a ratio of 7.2 and pyrimethamine with a ratio >372. Neither puromycin nor pyronaridine are affected by cross-resistance, however, their selectivity indices are 9 and 114, respectively, lower than several of the S-MGBs in this data set. Indeed, the potency of S-MGB-365 (65.3 nM) is on the same order of magnitude as puromycin (41.9 nM) and pyronaridine (26.7 nM).
Based on their selectivity indices, and further scrutiny of their dose response curves (Fig. 3), we selected S-MGB-365 (4a), S-MGB-368 (4b) and S-MGB-359 (4c) for further evaluation. We note that the dose response curves for these S-MGBs emphasise the excellent selectivity with respect to HEK293 cytotoxicity.
Native mass spectrometry was carried out using a short, self-complementary DNA oligo with an AT-rich binding site, 5′-CGCATATATGCG-3′, which we have used extensively across the S-MGB programme (Fig. 4). For all three S-MGBs, there was conclusive evidence that they bind as a dimer [DS + 2 M], in charge states 5- and 4- (Fig. 3). There was no evidence for S-MGB-365 (4a) or S-MGB-368 (4b) bound as a monomer [DS + 1 M]; however, there was a minor peak corresponding to the monomer complex for S-MGB-359 (4c). For S-MGB-359 (4c) there was also a small m/z peak corresponding to the free dsDNA oligo. The presence of the unbound double-stranded DNA, as well as the binding of the monomer S-MGB, suggested that the interaction of S-MGB-359 (4c) with DNA was weaker than S-MGB-365 (4a) or S-MGB-368 (4b), especially due to the high excess of MGB used in this assay.
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 nESI-MS characterisation of S-MGBs binding to double stranded DNA oligo 5′-CGCATATATGCG-3′. 9 μM DNA, (100 μM KCl, 1% DMSO) sprayed from ammonium acetate (150 mM, pH 7) in the absence (a) and presence (b) of 100 μM S-MGBs. For each panel A) S-MGB-365 (4a), B) S-MGB-368 (4b) and C) S-MGB-359 (4c), subpanels show the following: a) single stranded DNA (denoted [SS]) were present in charge states 4- and 3-, and double stranded DNA (denoted [DS]) were present in charge states 5-− and 4-. b) [SS] was present in charge state 3- and 4-. Each [DS] molecule bound 2xS-MGB molecules (denoted [DS+2 M]) and was present in charge states 5-and 4-. For S-MGB-359 (4c), panel C), a small amount of bound [DS] molecules was bound to 1xS-MGB molecule (denoted [DS+1 M]), present in charge state 5-. Expected and measured masses of each species are provided in Tables S2–S4.† |
To further probe comparative binding strengths, we also determined the DNA thermal shift of S-MGB-365 (4a), S-MGB-368 (4b) and S-MGB-359 (4c) using a model gDNA extracted from salmon. The ΔTms were found to be 12 °C, 3 °C and 16 °C for S-MGB-365 (4a), S-MGB-368 (4b) and S-MGB-359 (4c), respectively (Fig. 5). Considering these values alongside the P. falciparum IC50 values, a correlation between DNA binding strength and potency was not evident. This is consistent with a dominating contribution from intracellular accumulation over target engagement governing potency.
In this study 25 S-MGBs, including 5 that were previously unpublished, have been synthesised and evaluated in in vitro asexual P. falciparum assays against P. falciparum 3D7 and Dd2, and HEK293 mammalian cells. This set of S-MGBs included a variety of contemporary structures, including those bearing an amidine tail group. Similar to our previous study on the antiplasmodial activity of S-MGBs, we found the S-MGBs in this study to range in their potency and selectivity, allowing for an assessment of SAR.
S-MGB-365 (4a), S-MGB-368 (4b) and S-MGB-359 (4c) have been identified as both potent (∼100 nM) and selective compounds and importantly no cross-resistance observed with the strains tested. Notably, the compounds of most interest, based on a combination of potency and selectivity, S-MGB-365 (4a), S-MGB-368 (4b) and S-MGB-359 (4c) all contain an amidine tail group. However, there does not appear to be a correlation between amidine tail group and potency against P. falciparum alone, suggesting that this moiety is important in driving low cytotoxicity towards mammalian cells. We also note that the behaviour of S-MGB-359 against HEK293 cells suggests it to be substantially less cytotoxic than the other compounds assessed (Panel C, Fig. 3). This different behaviour may be associated with its likely amphiphilic nature, given that head group in this molecule is a hydrophobic naphthyl moiety.
It has been well established in recent literature that similar S-MGBs, including those with amidine tail groups, interact with DNA by forming 2:
1 complexes at suitable AT-rich binding sites.5,10S-MGB-365 (4a), S-MGB-368 (4b) and S-MGB-359 (4c) have been shown to adhere to this principle, strongly suggesting that the mechanism of action of antiplasmodial S-MGBs involves DNA binding, and this is in line with antibacterial and antitrypanosomal S-MGBs.7,8
However, DNA binding strength alone is not sufficient to explain potency trends. Despite having the highest DNA thermal melting temperature of the three compounds of interest, S-MGB-359 (4c) has the lowest potency. This observation suggests that molecular properties that contribute to accumulation within pathogen cells are also a key component to potency, in addition to DNA binding. Indeed, this is consistent with other S-MGB drug discovery programmes, and explains the low potency towards Gram-negative bacterial pathogens despite strong binding to Gram-negative bacterial DNA.5,7,10
In conclusion, S-MGB-365 (4a), S-MGB-368 (4b) and S-MGB-359 (4c) have been identified as promising compounds from which to continue drug discovery efforts towards new antiplasmodial agents due to their potency, selectivity, and lack of cross-resistance mechanisms.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4md00619d |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |